DOCSLIB.ORG

North Fork River Improvement Association (Nfria)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
North Fork River Improvement Association (Nfria) NFRIA Volunteer Monitoring Data Report, 2009 NORTH FORK RIVER IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION (NFRIA) VOLUNTEER WATER QUALTIY MONITORING NETWORK October 2004 – October 2007 Data Report NFRIA Volunteer collecting a sample on the North Fork of the Gunnison River. NFRIA PO BOX 682 HOTCHKISS, CO 81419 122 A. EAST BRIDGE STREET PHONE: (970) 872-4614 FAX: (970) 872-4612 E-MAIL: [email protected] WWW.NFRIA.PAONIA.COM 1-1 NFRIA Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Data Report, 2009 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS...................................................................................... V EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................VI 1. DESCRIPTION OF THE NORTH FORK WATERSHED .............................. 1-1 1.1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1-1 NFRIA................................................................................................. 1-1 North Fork Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Network............................. 1-1 1.2. WATERSHED DESCRIPTION.................................................................... 1-2 1.3. POINT SOURCES................................................................................ 1-4 1.4. LAND USE ....................................................................................... 1-5 1.5. FLOW DATA ..................................................................................... 1-5 1.6. OTHER WATER QUALITY MONITORING EFFORTS ........................................... 1-7 1.7. WATER QUALITY POLLUTION RISKS.......................................................... 1-7 1.8. WATER QUALITY STANDARDS................................................................. 1-7 2. NORTH FORK VOLUNTEER MONITORING NETWORK ........................... 2-1 2.1. INTRODUCTIONS................................................................................ 2-1 2.2. WATER QUALITY MONITORING STATIONS................................................... 2-1 2.3. WATER QUALITY PARAMETERS MONITORED................................................. 2-3 2.4. WHERE ARE SAMPLES ANALYZED? ........................................................... 2-3 2.5. SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES...................................... 2-5 2.6. VOLUNTEER TRAINING AND CERTIFICATION................................................. 2-5 2.7. QUALITY CONTROL/QUALITY ASSURANCE MEASURES ..................................... 2-6 2.8. DATA REPORTING .............................................................................. 2-6 2.9. PROJECT SPONSORS ........................................................................... 2-6 3. FIELD DATA ........................................................................................ 3-1 3.1. HARDNESS ...................................................................................... 3-1 3.2. ALKALINITY ..................................................................................... 3-2 3.3. PH ............................................................................................... 3-3 3.4. DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND TEMPERATURE .................................................... 3-4 4. NUTRIENT DATA ................................................................................. 4-1 4.1. SULFUR (SULFATES) ........................................................................... 4-1 4.2. TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS (TSS) .......................................................... 4-2 4.3. PHOSPHOROUS ................................................................................. 4-4 4.4. PHOSPHOROUS AND TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS ........................................... 4-5 4.5. NITROGEN (NITRATE + NITRITE AS NITROGEN) ........................................... 4-6 4.6. NITROGEN (AMMONIA) .......................................................................4-10 5. METALS DATA ................................................................................... 5-11 5.1. ALUMINUM .....................................................................................5-12 5.2. ARSENIC .......................................................................................5-13 5.3. CADMIUM.......................................................................................5-14 5.4. CALCIUM .......................................................................................5-14 5.5. COPPER.........................................................................................5-15 5.6. IRON............................................................................................5-16 5.7. LEAD............................................................................................5-18 5.8. MANGANESE ...................................................................................5-18 5.9. MAGNESIUM ...................................................................................5-18 1-2 NFRIA Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Data Report, 2009 5.10. SELENIUM ......................................................................................5-19 5.11. ZINC ............................................................................................5-21 6. BACTERIA DATA ................................................................................. 6-1 7. MACROINVERTEBRATE DATA .............................................................. 7-1 8. CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................... 8-1 Field Parameters .................................................................................. 8-1 Nutrients............................................................................................. 8-1 Metals................................................................................................. 8-2 Bacteria .............................................................................................. 8-2 Macroinvertebrates ............................................................................... 8-2 9. WORKS CITED .................................................................................... 9-1 10. APPENDICES ................................................................................. 10-1 10.1. RAW FIELD DATA..............................................................................10-2 10.2. RAW NUTRIENT DATA ........................................................................10-8 10.3. RAW METALS DATA .........................................................................10-14 10.4. RAW BACTERIA DATA.......................................................................10-22 10.5. RAW MACROINVERTEBRATE DATA.........................................................10-55 TABLE OF TABLES TABLE 1-1 LIST OF NPDES DISCHARGE FACILITIES ................................................... 1-4 TABLE 1-2 USGS GAGING STATIONS IN THE NORTH FORK WATERSHED............................ 1-5 TABLE 1-3 STREAM SEGMENTS AND WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ................................... 1-8 TABLE 1-4 IMPAIRED SEGMENTS ON THE 303(D) LIST................................................1-10 TABLE 1-5 SEGMENTS ON THE MONITORING AND EVALUATION LIST ................................1-10 TABLE 2-1 NETWORK WATER MONITORING STATIONS................................................. 2-2 TABLE 2-2 PARAMETERS MONITORED BY THE NETWORK................................................ 2-3 TABLE 2-3 PARAMETERS MONITORED BY THE NETWORK................................................ 2-4 TABLE 2-4 METHODS AND REPORTING LIMITS .......................................................... 2-5 TABLE 3-1 EPA HARDNESS RANGES ..................................................................... 3-1 TABLE 5-1 NUMERIC STANDARDS FOR ARSENIC IN THE NORTH FORK AND LOWER GUNNISON BASINS ...............................................................................................5-13 TABLE 5-2 DISSOLVED LEAD IN THE NORTH FORK ....................................................5-18 TABLE 5-3 DISSOLVED SELENIUM EXCEEDANCES ......................................................5-20 TABLE 6-1 NORTH FORK E. COLI EXCEEDANCES ........................................................ 6-1 TABLE 7-1 EVALUATION MATRIX OF NORTH FORK MACROINVERTEBRATES .......................... 7-2 TABLE OF EQUATIONS EQUATION 5-1. CADMIUM TABLE VALUE STANDARDS ................................................5-11 EQUATION 5-2. COPPER TABLE VALUE STANDARDS ..................................................5-11 EQUATION 5-3. LEAD TABLE VALUE STANDARDS .....................................................5-11 EQUATION 5-4. ZINC TABLE VALUE STANDARDS .....................................................5-11 1-3 NFRIA Volunteer Water Quality Monitoring Data Report, 2009 TABLE OF FIGURES FIGURE 1-1 NORTH FORK HEADWATERS ................................................................. 1-2 FIGURE 1-2 LOCATION AND TOPOGRAPHY: NORTH FORK WATERSHED............................... 1-3 FIGURE 1-3 MAP OF NPDES DISCHARGE FACILITIES .................................................. 1-4 FIGURE 1-4 LAND COVER: NORTH FORK WATERSHED ................................................. 1-6 FIGURE 1-5 LOCATION: WBID SEGMENTS IN THE NORTH FORK ....................................1-11 FIGURE 1-6 IMPAIRED WATERS LIST IN THE NORTH FORK ...........................................1-12 FIGURE 1-7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION LISTED WATERS IN THE NORTH FORK ...............1-13 FIGURE 2-1 CSU ROGERS MESA RESEARCH LAB ......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aquatic Ecology Teacher Guide
    National Park Service Rocky Mountain U.S. Department of Interior Rocky Mountain National Park Aquatic Ecology Teacher Guide Table of Contents Teacher Guides..............................................................................................................................2 Schedule an Education Program with a Ranger.......................................................................2 Aquatic Ecology Background Information Introduction........................................................................................................................4 Water Quality in RMNP...................................................................................................5 Pollution in RMNP............................................................................................................6 Chemical Testing Methods................................................................................................6 Riparian Habitat...............................................................................................................15 Aquatic Invertebrates.......................................................................................................18 Aquatic Ecology Resources Classroom Resources.......................................................................................................21 Glossary.............................................................................................................................22 References.........................................................................................................................24
    [Show full text]
  • Travel Summary
    Travel Summary – All Trips and Day Trips Retirement 2016-2020 Trips (28) • Relatives 2016-A (R16A), September 30-October 20, 2016, 21 days, 441 photos • Anza-Borrego Desert 2016-A (A16A), November 13-18, 2016, 6 days, 711 photos • Arizona 2017-A (A17A), March 19-24, 2017, 6 days, 692 photos • Utah 2017-A (U17A), April 8-23, 2017, 16 days, 2214 photos • Tonopah 2017-A (T17A), May 14-19, 2017, 6 days, 820 photos • Nevada 2017-A (N17A), June 25-28, 2017, 4 days, 515 photos • New Mexico 2017-A (M17A), July 13-26, 2017, 14 days, 1834 photos • Great Basin 2017-A (B17A), August 13-21, 2017, 9 days, 974 photos • Kanab 2017-A (K17A), August 27-29, 2017, 3 days, 172 photos • Fort Worth 2017-A (F17A), September 16-29, 2017, 14 days, 977 photos • Relatives 2017-A (R17A), October 7-27, 2017, 21 days, 861 photos • Arizona 2018-A (A18A), February 12-17, 2018, 6 days, 403 photos • Mojave Desert 2018-A (M18A), March 14-19, 2018, 6 days, 682 photos • Utah 2018-A (U18A), April 11-27, 2018, 17 days, 1684 photos • Europe 2018-A (E18A), June 27-July 25, 2018, 29 days, 3800 photos • Kanab 2018-A (K18A), August 6-8, 2018, 3 days, 28 photos • California 2018-A (C18A), September 5-15, 2018, 11 days, 913 photos • Relatives 2018-A (R18A), October 1-19, 2018, 19 days, 698 photos • Arizona 2019-A (A19A), February 18-20, 2019, 3 days, 127 photos • Texas 2019-A (T19A), March 18-April 1, 2019, 15 days, 973 photos • Death Valley 2019-A (D19A), April 4-5, 2019, 2 days, 177 photos • Utah 2019-A (U19A), April 19-May 3, 2019, 15 days, 1482 photos • Europe 2019-A (E19A), July
    [Show full text]
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile
    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDICES Cover Photo Credit: Southern Ute Indian Tribe Gold King Mine Release of Acid Mine Drainage to the Animas and San Juan Rivers
    United States Office of Research and EPA/600/R-16/296 Environmental Protection Development January 2017 Agency Washington DC 20460 Analysis of the Transport and Fate of Metals Released from the Gold King Mine in the Animas and San Juan Rivers APPENDICES Cover photo credit: Southern Ute Indian Tribe Gold King Mine Release of Acid Mine Drainage to the Animas and San Juan Rivers Appendix A. Information about Acquired Data Sources Appendix A-1 Gold King Mine Release of Acid Mine Drainage to the Animas and San Juan Rivers Table of Contents LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................................ 3 TABLE A-1. LINKS TO ACCESS GOLD KING MINE EVENT-RELATED DATA ................................................................. 4 TABLE A-2. LINKS TO ACCESS GOLD KING MINE POST-EVENT RELATED DATA .......................................................... 5 TABLE A-3. LINKS TO ACCESS GOLD KING MINE PRE-EVENT RELATED DATA ............................................................ 6 TABLE A-4. LINKS TO ACCESS GENERAL SOURCES OF DATA USED TO SUPPORT GROUNDWATER ANALYSIS AND MODELING . 7 TABLE A-5. LINKS TO ACCESS GENERAL SOURCES OF DATA USED TO SUPPORT ANALYSIS AND MODELING ....................... 9 TABLE A-6. CONSOLIDATED LIST OF SITES SAMPLED BY DATA PROVIDERS DURING AND AFTER THE GOLD KING MINE RELEASE .......................................................................................................................................... 10 TABLE A-7. LIST OF METALS LABORATORY METHODS FOR SURFACE WATER SAMPLES BY DATA PROVIDER .................... 21 TABLE A-8. LIST OF METALS LABORATORY METHODS FOR SEDIMENT SAMPLES BY DATA PROVIDER ............................ 27 TABLE A-9. ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY FOR METAL ANALYSES. INCLUDES METHODS USED FOR HISTORIC SAMPLES. .... 31 TABLE A-10. LIST OF LABORATORY METHODS FOR GENERAL ANALYTES BY DATA PROVIDER. ..................................... 33 TABLE A-11. LINKS TO QUALITY ASSURANCE DOCUMENTATION FROM DATA PROVIDERS ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan
    River Watch Water Quality Sampling Manual Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan Every monitoring program needs to have planned evaluation both formative and summative. Formative evaluation is assessing individual workflows or tasks, such as sample collection, processing or specific analyses. Did the instructions achieve desired results, where they clear, did the volunteer understand what is needed from them, etc. These are lower stakes, more of an iterative process and are embedded in the workflow execution. For example if an unknown pH result fails, staff and volunteer correct the problem, remove any suspect data, document and carry on. Most elements in the QAQC plan and all standard operating procedures (SOPs) provide formative evaluation for River Watch. Summative evaluation assess the overall monitoring program as a system, is River Watch answering our monitoring questions? Is the data being used to achieve desired results, outcomes and impacts? Are volunteers staying with program and new ones onboarding? An annual evaluation of all program elements is conducted by staff to address summative evaluation. Here staff break down all program elements and workflows, explore changes in volunteers, data users, regulations and operations that require program adjustments, include adjusting desired results, outcomes or impacts. Every monitoring program should have standard operating procedures (SOPs) that provide the appropriate formality and rigor to achieve data quality objectives and serve as the instructions to implement all tasks, workflows and processes from A to Z in a monitoring program. Most SOPs are considered internal documents and proprietary. Sections of the River Watch SOP can be provided upon request.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality at Hetlebakken; River Health and Suitability of the Lake For
    Hetlebakkstemma 2014 Water quality at Hetlebakken; River health and suitability of the lake for recreational use Group 8: Sigrid Skrivervik Bruvoll, Kjetil Farsund Fossheim, Aksel Anker Henriksen, Alexander Price BIO300 Autumn 2014 1 BIO300 UiB Group 8: Sigrid Skrivervik Bruvoll, Kjetil Farsund Fossheim, Aksel Anker Henriksen, Alexander Price Hetlebakkstemma 2014 Content 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Materials and methods ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Sampling area and sites ................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Sampling and sample analysis ....................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Data Analysis and Statistics ......................................................................................................... 12 3. Results ............................................................................................................................................... 13 3.1: Abiotic Factors ............................................................................................................................ 13 3.2 Thermotolerant Coliform Bacteria .............................................................................................. 14 3.3 Biodiversity
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan
    River Watch Water Quality Sampling Manual Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan Quality Assurance and Quality Control Plan A quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) plan tells the data provider and user what the quality of data is and how that quality will be achieved in order to answer the questions being asked of the data. Any data user can then decide to use the data for the same purpose and questions or other purposes responsibly. Documenting the quality of data collected and being transparent about the quality and methods to achieve that quality is what makes data an asset. It is an essential component for a monitoring program to deliver measurable results. The entire River Watch Quality Assurance Project Plan (RW QAPP) and the River Watch Standard Operating Procedures (RW SOP) is available on the River Watch website, www.coloradoriverwatch.org. These documents go into detail on our QA/QC methods and reporting and are often necessary when applying for grants to do water quality work. This QA/QC plan here is a subset of the larger RW QAPP should any entity ask about the quality of your data. River Watch’s primary data user is the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment’s, Water Quality Control Division and Commission and the Colorado Clean Water Act, that dictates our field and laboratory methods and our QA/QC plan. River Watch follows CDHPE field and laboratory methods. There are many elements of the River Watch QA/QC plan, most of which focus on two themes. Precision ensures analyses can be repeated with similar results, within an acceptable margin of error.
    [Show full text]
  • CCLOA Directory 2021
    2 0 2 1 Colorado’s Most Comprehensive Campground Guide View Complete Details on CampColorado.com Welcome to Colorado! Turn to CampColorado.com as your first planning resource. We’re delighted to assist as you plan your Colorado camping trips. Camp Colorado All Year Wildfires Table of Contents Go ahead! Take in the spring, autumn and winter festivals, Obey the local-most fire restrictions! That might be the Travel Resources & Essential Information ..................................................... 2 the less crowded trails, and some snowy adventures like campground office. On public land, it’s usually decided by snowshoeing, snowmobiling, cross country skiing, and the county or city. Camp Colorado Campgrounds, RV Parks, & Other Rental Lodging .............. 4 even downhill skiing. Colorado Map ................................................................................................. 6 Wildfires can occur and spread quickly. Be alert! Have an MAP Colorado State Parks, Care for Colorado ...................................................... 8 Many Colorado campgrounds are open all year, with escape plan. Page 6 Federal Campgrounds, National Parks, Monuments and Trails ................... 10 perhaps limited services yet still catering to the needs of those who travel in the off-seasons. Campfires aren’t necessarily a given in Colorado. Dry Other Campgrounds ...................................................................................... 10 conditions and strong winds can lead to burn bans. These Wildfire Awareness, Leave No
    [Show full text]
  • Your Guide to Colorado's 41 State Parks
    COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Your Guide to Colorado’s 41 State Parks 2019-2020 Edition cpw.state.co.us CAMPING RESERVATIONS • 1-800-244-5613 • cpw.state.co.us i Welcome to Your State Parks! Plan Your Visit Wherever you go in Colorado, there’s Colorado’s state parks are open every day of the year, weather Cheyenne Mountain a state park waiting to welcome State Park permitting. Day-use areas are generally open from 5 a.m. to you. Mountains or prairies, rivers or 10 p.m., and some parks may have closed gates after hours. forests, out in the country or next to Campgrounds are open 24 hours a day. Contact individual parks the city… Colorado’s 41 state parks are for specific hours of operation and office hours. Check our website as diverse as the state itself, and they for seasonal or maintenance closures: cpw.state.co.us offer something for everyone. Take a hair-raising whitewater river trip, or Entrance Passes kick back in a lawn chair and watch All Colorado state parks charge an entrance fee. Cost of a daily pass the sunset. Enjoy a family picnic, cast may vary by park ($8–$9). They cover all occupants of a vehicle and a line in the water, take a hike, ride a are valid until noon the day after purchase. Some parks may charge horse, try snowshoeing or discover a per-person fee for cyclists and walk-ins ($4). Fees are used to help geocaching. From Eastern Plains pay operating costs. Cherry Creek State Park charges an additional parks at 3,800 feet to high-mountain fee for the Cherry Creek Basin Water Quality Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • North Fork of the Gunnison River Watershed Plan Update
    NORTH FORK OF THE GUNNISON RIVER WATERSHED PLAN UPDATE NORTH FORK RIVER IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION (NFRIA) June 30, 2010 North Fork of the Gunnison downstream of Somerset. Photograph by Mike Maxwell WWW.NFRIA.ORG North Fork River Watershed Plan 2010 Update ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This watershed plan updates the North Fork Watershed Restoration Action Strategy completed by the North Fork River Improvement Association (NFRIA) in November, 2000. It was supported by a Severance Tax Grant used by the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) to augment the Colorado Healthy Rivers Fund. Chris Sturm acted as project coordinator for CWCB. David Stiller, Executive Director, was the project coordinator for NFRIA. Sarah Sauter, as a consultant to NFRIA, was this document’s primary author. Others contributed materially to the success and completion of this update. Grady Harper and Sean Barna, OSM/VISTAs working for NFRIA, coordinated and planned public meetings where NFRIA received important public input. Our thanks go also to the following individuals who rendered valuable advice to NFRIA and commented on draft versions of this plan: Barbara Galloway, ERO Resources Corporation Bonie Pate, Water Quality Control Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Chris Sturm, Colorado Water Conservation Board, Colorado Department of Natural Resources Dan Kowalski, Division of Wildlife, Colorado Department of Natural Resources David Kanzer, Colorado River Water Conservation District Jeff Crane, Colorado Watershed Assembly John G. Elliott, U.S. Geological Survey Peter Kearl, United Companies Rebecca Anthony, Water Quality Control Division, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Additionally, we wish to thank the NFRIA directors, members and supporters who provided the organization and North Fork community with the necessary energy and encouragement to engage in this planning process.
    [Show full text]
  • CODE of COLORADO REGULATIONS 2 CCR 405-1 Colorado Parks and Wildlife
    DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Colorado Parks and Wildlife CHAPTER P-1 - PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION LANDS 2 CCR 405-1 [Editor’s Notes follow the text of the rules at the end of this CCR Document.] _________________________________________________________________________ ARTICLE I - GENERAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO ALL PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION LANDS AND WATERS # 100 - PARKS AND OUTDOOR RECREATION LANDS A. Definitions 1. “Parks and Outdoor Recreation Lands” shall mean, whenever used throughout these regulations, all parks and outdoor recreation lands and waters under the administration and jurisdiction of the Division of Parks and Wildlife. 2. “Wearable Personal Flotation Device” shall mean a U.S. Coast Guard approved personal flotation device that is intended to be worn or otherwise attached to the body. A personal flotation device labeled or marked as Type I, II, III, or V (with Type I, II, or III performance) is considered a wearable personal flotation device as set forth in the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 33, Parts 175 and 181(2014). B. When these regulations provide that an activity is prohibited except as posted or permitted as posted, the Division will control these activities by posting signs identifying the prohibited or authorized activities, specifying the affected area and the basis for the posting. The Division will apply the following criteria in determining if an activity will be restricted or authorized pursuant to posting: 1. Public safety or welfare. 2. Potential impacts to wildlife, parks or outdoor recreation resources. 3. Remediation of prior impacts to wildlife, parks or outdoor recreation resources. 4. Whether the activity will unreasonably interfere with existing authorized activities or third party agreements.
    [Show full text]
  • State of Colorado Invitation for Bid
    State of Colorado Invitation for Bid IFB1 2015*294 BIDS DUE: June 26, 2015 @ 11:00 AM (MST) All Bids shall be submitted F.O.B. Destination unless Otherwise Specified Per the attached specifications, terms, and conditions Bidders are urged to read the bid thoroughly before submitting a bid. ISSUING OFFICE This Invitation for Bid (IFB) is issued by the State of Colorado, Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of the Colorado Division of Parks and Wildlife. All contact regarding this solicitation is to be directed to: Department of Parks and Wildlife Raven Lopez, CPW Purchasing Office 1313 Sherman St., Room 618, Denver, Co 80203 P-303-866-3203 X 4611 or emailed to: Email: [email protected] PURPOSE The purpose of this Invitation for Bid is to obtain competitive quotations from qualified individuals and firms for Resale Firewood. The State has been divided into three (3) Areas and three (3) awards will be made for firewood. It is the intent of Colorado Parks and Wildlife that, if necessary, multiple awards may be made to different vendor in regards to this solicitation. Page 1 of 11 IFB1 2015*294 State of Colorado Invitation for Bid SPECIFICATIONS Description Resale Firewood Quantity 32,880 Bundles (see attached Excel File for breakdown for each Park) Bundles Must be no less than 16 inches long, 10 inches wide & .75 cubic feet in volume per bundle No fewer than 9 pieces of wood per bundle Wrapped in sturdy wrapping to ensure bundles do not break apart Sturdy handle attached to the bundle that does not break For planning purposes
    [Show full text]