Biochemistry-Faculty of Medicine

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biochemistry-Faculty of Medicine FORMAT FOR SUBJECTWISE IDENTIFYING JOURNALS BY THE UNIVERSITIES AND APPROVAL OF THE UGC {Under Clause 6.05 (1) of the University Grants Commission (Minimum Qualifications for appointment of Teacher and Other Academic Staff in Universities and Colleges and Measures for the Maintenance of Standards in Higher Education (4th Amendment), Regulations, 2016} Subject: BIOCHEMISTRY, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences A. Refereed Journals Sl. Name of the Journal Publisher and Year of Hard e-publication ISSN Number Peer / Indexing status. Impact Do you use Any other No. place of Start copies (Yes/No) Refree If indexed, Factor/Rating. any Information publication published Reviewed Name of the Name of the IF exclusion (Yes/No) (Yes/No) indexing data assigning agency. criteria for base Whether covered Research by Thompson & Journals Reuter (Yes/No) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 As Per MCI 1 American Journal of Human Genetics 0002-9297 Elsevier Inc America Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines John Wiley & Sons, As Per MCI 2 American Journal of Medical Genetics 0148-7299 Inc. Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 3 American Journal of Medicine 0002-9343 Elsevier Inc America Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 4 Amino Acids 0939-4451 Springer Vienna 1991 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 5 Analytical Biochemistry 0003-2697 Elsevier Inc America 1960 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines John Wiley & Sons, As Per MCI 6 Annals of Applied Biology 0003-4746 Inc. USA 1911 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Agri Bio Publishers As Per MCI 7 Annals of Biology 0970-0153 India 1986 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines John Wiley & Sons, As Per MCI 8 Annals of Human Genetics 0003-4800 Inc. 1925 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Annals of the New York Academy of John Wiley & Sons, As Per MCI 9 0077-8923 Sciences Inc. 1824 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 10 Annual Review of Biochemistry 0066-4154 Annual Reviews USA 1932 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 11 Annual Review of Genetics 0066-4197 Annual Reviews USA 1967 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Sl. Name of the Journal Publisher and Year of Hard e-publication ISSN Number Peer / Indexing status. Impact Do you use Any other No. place of Start copies (Yes/No) Refree If indexed, Factor/Rating. any Information publication published Reviewed Name of the Name of the IF exclusion (Yes/No) (Yes/No) indexing data assigning agency. criteria for base Whether covered Research by Thompson & Journals Reuter (Yes/No) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 As Per MCI 12 Annual Review of Immunology 0732-0582 Annual Reviews USA 1983 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 13 Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology 0273-2289 Springer Vienna 1976 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 14 Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 0003-9861 Elsevier Inc America 1951 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines The AAS Asia Pacific Journal of Molecular Biology 15 Journals Janice 0128-7451 As Per MCI and Biotechnology Sexton 1998 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Biochemical and Biophysical Research Elsevier Inc America As Per MCI 16 0006-291X Communications USA 1959 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 17 Biochemical Genetics 0006-2928 Springer USA 1967 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Portland Press As Per MCI 18 Biochemical Journal 0264-6021 Limited London UK 1906 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 19 Biochemistry (Washington) 0006-2960 ACS Publications Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Elsevier Inc America As Per MCI 20 Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 0006-3002 USA 1947 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Elsevier Inc America As Per MCI 21 Biochimie 0300-9084 USA 1971 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Walter de Gruyter As Per MCI 22 Biological Chemistry Hoppe-Seyler 0177-3593 Gmb Germany 1878 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Taylor & Francis As Per MCI 23 0916-8451 Biochemistry England 1924 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Informa BioSciences As Per MCI 24 Biotechniques 0736-6205 USA 1983 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Sl. Name of the Journal Publisher and Year of Hard e-publication ISSN Number Peer / Indexing status. Impact Do you use Any other No. place of Start copies (Yes/No) Refree If indexed, Factor/Rating. any Information publication published Reviewed Name of the Name of the IF exclusion (Yes/No) (Yes/No) indexing data assigning agency. criteria for base Whether covered Research by Thompson & Journals Reuter (Yes/No) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 American Society of 25 Blood Hematology 0006-4971 As Per MCI DC 1946 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines BMJ BMA House 26 British Medical Journal London United 0007-1447 As Per MCI Kingdom 1840 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines World Health Organization 27 Bulletin of the World Health Organization Geneva 27 0042-9686 As Per MCI Switzerland 1948 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines American 28 Cancer Research Association for 0008-5472 As Per MCI Cancer Research USA 1916 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 29 Cell 0092-8674 Elsevier Inc. USA 1974 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 30 Cell Calcium (Edinburgh) 0143-4160 Elsevier Inc. USA 1980 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines 31 Cellular and Molecular Biology C.M.B. Association 0145-5680 As Per MCI Poitiers, FRANCE 1997 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 32 Cellular Immunology 0008-8749 Elsevier Inc. USA 1970 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 33 Cellular Signalling 0898-6568 Elsevier Inc. USA 1989 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines John Wiley & Sons, As Per MCI 34 Clinical and Experimental Immunology 0009-9104 Inc. 1990 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Sl. Name of the Journal Publisher and Year of Hard e-publication ISSN Number Peer / Indexing status. Impact Do you use Any other No. place of Start copies (Yes/No) Refree If indexed, Factor/Rating. any Information publication published Reviewed Name of the Name of the IF exclusion (Yes/No) (Yes/No) indexing data assigning agency. criteria for base Whether covered Research by Thompson & Journals Reuter (Yes/No) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 35 0305-0491 As Per MCI B: Comparative Biochemistry Elsevier Inc. USA 1995 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Begell House 36 Critical Reviews in Immunology Publishers 50 North 1040-8401 As Per MCI Street Danbury, CT 1994 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 37 Current Biology 0960-9822 Elsevier Inc. USA 1990 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 38 Current Genetics 0172-8083 Springer USA 1979 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 39 Current Opinion in Cell Biology 0955-0674 Elsevier Inc. USA 1989 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 40 Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 0959-437X Elsevier Inc. USA 1991 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 41 Current Opinion in Immunology 0952-7915 Elsevier Inc. USA 1988 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines WW Business 42 Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases Offices United 0951-7375 As Per MCI Kingdom 1988 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Current Science 43 Current Science Association, 0011-3891 As Per MCI Bengaluru. 1932 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Current Topics in Microbiology and As Per MCI 44 0070-217X Immunology Springer USA Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Cambridge, Eng., As Per MCI 45 Cytobios 0011-4529 Faculty Press. Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 46 Cytogenetics and Cell Genetics 0301-0171 Karger AG, Base Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Sl. Name of the Journal Publisher and Year of Hard e-publication ISSN Number Peer / Indexing status. Impact Do you use Any other No. place of Start copies (Yes/No) Refree If indexed, Factor/Rating. any Information publication published Reviewed Name of the Name of the IF exclusion (Yes/No) (Yes/No) indexing data assigning agency. criteria for base Whether covered Research by Thompson & Journals Reuter (Yes/No) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 As Per MCI 47 Cytokines and Molecular Therapy 1355-6568 Informa Group plc 1997 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines International 48 Cytologia (International Journal of Cytology) Academic Printing 0011-4545 As Per MCI Co., Ltd. 1929 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines The Company of As Per MCI 49 Development 0950-1991 Biologists 1953 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 50 Developmental Biology 0012-1606 Elsevier Inc. USA 1959 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines The University of As Per MCI 51 Developmental Genetics 0192-253X Leicester UK Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 52 Developmental Immunology 1044-6672 Elsevier Inc. USA 1977 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Ann Liebert, Inc. As Per MCI 53 DNA and Cell Biology 1044-5498 publishers Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Macmillan As Per MCI 54 Drug Discovery 1359-6446 Publishers Limited Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines INFLIBNET Centre 55 EMBO Journal Info & Library 0261-4189 As Per MCI Network Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines As Per MCI 56 Enzyme and Microbial Technology 0141-0229 Elsevier Inc. USA 1979 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines EOS, Journal of Immunology and Federation of 57 0392-6699 Immunopharmacology European As Per MCI Biochemical Societies 1967 Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines John Wiley & Sons, As Per MCI 58 European Journal of Biochemistry 0014-2956 Inc. Yes Yes Yes Yes Guidelines Sl. Name of the Journal Publisher and Year of Hard e-publication ISSN Number Peer / Indexing status. Impact Do you use Any other No. place of Start copies (Yes/No) Refree If indexed, Factor/Rating. any Information publication published Reviewed Name of the Name of the IF exclusion (Yes/No) (Yes/No) indexing data assigning agency.
Recommended publications
  • Biomedical Text Mining: a Survey of Recent Progress
    Chapter 14 BIOMEDICAL TEXT MINING: A SURVEY OF RECENT PROGRESS Matthew S. Simpson Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications United States National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health [email protected] Dina Demner-Fushman Lister Hill National Center for Biomedical Communications United States National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health [email protected] Abstract The biomedical community makes extensive use of text mining tech- nology. In the past several years, enormous progress has been made in developing tools and methods, and the community has been witness to some exciting developments. Although the state of the community is regularly reviewed, the sheer volume of work related to biomedical text mining and the rapid pace in which progress continues to be made make this a worthwhile, if not necessary, endeavor. This chapter pro- vides a brief overview of the current state of text mining in the biomed- ical domain. Emphasis is placed on the resources and tools available to biomedical researchers and practitioners, as well as the major text mining tasks of interest to the community. These tasks include the recognition of explicit facts from biomedical literature, the discovery of previously unknown or implicit facts, document summarization, and question answering. For each topic, its basic challenges and methods are outlined and recent and influential work is reviewed. Keywords: Biomedical information extraction, named entity recognition, relations, events, summarization, question answering, literature-based discovery C.C. Aggarwal and C.X. Zhai (eds.), Mining Text Data, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-3223-4_14, 465 © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 466 MINING TEXT DATA 1.
    [Show full text]
  • MEDLINE® Comprehensive Biomedical and Health Sciences Information
    ValuaBLE CONTENT; HIGhly FOCUSED seaRCH capaBILITIES MEDLINE® COMPREHENSIVE BIOmedical AND health SCIENCES INFORmatiON WHAT YOU’LL FIND WHAT YOU CAN DO • Content from over 5,300 journals in • Keep abreast of vital life sciences information 30 languages, plus a select number of • Uncover relevant results in related fields relevant items from newspapers, magazines, and newsletters • Identify potential collaborators with significant citation records • Over 17 million records from publications worldwide • Discover emerging trends that help you pursue successful research and grant acquisition • Approximately 600,000 records added annually • Target high-impact journals for publishing • Links from MEDLINE records to the valuable your manuscript NCBI protein and DNA sequence databases, and to PubMed Related Articles • Integrate searching, writing, and bibliography creation into one streamlined process • Direct links to your full-text collections • Fully searchable and indexed backfiles to 1950 • Full integration with ISI Web of Knowledge content and capabilities GLOBAL COVERAGE AND SPECIALIZED INDEXING ACCESS THE MOST RECENT INFORMAtion — AS MEDLINE is the U.S. National Library of Medicine® WELL AS BACKFILES TO 1950 (NLM®) premier bibliographic database, covering Discover the most recent information by viewing biomedicine and life sciences topics vital to biomedical MEDLINE In-Process records, recently added records practitioners, educators, and researchers. You’ll find that haven’t yet been fully indexed. And track nearly 60 coverage of the full range of disciplines, such as years of vital backfile data to find the supporting — or medicine, life sciences, behavioral sciences, chemical refuting — data you need. More backfiles give you the sciences, and bioengineering, as well as nursing, power to conduct deeper, more comprehensive searches dentistry, veterinary medicine, the health care system, and track trends through time.
    [Show full text]
  • Information-Seeking Behavior in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM): an Online Survey of Faculty at a Health Sciences Campus*
    Information-seeking behavior in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM): an online survey of faculty at a health sciences campus* By David J. Owen, M.L.S., Ph.D. [email protected] Education Coordinator, Basic Sciences Min-Lin E. Fang, M.L.I.S. [email protected] Information Services Librarian Kalmanovitz Library and Center for Knowledge Management University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, California 94143-0840 Background: The amount of reliable information available for complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is limited, and few authoritative resources are available. Objective: The objective is to investigate the information-seeking behavior of health professionals seeking CAM information. Methods: Data were gathered using a Web-based questionnaire made available to health sciences faculty af®liated with the University of California, San Francisco. Results: The areas of greatest interest were herbal medicine (67%), relaxation exercises (53%), and acupuncture (52%). About half the respondents perceived their CAM searches as being only partially successful. Eighty-two percent rated MEDLINE as a useful resource, 46% personal contacts with colleagues, 46% the Web, 40% journals, and 20% textbooks. Books and databases most frequently cited as useful had information about herbs. The largest group of respondents was in internal medicine (26%), though 15% identi®ed their specialties as psychiatry, psychology, behavioral medicine, or addiction medicine. There was no correlation between specialty and patterns of information- seeking behavior. Sixty-six percent expressed an interest in learning more about CAM resources. Conclusions: Health professionals are frequently unable to locate the CAM information they need, and the majority have little knowledge of existing CAM resources, relying instead on MEDLINE.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Biomedical Records Through Text Mining-Driven Complex Data Visualisation
    medRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.27.21250248; this version posted March 29, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Exploring biomedical records through text mining-driven complex data visualisation Joao Pita Costa Luka Stopar Luis Rei Institute Jozef Stefan Institute Jozef Stefan Institute Jozef Stefan Ljubljana, Slovenia Ljubljana, Slovenia Ljubljana, Slovenia [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Besher Massri Marko Grobelnik Institute Jozef Stefan Institute Jozef Stefan Ljubljana, Slovenia Ljubljana, Slovenia [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT learning technologies that have been entering the health domain The recent events in health call for the prioritization of insightful at a slow and cautious pace. The emergencies caused by the recent and meaningful information retrieval from the fastly growing pool pandemics and the need to act fast and accurate were a motivation of biomedical knowledge. This information has its own challenges to fast forward some of the modernization of public health and both in the data itself and in its appropriate representation, enhanc- healthcare information systems. Though, the amount of available ing its usability by health professionals. In this paper we present information and its heterogeneity creates obstacles in its usage in a framework leveraging the MEDLINE dataset and its controlled meaningful ways. vocabulary, the MeSH Headings, to annotate and explore health- related documents. The MEDijs system ingests and automatically annotates text documents, extending their legacy metadata with MeSH Headings.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Application of Text Mining to Biomedical Knowledge Extraction: Analyzing Clinical Narratives and Medical Literature
    Amy Neustein, S. Sagar Imambi, Mário Rodrigues, António Teixeira and Liliana Ferreira 1 Application of text mining to biomedical knowledge extraction: analyzing clinical narratives and medical literature Abstract: One of the tools that can aid researchers and clinicians in coping with the surfeit of biomedical information is text mining. In this chapter, we explore how text mining is used to perform biomedical knowledge extraction. By describing its main phases, we show how text mining can be used to obtain relevant information from vast online databases of health science literature and patients’ electronic health records. In so doing, we describe the workings of the four phases of biomedical knowledge extraction using text mining (text gathering, text preprocessing, text analysis, and presentation) entailed in retrieval of the sought information with a high accuracy rate. The chapter also includes an in depth analysis of the differences between clinical text found in electronic health records and biomedical text found in online journals, books, and conference papers, as well as a presentation of various text mining tools that have been developed in both university and commercial settings. 1.1 Introduction The corpus of biomedical information is growing very rapidly. New and useful results appear every day in research publications, from journal articles to book chapters to workshop and conference proceedings. Many of these publications are available online through journal citation databases such as Medline – a subset of the PubMed interface that enables access to Medline publications – which is among the largest and most well-known online databases for indexing profes- sional literature. Such databases and their associated search engines contain important research work in the biological and medical domain, including recent findings pertaining to diseases, symptoms, and medications.
    [Show full text]
  • Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK TABLE OF CONTENTS XXX . • Description p.1 • Audience p.1 • Impact Factor p.2 • Abstracting and Indexing p.2 • Editorial Board p.2 • Guide for Authors p.4 ISSN: 0006-291X DESCRIPTION . BBRC -- the fastest submission-to-online journal! From Submission to Online in Less Than 3 Weeks! Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications is the premier international journal devoted to the very rapid dissemination of timely and significant experimental results in diverse fields of biological research. The development of the "Breakthroughs and Views" section brings the minireview format to the journal, and issues often contain collections of special interest manuscripts. BBRC is published weekly (52 issues/year). Research Areas now include: • Biochemistry • Bioinformatics • Biophysics • Cancer Research • Cell Biology • Developmental Biology • Immunology • Molecular Biology • Neurobiology • Plant Biology • Proteomics Benefits to authors We also provide many author benefits, such as free PDFs, a liberal copyright policy, special discounts on Elsevier publications and much more. Please click here for more information on our author services. Please see our Guide for Authors for information on article submission. If you require any further information or help, please visit our Support Center AUDIENCE . Biochemists, bioinformaticians, biophysicists, immunologists, cancer researchers, stem cell scientists and neurobiologists. AUTHOR INFORMATION PACK 24 Sep 2021 www.elsevier.com/locate/ybbrc
    [Show full text]
  • Document Clustering of Medline Abstracts for Concept Discovery in Molecular Biology
    Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 6:384-395 (2001) TEXTQUEST: DOCUMENT CLUSTERING OF MEDLINE ABSTRACTS FOR CONCEPT DISCOVERY IN MOLECULAR BIOLOGY I. ILIOPOULOS, A. J. ENRIGHT, C. A. OUZOUNIS Computational Genomics Group, The European Bioinformatics Institute, EMBL Cambridge Outstation, Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK {ioannis, anton, christos}@ebi.ac.uk We present an algorithm for large-scale document clustering of biological text, obtained from Medline abstracts. The algorithm is based on statistical treatment of terms, stemming, the idea of a ‘go-list’, unsupervised machine learning and graph layout optimization. The method is flexible and robust, controlled by a small number of parameter values. Experiments show that the resulting document clusters are meaningful as assessed by cluster-specific terms. Despite the statistical nature of the approach, with minimal semantic analysis, the terms provide a shallow description of the document corpus and support concept discovery. 1. Introduction The vast accumulation of electronically available textual information has raised new challenges for information retrieval technology. The problem of content analysis was first introduced in the late 60’s [1]. Since then, a number of approaches have emerged in order to exploit free-text information from a variety of sources [2, 3]. In the fields of Biology and Medicine, abstracts are collected and maintained in Medline, a project supported by the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM)1. Medline constitutes a valuable resource that allows scientists to retrieve articles of interest, based on keyword searches. This query-based information retrieval is extremely useful but it only allows a limited exploitation of the knowledge available in biological abstracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Accounts of Chemical Research 8 (1975) - 21, 22 {1-11}, 23 - 30 (1997)
    A Accounts of Chemical Research 8 (1975) - 21, 22 {1-11}, 23 - 30 (1997) Acta Chemica Scandinavica 1 (1947) - 27 (1973) : Acta Chemica Scandinavica. 1974 - 1988 : Ser. Aと Ser. B . に分離 A 28 (1974) - A 42 (1988) : Ser. A : Physical and Inorganic Chemistry B 28 (1974) - B 42 (1988) : Ser. B : Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry 43 (1989) : 合併 Acta Chemica Scandinavica. 1 (1947) - 51 (1997) Acta Phytotaxonomica et Geobotanica →APG * Advances in Analytical Chemistry and Instrumentation 1 (1960) - 11 (1973) * Advances in Biological and Medical Physics 10 (1965) - 17 (1980) * Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry → Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry * Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry 1 (1945) - 23 (1968) : Advances in Carbohydrate Chemistry 1 (1945) - 61 (2007) 62 (2008) + : 電子ジャーナル * Advances in Catalysis 1 (1948) - 21 (1970) : Advances in Catalysis and Related Subjects 1 (1948) - 41 (1996) * Advances in Catalysis and Related Subjects → Advances in Catalysis * Advances in Chemical Engineering 1 (1956) - 23 (1996) * Advances in Chemical Physics 1 (1958) - 58, 60 - 93, 95 - 96 (1996) * Advances in Clinical Chemistry 1 (1958) - 31 (1994) * Advances in Drug Research 1 (1964) - 12 (1977) * Advances in Electrochemistry and Electrochemical Engineering 1 1 (1961) - 13 (1984) * Advances in Enzyme Regulation 1 (1963) - 33 (1993) * Advances in Enzymology * Advances in Enzymology and Related Subjects * Advances in Enzymology and Related Subjects of Biochemistry → Advances in Enzymology and Related Areas of Molecular Biology
    [Show full text]
  • Medline Vs Embase
    MEDLINE VS EMBASE Prior to starting a search, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database. The principal sources used to search topics related to biomedicine and health Medline and Embase. What are their characteristics? Medline Embase1 Focus Biomedicine and health Broad biomedical scope with in-depth coverage of drugs and pharmacology Produced by US National Library of Medicine Elsevier Access Available free of charge via PubMed OR Through institutional subscription via Ovid. Through institutional subscription via Ovid. Available via MUHC libraries portal Available via MUHC libraries portal muhclibraries.ca > Quick Links section muhclibraries.ca > Quick Links section Content Journal articles, mostly from peer-reviewed Journal articles, mostly from peer-reviewed journals journals + conference abstracts since 2009 # of records Over 30 million Over 32 million, including all Medline records Including 26 million indexed for Medline (i.e. 6 million are unique to Embase) # of journals 5,244 indexed for Medline Almost 8,500, including Medline unique journals (i.e. more than 2900 journals unique to Embase) 1 https://www.elsevier.com/solutions/embase-biomedical-research/embase-coverage-and-content The searcher should also be familiar with differences in the establishment of subject headings in each database. These differences impact the way we search and the results. Medline MeSH Embase Emtree2 # of terms 29,351 Over 75,000 (of which more than 32,000 are drugs and chemicals) # of 83 78 (of which 64 are drug subheadings subheadings including routes of drug administration) Synonyms 681,5053 320,000 Thesaurus Annually 3 times per year update Drug terms are included when they become Drug terms are included early in the drug established development process # of terms per 10-20 3-4 major terms, and up to 50 minor terms.4 article Medline-derived articles are not indexed with Emtree terms.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Sciences Librarians' Engagement in Open Science: A
    Health sciences librarians’ engagement in open science: A scoping review Project Team: Dean Giustini Kevin Read Ariel Deardorff Lisa Federer Melissa Rethlefsen MLA Annual Conference, May 2021 Health sciences librarians’ engagement in open science: A scoping review Objectives: To identify health sciences librarians’ (HSLs) engagement in open science (OS) through the delivery of library services, support, and programs for researchers. Methods: We performed a scoping review guided by Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) framework and Joanna Briggs’ Manual for scoping reviews. Our search methods consisted of searching five databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, LISTA, and Web of Science Core Collection), tracking citations, contacting experts, and targeted web searching. We used Zotero to manage citations, and Covidence for screening. To determine study eligibility, we applied predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, achieving consensus among reviewers when there was disagreement. Finally, we extracted data in duplicate and performed qualitative analysis to map key themes. Results & discussion HSL Open Science Scoping Review / Giustini, Read, Deardorff, Federer, Rethlefsen / MLA ‘21 Health sciences librarians’ engagement in open science: A scoping review Results: We identified 54 included studies (after reviewing 8173 citations / 319 full text studies). Research methods included descriptive or narrative approaches (76%), surveys, questionnaires and interviews (15%) or mixed methods (9%). Using FOSTER’s Open Science Taxonomy, we labeled studies using six themes: open access (54%), open data (43%), open science (24%), and open education, open source and citizen science (17%). Key drivers in OS were scientific integrity and transparency, openness as a guiding principle, and funder mandates making research openly-accessible. HSLs engaged in OS advocacy and most examples came from academic institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • SCIENCE CITATION INDEX EXPANDED - JOURNAL LIST Total Journals: 8631
    SCIENCE CITATION INDEX EXPANDED - JOURNAL LIST Total journals: 8631 1. 4OR-A QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH 2. AAPG BULLETIN 3. AAPS JOURNAL 4. AAPS PHARMSCITECH 5. AATCC REVIEW 6. ABDOMINAL IMAGING 7. ABHANDLUNGEN AUS DEM MATHEMATISCHEN SEMINAR DER UNIVERSITAT HAMBURG 8. ABSTRACT AND APPLIED ANALYSIS 9. ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 10. ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 11. ACADEMIC MEDICINE 12. ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS 13. ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY 14. ACCOUNTABILITY IN RESEARCH-POLICIES AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 15. ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH 16. ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 17. ACI MATERIALS JOURNAL 18. ACI STRUCTURAL JOURNAL 19. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS 20. ACM JOURNAL ON EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS 21. ACM SIGCOMM COMPUTER COMMUNICATION REVIEW 22. ACM SIGPLAN NOTICES 23. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON ALGORITHMS 24. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON APPLIED PERCEPTION 25. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON ARCHITECTURE AND CODE OPTIMIZATION 26. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON AUTONOMOUS AND ADAPTIVE SYSTEMS 27. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTATIONAL LOGIC 28. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER SYSTEMS 29. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTER-HUMAN INTERACTION 30. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON DATABASE SYSTEMS 31. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON DESIGN AUTOMATION OF ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS 32. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON EMBEDDED COMPUTING SYSTEMS 33. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON GRAPHICS 34. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION AND SYSTEM SECURITY 35. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS 36. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY 37. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON INTERNET TECHNOLOGY 38. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY FROM DATA 39. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE 40. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MODELING AND COMPUTER SIMULATION 41. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA COMPUTING COMMUNICATIONS AND APPLICATIONS 42. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES AND SYSTEMS 43. ACM TRANSACTIONS ON RECONFIGURABLE TECHNOLOGY AND SYSTEMS 44.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology & Biochemistry
    Top Peer Reviewed Journals – Biology & Biochemistry Presented to Iowa State University Presented by Thomson Reuters Biology & Biochemistry The subject discipline for Biology & Biochemistry is made of 14 narrow subject categories from the Web of Science. The 14 categories that make up Biology & Biochemistry are: 1. Anatomy & Morphology 8. Cytology & Histology 2. Biochemical Research Methods 9. Endocrinology & Metabolism 3. Biochemistry & Molecular Biology 10. Evolutionary Biology 4. Biology 11. Medicine, Miscellaneous 5. Biology, Miscellaneous 12. Microscopy 6. Biophysics 13. Parasitology 7. Biotechnology & Applied Microbiology 14. Physiology The chart below provides an ordered view of the top peer reviewed journals within the 1st quartile for Biology & Biochemistry based on Impact Factors (IF), three year averages and their quartile ranking. Journal 2009 IF 2010 IF 2011 IF Average IF ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOCHEMISTRY 29.87 29.74 34.31 31.31 PHYSIOLOGICAL REVIEWS 37.72 28.41 26.86 31.00 NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY 29.49 31.09 23.26 27.95 CANCER CELL 25.28 26.92 26.56 26.25 ENDOCRINE REVIEWS 19.76 22.46 19.92 20.71 NATURE METHODS 16.87 20.72 19.27 18.95 ANNUAL REVIEW OF BIOPHYSICS AND 18.95 18.95 BIOMOLECULAR STRUCTURE ANNUAL REVIEW OF PHYSIOLOGY 18.17 16.1 20.82 18.36 Annual Review of Biophysics 19.3 17.52 13.57 16.80 Nature Chemical Biology 16.05 15.8 14.69 15.51 NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR 12.27 13.68 12.71 12.89 BIOLOGY PLOS BIOLOGY 12.91 12.47 11.45 12.28 TRENDS IN BIOCHEMICAL SCIENCES 11.57 10.36 10.84 10.92 QUARTERLY REVIEWS OF BIOPHYSICS
    [Show full text]