Conditional Deletion of LRP1 Leads to Progressive Loss of Recombined NG2-Expressing Oligodendrocyte Precursor Cells in a Novel Mouse Model
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Imm Catalog.Pdf
$ Gene Symbol A B 3 C 4 D 9 E 10 F 11 G 12 H 13 I 14 J. K 17 L 18 M 19 N 20 O. P 22 R 26 S 27 T 30 U 32 V. W. X. Y. Z 33 A ® ® Gene Symbol Gene ID Antibody Monoclonal Antibody Polyclonal MaxPab Full-length Protein Partial-length Protein Antibody Pair KIt siRNA/Chimera Gene Symbol Gene ID Antibody Monoclonal Antibody Polyclonal MaxPab Full-length Protein Partial-length Protein Antibody Pair KIt siRNA/Chimera A1CF 29974 ● ● ADAMTS13 11093 ● ● ● ● ● A2M 2 ● ● ● ● ● ● ADAMTS20 80070 ● AACS 65985 ● ● ● ADAMTS5 11096 ● ● ● AANAT 15 ● ● ADAMTS8 11095 ● ● ● ● AATF 26574 ● ● ● ● ● ADAMTSL2 9719 ● AATK 9625 ● ● ● ● ADAMTSL4 54507 ● ● ABCA1 19 ● ● ● ● ● ADAR 103 ● ● ABCA5 23461 ● ● ADARB1 104 ● ● ● ● ABCA7 10347 ● ADARB2 105 ● ABCB9 23457 ● ● ● ● ● ADAT1 23536 ● ● ABCC4 10257 ● ● ● ● ADAT2 134637 ● ● ABCC5 10057 ● ● ● ● ● ADAT3 113179 ● ● ● ABCC8 6833 ● ● ● ● ADCY10 55811 ● ● ABCD2 225 ● ADD1 118 ● ● ● ● ● ● ABCD4 5826 ● ● ● ADD3 120 ● ● ● ABCG1 9619 ● ● ● ● ● ADH5 128 ● ● ● ● ● ● ABL1 25 ● ● ADIPOQ 9370 ● ● ● ● ● ABL2 27 ● ● ● ● ● ADK 132 ● ● ● ● ● ABO 28 ● ● ADM 133 ● ● ● ABP1 26 ● ● ● ● ● ADNP 23394 ● ● ● ● ABR 29 ● ● ● ● ● ADORA1 134 ● ● ACAA2 10449 ● ● ● ● ADORA2A 135 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ACAN 176 ● ● ● ● ● ● ADORA2B 136 ● ● ACE 1636 ● ● ● ● ADRA1A 148 ● ● ● ● ACE2 59272 ● ● ADRA1B 147 ● ● ACER2 340485 ● ADRA2A 150 ● ● ACHE 43 ● ● ● ● ● ● ADRB1 153 ● ● ACIN1 22985 ● ● ● ADRB2 154 ● ● ● ● ● ACOX1 51 ● ● ● ● ● ADRB3 155 ● ● ● ● ACP5 54 ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ADRBK1 156 ● ● ● ● ACSF2 80221 ● ● ADRM1 11047 ● ● ● ● ACSF3 197322 ● ● AEBP1 165 ● ● ● ● ACSL4 2182 ● -
Datasheet Blank Template
SAN TA C RUZ BI OTEC HNOL OG Y, INC . LRP3 (E-13): sc-109956 BACKGROUND APPLICATIONS Members of the LDL receptor gene family, including LDLR (low density lipo- LRP3 (E-13) is recommended for detection of All LRP3 isoforms 1-3 of mouse, protein receptor), LRP1 (low density lipoprotein related protein), Megalin rat and human origin by Western Blotting (starting dilution 1:200, dilution (also designated GP330), VLDLR (very low density lipoprotein receptor) and range 1:100-1:1000), immunofluorescence (starting dilution 1:50, dilution ApoER2 are characterized by a cluster of cysteine-rich class A repeats, epi - range 1:50-1:500) and solid phase ELISA (starting dilution 1:30, dilution dermal growth factor (EGF)-like repeats, YWTD repeats and an O-linked sugar range 1:30-1:3000); non cross-reactive with other LRP family members. domain. Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 3 (LRP3) is a 770 LRP3 (E-13) is also recommended for detection of All LRP3 isoforms 1-3 in amino acid protein that contains two CUB domains and four LDL-receptor additional species, including equine, canine, bovine and porcine. class A domains. LRP3 is widely expressed with highest expression in skele - tal muscle and ovary and lowest expression in testis, colon and leukocytes. Suitable for use as control antibody for LRP3 siRNA (h): sc-97441, LRP3 LRP3 is potentially a membrane receptor involved in the internalization of siRNA (m): sc-149048, LRP3 shRNA Plasmid (h): sc-97441-SH, LRP3 shRNA lipophilic molecules and/or signal transduction. Plasmid (m): sc-149048-SH, LRP3 shRNA (h) Lentiviral Particles: sc-97441-V and LRP3 shRNA (m) Lentiviral Particles: sc-149048-V. -
Harnessing Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor Protein 6 (LRP6) Genetic Variation and Wnt Signaling for Innovative Diagnostics in Complex Diseases
OPEN The Pharmacogenomics Journal (2018) 18, 351–358 www.nature.com/tpj REVIEW Harnessing low-density lipoprotein receptor protein 6 (LRP6) genetic variation and Wnt signaling for innovative diagnostics in complex diseases Z-M Wang1,2, J-Q Luo1,2, L-Y Xu3, H-H Zhou1,2 and W Zhang1,2 Wnt signaling regulates a broad variety of processes in both embryonic development and various diseases. Recent studies indicated that some genetic variants in Wnt signaling pathway may serve as predictors of diseases. Low-density lipoprotein receptor protein 6 (LRP6) is a Wnt co-receptor with essential functions in the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, and mutations in LRP6 gene are linked to many complex human diseases, including metabolic syndrome, cancer, Alzheimer’s disease and osteoporosis. Therefore, we focus on the role of LRP6 genetic polymorphisms and Wnt signaling in complex diseases, and the mechanisms from mouse models and cell lines. It is also highly anticipated that LRP6 variants will be applied clinically in the future. The brief review provided here could be a useful resource for future research and may contribute to a more accurate diagnosis in complex diseases. The Pharmacogenomics Journal (2018) 18, 351–358; doi:10.1038/tpj.2017.28; published online 11 July 2017 INTRODUCTION signaling pathways and expressed in various target organs.1 LDLR- The Wnt1 gene was identified in 1982. Ensuing studies in related proteins 5/6 (LRP5/6) belong to this large family and Drosophila and Xenopus unveiled a highly conserved Wnt/ function as co-receptors of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. These β-catenin pathway, namely, canonical Wnt signaling. -
LRP1 Shedding in Human Brain: Roles of ADAM10 and ADAM17 Qiang Liu Washington University School of Medicine in St
Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker ICTS Faculty Publications Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences 2009 LRP1 shedding in human brain: roles of ADAM10 and ADAM17 Qiang Liu Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis Juan Zhang Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis Hien Tran Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis Marcel M. Verbeek Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre Karina Reiss Christian-Albrecht University Kiel See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/icts_facpubs Part of the Medicine and Health Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Liu, Qiang; Zhang, Juan; Tran, Hien; Verbeek, Marcel M.; Reiss, Karina; Estus, Steven; and Bu, Guojun, "LRP1 shedding in human brain: roles of ADAM10 and ADAM17". Molecular Neurodegeneration, 17. 2009. Paper 85. https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/icts_facpubs/85 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences at Digital Commons@Becker. It has been accepted for inclusion in ICTS Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Becker. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Qiang Liu, Juan Zhang, Hien Tran, Marcel M. Verbeek, Karina Reiss, Steven Estus, and Guojun Bu This article is available at Digital Commons@Becker: https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/icts_facpubs/85 Molecular Neurodegeneration BioMed Central Research article Open Access LRP1 shedding -
The LRP6 Rs2302685 Polymorphism Is Associated with Increased Risk Of
Xu et al. Lipids in Health and Disease 2014, 13:94 http://www.lipidworld.com/content/13/1/94 RESEARCH Open Access The LRP6 rs2302685 polymorphism is associated with increased risk of myocardial infarction Shun Xu1,2,3, Jie Cheng1,2,3, Yu-ning Chen1,2,3, Keshen Li4, Ze-wei Ma1,2, Jin-ming Cen5, Xinguang Liu1,2,3, Xi-li Yang5, Can Chen6 and Xing-dong Xiong1,2,3* Abstract Background: Abnormal lipids is one of the critical risk factors for myocardial infarction (MI), however the role of genetic variants in lipid metabolism-related genes on MI pathogenesis still requires further investigation. We herein genotyped three SNPs (LRP6 rs2302685, LDLRAP1 rs6687605, SOAT1 rs13306731) in lipid metabolism-related genes, aimed to shed light on the influence of these SNPs on individual susceptibility to MI. Methods: Genotyping of the three SNPs (rs2302685, rs6687605 and rs13306731) was performed in 285 MI cases and 650 control subjects using polymerase chain reaction–ligation detection reaction (PCR–LDR) method. The association of these SNPs with MI and lipid profiles was performed with SPSS software. Results: Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that C allele (OR = 1.62, P = 0.039) and the combined CT/CC genotype (OR = 1.67, P = 0.035) of LRP6 rs2302685 were associated with increased MI risk, while the other two SNPs had no significant effect. Further stratified analysis uncovered a more evident association with MI risk among younger subjects (≤60 years old). Fascinatingly, CT/CC genotype of rs2302685 conferred increased LDL-C levels compared to TT genotype (3.0 mmol/L vs 2.72 mmol/L) in younger subjects. -
The Intrinsically Disordered Proteins of Myelin in Health and Disease
cells Review Flexible Players within the Sheaths: The Intrinsically Disordered Proteins of Myelin in Health and Disease Arne Raasakka 1 and Petri Kursula 1,2,* 1 Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, NO-5009 Bergen, Norway; [email protected] 2 Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine & Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Aapistie 7A, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 January 2020; Accepted: 16 February 2020; Published: 18 February 2020 Abstract: Myelin ensheathes selected axonal segments within the nervous system, resulting primarily in nerve impulse acceleration, as well as mechanical and trophic support for neurons. In the central and peripheral nervous systems, various proteins that contribute to the formation and stability of myelin are present, which also harbor pathophysiological roles in myelin disease. Many myelin proteins have common attributes, including small size, hydrophobic segments, multifunctionality, longevity, and regions of intrinsic disorder. With recent advances in protein biophysical characterization and bioinformatics, it has become evident that intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs) are abundant in myelin, and their flexible nature enables multifunctionality. Here, we review known myelin IDPs, their conservation, molecular characteristics and functions, and their disease relevance, along with open questions and speculations. We place emphasis on classifying the molecular details of IDPs in myelin, and we correlate these with their various functions, including susceptibility to post-translational modifications, function in protein–protein and protein–membrane interactions, as well as their role as extended entropic chains. We discuss how myelin pathology can relate to IDPs and which molecular factors are potentially involved. Keywords: myelin; intrinsically disordered protein; multiple sclerosis; peripheral neuropathies; myelination; protein folding; protein–membrane interaction; protein–protein interaction 1. -
Management of Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases from Breast Cancer
International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Management of Brain and Leptomeningeal Metastases from Breast Cancer Alessia Pellerino 1,* , Valeria Internò 2 , Francesca Mo 1, Federica Franchino 1, Riccardo Soffietti 1 and Roberta Rudà 1,3 1 Department of Neuro-Oncology, University and City of Health and Science Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy; [email protected] (F.M.); [email protected] (F.F.); riccardo.soffi[email protected] (R.S.); [email protected] (R.R.) 2 Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70121 Bari, Italy; [email protected] 3 Department of Neurology, Castelfranco Veneto and Treviso Hospital, 31100 Treviso, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-011-6334904 Received: 11 September 2020; Accepted: 10 November 2020; Published: 12 November 2020 Abstract: The management of breast cancer (BC) has rapidly evolved in the last 20 years. The improvement of systemic therapy allows a remarkable control of extracranial disease. However, brain (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are frequent complications of advanced BC and represent a challenging issue for clinicians. Some prognostic scales designed for metastatic BC have been employed to select fit patients for adequate therapy and enrollment in clinical trials. Different systemic drugs, such as targeted therapies with either monoclonal antibodies or small tyrosine kinase molecules, or modified chemotherapeutic agents are under investigation. Major aims are to improve the penetration of active drugs through the blood–brain barrier (BBB) or brain–tumor barrier (BTB), and establish the best sequence and timing of radiotherapy and systemic therapy to avoid neurocognitive impairment. Moreover, pharmacologic prevention is a new concept driven by the efficacy of targeted agents on macrometastases from specific molecular subgroups. -
Endothelial LRP1 Transports Amyloid-Β1–42 Across the Blood- Brain Barrier
Endothelial LRP1 transports amyloid-β1–42 across the blood- brain barrier Steffen E. Storck, … , Thomas A. Bayer, Claus U. Pietrzik J Clin Invest. 2016;126(1):123-136. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI81108. Research Article Neuroscience According to the neurovascular hypothesis, impairment of low-density lipoprotein receptor–related protein-1 (LRP1) in brain capillaries of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) contributes to neurotoxic amyloid-β (Aβ) brain accumulation and drives Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology. However, due to conflicting reports on the involvement of LRP1 in Aβ transport and the expression of LRP1 in brain endothelium, the role of LRP1 at the BBB is uncertain. As global Lrp1 deletion in mice is lethal, appropriate models to study the function of LRP1 are lacking. Moreover, the relevance of systemic Aβ clearance to AD pathology remains unclear, as no BBB-specific knockout models have been available. Here, we developed transgenic mouse strains that allow for tamoxifen-inducible deletion of Lrp1 specifically within brain endothelial cells (Slco1c1- CreERT2 Lrp1fl/fl mice) and used these mice to accurately evaluate LRP1-mediated Aβ BBB clearance in vivo. Selective 125 deletion of Lrp1 in the brain endothelium of C57BL/6 mice strongly reduced brain efflux of injected [ I] Aβ1–42. Additionally, in the 5xFAD mouse model of AD, brain endothelial–specific Lrp1 deletion reduced plasma Aβ levels and elevated soluble brain Aβ, leading to aggravated spatial learning and memory deficits, thus emphasizing the importance of systemic Aβ elimination via the BBB. Together, our results suggest that receptor-mediated Aβ BBB clearance may be a potential target for treatment and prevention of Aβ brain accumulation in AD. -
How Does Protein Zero Assemble Compact Myelin?
Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 13 May 2020 doi:10.20944/preprints202005.0222.v1 Peer-reviewed version available at Cells 2020, 9, 1832; doi:10.3390/cells9081832 Perspective How Does Protein Zero Assemble Compact Myelin? Arne Raasakka 1,* and Petri Kursula 1,2 1 Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Jonas Lies vei 91, NO-5009 Bergen, Norway 2 Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine & Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, Aapistie 7A, FI-90220 Oulu, Finland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Myelin protein zero (P0), a type I transmembrane protein, is the most abundant protein in peripheral nervous system (PNS) myelin – the lipid-rich, periodic structure that concentrically encloses long axonal segments. Schwann cells, the myelinating glia of the PNS, express P0 throughout their development until the formation of mature myelin. In the intramyelinic compartment, the immunoglobulin-like domain of P0 bridges apposing membranes together via homophilic adhesion, forming a dense, macroscopic ultrastructure known as the intraperiod line. The C-terminal tail of P0 adheres apposing membranes together in the narrow cytoplasmic compartment of compact myelin, much like myelin basic protein (MBP). In mouse models, the absence of P0, unlike that of MBP or P2, severely disturbs the formation of myelin. Therefore, P0 is the executive molecule of PNS myelin maturation. How and when is P0 trafficked and modified to enable myelin compaction, and how disease mutations that give rise to incurable peripheral neuropathies alter the function of P0, are currently open questions. The potential mechanisms of P0 function in myelination are discussed, providing a foundation for the understanding of mature myelin development and how it derails in peripheral neuropathies. -
Over-Expression of Low-Density Lipoprotein Receptor-Related Protein-1 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis and Invasion in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
Pancreatology 19 (2019) 429e435 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Pancreatology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pan Over-expression of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related Protein-1 is associated with poor prognosis and invasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Ali Gheysarzadeh a, Amir Ansari a, Mohammad Hassan Emami b, * Amirnader Emami Razavi c, Mohammad Reza Mofid a, a Department of Clinical Biochemistry, School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran b Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Diseases Research Center, Poursina Hakim Research Institute for Health Care Development, Isfahan, Iran c Iran National Tumor Bank, Cancer Biology Research Center, Cancer Institute of Iran, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran article info abstract Article history: Background: Low-density lipoprotein receptor-Related Protein-1 (LRP-1) has been reported to involve in Received 1 December 2018 tumor development. However, its role in pancreatic cancer has not been elucidated. The present study Received in revised form was designed to evaluate the expression of LRP-1 in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Cancer (PDAC) as 16 February 2019 well as its association with prognosis. Accepted 23 February 2019 Methods: Here, 478 pancreatic cancers were screened for suitable primary PDAC tumors. The samples Available online 14 March 2019 were analyzed using qRT-PCR, western blotting, and Immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining as well as LRP-1 expression in association with clinicopathological features. Keywords: PDAC Results: The relative LRP-1 mRNA expression was up-regulated in 82.3% (42/51) of the PDAC tumors and ± fi ± LRP-1 its expression (3.72 1.25) was signi cantly higher than that in pancreatic normal margins (1.0 0.23, Prognosis P < 0.05). -
Astrocytic LRP1 Mediates Brain Aßclearance and Impacts Amyloid
The Journal of Neuroscience, April 12, 2017 • 37(15):4023–4031 • 4023 Neurobiology of Disease Astrocytic LRP1 Mediates Brain A Clearance and Impacts Amyloid Deposition Chia-Chen Liu,1 Jin Hu,1,3 Na Zhao,1 XJian Wang,1 Na Wang,1,3 XJohn R. Cirrito,2 Takahisa Kanekiyo,1 David M. Holtzman,2 and Guojun Bu1,3 1Department of Neuroscience, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida 32224, 2Department of Neurology, Hope Center for Neurological Disorders, Knight Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, and 3Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Disease and Aging Research, Institute of Neuroscience, College of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, 361102 China Accumulation and deposition of amyloid- (A) in the brain represent an early and perhaps necessary step in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). A accumulation leads to the formation of A aggregates, which may directly and indirectly lead to eventual neurodegeneration. While A production is accelerated in many familial forms of early-onset AD, increasing evidence indicates that impaired clearance of A is more evident in late-onset AD. To uncover the mechanisms underlying impaired A clearance in AD, we examined the role of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 1 (LRP1) in astrocytes. Although LRP1 has been shown to play critical roles in brain A metabolism in neurons and vascular mural cells, its role in astrocytes, the most abundant cell type in the brain responsible for maintaining neuronal homeostasis, remains unclear. Here, we show that astrocytic LRP1 plays a critical role in brain A clearance. LRP1 knockdown in primary astrocytes resulted in decreased cellular A uptake and degradation. -
Lrp1 Modulators
Last updated on February 14, 2021 Cognitive Vitality Reports® are reports written by neuroscientists at the Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation (ADDF). These scientific reports include analysis of drugs, drugs-in- development, drug targets, supplements, nutraceuticals, food/drink, non-pharmacologic interventions, and risk factors. Neuroscientists evaluate the potential benefit (or harm) for brain health, as well as for age-related health concerns that can affect brain health (e.g., cardiovascular diseases, cancers, diabetes/metabolic syndrome). In addition, these reports include evaluation of safety data, from clinical trials if available, and from preclinical models. Lrp1 Modulators Evidence Summary Lrp1 has a variety of essential functions, mediated by a diverse array of ligands. Therapeutics will need to target specific interactions. Neuroprotective Benefit: Lrp1-mediated interactions promote Aβ clearance, Aβ generation, tau propagation, brain glucose utilization, and brain lipid homeostasis. The therapeutic effect will depend on the interaction targeted. Aging and related health concerns: Lrp1 plays mixed roles in cardiovascular diseases and cancer, dependent on context. Lrp1 is dysregulated in metabolic disease, which may contribute to insulin resistance. Safety: Broad-spectrum Lrp1 modulators are untenable therapeutics due to the high potential for extensive side effects. Therapies that target a specific Lrp1-ligand interaction are expected to have a better therapeutic profile. 1 Last updated on February 14, 2021 Availability: Research use Dose: N/A Chemical formula: N/A S16 is in clinical trials MW: N/A Half life: N/A BBB: Angiopep is a peptide that facilitates BBB penetrance by interacting with Lrp1 Clinical trials: S16, an Lrp1 Observational studies: sLrp1 levels are agonist was tested in healthy altered in Alzheimer’s disease, volunteers (n=10) in a Phase 1 cardiovascular disease, and metabolic study.