LIGHT DUTY TRUCK WEIGHT REDUCTION EVALUATION I J-'Dr-^Rr- R Nri * | I MENT N ;V ^ I J, J -CATION I

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LIGHT DUTY TRUCK WEIGHT REDUCTION EVALUATION I J-'Dr-^Rr- R Nri * | I MENT N ;V ^ I J, J -CATION I . 6 Mb' I 8.5 . A34 no DOT- TSC- -NHTSA-80-7 DOT- HS- 805 538 NHTSA- 80-7 LIGHT DUTY TRUCK WEIGHT REDUCTION EVALUATION i j-'Dr-^rr- r nri * | i MENT n ;v ^ I j, j -CATION i 5 1981 0. Viergutz M. Nusbaum I library w^asseu W . Fi 1 1 ma n C . Hales G . Waring I IT RESEARCH INSTITUTE 10 West 35 Street Chicago IL 6061 OCTOBER 1980 FINAL REPORT DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH THE NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE, SPRINGFIELD, VIRGINIA 22161 Prepared for: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Office of Research and Development Washington DC 20590 . NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof NOTICE The United States Government does not endorse pro- ducts or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturer’s names appear herein solely because they are con- sidered essential to the object of this report. NOTICE The views and conclusions contained in the document are those of the author(s) and should not be inter- preted as necessarily representing the official policies or opinions, either expressed or implied, of the Department of Transportation. Technical Report Documentation Page 1 . Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. DOT-HS-805 538 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date LIGHT DUTY TRUCK WEIGHT REDUCTION EVALUATION October 1980 6. Performing Organization Code 8, Performing Organization Report No. 7. Author's) o. Viergutz, M. Nusbaum, W. Fillman, C. Hales, G. Waring DOT-TSC-NHTSA-80-7 9. Performing Organization Name and Address — -• ,10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) T^r \ : — jj IIT Research Institute* ’ HS052/R0147 | LX' A 4 ; .1 ) •H Wl A W: ! 10 West 35th Street 11. Contract or Grant No. Chicago IL 60616 | DOT-TSC-1467 hi AT Y I'9d 1 | 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Final Report U.S. Department of Transportation UBFtaRY Dec. 1977-Nov. 1978 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Office of Research and Development 14. Sponsoring Ageney Code Washington DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes U. S . Department of Transportation Research and Special Programs Administration *Under contract to Transportation Systems Center Cambridge MA 02142 16. Abstract The objective of this program is to identify the weight reduction potential of pickup trucks, vans, and utility vehicles less than or equal to 8500 lb. gross vehicle weight through design modification, redesign, and material substitution. The subobjectives inherent in this statement of the overall objective are: the documentation and characterization of the existing world light truck fleet; the identification of the currently most weight efficient light truck; the identifica- tion of the currently most weight efficient light truck; the identification of ac- ceptable reductions in vehicle function; the evaluation of the potential for material substitution; the potential for redesign consistent with 1985 technology; and the documentation of the optimum weight efficient state of the art light duty truck (LDT). 17. Key Words 18. Distribution Statement Light Duty Truck, Market Acceptance, DOCUMENT IS AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC Weight Reduction, Vehicle Redesign, THROUGH THE N ATI ON A L TECHN I C A L INFORMATION SE R V I CE SP R I NG F I E L Weight Efficient, Material Substitution , D, VIRGINIA 22161 19. Security Classif. (of this report) 20. Security Classif. (of this page) 21. No. of P ages 22. Price 233 Unclass if ied Unclassified (8-72) Form DOT F 1700.7 Reproduction of completed page authorized . .. PREFACE This final report is submitted by I IT Research Institute (IITRI) under contract to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Transportation Systems Center in support of the Automotive Fuel Economy program. The weight reduction evaluation herein pre- sented for light duty trucks was conducted under Contract DOT-TSC-1467 The program manager and principal investigator for this project was Mr. Owen J. Viergutz, P.E. Major contributing effort was supplied by Messrs. M. Nusbaum, W. Fillman, C. Hales, and G. Waring. Other individuals who deserve recognition include D. Hanify, G„ Ebey, K. Norikane, L. Barbarek, C. Schramm and Ms. D. Hooper. Additionally the authors wish to acknowledge the assistance provided by Mr. W. Tanner, Consultant for the auto- motive indus try A major portion of this program was subcontracted to the Fiat Research Center of Orbassano, Turin, Italy. The program manager for Fiat was Mr. R. Piccolo. Major participants in this program were: M. DeRossi, P. Castelli, L. Morello, R. Muratori and , R. Leonardis Special appreciation is expressed to Dr. Hsi-Sheng Hsia and H. Gould of the Transportation Systems Center for their coopera- tion and support which helped to maintain the intensive program schedule Finally we would like to acknowledge the contributions of individuals in the industry to support our technology assessment. Specifically we would like to thank: Ford Motor Company Chrysler Motors L. V. Farago R. 0. Sorenson M. A. Wheeler W. L. Dornbrack F. N. Parrill c. Connelly S . G. Lyons B. H . S imp s on F. J. Baccari iii . .. PREFACE This final report is submitted by IIT Research Institute (IITRI) under contract to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Transportation Systems Center in support of the Automotive Fuel Economy program. The weight reduction evaluation herein pre- sented for light duty trucks was conducted under Contract DOT-TSC- 1467 The program manager and principal investigator for this project was Mr. Owen J. Viergutz, P.E. Major contributing effort was supplied by Messrs. M. Nusbaum, W. Fillman, C. Hales, and G. Waring. Other individuals who deserve recognition include D. Hanify, G. Ebey, K. Norikane, L. Barbarek, C. Schramm and Ms. D. Hooper. Additionally the authors wish to acknowledge the assistance provided by Mr. W. Tanner, Consultant for the auto- motive industry. A major portion of this program was subcontracted to the Fiat Research Center of Orbassano, Turin, Italy. The program manager for Fiat was Mr. R. Piccolo. Major participants in this program were: M. DeRossi, P. Castelli, L. Morello, R. and Muratori , R. Leonardis Special appreciation is expressed to Dr. Hsi-Sheng Hsia and H. Gould of the Transportation Systems Center for their coopera- tion and support which helped to maintain the intensive program schedule Finally we would like to acknowledge the contributions of individuals in the industry to support our technology assessment. Specifically we would like to thank: Ford Motor Company Chrysler Motors L. V. Farago R. O. Sorenson M. A. Wheeler W. L. Dornbrack F. N. Parrill C. Connelly S. G. Lyons B . H . S imp s on F. J. Baccari 111 . General Motors Corporation Daimler-Benz A. G. C. A. Matson G. Wolters A. Stenglein Renault-Saviem Volkswagen Werk G. Mercier R. Schmidt C. Lanchec Vauxhall -Bedford J. Wedge Considerable ffort was devoted to the thoughtful response to our investigations. The comments acquired provided a meaning- ful insight into the industry's concern for weight efficiency. The shifting national energy consumption pattern and the increasing emphasis placed upon improving automotive efficiency is of utmost concern to the industry and research communities alike. The automotive industry is actively engaged in a major realignment of its automotive and light duty truck lines to im- prove efficiency. In order to achieve these Government mandated fuel economy standards the industry must continue to aggressive- ly pursue every available technological avenue. This report attempts to identify the potential for improving the weight efficiency of the light duty truck fleet while main- taining the utility and marketability of the vehicles. Of prin- cipal concern to this determination was the characterization of market acceptance of improved efficiency vehicles and the deriva- tion of functional requirements for specific vehicle missions. In the development of design and material substitution op- tions available to the 1985 vehicle manufacturers it was important that the perspective technology be critically selected. The in- dustry as a whole has a wide variety of technological options available. However, any single manufacturer is limited to avail- able in-house technology. As the in-place plant is replaced new technology may be incorporated, but the introduction of this technology is contingent upon normal production equipment life cycles IV It is apparent that new technology will need to be intro- duced in an accelerated manner if the mandated fuel economies are to be achieved. The economic tradeoff between on the road efficiency improvements and the cost of obtaining these economies is a critical issue. This report identifies technologically feasible weight efficiency improvements and first order cost im- pacts. It remains unanswered if the level of weight reduction achievable warrants the expenditure required. This report is being submitted in an effort to identify potential weight reduction options and levels of improvement. We feel confident that the results presented herein represent a thorough assessment of the industry's ability to manufacture and the consumer's willingness to accept improved weight efficient light duty trucks. v . K. <1.". S £ _ „ s t i :SSit?g • • 1 2 9 1 E .11 •I s Sou M.i.ur.s 2 X t y- T . = .o a C £ i I & S 8 M.trie f.om Conv.r.ion. App.oxim.t. 5 il 91 SI 9 1“- iniliii mi mi mi mi -Zf - Ve"e1 5 EE I * { is ! £ E I 2 I S I ? j . i 1 i s • • • • s 5 | !! • m 2 5 3 j 3 3 3 3 U il| Mo.su... l 5 f 1 S sr sr y i 6>i 2 E E E ~ - M.t.ic t S to « N tf) CO vO 1 » H> 8 • • N ^ ® o o' it o n ci Ui VT O O o o o' 6 9> £ — \ 3 *Nt tf) * M Conv.r.ion.
Recommended publications
  • Ka2763 Daiha Sirion 昌王 Ka2123 Toyota 12R,4K/Km20 Toyota
    KA2763 DAIHA SIRION KA2123 TOYOTA 12R,4K/KM20 TOYOTA LEICESTR KA2137 TOYOTA YH50/2Y,HAICE LITEACE YH50/2Y KA2142 TOYOTA RY30 ONE TRUCK MITSUBISHI FUSO+Trucks KA2136 HINO+Trucks TOYOTA+Fork LiFts W 14B KA2128 TOYOTA KA2152 TOYOTA COMMUTER KA2185 GRANVIA,HI-ACE,REGIUS TURING HIACE TOYOTA LS120 KA2149 PICKUPL4 2.4L 2366cc SUPRA KA2143 TOYOTA MODELL F KA2147 LAND CRUISER L6 4.5L KA2714 CHARADE G10 EXCL TURBO KA2139 PICKUP L4 2.4L Diesel ISUZU Trooper UBS52 KA2170 HIACE 4Y 4y KA2140 LAND CRUISER MIDI CADY KA2113 LAND CRUISER KA2104 TOYOTA JEEP 3400 3400 5VZFE,VZJ95 KA2135 STRALET DAIHA-CHARMANT COROLLA KA2188 LAND CRUISER 30D-43 DFJ80-2F/JEEP4500 30d-43 DFJ80-2F/4500 KA21038 JEEP 4700 JJ100/IZUFE V8 4700 JJ100 V8 KA2109 COROLLA L4 1.1L 1077cc STARLETL4 1.3L 1290cc KA2182A TOYOTA TOWN ACE KA2523 TOYOTA T100TRUCK ISUZU T100 V KA21016 TOYOTA PRADO 4.0 FJ CRUISER DAIHATSU KA810159 PRIUS KA2154 TOYOTA HULIUX KA2184 TOYOTA KA2167 TOYOTA CONFORT CROWN 5R 22R MARKII,CHASER KA2131 HIULUX KA2130 TOYOTA HIULUX KA2190 CROWN 2.8M S132/5M KA2125 COSTER2000 DYNA2000 MARKII 18R CRESTA KA2164A TOYOTA KA1054 OPTI MIRA COURE TOYOTA KA2153A STARLET 1.3/2EELU.2E cultus1.0,1.3G10T Z KA2148 TOYOTA LITEACE WAGON KA2105 GS300 KA21014 PRUIUS KA2103 CARINA E AVENSIS LIFTBACK AVENSIS KA2122 AVENSIS LIFTBACK CARINA AVENSIS STATION WAGON KA2110 TOYOTA KA810257 HIGHLANDER HYBRID RX 400h KA21022 LEXUS RAV4 II 2.2D-4D RAV4 II 2.2D-CAT KA2151 AVENSIS AVENSIS LIFTBACK PREVIA RAV4 II KA2127 HILUX SURF LAND CRUISER KA2193 MARK II CHASER CRESTA KA2147N DYNA AUTOBUS DYNA
    [Show full text]
  • La Storia Del Logo Fiat
    La storia del logo Fiat Fiat Automobiles Nazione Italia Tipologia Società per azioni Fondazione 1899 a Torino Sede principale Torino Gruppo Fiat SpA (tramite Fiat Group Automobiles) Persone chiave Olivier François, Direttore operativo Settore Metalmeccanica (Autoveicoli) Prodotti autovetture Slogan Life is best when driven Sito web www.fiat.it La FIAT (nata come acronimo di Fabbrica Italiana Automobili Torino), nota come Fiat Automobiles negli Stati Uniti, è stata fondata l'11 luglio 1899 a Torino come casa produttrice di automobili, per poi sviluppare la propria attività in numerosi altri settori, dando vita al più importante gruppo finanziario e industriale privato italiano. Dal 1º febbraio 2007 fa parte, insieme ai marchi Alfa Romeo, Lancia, Abarth e Fiat Professional, di Fiat Group Automobiles (abbreviato in FGA) che rappresenta una delle diramazioni del gruppo industriale Fiat SpA. Storia e direzione aziendale L'azienda nacque dalla comune volontà di una decina tra aristocratici, possidenti, imprenditori e professionisti torinesi di impiantare una fabbrica per la produzione di automobili. L'idea di produrre automobili su scala industriale era venuta agli amici Emanuele Cacherano di Bricherasio e Cesare Goria Gatti (già fondatori dell'ACI Automobile Club d'Italia) che avevano precedentemente costituito e finanziato la "Accomandita Ceirano & C.", finalizzata alla costruzione della "Welleyes", un'automobile progettata dall'ing. Aristide Faccioli e costruita artigianalmente da Giovanni Battista Ceirano. Visto il successo ottenuto dalla "Welleyes" alla sua presentazione, Bricherasio e Gatti proposero ad un gruppo di conoscenti di acquisire le esperienze, le maestranze e la competenza della "Accomandita Ceirano & C." per trasferirle su scala industriale, come già avveniva nella fabbriche dell'Europa settentrionale.
    [Show full text]
  • I Camion Italiani Dalle Origini Agli Anni Ottanta
    I camion italiani dalle origini agli anni Ottanta AISA Associazione Italiana per la Storia dell’Automobile MONOGRAFIA AISA 124 I I camion italiani dalle origini agli anni Ottanta AISA - Associazione Italiana per la Storia dell’Automobile Brescia, Fondazione Negri, 19 ottobre 2019 3 Prefazione Lorenzo Boscarelli 4 I camion italiani Massimo Condolo 15 Nasce l’autocarro italiano Antonio Amadelli Didascalia MONOGRAFIA AISA 124 1 Prefazione Lorenzo Boscarelli l camion è nato pochi anni dopo l’automobile e se di rado frutto di progetti originali, ma fruitori in buo- Ine è ben presto differenziato, per soluzioni costrut- na parte di componenti – innanzitutto il motore – di tive, dimensioni e quant’altro. Potremmo chiederci origine camionistica. Un comparto particolare sono perché si ebbe quel sia pur breve “ritardo”; un motivo le macchine movimento terra, per l’iniziale sviluppo con ogni probabilità fu che per i pionieri dell’auto- dei quali tra i paesi europei un ruolo importante ha mobile era molto più attraente fornire un mezzo di avuto l’Italia. trasporto a persone, suscitando curiosità e di diverti- La varietà degli utilizzi dei camion, da veicolo com- mento, piuttosto che offrire uno strumento per il tra- patto per consegne cittadine o di prossimità a mezzo sporto di cose. Un secondo motivo fu senza dubbio la per trasporti di grande portata, da veicolo stradale a limitatissima potenza che avevano i primi motori per mezzo da cantiere, da antincendio a cisterna aeropor- automobili, a fine Ottocento, a stento in grado di por- tuale, e chi più ne ha più ne metta, ha prodotto una tare due o quattro passeggeri, di certo non un carico varietà di soluzioni tecniche e progettuali senza pari, significativo.
    [Show full text]
  • Determining the Viability of Electric Vehicles on Nantucket
    Determining the Viability of Electric Vehicles on Nantucket: Survey Results 14 December 2016 Authors: Joseph Abinader Anna Kjelgaard Joseph Switzer Caeli Tegan Submitted to: Ms. Lauren Sinatra Nantucket Energy Office Professor Fred Looft Professor Scott Jiusto WPI Part of an Interactive Qualifying Project submitted to the Faculty of WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science This report represents work of WPI undergraduate students submitted to the faculty as evidence of a degree requirement. WPI routinely publishes these reports on its web site without editorial or peer review. For more information about the projects program at WPI, see http://www.wpi.edu/Academics/Projects. Project Website: http://wp.wpi.edu/nantucket/projects/projects-2016/energy-office/ Appendix 6: Survey Responses These are all the responses we received in our survey. This document was exported from SurveyGizmo. Report for Electric Vehicles on Nantucket Electric Vehicles on Nantucket Response Counts Count Percent Complete 195 89.9 Partial 22 10.1 Disqualified 0 0 Total 217 Informed Consent: Value Percent Count I 100.0% 217 understand that participation in this Total 217 2 Age Group: 18-24 2% 25-34 7% 45-54 29% 35-44 16% 55-64 21% 65 or over 25% Value Percent Count 45-54 28.8% 62 65 or over 25.6% 55 55-64 20.9% 45 35-44 15.8% 34 25-34 7.0% 15 18-24 1.9% 4 Total 215 3 Gender: Male 48% Female 52% Value Percent Count Female 51.9% 110 Male 48.1% 102 Total 212 4 Residential Status: Other 3% Visitor/Commuter 14% Seasonal (Less than 6 months) 17% Year round 66% Value Percent Count Year round 66.2% 143 Seasonal (Less than 6 months) 16.7% 36 Visitor/Commuter 13.9% 30 Other 3.2% 7 Total 216 5 What type of vehicle do you primarily use on the island? I do not own a Diesel, 1.4, 1% vehicle., 1.8, 2% I do not bring a vehicle to the Hybrid, 1.8, 2% island., 7.8, 8% Plug-In Hybrid, 0.5, 1% All-Electric Vehicle, Gasoline, 84.3, 84% 2.3, 2% Value Percent Count Gasoline 84.3% 183 I do not bring a vehicle to the 7.8% 17 island.
    [Show full text]
  • Riverdale Mixed Surface
    Northwest Rally Association RallyCross – March 2, 2019 Riverdale Raceway - Mixed Surface Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Total Stock AWD Raw Time Cones Gates Total Raw Time Cones Gates Total Raw Time Cones Gates Total Raw Time Cones Gates Total Raw Time Cones Gates Total Time 826 Brandon Burgler 2001 Subaru Impreza 1:42.082 1:42.082 1:45.632 1:45.632 1:42.646 1:42.646 1:41.525 1:41.525 1:42.690 1:42.690 8:34.575 130 Eric Schwem 2005 Subaru Impreza WRX 1:46.510 1:46.510 1:42.265 1:42.265 1:44.696 1:44.696 1:42.100 1:42.100 1:40.835 1:40.835 8:36.406 454 Justin Nelson 2000 Subaru 2.5 rs impreza 1:43.870 1:43.870 1:44.516 1 1:54.516 1:43.276 1 1 1:55.276 1:41.286 1 1:43.286 1:41.936 1 1:43.936 9:00.884 60 Dale Willemse 2005 Subaru WRX 1:53.987 1 1:55.987 1:48.936 1:48.936 1:49.054 1:49.054 1:49.698 1:49.698 1:43.662 1:43.662 9:07.337 3 Dennis Ricalde 2010 Subaru Impreza 1:58.104 1:58.104 1:49.161 2 2:09.161 1:49.323 1:49.323 1:50.251 1:50.251 1:46.991 1:46.991 9:33.830 22 Dylan Hurst 2004 Subaru WRX Wagon 1:55.569 1:55.569 1:53.565 1:53.565 1:49.328 8 2:05.328 1:51.002 1:51.002 1:51.014 1:51.014 9:36.478 8 Aidan Wilson 2007 Subaru Impreza WRX 1:52.213 1 2:02.213 1:48.545 2 2:08.545 1:50.207 1:50.207 1:50.293 1:50.293 1:49.299 1 1:51.299 9:42.557 714 Krysta Burgler 2001 Subaru Impreza 1:56.029 1 1:58.029 2:03.226 1 1 2:15.226 1:58.490 1:58.490 1:51.122 1:51.122 1:52.949 1:52.949 9:55.816 111 Erik Olson 1996 Subaru Impreza L Sedan 2:13.592 3 2:43.592 1:58.603 1:58.603 1:57.629 1:57.629 1:51.748 1:51.748 1:50.093 1:50.093 10:21.665 1 Al Duffin
    [Show full text]
  • Crystal Reports
    3/31/2004 6:43:18PM Results 1 Atlanta ProSolo Feb 14-15, 2004 Sponsored by: Sports Car Club of America Pos Nb Driver's name, Tow Car, Sponsor Tire Mfg Course 1, Course 2 Score Points Stock Category Super Stock Drivers: 5 Trophies: 2 T 1 15 Hector San Nicolas 04 Chevy ZO6 Silver Hoosier 35.586 37.475(1) RL34.120 34.632 32.907 66.900 R [115] Hollywood, FL Regal Racing 36.681 44.342(3) 34.913 33.993 36.592(1) 35.416(1) 20 T 2 16 Michael Turner 02 Chevrolet Z06 Corv Hoosier 38.463 36.838 35.64834.493 37.774 34.800 70.202 Greenville, SC 41.615 39.480 37.299 37.306 36.25535.709 (3.302) 16 3 96 Jerry Onks 02 Chev Corvette Silv Hoosier 36.371(1) 36.426(1) 34.80235.694(1) 36.378(1) 35.216 70.601 Smyrna, TN Eckler's/VetteSport/RAFT 37.027 36.352 39.039(1) 36.541 36.13835.799 (0.399) 13 4 115 David Lehman 04 Chevrolet Corvette Z Hoosier 40.677(1) 36.492 36.74834.921 35.182 34.332 71.030 [15] Plantation, FL 40.787 38.423 RL 38.246 36.69836.866 (0.429) 11 68 Scott Fisler 99 Chevrolet CORVET Hoosier DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS No Time Acworth, GA DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS DNS 9 A Stock Drivers: 5 Trophies: 2 T 1 119 Larry Fine 04 Subaru STI Silver Kumho 32.458 31.765 39.886(4)32.124 33.745 33.218 64.734 [19] Addison, PA Kumho/Strano/langston 37.380(2) 32.969 33.247 34.898(1) 33.754 36.202(1) 20 T 2 170 Karen Kraus 04 Subaru Impreza WR Hoosier 39.983(3) 32.578 34.480(1)34.812(1) 37.097(1) 37.004(1) 66.555 [70] Brownsville, MD Triskelion Racing/Scott Evans 36.741(1) 37.050(1) 34.317 33.977 36.97637.248 (1.821) 16 3 19 Renee Eady 36.191 34.570 36.004(1)34.169 35.942
    [Show full text]
  • Snap Rings 1994-1997 Kia Sephia Shown Below
    SNAP RING DESIGNS & APPLICATIONS MANUFACTURER OF CONSTANT VELOCITY DRIVEAXLE COMPONENTS 1500 11TH AVENUE ROCKFORD, ILLINOIS 61104 PHONE (815) 962-1411 FAX (815) 962-4857 © 1999 Rockford Constant Velocity-Division of Aircraft Gear Corporation 1 GENUINE 161-16 ROCKFORD to CONSTANT VELOCITY 182-54 161-16 -SNAP RING 174-54 -SNAP RING 1986-1994 Honda Four Trax 1979-1997 Domestic Imports 1987-1994 Yamaha Big Bear 1985-1989 Honda Civic 1987-1994 Yamaha Kodiak 1988-1995 Hyundai Elantra,Scoupe,Sonata 1987-1994 Yamaha Timberwolf 1981-1993 Isuzu I-mark, Impulse, Trooper 1986-1997 Mazda 626,Millenia,MX3,Protege 1983-1997 Mitsubishi Cordia, Eclipse, Expo 1978-1990 Nissan 720, Pulsar, Sentra 1972-1993 Subaru Brat, Hatchback, Loyale 161-54 -SNAP RING 178-16 -SNAP RING Snap Ring 1986-1994 Honda Four Trax 1995-1998 Ford Explorer 1987-1994 Yamaha Big Bear 1992-1996 Lexus ES300 1987-1994 Yamaha Kodiak 1997-1998 Mercury Mountaineer 1987-1994 Yamaha Timberwolf 1993-1998 Mercury Villager 1993-1998 Nissan Quest 1995-1996 Toyota Avalon 1992-1996 Toyota Camry 163-16 -SNAP RING 178-53 -STUB SNAP RING 1987-1989 Chevrolet Spectrum 1993-1998 Mercury Villager 1988-1992 Diahatsu Charade 1993-1998 Nissan Quest 1990-1993 Geo Storm 1987-1989 Isuzu I-mark 1990-1993 Isuzu Stylus 1988-1989 Mazda 323 1987-1994 Subaru Justy 164-16 -SNAP RING 180-16 -SNAP RING CABINET 1983-1996 Dodge Colt Contains an assortment of the 1989-1996 Eagle Summit most popular snap rings 1994-1997 Kia Sephia shown below. 163-13C / 1985-1996 Mitsubishi Mirage 163-13S/164-13/182-13C/ 1982-1990 Nissan
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogo-Auto-Epoca-11.Pdf
    AUTORICAMBI FIRMATI PIMAX, dal 1979, sceglie i produttori più qualificati apponendo il proprio marchio. La qualità, serietà ed attenzione al cliente sono i punti che la Pimax ha mantenuto ben saldi e cercato di migliorare nel tempo. I nostri punti di forza sono la flessibilità e disponibilità verso i nostri clienti, l’ampia gamma di prodotti proposti sempre di qualità con un continuo aggiornamento di modelli volti a completare e coprire il parco circolante europeo, americano, sudamericano ed asiatico e riguardante veicoli, auto d’epoca, veicoli commerciali, camion e veicoli agricoli. Autoricambi firmati ... ampia gamma ... un solo ordine ... un solo marchio ... PIMAX BRAND AUTO PARTS PIMAX, from 1979, chooses the most qualified producers putting its own brand. The quality, seriousness and attention to the customer are the points that Pimax has kept steady and tried to improve over time. Our strengths are the flexibility and availability to our customers, the wide range of products always proposed quality with a continuous update of models aimed at completing and covering the European, American, South American and Asian circulating fleet and vehicles, vintage cars, commercial vehicles, trucks and agricultural vehicles. Wide range ... one order ... one brand ... PIMAX PIÈCES DE RECHANGE DE COUTURIER PIMAX, depuis 1979, choisit les producteurs les plus qualifiés en mettant sa propre marque. La qualité, le sérieux et l'attention au client sont les points que Pimax a maintenu et a toujours essayé d'améliorer. Nos points forts sont la flexibilité et la disponibilité pour nos clients, la large gamme de produits toujours proposée qualité avec une mise à jour continue des modèles visant à compléter et à couvrir les parcs et véhicules circulant européens, américains, sud-américains et asiatiques concernant les voitures moderne, les voitures anciennes, les véhicules commerciaux, les camions et les véhicules agricoles.
    [Show full text]
  • Mrfiat.Com Catalog
    September 2021 Other Fiats Parts Table of Contents Fiat->Other Fiats->Abarth 2 Fiat->Other Fiats->Accessories 3 Fiat->Other Fiats->Body Panels 7 Fiat->Other Fiats->Brakes 9 Fiat->Other Fiats->Cables 14 Fiat->Other Fiats->Doors 15 Fiat->Other Fiats->Electrical and Ignition 16 Fiat->Other Fiats->Emblems 19 Fiat->Other Fiats->Engine 21 Fiat->Other Fiats->Exhaust 33 Fiat->Other Fiats->Glass and Seals 34 Fiat->Other Fiats->Interior 35 Fiat->Other Fiats->Lights 37 Fiat->Other Fiats->Luggage Compartment 40 Fiat->Other Fiats->Rims 41 Fiat->Other Fiats->Steering 43 Fiat->Other Fiats->Steering Wheels 46 Fiat->Other Fiats->Transmission 47 Terms and Conditions 53 Page 1 mrfiat.com 1-877-9MRFIAT (1-877-967-3428) Other Fiats->Abarth 500 Abarth A112 Abarth Autobianchi A112 Fiberglass... Carburetor Cover Abarth Oil... AB-500-087 AB-OTH-001 AB-OTH-003 Fiberglass instrument cluster for Carburetor cover for A112 Oil pan for Fiat A112 Abarth Fiat 500 Abarth models. Part: Abarth models. models. AB-500-087 Autobianchi Abarth Abarth Elaborazione Abarth 1300 2000 Bonnet Plate... Script... Front Brake... AE-500-098 AE-OTH-001 BR-1500-009 Plastic black bonnet plate Premium quality Abarth Brake caliper gasket kit for 130x35 mm for Autobianchi elaborazione script chrome Abarth 1300 and 2000 models. Abarth models. emblem 125 mm for Fiat Abarth Fiat part # 901005 - SP2526. models. For... Abarth Round Abarth Side Crest Abarth Rear Crest Emblem Emblem Emblem EB-OTH-021-1 EB-OTH-027-1 EB-OTH-028-1 Round emblem for Fiat Abarth Dide crest emblem for Fiat Rear crest emblem for Fiat models.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosch Fuel Filters Application Guide
    Bosch Fuel Filters Application Guide Robert Bosch LLC 2800 South 25th Avenue Broadview, IL 60155 Phone 708-865-5200 www.boschautoparts.com 17102431 ©2017 Robert Bosch LLC, USA. All rights reserved. BOSCH is a registered trademark of Robert Bosch GmbH and/or its affiliated entities. Bosch Fuel Filters help to protect the most expensive parts of the engine by filtering out foreign particles. Even the smallest particles can cause considerable wear and tear to an engine. Protecting the fuel system helps to prolong the life of your vehicle. A Bosch Fuel Filter is one of the best ways to ensure dependable and trouble-free performance. Marketing No. Bosch No. Part Description Brief Application 77000WS F00E164427 Gasoline Fuel Filter 1999-2007 Nissan Urvan 77001WS F00E164428 Gasoline Fuel Filter 1976-1982 Cadillac DeVille, Eldorado, Fleetwood, Seville 77002WS F00E164429 Gasoline Fuel Filter 1975-1983 Ford Bronco, E-Series Van, F-Series Pickup, Thunderbird; 1983-1975 Mercury Capri, Cougar, Grand Marquis, Zephyr 77004WS F00E164431 Gasoline Fuel Filter 1988-1993 Dodge B-Series Van, D/W Pickup, Dakota, RamCharger 77006WS F00E164433 Gasoline Fuel Filter 1990 Dodge Monaco; 1988-1990 Eagle Premier; 1993-1997 Jeep Grand Cherokee, Grand Wagoneer 77007WS F00E164434 Gasoline Fuel Filter 1991-1996 Dodge Dakota, RamCharger 77008WS F00E164435 Gasoline Fuel Filter 1992-2001 Dodge B-Series Van, RamVan, Viper 77009WS F00E164436 Gasoline Fuel Filter 1990-2005 Audi S4, S6, A8, S4; 1980-1984 Saab 900; 2000-2005 VW Passat, 1980 Volvo 242 77010WS F00E164437 Gasoline
    [Show full text]
  • UNIGOM Descrizione Prz Listino Conf EAN UNIGOM Um 070370ST
    UNIGOM Descrizione Prz_Listino Conf EAN_UNIGOM Um 1060 MAN.SUP.RAD.LANCIA Y 1242cc SPI 8,03 1 8050144000116 PZ 1061 MAN.INF.RAD.LANCIA Y 1108/1242 SPI 3 vie 34,90 1 8050144000123 PZ 1062 MAN.SUP.RAD.LANCIA Y 1370 SPI 1^ S. 9,90 1 8050144000130 PZ 1063 MAN.SUP.RAD.LANCIA Y 1370 SPI 2^ S. 8,76 1 8050144000147 PZ 1064 MAN.SUP.RAD.LANCIA Y 1370 SPI 12V 75/80cv 7,90 1 8050144000154 PZ 1065 MAN.INF.RAD.LANCIA Y 1370 SPI 12V 75/80cv 7,77 1 8050144000161 PZ 1070 MAN.RISCALD. Y 1242SPI 16V Con spurgo 11,97 1 8050144000178 PZ 1280 MAN. SUP. RAD. 128 6,82 1 8050144000291 PZ 1282 MAN. POMP. TERMOS. 128 RITMO 4,20 1 8050144000307 PZ 1290 MAN. SUP. RAD. 127 900 6,95 1 8050144000338 PZ 1291 MAN. INF. RAD. 127 900 5,30 1 8050144000345 PZ 1298 MAN. INF. RAD. 128 7,50 1 8050144000376 PZ 1360 MAN. SUP. RAD. 131 1300 5,13 1 8050144000451 PZ 1361 MAN. SUP. RAD. 131 1300 CL 5,35 1 8050144000468 PZ 1367 MAN. SUP. RAD. 131 SM 5,04 1 8050144000475 PZ 1375 MAN. SUP. RAD. RITMO 60-65-75-85 5,56 1 8050144000482 PZ 1390 MAN. SUP. RAD. PANDA 45 7,03 1 8050144000536 PZ 1391 MAN. INF. RAD. PANDA 45 6,51 1 8050144000543 PZ 1397 MAN. SUP. RAD. PANDA 45 II S. 6,72 1 8050144000574 PZ 1470 MAN. SUP. RAD. A 112 9,44 1 8050144000635 PZ 1471 MAN. INF.
    [Show full text]
  • Fact Book 2016
    SUBARU CORPORATION Fact Book 2016 Corporate Communications Dept. SUBARU Fact book 2016 54 Corporate Information Contents ※Click title to jump to the details. Corporate Information 1 Profile 3 Aerospace Company 2 Mid-term Management Vision 4 1 Aircraft Production 31 3 Board Directors / Executive Officers 7 4 Organization 9 5 Domestic facilities 10 Industrial Products Company 6 Main Affiliates (Japan) 11 ※The Industrial Products Company will be integrated with the Subaru Automotive Business with effect from October 1, 2016. 7 Main Affiliates (Overseas) 12 1 Sales of General-Purpose Engines 32 8 Employees 13 2 Production of General-Purpose Engines 9 Facilities 14 (including on-board use) 32 3 Product Lineup 33 4 Specified dealers of Subaru products 33 Business Results 1 Consolidated Sales and Profits 15 2 Non-Consolidated Sales and Profits 16 Eco Technologies Company 34 3 Capital Expenditures, Depreciation and ※Eco Technology Company was discontinued in March R&D Expenses 16 2013. Share Information History 1 Share Information 17 1 Pre-Fuji Heavy Industries 35 2 Fuji Heavy Industries 36 NOTES: Automotive Business *The fiscal years stated in the Fact Book begin on April 1 of the previous year and end on March 31 of the year 1 Production 18 indicated. 2 Sales 20 3 Export 21 4 Brand Statement and Core Technologies 22 5 Product Lineup 25 6 Domestic sales agents 29 7 Overseas market overview 30 SUBARU Fact book 2016 2 Corporate Information 1 Profile Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd.(FHI) Name *FHI will change its company name to “SUBARU CORPORATION” with effect from April 1, 2017.
    [Show full text]