The Coyote Hills – a Relic of the Age of Dinosaurs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Coyote Hills – a Relic of the Age of Dinosaurs AUTUMN 2016 Volume 39, Number 3 The Coyote Hills – A Relic of the Age of Dinosaurs By Bruce Rogers, sediment covering of the older ocean floor US Geological Survey (retired) called the Farallon Plate, was scraped off as The Coyote Hills are located at the it was subducted (pushed under) the ad- eastern end of the Dumbarton Bridge in vancing North American Plate, then heated, the City of Fremont in southern Alameda squeezed, and generally mistreated. County. The bulk of the hills are north of Rather quickly, geologically speak- ing, some of these rocks that made up the Highway 84, where a regional park is named Farallon Plate top-most layer, were thrust after the hills. The smallest of the hills, under the North American Plate, and then located south of Highway 84, is where the pushed back up to the surface. Further plate San Francisco Bay National Wildlife Refuge tectonic movements cracked, bent, and Headquarters resides. moved these large blocks of rock around the They form an irregular, linear ridge western edge of North America. Some were roughly parallel to the western Coast Ranges smashed against the then coast where they and eastern Diablo Range. Surrounded by were welded into place about 70 million a piedmont of grassy fields to the east and years ago. mixed marshland and salt evaporator ponds Along the joint between these two to the west, they look strangely out of place. plates, exotic rocks formed nearly 10 miles No other natural hills in the east bay exist beneath the ocean were then “squeezed” in such close proximity to the San Francisco up along the deeply reaching boundary Bay. Their rugged red, brown, and greenish faults and intruded into the already highly Figure 1. Radiolarian Chert by the Harrier rocks also look unlike most of the rocks mish-mash of assorted rocks at coast side. Spur Trail at Don Edwards Refuge. forming the surrounding hills and moun- Subsequently, more tectonic movements Photo: Jose Garcia tains. These seemingly out of place and pushed up the Coast Ranges, similar to exotic rocks comprising the Coyote Hills, pushing up folds in a rug. These rocks have its convoluted migration to Coyote Hills, it however, offer a glimpse into the far distant fascinated geologist for nearly 150 years. was metamorphosed, squeezed, heated, and past of Central California. First mapped in San Francisco in the late subjected to alkali fluids nearly 500 degrees To start, we must travel back to the 1800s, they were named the Franciscan Fahrenheit in temperature. Once welded to dawn of the Age of Dinosaurs, nearly 200 Assemblage or Group after the San the coast, this pervasively fractured rock was million years ago. The Fremont and Newark Francisco-founding Franciscans. deeply weathered to an ocherous brownish- area was then covered by the proto-Pacific Before we go further into how the yellow color. Thin veins of milky quartz Ocean. Underwater volcanoes poured black Coyote Hills became a “high tide” island and white calcite deposited from hot water basalt lava out onto the ocean bed floor (one surrounded by sea water only at high solutions encountered during its wild ride while masses of silica ooze slowly, accumu- tide), we should take a quick look at the commonly pattern these rocks. lating in the adjacent, deeper ocean basins. rocks themselves. The most common rock Nearly as plentiful as the greenstone, All these rocks were originally deposited in exposed in the hills is a dark greenish-black bright reddish-orange chert (Figure 1) tropical waters just north of the equator and colored rock called greenstone. makes up most of the higher hills and pin- perhaps several thousand miles southwest of Greenstone, denoted as “gs” on the geo- nacled outcrops of the Coyote Hills. Chert their present location. logic map (Figure 2), is basalt lava, common started its life as silica accumulating on the A great deal of time passed as the in such places as Hawaii. Originally poured floors of deep ocean basins. Literally billions North American Plate pushed its way west, out onto the ocean floor as pillow-shaped overriding the older ocean floor. The thin blobs (amazingly called pillow basalt) during continued next page from page 1 of tiny silica-shelled animals called radiolar- ians lived, died, and sank to form a jelly-like ooze. Compressed for millennia, this ooze slowly turned into hard, brittle chert. Traces of iron and manganese give the chert its red, yellow, orange, blackish-blue, and green coloration. In many places, thin beds of manganese oxides remain between the chert layers as thin, glossy bluish-black coatings. Less common is feldspar-rich sand- stone called graywacke. In the Franciscan Assemblage, graywacke usually forms the bulk of the rocks, but here it is far less common. Most of these rocks are deeply weathered. One can also see graywacke by digging nearly 30 feet down to fresh rock where the original light gray color can be seen. Very minor amounts of highly meta- morphosed limestone, denoted as “Is” on the geologic map, deposited on the original offshore island chain have been found in the hills. The scraps of this white to rose-colored rock only occur in a few places in the Coyote Hills including the northwestern end and center of the range in Coyote Hills Regional Park. Limestone often contains tiny fossils used to date the rocks and to figure out their origin. This limestone, in contrast to the more common reef deposits, was formed atop of submerged mountains called seamounts. Hot water Figure 2. Geologic map of the coyote hills. from the cooling basalt precipitated lime This package of former deep sea rocks of magnesium-rich solutions, sprinkling from the seawater to form the limestone. are now considered one of 11 series of “ter- thumb-sized bobbles of the orange to Relatively pure limestone is colored creamy ranes” or groups of similar rock groups in tan-colored mineral magnesite into the white while those colored in various shades the San Francisco Bay Area and surrounding serpentine. of red and pink have more iron impurities Central California geographic area. The Once the Coyote Hills attained their within it. greenstone-chert-graywacke combination of final resting place, the forces of water and Let us return to the days of yesteryear old ocean bottom rocks, is called the Marin wind began their patient work of reducing and see just what became of the hodgepodge Headlands terrane and extends from Coyote them to low slopes adjacent to the San of rocks of slightly differing age and mode Hills north under San Francisco Bay, up Francisco Bay. This, however, would take of origin. About 24 million years ago, through central San Francisco, and on into some time. the east-over-west motion of the North the Marin Headlands where it was first San Francisco Bay formed from a grassy American Plate slightly diverged and a large mapped by geologists nearly 120 years ago. valley about 12,000 years ago as slowly splinter of the coastal apron (rock) was split Sometime during all this shuffling of rising seawater from the melting of glaciers off. The resulting fracture separating this large plates of rock, deep crust rocks made covered the aprons surrounding the hill. large block from the rest of North America of dark green minerals were slowly extruded Saltwater marshes formed along the edges is now called the San Andreas fault system upwards along the nearly vertical faults as a of the hills and extended outward nearly a (Figure 3). The Hayward and Calaveras plastic sheet. Partly metamorphosed by hot mile into the bay. Slowly the adjacent slopes faults are part of this system. A host of water solutions in the crust during their epic of the Diablo Range were eroded down to small, shorter faults are also present, one journey, the rocks were changed into bluish- provide great quantities of sandy and silty being the Silver Creek fault that extends green serpentine, California’s State Rock. sediment that Alameda Creek spread to from the northeastern San Jose area north This mass was intruded into the Marin nearly engulf the eastern shore of the Coyote towards Hayward. This fault actually Headlands terrane, as well as others, along Hills. As a result, the hills were formerly marks the eastern edge of the Coyote Hills. the major faults separating the terranes “high tide” islands, having a seawater moat Because these hills that are so distinct from from each other. Indeed, wherever you find during high tides. the surrounding rocks and structure, it is serpentine, you are looking at a profoundly The first peoples to occupy the area postulated that a similar fault marks the deep fault millions of years old. Waning arrived about 10,000 years ago and, finding western edge of the hills. heated water solutions added a final pulse the climate and plentiful resources to their Page 2 liking, began to exploit these resources. Chert was used to make tools and weapons. Grinding pits for processing nuts and seeds were worn into both chert boulders and greenstone outcrops. Modern settlers followed their prede- cessors and diked off marshlands to form salt evaporation ponds, creating the largest natural salt distillery in North America. In adjacent, drained marshes to the east of Coyote Hills, cattle ranches and dairy and vegetable farms thrived during the 1800s and early 1900s before everyone found the delightful climate of the Bay Area and moved in. Modern developers, too, found the flanks of the Coyote Hills attractive and opened up several quarries to mine crushed rock aggregate for concrete. Indeed, the former Dumbarton Quarry once extended nearly 120 feet below sea level in its final Figure 3.
Recommended publications
  • Petition to List Mountain Lion As Threatened Or Endangered Species
    BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME COMMISSION A Petition to List the Southern California/Central Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) of Mountain Lions as Threatened under the California Endangered Species Act (CESA) A Mountain Lion in the Verdugo Mountains with Glendale and Los Angeles in the background. Photo: NPS Center for Biological Diversity and the Mountain Lion Foundation June 25, 2019 Notice of Petition For action pursuant to Section 670.1, Title 14, California Code of Regulations (CCR) and Division 3, Chapter 1.5, Article 2 of the California Fish and Game Code (Sections 2070 et seq.) relating to listing and delisting endangered and threatened species of plants and animals. I. SPECIES BEING PETITIONED: Species Name: Mountain Lion (Puma concolor). Southern California/Central Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) II. RECOMMENDED ACTION: Listing as Threatened or Endangered The Center for Biological Diversity and the Mountain Lion Foundation submit this petition to list mountain lions (Puma concolor) in Southern and Central California as Threatened or Endangered pursuant to the California Endangered Species Act (California Fish and Game Code §§ 2050 et seq., “CESA”). This petition demonstrates that Southern and Central California mountain lions are eligible for and warrant listing under CESA based on the factors specified in the statute and implementing regulations. Specifically, petitioners request listing as Threatened an Evolutionarily Significant Unit (ESU) comprised of the following recognized mountain lion subpopulations:
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Project Description March 5, 2003 Page 3-1
    Marina Shores Village Project Draft EIR City of Redwood City 3. Project Description March 5, 2003 Page 3-1 3. PROJECT DESCRIPTION This chapter describes the proposed action or "project" addressed by this EIR. The description is based on information provided to the City by the project applicant, Glenborough-Pauls LLC. As stipulated by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, the project description has been detailed to the extent needed for adequate review and evaluation of environmental impacts. In addition to describing key elements of the proposed project, this chapter is supplemented by project description details in individual environmental chapters 4 through 15. The description that follows includes (a) the project setting (location, boundaries, and local setting of the project site); (b) the project background (site history); (c) a statement of the basic project objectives sought by the applicant; (d) the project's physical and operational characteristics (i.e., land use components, densities, building types, architectural design, landscaping/open space, circulation and parking plans, marina and shoreline modifications, infrastructure provisions, project management, and other pertinent features); (e) the anticipated project construction schedule; and (f) the various anticipated permits and jurisdictional approvals required to allow construction of the project. 3.1 PROJECT SETTING 3.1.1 Regional Location As illustrated on Figure 3.1 (Regional Map), the proposed project site is located at the northern edge of the developed portion of Redwood City, on the San Francisco Bay side of U.S. Highway 101 (Bayshore Freeway). U.S. 101 provides regional access to the approximately 46.45-acre project site; East Bayshore Road and Bair Island Road provide local access.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 3.4 Biological Resources 3.4- Biological Resources
    SECTION 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4- BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES This section discusses the existing sensitive biological resources of the San Francisco Bay Estuary (the Estuary) that could be affected by project-related construction and locally increased levels of boating use, identifies potential impacts to those resources, and recommends mitigation strategies to reduce or eliminate those impacts. The Initial Study for this project identified potentially significant impacts on shorebirds and rafting waterbirds, marine mammals (harbor seals), and wetlands habitats and species. The potential for spread of invasive species also was identified as a possible impact. 3.4.1 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES SETTING HABITATS WITHIN AND AROUND SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY The vegetation and wildlife of bayland environments varies among geographic subregions in the bay (Figure 3.4-1), and also with the predominant land uses: urban (commercial, residential, industrial/port), urban/wildland interface, rural, and agricultural. For the purposes of discussion of biological resources, the Estuary is divided into Suisun Bay, San Pablo Bay, Central San Francisco Bay, and South San Francisco Bay (See Figure 3.4-2). The general landscape structure of the Estuary’s vegetation and habitats within the geographic scope of the WT is described below. URBAN SHORELINES Urban shorelines in the San Francisco Estuary are generally formed by artificial fill and structures armored with revetments, seawalls, rip-rap, pilings, and other structures. Waterways and embayments adjacent to urban shores are often dredged. With some important exceptions, tidal wetland vegetation and habitats adjacent to urban shores are often formed on steep slopes, and are relatively recently formed (historic infilled sediment) in narrow strips.
    [Show full text]
  • Marin Headlands Golden Gate National Recreation Area
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Marin Headlands Golden Gate National Recreation Area Directions to the Marin Headlands From North: Take Hwy 101 south and take Exit 442: “Alexander Ave Exit,” just before Golden Gate Bridge. Turn left at stop, then immediate right up hill on Conzelman Road. Follow signs to Marin Headlands destinations. From South: Take Hwy 101 north across Golden Gate Bridge. Exit at Alexander Avenue (second exit after crossing bridge; first exit is Vista Point). Stay right on exit ramp and merge onto Alexander Avenue for 0.2 miles. Take first left onto Danes Road (unmarked). Go through tunnel and follow signs to Marin Headlands destinations. In case of emergency dial (415) 561-5656 or 911 For General Information call (415) 331-1540 For your safety in case of emergency, Camping is by permit only. To reserve a please be prepared to tell the space at Kirby Cove or Bicentennial, call dispatcher your location in the park. (877)444-6777; for all other sites call National Parks are protected areas. Take the Marin Headlands Visitor Center at only pictures, leave only footprints. (415)331-1540. A camping brochure is Shortcuts cause erosion. Please stay on available at the visitor center and online. designated trails. San Francisco MUNI Line 76x Marin If you encounter coyotes, keep your Headlands Express serves major sites in the distance, keep pets and children Marin Headlands on Saturdays, Sundays, supervised, and do not feed coyotes or and most holidays. Contact MUNI for any other wildlife. schedule at: (415) 673-6864 or www.sfmta.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Angel Island to Island Angel on Reynolds Camp Established
    9/27/05, 4:29 PM 4:29 9/27/05, 1 layout2005 AIbrochurePDF Printed on Recycled Paper Recycled on Printed ) /0 . (Rev Parks State California 2003 © 7 1 (415) 435-1915 (415) Tiburon, CA 94920 CA Tiburon, P.O. Box 318 Box P.O. Angel Island State Park State Island Angel www.parks.ca.gov 711, TTY relay service relay TTY 711, (916) 653-6995, outside the U.S. the outside 653-6995, (916) For information call: (800) 777-0369 (800) call: information For Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 CA Sacramento, P. O. Box 942896 Box O. P. Golden Gate Bridge. Gate Golden CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS STATE CALIFORNIA Marin County and the and County Marin Office at the following address. following the at Office views of San Francisco, San of views alternate format, write to the Communications the to write format, alternate number below. To receive this publication in an in publication this receive To below. number sites and breathtaking and sites assistance should contact the park at the phone the at park the contact should assistance arrival, visitors with disabilities who need who disabilities with visitors arrival, access to many historic many to access against individuals with disabilities. Prior to Prior disabilities. with individuals against California State Parks does not discriminate not does Parks State California the land, providing easy providing land, the and roads crisscross roads and station. Today, trails Today, station. and as an immigration an as and for high-quality outdoor recreation. outdoor high-quality for settlement of the West the of settlement cultural
    [Show full text]
  • Late Cenozoic Tectonics of the Central and Southern Coast Ranges of California
    OVERVIEW Late Cenozoic tectonics of the central and southern Coast Ranges of California Benjamin M. Page* Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 George A. Thompson† Department of Geophysics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2215 Robert G. Coleman Department of Geological and Environmental Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2115 ABSTRACT within the Coast Ranges is ascribed in large Taliaferro (e.g., 1943). A prodigious amount of part to the well-established change in plate mo- geologic mapping by T. W. Dibblee, Jr., pre- The central and southern Coast Ranges tions at about 3.5 Ma. sented the areal geology in a form that made gen- of California coincide with the broad Pa- eral interpretations possible. E. H. Bailey, W. P. cific–North American plate boundary. The INTRODUCTION Irwin, D. L. Jones, M. C. Blake, and R. J. ranges formed during the transform regime, McLaughlin of the U.S. Geological Survey and but show little direct mechanical relation to The California Coast Ranges province encom- W. R. Dickinson are among many who have con- strike-slip faulting. After late Miocene defor- passes a system of elongate mountains and inter- tributed enormously to the present understanding mation, two recent generations of range build- vening valleys collectively extending southeast- of the Coast Ranges. Representative references ing occurred: (1) folding and thrusting, begin- ward from the latitude of Cape Mendocino (or by these and many other individuals were cited in ning ca. 3.5 Ma and increasing at 0.4 Ma, and beyond) to the Transverse Ranges. This paper Page (1981).
    [Show full text]
  • The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan
    The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California A Project of California Partners in Flight and PRBO Conservation Science The Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Bird Conservation Plan A Strategy for Protecting and Managing Coastal Scrub and Chaparral Habitats and Associated Birds in California Version 2.0 2004 Conservation Plan Authors Grant Ballard, PRBO Conservation Science Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science Tom Gardali, PRBO Conservation Science Geoffrey R. Geupel, PRBO Conservation Science Tonya Haff, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Museum of Natural History Collections, Environmental Studies Dept., University of CA) Aaron Holmes, PRBO Conservation Science Diana Humple, PRBO Conservation Science John C. Lovio, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, U.S. Navy (Currently at TAIC, San Diego) Mike Lynes, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at Hastings University) Sandy Scoggin, PRBO Conservation Science (Currently at San Francisco Bay Joint Venture) Christopher Solek, Cal Poly Ponoma (Currently at UC Berkeley) Diana Stralberg, PRBO Conservation Science Species Account Authors Completed Accounts Mountain Quail - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Greater Roadrunner - Pete Famolaro, Sweetwater Authority Water District. Coastal Cactus Wren - Laszlo Szijj and Chris Solek, Cal Poly Pomona. Wrentit - Geoff Geupel, Grant Ballard, and Mary K. Chase, PRBO Conservation Science. Gray Vireo - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Black-chinned Sparrow - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Costa's Hummingbird (coastal) - Kirsten Winter, Cleveland National Forest. Sage Sparrow - Barbara A. Carlson, UC-Riverside Reserve System, and Mary K. Chase. California Gnatcatcher - Patrick Mock, URS Consultants (San Diego). Accounts in Progress Rufous-crowned Sparrow - Scott Morrison, The Nature Conservancy (San Diego).
    [Show full text]
  • Fremont Earthquake Exhibit WALKING TOUR of the HAYWARD FAULT (Tule Ponds at Tyson Lagoon to Stivers Lagoon)
    Fremont Earthquake Exhibit WALKING TOUR of the HAYWARD FAULT (Tule Ponds at Tyson Lagoon to Stivers Lagoon) BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Hayward Fault is part of the San Andreas Fault system that dominates the landforms of coastal California. The motion between the North American Plate (southeastern) and the Pacific Plate (northwestern) create stress that releases energy along the San Andreas Fault system. Although the Hayward Fault is not on the boundary of plate motion, the motion is still relative and follows the general relative motion as the San Andreas. The Hayward Fault is 40 miles long and about 8 miles deep and trends along the east side of San Francisco Bay. North to south, it runs from just west of Pinole Point on the south shore of San Pablo Bay and through Berkeley (just under the western rim of the University of California’s football stadium). The Berkeley Hills were probably formed by an upward movement along the fault. In Oakland the Hayward Fault follows Highway 580 and includes Lake Temescal. North of Fremont’s Niles District, the fault runs along the base of the hills that rise abruptly from the valley floor. In Fremont the fault runs within a wide fault zone. Around Tule Ponds at Tyson Lagoon the fault splits into two traces and continues in a downwarped area and turns back into one trace south of Stivers Lagoon. When a fault takes a “side step” it creates pull-apart depressions and compression ridges which can be seen in this area. Southward, the fault lies between the 1 lowest, most westerly ridge of the Diablo Range and the main mountain ridge to the east.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Report Part 1
    Alcatraz Island Golden Gate National Recreation Area Physical History PRE-EUROPEAN (Pre-1776) Before Europeans settled in San Francisco, the area was inhabited by Native American groups including the Miwok, in the area north of San Francisco Bay (today’s Marin County), and the Ohlone, in the area south of San Francisco Bay (today’s San Francisco peninsula). Then, as today, Alcatraz had a harsh environment –strong winds, fog, a lack of a fresh water source (other than rain or fog), rocky terrain –and there was only sparse vegetation, mainly grasses. These conditions were not conducive to living on the island. These groups may have used the island for a fishing station or they may have visited it to gather seabird eggs since the island did provide a suitable habitat for colonies of seabirds. However, the Miwok and Ohlone do not appear to have lived on Alcatraz or to have visibly altered its landscape, and no prehistoric archeological sites have been identified on the island. (Thomson 1979: 2, Delgado et al. 1991: 8, and Hart 1996: 4). SPANISH AND MEXICAN PERIOD (1776-1846) Early Spanish explorers into Alta California encountered the San Francisco Bay and its islands. (Jose Francisco Ortega saw the bay during his scouting for Gaspar de Portola’s 1769 expedition, and Pedro Fages described the three major islands –Angel, Alcatraz, and Yerba Buena –in his journal from the subsequent 1772 expedition.) However, the first Europeans to record their visit to Alcatraz were aboard the Spanish ship San Carlos, commanded by Juan Manuel de Ayala that sailed through the Golden Gate and anchored off Angel Island in August 1775.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Sediment / Unlock Alameda Creek
    PUBLIC SEDIMENT / UNLOCK ALAMEDA CREEK WWW.RESILIENTBAYAREA.ORG ◄ BAYLANDS = LIVING INFRA STR CTY\, E' j(II( ........ • 400 +-' -L C Based on preliminary 0 analysis by SFfl. A more , detailed analysis is beinq E TIDAL MARSH conducted as part of -l/) the Healthy Watersheds l/) ro Resilient Aaylands E project (hwrb.sfei.org) +-' C QJ E "'O MUDFLAT QJ V1 SAC-SJ DELTA 0 1 Sediment supply was estimated by 'Sediment demand was estimated multiplying the current average using a mudflat soil bulK density of annual c;ediment load valuec; from 1.5 q c;ediment/rm c;oil (Brew and McKee et al. (in prep) by the number Williams :?010), a tidal marsh soil of years between 201 r and2100. bulK density ot 0.4 g sed1m ent / cm 3 c;oil (Callaway et al. :?010), and baywide mudflat and marsh area circa 2009 (BAARI vl). BAYLANDS TODAY BAYLANDS 2100 WITH 3' SLR LOW SEDIMENT SUPPLY BAYLANDS 2100 WITH 7' SLR LOW SEDIMENT SUPPLY WE MUST LOOK UPSTREAM TRIBUTARIES FEED THE BAY SONOMA CREEK NAPA RIVER PETALUMA CREEK WALNUT CREEK ALAMEDA CREEK COYOTE CREEK GUADALUPE CREEK ALAMEDA CREEK SEDIMENTSHED ALAMEDA CREEK ALAMEDA CREEK WATERSHED - 660 SQMI OAKLAND ALAMEDA CREEK WATERSHED SAN FRANCISCO SAN JOSE THE CREEK BUILT AN ALLUVIAL FAN AND FED THE BAY ALAMEDA CREEK SOUTH BAY NILES CONE ALLUVIAL FAN HIGH SEDIMENT FEEDS MARSHES TIDAL WETLANDS IT HAS BEEN LOCKED IN PLACE OVER TIME LIVERMORE PLEASANTON SUNOL UNION CITY NILES SAN MATEO BRIDGE EDEN LANDING FREMONT NEWARK LOW SEDIMENT CARGILL SALT PONDS DUMBARTON BRIDGE SEDIMENT FLOWS ARE HIGHLY MODIFIED SEDIMENT IS STUCK IN CHANNEL IMPOUNDED BY DAMS UPSTREAM REDUCED SUPPLY TO THE BAY AND VULNERABILITIES ARE EXACERBATED BY CLIMATE CHANGE EROSION SUBSIDENCE SEA LEVEL RISE THE FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL SAN MATEO BRIDGE UNION CITY NILES RUBBER DAMS BART WEIR EDEN LANDING PONDS HEAD OF TIDE FREMONT 880 NEWARK TIDAL EXTENT FLUVIAL EXTENT DUMBARTON BRIDGE.
    [Show full text]
  • 11. Soils and Geology March 5, 2003 Page 11-1
    Marina Shores Village Project Draft EIR City of Redwood City 11. Soils and Geology March 5, 2003 Page 11-1 11. SOILS AND GEOLOGY This EIR chapter describes existing geologic and soil conditions at the project site and immediate vicinity, identifies associated potential geotechnical impacts related to development of the proposed project, and sets forth measures designed to mitigate identified significant adverse impacts. Data sources used to complete these descriptions include a preliminary geotechnical investigation of the Marina Shores Village project site performed for the applicant by Treadwell & Rollo, Environmental and Geotechnical Consultants, dated June 21, 2001; the assessment of project hydrologic implications completed for this EIR by Clearwater Hydrology (see chapter 9); a wetlands investigation and a biological assessment performed for the applicant by the Huffman-Broadway Group, both dated February 2002; published reference materials produced by the Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS); environmental documents prepared for previous development projects on the site (e.g., the Peninsula Marina and Office Park) and in the immediate vicinity (e.g., the "Villas at Bair Island" and the Bair Island Marina); and the Redwood City Strategic General Plan. The Treadwell & Rollo preliminary geotechnical investigation, much of which is presented in this EIR chapter, describes the limitations and preliminary nature of its conclusions by stating, "The conclusions presented in this report are preliminary and intended to address general geotechnical conditions of the site. The report has not been prepared to meet the need of design professionals, contractors, or any other parties in preparation of final design or construction documents.
    [Show full text]
  • Hayward Regional Shoreline Adaptation Master Plan Appendix a Stakeholder and Public Comments
    SCAPE ARCADIS CONVEY RE:FOCUS SFEI HAYWARD REGIONAL SHORELINE ADAPTATION MASTER PLAN FOR THE HAYWARD AREA SHORELINE PLANNING AGENCY (HASPA) PART OF A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT OF THE CITY OF HAYWARD, HAYWARD AREA RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT, AND EAST BAY REGIONAL PARK DISTRICT HAYWARD REGIONAL SHORELINE MASTER PLAN APPENDIX A STAKEHOLDER AND PUBLIC COMMENTS SUBMITTED 10/02/2020 PUBLIC ONLINE SURVEY 02/27/19 - 03/15/19 ONLINE SURVEY SUMMARY A 23-question survey was conducted on behalf of the Hayward Area Shoreline Planning Agency (HASPA) to assess the public’s general understanding of Hayward Regional Shoreline, mainly in regard to sea level rise, potential flooding, and participants’ feelings, concerns, and predictions regarding these issues. In the spring of 2019, this survey was completed by approximately 900 people throughout the Bay Area, primarily those who live, work, commute through, or recreate at or near the shoreline. 1. Are you familiar with the Hayward Regional Shoreline that is managed by East Bay Regional Park District and Hayward Area Recreation and Park District? The majority of people surveyed are familiar with the Hayward Regional Shoreline. 2. What’s your association with the project area? The majority of those surveyed either drive through the area or enjoy the views of the Shoreline. Approximately two thirds of those surveyed visit the Shoreline and about one third live near the Shoreline. A smaller percentage (about ten percent) specified that they enjoy activities such as birding, cycling, jogging or walking along the Shoreline. A negligible amount of those surveyed stated they’d like to see restaurants built on the area.
    [Show full text]