Housing Guide 2020
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION
Chapter 5.1: Land Use, Zoning, and Public Policy A. INTRODUCTION This chapter describes existing land use, zoning, and public policies applicable to the proposed project and evaluates potential significant adverse effects that may result from implementation of the proposed flood protection system. Potential significant adverse effects to land use as a result of implementing the flood protection system are also evaluated. Potential land use issues include known or likely changes in current land uses within the study area, as well as the proposed project’s potential effect on existing and future land use patterns. Potential zoning and public policy issues include the compatibility of the proposed project with existing zoning and consistency with existing applicable public policies. PROJECT AREA ONE Project Area One extends from Montgomery Street on the south to the north end of John V. Lindsay East River Park (East River Park) at about East 13th Street. Project Area One consists primarily of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt East River Drive (FDR Drive) right-of-way, a portion of Pier 42 and Corlears Hook Park as well as East River Park. The majority of Project Area One is within East River Park and includes four existing pedestrian bridges across the FDR Drive to East River Park (Corlears Hook, Delancey Street, East 6th Street, and East 10th Street Bridges) and the East Houston Street overpass. Project Area One is located within Manhattan Community District 3, and borders portions of the Lower East Side and East Village neighborhoods. PROJECT AREA TWO Project Area Two extends north and east from Project Area One, from East 13th Street to East 25th Street. -
CB#6 197A Plan 197A Plan for the Eastern Section of Community District 6
CB#6 197a Plan 197a Plan For The Eastern Section of Community District 6 Borough of Manhattan New York City Prepared with the assistance of: Buckhurst Fish & Jacquemart CB#6: 14 Street on the south 59 Street on the north Lexington and Madison Avenues on the west East River on the east. 197a: 14 Street on the south 59 Street on the north Second Avenue plus 100 feet on the west East River on the east. 1 Dec 07 CB#6 197a Plan Community Board Six’s 197a plan has four themes: Orientation Land Use: This is a community CB#6: 14 Street on the south of residential neighborhoods 59 Street on the north cohabiting with institutional uses -- Lexington and Madison Avenues on the west hospitals and the United Nations. East River on the east. CD#6 is near the midtown central district but, except for a small area 197a: 14 Street on the south near Grand Central and along 59 Street on the north Second Avenue plus 100 Third Avenue, it is separate feet on the west Waterfront and Open Space: East River on the east. CD#6 is the community district United Nations. with the least open space per person in the city. The waterfront Tudor City. is a last opportunity. The goal is a continuous esplanade along the Former Con Ed Waterside. river and access at as many Kips Bay. streets as possible. NYU Medical Center. Urban Design and Preservation: The goal is investment that makes East River Science Park. the best use of the existing built fabric of the community and adds Bellevue Hospital. -
NEW FILINGS & DECISIONS | December 2018
CITYLAND NEW FILINGS & DECISIONS | December 2018 CITY PLANNING PIPELINE New Applications Filed with DCP — December 1 to December 31, 2018 APPLICANT PROJECT/ADDRESS DESCRIPTION ULURP NO. REPRESENTATIVE ZONING TEXT AND MAP AMENDMENTS NYC DCP East Harlem Follow-Up This is an application for a zoning map amendment and zoning C 190235 ZMM; N/A Actions text amendments as a follow-up to the East Harlem Neighborhood N 190236 ZRM Rezoning. These actions respond to the concerns raised during and after the public review process regarding building heights and pedestrian circulation. SPECIAL PERMITS/OTHER ACTIONS BOP Greenpoint Greenpoint Landing 5B-1 This is a private application to renew authorizations (ZR 11-42, 190231 CMK; Nicholas Williams D LLC Authorization Renewal ZR 11-43) pursuant to ZR Sections 62-822(a) and 62-822(b) in the 190232 CMK Greenpoint neighborhood of Brooklyn Community District 1. Redzep Kosic 99 Seacrest Avenue (DOS) Proposed construction in DOS area of property, which contains N 190041 RCR; Peter Calvanico CEHA. N 190042 RCR Pasquale Meleleo 135 Cromwell Circle - Pool Proposed in-ground pool. N 190206 ZAR Peter Calvanico Christian Miller 636 Howard Avenue – Renovate and enlarge an existing athletic facility at Wagner 190057 ZAR; Michael DeRuvo Athletic Facility College within HS. (R3-1) 190058 ZAR Marcy Hart LLC 633 Marcy Avenue FRESH This is a private application by Riverside Developers USA, Inc. 190174 ZCK; Frank St. Jacques (cert) requesting a FRESH certification per Zoning Resolution Section 63- 30 to facilitate an alteration of an eight-story, 45,479 square foot residential development to include an 8,619 square foot FRESH food store on the ground floor at 633 Marcy. -
The Decline of New York City Nightlife Culture Since the Late 1980S
1 Clubbed to Death: The Decline of New York City Nightlife Culture Since the Late 1980s Senior Thesis by Whitney Wei Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of BA Economic and Social History Barnard College of Columbia University New York, New York 2015 2 ii. Contents iii. Acknowledgement iv. Abstract v. List of Tables vi. List of Figures I. Introduction……………………………………………………………………7 II. The Limelight…………………………………………………………………12 III. After Dark…………………………………………………………………….21 a. AIDS Epidemic Strikes Clubland……………………..13 b. Gentrification: Early and Late………………………….27 c. The Impact of Gentrification to Industry Livelihood…32 IV. Clubbed to Death …………………………………………………………….35 a. 1989 Zoning Changes to Entertainment Venues…………………………36 b. Scandal, Vilification, and Disorder……………………………………….45 c. Rudy Giuliani and Criminalization of Nightlife………………………….53 V. Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………60 VI. Bibliography………………………………………………………………..…61 3 Acknowledgement I would like to take this opportunity to thank Professor Alan Dye for his wise guidance during this thesis process. Having such a supportive advisor has proven indispensable to the quality of this work. A special thank you to Ian Sinclair of NYC Planning for providing key zoning documents and patient explanations. Finally, I would like to thank the support and contributions of my peers in the Economic and Social History Senior Thesis class. 4 Abstract The purpose of this thesis is to investigate the impact of city policy changes and the processes of gentrification on 1980s nightlife subculture in New York City. What are important to this work are the contributions and influence of nightlife subculture to greater New York City history through fashion, music, and art. I intend to prove that, in combination with the city’s gradual revanchism of neighborhood properties, the self-destructive nature of this after-hours sector has led to its own demise. -
Chapter 9: Neighborhood Character
Chapter 9: Neighborhood Character A. INTRODUCTION As defined by the City Environmental Quality Review (CEQR) Technical Manual, neighborhood character is considered to be a combination of the many elements that creates each neighborhood’s distinct personality. These elements include land use, urban design, visual resources, historic resources, socioeconomics, traffic, and noise, as well as the other physical or social characteristics that help to describe the community. According to the CEQR Technical Manual, an assessment of neighborhood character is generally needed when the action would exceed preliminary thresholds in any one of the following areas of technical analysis: land use, urban design and visual resources, historic resources, socioeconomic conditions, transportation, or noise. An assessment is also appropriate when the action would have moderate effects on several of the aforementioned areas. Potential effects on neighborhood character may include: • Land Use. Development resulting from a proposed action could alter neighborhood character if it introduced new land uses, conflicts with land use policy or other public plans for the area, changes land use character, or generates significant land use impacts. • Socioeconomic Conditions. Changes in socioeconomic conditions have the potential to affect neighborhood character when they result in substantial direct or indirect displacement or addition of population, employment, or businesses; or substantial differences in population or employment density. • Historic Resources. When an action would result in substantial direct changes to a historic resource or substantial changes to public views of a resource, or when a historic resource analysis identified a significant impact in this category, there is a potential to affect neighborhood character. • Urban Design and Visual Resources. -
BOROUGH: Manhattan MAP ID# C4 COUNCIL
BOROUGH: Manhattan MAP ID# C4 COUNCIL DISTRICTS: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 COMMUNITY BOARDS: 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 NAME OF PLAN: Comprehensive Manhattan Waterfront Plan Community Organization: Manhattan Borough President’s Office Address: One Centre St., 19th Fl., New York, NY 10007 Contact Name: Jennifer Hoppa or Wilbert Woods, NYC DCP, Waterfront & Open Space Division Phone Number: 212-669-8300 / 212-720-3525 TYPE OF PLAN: Waterfront Revitalization and Access Plan GEOGRAPHIC AREA OF PLAN: Manhattan’s waterfront NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN/BACKGROUND: For more than 300 years, commerce and industry dominated Manhattan’s waterfront, helping make New York the nation’s largest, most economically important and most international city. The great heyday of New York as a port city has long since passed and one unfortunate result has been the shortsighted failure to capitalize on the waterfront’s enduring advantages and appeal. More than a dozen City, State and Federal agencies now control various parts of the waterfront. In some cases, several of these agencies have developed worthwhile plans for portions of the waterfront; however, these plans have not been made to fit into a larger vision for the borough. The multiplicity of agencies involved on the waterfront also produces a jurisdictional jumble that contributes to many of the waterfront’s current problems: its intermittent disrepair and decay; the unnecessary use of the prime waterfront locations for such eyesores as bus garages and parking lots; the granting of leases to private users that do not sufficiently protect public access to the waterfront; and, most tellingly, the lack of a coordinated effort to exploit the waterfront’s rich and varied potential. -
2020 Gala Program
2.22.20 CRISTO REY Benefitting Jim kim & scott Presenting Sponsors Childs kingsfield Serving communities. Changing lives. What matters to you matters to us. At EY, we’re proud to support Cristo Rey Jesuit High School. It’s one of the ways we’re helping to make our community a better place to work and live. A better and brighter future starts with all of us. Visit ey.com © 2020 Ernst & Young LLP. All Rights Reserved. EDNone Reserved. All Rights LLP. & Young © 2020 Ernst Welcome! Welcome to the second Rey of Hope Gala – a celebration of our most generous donors and our fearless leader, Bill Garrett. Tonight is also a celebration of the 525 students we have the honor to serve every day. These extraordinary young people make us proud as they travel the city to work in their corporate jobs, and as their remarkable achievements in the classroom. Their youth brings energy, creativity and a fresh perspective to our 132 corporate jobs partners. This year’s senior class will graduate in May, joining the 237 alumni who have gone before them, and 100% of them have been accepted into college. Our graduates attend some of the country’s most prestigious colleges, and this year we have our first student heading to an Ivy League college in the fall. It is humbling to think of how far this school has come in just six years. It is safe to say that all that has been accomplished would not have been possible without the leadership of Bill Garrett and the support of everyone here tonight. -
East Village/Lower East Side Manhattan the Historic Districts Council Is New York’S Citywide Advocate for Historic Buildings and Neighborhoods
A GUIDE TO HISTORIC NEW YORK CITY NEIGHBORHOODS EAST VILLAGE/LOWER EAST SIDE ManhaTTan The Historic Districts Council is New York’s citywide advocate for historic buildings and neighborhoods. The Six to Celebrate program annually identifies six historic New York City neighborhoods that merit preservation as priorities for HDC’s advocacy and consultation over a yearlong period. The six, chosen from applications submitted by community organizations, are selected on the basis of the architectural and historic merit of the area, the level of threat to the neighborhood, the strength and willingness of the local advocates, and the potential for HDC’s preservation support to be meaningful. HDC works with these neighborhood partners to set and reach pres- ervation goals through strategic planning, advocacy, outreach, programs and publicity. The core belief of the Historic Districts Council is that preservation and enhancement of New York City’s historic resources—its neighborhoods, buildings, parks and public spaces—are central to the continued success of the city. The Historic Districts Council works to ensure the preservation of these resources and uphold the New York City Landmarks Law and to further the preservation ethic. This mission is accomplished through ongoing programs of assistance to more than 500 community and neighborhood groups and through public-policy initiatives, publications, educational outreach and sponsorship of community events. Six to Celebrate is generously supported by The New York Community Trust. Additional support for Six to Celebrate is provided by the New York State Council on the Arts with the support of Governor Andrew Cuomo and the New York State Legislature and by public funds from the New York City Depart- ment of Cultural Affairs in partnership with the City Council and New York City Councilmembers Margaret Chin, Inez Dickens, Daniel Garodnick, Vincent Gentile, Sara Gonzalez, Stephen Levin and Rosie Mendez. -
723-14 M34 M34a Sbs M&S Layout 1
Bus Timetable Effective as of August 31, 2014 M34/ M34A Via 34 St M34 – between Javits Convention Center and Eastside Ferry Terminal M34A – between Waterside Plaza and Port Authority Bus Terminal If you think your bus operator deserves an Apple Award – our special recognition for service, courtesy and professionalism – call 511 and give us the badge or bus number. ¯˘¿ Fares – MetroCard® is accepted for all MTA New York City trains (including Staten Island Railway - SIR), and, local, Limited-Stop and +SelectBusService buses (at MetroCard fare collection machines). Express buses only accept 7-Day Express Bus Plus MetroCard or Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard. All of our buses and +SelectBusService Coin Fare Collector machines accept exact fare in coins. Dollar bills, pennies, and half-dollar coins are not accepted. Free Transfers – Unlimited Ride MetroCard permits free transfers to all but our express buses (between subway and local bus, local bus and local bus etc.) Pay-Per-Ride MetroCard allows one free transfer of equal or lesser value if you complete your transfer within two hours of the time you pay your full fare with the same MetroCard. If you pay your local bus fare with coins, ask for a free electronic paper transfer to use on another local bus. Reduced-Fare Benefits – You are eligible for reduced-fare benefits if you are at least 65 years of age or have a qualifying disability. Benefits are available (except on peak-hour express buses) with proper identification, including Reduced-Fare MetroCard or Medicare card (Medicaid cards do not qualify). Children – The subway, SIR, local, Limited-Stop, and +SelectBusService buses permit up to three children, 44 inches tall and under to ride free when accompanied by an adult paying full fare. -
Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America
Summary of Sexual Abuse Claims in Chapter 11 Cases of Boy Scouts of America There are approximately 101,135sexual abuse claims filed. Of those claims, the Tort Claimants’ Committee estimates that there are approximately 83,807 unique claims if the amended and superseded and multiple claims filed on account of the same survivor are removed. The summary of sexual abuse claims below uses the set of 83,807 of claim for purposes of claims summary below.1 The Tort Claimants’ Committee has broken down the sexual abuse claims in various categories for the purpose of disclosing where and when the sexual abuse claims arose and the identity of certain of the parties that are implicated in the alleged sexual abuse. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a chart that shows the sexual abuse claims broken down by the year in which they first arose. Please note that there approximately 10,500 claims did not provide a date for when the sexual abuse occurred. As a result, those claims have not been assigned a year in which the abuse first arose. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the state or jurisdiction in which they arose. Please note there are approximately 7,186 claims that did not provide a location of abuse. Those claims are reflected by YY or ZZ in the codes used to identify the applicable state or jurisdiction. Those claims have not been assigned a state or other jurisdiction. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a chart that shows the claims broken down by the Local Council implicated in the sexual abuse. -
Phil Thornton Interview with Tim Lawrence
Phil Thornton interview with Tim Lawrence, “Love is the Message”, Swine, July 2005 In the last issue of Swine we reviewed Tim Lawrence’s superb history of disco, Love Saves The Day. Tim kindly agreed to answer some of our questions and we will hopefully be getting him up to the north west to talk about ‘Love Saves The Day’ and his other projects; he’s currently writing the eighties follow-up to LSD and a biography of Arthur Russell as well as leading the BA Music Culture: Theory & Production at University of East London. Tim has also written liner notes for the likes of David Mancuso, Marshall Jefferson and Masters at Work LPs and helps co-ordinate the London Loft parties. He’s also just had his second kid. In short he’s a very busy fellar, so we’d like to extend our porcine thanks to him and wish him all the best with his future projects. Swine: Disco has been a much maligned and misunderstood musical genre, what gave you the impetus to write LSD? Tim Lawrence: The initial plan was to write a book that focused on the late eighties and nineties. Then I was introduced to David Mancuso who nobody had really heard of at the time and he introduced me to this whole world of underground parties that I’d never heard of. Initially I was reluctant to get into the 1970s. Like so many early UK house heads, I just equated disco with cheese, but the more I found out about the downtown scene of the 1970s, the more I realised this was where nucleus of contemporary dance culture was formed. -
Big Business, Real Estate Determinism, and Dance Culture in New York, 1980–88
Journal of Popular Music Studies, Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 288–306 Big Business, Real Estate Determinism, and Dance Culture in New York, 1980–88 Tim Lawrence University of East London Despite the late 1970s national backlash against disco, dance culture flourished in New York during the first years of the 1980s, but entered a period of relative decline across the second half of the decade when a slew of influential parties closed. Critics attribute the slump to the spread of AIDS, and understandably so, for the epidemic devastated the city’s dance scene in a way that began with yet could never be reduced to numbers of lost bodies (Brewster and Broughton, Buckland, Cheren, Easlea, Echols, Shapiro). At the same time, however, the introduction of a slew of neoliberal policies—including welfare cuts, the liberalization of the financial sector, and pro-developer policies—contributed to the rapid rise of the stock market and the real estate market, and in so doing presaged the systematic demise of dance culture in the city. In this article, I aim to explore how landlords who rented their properties to party promoters across the 1970s and early 1980s went on to strike more handsome deals with property developers and boutique merchants during the remainder of the decade, and in so doing forged a form of “real estate determinism” that turned New York City into an inhospitable terrain for parties and clubs.1 While I am sympathetic to David Harvey’s and Sharon Zukin’s critique of the impact of neoliberalism on global cities such as New York, I disagree with their contention that far from offering an oppositional alternative to neoliberalism, cultural workers colluded straightforwardly with the broad terms of that project, as will become clear.