Maine State Legislature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maine State Legislature MAINE STATE LEGISLATURE The following document is provided by the LAW AND LEGISLATIVE DIGITAL LIBRARY at the Maine State Law and Legislative Reference Library http://legislature.maine.gov/lawlib Reproduced from scanned originals with text recognition applied (searchable text may contain some errors and/or omissions) •• A Report to the Joint Standing Committee on Natural Resources February 2001 Prepared by: Maine Department of Environmental Protection Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................... i Executive Summary ..................... : .................................................... ii Chapter 1 Purpose . 1 · Chapter 2Mobile Source Emissions ...................................................... 3 A. Air Emissions ....................................................................... 3 B. Transportation Trends ............................................................. 4 Chapter 3 Motor Vehicle Information ................................................ ; .. 5 A. Vehicle Registrations ................ : ............................................. 5 B. Vehicles Titled (Purchased) ...................................................... 6 C. Purchaser Information ............................................................ 10 Chapter 4 Existing Strategies ............................................................ 12 A. Cleaner Fuels ............ : .......................................................... 12 1. Maine's Current Fuels Program ............................................... 12 2. Federal Low Sulfur Gasoline Standards ...................................... 13 3. Federal Toxics Emission Standards for Gasoline ............................ 14 4. Federal Diesel Low Sulfur Fuel ................................................ 14 B. Maintaining the Vehicles on our Roads ....................................... 15 1. Inspection and Maintenance Programs ......................................... 15 2. Heavy-Duty Diesel Testing ...................................................... 16 C. Cleaner New Cars and Trucks .................................................. 18 1. Maine's Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) Program ............................ 18 2. Federal New Car Emission Standards ......................................... 20 3. Federal Heavy-Duty Engine and Vehicle Standards ......................... 22 D. Transportation Control Measures (TCM) ..................................... 23 1. TCMs .............................................................................. 23 2. Conformity ........................................................................ 25 Chapter 5 Alternative Strategies ................. :, ...................................... 26 A. Fuels .................................................................................. 26 1. NESCA UM/ Mid Atlantic Regional Fuels Task Force .................... 26 2. Alternative Clean Fuels ......................................................... 27 B. Inspection and Maintenance Programs .......................................... 30 1. Alternative Methods of Testing Vehicles .................................... 30 C. Transportation Control Measures ............................................... 32 1. Accelerated Vehicle Retirement. ............................................... 32 D. Education and Incentives .......................................................... 36 1. Incentives ........................................................................... 36 1 2. Mobile Sources Outreach Programs ........................................... 36 E. Government Procurement ................................... ·...................... 39 Chapter 6 Process .......................................................................... 40 Figures and Tables Figure 1. 1996 VOC and NOx Emissions ............................................... 3 Table 1. Mobile Source Air Toxics ..................................................... 4 Figure 2. Percent Increase from 1985 to 1995 ......................................... 4 Figure 3. Vehicle Registrations by Model Year ........................................ 5 Figure 4. Vehicle Registrations by Age ................................................. 5 Table 2. Top 20 Vehicles Registered in Maine ....................................... 6 Table 3. Top 20 Model Year 2000 (NEW) Titled Vehicles ......................... 7 Table 4. Top 20 Used Titled Vehicles .................................................. 8 Figure 5. Age Distribution of Used Vehicles Purchased in Year 2000 . 8 Table 5. Used Car Prices ................................................................. 9 Figure 6. Vehicle Purchaser by Gender ................................................ 10 Figure 7. Year 2000 Vehicle Purchasers by Age ..................................... 10 .Table 6. Year 2000 Vehicle Purchasers by Weighted Age ..................... : ... 11 Table 7 Transportation Control Measures ......................................... : ... 23 Appendices Appendix A. Vehicles Registered in Maine (January 2001) Appendix B. Model Year 2000 Vehicles Titled in Maine in Year 2000 Appendix C. Used Vehicles Titled in Maine in Year 2000 Appendix D. Used Vehicle Purchaser Information Appendix E. EPA Environmental Fact Sheets Appendix F. State Laws and Regulations: Incentives for Electric Vehicles and Alternative Fueled Vehicles Attached State Innovations to Reduce Vehicle Emissions, National Governors' Association, (2000) 2 Acknowledgements The Department gratefully acknowledges the assistance of David Schultz and Richard Zidowecki from the Bureau of Motor Vehicles for their contributions of motor vehicle registration and title data. The Department also extends its appreciation to Sheilla Lynch from the Northeast Advanced Vehicle Consortium for the State Law and Regulation summary of alternative vehicle incentives. 1 Executive Summary This report summarizes existing and alternative mobile source emissions reduction strategies. These mobile source strategies include strategies either implemented or being considered by the State of Maine, the United States Environmental Protection Agency or other states. Motor vehicles are significant emitters of a number of pollutants including carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds, carbon dioxide, and hazardous air pollutants such as benzene. While motor vehicle emission control devices have dramatically reduced pollutant emissions per vehicle during the past 20 years, the number of cars and trucks on the road, and the number of miles they are driven, have doubled. This growth in vehicle travel is offsetting the progress achieved through improved vehicle emission controls. Motor vehicle registration data indicates that the average age of a vehicle on Maine roads is 8. 7 years. The 1993 Ford Escort is the most registered vehicle. In year 2000 the GMC Sierra pick-up truck is the commonly purchased new vehicle; the Ford F150 pick-up truck is the most commonly purchased used vehicle. Reducing emissions from these so-called mobile sources diminishes the risk of health problems associated with poor air quality. Generally, mobile source control strategies fall into four categories: using cleaner fuels for the vehicles, driving cleaner new vehicles, properly maintaining existing vehicles and reducing either the number of vehicles on the road or the number of miles they are driven. Strategies chosen may be mandatory or voluntary, contain elements of public education, and/or include incentives to make the strategy more attractive. Maine's experience runs the gamut of these options. Fuels. Gasoline is the predominant fuel for motor vehicles used in Maine. Nearly 700 million gallons of gasoline and 150 million gallons of diesel were sold in Maine in 1999. In order to reduce air pollutants that form ground-level ozone and hazardous air pollutants, in 1994 Maine voluntarily participated in the federal Reformulated Gasoline (RFG) program. Concerns about groundwater contamination due to elevated levels of the additive used in the RFG sold in Maine (MTBE) prompted the State to withdraw from this program in 1998. In 11 its place Maine now requires a low volatility (evaporates less readily) gasoline in the seven southern counties to reduce emissions. (The remaining counties are subject to minimal federal standards for volatility.) The Department is currently working with other northeast states to identify a regional fuel which will provide the same air quality benefits of reformulated gasoline without the increased risk of groundwater contamination. The Department has also supported the development of vehicles that run on fuels other than gasoline or diesel. Alternative fuels include, but are not limited to, natural gas, electricity, alcohol fuels (such as ethanol and methanol), propane, and bio-diesel. Vehicles burning these fuels can use original equipment or be conversions. Increased use of alternative fuels provides for better energy security by reducing use of imported oil and for improved air quality. The largest hurdles to overcome in terms of encouraging the use of alternative fuels are the lack of existing infrastructure to deliver the fuel and the increased cost of the vehicles and/or fuel. In-Use Vehicle Maintenance. In 1994, to identify vehicles in need of a tune-up or work on vehicle pollution control equipment, Maine implemented the nation's first state-of-the-art, centralized, vehicle emissions testing program (IM240) in the seven southern
Recommended publications
  • Comment 1 for ZEV 2008 (Zev2008) - 45 Day
    Comment 1 for ZEV 2008 (zev2008) - 45 Day. First Name: Jim Last Name: Stack Email Address: [email protected] Affiliation: Subject: ZEV vehicles Comment: The only true ZEV vehicles are pure electric that chanrge on renewables Today 96% of the hydrogen is made from fossil fuels. This can be improved on but will take a long time. Today we already have very good Electric Vehicles liek the RAV4 with NiMH batteries that have lasted over 100,000 miles. Too bad Toyota stopped making it. We also have the Tesla and Ebox. Please do what is right. Jim Attachment: Original File Name: Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-02-16 11:19:59 No Duplicates. Comment 2 for ZEV 2008 (zev2008) - 45 Day. First Name: Star Last Name: Irvine Email Address: [email protected] Affiliation: NEV Owner Subject: MSV in ZEV regulations Comment: I as a NEV owner (use my OKA NEV ZEV about 3,000 miles annually) would like to see MSV (Medium Speed Vehicles) included in ZEV mandate so they can be available in California. I own two other vehicles FORD FOCUS and FORD Crown Vic. I my OKA NEV could go 35 MPH I would drive it at least twice as much as I currently do, and I would feel much safer doing so. 25 MPH top speed for NEV seriously limits its use and practicality for every day commuting. Attachment: Original File Name: Date and Time Comment Was Submitted: 2008-02-19 23:07:01 No Duplicates. Comment 3 for ZEV 2008 (zev2008) - 45 Day. First Name: Miro Last Name: Kefurt Email Address: [email protected] Affiliation: OKA AUTO USA Subject: MSV definition and inclusion in ZEV 2008 Comment: We believe that it is important that the ZEV regulations should be more specific in definition of "CITY" ZEV as to its capabilities and equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dispatcher
    ie 1 September 2015 Volume 2, Issue 5 The Dispatcher Telematics Industry Insights by Michael L. Sena Special interest features covered A Car Hacking in St. Louis in each issue: WHAT SHOULD NEVER HAVE HAPPENED DID HAPPEN. Two WHO ARE THE CAR HACKERS? • Autonomous and researchers (see sidebar) were able to successfully Charlie Miller and Chris Self- driving Cars • Big Data break through whatever security shields Fiat Chrysler Valasek are the dynamic due • DSRC versus Automobiles and Sprint set up around its UConnect on- responsible for performing the Wireless board systems and wireless network to take control over feat of hacking the Jeep Cherokee. According to the Communication the most mission critical functions of a Jeep Cherokee. Starting with the climate controls, the radio and the Wired article, Charlie Miller is a • Connected security researcher for Twitter Vehicles – V2V windshield wipers, the attackers moved to the and a former US National and V2I transmission and the brakes. Eventually, the car was Security Agency (NSA) hacker. • Third party brought to a standstill on a major artery in St. Louis, Chris Valasek is the director of services for eCall Missouri in the US. The driver of the vehicle, Andy vehicle security research at Greenberg, a journalist with Wired Magazine, was a IOActive, a consultancy. This is willing victim, but his description of his experience in not the first time they have Wired indicated that he was truly frightened while he sat teamed up to show that connected vehicles are helpless in the vehicle while it was being controlled Individual Highlights: vulnerable to cyber-attacks.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation by Barbara Gonzalez
    2011 DC Electric Vehicle Forum December 12, 2011 PEV’s Opportunities and Challenges Barbara M. Gonzalez Manager - Special Projects, NERC Advance Technology Pepco Holdings, Inc. Serving three states and Washington DC in the Mid-Atlantic US Combined Service Territory Transmission & Distribution – 90% of Revenue Competitive Energy / Other PHI Investments Regulated transmission and distribution is PHI’s core business. 1 Copyright 2011 Pepco Holdings, Inc. 1 PHI Business Overview PowerPower Delivery Delivery Electric Electric Gas Electric Customers 767,000 498,000 122,000 547,000 GWh 26,863 13,015 N/A 10,089 Mcf (000’s) N/A N/A 20,300 N/A Service 640 5,000 275 2,700 Area District of Columbia, Major portions Northern Southern (square miles) major portions of of Delmarva Delaware New Jersey & Prince George’s and Peninsula Geography Montgomery Counties Population 2.1 million 1.3 million .5 million 1.1 million PHI History with Electric Vehicles • Member of DOE Site Operator Program – Maintained a fleet of 6 all-electric conversion vehicles • Founding Member of EV America – Developed first utility standards for electric vehicles – Later turned over to DOE • GM PrEView Drive Program – 60 customer drivers for two weeks at a time – Installed over 75 Level 2 chargers • Toyota RAV4 EV Program • Ford Ranger EV Program 3 3 Plug-In Vehicles are coming…. Here • Penetration projections are inconsistent • Initial Impacts to infrastructure will be due to clustering • Significant penetration is still years away • Washington, DC region is expected to be an early target market for several manufacturers EPRI National Projection for Plug-In Vehicle Penetration OEM Deployment in the Washington, DC Region • Ford Transit Connect 2010 • Chevy Volt 2011 • Nissan Leaf 2011 • Ford Focus 2011 • Ford PHEV 2012 • Fisker Nina PHEV 2012 • Tesla 2012 • BMW Megacity 2013 4 Projections ……… In order to estimate demand for PEVs, population and number of vehicles per capita of the PHI service territories was used as a proxy for actual car sales.
    [Show full text]
  • Koenigsegg to Embark on Evolutionary Journey for Future Growth
    Koenigsegg to embark on evolutionary journey for future growth Press release 29 January 2019, Ängelholm, Sweden Koenigsegg AB is forming a strategic partnership with NEVS AB, enabling the development of parallel vehicle models in slightly higher volumes with emphasis on electrification, as well as strengthening growth opportunities in the hyper car segment. NEVS is making a capital injection of EUR 150 million, thereby taking a 20 percent minority stake in Koenigsegg’s parent company. Additionally, the parties are forming a joint venture to expand into new market segments where NEVS AB is contributing USD 150 million in starting capital for a 65 percent stake and Koenigsegg obtains 35 percent by contributing primarily with intellectual property, technology licenses, and product design. The partnership will deepen an already existing collaboration between Koenigsegg and NEVS, creating synergies between their geographical footprints, experiences and competencies. Koenigsegg already has a distinguished unique market position for hyper cars, and through the additional joint venture NEVS and Koenigsegg are partnering up to develop a product for new and untapped segments, leveraging both of the companies’ strengths. Through NEVS production facilities in Trollhättan, Koenigsegg will access additional capabilities as well as benefiting from the extensive automotive knowledge in the region, whilst maintaining their centre of excellence in Ängelholm. Alongside NEVS capacity for production in Trollhättan and China, NEVS through its majority owner Evergrande, has a wide distribution platform and channels through ownership in one of China’s largest car retailers. “Koenigsegg is breaking new ground, capitalising on our unique technology, performance track record and market position to explore and develop new products.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Board Book, September 7-8, 2000
    . 7 SUMMARY OF BOARD ITEM ITEM # 00-8-3: 2000 ZERO EMISSION VEHICLE PROGRAM BIENNIAL REVIEW DISCUSSION: The Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) program was adopted in 1990 as part of the Low-Emission Vehicle regulations. When the ZEV requirement was first adopted, low- and zero-emission vehicle technology was in a very early stage of development. The Board acknowledged that many issues would need to be addressed prior to the implementation date. The Board directed staff to provide an update on the ZEV program on a biennial basis, in order to provide a context for the necessary policy discussion and deliberation. SUMMARY AND IMPACTS: At this 2000 Biennial Review, the staff will present to the Board its assessment of the current status of ZEV technology and the prospects for improvement in the near- and long-term. Major issues addressed include market demand for ZEVs, cost, and environmental and energy benefits. To help assess the current status of technology and the environmental impact of the program, ARB has funded research projects to examine the performance, cost and availability of advanced batteries, fuel cycle emissions from various automotive fuels, and the fuel cycle energy conversion efficiency for various fuel types. In preparation for this 2000 Biennial Review, ARB staff has solicited input from interested, parties throughout the process. As part of this effort, workshops were held in March and May/June 2000. Draft versions of the Staff Report have been available to the public since March 2000. The Board will consider information presented by staff and all interested parties. 8 9 CALIFORNIA AIR RESOURCES BOARD - NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING FOR THE BIENNIAL REVIEW OF THE ZERO EMISSION VEHICLE REGULATION The California Air Resources Board (Board or ARB) will conduct a public meeting at the time and place noted below to review the Zero Emission Vehicle regulation and progress towards its implementation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of Saab Automobile AB from Core Capabilities Into Core Rigidities - a Trajectory Towards Demise
    Master Degree Project in Knowledge-based Entrepreneurship The case of Saab Automobile AB From core capabilities into core rigidities - A trajectory towards demise Giacomo Buzzoni and Magnus Eklund Supervisor: Evangelos Bourelos Master Degree Project No. 2016:148 Graduate School The Case of Saab Automobile AB From Core Capabilities into Core Rigidities - A Trajectory Towards Demise © Giacomo Buzzoni & Magnus Eklund School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg, Vasagatan 1, P.O. Box 600 SE 40530 Gothenburg, Sweden All rights reserved No part of this master thesis may be reproduced without prior written permission from the authors Acknowledgements First of all, we would like to thank our supervisor Evangelos Bourelos for his patience and effort in providing us with meaningful advice throughout these months of intense research. We would also like to express our appreciation and gratitude towards all our respondents who have allocated their valuable time to help us interpret this interesting case. Your passion, knowledge and commitment guided us through this journey, and we have enjoyed every single day of it. Finally, we would like to thank our peer students and all the people close to us for your support during our years of university studies. Without you, this would not have been possible. ABSTRACT This master thesis is addressing the case of Saab Automobile AB, creating a full historical reconstruction using primarily extensive quotes derived from semi-structured interviews with former Saab employees and other relevant actors. The aim is to depict and discuss the roots behind the company’s historically unique capabilities and its trajectory towards failure, together with the influence of General Motors’ ownership in this detrimental process.
    [Show full text]
  • 2001 Electric Ranger Wiring Diagrams Fcs-12887-01
    2001 ELECTRIC RANGER 2001 ELECTRIC RANGER VEHICLE WIRING DIAGRAMS FCS-12887-01 FORD CUSTOMER SERVICE DIVISION Quality is Job 1 Ford Customer Service Division has developed a new format for the 2001 Electric Ranger Wiring Diagrams. Our goal is to ORDERING INFORMATION provide accurate and timely electrical information. Information about how to order 2001 Wiring Diagrams Features additional copies of this publication or other Ford publications may be obtained D Schematic pages do not contain Component Location references to full-view illustrations and Component Descriptions by writing to Helm, Incorporated at the ad- that describe the system function of a component. (This information is available in CELL 152 Location Index or the Work- dress shown below or by calling shop Manual.) 1-800-782-4356. Other publications D “COMPONENT TESTING” procedures (CELL 149) that tell the user how to perform diagnostic tests on various circuits. available include: D NOTES, CAUTIONS and WARNINGS contain important safety information. D Workshop Manuals D Full view “COMPONENT LOCATION VIEWS” (CELL 151) to help locate on-vehicle components. D Service Specification Books D Circuit voltages have been added to schematic pages to help simplify troubleshooting. D Car/Truck Wiring Diagrams Nonessential troubleshooting hints have been deleted. D Powertrain Control/Emissions Diag- D Cellular Pagination: A specific section (or cell) in all Wiring Diagrams is numbered by cell and starts with page 1. For ex- nosis Manuals ample: “HOW TO USE THIS MANUAL” is CELL 2 and begins with page 2-1. D “CONNECTOR FACES” (CELL 150) will contain all connectors, to aid in servicing electrical wiring.
    [Show full text]
  • Electric and Hybrid Cars SECOND EDITION This Page Intentionally Left Blank Electric and Hybrid Cars a History
    Electric and Hybrid Cars SECOND EDITION This page intentionally left blank Electric and Hybrid Cars A History Second Edition CURTIS D. ANDERSON and JUDY ANDERSON McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Jefferson, North Carolina, and London LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGUING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Anderson, Curtis D. (Curtis Darrel), 1947– Electric and hybrid cars : a history / Curtis D. Anderson and Judy Anderson.—2nd ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-7864-3301-8 softcover : 50# alkaline paper 1. Electric automobiles. 2. Hybrid electric cars. I. Anderson, Judy, 1946– II. Title. TL220.A53 2010 629.22'93—dc22 2010004216 British Library cataloguing data are available ©2010 Curtis D. Anderson. All rights reserved No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying or recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. On the cover: (clockwise from top left) Cutaway of hybrid vehicle (©20¡0 Scott Maxwell/LuMaxArt); ¡892 William Morrison Electric Wagon; 20¡0 Honda Insight; diagram of controller circuits of a recharging motor, ¡900 Manufactured in the United States of America McFarland & Company, Inc., Publishers Box 611, Je›erson, North Carolina 28640 www.mcfarlandpub.com To my family, in gratitude for making car trips such a happy time. (J.A.A.) This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Initialisms ix Preface 1 Introduction: The Birth of the Automobile Industry 3 1. The Evolution of the Electric Vehicle 21 2. Politics 60 3. Environment 106 4. Technology 138 5.
    [Show full text]
  • MTBE and New Hampshire's Waters
    Remediating New Hampshire’s Groundwater A Comprehensive Study of MTBE in New Hampshire and Amicus Curiae Brief for State of New Hampshire v. Hess Corporation et al. A Major Qualifying Project Submitted to the faculty of Worcester Polytechnic Institute In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Bachelor of Arts In Environmental & Sustainability Studies Susan Brennan Project Advisor: Robert Krueger March 2, 2013 2 Abstract New Hampshire’s groundwater has been contaminated by the gasoline additive methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE), a chemical that has dramatic repercussions on the environment. Once in the groundwater, MTBE can be difficult and expensive to treat and remove. New Hampshire hopes to hold the oil corporations that used MTBE in their gasoline accountable for the pollution caused by the additive through the Superior Court case State of New Hampshire v. Hess Corporation et al. This project both summarizes background research on MTBE and its implications on New Hampshire’s groundwater, as well as provides an amicus curiae brief in support of the state of New Hampshire in the case against the oil corporations. 3 Table of Contents Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Technical Report What is MTBE? .............................................................................................................................................. 5 MTBE and United States Legislation ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Autotech Seminar September 25, 2019
    Autotech Seminar September 25, 2019 REDEYE AUTOTECH SEMINAR - 2019 1 AGENDA AUTOTECH SEMINAR 2019 09:30 Introduction Redeye, Viktor Westman, Analyst 09:35 Kungliga Tekniska Högskolan, Albin Engholm, Researcher 09:55 Veoneer, Tomas Jönsson, EVP Communications & IR 10:10 Smart Eye, Martin Krantz, CEO 10:25 Acconeer, Lars Lindell, CEO 10:40 Panel discussion: KTH, Veoneer, SmartEye, Acconeer 11:00 Opus Group, Per Rosén, President Europe 11:15 Diadrom, Henrik Fagrell, Chairman of the board 11:30 Zuragon, Joachim Fritzson, Founder 11:40 Annotell, TBA 11:50 Panel discussion: Opus, Diadrom, Zuragon, Annotell 12.10 -12.45 Lunch REDEYE AUTOTECH SEMINAR - 2019 2 THE REDEYE TECHNOLOGY TEAM Erik Kramming Client Manager & Head Of Technology Erik has a Master of Science in finance from Stockholm University. His previous work has included a position at Handelsbanken Capital Markets. At Redeye, Erik works with Corporate Broking for the Technology team. Greger Johansson Client Manager & Co-head Technology Greger has a background from the telecom industry, both from large companies as well as from entrepreneurial companies in Sweden (Telia and Ericsson) and USA (Metricom). He also spent 15+ years in investment banking (Nordea and Redeye). Furthermore, at Redeye Greger advise growth companies within the technology sector on financing, equity storytelling and getting the right shareholders/investors (Corporate Broking). Coder for two published C64-games. M.Sc.EE and M.Sc.Econ. Johan Ekström Client Manager Johan has a Master of Science in finance from the Stockholm School of Economics, and has studied e-com- merce and marketing at the MBA Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Myths and Misconceptions About the Behavior and Impact of MTBE Released from Petroleum Products
    Transactions on Ecology and the Environment vol 65, © 2003 WIT Press, www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 Common myths and misconceptions about the behavior and impact of MTBE released from petroleum products R. E. woodward' & R. L. sloan2 '~ievvaEnvironmental Services, Inc., Houston, TX 2 Lyondell Chemical Company, Channelview, TX Abstract Auto fuel regulatory-mandates, to decrease the aromatic content of fuels and to reduce exhaust emissions, have led to the expanded use of additives to oxygenate auto fuels in the European Union (EU) and United States (US). The economical ether oxygenates, methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) or ethyl tertiary butyl ether (ETBE) are frequently the oxygenate of choice because they deliver oxygen without increasing the Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) or altering the fungible characteristics of autofuel. However, transport of auto fuels by common carriers that also transport heating oil and other heavier petroleum products has lead to the discovery of trace concentrations of auto fuel in many petroleum products. Subsequent leaks and spills during storage and handling of petroleum products result in the release of Auto fuel constituents to the environment. Critical review of 12 myths and misconceptions about MTBE in auto fuels reveals the concepts were conceived to rationalize early field observations andlor incomplete data sets. Closer scrutiny, in light of recent laboratory investigations, field data, case studies and world literature, indicates the myths are unsubstantiated misconceptions and assumptions about the behavior of ether oxygenates in the environment. Commonly held myths focus on four general areas of fuel and fuel oxygenates management: storageldispensing, hydrology, remediation, and health effects. Storageldispensing misconceptions address materials stability to ethers in fuel and the environmental forensics of fuel systems failure.
    [Show full text]
  • Light-Duty Automotive Technology, Carbon Dioxide Emissions And
    Light-Duty Automotive Technology, Carbon Dioxide Emissions, and Fuel Economy Trends: 1975 Through 2014 Report EPA-420-R -14-023a October 2014 NOTICE: This technical report does not necessarily represent final EPA decisions or positions. It is intended to present technical analysis of issues using data that are currently available. The purpose in the release of such reports is to facilitate the exchange of technical information and to inform the public of technical developments. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 1 2. Fleetwide Trends Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Overview of Final MY 2013 Data ...................................................................................................................................... 3 B. Overview of Preliminary MY 2014 Data ........................................................................................................................... 3 C. Overview of Long-Term Trends ........................................................................................................................................ 6 3. Vehicle Class, Type, and Attributes .............................................................................................................................. 14 A. Vehicle Class ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]