DOCSLIB.ORG

Gadtech Materials Pty Ltd, Sunshine Quarry, Maydena

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gadtech Materials Pty Ltd, Sunshine Quarry, Maydena Y GADTECH MATERIALS PTY LTD SUNSHINE QUARRY, MAYDENA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT Van Diemen CONSULTING PO BOX 1, NEW TOWN, TAS 7008 Sunshine Quarry, Maydena – Environmental Impact Statement Van Diemen Consulting Pty Ltd PO Box 1 New Town, Tasmania T: 0438 588 695 E: [email protected] This document has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services agreed upon between Van Diemen Consulting (VDC) and the Client. To the best of VDC’s knowledge, the report presented herein represents the Client’s intentions at the time of completing the document. However, the passage of time, manifestation of latent conditions or impacts of future events may result in changes to matters that are otherwise described in this document. In preparing this document VDC has relied upon data, surveys, analysis, designs, plans and other information provided by the client, and other individuals and organisations referenced herein. Except as otherwise stated in this document, VDC has not verified the accuracy or completeness of such data, surveys, analysis, designs, plans and other information. No responsibility is accepted for use of any part of this document in any other context or for any other purpose by third parties. This document does not purport to provide legal advice. Readers should engage professional legal advisers for this purpose. Document Status REV Author Review Date 1 R Barnes C McCoull R Barnes 30‐1‐2021 1 R Barnes C McCoull T Jacobson, Gadtech Materials Pty Ltd 31‐1‐2021 1 R Barnes C McCoull EPA 12‐2‐2021 2 R Barnes C McCoull R Barnes 17‐2‐2021 2 R Barnes C McCoull T Jacobson, Gadtech Materials Pty Ltd 17‐2‐2021 2 R Barnes C McCoull EPA 26‐2‐2021 3 R Barnes C McCoull R Barnes 6‐3‐2021 3 R Barnes C McCoull T Jacobson, Gadtech Materials Pty Ltd 8‐3‐2021 3 R Barnes C McCoull EPA 8‐3‐2021 Sunshine Quarry, Maydena – Environmental Impact Statement PREFACE ................................................................................................................................ 7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 10 PROPOSED ACTIVITY ................................................................................................................ 10 LOCATION ................................................................................................................................ 10 PROPONENT ............................................................................................................................. 10 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT MEASURES ........................................................................ 10 DECOMMISIONING AND REHABILITATION .............................................................................. 12 PART A – INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 13 A.1 PROPONENT DETAILS .............................................................................................................. 13 A.2 CONSULTANT DETAILS ............................................................................................................. 13 A.3 LANDOWNER DETAILS ............................................................................................................. 13 A.4 QUARRY INFORMATION ........................................................................................................... 13 A.5 TIMEFRAME AND LONGEVITY OF DEVELOPMENT .......................................................................... 14 A.6 RESOURCE IMPORTANCE, PROJECT RATIONALE AND ALTERNATIVES .................................................. 14 A.6.1 SIGNIFICANCE OF RESOURCE ............................................................................................. 14 A.6.2 PROJECT RATIONALE ....................................................................................................... 14 A.6.3 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ................................................................................................... 15 A.7 ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION, STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES ........................................................ 15 PART B ‐ PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................ 19 B.1 LOCATION ............................................................................................................................. 19 B.2 VOLUME EXTRACTED ............................................................................................................... 19 B.3 EXTRACTION METHODS ........................................................................................................... 19 B.3.1 PRIMARY ACTIVITIES ........................................................................................................ 19 B.3.2 DRILLING AND BLASTING .................................................................................................. 19 B.3.3 CRUSHING AND SCREENING .............................................................................................. 20 B.4 EXTRACTION (MINE) PLAN ....................................................................................................... 20 B.4.1 EXTRACTION AREA .......................................................................................................... 20 B.4.2 CRUSHING – SCREENING AND STOCKPILE AREA .................................................................... 20 B.4.3 SEDIMENT PONDS ............................................................................................................ 20 B.4.4 INFRASTRUCTURE ............................................................................................................ 21 B.4.5 AMENITIES ..................................................................................................................... 21 B.5 OPERATING HOURS ................................................................................................................. 21 B.6 QUARRY EQUIPMENT ............................................................................................................... 22 B.7 ROAD USE AND TRAFFIC GENERATION ......................................................................................... 22 B.7.1 ACCESS ROAD ................................................................................................................ 22 B.7.2 TRAFFIC GENERATION AND CHARACTERISTICS ...................................................................... 22 B.8 VEGETATION REMOVAL AND MANAGEMENT............................................................................... 22 B.9 TOPSOIL – OVERBURDEN REMOVAL AND MANAGEMENT .............................................................. 32 B.10 BLAST PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT ...................................................................................... 32 B.10.1 REQUIREMENT TO CONDUCT BLASTING ............................................................................. 32 B.10.2 GENERAL APPROACH TO BLAST MANAGEMENT ................................................................... 32 PART C – PLANNING SCHEME INFORMATION ........................................................................ 34 Sunshine Quarry, Maydena – Environmental Impact Statement C.1 CATEGORISATION OF USE/DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 34 C.2 ZONING AND OVERLAYS .......................................................................................................... 34 C.3 USE STATUS .......................................................................................................................... 34 C.4 DEVELOPMENT ASSESSMENT AGAINST THE SCHEME ..................................................................... 34 PART D – EXISTING ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................... 37 D.1 CLIMATE PARAMETERS ...................................................................................................... 37 D.2 LANDFORM (TOPOGRAPHY) AND TENURE ............................................................................. 42 D.2.1 TOPOGRAPHY ................................................................................................................ 42 D.2.2 LAND TENURE ................................................................................................................ 42 D.3 ROAD NETWORK ................................................................................................................ 42 D.4 LAND USES ............................................................................................................................ 42 D.4.1 RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS .................................................................................................. 42 D.4.2 FORESTRY LAND ............................................................................................................. 43 D.4.3 RESERVED LAND ............................................................................................................. 43 D.4.4 RECREATION LAND AND FACILITIES .................................................................................... 43 D.5 GEOLOGY AND LAND CAPABILITY ............................................................................................ 43 D.5.1 GEOLOGY AND SOILS .................................................................................................... 43 D.5.2 LAND CAPABILITY ...........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Visitor Learning Guide
    VISITOR LEARNING GUIDE 1 Produced by The Wilderness Society The Styx Valley of the Giants oers the opportunity to experience one of the world’s most iconic and spectacular forest areas. For decades the Wilderness Society has worked with the broader community to achieve protection for the Styx and we want to share it, and some of its stories, with you. This guide is not meant to be a comprehensive overview of the Styx, Tasmania’s forests or World Heritage. Rather, it is designed to share a cross-section of knowledge through simple stories that follow a common theme on each of the identified walks. With its help, we hope you will learn from this spectacular place, and leave knowing more about our forests, their natural and cultural legacy and some other interesting titbits. The Wilderness Society acknowledges the Tasmanian Aboriginal community as the traditional owners and custodians of all Country in Tasmania and pays respect to Elders past and present. We support eorts to progress reconciliation, land justice and equality. We recognise and welcome actions that seek to better identify, present, protect and conserve Aboriginal cultural heritage, irrespective of where it is located. Cover photo: A giant eucalypt in the Styx Valley, Rob Blakers. © The Wilderness Society, Tasmania 2015. STYX VALLEY OF THE GIANTS - VISITOR LEARNING GUIDE TO ELLENDALE MT FIELD FENTONBURY NATIONAL PARK WESTERWAY B61 TYENNA Tyenna River TO NEW NORFOLK TO LAKE PEDDER & HOBART & STRATHGORDON MAYDENA FOOD & ACCOMMODATION There’s some great accommodation and food options on your way to the Styx. Westerway • Blue Wren Riverside Cottage • Duy’s Country Accommodation Styx River • Platypus Playground Riverside Cottage Styx River .
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGES in SOUTHWESTERN TASMANIAN FIRE REGIMES SINCE the EARLY 1800S
    Papers and Proceedings o/the Royal Society o/Tasmania, Volume 132, 1998 IS CHANGES IN SOUTHWESTERN TASMANIAN FIRE REGIMES SINCE THE EARLY 1800s by Jon B. Marsden-Smedley (with five tables and one text-figure) MARSDEN-SMEDLEY, ].B., 1998 (31:xii): Changes in southwestern Tasmanian fire regimes since the early 1800s. Pap.Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 132: 15-29. ISSN 0040-4703. School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001. There have been major changes in the fire regime of southwestern Tasmania over the past 170 years. The fire regime has changed from an Aboriginal fire regime of frequent low-intensity fires in buttongrass moorland (mostly in spring and autumn) with only the occasional high-intensity forest fire, to the early European fire regime of frequent high-intensity fires in all vegetation types, to a regime of low to medium intensity buttongrass moorland fires and finally to the current regime of few fires. These changes in the fire regime resulted in major impacts to the region's fire-sensitive vegetation types during the early European period, while the current low fire frequency across much of southwestern Tasmania has resulted in a large proportion of the region's fire-adapted buttongrass moorland being classified as old-growth. These extensive areas of old-growth buttongrass moorland mean that the potential for another large-scale ecologically damaging wildfire is high and, to avoid this, it would be better to re-introduce a regime oflow-intensity fires into the region. Key Words: fire regimes, fire management, southwestern Tasmania, Aboriginal fire, history.
    [Show full text]
  • Derwent Valley Council
    DERWENT VALLEY COUNCIL Enquiries: Jess Dallas File: 084 Telephone: (03) 6261 8517 25 June 2020 Andrew Harvey TWWHA Tourism Master Plan Project Manager Project Management Office PO Box 44 Hobart TAS 7001 By email to: [email protected] No hard copy to follow Dear Andrew TWWHA TOURISM MASTERPLAN – PUBLIC COMMENT Thankyou for the opportunity to comment on the above. As a Local Government Area which not only borders on, but has significant land mass within the TWWHA this document is particularly significant to the Derwent Valley. Recent growth in the adventure tourism and cruise ship market in the area also makes the Tourism Master Plan (Master Plan) relevant to our community. Those involved in the creation of the Master Plan should be commended on recognising the importance of regional dispersal of tourists to local economies and its inclusion with the document. Our Council commends DPIPWE on the overall direction provided by the Master Plan and looks forward to working together with stakeholders to implement the plan. Please find attached feedback on specific sections of the Master Plan. Yours sincerely Dean Griggs Circle Street, New Norfolk. P.O. Box 595, New Norfolk, 7140 Ph: (03) 6261 8500 Fax: (03) 6261 8546 Email: [email protected] Website: www.derwentvalley.tas.gov.au DERWENT VALLEY COUNCIL GENERAL MANAGER Circle Street, New Norfolk. P.O. Box 595, New Norfolk, 7140 Ph: (03) 6261 8500 Fax: (03) 6261 8546 Email: [email protected] Website: www.derwentvalley.tas.gov.au Derwent Valley Council response to TWWHA Master Plan Introduction: Council notes that the Master Plan is subordinate to the TWWHA Management Plan (Management Plan) 2016, and is therefore to some extent limited by the confines of the Management Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Maydena, Skeleton, Nevada, Weld and Picton 1:25 000 Scale Map Sheets
    Mineral Resources Tasmania Tasmanian Geological Survey Tasmania DEPARTMENT of INFRASTRUCTURE, Record 2006/04 ENERGY and RESOURCES Geology of the Maydena, Skeleton, Nevada, Weld and Picton 1:25 000 scale map sheets by C. R. Calver, S. M. Forsyth and J. L. Everard CONTENTS General remarks …………………………………………………………………………………………… 5 Parmeener Supergroup mapping (Maydena, Skeleton, Nevada map sheets) …………………………………… 6 Vegetation ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 7 Physiography ……………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Fold structure province ………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Fault structure province ………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Acknowledgements ………………………………………………………………………………………… 12 STRATIGRAPHY ………………………………………………………………………………………… 13 Proterozoic sedimentary rocks ……………………………………………………………………………… 13 Harrisons Opening Formation (Weld, Picton map sheets)…………………………………………………… 13 Turbiditic lithic sandstone, conglomerate and black phyllite (Phc) …………………………………………… 13 Black slate and phyllite with minor quartzwacke and diamictite (Php) ………………………………………… 13 Clark Group …………………………………………………………………………………………… 16 Clark Group correlate, Jubilee Range area (Skeleton, Nevada map sheets) ……………………………………… 16 Needles Quartzite correlate ……………………………………………………………………… 16 Humboldt Formation correlate …………………………………………………………………… 16 Clark Group correlate, Snake River Valley (Nevada map sheet) ……………………………………………… 19 Clark Group correlate, Gallagher Plateau area (Weld map sheet) ……………………………………………… 19 Orthoquartzite (Pcq) ……………………………………………………………………………… 19 Dolomitic mudstone and
    [Show full text]
  • Derwent Valley Council Area– Community Food Access Profile
    DERWENT VALLEY COUNCIL AREA– COMMUNITY FOOD ACCESS PROFILE Introduction & disclaimer – This profile have been developed by the Heart Foundation Tasmania as part of the Healthy Food Access Tasmania Project. The information highlighted in this profile was gathered in 2014/15 and it provides an overview for the local government area. For any questions or additional information please contact the Heart Foundation. Why does access to healthy food matter? Limited or poor access to healthy food has both health and social outcomes for people who are struggling with this issue. There are many health conditions and diseases which are associated or caused by a poor diet which results from poor economic or physical access to healthy food. The diseases include heart disease1, diabetes2, some cancers3 and other health conditions such as overweight4 and obesity5. Poor access to healthy food can cause poor physical development in children and impact their learning and attendance at school6. For adults who have poor access to healthy food it is often very stressful and causes them to be anxious and ashamed7. This often also means they avoid social occasions in their communities and with family so can become socially isolated8. How are the residents of Derwent Valley doing? Currently 34 % of adults living in Derwent Valley eat the recommended 2 pieces of fruit per day and 12 % eat the recommended 5 serves of vegetables, this compares with 42% and 9.8% for the state averages9. The Derwent Valley residents are unfortunately eating slightly less fruit and but more vegetables in 2013 when compared with 20097. For adults living in Derwent Valley 24.2% is obese7.
    [Show full text]
  • Twisted Sister Track 510 510
    730 730 640 640 410 410 470 470 680 680 450 450 630 630 440 440 460 460 700 700 520 520 600 660 600 660 690 690 420 0 420 0 540 540 5 5 4 4 490 490 440 440 530 530 560 560 560 560 670 670 720 430 430 720 650 740 650 740 5 5 710 710 550 70 550 70 730 570 570 730 500 500 610 610 590 590 620 620 450 450 440 440 480 580 480 580 Twisted Sister Track 510 510 450 450 0 0 550 550 46 46 540 590 540 590 460 460 610 610 600 630 600 630 530 530 620 620 460 460 470 470 470 470 540 540 570 570 480 480 550 5 550 5 80 80 5 5 6 6 470 470 0 0 550 550 470 470 480 480 560 560 540 540 560 560 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 57 57 48 48 0 0 5 9 0 5 9 0 470 440 470 440 450 450 5 5 5 0 5 0 600 600 430 430 590 590 610 610 460 460 480 480 520 520 the LIST State of Tasmania the LIST State of Tasmania 620 620 01500001250500,000 ,000 Meters Meters Region: Southern Tasmania Experience: Forest, swamp Suggested time: Loop walk – 20 minutes Loop walk distance: 1.5km Difficulty: Moderate This is an easy walk through deep rainforest, huge eucalypts and a small wetland. This short loop around the base of the soaring Eucalyptus regnans tree, known as Twisted Sister, takes you on an enchanting tour of some of the State’s finest southern forest features.
    [Show full text]
  • By A. N. Lewis, LL.D. the Field Work Which Has Resulted in the Eoltection
    PAP & Eo)'. Soc. 1 By A. N. LEWiS, LL.D. PLATES VH-X The field work which has resulted in the eoltection of the data here set out was undertaken in the first plate in an endeavour to find a definite fioor of the pel'mian sedimentary sequence in order to measure the ve rtieal succession, a searth which has now been prosecuted by the writer over the whole island, without "ut-cess, In the course of this investigation some remains of trilobites were found in rocks previously mapped as penno-cal'bonifel'ous. This fi.nd nmderecl desirable a further investigation into the stratigl'aphkal position and relationship of these beds and has lead to the discoveries here reeonled. The Tyenna Valley is the area with the easipst aeeess from Hobart where lower pahteozoie Toeks outel'op and is a .iunetion area between the dolerite ealJIled plateaux of the eentre and south-east and the older rocks of the western mining fields. Such areas are "ita! to the interpretation of the sequenee of geological events in Tasmania and the one here described is the TYlOst readily aceessible of slieh areas. Further, the neighbouring areas of Adamsfield to the west, the Mt. Anne and the 'Weld Hiver Valley to the south-west, M 1. Field Plateau to the east and the Flon'ntine VaHey to the north have aheady been the ~ubject of more or Ies~' detailed geological investigation. The district descl'ibr,d hen' abuts on those an;Cts and provides an essential (:nnnection without which the ac:eounts already published aJ'e de1lcient in scope.
    [Show full text]
  • Derwent Valley Council — Annual Report 2010-2011 Derwent Valley Council
    Derwent Valley Council — Annual Report 2010-2011 Derwent Valley Council Annual Report 2010/2011 Page 1 Derwent Valley Council — Annual Report 2010-2011 Table of Contents A Message from the Mayor ............................................................................... 4 A Message from the General Manager ............................................................. 6 A Snapshot of the Derwent Valley ................................................................... 7 Council’s Performance ..................................................................................... 9 Strategic Plan ............................................................................................................ 11 Community Services ................................................................................................... 13 Partnership Agreement ............................................................................................... 16 Elected Members ........................................................................................................ 18 Committees of Council ................................................................................................ 19 Council Structure ........................................................................................................ 20 Organisation Chart ...................................................................................................... 20 Number and Nature of Complaints Received ............................................................. 21
    [Show full text]
  • Gadtech Materials Pty Ltd, Sunshine Quarry, Maydena, Environmental Impact Statement, Prepared by Van Diemen Consulting, Dated 8 March 2021
    Environmental Assessment Report Sunshine Quarry ML 2065P/M, Maydena Gadtech Materials Pty Ltd August 2021 Environmental Assessment Report – Gadtech Materials Pty Ltd – Sunshine Quarry, Maydena 1 Environmental Assessment Report Proponent Gadtech Materials Pty Ltd Proposal Sunshine Quarry Location Maydena, mining lease 2065P/M NELMS no. PCE No. 10458 Permit Application No. DA30/2020 (Derwent Valley Council) Electronic Folder No. EN-EM-EV-DE-259945 Document No. D21-127936 Class of Assessment 2B Assessment Process Milestones 26 February 2020 Permit Application submitted to Council 22 June 2020 Application received by the Board 30 July 2020 Guidelines Issued 13 March 2021 Start of public consultation period 15 April 2021 End of public consultation period 25 April 2021 Additional supplementary information submitted to the Board 30 April 2021 Final supplementary information received 2 August 2021 Date draft conditions issued to proponent 17 June 2021 Statutory period for assessment ended Environmental Assessment Report – Gadtech Materials Pty Ltd – Sunshine Quarry, Maydena 2 Acronyms Board Board of the Environment Protection Authority CFEV Conservation of Freshwater Ecosystem Values (database) DPIPWE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment EIA Environmental impact assessment EIS Environmental Impact Statement EMPC Act Environmental Management and Pollution Control Act 1994 EMPCS Environmental management and pollution control system EPBC Act Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cth) FPA Forest
    [Show full text]
  • Maydena – Rise and Fall of a Logging Town 1
    Maydena – Rise and Fall of a Logging Town 1 Peter MacFie, Dulcot, Tasmania This paper investigates the formative years of Australian Newsprint Mills (ANM), centred around the construction of the Boyer Mill on the Derwent River in 1940 and the logging town of Maydena constructed in 1948. Planning for the company’s logging operation in the Styx, Tyenna and Florentine Valleys in southern Tasmania, began in 1934, resulting in a large Concession being approved by Parliament for these areas. A controversial addition was the addition of over 3,000 acres under Mt Field West, pushed through parliament by the Ogilvie Government in 1950. The purpose built logging town of Maydena became the bush HQ, where innovations in forest management were attempted. The new company introduced trained foresters and other managers who managed skilled local bushmen with a sawmilling background. The impact of the new culture on the old was effectively the colonising of a valley, and the sociology of the valley is also investigated.1 In 1996, I undertook the Maydena Project for Forest Management, a Division of ANM.2 The oral history-based study aimed at recording the social and industrial history of a purpose built logging town, centred around the extraction of old growth forest from ANM's large Concession centred on the Florentine Valley.3 Over a two year period, over 80 former employees and their spouses were interviewed.4 They included fallers, machine operators, high-lead riggers, mechanics, drivers, managers, clerks and foresters.5 During the course of the Project it became apparent that I was examining a human as well as a physical landscape, with the one interacting and shaping the other in a mutual - but not always compatible - way.6 This paper is drawn from the research for a forth-coming book on the ANM Maydena Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Deposition and Diagenesis of the Early Permian Lower Parmeener Supergroup Limestones, Tasmania
    Deposition and Diagenesis of the Early Permian Lower Parmeener Supergroup Limestones, Tasmania Becky Rogala A thesis submitted to the Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada April, 2008 Copyright © Becky Rogala, 2008 ASTRACT The Lower Parmeener Supergroup consists of 500 to 900 metres of marine and terrigenous sedimentary rocks, deposited in the high-latitude Tasmania Basin during the late Carboniferous to middle Permian, at the end of the late Paleozoic ice age. Two bioclastic carbonate units, the Darlington and Berriedale limestones, are of particular interest due to their formation in this polar, cold-water environment. Both limestones contain ice-rafted debris scattered throughout, signifying numerous icebergs, and are under- and over-lain by glendonitic siltstone indicating near-freezing seawater. Despite the unusual environment, seawater in the Permian Tasmania Basin was, with the exception of an anomalously high δ13C value, isotopically and chemically similar to modern seawater. These limestones consist of a high-abundance, low-diversity heterozoan assemblage, dominated by large, robust brachiopods, bryozoans, and Eurydesma bivalves. Sponge spicules and crinoids are locally important constituents. The carbonates are interpreted to have been deposited in mid-shelf environments during sea-level highstands, where the faunal communities were beyond the depths of grounding icebergs, and sufficiently outboard from terrigenous sediment influx and brackish water. Growth and preservation of biogenic carbonates were promoted by up-welling of nutrient-rich water, which sustained high levels of primary productivity in the water column and phosphate concentrations in the sediment.
    [Show full text]
  • Explanatory Report for the Maydena, Skeleton, Nevada, Weld and Picton Geological Map Sheets
    Mineral Resources Tasmania Department of Infrastructure, Energy and Resources 1:25 000 Scale Digital Geological Map Series — Explanatory Report 1 — Explanatory Report for the Maydena, Skeleton, Nevada, Weld and Picton geological map sheets by C. R. Calver, S. M. Forsyth and J. L. Everard July 2007 ISBN 0 7246 4018 5 Mineral Resources Tasmania PO Box 56 Rosny Park Tasmania 7018 Phone: (03) 6233 8377 l Fax: (03) 6233 8338 Email: [email protected] l Internet: www.mrt.tas.gov.au While every care has been taken in the preparation of this report, no warranty is given as to the correctness of the information and no liability is accepted for any statement or opinion or for any error or omission. No reader should act or fail to act on the basis of any material contained herein. Readers should consult professional advisers. As a result the Crown in Right of the State of Tasmania and its employees, contractors and agents expressly disclaim all and any liability (including all liability from or attributable to any negligent or wrongful act or omission) to any persons whatsoever in respect of anything done or omitted to be done by any such person in reliance whether in whole or in part upon any of the material in this report. 2 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY………………………………………………………………………… 5 GEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW …………………………………………………………………… 9 Previous work………………………………………………………………………………… 9 Proterozoic successions ……………………………………………………………………… 9 Cambrian successions ………………………………………………………………………… 11 Cambrian mafic-ultramafic complexes ………………………………………………………… 15 Cambrian
    [Show full text]