Request for Proposal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Request for Proposal Request for Proposal Solicitation #: 302813 Date Issued: July 24, 2017 Issued To: Offerors This Request for Proposal (RFP) is issued under the authority of the Department of Energy Prime Contract DE-AC06-09RL14728. This RFP is issued by: Mission Support Alliance, LLC P.O. Box 650 Richland, WA 99352 Contract Specialist: Amber Burgett G3-16 (509) 376-7927 [email protected] Proposals are to be prepared in accordance with the instructions and conditions set forth herein. Proposals are to be received by 4:00 PST on August 2, 2017 to the address shown above, attention to the Contract Specialist identified above. All questions are to be directed to the Contract Specialist identified above. All proposals are subject to the terms and conditions set forth herein. Any exceptions, deviations, or omissions may be grounds for rejection of proposals submitted. REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL No. 302813 Table of Contents A.0 Solicitation .......................................................................................................................... 3 A.1 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code and Size Standard ...................................................................................................................3 A.2 Evaluation of Discount ............................................................................................3 A.3 Basis of Award – Lowest Price Technically Acceptable .........................................3 A.4 Rate Schedule ...........................................................................................................4 A.5 Conflict of Interest Disclosure and Representation .................................................4 A.6 Proposal Submittal ...................................................................................................5 A.7 Foreign Nationals .....................................................................................................6 B.0 Award .................................................................................................................................. 7 B.1 Award Notification ..................................................................................................7 C.0 QA / Inspection Requirements – Not Applicable ............................................................... 7 D.0 Description/Statement of Work – Attached Below ............................................................ 7 E.0 Transportation Instructions – Not Applicable ..................................................................... 7 F.0 Schedule .............................................................................................................................. 7 G.0 Delivery/Performance ......................................................................................................... 7 G.1 Term of Subcontract ................................................................................................7 G.2 Authorized Personnel ...............................................................................................7 G.3 Electronic Mail Capability .......................................................................................8 G.4 Closeout Certification ..............................................................................................8 G.5 Subcontractor Invoices for Subcontracts .................................................................8 G.6 Terms of Payment ....................................................................................................9 H.0 Special Requirements........................................................................................................ 10 H.1 Facility Closure Notice - Holiday and Work Schedules ........................................10 H.2 Service Contract Act of 1965 .................................................................................10 H.3 Designation of Technical Representative ..............................................................10 H.4 Size Standards Reporting Requirements ................................................................11 I.0 Terms and Conditions ....................................................................................................... 12 I.1 General Provisions – Commercial .........................................................................12 I.2 Special Provisions – On-Site (Formerly SP-5) ......................................................12 J.0 List of Attachments ........................................................................................................... 12 J.1 Statement of Work (SOW) .....................................................................................12 K.0 Signatures – Not Applicable ............................................................................................. 12 L.0 Representations and Certifications ................................................................................... 12 L.1 Subcontractor Acknowledgement of Federal Online Representations and Certifications ..........................................................................................................12 Page 2 of 13 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL No. 302813 A.0 Solicitation A.1 North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code and Size Standard (A01) Rev 002 3/1/2011 The Buyer has determined that North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) Code 541611 applies to this acquisition. Therefore, the size standard for determining whether an Offeror is a small business in regard to this acquisition is $15 Million. If this solicitation is designated as a small business set-aside, the Offeror certifies that they are a small business by submitting a proposal or an offer to this solicitation. A.2 Evaluation of Discount (A36) Rev. 0 01/27/2010 Discounts for early payment will be considered in the evaluation of this Offer. The minimum days offered with discount that will be considered are 10. A separate invoice shall be issued for each delivery. No invoice shall be issued prior to delivery of goods and no payment shall be made prior to receipt of goods. Discount periods will be computed from the date of receipt of a correct invoice or receipt of merchandise, whichever is later, to the date the Buyer’s check is mailed. Discount will be taken on the full amount of the invoice unless freight and other charges are itemized. A.3 Basis of Award – Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (A85) Rev. 1 2/28/2013 Award may be made to the Offeror submitting the lowest evaluated price that is technically acceptable among offers that meet all requirements of the solicitation. Page 3 of 13 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL No. 302813 A.4 Rate Schedule (A99) Rev. 0 4/12/2011 The Firm Fixed Prices listed below shall cover all of the items listed below and as described in the Statement of Work. Firm Fixed Price Description Total 1. Review artifacts (Such as Work Breakdown Structure dictionaries, work authorizations documents, variance analysis reports, etc.) and prepare for his/her one-week on-site visit/review and participate in a teleconference prior to arriving on-site; 2. One-week on-site visit the Subcontractor will: a. Based on the CAM selection from MSA, review VARs and WADs for the CAM identified (i.e., primarily the CAMs with infrastructure reliability projects), b. Review and recommend improvements in the flow of VAR data to Contract Performance Report (CPR) Format 5 narratives, c. Conduct selected CAM interviews and review of CAM Notebooks to provide both an observation of the CAM’s knowledge, skills, and abilities, as well as mentoring in areas needing improvement. As necessary during these reviews, provide VAR and WAD training/mentoring. 3. Prepare observations and recommendations as noted during each on- site CAM interview by using interview forms (blank form/format provided by subcontractor individual). 4. Submit final report summary of all CAM reviews, mentoring observations, session findings, as well as evaluations and comparisons of the individual sessions. Firm Fixed Price Travel based on Federal Travel Regulation (FTR) Rates Subtotal: A.5 Conflict of Interest Disclosure and Representation (A102) Rev. 1 5/01/2014 It is the Buyer’s policy to avoid situations, which place a Subcontractor in a position wherein it may not be able to compete on an equal basis for Buyer-controlled work with other qualified Page 4 of 13 REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL No. 302813 contractors. To address this matter, the Subcontractor is to consider the relevant circumstances surrounding this effort to determine if there are any past, present or future interests (financial, contractual, organizational or personal) that could be viewed as a conflict of interest. The Subcontractor is to insert the following statement into any proposal response to MSA: Subcontractor hereby certifies that [ ] there is not or [ ] there is a potential conflict of interest. If there are any real or potential concerns, they shall be disclosed and highlighted in the Subcontractor’s proposal. Any such disclosure may result in the need for additional discussions relative to the Subcontractor’s continued participation in this effort. A.6 Proposal Submittal (A37) Rev. 0 03/14/2011 1. Proposals are to be received by the date specified in the Solicitation. 2. Proposal Submittal Methods The complete proposal package shall be submitted electronically by E-mail to [email protected]. The original proposal form and certifications must be sent to the Contract Specialist when requested as confirmation. 3. Late Proposals
Recommended publications
  • Law, Technology, and Public Health in the COVID-19 Crisis
    Privacy in Pandemic: Law, Technology, and Public Health in the COVID-19 Crisis Tiffany C. Li* The COVID-19 pandemic has caused millions of deaths and disastrous consequences around the world, with lasting repercussions for every field of law, including privacy and technology. The unique characteristics of this pandemic have precipitated an increase in use of new technologies, including remote communications platforms, healthcare robots, and medical AI. Public and private actors alike are using new technologies, like heat sensing, and technologically influenced programs, like contact tracing, leading to a rise in government and corporate surveillance in sectors like healthcare, employment, education, and commerce. Advocates have raised the alarm for privacy and civil liberties violations, but the emergency nature of the pandemic has drowned out many concerns. This Article is the first comprehensive account of privacy in pandemic that maps the terrain of privacy impacts related to technology and public health responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Many have written on the general need for better health privacy protections, education privacy protections, consumer privacy protections, and protections against government and corporate surveillance. However, this Article is the first comprehensive article to examine these problems of privacy and technology specifically in light of the pandemic, arguing that the lens of the pandemic exposes the need for both wide-scale and small-scale reform of privacy law. This Article approaches these problems with a focus on technical realities and social * Visiting Clinical Assistant Professor, Boston University School of Law; Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society Project. The author thanks Tally Amir, Chinmayi Arun, Jack M.
    [Show full text]
  • A Deep Dive Into the Technology of Corporate Surveillance
    Behind the One-Way Mirror: A Deep Dive Into the Technology of Corporate Surveillance Author: Bennett Cyphers and Gennie Gebhart ​ A publication of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2019. “Behind the One-Way Mirror: A Deep Dive Into the Technology of Corporate Surveillance” is released under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). View this report online: https://www.eff.org/wp/behind-the-one-way-mirror ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 1 Behind the One-Way Mirror: A Deep Dive Into the Technology of Corporate Surveillance Behind the One-Way Mirror A Deep Dive Into the Technology of Corporate Surveillance BENNETT CYPHERS AND GENNIE GEBHART December 2, 2019 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 2 Behind the One-Way Mirror: A Deep Dive Into the Technology of Corporate Surveillance Introduction 4 First-party vs. third-party tracking 4 What do they know? 5 Part 1: Whose Data is it Anyway: How Do Trackers Tie Data to People? 6 Identifiers on the Web 8 Identifiers on mobile devices 17 Real-world identifiers 20 Linking identifiers over time 22 Part 2: From bits to Big Data: What do tracking networks look like? 22 Tracking in software: Websites and Apps 23 Passive, real-world tracking 27 Tracking and corporate power 31 Part 3: Data sharing: Targeting, brokers, and real-time bidding 33 Real-time bidding 34 Group targeting and look-alike audiences 39 Data brokers 39 Data consumers 41 Part 4: Fighting back 43 On the web 43 On mobile phones 45 IRL 46 In the legislature 46 ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION 3 Behind the One-Way Mirror: A Deep Dive Into the Technology of Corporate Surveillance Introduction Trackers are hiding in nearly every corner of today’s Internet, which is to say nearly every corner of modern life.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-20-195G, Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide
    COST ESTIMATING AND ASSESSMENT GUIDE Best Practices for Developing and Managing Program Costs GAO-20-195G March 2020 Contents Preface 1 Introduction 3 Chapter 1 Why Government Programs Need Cost Estimates and the Challenges in Developing Them 8 Cost Estimating Challenges 9 Chapter 2 Cost Analysis and Cost Estimates 17 Types of Cost Estimates 17 Significance of Cost Estimates 22 Cost Estimates in Acquisition 22 The Importance of Cost Estimates in Establishing Budgets 24 Cost Estimates and Affordability 25 Chapter 3 The Characteristics of Credible Cost Estimates and a Reliable Process for Creating Them 31 The Four Characteristics of a Reliable Cost Estimate 31 Best Practices Related to Developing and Maintaining a Reliable Cost Estimate 32 Cost Estimating Best Practices and the Estimating Process 33 Chapter 4 Step 1: Define the Estimate’s Purpose 38 Scope 38 Including All Costs in a Life Cycle Cost Estimate 39 Survey of Step 1 40 Chapter 5 Step 2: Developing the Estimating Plan 41 Team Composition and Organization 41 Study Plan and Schedule 42 Cost Estimating Team 44 Certification and Training for Cost Estimating and EVM Analysis 46 Survey of Step 2 46 Chapter 6 Step 3: Define the Program - Technical Baseline Description 48 Definition and Purpose 48 Process 48 Contents 49 Page i GAO-20-195G Cost Estimating and Assessment Guide Key System Characteristics and Performance Parameters 52 Survey of Step 3 54 Chapter 7 Step 4: Determine the Estimating Structure - Work Breakdown Structure 56 WBS Concepts 56 Common WBS Elements 61 WBS Development
    [Show full text]
  • Social Control and Surveillance in the Society of Consumers
    International Journal of Sociology and Anthropology Vol. 3(6) pp. 180-188, June 2011 Available online http://www.academicjournals.org/ijsa ISSN 2006-988x ©2011 Academic Journals Review Social control and surveillance in the society of consumers Massimo Ragnedda Dipartimento di Economia Istituzioni e Società (DEIS), Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia, Università degli Studi di Sassari, Piazza Conte di Moriana 8, 07100 Sassari, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]. Tel: +39 079229654. Fax: +39 079229660 Accepted January 21, 2011 The new Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) introduced a highly automated and much cheaper systematic observation of personal data. ICTs advance the intensification and the extension of surveillance, such that an expanding quantity of data can now be collected, tabulated and cross- referenced more rapidly and more accurately than old paper files. This process contributes to the building a "new electronic cage" constraining the individual, on the basis of his e-profile and data- matching. Especially two agents of surveillance are interested in collecting and using such data: government authorities and private corporations. Massive stores of personal data held on ordinary people are now vital to both public services and private business purposes. The new electronic cage is more all-encompassing and complete, being able to produce a complete profile of citizens and consumers in real time. Both public and private information agencies rely on one another for creating and modelling the profiles of good citizens/consumers who, by definition, are well integrated into social life, exhibiting predictable behaviour that conforms to the general needs of contemporary consumer/ oriented social relations.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial Marketing and the Rise of Commercial Consumer Surveillance
    Marketing and the Rise of Commercial Editorial Consumer Surveillance Jason Pridmore Detlev Zwick The DigIDeas project, Schulich School of Business, Zuyd University, York University, The Netherlands. Canada. [email protected] [email protected] Marketing Transitions With the widespread adoption of Fordist regimes of production and Taylorist regimes of management in early 20th century America (Gramsci 1971; Hardt and Negri 2000, 219-350), supply of commodities began to surpass market demand consistently for the first time in history. The advent of mass production required mass consumption and as a consequence, the profession of marketing management was developed. Though marketing management had its roots in agricultural economics and was characterized initially by pragmatic macro-economic concerns about distribution efficiencies and co-operative marketing of agricultural products (Bartels 1988), it obtained an increasingly dominant function within commercial practices as it focused on selling more of a particular product than the competition. The new priorities set by a nascent corporate capitalism that pitches companies directly against each other for scarce consumer resources produced novel needs for knowledge about the market, including knowledge about consumers. Hence, corporate marketing management developed early forms of market research to produce consumer knowledge that would help outsell any rivals. Early market research led to a view of the consumer as a relatively stable, homogeneous, and immobile set of preferences that could be managed and controlled with mass advertising (Beniger 1986). An understanding of the consumer as a psycho- socially complex and mutable collection of needs, wants, and desires did not emerge until the 1940s (Miller and Rose 1997; Rose 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Surveillance in Workplaces and Their Legitimate Usage to Provide Transparency and Accountability Towards Employees
    © 2019 JETIR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Electronic surveillance in workplaces and their legitimate usage to provide transparency and accountability towards employees 1Gursimran Singh, 2Dr. Payal Bassi 1Research Scholar, 2Professor, 1 Department of Commerce and Management 1Regional Institute of Management and Technology, Mandi Gobindgarh, India Abstract: Companies used surveillance software’s, CCTV cameras to watch their employees, monitoring their e-mails or the websites content they visit. Sometimes managers used surveillance to provide protection of their companies from legal acquaintances that originates against the wrong doing behavior of their employees such as download of pornography material and provoke able e-mails or messages to other individuals and to provide protection against the inappropriate exposure of exclusive or confidential information on the internet. As the reasons of employers behind these processes can be valid, there are conflicting thoughts of the usage of this technology among the employees. This paper discusses the latest surveillance measures, technologies used by the employer, lawful disputes that can arise from surveillance as well as consequences or problems originate for the management. This paper also discusses some questions about the right of usage of internet or e-mails in the corporations for the personnel motives of the employees and to what extent their can use their right. To what extent the managers or companies lawfully monitor the workplaces or employees behavior on the internet. And about the employees expectations regarding the surveillance used in order to protect their online privacy and the legal options company have provided for them. The paper expresses the ways for further research in surveillance of employees and a more detailed reasoning in improving lawful and policy-making can be analyzed further.
    [Show full text]
  • Surveillance Self-Defense: Privacy in the Post-9/11 Mass Surveillance State Nathaniel D
    Southern Illinois University Carbondale OpenSIUC Research Papers Graduate School Spring 4-13-2017 Surveillance Self-Defense: Privacy in the Post-9/11 Mass Surveillance State Nathaniel D. Fortmeyer Southern Illinois University Carbondale, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/gs_rp Recommended Citation Fortmeyer, Nathaniel D. "Surveillance Self-Defense: Privacy in the Post-9/11 Mass Surveillance State." (Spring 2017). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at OpenSIUC. It has been accepted for inclusion in Research Papers by an authorized administrator of OpenSIUC. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SURVEILLANCE SELF-DEFENSE: PRIVACY IN THE POST-9/11 MASS SURVEILLANCE STATE by Nathaniel Dean Fortmeyer B.A., Southern Illinois University, 2011 B.A., Southern Illinois University, 2013 A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Master of Science. Department of Mass Communication and Media Arts In the Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale May 2017 RESEARCH PAPER APPROVAL SURVEILLANCE SELF-DEFENSE: PRIVACY IN THE POST-9/11 MASS SURVEILLANCE STATE By Nathaniel Dean Fortmeyer A Research Paper Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in the field of Professional Media and Media Management Approved by: Robert Spahr, Chair Graduate School Southern Illinois University Carbondale March 28, 2017 AN ABSTRACT OF THE RESEARCH PAPER OF NATHANIEL DEAN FORTMEYER, for the Master of Science degree in PROFESSIONAL MEDIA AND MEDIA MANAGEMENT, presented on MARCH 28, 2017, at Southern Illinois University Carbondale. TITLE: SURVEILLANCE SELF-DEFENSE: PRIVACY IN THE POST-9/11 MASS SURVEILLANCE STATE MAJOR PROFESSOR: Robert Spahr The nature of digital information and the networked world has enabled the greatest advances in communication, education, art, science, and entertainment since the invention of the printing press.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities and Challenges for Socially Responsible Business in China
    University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) 2016 Opportunities and Challenges for Socially Responsible Business in China Liana Tai University of Mississippi. Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Tai, Liana, "Opportunities and Challenges for Socially Responsible Business in China" (2016). Honors Theses. 582. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/582 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Opportunities and Challenges for Socially Responsible Business in China © 2016 By Liana Christine Tai A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Mississippi in partial fulfillment of the requirements for completion of the Bachelor of Arts degree in International Studies Croft Institute for International Studies Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College The University of Mississippi University, Mississippi May 2016 Approved by: ______________________________ Advisor: Dr. Gang Guo ______________________________ Reader: Dr. Kees Gispen ______________________________ Reader: Dr. Seong Byun i ABSTRACT This thesis aims to demonstrate the unique circumstances that China poses for the development of socially responsible business in China. Socially responsible business is a concept that has emerged in Western nations in recent years, due to the growing environmental and social consciousness of consumers and their increasing demands for companies to meet higher standards in this regard. Socially responsible business refers to those corporate entities that use the market to stimulate change in peoples’ awareness of and attitudes toward a certain social issue and, ultimately, consumer behavior and habits.
    [Show full text]
  • Milestone Federated Architecturetm
    White paper Milestone Federated ArchitectureTM Prepared by: John Rasmussen, Senior Product Manager Milestone Systems Date: August 8, 2017 Milestone Systems TM White paper – Milestone Federated Architecture Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................. 3 Purpose and target audience ......................................................................... 3 Designing a multisite video surveillance system ............................................ 4 Milestone Federated Architecture Overview ................................................... 4 Milestone Federated Architecture example .................................................... 5 Corporation with regional and branch offices .............................................. 5 Configuring Milestone Federated Architecture ............................................... 6 Prerequisites ............................................................................................... 6 Adding site to a hierarchy ........................................................................... 7 How to patch an older version..................................................................... 8 Network traffic between sites ..................................................................... 9 User Experience ............................................................................................. 9 Management Client ..................................................................................... 9 Smart
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-07-1134SP Cost Assessment Guide: Best
    United States Government Accountability Office GAO Applied Research and Methods July 2007 COST ASSESSMENT GUIDE Best Practices for Estimating and Managing Program Costs Exposure Draft GAO-07-1134SP Exposure Draft PREFACE The U.S. Government Accountability Office is responsible for, among other things, assisting the Congress in its oversight of the federal government, including agencies’ stewardship of public funds. To effectively use public funds, the government must meet the demands of today’s changing world by employing effective management practices and processes, including the measurement of government program performance. Legislators, government officials, and the public want to know whether government programs are achieving their goals and what their costs are. We developed the Cost Guide in order to establish a consistent methodology, based on best practices, to be used across the federal government for developing and managing its program cost estimates. For the purposes of this guide, a cost estimate is the summation of individual cost elements, using established methods and valid data to estimate the future costs of a program, based on what is known today. The management of a cost estimate involves continually updating the estimate with actual data as they become available, revising the estimate to reflect changes, and analyzing differences between estimated and actual costs—for example, using data from a reliable earned value management (EVM) system.1 The ability to generate reliable cost estimates is a critical function, necessary to support the Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) capital programming process.2 Without this ability, agencies are at risk of experiencing cost overruns, missed deadlines, and performance shortfalls—all recurring problems that our program assessments too often reveal.
    [Show full text]
  • Corporate Surveillance in Everyday Life
    Wolfie Christl CORPORATE SURVEILLANCE IN EVERYDAY LIFE How Companies Collect, Combine, Analyze, Trade, and Use Personal Data on Billions A REPORT BY CRACKED LABS Vienna, June 2017 Author: Wolfie Christl Contributors: Katharina Kopp, Patrick Urs Riechert Illustrations: Pascale Osterwalder Wolfie Christl Corporate Surveillance in Everyday Life How Companies Collect, Combine, Analyze, Trade, and Use Personal Data on Billions A Report by Cracked Labs, Vienna, June 2017 © 2017 Cracked Labs CC BY-SA 4.0 Author: Wolfie Christl Contributors: Katharina Kopp, Patrick Urs Riechert Illustrations: Pascale Osterwalder Every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of the texts in this report. The author and the publisher accept no liability in the case of eventual errors. Cracked Lab – Institute for Critical Digital Culture Annagasse 8/1/8, 1010 Vienna, Austria http://crackedlabs.org Wolfie Christl is a digital rights activist, technologist, researcher, writer and educator, based in Vienna http://twitter.com/WolfieChristl http://wolfie.crackedlabs.org The production of this report was supported by the Open Society Foundations. Table of Contents 1. Background and Scope .......................................................................................................... 4 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 6 3. Relevant players within the business of personal data .................................................... 11 3.1 Businesses in all
    [Show full text]
  • Escaping from Government and Corporate Surveillance. Evidence from the MIT Digital Currency Experiment
    Escaping from Government and Corporate Surveillance. Evidence from the MIT Digital Currency Experiment ∗ Susan Athey, Christian Catalini, and Catherine Tucker October 3, 2016 Abstract This paper uses data from the MIT digital currency experiment to shed light on consumer behavior regarding commercial and government surveillance. This allows us to explore the apparent contradiction that many cryptocurrencies offer people the chance to escape government surveillance, but do so by making transactions themselves public. We find three main things. First, the effect of small incentives (financial or otherwise) may explain the privacy paradox, where people say they care about privacy but are willing to relinquish private data to firms quite easily. Second, prompts about government surveillance can lead consumers to be be more protective about linking their personal identity to their digital wallets, but such privacy enhancing behavior is suppressed in the presence of irrelevant but reassuring information about privacy protection. Third, that we also see such irrelevant but reassuring information lead consumers to be less likely to take more general actions to escape surveillance at large. ∗Susan Athey: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, and NBER. Christian Catalini: MIT Sloan School of Management, MIT. Catherine Tucker: MIT Sloan School of Management, MIT and NBER. Corresponding author: [email protected] 1 Summary of Main Results In the Fall of 2014, students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology were preparing for one of the largest social science experiments the campus had seen (Catalini and Tucker, 2016): In the following weeks, every undergraduate student would be given $100 worth of Bitcoin, the first decentralized cryptocurrency to solve the double-spending problem that had plagued computer scientists’ early attempts at creating digital cash (Nakamoto, 2008; Narayanan et al., 2016).
    [Show full text]