4.2 Progressive Systemic Scleroderma

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

4.2 Progressive Systemic Scleroderma 4.2 Progressive Systemic Scleroderma Nicolas Hunzelmann and Thomas Krieg Introduction Systemic sclerosis (SSc) belongs to the group of “diffuse inflammatory con- nective tissue diseases” or “collagen vascular diseases” comprising a variety of severe, sometimes life-threatening systemic diseases which often have a chronic, debilitating course. SSc is characterized by the involvement of the skin and various internal organs (e.g. kidney, lung, heart). The inflammatory and fibrotic process destroys the normal architecture of the affected organs leading to dysfunction and failure. The disease activity is highly variable and often unpredictable. The severity of the disease process in SSc leads to a re- duced lifespan, impaired mobility and loss of autonomy. SSc mainly evolves along pathological changes of the vascular system, the immune system and of the extracellular matrix including its major cell type, the fibroblast. The resulting fibrosis leading to atrophy and failure of the af- fected organs largely determines the outcome of the disease process. How- ever, despite intense research efforts the relationship and interaction between the pathophysiological processes affecting the vascular system, the immune system and the extracellular matrix are only incompletely understood. Immune Dysregulation One of the hallmarks of SSc is a perturbed immunoregulation (resulting in the presence of autoantibodies), which appears to be influenced by additional factors such as genetic and exogenous factors. Autoimmunity in SSc is char- acterized by HLA gene restricted autoantibody responses against nuclear and nucleolar antigens. The mechanisms inducing the antibody production are unknown but clinical associations with autoantibody specificities suggest that these antigen-restricted responses are involved in disease specific pathology. These autoimmune phenomena are in a not well understood way related to the inflammatory process with lymphocytic perivascular infiltrates in the skin 166 Nicolas Hunzelmann and Thomas Krieg and lung evident early on in the disease process and preceding the develop- ment of fibrosis. The similarity of the condition with some aspects of graft versus host disease has frequently been noted. Recently it was suggested that microchimerism, i.e. the persistence of foetal cells in the maternal bone marrow and other organs like the skin might be a risk factor, also explaining the female excess (Artlett et al. 1998; Evans et al. 1999). However, subsequent studies found similar frequencies of microchimerisms compared to normal controls but nevertheless an increased number of microchimeric fetal cells in patients (Burastero et al 2003). Vascular Pathology The relationship between autoimmune responses and the vascular pathol- ogy is unclear, as Raynaud’s syndrome and vascular abnormalities may be evident many years prior to the onset of disease (Blockmans et al. 1996). The morphological changes that can be observed on a ultrastructural level, i.e. basement membrane thickening, intimal hyperplasia and inflammatory cell infiltration have been interpreted as a sign indicating microvascular injury as a primary event in this disease (Prescott et al. 1992). Depending on the study population and statistical methodology, between 5 and 20% of all individuals presenting with Raynaud’s phenomenon are re- ported to subsequently develop SSc. A constellation of additional signs and symptoms indicative of microvascular damage separates SSc patients from others presenting with Raynaud’s phenomenon. These include nailfold capil- laroscopic changes (Maricq et al. 1980), hand/foot edema, digital ulcers, cal- cifications and teleangiectasia. The combination of a fibrotic microvascular and hyperreactive vasoconstrictor status is thought to represent the primary lesion responsible for the vasospastic episodes. Tissue hypoxia normally in- duces new blood vessel growth by induction of a variety of angiogenic fac- tors. In SSc, loss of capillaries is a typical and early disease manifestation which has been related to an increase in angiostatic factors and programmed endo- thelial cell death (apoptosis) where a number of possible mechanisms have been proposed (Sgonc et al. 1996; Kahaleh and Fan 1997; Hebbar et al, 2000). A recent study suggests that latent cytomegalovirus infection contributes to the known phenomenon of endothelial cell cytotoxicity of scleroderma se- rum by identifying IgG autoantibodies that bind a cytomegalovirus protein and induce apoptosis in human endothelial cells (Lunardi et al. 2000). Dysregulation of Extracellular Matrix Synthesis The dysregulation of extracellular matrix synthesis is the third major patho- physiologic change, with the extent and progression of the fibrotic process Progressive Systemic Scleroderma 167 being important prognostic factors in the disease process. It has been well established by in situ hybridization and by fibroblast cultures obtained from involved tissue (e.g. skin or lung) that scleroderma fibroblasts display an ac- tivated phenotype producing increased amounts of various collagens and expressing adhesion molecules such as ICAM-1 (LeRoy et al. 1974; Uitto et al. 1979; Scharffetter et al. 1988; Majewski et al. 1995). The newly synthe- sized extracellular matrix is deposited particularly around skin appendages and at the border of the dermis to the subcutaneous tissue, partially replac- ing the latter (Perlish et al. 1985). The collagen bundles running parallel with the skin surface show swelling and variation in thickness. Although the bio- synthesis of collagens has been investigated in detail, its metabolism and turnover in vivo is not yet fully understood. In physiological situations in- volving increased collagen synthesis, as e.g. in wound healing, the amount of collagen in the tissue is obviously tightly controlled by its similarly increased degradation. Similarly, in a fibrotic disease, the net gain of collagens must thus involve a disturbed balance between the synthetic and degradative pro- cesses. The most commonly used approach to study collagen degradation is the study of collagen degrading enzymes (Herrmann et al. 1991; Mauch et al. 1998). However, the results are difficult to interprete in terms of the in vivo situation, as a combination of several enzymes including the corresponding inhibitors are likely to be involved in the degradation of a single collagen fi- ber. A different approach to this question is to study the degradation prod- ucts as they appear in vivo. Interestingly, we and others could demonstrate that increased levels of ICTP, a degradation product of cross-linked type I collagen, are common in patients with SSc (Heickendorff et al. 1995; Hunzel- mann et al. 1998b). They correlate well with the skin score, a commonly used indicator of the severity of the disease (Subcommittee of the ARA 1980; Kaha- leh et al. 1986). This indicates that the concentrations of circulating ICTP re- flect the type I collagen load in this disease. We found the highest values in patients with very active and extensive disease. Recently, a study on the uri- nary excretion of two mature cross-links of collagen, hydroxylysyl and lysyl pyridinoline, also suggested that in SSc more fibrillar collagens are degraded than in the normal state (Stone et al. 1995). Furthermore these crosslinks can usually only be detected in bone, suggesting that occurence of these crosslinks in the skin is related to the sclerotic process. Therefore these studies indicate that the increased deposition of type I collagen is accompanied by an increased turnover and altered crosslink formation of this molecule, indicating an even more complex derangement of synthetic and degradative processes in this disease than previously acknowledged. The factors which finally lead to the activated phenotype of scleroderma fibroblasts are not entirely clear. Several studies suggest the contribution of transforming growth factor-b (TGF-b) (Kulozik et al. 1990), a potent inducer of collagen synthesis, to the progression of skin sclerosis. This notion is fur- ther supported by the detection of connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) gene expression in skin biopsies of SSc patients (Igarashi et al. 1995) and SSc 168 Nicolas Hunzelmann and Thomas Krieg fibroblasts (Shi-Wen et al. 2000) as TGF-b is also known to induce CTGF. Recent studies indicate that a deficiency in SMAD-7 an inhibitory protein in the TGF-b signalling pathway is characteristic of scleroderma fibroblasts (Dong et al. 2002). The increased biosynthesis of collagen is accompanied by an el- evation of the steady-state mRNA levels in vitro and in vivo of about 1.5–2x which appears to be due to both increased transcriptional activation as well as increased mRNA stability (Eckes et al. 1996; Jimenez and Saitta, 2000). Clinical Appearence/Classification The incidence of SSc is reported to be 2–20/million population and the prev- alence 4–290/million population. Based on distinct clinical aspects and courses of the disease an internationally accepted classification was established with two forms: limited cutaneous SSc (lSSc) and diffuse cutaneous SSc (dSSc). The disease is much commoner in females than males for reasons that are not entirely clear with a female-to-male ratio of 3–9:1. There are some popu- lations at high risk as e.g. the Choctaw Indians from Oklahoma suggesting that genetic factors are critical. However, twin studies are inconclusive and familial aggregation is rare. Both forms, however, lead to life threatening involvement of internal organs and large areas
Recommended publications
  • Idiopathic Spiny Keratoderma: a Report of Two Cases and Literature Review
    Idiopathic Spiny Keratoderma: A Report of Two Cases and Literature Review Jessica Schweitzer, DO,* Matthew Koehler, DO,** David Horowitz, DO*** *Intern, Largo Medical Center, Largo, FL **Dermatology Resident, Third Year, College Medical Center/Western University, Long Beach, CA ***Dermatology Residency Program Director, College Medical Center/Western University, Long Beach, CA Abstract Spiny keratoderma is a rare and likely underreported condition that presents with punctate hyperkeratotic growths localized to the palms and soles. We present two cases of clinically diagnosed spiny keratoderma. Although the lesions were asymptomatic, patients are at risk of an underlying internal malignancy with this condition, so diagnosis is crucial. Neither men were seeking treatment for the lesions when they were discovered, suggesting that this condition may be much more common than reported. Patients with histories of manual labor, increased UV exposure, and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) may also be at higher risk for developing spiny keratoderma.1 The epidemiology, histopathologic features, differential diagnosis, and current treatments for spiny keratoderma are reviewed. Introduction Case 2 enthusiast for his entire life, spending significant Spiny keratoderma is a rare palmoplantar A 67-year-old Caucasian male presented with a time using his hands to maintain and fire his keratoderma that presents with keratotic, pinpoint one-year history of insidiously growing, pinpoint weapons and many hours outside without sun papules on the palms and soles. There are both hyperkeratotic papules projecting from his palms protection. The patient was referred back to his hereditary and acquired forms. When found, bilaterally (Figures 4-5). He presented to the clinic primary care physician for internal evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Reasoning
    RESIDENT & FELLOW SECTION Clinical Reasoning: Section Editor A 49-year-old woman with progressive Mitchell S.V. Elkind, MD, MS motor deficit Ana Monteiro, MD SECTION 1 strength, and difficulty protruding the tongue, without Amélia Mendes, MD A previously healthy 49-year-old woman presented with fasciculations or atrophy. Symmetrical tetraparesis Fernando Silveira, MD progressive motor deficit. The complaints started the (proximal-greater-than-distal weakness) and increased Lígia Castro, MD year before with weakness of the right arm. Over the tone were noted, with severe pain upon mobilization Goreti Nadais, MD subsequent months, she developed weakness in the left and palpation of joints and muscles. Deep tendon reflexes arm, followed by both legs, and, finally, difficulty speak- were brisk and symmetric, with bilateral flexor plantar ing, with nasal voice, and swallowing. It was increasingly responses. There was atrophy of the interosseous muscles Correspondence to difficult to attend to her chores, and, by the time she of the hands and shoulder girdle muscle wasting. Dr. Monteiro: sought medical attention, she needed help with all daily [email protected] Questions for consideration: activities. In the last few weeks, she also complained of diffuse joint and muscle pain. Medical and family history 1. How do you localize the symptoms: upper motor were unremarkable. neuron (UMN) or lower motor neuron (LMN), Neurologic examination showed bilateral facial weak- neuromuscular junction (NMJ), peripheral nerve, ness, severe dysarthria, dysphonia and dysphagia (nau- or muscle? What is the broad differential? seous reflex preserved), decreased shoulder elevation 2. What findings on examination would be helpful? GO TO SECTION 2 Supplemental data at Neurology.org From the Departments of Neurology (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding and Managing Scleroderma
    Understanding and Managing Scleroderma A publication of Scleroderma Foundation 300 Rosewood Drive, Suite 105 Danvers, MA 01923 Maureen D. Mayes, M.D., M.P.H. Understanding and Understanding My notes and Managing Scleroderma Managing Scleroderma This booklet is intended to help people with scleroderma, their families and others interested ________________________ in learning more about the disease to better understand what scleroderma is, what effects ________________________ it may have, and what those with scleroderma can do to help themselves and their physicians ________________________ manage the disease. It answers some of the most frequently asked questions about ________________________ A publication of Maureen D. Mayes, M.D., M.P.H. Scleroderma Foundation 300 Rosewood Drive, Suite 105 scleroderma. Danvers, MA 01923 800-722-HOPE (4673) www.scleroderma.org www.facebook.com/sclerodermaUS www.twitter.com/scleroderma ________________________ Disclaimer The Scleroderma Foundation does not provide medical advice nor does it ________________________ endorse any drug or treatment mentioned herein. ________________________ The material contained in this booklet is presented for general information only. It is not intended to provide medical advice, to answer questions specific to the condition or problems of particular individuals, nor in ________________________ any way to substitute for the professional advice and care of qualified physicians. Mention of particular drugs and/or treatments is for ________________________ information purposes only and does not constitute an endorsement of said drugs and/or treatments. ________________________ Thanks! ________________________ The Scleroderma Foundation expresses its deep appreciation to the many ________________________ physicians whose efforts have led to this booklet. Special thanks are owed to Maureen D. Mayes, M.D., M.P.H., of the ________________________ University of Texas McGovern Medical School, Houston.
    [Show full text]
  • The Voice of the Patient
    The Voice of the Patient A series of reports from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) Patient-Focused Drug Development Initiative Systemic Sclerosis Public Meeting: October 13, 2020 Report Date: June 30, 2021 Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1 Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 Overview of Systemic Sclerosis ................................................................................................................. 3 Meeting Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Report Overview and Key Themes ............................................................................................................ 5 Topic 1: Disease Symptoms and Daily Impacts That Matter Most to Patients .......................... 6 Perspectives on Most Significant Symptoms ............................................................................................ 6 Overall Impact of Systemic Sclerosis on Daily Life .................................................................................... 9 Topic 2: Patient Perspectives on Treatments for Systemic Sclerosis ....................................... 11 Perspectives on Current Treatments ...................................................................................................... 11 Perspectives on Ideal
    [Show full text]
  • Dermatological Findings in Common Rheumatologic Diseases in Children
    Available online at www.medicinescience.org Medicine Science ORIGINAL RESEARCH International Medical Journal Medicine Science 2019; ( ): Dermatological findings in common rheumatologic diseases in children 1Melike Kibar Ozturk ORCID:0000-0002-5757-8247 1Ilkin Zindanci ORCID:0000-0003-4354-9899 2Betul Sozeri ORCID:0000-0003-0358-6409 1Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Department of Dermatology, Istanbul, Turkey. 2Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, Department of Child Rheumatology, Istanbul, Turkey Received 01 November 2018; Accepted 19 November 2018 Available online 21.01.2019 with doi:10.5455/medscience.2018.07.8966 Copyright © 2019 by authors and Medicine Science Publishing Inc. Abstract The aim of this study is to outline the common dermatological findings in pediatric rheumatologic diseases. A total of 45 patients, nineteen with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), eight with Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF), six with scleroderma (SSc), seven with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and five with dermatomyositis (DM) were included. Control group for JIA consisted of randomly chosen 19 healthy subjects of the same age and gender. The age, sex, duration of disease, site and type of lesions on skin, nails and scalp and systemic drug use were recorded. χ2 test was used. The most common skin findings in patients with psoriatic JIA were flexural psoriatic lesions, the most common nail findings were periungual desquamation and distal onycholysis, while the most common scalp findings were erythema and scaling. The most common skin finding in patients with oligoarthritis was photosensitivity, while the most common nail finding was periungual erythema, and the most common scalp findings were erythema and scaling. We saw urticarial rash, dermatographism, nail pitting and telogen effluvium in one patient with systemic arthritis; and photosensitivity, livedo reticularis and periungual erythema in another patient with RF-negative polyarthritis.
    [Show full text]
  • Visual Recognition of Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases
    Seeing the Signs: Visual Recognition of Autoimmune Connective Tissue Diseases Utah Association of Family Practitioners CME Meeting at Snowbird, UT 1:00-1:30 pm, Saturday, February 13, 2016 Snowbird/Alta Rick Sontheimer, M.D. Professor of Dermatology Univ. of Utah School of Medicine Potential Conflicts of Interest 2016 • Consultant • Paid speaker – Centocor (Remicade- – Winthrop (Sanofi) infliximab) • Plaquenil – Genentech (Raptiva- (hydroxychloroquine) efalizumab) – Amgen (etanercept-Enbrel) – Alexion (eculizumab) – Connetics/Stiefel – MediQuest • Royalties Therapeutics – Lippincott, – P&G (ChelaDerm) Williams – Celgene* & Wilkins* – Sanofi/Biogen* – Clearview Health* Partners • 3Gen – Research partner *Active within past 5 years Learning Objectives • Compare and contrast the presenting and Hallmark cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus and dermatomyositis • Compare and contrast the presenting and Hallmark cutaneous manifestations of morphea and systemic sclerosis Distinguishing the Cutaneous Manifestations of LE and DM Skin involvement is 2nd most prevalent clinical manifestation of SLE and 2nd most common presenting clinical manifestation Comprehensive List of Skin Lesions Associated with LE LE-SPECIFIC LE-NONSPECIFIC Cutaneous vascular disease Acute Cutaneous LE Vasculitis Leukocytoclastic Localized ACLE Palpable purpura Urticarial vasculitis Generalized ACLE Periarteritis nodosa-like Ten-like ACLE Vasculopathy Dego's disease-like Subacute Cutaneous LE Atrophy blanche-like Periungual telangiectasia Annular Livedo reticularis
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Various Diagnostic Methods to Detect Antinuclear Antibodies of Connective Tissue Diseases
    DOI: 10.7860/NJLM/2021/48042:2492 Review Article An Overview of Various Diagnostic Methods to Detect Antinuclear Antibodies of Microbiology Section Microbiology Connective Tissue Diseases SAIKEERTHANA DURAISAMY ABSTRACT Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA) are present in many autoimmune disorders and these disorders are collectively called as Connective Tissue Diseases (CTD). There are various CTDs which include Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE), Sjogren’s syndrome, Systemic Sclerosis (SS), Inflammatory Myositis (IM), Mixed Connective Tissue Disorder (MCTD) and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Detection of ANAs in these CTDs is highly sensitive and is of utmost importance. The ANAs specific to SLE includes antidouble stranded Deoxyribonucleic Acid (antidsDNA), single stranded DNA (ssDNA). Scleroderma or Systemic Sclerosis (SS) is an immune mediated rheumatic disease where autoantibodies like topoisomerase 1, Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) polymerase 1 and fibrillarin are useful in diagnosis. Idiopathic Inflammatory Myositis (IIM) such as polymyositis and dermatomyositis are characterised by the presence of autoantibodies like PM-scl (Polymyositis-Scleromyositis), Mi-1 (Myositis specific autoantibody found in idiopathic inflammatory myositis), Mi-2 and Ku (DNA Binding Protein in dermatomyositis). Antibody titres against polypeptides on the U1 Ribonucleoprotein (U1RNP) is useful in the detection mixed CTD. Sjogren’s syndrome is characterised by the presence of serum autoantibodies against two ribonucleoproteinic complexes like Ro/SSA (Extractable nuclear antigen found in Sjogren's syndrome related antigen A auto antibodies) and La/SSB (Extractable nuclear antigen found in Sjogren's syndrome or lupus erythematous). ANA analysis can be done by techniques like indirect immunofluorescence method, Enzyme Linked Immuno Sorbent Assay (ELISA), Immunoprecipitation in agar and western blotting. All these diagnostic methods give precise identification of these antibodies with high accuracy.
    [Show full text]
  • An Unusual Course in Bullous Morphea
    Case Report An Unusual Course in Bullous Morphea İlknur Kıvanç Altunay, MD, Hilal Kaya Erdoğan*, MD, Nurhan Döner, MD, Damlanur Sakız,1 MD. Address: Dermatology and 1Pathology Departments, Şişli Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, 34377, Turkey. * Corresponding Author: Dr. Hilal Kaya Erdoğan, Şisli Etfal Training and Research Hospital. Istanbul, 34377, Turkey. E-mail: [email protected] Published: J Turk Acad Dermatol 2010; 4 (4): 04401c This article is available from: http://www.jtad.org/2010/4/jtad04401c.pdf Key Words: bullous morphea, drug reaction Abstract Observations: We report a 75-year-old woman with bullous morphea characterized by disseminated erythemato-pigmentous plaques and a few blisters on some morphea plaques at the beginning of first visit. While she was under narrow band UV therapy, she discontinued the treatment and refused to have any more after 13 sessions. One month later, she reapplied with extensive bullae and facial edema with severe itching. We learned that she had taken naproxen sodium one a day for two days ten days ago. Bullous drug reaction was diagnosed and systemic cortisone was started. She was in remission after fifteen days. The patient had very different clinical picture on her second visit with extensive, large and cadaverous bullae, facial eryhtema and edema. It seems to be a bullous drug reaction based on bullous morphea. However, it remains a mystery whether this clinical presentation is a peculiar drug reaction or is really a mere exacerbation of existed bullous morphea. Introduction noprost eye drop and tolterodine. These medicati- ons had been used for over a year. Her family his- Bullae formation in lesions of morphea is an tory was unremarkable.
    [Show full text]
  • The Articular Manifestations of Progressive Systemic Sclerosis (Scleroderma) MURRAY BARON, PETER LEE, and EDWARD C
    Ann Rheum Dis: first published as 10.1136/ard.41.2.147 on 1 April 1982. Downloaded from Annals ofthe Rheumatic Diseases, 1982, 41, 147-152 The articular manifestations of progressive systemic sclerosis (scleroderma) MURRAY BARON, PETER LEE, AND EDWARD C. KEYSTONE From the University of Toronto Rheumatic Disease Unit, The Wellesley Hospital, 160 Wellesley Street East, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4Y 1J3 SUMMARY The articular manifestations of progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) were studied in 38 patients. Of these, 66 % experienced joint pain and 61 % had signs of joint inflammation. Limita- tion of joint movement was seen in 45 %. Radiological abnormalities included periarticular osteoporosis (42 %), joint space narrowing (34%), and erosions (40%). Erosive disease did not correlate with disease duration, presence of rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies, distal tuft resorption, or the extent of the scleroderma skin changes. Calcinosis was seen more frequently in those patients with articular erosions (67 %). Erosive osteoarthritis of the distal interphalangeal joints (7 patients) was associated with impaired finger flexion. Joint involvement in PSS occurs frequently and may resemble rheumatoid arthritis in the early stages but is less destructive. The occurrence of unrelated arthropathy, such as primary osteoarthritis, is not uncommon, and its differentiation from true PSS joint disease can be difficult. Articular manifestations are common in progressive spective study and fulfilling the preliminary diagnos- systemic sclerosis (scleroderma, PSS), and joint pain tic criteria for PSS1 were evaluated by one author is a frequent presenting feature of this disease.' Joint (M.B.). A history of joint manifestations was symptoms have been noted in 12 to 66% of patients obtained in each case according to a standard pro- http://ard.bmj.com/ at the time of diagnosis2`6 and in 24 to 97% of tocol.
    [Show full text]
  • A Acanthosis Nigricans, 139 Acquired Ichthyosis, 53, 126, 127, 159 Acute
    Index A Anti-EJ, 213, 214, 216 Acanthosis nigricans, 139 Anti-Ferc, 217 Acquired ichthyosis, 53, 126, 127, 159 Antigliadin antibodies, 336 Acute interstitial pneumonia (AIP), 79, 81 Antihistamines, 324 Adenocarcinoma, 115, 116, 151, 173 Anti-histidyl-tRNA-synthetase antibody Adenosine triphosphate (ATP), 229 (Anti-Jo-1), 6, 14, 140, 166, 183, Adhesion molecules, 225–226 213–216 Adrenal gland carcinoma, 115 Anti-histone antibodies (AHA), 174, 217 Age, 30–32, 157–159 Anti-Jo-1 antibody syndrome, 34, 129 Alanine aminotransferase (ALT, ALAT), 16, Anti-Ki-67 antibody, 247 128, 205, 207, 255 Anti-KJ antibodies, 216–217 Alanyl-tRNA synthetase, 216 Anti-KS, 82 Aldolase, 14, 16, 128, 129, 205, 207, 255, 257 Anti-Ku antibodies, 163, 165, 217 Aledronate, 325 Anti-Mas, 217 Algorithm, 256, 259 Anti-Mi-2 Allergic contact dermatitis, 261 antibody syndrome, 11, 129, 215 Alopecia, 62, 199, 290 antibodies, 6, 15, 129, 142, 212 Aluminum hydroxide, 325, 326 Anti-Myo 22/25 antibodies, 217 Alzheimer’s disease-related proteins, 190 Anti-Myosin scintigraphy, 230 Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, 151, 166, 182, Antineoplastic agents, 172 212, 215 Antineoplastic medicines, 169 Aminoquinolone antimalarials, 309–310, 323 Antinuclear antibody (ANA), 1, 141, 152, 171, Amyloid, 188–190 172, 174, 213, 217 Amyopathic DM, 6, 9, 29–30, 32–33, 36, 104, Anti-OJ, 213–214, 216 116, 117, 147–153 Anti-p155, 214–215 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 263 Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), 127, Antisynthetase syndrome, 11, 33–34, 81 130, 219 Anaphylaxi, 316 Anti-PL-7 antibody, 82, 214 Anasarca,
    [Show full text]
  • Scleroderma Phenotype'' This Information Is Current As of September 27, 2021
    Autoantibodies to Fibrillin-1 Activate Normal Human Fibroblasts in Culture through the TGF-β Pathway to Recapitulate the ''Scleroderma Phenotype'' This information is current as of September 27, 2021. Xiaodong Zhou, Filemon K. Tan, Dianna M. Milewicz, Xinjian Guo, Constantin A. Bona and Frank C. Arnett J Immunol 2005; 175:4555-4560; ; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.7.4555 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/175/7/4555 Downloaded from References This article cites 32 articles, 11 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/175/7/4555.full#ref-list-1 http://www.jimmunol.org/ Why The JI? Submit online. • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication by guest on September 27, 2021 *average Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. The Journal of Immunology Autoantibodies to Fibrillin-1 Activate Normal Human Fibroblasts in Culture through the TGF-␤ Pathway to Recapitulate the “Scleroderma Phenotype”1 Xiaodong Zhou,2* Filemon K. Tan,* Dianna M.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Frictional Hyperkeratosis (FK)
    Patient information Oral frictional hyperkeratosis (FK) What is oral frictional hyperkeratosis? Hyperkeratinisation - excessive growth of stubbornly attached keratin (a fibrous protein produced by the body) - may happen for a number of reasons, and may be genetic (runs in the family), physiological e.g. due to friction from a sharp tooth, pre-malignant (pre-cancerous) and malignant (cancerous). The change may result from chemical, heat or physical irritants. Friction (the constant rubbing of two surfaces against each other) in the mouth may result in benign (non-cancerous) white patches. Various names have been used to describe particular examples of FK, including those resulting from excessive tooth-brushing force (toothbrush keratosis), the constant rubbing of the tongue against the teeth (tongue thrust keratosis), and that produced by the habit of chronic cheek or lip biting (cheek or lip bite keratosis). What are the signs and symptoms of FK? Most patients with FK are free of symptoms. A patient may notice a thickening of an area of skin in the mouth, or FK may be discovered by accident during a routine oral examination. What are the causes of FK? The white patches of FK that develop in the mouth are formed in the same way that calluses form on the skin of hands and feet. The most common causes are long term tissue chewing (biting the inside of the cheek or lips), ill-fitting dentures, jagged teeth, poorly adapted dental fillings or caps, and constant chewing on jaws that have no teeth. The constant irritation encourages the growth of keratin, giving the skin involved a different thickness and colour.
    [Show full text]