Time to Remove Religion from the Oath David M. Tanovich* R. V. J

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Time to Remove Religion from the Oath David M. Tanovich* R. V. J J. (T.R.) : Time To Remove Religion From the Oath 211 J. (T.R.): Time To Remove Religion From the Oath David M. Tanovich* R. v. J. (T.R.)1 once again raises the question of whether any inferences can be drawn from how a witness satisfies the moral competency re- quirement to testify and whether it is time to remove religion from the oath. Although there is very little discussion as to what happened at trial in the Court of Appeal’s short endorsement in J. (T.R.), it would appear that the Crown cross-examined the accused on his decision to affirm rather than swear an oath and that there was some evidence that he was a religious person.2 The Crown then invited the judge to reason that “for a religious individual to affirm instead of swearing on the Bible leads to an infer- ence that he was not telling the truth.”3 Based on that cross-examination and Crown’s submissions, the trial judge held: “I do not view the ac- cused’s choice to affirm as raising a significant concern respecting his credibility . However it is a factor to be considered in assessing his evidence.”4 The Court of Appeal held that this was an error. With little analysis, Jus- tice Hall simply noted that section 14(2) of the Canada Evidence Act states that evidence under an affirmation has “the same effect as if taken under oath.” He did, however, observe that “there may be factual circum- stances where it could be appropriate for a judge to permit some explora- tion of the issue of the degree to which an oath or affirmation may bind the conscience of a witness . .”5 *Faculty of Law, University of Windsor. 12013 BCCA 449 (B.C. C.A.), reported above at p. 207 [J. (T.R.)]. 2Ibid. at para. 4. 3Ibid. at para. 5. 4Ibid. at para. 6 (emphasis added). 5Ibid. at para. 4. 212 CRIMINAL REPORTS 6 C.R. (7th) The issue of adverse inferences has arisen in a number of other cases. In R. v. Wiebe,6 an active member of a congregation chose to affirm rather than swear an oath. Perhaps not surprisingly, during his examination-in- chief, the jury asked the judge what the difference was between the oath and affirmation. The judge instructed the jury that there was no differ- ence and that both could be used in giving evidence. In R. v. K. (A.H.)7 and R. v. Bell,8 adverse inferences were drawn against a Muslim accused and central Crown witness respectively who swore an oath on the Bible instead of the Koran. In K. (A.H.), the accused described himself as a devote Muslim and, in Bell, the witness had sworn on the Koran in his videotaped statement to the police. Finally, in R. v. Daud,9 the defence unsuccessfully tried to argue that the Crown witnesses should not be be- lieved, in part, because they chose to affirm rather than swear on the Koran. This is an area fraught with difficulties. As these cases demonstrate, there does appear to be a natural tendency to want to make assumptions, often negative, about why individuals choose how they commit to telling the truth. It is dangerous, however, to expressly permit adverse infer- ences to be drawn against the credibility of witnesses based on what method they choose to give evidence (as was the case in K. (A.H.) and Bell). Similarly, by requiring a witness to declare whether they want to swear an oath or affirm, we leave it open (notwithstanding section 14(2)), for jurors to consciously or unconsciously draw negative infer- ences from a witness who chooses to affirm. There may be any number of reasons why a person may choose to affirm instead of choosing to swear an oath to God.10 For example, the witness may be unfamiliar with the difference between the two methods or may not even understand what affirm means. In addition, different religions may have different views about the oath and about swearing to God in a public place like the courtroom. 6(2006), 205 C.C.C. (3d) 326 (Ont. C.A.). 72011 ONSC 5510 (Ont. S.C.J.) at paras. 27-28 [K. (A.H.)]. 82011 ONSC 1218 (Ont. S.C.J.) at para. 57 [Bell]. 92007 BCPC 68 (B.C. Prov. Ct.). 10And, of course, some witnesses no longer have a choice. Witnesses under the age of 14 can only testify on a promise to tell the truth (see s. 16.1(6) of the Canada Evidence Act). J. (T.R.) : Time To Remove Religion From the Oath 213 Similarly, a Muslim witness may choose to swear on the Bible instead of the Koran because the witness may not want it known that he or she is Muslim because of a concern about stereotyping. Or, they may believe that the Bible is simply a universal courtroom symbol of the oath to God or that it is the standard practice. Alternatively, the witness may be una- ware of the availability of another religious book or practice that could be used. More fundamentally, assumptions about religions may simply be uninformed. So, for example, according to Islamic teaching, Jesus is a Prophet of God. Therefore, some Muslim witnesses may feel their con- science religiously bound by swearing an oath on the Bible.11 There is also the opposite danger that too much weight will be placed on evidence because it is taken under oath. For example, in R. v. Ali,12 the trial judge accepted the evidence of the complainant in large part because she “was one of the most intelligent, sincere and believable witnesses that has ever testified before me. Clutching her copy of the Koran she swore to tell the truth. That oath bound her conscience in a way that came out in Court loud and clear.”13 The role of religion in criminal trials was at issue in the recent Supreme Court decision in R. v. S. (N.)14 concerning whether a Muslim woman should be able to wear her niqab while testifying. In that case, Justice LeBel (Rothstein J. concurring) was essentially of the view that religion had no place in a secular courtroom. The majority rejected that position and pointed to the oath ceremony as an example of respecting religious traditions in our courts.15 Nevertheless, S. (N.) did recognize that re- specting religious traditions has its limits and that there would be a justi- fication for a limit where trial fairness or undue disruption was in issue. In my view, given the concerns identified above, trial fairness supports abolishing the religious oath. Doing so would also render moot the need for a secular affirmation thereby removing any need for the witness to choose between the oath or affirmation. At the end of the day, the only meaningful control a court has over whether the oath or affirmation is 11I am indebted to Professor Lisa Dufraimont for this latter point. 122012 SKPC 62 (Sask. Prov. Ct.). 13Ibid. at para. 8. 142012 SCC 72, 98 C.R. (6th) 1 (S.C.C.) [S. (N.)]. 15Ibid. at para. 53. 214 CRIMINAL REPORTS 6 C.R. (7th) respected is a charge of perjury and the possibility of imprisonment. Therefore, the oath ceremony should focus on it being a criminal offence to lie rather than an offence to God or some other higher or spiritual being. Some years ago, Justice Peter Nasmith created a secular oath ceremony in which witnesses were asked the following questions: Do you know that it is a criminal offence to intentionally give false evidence in a judicial proceeding? Do you solemnly promise to tell the truth in this proceeding? If they answered “yes” to both, they were considered to be under oath.16 This is a reasonable approach. There does not appear to be any impedi- ment to judges adopting this or a similar secular oath ceremony in their courtrooms. Section 13 of the Canada Evidence Act does not prescribe any particular form of the oath. And, in R. v. Fletcher,17 it was recog- nized that as society has changed over the years the oath for many has lost its spiritual and religious significance. Those adults to whom the sanc- tity of the oath has lost its religious meaning, none the less have a sense of moral obligation to tell the truth on taking the oath and feel their conscience bound by it. That is the nature of the oath for many adult witnesses today.18 16See Peter Nasmith, “High Time for One Secular Oath” (1990) L Soc Gaz 230. 17(1982), 1 C.C.C. (3d) 370 (Ont. C.A.). 18Ibid. at 377..
Recommended publications
  • Reflections on the Religionless Society: the Case of Albania
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 16 Issue 4 Article 1 8-1996 Reflections on the Religionless Society: The Case of Albania Denis R. Janz Loyola University, New Orleans, Louisiana Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Janz, Denis R. (1996) "Reflections on the Religionless Society: The Case of Albania," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 16 : Iss. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol16/iss4/1 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REFLECTIONS ON THE RELIGIONLESS SOCIETY: THE CASE OF ALBANIA By Denis R. Janz Denis R. Janz is professor of religious studies at Loyola University, New Orleans, · Louisiana. From the time of its inception as a discipline, the scientific study of religion has raised the question of the universality of religion. Are human beings somehow naturally religious? Has there ever been a truly religionless society? Is modernity itself inimical to religion, leading slowly but nevertheless inexorably to its extinction? Or does a fundamental human religiosity survive and mutate into ever new forms, as it adapts itself to the exigencies of the age? There are as of yet no clear answers to these questions. And religiologists continue to search for the irreligious society, or at least for the society in which religion is utterly devoid of any social significance, where the religious sector is a tiny minority made up largely of elderly people and assorted marginal figures.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Time, Honor, and Memory: Oral Law in Albania
    Oral Tradition, 23/1 (2008): 3-14 Of Time, Honor, and Memory: Oral Law in Albania Fatos Tarifa This essay provides a historical account of the role of oral tradition in passing on from generation to generation an ancient code of customary law that has shaped and dominated the lives of northern Albanians until well into the mid-twentieth century. This traditional body of customary law is known as the Kode of Lekë Dukagjini. It represents a series of norms, mores, and injunctions that were passed down by word of mouth for generations and reputedly originally formulated by Lekë Dukagjini, an Albanian prince and companion-in-arms to Albania’s national hero, George Kastriot Skanderbeg (1405-68). Lekë Dukagjini ruled the territories of Pulati, Puka, Mirdita, Lura, and Luma in northern Albania—known today as the region of Dukagjini—until the Ottoman armies seized Albania’s northernmost city of Shkodër in 1479. Throughout the past five to six centuries this corpus of customary law has been referred to as Kanuni i Lekë Dukagjinit, Kanuni i Malsisë (the Code of the Highlands), or Kanuni i maleve (the Code of the Mountains). The “Code” is an inexact term, since Kanun, deriving from the Greek kanon, simultaneously signifies “norm,” “rule,” and “measure.” The Kanun, but most particularly the norm of vengeance, or blood taking, as its standard punitive apparatus, continue to this day to be a subject of historical, sociological, anthropological, and juridical interest involving various theoretical frames of reference from the dominant trends of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries to today. The Kanun of Lekë Dukagjini was not the only customary law in Albania.
    [Show full text]
  • Albanian Families' History and Heritage Making at the Crossroads of New
    Voicing the stories of the excluded: Albanian families’ history and heritage making at the crossroads of new and old homes Eleni Vomvyla UCL Institute of Archaeology Thesis submitted for the award of Doctor in Philosophy in Cultural Heritage 2013 Declaration of originality I, Eleni Vomvyla confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signature 2 To the five Albanian families for opening their homes and sharing their stories with me. 3 Abstract My research explores the dialectical relationship between identity and the conceptualisation/creation of history and heritage in migration by studying a socially excluded group in Greece, that of Albanian families. Even though the Albanian community has more than twenty years of presence in the country, its stories, often invested with otherness, remain hidden in the Greek ‘mono-cultural’ landscape. In opposition to these stigmatising discourses, my study draws on movements democratising the past and calling for engagements from below by endorsing the socially constructed nature of identity and the denationalisation of memory. A nine-month fieldwork with five Albanian families took place in their domestic and neighbourhood settings in the areas of Athens and Piraeus. Based on critical ethnography, data collection was derived from participant observation, conversational interviews and participatory techniques. From an individual and family group point of view the notion of habitus led to diverse conceptions of ethnic identity, taking transnational dimensions in families’ literal and metaphorical back- and-forth movements between Greece and Albania.
    [Show full text]
  • Brimming with Worship
    ebrews 12:28 - Brimming With Worship {7~ ~ 11f~ ~&ddtM ta~ April 8-10, 2005 - Richmond, Indiana at the Richmond Church of the Brethren ~ ~ ~ ~,Ze 4~4- b For pastors, church musicians, artists, ministers, laypersons . .. ANYONE who is interested in Sally Morgenthaler enhancing the worship experiences (1~£~,,te of their congregation! Founder of Sacramentis.com ("Re-imagining Worship for a New Millennium)" Morgenthaler's Conference Sponsors vision is to move worship beyond presentation (information, performed music, preaching) to an .R,u=tl~ 11!--&IU',,,ud ~S,a,0 interactive, sacred experience involving all the arts. The Rosenberger Memorial Recital Series at Bethany Theological Seminary was established by the family of James Abbington Lester Markley Rosenberger and Pauline Howe ;eAl&Z,~ Cndt?Atl/m-&nT ~~,,te Rosenberger to sponsor recitals and workshops featuring noted musicians. Professor of music in the Department of Fine Arts at Morgan State University, Baltimore, and Execu­ ~;1'2A.h# 9. ~,,74.,,M.,p,A & .-/4,,u;.,m,MJ tive Editor of the African American Church Music /&A :;?:u;-d .,pfi_,d J,,b /4_,t, Series published by GIA Publications, Inc., Chicago. The family of Stephen I. Katonah created this memorial fund at Bethany Theological Seminary for faith and the arts to reveal spiritual truths of Nadine Pence Frantz justice and faith in contemporary life as depicted through various mediums of art. ~t&~ C!u/4,,u;~ £~,,te Professor of Theological Studies at Bethany 6eJA.4A-;fl /Zi.,e,&/4#4:e.,p/ SeA?dfl.4A-;jl Theological Seminary, and currently developing two projects relating to worship and visual art: a Celebrating one hundred years of preparing people for Christian ministry and educating those called as set of reflections around images of Jesus as the witnesses to the Gospel of Jesus Christ in the cities Christ, and a book using visual art to engage with and communities of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • State Oath of Allegiance
    University of California Hastings College of the Law | 200 McAllister Street | San Francisco, CA 94102 STATE OATH OF ALLEGIANCE I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties upon which I am about to enter. Date Printed Name Signature of Authorized Official Signature of Employee Department Title WHO MUST SIGN THE OATH: All persons WHERE OATHS ARE FILED: The Oaths of (other than aliens) employed by UC Hastings all employees of UC Hastings College of the College of the Law, in common with all other Law shall be filed with Human Resources. California public employees, whether with or without compensation, must sign the Oath, FAILURE TO SIGN THE OATH: No (Calif. Constitution, Article XX, Section 2, compensation for services performed prior to Calif. Government Codes, Sections his/her subscribing to the Oath or affirmation 3 100-3 102). may be paid to a College employee, and no reimbursement for expenses incurred may be All persons re-employed by UC Hastings made prior to his/her subscribing to the Oath College of the Law after a termination of or affirmation. service must sign a new Oath if the date of re- employment is more than one year after the date PENALTIES: "Every person who, while taking on which the previous Oath was signed.
    [Show full text]
  • 30 July 2002 Ms Merrin Mason Executive Officer Victorian
    30 July 2002 Ms Merrin Mason Executive Officer Victorian Parliament Law Reform Commission Level 8, 35 Spring St. MELBOURNE 3004 Inquiry into Oaths and Affirmations with Reference to the Multicultural Community Dear Ms Mason I refer to your letter of 14 June 2002 inviting the Islamic Council of Victoria to make a submission to the Committee’s inquiry on the above subject. Our submission is attached. I also confirm that Mr Goolam Laher and I shall attend the Committee’s public hearing on Thursday 1 August at 2 p.m. Yours sincerely (Philip Knight) Executive Officer Inquiry by Victorian Parliament Law Reform Commission into Oaths and Affirmations with Reference to the Multicultural Community Submission by the Islamic Council of Victoria 1 August 2002 The Islamic Council of Victoria welcomes the initiative of the Legislative Assembly in initiating an inquiry into the system of oaths and oath taking and making of statutory declarations and affidavits, as these matters affect the multicultural community. On the question of the rules for swearing under the Evidence Act the Council would favour the removal of swearing on The Bible as the primary form of oath and its replacement by provision for the swearing of an appropriate religious oath binding on the person’s conscience. Such a provision would reflect the reality of multifaith, multicultural Australia and remove any perception that the Act and the administration of justice favoured one religion or culture over another. We believe it self evident that swearing on The Bible should no longer enjoy any formal status as the principal form of oath taking in our society.
    [Show full text]
  • Vowing Away the Fifth Commandment: Matthew 15:3-6//Mark 7:9-13
    Restoration Quarterly 42 (2000) 193-209. Copyright © 2000 by Restoration Quarterly, cited with permission. VOWING AWAY THE FIFTH COMMANDMENT: MATTHEW 15:3-6//MARK 7:9-13 JON NELSON BAILEY Dallas, TX I. Introduction Religious vows are prominent in ancient Judaism. This study examines the evidence that in the first-century CE a son could make a vow that would keep him from honoring his parents as commanded in the fifth of the Ten Commandments (Exod 20:12; Deut 5:16). This practice, mentioned in Matt 15:3-6//Mark 7:9-13, had the effect of vowing away the fifth commandment. The practice may have been rare and controversial, but it was a phenomenon that could occur in ancient Judaism. Since God required that vows be kept, problems arose when a vow was made that violated the Torah. In this study, I trace the development of such vows within Judaism and show that the NT bears witness to the practice by which a person could make a vow that superseded requirements of the fifth command- ment. I also show that such vows encountered opposition by the rabbis and eventually became unthinkable for pious Jews by the time of the Babylonian Talmud. II. Significant Terms A vow is a promise made in a religious context, usually to God. Vows tend to be promises to perform, or to abstain from, specific actions. In biblical and rabbinic Hebrew, the most common terms for "vow" are the verb rdanA and the 1 noun rd,n,. The corresponding Aramaic terms are the verb rdan; and the noun rdan;.
    [Show full text]
  • Islam: the Qur'an, Oath of Office and the U.S. Congress
    Islam: The Qur’an, Oath of Office and the U.S. Congress February 5, 2007 "You can't back down, you can't chicken out, you can't be afraid, you got to have faith in Allah, and you got to stand up and be a real Muslim," Detroit native Keith Ellison said to loud applause. "Allahu akbar" — God is great - was the reply of many in the crowd.1 Background Recently, a flurry of news articles appeared alleging the right of newly-elected Keith Ellison, who is the first Muslim to be elected to United States Congress, to take the oath of office with his hand upon Thomas Jefferson’s Qur’an.2 It is ironic that President Jefferson’s Qur’an was used, considering he sent the US Navy to war against the Muslims of the Barbary Coast.3 Congressman Virgil H Goode Jr. warned there will be more Muslims elected to national office if immigration from Muslim countries were not restricted.4 As a result of his comments, many newspaper editors launched into verbal tirades condemning his statement as bigoted, Islamophobic, anti-religious, and unconstitutional.5 An Indisputable Fact The New York Times and Washington Post did not take exception to the truth of Virgil H. Goode’s statement. It is an indisputable fact that further immigration from Muslim countries will increase the likelihood that more Muslims will be elected to the U.S. Congress who will use the Qur’an in their unofficial swearing-in ceremonies. We need only to look to Europe for an example of nations that have traveled a long way down the immigration pathway.
    [Show full text]
  • Deut 27 and Ancient Media: the Torah Stones and the Meaning of Covenant Melissa Ramos – UCLA (Society of Biblical Literature: San Antonio, 2016)
    Digital Commons @ George Fox University Faculty Publications - College of Christian Studies College of Christian Studies 2016 Deut 27 and Ancient Media: The orT ah Stones and the Meaning of Covenant Melissa Ramos George Fox University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ccs Part of the Biblical Studies Commons, and the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Ramos, Melissa, "Deut 27 and Ancient Media: The orT ah Stones and the Meaning of Covenant" (2016). Faculty Publications - College of Christian Studies. 259. http://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ccs/259 This Conference Proceeding is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Christian Studies at Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications - College of Christian Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Deut 27 and Ancient Media: The Torah Stones and the Meaning of Covenant Melissa Ramos – UCLA (Society of Biblical Literature: San Antonio, 2016) Introduction The tablets of the covenant are one of the most enduring symbols of the Hebrew Bible. In Deuteronomy 27 the command is given to inscribe on stones “all the words of These stones are potent visual symbols .וכתבת על–האבנים את–כל–התורה הזאת :”the this torah in the Hebrew Bible, symbols of the enduring nature of the binding oath of the covenant made between God and the people. This paper will explore this connection between the ratification of covenant and the crafting of an iconic representation of the covenant on visual media.
    [Show full text]
  • 201 African Traditional Religion Oath Taking and Resource Management
    International Journal of Religion & Human Relations, Volume 12 No. 1, 2020 African Traditional Religion Oath Taking and Resource Management in Nigeria Aniekan Etim Nana Abstract This paper critically assesses African Traditional Religion Oath Taking and resource control and management in Nigeria. An oath is taken to ensure that the parties of an agreement fulfil their assigned roles. In traditional oath taking, deities and ancestors are called to be witnesses to the agreement. The oath is a fearful ritual, and during rituals; words connoting calamity and death are used to make a pledge, stating that a person will keep to one’s part of agreement. The aim of this paper is for the government to introduce traditional oath taking into the mainstream of the system to act as a watch dog or check and balances so that those who are keen in corrupt practices of our resources will pay for it. This work adopts a phenomenological approach. In Nigeria today our resources are in the hands of few elites. These corrupt elites have brought untold hardship to the people of the Niger Delta whereby most of our communities are lacking behind in development. As a result of lack of trust on the part of the elites and some of our wealthy citizens, the introduction of traditional oath taking by the chiefs and other traditional practitioners will help to forestall the deviation of our rich resources. This paper recommends that the government should introduce the system of traditional oath taking so that our elites and some of our elders in our respective communities will respect our God given resources and play the game in the manner that will bring lasting development to our respective communities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Israeli Druze: Neither Here Nor There
    University of Mississippi eGrove Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors Theses Honors College) 2018 The Israeli Druze: Neither Here nor There Sydney Green University of Mississippi. Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College Follow this and additional works at: https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Green, Sydney, "The Israeli Druze: Neither Here nor There" (2018). Honors Theses. 885. https://egrove.olemiss.edu/hon_thesis/885 This Undergraduate Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College (Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College) at eGrove. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of eGrove. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ISRAELI DRUZE: “NEITHER HERE NOR THERE” © 2018 By Sydney Elizabeth Green A thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for completion Of the Bachelor of Arts degree in International Studies Croft Institute for International Studies Sally McDonnell Barksdale Honors College The University of Mississippi University, Mississippi May 2011 Approved: _________________________________ Advisor: Dr. Vivian Ibrahim _________________________________ Reader: Dr.Yael Zeira _________________________________ Reader: Dr. Luca D’Anna !1 ABSTRACT SYDNEY ELIZABETH GREEN The Israeli Druze: “Neither Here Nor There” (Under the direction of Dr. Vivian Ibrahim) Druze scholar Rabah Halabi describes the Druze standing in Israel as “neither here nor there.” This thesis asks the question: How do the Druze fit into a society created to house and defend the Jewish people? To answer this question, Druze identity is examined from the Jewish-Israeli and Arab-Israeli perspectives regarding the Druze community based on their service in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) through a case study of media reactions to the July 2017 fatal shooting of two on-duty Druze policemen by three Arab-Israeli shooters at Islamic holy site al-Aqsa Mosque in the Old City in Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Oaths and Giving Thanks: Ritual and Religion in Revolutionary America Tara E
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations 1-1-2013 Taking Oaths and Giving Thanks: Ritual and Religion In Revolutionary America Tara E. Strauch University of South Carolina Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Strauch, T. E.(2013). Taking Oaths and Giving Thanks: Ritual and Religion In Revolutionary America. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/1481 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Taking Oaths and Giving Thanks: Ritual and Religion in Revolutionary America by Tara Thompson Strauch Master of Arts University of South Carolina, 2010 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2013 Accepted by: Dr. Daniel Littlefield, Major Professor Dr. Kathryn Edwards, Committee Member Dr. Lacy Ford, Committee Member Dr. David Shields, Committee Member Lacy Ford, Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies © Copyright by Tara Strauch, 2013 All Rights Reserved. ii Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dan Littlefield for his guidance, encouragement, and willingness to let my mind roam and Kay Edwards for bringing me back to reality. Lacy Ford, David Shields, Leon Jackson, Don Doyle, Carol Harrison, and Christine Ames all provided valuable insights and additions to this work. The archivists and staffs at the Massachusetts Historical Society, Historical Society of Pennsylvania, Library Company of Philadelphia, South Carolina Historical Society, University of South Carolina’s Caroliniana Library and The Wilson Library at the University of North Carolina were immensely helpful.
    [Show full text]