DOCSLIB.ORG

A Tudománykommunikáció Nem Hagyományos Színterei

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Tudománykommunikáció Nem Hagyományos Színterei A TUDOMÁNYKOMMUNIKÁCIÓ NEM HAGYOMÁNYOS SZÍNTEREI Egyed László Mécs Anna Neumann Viktor Palugyai István XML to PDF by RenderX XEP XSL-FO F ormatter, visit us at http://www.renderx.com/ A TUDOMÁNYKOMMUNIKÁCIÓ NEM HAGYOMÁNYOS SZÍNTEREI írta Egyed László, Mécs Anna, Neumann Viktor, és Palugyai István a kötetet szerkesztette:: Palugyai István lektor:: Szentgyörgyi Zsuzsa a nyomtatott változat grafikai szerkesztője:: Fábik Máté Szerzői jog © 2012 Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem E könyv kutatási és oktatási célokra szabadon használható. Bármilyen formában való sokszorosítása a jogtulajdonos írásos engedélyéhez kötött. Készült a TÁMOP-4.1.2.A/1-11/1-2011-0073 számú, „E-learning természettudományos tartalomfejlesztés az ELTE TTK-n” című projekt keretében. Konzorciumvezető: Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem, konzorciumi tagok: ELTE TTK Hallgatói Alapítvány, ITStudy Hungary Számítástechnikai Oktató- és Kutatóközpont Kft. XML to PDF by RenderX XEP XSL-FO F ormatter, visit us at http://www.renderx.com/ Tartalom I. Bevezető ................................................................................................................................... 1 II. A tudománykommunikáció hagyományos színterei ........................................................................... 4 A tudománykommunikáció alfája és ómegája – a tudományos újságírás ............................................ 4 Tudománnyal foglalkozó fontosabb hazai médiaműhelyek ............................................................. 6 I) Írott sajtó ................................................................................................................... 6 II) Elektronikus média .................................................................................................... 8 III) Online média .......................................................................................................... 10 A legfontosabb tudományos újságíró szervezetek ....................................................................... 10 A klasszikus tudományos ismeretterjesztő előadások ................................................................... 11 Irodalomjegyzék .................................................................................................................. 12 Kérdések ............................................................................................................................ 12 III. A nem hagyományos Tudománykommunikációs formák ................................................................. 16 III./1. Science Café – kávézói diskurzusok kutatókkal .................................................................. 16 Története, filozófiája ..................................................................................................... 16 A Science Café menete .................................................................................................. 20 Science Café világszerte ................................................................................................ 21 Cikkek, tanulmányok .................................................................................................... 24 Kérdések .................................................................................................................... 24 III./2. Tudományos viták (Science Debate) ................................................................................ 25 Mi a Science Debate és miért van szükség rá? .................................................................... 25 Az elnökválasztás tudományos vitái – az USA-beli indulás ................................................... 27 Szavazások, statisztikák ................................................................................................. 28 A német Science Debate ................................................................................................ 30 A Magyar helyzet ......................................................................................................... 31 Összegzés ................................................................................................................... 32 Kérdések .................................................................................................................... 32 III./3. Komplex tudománykommunikációs projektek ................................................................... 33 Miért van szükség komplex megközelítésre? ...................................................................... 33 A francia Mindentudás Egyeteme .................................................................................... 34 A magyar Mindentudás Egyeteme ................................................................................... 34 Németország: Nationales Institut für Wissenschaftskommunikation ........................................ 36 Írország – STEPS ......................................................................................................... 36 TED Talks - globálisan a tudományért! ............................................................................. 37 Kérdések .................................................................................................................... 38 Irodalomjegyzék .......................................................................................................... 38 III./4. A közösségi média lehetséges szerepe a tudománykommunikációban ..................................... 38 A nyilvánosság átalakulása ............................................................................................. 38 Mi az a webkettő? ........................................................................................................ 40 A közösségi média használata ......................................................................................... 41 Cikkek, oldalak ............................................................................................................ 44 A közösségi média és az újságírók ................................................................................... 44 Példák a közösségi médiában történő oktatásra, tudománykommunikációra ............................. 48 Cikkek, tanulmányok .................................................................................................... 51 Kérdések .................................................................................................................... 52 III./5. Tudományos fesztiválok, a tudományok hete ..................................................................... 54 Rövid történet .............................................................................................................. 54 A tudományos fesztivál jellemzői .................................................................................... 55 A tudományos fesztiválok szerepe ................................................................................... 55 A tudományos fesztiválok hatása ..................................................................................... 57 A tudományos fesztiválok szervezetei .............................................................................. 57 Tudományfesztiválok országonként ................................................................................. 58 Kérdések .................................................................................................................... 65 Irodalomjegyzék .......................................................................................................... 65 III./6. Science centerek – interaktív tudományos élményközpontok /játszóházak .............................. 66 A science centerek missziója .......................................................................................... 66 iii XML to PDF by RenderX XEP XSL-FO F ormatter, visit us at http://www.renderx.com/ A TUDOMÁNYKOMMUNIKÁCIÓ NEM HAGYOMÁNYOS SZÍNTEREI A célközönség ............................................................................................................. 67 A bemutatók, kiállítások célja ......................................................................................... 68 Az oktatásban betöltött szerep ......................................................................................... 68 A science centerek története ........................................................................................... 71 Néhány további tematikus science center .......................................................................... 72 A Csodák Palotája – az első magyarországi science center .................................................... 74 Kommunikáció ............................................................................................................ 77 Kérdések .................................................................................................................... 78 IV. További kihívások, lehetőségek a tudománykommunikáció területén ................................................. 81 Okostelefon alkalmazások ...................................................................................................... 81 Kémiai elemek a zsebben ............................................................................................... 81 Univerzum a zsebben .................................................................................................... 81 Tudományos egypercesek .............................................................................................. 81 Dinó-mánia ................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Outspoken Recently Authorized the Move and Negotiated a Multi-Year Lease
    NEW DPLC OFFICE IN DOWNTOWN SPRINGFIELD May 2008 DPLC MOVES TO NEW OFFICE SPACE COMMUNITY AT 826 A STREET IN SPRINGFIELD EQUALITY PROSPERITY THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY DPLC volunteers have moved our office from OF LANE North Eugene to a new office space at 826 A COUNTY St. in Springfield. The Executive Committee outspoken recently authorized the move and negotiated www.dplc.org a multi-year lease. The new office is in a very visible downtown Democratic Party of Lane County location near the Post Office and the EMX 826 A St., Springfield, Oregon 97477 P.O. Box 11138, Eugene, Oregon 97440-3338 transit line which runs from Eugene. The Office Hours: Tues & Thurs from 9 am-noon previous tenant was the Springfield Beacon. Email: [email protected] With a total of 1,342 sq. ft., there are 7 rooms, Phone: 541-484-5099 | Fax: 541-762-1081 wiring for high speed internet connectivity, Website: www.dplc.org and 8 phone lines. The largest room measures IN THIS ISSUE 11.5” x 26” and is perfect for holding DPLC Moves to New Office Space 1 committee meetings. Keep Your Eye on the November Prize 2 LTD’s EmX operates from 6 am to 11 pm You’re Invited to Two Election Parties 2 on weekdays. It takes about 16 minutes to Candidates Encouraged to Debate 3 travel from downtown Eugene to downtown Get Out and Volunteer 3 Springfield. There is no charge to ride. Dorthy Craig Update 3 In Memorium: Bruce Rose 4 Thanks to all our volunteers who helped find the space and organize the move! An Open House is being planned for shortly after the May 20th election.
    [Show full text]
  • Amstatnews Advertising Directory
    January 2009 • Issue #379 AMSTAT The Membership MagazineNEWS of the American Statistical Association Salary Survey of Biostatistics and Other Biomedical Statistics Departments and Units ALSO: ASA Supports Independence of Census Bureau CAUSE Reports Fun, Fun, Fun Publications Agreement No. 41544521 JANUARY 2009 • IssUe #379 Executive Director Ron Wasserstein: [email protected] Associate Executive Director and Director of Operations F eATURes Stephen Porzio: [email protected] Director of Programs 3 President’s Corner Martha Aliaga: [email protected] 4 Distance Graduate Program Rated a ‘Best Buy’ Director of Science Policy 4 PIRe Accepting Partnership Proposals Steve Pierson: [email protected] 5 AsA supports Independence of Census Bureau Managing Editor Megan Murphy: [email protected] 6 Agent-Based Modeling explores Challenges to Theory, science Production Coordinators/Graphic Designers Melissa Muko: [email protected] Lidia Vigyázó: [email protected] 7 NsF, CBMs Announce Conference series Publications Coordinator Val Snider: [email protected] Advertising Manager Claudine Donovan: [email protected] Contributing Staff Members Amy Farris • Rick Peterson • Eric Sampson • Kathleen Wert Amstat News welcomes news items and letters from readers on matters AsA supports of interest to the association and the profession. Address correspondence Independence of Census Bureau to Managing Editor, Amstat News, American Statistical Association, 732 North Washington Street, Alexandria VA 22314-1943 USA, or email p. 5 [email protected]. Items must be received by the first day of the preced- ing month to ensure appearance in the next issue (for example, June 1 for the July issue). Material can be sent as a Microsoft Word document, PDF, or within an email.
    [Show full text]
  • One Laptop & One Big Hope
    Green Technology Innovation inOne the Laptop United &States: One big hope The Obama Administration’s Juan Carlos Capuñay AmbitiousExecutive Director, APEC Program and its Prospects Albert H. Teich* ABSTRACT The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), known widely as the “stimulus” bill, developed by the U.S. Congress and President-elect Obama in late 2008 and early 2009, is investing a significant portion of its $787 billion infusion of funds in future-oriented pro- grams intended not only to “jump-start” the stalled American economy, but to promote the development of renewable energy sources and increase energy efficiency in appliances, build- ings, transportation, and other sectors of the economy. These investments are expected both to create immediate employment in green industries and to build a more sustainable society in the long term. The Obama Administration’s green energy initiatives are part of a larger emphasis on science and technology within its agenda. It has roots in the Obama campaign and is supported by an unusually strong science and technology team. Much of the activity is centered in the De- partment of Energy, which received a huge one-time increase in its fiscal year 2009 budget to support the new and expanded programs. Areas that have been neglected by the federal gov- ernment R&D program for many years, including smart grid technology, solar, wind, and geothermal energy, received large boosts. Many of these programs – and, in fact, the broader concept of government involvement in commercial innovation – are politically controversial Previous attempts to expand research in these areas by liberal Democratic administrations and Congresses have been criticized and sometimes thwarted by conservatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Science in the Presidential Campaign and the Obama Administration
    Science Policy News Science in the Presidential Campaign and the Obama Administration steve Pierson, AsA Director of science Policy Indeed, both candidates were expressing support for science in 2007 campaign appearances. Standing in front of a sign reading “reclaiming our commit- ment to science and technology,” Clinton vowed to end the war on science, citing that it was about more than security and the economy. “It is about democracy,” she said. For his part, Obama replied to a question about science policy, saying, “We’ve seen a decline in real dollar terms in our investment in science and tech- nology at precisely the time in which our economy is going to ultimately be dependent on our abil- ity to maintain our technological edge.” He then pledged to significantly increase funding for NIH and NSF, honor science’s independence, and rein- vigorate K–12 education in science and technol- ogy. Obama noted that his first visit to the Google campus in 2004 was inspiration for the chapter on innovation in his second book, The Audacity of Hope. Obama reiterated his support for science, inno- long, intense presidential campaign is final- vation, and technology in late 2007, addressing an ly behind us and a new president is ahead. audience at Google’s Mountain View campus, say- Science arguably had a higher profile in the ing, “We can use technology to help achieve univer- A2008 campaign than in any other modern presiden- sal health care, to reach for a clean energy future, and tial campaign, and President-elect Barack Obama to ensure that young Americans compete and win in emerged as the most vocal pro-science president the global economy.
    [Show full text]
  • New Pathways in U.S. Innovation Policy Technology Policy International
    New Pathways in U.S. Innovation Policy Report to NEDO George R. Heaton, Jr. Christopher T. Hill Patrick Windham David W. Cheney May 2008 Technology Policy International www.technopoli.net An International Consultancy with Representatives in Boston, Washington, Silicon Valley and Tokyo New Pathways in U.S. Innovation Policy p. i Abstract TPI’s May 2007 report to NEDO, Innovation Policy Today in the United States: The Mainstream Consensus and Other Views , summarized the mainstream consensus viewpoint on U.S. innovation policy that was then popular in Washington. This viewpoint was based on an October 2005 report, Rising Above The Gathering Storm: Energizing and Employing America for a Brighter Economic Future. The report called for more government funding for basic research in the physical sciences and engineering, more funding for science and engineering education, and tax credits for corporate research and development. These recommendations generally are non-controversial in the U.S., which helps account for their popularity. Both President Bush and the Democrat-controlled Congress endorsed the main recommendations in Gathering Storm, and their support led to the enactment of a new law based on the report, the America COMPETES Act (U.S. Public Law 110-69), signed by the President on August 9, 2007. However, as TPI’s 2007 report pointed out, there are good reasons to believe that the actions recommended by Gathering Storm , while valuable, are incomplete and not sufficient to ensure good American jobs and strong economic competitiveness in the new world economy. During the latter part of 2007 and into 2008, various American analysts have begun to suggest additional steps that are needed to update U.S.
    [Show full text]