DOCSLIB.ORG

Crimes Against Persons/Death Investigations Version 5.9

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crimes Against Persons/Death Investigations Version 5.9 CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING Basic Course Workbook Series Student Materials Learning Domain 7 Crimes Against Persons/Death Investigations Version 5.9 THE MISSION OF THE CALIFORNIA COMMISSION ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING IS TO CONTINUALLY ENHANCE THE PROFESSIONALISM OF CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT IN SERVING ITS COMMUNITIES Basic Course Workbook Series Student Materials Learning Domain 7 Crimes Against Persons/Death Investigations Version 5.9 © Copyright 2007 California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) All rights reserved. Published 1998 Revised June 2001 Corrected October 2005 Revised January 2006 Revised July 2007 Correction November 2015 Correction April 2019 This publication may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical or by any information storage and retrieval system now known or hereafter invented, without prior written permission of the California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training, with the following exception: California law enforcement or dispatch agencies in the POST program, POST-certified training presenters, and presenters and students of the California basic course instructional system are allowed to copy this publication for non-commercial use. All other individuals, private businesses and corporations, public and private agencies and colleges, professional associations, and non-POST law enforcement agencies in state or out-of- state may purchase copies of this publication, at cost, from POST as listed below: From POST’s Web Site: www.post.ca.gov Go to Ordering Student Workbooks COMMISSION ON PEACE OFFICER STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSIONERS Joyce Dudley – Chair District Attorney Santa Barbara County Rick Braziel – Vice Chair Educator Humboldt State University Alan Barcelona Special Agent California Department of Justice Lai Lai Bui Sergeant Sacramento Police Department Thomas Chaplin Chief Walnut Creek Police Department Barry Donelan Sergeant Oakland Police Department Robert Doyle Sheriff Marin County Geoff Long Public Member John McMahon Sheriff San Bernardino County Jethroe Moore, II Public Member James O’Rourke Officer California Highway Patrol Batine Ramirez Sergeant Placer County Sheriff’s Department Laurie Smith Sheriff Santa Clara County Walter Vasquez Chief La Mesa Police Department Kevin Gardner Chief Representing Xavier Beccera Director of Division of Law Enforcement Attorney General Ex-Officio Member THE ACADEMY TRAINING MISSION The primary mission of basic training is to prepare students mentally, morally, and physically to advance into a field training program, assume the responsibilities, and execute the duties of a peace officer in society. FOREWORD The California Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training sincerely appreciates the efforts of the many curriculum consultants, academy instructors, directors and coordinators who contributed to the development of this workbook. We must also thank the California law enforcement agency executives who allowed their personnel to participate in the development of these training materials. This student workbook is part of the POST Basic Course Training System. The workbook component of this system provides a self-study document for every learning domain in the Basic Course. Each workbook is intended to be a supplement to, not a substitute for, classroom instruction. The objective of the system is to improve academy student learning and information retention and ultimately contribute to you becoming a peace officer committed to safety, and to the communities you will serve. The content of each workbook is organized into sequenced learning modules to meet requirements as prescribed both by California law and the POST Training and Testing Specifications for the Basic Course. It is our hope that the collective wisdom and experience of all who contributed to this workbook will help you, the student, to successfully complete the Basic Course and to enjoy a safe and rewarding career as a peace officer. MANUEL ALVAREZ, Jr. Executive Director LD 7: Crimes Against Persons/Death Investigations Table of Contents Topic See Page Preface iii Introduction iii How to Use the Student Workbook iv Chapter 1: Identifying and Classifying Crimes Related 1-1 to Injury Overview 1-1 Crimes Against Persons 1-3 Report Writing Tip 1-4 Battery 1-6 Assault with a Deadly Weapon or by Means of Force 1-10 Elder or Dependent Adult Abuse 1-13 Chapter Synopsis 1-17 Workbook Learning Activities 1-18 Chapter 2: Identifying and Classifying Crimes Related 2-1 to Kidnapping Overview 2-1 Kidnapping 2-3 False Imprisonment 2-6 Child Abduction without Custodial Right 2-8 Child Abduction with Custodial Right 2-11 Chapter Synopsis 2-13 Workbook Learning Activities 2-14 Continued on next page LD 7: Crimes Against Persons/Death Investigations i Table of Contents, Continued Topic See Page Chapter 3: Identifying and Classifying Crimes 3-1 Related to Robbery Overview 3-1 Robbery 3-2 Carjacking 3-6 Chapter Synopsis 3-8 Workbook Learning Activities 3-9 Chapter 4: Identifying and Classifying Crimes 4-1 Related to Homicide Overview 4-1 Murder 4-2 Manslaughter 4-5 Chapter Synopsis 4-9 Workbook Learning Activities 4-10 Chapter 5: Death Investigations 5-1 Overview 5-1 Death Investigations 5-3 Homicide Investigations 5-16 Suicide Investigations 5-19 Deaths Involving Poison 5-23 Deaths Involving Children 5-24 Chapter Synopsis 5-36 Workbook Learning Activities 5-37 Glossary G-1 ii LD 7: Crimes Against Persons/Death Investigations How to Use the Student Workbook Introduction This workbook provides an introduction to the training requirements for this Learning Domain. It is intended to be used in several ways: for initial learning prior to classroom attendance, for test preparation, and for remedial training. Workbook To use the workbook most effectively, follow the steps listed below. format Step Action 1 Read the first two sections: Preface and How to Use the Workbook, which provide an overview of how the workbook fits into the POST Instructional System and how it should be used. 2 Refer to the overview section at the start of each chapter to review the learning objectives. 3 Read the text. 4 Refer to the Chapter Synopsis section at the end of each chapter to review the key points that support the chapter objectives. 5 Complete the Workbook Learning Activities at the end of each chapter. These activities reinforce the material taught in the chapter. 6 Refer to the Glossary section for a definition of important terms. The terms appear throughout the text and are bolded and underlined the first time they appear (e.g., term). LD 19: Vehicle Operations iii Preface Introduction Student The student workbooks are part of the POST Basic Course Instructional workbooks System. This system is designed to provide students with a self-study document to be used in preparation for classroom training. Regular Basic Completion of the Regular Basic Course is required, prior to exercising peace Course officer powers, as recognized in the California Penal Code and where the training POST-required standard is the POST Regular Basic Course. requirement Student The following elements are included in each workbook: workbook elements • chapter contents, including a synopsis of key points • supplementary material • a glossary of terms used in this workbook iv LD 7: Crimes Against Persons/Death Investigations Chapter 1 Identifying and Classifying Crimes Related to Injury Overview Learning need Arrest and successful prosecution depends on the development of probable cause. Peace officers need to know the elements required to arrest for crimes related to injury, and to correctly categorize these crimes as misdemeanors or felonies. Learning The chart below identifies the student learning objectives for this chapter. objectives After completing study of this chapter, the student will Objective ID be able to: • recognize the crime elements required to arrest for: - battery 7.01.2 - assault with a deadly weapon or by means of force 7.01.3 - elder or dependent adult abuse 7.01.6 • recognize the crime classification as a misdemeanor or 7.01.7 felony Continued on next page LD 7: Chapter 1 – Identifying and Classifying Crimes Related to Injury 1-1 Overview, Continue In this chapter This chapter focuses on recalling, classifying, and categorizing crimes related to injury. Refer to the following chart for specific topics. Topic See Page Crimes Against Persons 1-3 Report Writing Tip 1-4 Battery 1-6 Assault with a Deadly Weapon or by Means of Force 1-10 Elder or Dependent Adult Abuse 1-13 Chapter Synopsis 1-17 Workbook Learning Activities 1-18 1-2 LD 7: Chapter 1 – Identifying and Classifying Crimes Related to Injury Crimes Against Persons Introduction The effective investigation of crimes against persons involves apprehending criminals, assisting crime victims, and protecting the community. To be an effectual peace officer, the student must understand how each of these components interconnect. Leadership A peace officer who responds to a call of a crime against a person has to wear many hats. Emergency care for victims, protection of community members against further harm, apprehension of the perpetrator, and preserving the integrity of the scene are all part of the job. Ethics A peace officer responding to a call where a person has been seriously injured at the hands of another may experience many difficult emotions including revulsion, anger, and the desire for revenge. Peace officers and community members share these reactions, which cannot easily be brushed away. It is the peace officer’s job to keep a clear head, bring the situation back to normal as quickly as possible, and avoid the temptation of dispensing street justice or engaging in retaliation. Policing A peace officer must be able to explain how these crimes impact a in the community’s perception of crime, fear, and law enforcement. community LD 7: Chapter 1 – Identifying and Classifying Crimes Related to Injury 1-3 Report Writing Tip Battery: Ask questions that will bring the observations or thoughts of others into a intent-action- clear picture of what happened.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Submission to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women on Femicide Related Data and Information
    Submission to the United Nations Special Rapporteur on violence against women on femicide related data and information November 2020 The Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia (National Human Rights Institution) submits the following information to the UN Special Rapporteur on Violence Against Women, its Causes and Consequences, Ms Dubravka in response to her call for femicide related data and information.1 Administrative data (by numbers and percentage) on homicide/femicide or gender-related killings of women for the last 3 years (2018-2020). The Human Rights Ombudsman of the Republic of Slovenia acquired the following data on the number of homicides/femicides in Slovenia from the Ministry of Interior of the Republic of Slovenia on 18th and 24th November 2020. 1. The total number of homicides of women and men As a homicide/femicide, we considered the following crimes under the Slovenian Criminal Code:2 manslaughter (Article 115),3 murder (Article 116),4 voluntary manslaughter (Article 117)5 and negligent homicide (Article 118).6 In 2018, the police dealt with 49 crimes of homicide. In 21 cases victims were women, in 28 victims were men. In 2019, the police dealt with 27 homicides; women were victims in 8 cases, men were victims in 19. From 1st January to 11th November 2020, the police dealt with 41 homicides, 18 committed against women, 23 against men. 1 Femicide Watch call 2020, www.ohchr.org/EN/Issues/Women/SRWomen/Pages/FemicideWatchCall2020.aspx 2 Kazenski zakonik (KZ-1), www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO5050.
    [Show full text]
  • Second Degree Murder, Malice, and Manslaughter in Nebraska: New Juice for an Old Cup John Rockwell Snowden University of Nebraska College of Law
    Nebraska Law Review Volume 76 | Issue 3 Article 2 1997 Second Degree Murder, Malice, and Manslaughter in Nebraska: New Juice for an Old Cup John Rockwell Snowden University of Nebraska College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr Recommended Citation John Rockwell Snowden, Second Degree Murder, Malice, and Manslaughter in Nebraska: New Juice for an Old Cup, 76 Neb. L. Rev. (1997) Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr/vol76/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law, College of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Law Review by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. John Rockwell Snowden* Second Degree Murder, Malice, and Manslaughter in Nebraska: New Juice for an Old Cup TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .......................................... 400 II. A Brief History of Murder and Malice ................. 401 A. Malice Emerges as a General Criminal Intent or Bad Attitude ...................................... 403 B. Malice Becomes Premeditation or Prior Planning... 404 C. Malice Matures as Particular States of Intention... 407 III. A History of Murder, Malice, and Manslaughter in Nebraska ............................................. 410 A. The Statutes ...................................... 410 B. The Cases ......................................... 418 IV. Puzzles of Nebraska Homicide Jurisprudence .......... 423 A. The Problem of State v. Dean: What is the Mens Rea for Second Degree Murder? ... 423 B. The Problem of State v. Jones: May an Intentional Homicide Be Manslaughter? ....................... 429 C. The Problem of State v. Cave: Must the State Prove Beyond a Reasonable Doubt that the Accused Did Not Act from an Adequate Provocation? .
    [Show full text]
  • SPEC'i!2Llisrr
    If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. SPEC'I!2lLISrr & JJ38v{'£S rr. 'Jv{OO1{l£, CO'Jv{'Jv{ISS I09{i£1{ CRIMINAL JUSTICE STANDARDS AND TRAINING COMMISSION Parking Enforcement Specialist ! The Parking Enforcement Specialist Course is approved by the Criminal Justice Standards and Training Commission and the Florida Department of Law Enforcement as prescribed by s. 316.640, Florida Statutes. This course is for non-sworn persons who are employed by police and sheriff's departments to provide for the development of knowledge and skills required to fulfill the responsibilities and duties of a Parking Enforcement Specialist. Even though successful completion of this course is required to perform the duties of a ?arking Enforcement Specialist, the Commission does not certify these individuals. This training may be presented at local agenci~s or at a certified training school. This course was adopted by the Comnlission several years ago without specific learning objectives. The attached learning goals and objectives parallel the law eDforcement basic recruit curriculum. Original goals and objectives were developed through subject matter experts for those areas not covered in the basic recruit curriculum. This 40-hour course consists of six (6) major topic areas: o Legal o ComnlUnications o Patrol o Vehicle Operation o Traffic o Interpersonal Though the Commission does no"t certify these individuals, it is necessary to maintain job related, up-to-date training. In order to accomplish this we need your input and recommendations for continued enhancement of all training. Enclosed is a "course input form." If you believe there is a need for additions, deletions, etc., please fill out this form and return to the Bureau of Training, at the address noted on the form.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Quality Report Writing in Law Enforcement
    Running head: QUALITY REPORT WRITING IN LAW ENFORCEMENT 1 The Importance of Quality Report Writing in Law Enforcement Andy Hoots School of Law Enforcement Supervision Author Note Gerald Andrew Hoots, Jefferson County Sheriff's Office Andy Hoots is currently assigned to Patrol Division Any correspondence concerning this paper should be addressed to Jefferson County Sheriff's Office, 113 Main Street Pine Bluff, AR 71601 Attention Sergeant Andy Hoots QUALITY REPORT WRITING IN LAW ENFORCEMENT 2 Abstract The purpose of this paper is to address issues with and inform other law enforcement officers of the importance of law enforcement report writing. The importance of report writing is immeasurable. Report writing is a much needed skill that can make or break a successful career in law enforcement. Most law enforcement officers will spend as much or more time in their career writing reports than at any other single task. It is important to ensure all officers receive guidance and training with report writing, beyond what they are taught in the Arkansas Law Enforcement Training Academy. This paper will address reports written from first person and third person perspectives as well as law enforcement language versus plain language. QUALITY REPORT WRITING IN LAW ENFORCEMENT 3 The Importance of Quality Report Writing in Law Enforcement To many people in the law enforcement community, the topic of report writing is of little interest and is not the most exciting subject to read about or bring up in a discussion. However, just as genius is described as being one percent inspiration and ninety-nine percent perspiration, effective enforcement of the law is estimated to be one percent action and ninety-nine percent paperwork.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Homicide Act for England and Wales?
    The Law Commission Consultation Paper No 177 (Overview) A NEW HOMICIDE ACT FOR ENGLAND AND WALES? An Overview The Law Commission was set up by section 1 of the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Honourable Mr Justice Toulson, Chairman Professor Hugh Beale QC, FBA Mr Stuart Bridge Dr Jeremy Horder Professor Martin Partington CBE The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Steve Humphreys and its offices are at Conquest House, 37-38 John Street, Theobalds Road, London WC1N 2BQ. This overview, completed on 28 November 2005, is circulated for comment and criticism only. It does not represent the final views of the Law Commission. For those who are interested in a fuller discussion of the law and the Law Commission's proposals, our formal consultation paper is accessible from http://www.lawcom.gov.uk/murder.htm, or you can order a hard copy from TSO (www.tso.co.uk). The Law Commission would be grateful for comments on its proposals before 13 April 2006. Comments may be sent either – By post to: David Hughes Law Commission Conquest House 37-38 John Street Theobalds Road London WC1N 2BQ Tel: 020-7453-1212 Fax: 020-7453-1297 By email to: [email protected] It would be helpful if, where possible, comments sent by post could also be sent on disk, or by email to the above address, in any commonly used format. All responses will be treated as public documents in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, and may be made available to third parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Case No. S192644 SUPREME COURT of the STATE OF
    Case No. S192644 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff and Respondent, V. TARE NICHOLAS BELTRAN, Defendant and Appellant. First Appellate District, Division Four, Case No. A124392 San Francisco County Superior Court, Case Nos. 175503, 203443 The Honorable Robert L. Dondero, Judge APPLICATION OF SAN FRANCISCO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONSORTIUM, CALIFORMA WOMEN LAWYERS, CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, QUEEN’S BENCH BAR ASSOCIATION, AN]) WOMEN LAWYERS OF SACRAMENTO TO FILE AMICI CURIAE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; AND AMICI BRIEF BAY AREA LEGAL AID GREINES, MARTIN, STEIN & Minouche Kandel (SBN 157098) RICRLAND LLP 1035 Market Street, 6th Floor Cynthia E. Tobisman (SBN 197983) SanFrancisco, California 94103 - KentJ.Bullard-(SBN 176194) Telephone: (415) 982-1300 Lara M. Krieger (SBN 218801) Facsimile: (415) 982-4243 5900 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor E-Mail: mkandelbaylega1 .org Los Angeles, California 90036 Telephone: (310) 859-7811 Facsimile: (310) 276-5261 E-Mail: [email protected] E-Mail: kbullardgmsr.com E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Prospective Amici Curiae SAN FRANCISCO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONSORTRJM, CALIFORNIA WOMEN LAWYERS, CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, QUEEN’S BENCH BAR ASSOCIATION, AND WOMEN LAWYERS OF SACRAMENTO TABLE OF CONTENTS Page APPLICATION OF SAN FRANCISCO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CONSORTIUM, CALIFORNIA WOMEN LAWYERS, CALIFORNIA PARTNERSHIP TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, QUEEN’S BENCH BAR ASSOCIATION, AND WOMEN LAWYERS OF SACRAMENTO TO FILE AMICI CURIAE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA xi AMICI CURIAE BRIEF 1 INTRODUCTION 1 ARGUMENT 3 I. THIS COURT SHOULD REEVALUATE AND REPUDIATE AUTHORITIES ALLOWING THE USE OF THE PROVOCATION DEFENSE TO PARTIALLY EXCUSE INTIMATE-PARTNER MURDERERS WITH A HISTORY OF HABITUAL DOMESTIC ABUSE.
    [Show full text]
  • 30504506 Overview of Investigations Course Outcome Summary
    Western Technical College 30504506 Overview of Investigations Course Outcome Summary Course Information Description Through classroom lecture, on-campus lab, and WI Department of Justice 720 Academy integration exercises students will learn and apply skills addressed in the following Department of Justice 720 Academy curriculum framework Phase I topics: Constitutional Law I, Crimes I, Interviews, and Report Writing. The DOJ Phase I Written Examination will be administered in this course. Total Credits 2 Textbooks No textbook required. Success Abilities 1. Cultivate Passion: Enhance Personal Connections 2. Cultivate Passion: Expand a Growth-Mindset 3. Cultivate Passion: Increase Self-Awareness 4. Live Responsibly: Develop Resilience 5. Live Responsibly: Embrace Sustainability 6. Live Responsibly: Foster Accountability 7. Refine Professionalism: Act Ethically 8. Refine Professionalism: Improve Critical Thinking 9. Refine Professionalism: Participate Collaboratively 10. Refine Professionalism: Practice Effective Communication Program Outcomes 1. Think critically 2. Manage emergencies 3. Communicate effectively Course Outcome Summary - Page 1 of 7 Wednesday, May 05, 2021 11:25 AM 4. Demonstrate professionalism 5. Conduct investigations 6. Interact with others Course Competencies 1. I.Q.1. Review the structure of the criminal justice system. Assessment Strategies 1.1. showing the structure of the criminal justice system Criteria 1.1. student will discuss the three branches of government (executive, legislative and judicial) and the separation of powers between all the branches. 1.2. student will discuss the units within the criminal justice system. 1.3. student will list examples of agencies within each unit of the criminal justice system. 1.4. student will explain how various criminal justice units are related. 1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Training Handbook
    FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING CENTERS OFFICE OF CHIEF COUNSEL GLYNCO, GEORGIA LEGAL TRAINING HANDBOOK 2019 Foreword January 2019 The mission of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers (FLETC) is to serve as the federal government’s leader for, and provider of, world-class law enforcement training. In fulfilling this mandate, Office of Chief Counsel (OCC) Attorney-Advisors / Senior Instructors provide legal training in all areas of criminal law and procedure, including Constitutional law, authority and jurisdiction, search and seizure, use of force, self-incrimination, courtroom evidence, courtroom testimony, electronic law and evidence, criminal statutes, and civil liability. While a large part of the OCC training mission focuses on newly hired law enforcement officers, the OCC also provides training for advanced law enforcement officers and attorneys in the Continuing Legal Education Training Program (CLETP) and related Legal Updates. In this spirit, we offer our Legal Training Handbook. The 2019 edition includes materials for basic training, advanced training, and for field use. The Legal Training Reference Book is a companion to the Handbook. The Additional Resources section in it contains numerous pieces of legal information helpful in your day-to-day activities as a law enforcement officer. It is our hope in the Office of Chief Counsel that the Legal Training Handbook and Reference Book can serve law enforcement students and law enforcement officers alike. While this text provides an exceptional review of important legal concepts, you should not limit yourself to this publication. An additional resource for federal, state and local law enforcement officers and agents is the FLETC.gov website: https://www.fletc.gov/legal-resources Located there are a number of resources including articles, podcasts, links, federal circuit court and Supreme Court case digests, and The Federal Law Enforcement Informer.
    [Show full text]
  • Manslaughter Working Group Report to the Commission
    MANSLAUGHTER WORKING GROUP REPORT TO THE COMMISSION December 15, 1997 Pamela O. Barron, Chair Alan C. Dorhoffer Raymond L. Dummett Jerry E. Jones Arthur A. Meltzer Rachel S. Singer TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Purpose ..................................................................1 Procedure .................................................................1 Voluntary Manslaughter .....................................................2 A. Statutory and Guideline Penalties ....................................2 B. Primary Issues for Consideration ....................................3 C. Principal Findings ................................................3 1. Analysis of Commission Monitoring Data and Case Information .......3 2. Inter-jurisdictional Comparison ................................4 3. Comparison with Other Chapter Two Violent Offense Guidelines ......5 4. Comparison with Other Statutory Maximum Penalties ...............6 5. Probation Officers' Survey ....................................7 D. Public Hearing Testimony ..........................................7 E. Options .......................................................7 1. Increased Statutory Maximum Penalty ..........................7 2. Base Offense Level Increase ..................................8 3. Specific Offense Characteristics/Encouraged Upward Departure .......8 4. Supervised Release .........................................8 Involuntary Manslaughter ...................................................9 A. Statutory and Guideline Penalties ....................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Sexual Assault Response Team SART Handbook
    Sexual Assault Response Team SART Handbook OUR MISSION is to facilitate and support a collaborative, victim-centered approach to the prevention of and response to adolescent and adult sexual violence. V e r s i o n III J u l y 2 0 0 9 The SART Handbook is supported by Grant No. 2008-TA-AK-K029 awarded by the Office on Violence Against Women, U.S. Department of Justice. The opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this handbook are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Justice, Office on Violence Against Women. ii Oregon Attorney General’s Sexual Assault Task Force CONTENTS CONTENTS Task Force Information.....................................................................................................................................................................................v Introduction.........................................................................................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1: SART: A Victim-Centered Collaborative Response.......................................................................................................................5 Chapter 2: SART: Development and Sustainability........................................................................................................................................9 Chapter 3: Advocacy Response....................................................................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • ICCS Mapping Exercise
    ICCS Mapping Exercise Sarika Dewan Data Development and Dissemination Unit Consultant UNODC Recap • What is a correspondence table? o “A correspondence table systematically explains where, and to what extent, the categories in one classification may be found in other classifications” . • What does “mapping” to the ICCS mean? o Mapping means determining for each offence category in the national crime statistics the category in the ICCS that most closely matches its description The correspondence table template Example 1 from a National Penal Code 299. Culpable homicide “Whoever causes death by doing an act with the intention of causing death, or with the intention of causing such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, or with the knowledge that he is likely by such act to cause death, commits the offence of culpable homicide. “ Illustration: A lays sticks and turf over a pit, with the intention of thereby causing death, or with the knowledge that death is likely to be thereby caused. Z, believing the ground to be firm, treads on it, falls in and is killed. A has committed the offence of culpable homicide. 300. Murder “Except in the cases hereinafter excepted, culpable homicide is murder— (a) if the act by which the death is caused is done with the intention of causing death; (b) if it is done with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause the death of the person to whom the harm is caused; (c) if it is done with the intention of causing bodily injury to any person, and the bodily injury intended to be inflicted is sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death; or (d) if the person committing the act knows that it is so imminently dangerous that it must in all probability cause death, or such bodily injury as is likely to cause death, and commits such act without any excuse for incurring the risk of causing death, or such injury as aforesaid.” Illustration: A shoots Z with the intention of killing him.
    [Show full text]
  • Manslaughter by Motorists
    Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 1938 Manslaughter by Motorists James J. Robinson Indiana University School of Law - Bloomington Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Transportation Law Commons Recommended Citation Robinson, James J., "Manslaughter by Motorists" (1938). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 2218. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/2218 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MINNESOTA LAW REVIEW Journal of the State Bar Association VOLUME XXII MAY, 1938 No. 6 MANSLAUGHTER BY MOTORISTS- By JAMES J. RoBINsoN* W HILE a motorist, D, is driving an automobile on a city street or along a country highway, his car strikes another person, X, either directly or by collision with the vehicle in which X is riding, inflicting injuries from which X dies. Has D committed a homicide? If so, has he committed a homicide which is criminal? The guilt or the innocence of D, under the criminal law of almost all of the states, of the federal government, and of Eng- land, is to be determined by considering the facts of the case with relation to five classifications of homicide which have been made by the common law. By consideration of the cases possible under the facts stated above it will be seen that the killing may be: (I) an intended homicide,--case 1, murder; case 2, voluntary manslaughter; or case 3, justifiable homicide; or (II) no homi- cide,--case 4, killing by accident, not by D; or (III) an unin- tended homicide,-case 5, excusable homicide by negligence; or case 6, involuntary manslaughter.
    [Show full text]