Media Accountability in a Liberal Democracy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Media Accountability in a Liberal Democracy MEDIA ACCOUNTABILITY IN A LIBERAL DEMOCRACY AN EXAMINATION OF THE HARLOT’S PREROGATIVE Denis Joseph Andrew Muller Submitted in total fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2005 Centre for Public Policy Department of Political Science University of Melbourne Printed on archival quality paper To Catherine, my wife, with love. ABSTRACT This thesis is both a normative and empirical study of media accountability in a liberal democracy. While its focus is predominantly on Australia, it contains some international comparisons. Media ethics and media performance in relation to quality of media content are identified as the two main dimensions of media accountability. They may be conceived of as the means and the ends of media work. The thesis represents the first combined survey of both external mechanisms of accountability in Australia – those existing outside the various media organisations – and the internal mechanisms existing within three of Australia’s largest media organisations. These organisations span print and broadcasting, public and private ownership. The thesis is based on substantial qualitative research involving interviews with a wide range of experts in media ethics, law, management, and accountability. It is also based on two quantitative surveys, one among practitioners of journalism and the other among the public they serve. This combination of research is certainly new in Australia, and no comparable study has been found in other Western countries. In addition to the main qualitative and quantitative surveys, three case studies are presented. One deals with media performance in relation to quality of media content (the case of alleged bias brought against the Australian Broadcasting Corporation by the then Senator Richard Alston); one deals with media ethics (the “cash-for-comment” cases involving various commercial radio broadcasters), and one deals with accountability processes (the “Who Is Right?” experiment at The Sydney Morning Herald). The thesis is grounded in established theories of the media, and these provide the norms on which the media’s performance is judged in relation to quality of media content. Ethical norms are derived from a range of ethical codes and statements of principle developed by the media industry in Australia and in comparable jurisdictions abroad. The thesis points up shortcomings in existing normative media theory and in the codes. It proposes a new theory and institutional structures to make good these deficiencies. ii STATEMENT OF ORIGINAL AUTHORSHIP This is to certify that The thesis consists only of my original work towards the PhD. Due acknowledgement has been made in the text to all other material used. The thesis is less than 100,000 words in length, exclusive of tables, maps, bibliographies and appendices. D. J. A. MULLER iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS For most of my life I have been getting into places through the back door. Having failed matriculation, I got into newspaper journalism through suburban give-aways. When I was 41 I got into university because a paper I had written on freedom-of-information law was accepted as the equivalent of a BA honours thesis. Many people have helped me along the way and their contributions have all added to this thesis. In journalism I found exemplars and guides: men like Alan Dobbyn, David Bowman and Les Wheeler on The Sydney Morning Herald, Creighton Burns on The Age, and Leon Pilpel on The Times, London. I also found supportive colleagues like Michael Smith who, as editor of The Age, not only encouraged me to go to university but arranged for the newspaper to pay my fees. The person who opened the back door of the University of Melbourne for me was Associate Professor Bruce Headey, whom I met on the committee that used to advise The Age and Herald on their public opinion poll, the Saulwick Poll. Bruce supervised my Master’s and was associate supervisor for this thesis. No words will adequately express my gratitude to him. My principal supervisor was Associate Professor David Tucker, and I am greatly indebted to him also for his teaching, guidance and encouragement over many years. I am indebted to the University itself for granting me a scholarship to embark on this work. It was my involvement in the management and reporting of the Saulwick Poll, however, that awakened my interest in social research. Its founder, Irving Saulwick, has really taught me all I know about qualitative and quantitative research. Not only that; he is a great friend and mentor. Many other people helped me directly with this thesis and I am deeply grateful to them all: Glenda Crane and her team at Australian Fieldwork Solutions who carried out the quantitative fieldwork; Gil and Amy at the sandwich shop across the road from the University who helped in the piloting of the voter questionnaire; Matthew Ricketson and his staff at RMIT University who helped distribute my questionnaire among journalism students there; Nigel Henham at The Age, Chris McLeod at the Herald and Weekly Times and Heather Forbes at the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, who made it possible to distribute my questionnaire among their journalists and who helped in many other ways; Margaret Simons, who read the draft and made helpful suggestions, and all the interviewees in various media organisations and elsewhere who gave so generously of their time and their knowledge, and who are individually acknowledged in Appendix A. Finally, my family: my wife Catherine and my children Jacqueline, Elizabeth and Brendan, who put up with days, weeks and eventually months of pre-occupation and lost hours in the study. I can’t imagine how I could have done it without their support. And then my natural mother, Polly Davidson (nee Battey), my discovery of whom when I was 37 gave me the confidence to think that I might, after all, have it in me to complete a university degree. She has not lived to see this, but it is infused with her spirit. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS List of tables and figures vi Introduction 1 Part I: Concepts and grounding 1 History, legitimacy, press theory and functions 8 2 Accountability as a concept 32 Part II: The dimensions of media accountability 3 Ethics 45 4 Performance (Quality of media content) 91 Part III: External accountability mechanisms 5 The Australian Broadcasting Authority 124 6 The Australian Press Council 149 7 The Media, Entertainment & Arts Alliance, and Media Watch 172 Part IV: Internal accountability mechanisms and defamation law 8 The Australian Broadcasting Corporation 190 9 Fairfax and News Ltd 204 10 Defamation 222 Part V: The way ahead 11 Conclusions and recommendations 245 Appendices Bibliography v LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table 1.1: Voters’ Main Source of News Table 2.1 Journalism Professionals’ Statements Identifying Those to Whom the Media Owe Accountability Table 2.2 Journalism Professionals’ Statements Identifying the Values, Behaviours and Effects for Which the Media should be Held Accountable Table 3.1: Journalists’ Attitudes to Certain Ethical Issues Table 3.2: Circumstances in Which Certain Activities are Justified (Journalists) Table 3.3: Journalists’ Perceptions of Journalists as Truth-Tellers Table 3.4: Comparison of Journalists’ Attitudes in Us, Britain, Germany And Australia Table 3.5: Voters’ Perceptions of Journalists Table 3.6: Voters’ Attitudes to Certain Ethical Issues Table 3.7: Circumstances in Which Certain Activities are Justified (Voters) Table 3.8: Voters’ Perceptions of Journalists as Truth-Tellers Table 3.9: Comparison of Journalists’ and Voters’ Attitudes on Certain Ethical Issues Table 3.10: Comparison of Journalists’ and Voters’ Perceptions of Journalists as Truth-Tellers Table 3.11: Proportion of Australian Voters Who Say Journalists Have High or Very High Standards of Ethics or Honesty Table 4.1: Journalists’ Assessment of Journalists’ Performance Table 4.2: Importance U.S. and Australian Journalists Assign to Various Media Roles Table 4.3: Voters’ Assessment of Journalists’ Performance Table 4.4: Comparison of Journalists’ and Voters’ Assessment of Media Performance Table 5.1: Total Complaints against Commercial Broadcasters Investigated by the ABA 2000-2003 Table 5.2: Outcomes of News and Current Affairs Complaints against Commercial Broadcasters 2000-2003 Table 5.3: Outcomes of Complaints against News and Current Affairs Programs by Complaint Type 2000-2003 Table 5.4: Journalists’ Rating of the Australian Broadcasting Authority Table 5.5: Voters’ Awareness of Where to Go to Complain About a Journalist’s Performance (ABA) Table 6.1: Pattern of Complaints Adjudicated by the Australian Press Council 1993- 2002 Table 6.2: Outcomes of Complaints Adjudicated by the Australian Press Council 1993-2000 vi Table 6.3 Satisfaction Levels of Complainants and Respondents about the Australian Press Council’s Complaint Outcomes Table 6.4: Complainants’ Attitudes to the Way The Australian Press Council Conducted its Hearings and Arrived at Outcomes Table 6.5: Journalists’ Rating of The Australian Press Council Table 6.6: Voters’ Awareness of Where to Go to Complain about a Journalist’s Performance (Press Council) Table 7.1: Pattern of Complaints Dealt With by the MEAA Ethics Panel, Victoria, 1993-2002 Table 7.2: Journalists’ Rating of the MEAA Ethics Panel Table 7.3: Voters’ Awareness of Where to Go to Complain about a Journalist’s Performance (MEAA) Table 7.4: Journalists’ Rating of Media Watch Table 7.5: Voters’ Awareness of Where to Go to Complain about a Journalist’s Performance (Media Watch) Table 8.1: Pattern
Recommended publications
  • Liberal Women: a Proud History
    <insert section here> | 1 foreword The Liberal Party of Australia is the party of opportunity and choice for all Australians. From its inception in 1944, the Liberal Party has had a proud LIBERAL history of advancing opportunities for Australian women. It has done so from a strong philosophical tradition of respect for competence and WOMEN contribution, regardless of gender, religion or ethnicity. A PROUD HISTORY OF FIRSTS While other political parties have represented specific interests within the Australian community such as the trade union or environmental movements, the Liberal Party has always proudly demonstrated a broad and inclusive membership that has better understood the aspirations of contents all Australians and not least Australian women. The Liberal Party also has a long history of pre-selecting and Foreword by the Hon Kelly O’Dwyer MP ... 3 supporting women to serve in Parliament. Dame Enid Lyons, the first female member of the House of Representatives, a member of the Liberal Women: A Proud History ... 4 United Australia Party and then the Liberal Party, served Australia with exceptional competence during the Menzies years. She demonstrated The Early Liberal Movement ... 6 the passion, capability and drive that are characteristic of the strong The Liberal Party of Australia: Beginnings to 1996 ... 8 Liberal women who have helped shape our nation. Key Policy Achievements ... 10 As one of the many female Liberal parliamentarians, and one of the A Proud History of Firsts ... 11 thousands of female Liberal Party members across Australia, I am truly proud of our party’s history. I am proud to be a member of a party with a The Howard Years ..
    [Show full text]
  • Print Journalism: a Critical Introduction
    Print Journalism A critical introduction Print Journalism: A critical introduction provides a unique and thorough insight into the skills required to work within the newspaper, magazine and online journalism industries. Among the many highlighted are: sourcing the news interviewing sub-editing feature writing and editing reviewing designing pages pitching features In addition, separate chapters focus on ethics, reporting courts, covering politics and copyright whilst others look at the history of newspapers and magazines, the structure of the UK print industry (including its financial organisation) and the development of journalism education in the UK, helping to place the coverage of skills within a broader, critical context. All contributors are experienced practising journalists as well as journalism educators from a broad range of UK universities. Contributors: Rod Allen, Peter Cole, Martin Conboy, Chris Frost, Tony Harcup, Tim Holmes, Susan Jones, Richard Keeble, Sarah Niblock, Richard Orange, Iain Stevenson, Neil Thurman, Jane Taylor and Sharon Wheeler. Richard Keeble is Professor of Journalism at Lincoln University and former director of undergraduate studies in the Journalism Department at City University, London. He is the author of Ethics for Journalists (2001) and The Newspapers Handbook, now in its fourth edition (2005). Print Journalism A critical introduction Edited by Richard Keeble First published 2005 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX9 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Ave, New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” Selection and editorial matter © 2005 Richard Keeble; individual chapters © 2005 the contributors All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Inaugural Speech of the Honourable David Clarke
    INAUGURAL SPEECH OF THE HONOURABLE DAVID CLARKE The Hon. DAVID CLARKE [8.11 p.m.] (Inaugural speech): I also oppose this legislation. In speaking for the first time I do so with a great and abiding recognition of the responsibilities that my new office places upon me and with the hope that my time spent here will be productive in service to the people of New South Wales. I come to this House as one who by conviction and belief respects, supports and upholds its history and traditions. As a member of the Legislative Council I will resist with all the vigour I can any and all attempts to bring about this House's demise, to weaken its powers or to diminish its stature and traditions in any way. Over the years many outstanding and distinguished members have served in this Chamber. The late Jim Cameron was a member whose values and social beliefs I identify with. He had a unique and inspirational capacity to espouse values in noble and uplifting language as befits such noble values. A former and distinguished President of the House, Johno Johnson, representing an historic political institution of our country, the Australian Labor Party, has also been courageous, forthright and determined, especially in his elevation of the family, his defence of the right to life of the unborn child and his denunciation of abortion. He continues to champion these causes outside this Chamber. I deem it an honour to find myself serving in this House at the same time as Deputy-President Reverend the Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Same-Sex Marriage, Freedom of Speech and Religious Liberty in Australia – a Critical Appraisal
    Solidarity: The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics Volume 7 Issue 1 Religious Liberty Article 4 2017 Same-Sex Marriage, Freedom of Speech and Religious Liberty in Australia – A Critical Appraisal Augusto Zimmermann University of Notre Dame Australia, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/solidarity ISSN: 1839-0366 COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Copyright Regulations 1969 WARNING This material has been copied and communicated to you by or on behalf of the University of Notre Dame Australia pursuant to part VB of the Copyright Act 1969 (the Act). The material in this communication may be subject to copyright under the Act. Any further copying or communication of this material by you may be the subject of copyright protection under the Act. Do not remove this notice. Recommended Citation Zimmermann, Augusto (2017) "Same-Sex Marriage, Freedom of Speech and Religious Liberty in Australia – A Critical Appraisal," Solidarity: The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://researchonline.nd.edu.au/solidarity/vol7/iss1/4 This Article is brought to you by ResearchOnline@ND. It has been accepted for inclusion in Solidarity: The Journal of Catholic Social Thought and Secular Ethics by an authorized administrator of ResearchOnline@ND. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Same-Sex Marriage, Freedom of Speech and Religious Liberty in Australia – A Critical Appraisal Abstract Passing legislation to approve same-sex marriage presents an immediate challenge to free speech and religious liberty. Unfortunately examples from all over the world reveal that legalisation of same-sex marriage may infringe the fundamental rights of the citizen.
    [Show full text]
  • Record of Proceedings
    ISSN 1322-0330 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Hansard Home Page: http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/work-of-assembly/hansard Email: [email protected] Phone (07) 3553 6344 Fax (07) 3553 6369 FIRST SESSION OF THE FIFTY-FIFTH PARLIAMENT Tuesday, 22 August 2017 Subject Page REPORT...............................................................................................................................................................................2231 Information Commissioner ..............................................................................................................................2231 Tabled paper: Office of the Information Commissioner, Queensland: Report to Parliament No. 1 2017-18—Privacy and Mobile Apps ‘How three Queensland government agencies meet their obligations under the Information Privacy Act 2009 (Qld) when developing and operating mobile apps’. ....................................................................................................................2231 SPEAKER’S RULING ..........................................................................................................................................................2231 Answers to Questions on Notice ....................................................................................................................2231 Tabled paper: Letters, dated 14 July 2017 from the member for Mudgeeraba, Ms Ros Bates MP, and 11 July 2017 from the Minister for Communities, Women and Youth, Minister for Child Safety and Minister for the Prevention
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Independent Inquiry Into the Media and Media Regulation Is Protected by Copyright
    REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT INQUIRY INTO THE MEDIA AND MEDIA REGULATION BY THE HON R FINKELSTEIN QC ASSISTED BY PROF M RICKETSON REPORT TO THE MINISTER FOR BROADBAND, COMMUNICATIONS AND THE DIGITAL ECONOMY 28 FEBRUARY 2012 © Commonwealth of Australia 2012 ISBN: 978-0-642-75424-0 (PDF version) 978-0-642-75425-7 (DOC version 978-0-642-75426-4 (printed version) The Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Media and Media Regulation is protected by copyright. With the exception of the Commonwealth Coat of Arms and where otherwise noted, all material included this report is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/). The details of the relevant licence conditions are available on the Creative Commons website, as is the full legal code for CC BY 3.0 AU licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/legalcode). The document must be attributed as the ‘Report of the Independent Inquiry into the Media and Media Regulation’. Using the Commonwealth Coat of Arms The terms of use for the Coat of Arms are available from www.itsanhonour.gov.au Other use The use of any material in this report in a way not permitted or otherwise allowed under the Copyright Act 1968 may be an infringement of copyright. Where you wish to use the material on this in a way that is beyond the scope of the terms of use that apply to it, you must lodge a request for further authorisation with the department. Authorisation Please address requests and enquiries concerning further authorisation to: The Media Inquiry Secretariat Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy PO Box 2154 CANBERRA ACT 2601 [email protected] Letter of transmittal Contents Executive summary—conclusions and recommendations 7 Media codes of ethics and accountability 7 Changing business models and quality journalism 10 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Katina Michael
    Section I. CV ‐ Katina Michael 1. Qualifications & Employment EDUCATION Masters of Transnational Crime Prevention with Distinction Faculty of Law (2007‐2009) University of Wollongong Doctor of Philosophy School of Information Technology & Computer Science (1997‐2003) “Technological Trajectory of the Automatic Identification Industry” University of Wollongong Bachelor of Information Technology with Credit Cooperative Scholarship $30,000 School of Mathematical and Computer Science (1994‐1996) University of Technology Sydney ACADEMIC POSITIONS HELD Professor (August 2018 – to present) School for the Future of Innovation in Society School of Computing, Informatics & Decision Science Engineering Director of the Center for Engineering, Policy & Society Professor (since November 2015 – to present) School of Computing and Information Technology University of Wollongong Associate Dean International (2013‐ 2017) A member of the executive team Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences University of Wollongong Originally hired as a Lecturer (2002‐2005), then promoted to a Senior Lecturer (2006‐2009), and Associate Professor (2010‐2015) Faculty of Informatics University of Wollongong Katina Michael ‐ 1 ACADEMIC POSITIONS CONT. Faculty Fellow (2017 – Present) Centre for Law, Science & Innovation Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law Arizona State University Visiting Academic (2016 – 2017) Web Science Institute (WSI) University of Southampton Visiting Professor (2016‐2017) Foreign Expert Scholarship (Jiangsu Province) Department of Electronic Commerce Nanjing University INDUSTRY POSITIONS HELD Senior Network and Business Planner (1999‐2001) Engineer (1998‐1999), Network and Systems Solutions Graduate Engineer (1996‐1997), Systems Engineering Department Nortel Networks Nortel Networks (previously Nortel/Northern Telecom) was one of the world’s leading telecommunications vendors, specialising in digital switching equipment and later broadband networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Journalism, Media & Communication
    Journalism, Media & Communication 2006/07 Textbooks www.oup.com.au 2 Highlights PAGE 3 PAGE 4 PAGE 8 Publisher’s Message Are you interested in writing a textbook? Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford University Press Australia and New Zealand is committed to publishing high quality textbooks to meet the needs of Australian and New Zealand students. We aim to deliver to our authors the benefi ts that come from publishing with a focused and dedicated Higher Education team, operating as part of a large and international publisher. If you have an idea for a new textbook, we would be pleased to talk with you about it. Lucy McLoughlin Publishing Editor, Higher Education Email: [email protected] Look out for our locally published titles marked with this icon 13 Digit ISBN From January 2007, the ISBN will be expanded from a 10-digit (ISBN-10) to a 13-digit number (ISBN-13), which will bring it in line with the 13-digit European Article Number (EAN) used throughout the world to identify products in other retail and wholesale channels. This is happening because there is a shortage of ISBNs in some countries. For much of 2006 catalogues, order forms, and the OUP web site will display both ISBNs. Increasingly during the fi nal quarter of 2006, and certainly from 1 January 2007 only ISBN-13 will be displayed. OUP will continue to accept orders for titles that have an ISBN-10 after 1 January 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Samuel Griffith Society Proceedings Vol 11
    What a nice Referendum – Pity about the Debate Sir David Smith, KCVO, AO It has been said of British government that, at its heart “lies a mystery – the Constitution, the rules of the game under which power is fought for, then distributed or constrained once gained”, and that “the system by which government operates baffles ministers themselves – let alone MPs, commentators and the general public”.1 Having served the Australian system of government for the whole of my working life, I believe these words apply equally to Australia. As two Commonwealth Government inquiries have shown, Australians are abysmally ignorant of just how they are governed or what their Constitution says and means.2 This lack of knowledge on the part of the electorate has enabled republicans to misrepresent our present Constitution and to deceive and mislead the Australian people about the changes they wish to make to it. Earlier this year, in a speech to the National Press Club, Andrew Robb, convenor of Conservatives for an Australian Head of State, was sharply critical of the draft wording of the question to appear on the referendum ballot paper, saying its failure to refer to the replacement of the British monarch by an Australian citizen would have a negative impact and provoke a negative reaction from people.3 He also objected to the inclusion of the word “Republic” on the ballot paper.4 And only this week, in a submission to the Joint Select Committee on the Republic Referendum, Malcolm Turnbull said the terms “Republic” and “President” should be dropped from the referendum question because people do not understand what they mean.5 Two days later, responding to the ridicule and condemnation which resulted, Turnbull changed his submission to the Parliamentary Committee and conceded that these terms might stay.6 He proposed instead that the question refer to the President replacing the Queen as Head of State.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Implications of Implementations What Makes a Tax System Politically
    The Implications of Implementations What makes a tax system politically acceptable? A review of the evidence Sally-Ann Joseph* 1. Introduction The political impact of the tax law should not be underestimated. There is nowhere where the intersection between the people and their government is as important as in the area of taxation. Indeed, it is the people that fund the government through their labour, capital and consumption. As the sources of the money that the government spends, people expect tax issues not only to be prominent on the public political agenda but also to conform to the principles of equity, efficiency and simplicity. While this century has seen few countries embrace new tax regimes, Australia has bucked this trend. There has been the goods and services tax, the carbon tax and two mining taxes: the resources super profits tax (RSPT) and the mining resource rent tax (MRRT). Effective tax reform requires both sound principles of public finance and political acceptability.1 This paper focuses on what is required, politically, when implementing a new tax regime. After a brief introduction in section 2 to the Australian political landscape and government regulatory guidelines, section 3 explores the lessons to be learnt from the RSPT and MRRT. This is followed in section 4 by an analysis of these taxes against the tax design principles of efficiency, equity and simplicity. Section 5 contains concluding remarks. 2. The Australian political landscape 2.1 Parliament Australia has a Westminster-style government where the Parliament consists of both the Executive and Legislature. This can be contrasted to other forms of government, such as that in the United States, where the Executive is separate from, and not directly answerable to, the Legislature.
    [Show full text]
  • David Flint Looks at Recent US Attempts at Law Reform Editing That the Press Council Found Changed a Letter's Meaning * Professi
    2 AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL NEWS, FEBRUARY 1994 arrived unanimously at the opposite Remember, this is the Innisfail The extent of that implied outcome. The law in NSW, of course, Advocate we are talking about, not The constitutional protection is extremely was not the same as that in Sydney Morning Herald. qualified. Nevertheless, the thinking Queensland. And the defamatory material in behind it may well have been a silent influence on the w ay the court saw But that is not the point. The issue is question was a small advertisement, the contending interests. the procedure used by the court to not a painstaking expose on public balance the competing interests. finances in another country. This approach may also have been influenced by recent criticism from In 1988, the rights of defamed Filipino All of this, however, was not a legal academics Stephanie Palmer and businessman Eduardo Cojuangco statement of legal principle and may Ian Cram. In separate articles in 1992, were so important that the court lead to nothing. But it does raise the they stated that English courts actually saw them as part of the tantalising possibility that the High generally give the free flow of public interest in the administration Court may be changing the way it information insufficient weight of justice. balances the contending interests in whenever it is part of a judicial Such a grand description obviously cases involving free speech. balance. weighed heavily in the judicial The balance between individual balance, so heavily that it was By definition, the harm caused to the reputation and the broader interest of considered to be "paramount".
    [Show full text]
  • Cheque-Book Journalism
    CHEQUE-BOOK JOURNALISM 1. Introduction 2. Background to the debate: the Rose West trial 3. Definitions 4. Why are the payments made? 5. Why not ban the practice? 6. The public interest 7. Cheque-book journalism and the law 8. Copyright 9. Payments in court cases: Contempt of Court Act 1981 10. Codes of conduct 11. Remedies 1. Introduction PressWise accepts that there are legitimate occasions when payments are made by editors in return for information. However enticing people to supply 'exclusive' information with offers of large sums of money is a pernicious corruption of the notion of press freedom, especially since the primary purpose is usually to boost the circulation/profits of a newspaper. The purchase of an 'exclusive' which has the effect of restricting access to important information or limiting the choice of the public should be avoided. PressWise advises people NOT to sell the exclusive rights to their story, largely because few appreciate the longer-term consequences of such 'deals'. They lose control of their lives and their image because they rarely retain the right to influence how the material is used or presented. Editorial control remains in the hands of the editor, and as a result many become 'victims of press abuse'. When a newspaper pays for an exclusive, rival publications seek to undermine it with 'spoilers'. Little thought is given to the effect this can have on the 'victim'. People who sell their story are regarded as 'fair game' in the circulation battles that ensue. Women in 'kiss and sell' stories often discover too late the risk of being branded for their actions; others are victimised because newspapers encourage informants to embellish the stories the papers want to buy.
    [Show full text]