DOCSLIB.ORG

Print July 1999 Working Copy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Print July 1999 Working Copy BREEDING EUROPEAN HONEY-BUZZARDS IN BRITAIN S. J. ROBERTS,J.M.S.LEWIS AND I. T.WILLIAMS European Honey-buzzards Pernis apivorus (S. J. Roberts) ABSTRACT The European Honey-buzzard Pernis apivorus has been one of the least-studied of Britain’s breeding birds, because of its limited range, its scarcity and its reputed susceptibility to disturbance. This paper shows, however, that it is far more widespread, considerably less rare and much less affected by human intrusion (if carried out with circumspection) than was previously thought. The authors hope to encourage a more-open attitude and to further responsible research into the species’ status and conservation requirements in Britain. 326 British Birds 92: 326–345, July 1999 BREEDING EUROPEAN HONEY-BUZZARDS IN BRITAIN he European Honey-buzzard METHODS Pernis apivorus (hereafter referred Research during 1989-97 identified three Tto as the Honey-buzzard) is one of distinct breeding habitats: (a) lowland the most widespread raptors in the World, southern woodlands, (b) central hill breeding throughout the temperate and country with mixed farmland/woodland boreal regions of Europe and eastwards and (c) upland coniferous plantations. The into boreal Asia (Cramp & Simmons 1980). definitions of these habitat types are, It has always been regarded as a rare indeed, very broad, and we accept that summer visitor to Britain (Hollom 1957; identifying regions or counties would Parslow 1973; Holloway 1996), but, in certainly prove more enlightening to recent years, breeding has been recorded various aspects of the paper. Some of those more frequently away from the traditional who have contributed important data to the stronghold of the New Forest (Gibbons et al. paper have done so, however, only with the 1993; Lovegrove et al. 1994). Despite this, it provision that we would not identify remained a poorly studied species in this regions or counties. Sixteen nesting areas country, with only limited published data (an ‘area’ containing all the known nest (e.g. one or two pairs in Nottinghamshire sites of a pair: Newton 1979) were during 1971-79: Irons 1980). attributed to one of these habitat types, During 1988–1991, The New Atlas of eight in the lowlands, three in the central Breeding Birds in Britain and Ireland (Gibbons hills and five in the uplands. et al. 1993) recorded evidence of breeding in Individual nesting trees have been ten tetrads in Britain, with individuals termed ‘nest sites’. Data were compared present in a further 17 tetrads. Recent between the different habitat types. investigation has shown that this species is Breeding Honey-buzzards were located by more widespread than previously recorded protracted watches at key periods in the in Britain, but, owing to its attraction for cycle and, where possible, individual birds egg-collectors, most sites are kept were identified by plumage or moult confidential. Although several people patterns. Males and females were identified monitor the numbers and distribution of by these methods, as were intruders. breeding Honey-buzzards, we are not Distinctive egg types have been laid in aware of any scientific research being three nesting areas, aiding identification of undertaken at present. Partly as a result of the individual female. These egg types have this paucity of records, we and several co- been monitored for up to four years workers began in the late 1980s to study the (currently). This may be the case in other species’ breeding ecology. nesting areas, but annual visits during This paper is based on information gathered incubation have not always been possible. at 52 nests in 16 nesting areas in upland, central A sudden change in egg type at one site and lowland Britain during 1989-97, and alerted the authors to the presence of a new includes information received from other female. fieldworkers. As the Honey-buzzard is a Nest-site altitudes and the area of Schedule 1 species, all nest visits were made woodland within 25 km2 around the under licence from the relevant licensing nesting areas were measured from 1:50,000 authority. These nests and nesting areas are Ordnance Survey Landranger maps. Clear- located widely across England and Wales, from felled areas of forestry were included as the north of England to the southern counties, woodland since these could not be and include widely scattered individual nests distinguished on OS maps. Nest sites were and small discrete populations; no information located in mature conifer, mature broadleaf was received from Scotland. Because of the or mixed woodland (intimate confidential nature of the information, some of conifer/broadleaf mix, as well as blocks of our co-workers wish to remain anonymous. broadleaf and conifer in close proximity). British Birds 92: 326–345, July 1999 327 BREEDING EUROPEAN HONEY-BUZZARDS IN BRITAIN Various parameters of the nest site were Despite an apparent historical association recorded, such as tree species, tree height, with lowland woodlands, Honey-buzzard nest height, distance of nest tree from rides nests were found across a wide range of or clearings, and topographical position. altitudes, with the lowest virtually at sea The minimum distances between active level and the highest at almost 500 m above nests were measured from 1:50,000 OS sea level. The median height of 50 nests was Landranger maps. between 90 m and100 m a.s.l. Detailed measurements of known-age Although generally associated with chicks were taken, and the ages of other large woodland tracts in Britain, the unknown-age chicks were estimated from amount of woodland in a sample of 14 nest their wing lengths. First-egg dates were areas across the range of habitats varied calculated by working back from the age considerably. Within 25 km2 around the of the oldest chick and allowing 35 days nest area, the woodland cover averaged for incubation. 45.8%. (The maximum was 81% and the Breeding success was estimated from a minimum 31%.) Only four nest areas total of 47 active nests found; it was also contained more than 50% woodland cover estimated for 15 of those that were located within the 25 km2. More-restricted at the egg stage. Chicks were weighed to measurements in the German Rhineland determine their rate of development. The revealed that 94% of nest-sites contained behaviour of adults and young at the nest 50-60% of woodland within 600 m of the was assessed during extended watches nest (Kostrzewa in press). from hides. Faecal samples were collected from CLIMATE active (and recently vacated) nests and It has been suggested that climate is a analysed at University College, Cardiff. crucial factor in the nesting success of Wasp species were identified by their jaws breeding Honey-buzzards (Kostrzewa 1989; (larval stage) or their head capsules (pupal Batten et al. 1990), either suppressing the stage). Partly destroyed wasps’ nests were reproductive drive or resulting in nest examined for possible ‘farming’ by Honey- failure through food shortage or adverse buzzards. All other prey items were weather conditions. The south of England, casually recorded, whether at nests or being and particularly the New Forest, has long carried by adult Honey-buzzards. been regarded as the Honey-buzzard's stronghold in Britain, its mild climate being BROAD HABITAT REQUIREMENTS expected to favour a large raptor with a The Honey-buzzard has traditionally been mainly insectivorous diet. regarded as being largely confined to the If this were true, Honey-buzzards in southern counties of England and, in upland Britain, nesting at higher altitudes particular, the New Forest in Hampshire and with colder, wetter weather, should (Brown 1976). In these areas, broadleaf have poorer breeding success. This has woodlands had appeared to be the not been the case in our study, where preferred habitat, particularly Beech Fagus pairs breeding farther west and north sylvatica (Brown 1976; Sharrock 1976) on have enjoyed exceptional breeding success light or sandy soils (Batten et al. 1990) compared with ‘southern’ birds, despite where sufficient insect food is available nest sites often being subjected to cloud and (Martin 1992). rain for long periods. Of the 19 recorded The 52 nests located in the study nesting attempts in the uplands since 1991, related to 16 nesting areas. A total of 32 15 successfully fledged two young each, different nest sites was used, eight in the with an average of 1.58 young per nesting uplands, four in the central hills and 20 in attempt. There were no failures caused by the lowlands. inclement weather or food shortages. 328 British Birds 92: 326–345, July 1999 BREEDING EUROPEAN HONEY-BUZZARDS IN BRITAIN Compared with the published accounts end of the range given for Europe when from Nottinghamshire (Irons 1980), this is breeding success was affected (Kostrzewa an exceptionally high level of breeding 1989). Unfortunately, too few nests are success. During the period when chicks in adequately monitored throughout much of the uplands were thriving on wasps and the species’ British range to gain a thorough bumble-bees, nests were known to fail in understanding of the effects of weather Devon and the south of England, with the on productivity. cause given as adverse weather resulting in failure to lay or poor food supply to the AERIAL ACTIVITY nestlings (R. Khan verbally) Génsbøl (1986) The Honey-buzzard has a distinctive and stated that ‘In cold wet springs there are diagnostic display flight, named variously few wasps and this evidently reduces the as ‘wing-clapping’, ‘butterfly flight’ and birds’ reproductive drive’, but, in his ‘sky-dancing’. It has been described by study of British wasps, Spradbery (1973) several authors (see Cramp & Simmons concluded that ‘weather conditions may 1980), with peak activity recorded between influence mortality of queens and hinder mid May and mid June, and again from establishment of colonies, but do not play a mid July onwards.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Flight Behaviour During Foraging of the Social Wasp Vespula Vulgaris
    The Journal of Experimental Biology 208, 4523-4527 4523 Published by The Company of Biologists 2005 doi:10.1242/jeb.01932 Flight behaviour during foraging of the social wasp Vespula vulgaris (Hymenoptera: Vespidae) and four mimetic hoverflies (Diptera: Syrphidae) Sericomyia silentis, Myathropa florea, Helophilus sp. and Syrphus sp. Y. C. Golding1, M. Edmunds2 and A. R. Ennos1,* 1Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, 3.614 Stopford Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PT, UK and 2Department of Environmental Management, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PR1 2HE, UK *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]) Accepted 14 October 2005 Summary Many hoverfly species show specific or non specific Syrphus, showed similar flight behaviour to the wasps; it morphological resemblance to wasps (Vespula sp.) and it flew more slowly, and with more roundabout routes than has been suggested that they also show similar flight the other flies, hesitating before landing. These results behaviour. In this study we therefore compared the flight suggest that in hoverflies there is little reason to expect behaviour of wasps with that of four mimetic hoverflies, strict correlation between morphological and behavioural Sericomyia silentis, Myathropa florea, Helophilus sp. and mimicry; insects may acquire the similarities to their Syrphus sp., by filming insects while they were foraging on model more-or-less independently. an artificial array of flowers. Films were analysed to determine the routes taken, time spent hovering and flight speed. Of the four flies, only the non specific mimic, Key words: flight, mimicry, Syrphidae, behaviour. Introduction Batesian and Müllerian mimicry are textbook cases similar amounts of time foraging on individual flowers and demonstrating evolution by natural selection (Bates, 1862; flying between flowers (Golding and Edmunds, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Status of Birds of Prey and Owls in Norway
    Conservation status of birds of prey and owls in Norway Oddvar Heggøy & Ingar Jostein Øien Norsk Ornitologisk Forening 2014 NOF-BirdLife Norway – Report 1-2014 © NOF-BirdLife Norway E-mail: [email protected] Publication type: Digital document (pdf)/75 printed copies January 2014 Front cover: Boreal owl at breeding site in Nord-Trøndelag. © Ingar Jostein Øien Editor: Ingar Jostein Øien Recommended citation: Heggøy, O. & Øien, I. J. (2014) Conservation status of birds of prey and owls in Norway. NOF/BirdLife Norway - Report 1-2014. 129 pp. ISSN: 0805-4932 ISBN: 978-82-78-52092-5 Some amendments and addenda have been made to this PDF document compared to the 75 printed copies: Page 25: Picture of snowy owl and photo caption added Page 27: Picture of white-tailed eagle and photo caption added Page 36: Picture of eagle owl and photo caption added Page 58: Table 4 - hen harrier - “Total population” corrected from 26-147 pairs to 26-137 pairs Page 60: Table 5 - northern goshawk –“Total population” corrected from 1434 – 2036 pairs to 1405 – 2036 pairs Page 80: Table 8 - Eurasian hobby - “Total population” corrected from 119-190 pairs to 142-190 pairs Page 85: Table 10 - peregrine falcon – Population estimate for Hedmark corrected from 6-7 pairs to 12-13 pairs and “Total population” corrected from 700-1017 pairs to 707-1023 pairs Page 78: Photo caption changed Page 87: Last paragraph under “Relevant studies” added. Table text increased NOF-BirdLife Norway – Report 1-2014 NOF-BirdLife Norway – Report 1-2014 SUMMARY Many of the migratory birds of prey species in the African-Eurasian region have undergone rapid long-term declines in recent years.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring Migration of Soaring Birds Over the Bosphorus, Turkey, in 2006
    Spring migration of soaring birds over the Bosphorus, Turkey, in 2006 ÖzkAN ÜNER, kEREM ALi BoyLA, ERGÜN BAcAk, ERTuğRuL BiREL, İLhAN ÇELikoBA, CEM DALYAN, EVRIM TABUR & ÜMIT YARDIM The Bosphorus is one of the most important migration bottlenecks in the Middle East. However, most counts have been done during autumn and complete spring counts are very few. In spring 2006, a complete count of migrating soaring birds over the Bosphorus was carried out. We report a total of 100 051 birds, which consisted of 51 958 White Storks Ciconia ciconia, 16 185 Common Buzzards Buteo buteo, 15 232 Lesser Spotted Eagles Aquila pomarina and 9085 Honey Buzzards Pernis apivorus. The study demonstrates the importance of the Bosphorus for the spring migration of soaring birds. INTRODUCTION Turkey has major Western Palearctic migration crossroads, with corridors and bottlenecks for soaring birds in the northwestern (Bosphorus in Istanbul, Figure 1), northeastern (Borçka, Artvin province) and southern (Belen, Hatay province) parts of the country (Grimmett & Jones 1989). The Bosphorus is a well-known migration bottleneck for soaring birds due to its location at the junction between Europe and Asia. The whole population of eastern White Storks Ciconia ciconia, over 340 000 birds, flies over the Bosphorus. Zalles & Bildstein (2000) reported between 29 000 and 75 000 migrant raptors in autumn over the Bosphorus whereas a very recent multi-station but short survey has shown that more than 150 000 raptors use the area in autumn (Milvus Group 2008). Most of the world population of Lesser Spotted Eagles Aquila pomarina and Levant Sparrowhawks Accipiter brevipes, at least in autumn, crosses into Asia via the Bosphorus (Kirwan et al 2008) using the east Mediterranean route (Shirihai et al 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 74, No. 154/Wednesday, August 12, 2009
    40540 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 12, 2009 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR questions concerning this notice to the precluded finding on a petition to list above address. means that listing is warranted, but that Fish and Wildlife Service FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: the immediate proposal and timely Chief, Branch of Listing, Endangered promulgation of a final regulation is 50 CFR Part 17 Species Program, (see ADDRESSES); by precluded by higher priority listing [Docket No. FWS-R9-ES-2009-0057] telephone at 703-358-2171; or by actions. In making a warranted-but [90100 16641FLA-B6] facsimile at 703-358-1735). Persons who precluded finding under the Act, the use a telecommunications device for the Service must demonstrate that Endangered and Threatened Wildlife deaf (TDD) may call the Federal expeditious progress is being made to and Plants; Annual Notice of Findings Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 800- add and remove species from the lists of on Resubmitted Petitions for Foreign 877-8339. endangered and threatened wildlife and Species; Annual Description of SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: plants. Progress on Listing Actions Pursuant to section 4(b)(3)(C)(i) of the Background Act, when, in response to a petition, we AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, The Endangered Species Act of 1973, find that listing a species is warranted Interior. but precluded, we must make a new 12– ACTION: Notice of review. as amended (Act) (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.), provides two mechanisms for month finding annually until we SUMMARY: In this notice of review, we considering species for listing.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 of the World's Worst Invasive Alien Species
    100 OF THE WORLD’S WORST INVASIVE ALIEN SPECIES A SELECTION FROM THE GLOBAL INVASIVE SPECIES DATABASE Published by Contribution to the Global Invasive Species Programme (GISP) In Association with SPECIES SURVIVAL COMMISSION Citation Lowe S., Browne M., Boudjelas S., De Poorter M. (2000) 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species A selection from the Global Invasive Species Database. Published by The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN), 12pp. First published as special lift-out in Aliens 12, December 2000. Updated and reprinted version: November 2004. Electronic version available at: www.issg.org/booklet.pdf For information, or copies of the booklet in English, French or Spanish, please contact: ISSG Office: School of Geogra- phy and Environmental Sciences (SGES) University of Auckland (Tamaki Campus) Private Bag 92019 Auckland, New Zealand Phone: #64 9 3737 599 x85210 Fax: #64 9 3737 042 E-mail: [email protected] Development of the 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Spe- cies list has been made possible by Cover image: Brown tree snake the support of the Fondation (Boiga irregularis). d’Entreprise TOTAL (1998 - 2000). Photo: Gordon Rodda Printed in New Zealand by: Hollands Printing Ltd Contact: Otto van Gulik Email: [email protected] 2 Biological Invasion What happens when a species is in- The list of “100 of the World’s precedented rate. A number of the troduced into an ecosystem where Worst Invasive Alien Species” in invasive alien species featured in it doesn’t occur naturally? Are eco- this booklet illustrates the incred- this booklet are contributing to systems flexible and able to cope ible variety of species that have the these losses.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Notes 193 APPLICATION of ALARM PHEROMONE TO
    Scientific Notes 193 APPLICATION OF ALARM PHEROMONE TO TARGETS BY SOUTHERN YELLOWJACKETS (HYMENOPTERA: VESPIDAE) HAL C. REED1 AND PETER J. LANDOLT USDA, ARS, 5230 Konnowac Pass Rd., Wapato, WA 98951, USA 1Current address: Department of Biology, Oral Roberts University, Tulsa, OK 74171 Alarm pheromones have been demonstrated for a number of species of social Vesp- idae including several hornets and yellowjackets (Vespines) (Landolt et al. 1997). Maschwitz (1964a, b) first demonstrated alarm pheromone responses in the yellow- jackets Vespula vulgaris L. and V. germanica (Fab.) in response to crushed wasps and body parts. Pheromone-mediated alarm has since been observed in other vespines: Dolichovespula saxonica (Fab.) (Maschwitz 1984), the southern yellowjacket V. squa- mosa (Drury) (Landolt & Heath 1987, Landolt et al. 1999), the eastern yellowjacket V. maculifrons (Buysson) (Landolt et al. 1995), Provespa anomala Saussure (Maschwitz & Hanel 1988), and Vespa crabro L. (Veith et al. 1984). 2-Methyl-3- butene-2-ol was identified as a component of the alarm pheromone of V. crabro (Veith et al. 1984), and N-3- methylbutylacetamide was isolated and identified as an alarm pheromone of the southern and eastern yellowjackets (Heath & Landolt 1988, Landolt et al. 1995). The source of alarm pheromones in social wasps generally is the venom, although the head is implicated as an additional source of alarm pheromone for V. vulgaris (Al- diss 1983) and V. squamosa (Landolt et al. 1999). Alarm behavior in V. germanica and V. vulgaris occurred in response to the squashed sting apparatus, sting sac, and sol- vent extract of the sting sac (Maschwitz 1964b) and in D.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoverflies: the Garden Mimics
    Article Hoverflies: the garden mimics. Edmunds, Malcolm Available at http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/1620/ Edmunds, Malcolm (2008) Hoverflies: the garden mimics. Biologist, 55 (4). pp. 202-207. ISSN 0006-3347 It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. For more information about UCLan’s research in this area go to http://www.uclan.ac.uk/researchgroups/ and search for <name of research Group>. For information about Research generally at UCLan please go to http://www.uclan.ac.uk/research/ All outputs in CLoK are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including Copyright law. Copyright, IPR and Moral Rights for the works on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the policies page. CLoK Central Lancashire online Knowledge www.clok.uclan.ac.uk Hoverflies: the garden mimics Mimicry offers protection from predators by convincing them that their target is not a juicy morsel after all. it happens in our backgardens too and the hoverfly is an expert at it. Malcolm overflies are probably the best the mimic for the model and do not attack Edmunds known members of tbe insect or- it (Edmunds, 1974). Mimicry is far more Hder Diptera after houseflies, blue widespread in the tropics than in temperate bottles and mosquitoes, but unlike these lands, but we have some of the most superb insects they are almost universally liked examples of mimicry in Britain, among the by the general public. They are popular hoverflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Detection and Replication of Moku Virus in Honey Bees and Social Wasps
    viruses Communication Detection and Replication of Moku Virus in Honey Bees and Social Wasps Andrea Highfield 1,*, Jessica Kevill 2,3, Gideon Mordecai 1,4 , Jade Hunt 1, Summer Henderson 1, Daniel Sauvard 5 , John Feltwell 6, Stephen J. Martin 2 , Seirian Sumner 7 and Declan C. Schroeder 1,3,8,* 1 The Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Citadel Hill, Plymouth PL1 2PB, UK; [email protected] (G.M.); [email protected] (J.H.); [email protected] (S.H.) 2 School of Environmental and Life Sciences, The University of Salford, Manchester M5 4WT, UK; [email protected] (J.K.); [email protected] (S.J.M.) 3 Veterinary Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, USA 4 Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada 5 INRAE UR633 Zoologie Forestière, 45075 Orléans, France; [email protected] 6 Wildlife Matters Consultancy Unit, Battle, East Sussex TN33 9BN, UK; [email protected] 7 Centre for Biodiversity and Environment Research, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK; [email protected] 8 School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6LA, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.H.); [email protected] (D.C.S.); Tel.: +1-612-413-0030 (D.C.S.) Received: 6 May 2020; Accepted: 26 May 2020; Published: 2 June 2020 Abstract: Transmission of honey bee viruses to other insects, and vice versa, has previously been reported and the true ecological importance of this phenomenon is still being realized.
    [Show full text]
  • Wasps: Australian Paper Wasp (Polistes Humilis), Asian Paper Wasp (Polistes Chinensis), Common Wasp (Vespula Vulgaris) and German Wasp (Vespula Germanica)
    Biosecurity series – animal factsheet Wasps: Australian paper wasp (Polistes humilis), Asian paper wasp (Polistes chinensis), common wasp (Vespula vulgaris) and German wasp (Vespula germanica) Advisory animal Eradication Progressive containment Sustained control Site-led Stop Australian, Asian, common and German wasps from damaging high value biodiversity sites. WHY WASPS ARE PESTS Production threat Environmental threat Public threat Four species of wasps in the Waikato region are considered pests, the Australian paper wasp, Asian paper wasp, common wasp and German wasp. German and common wasps pose the greatest risk to human health. They also attack beehives and prey on native insects. The common wasp IDENTIFYING FEATURES and the German wasp inhabit agricultural areas, native forests, planted Common and German wasps are slightly larger than forests, scrub/shrublands and urban areas where they nest underground honey bees, with distinctive black and yellow stripes. and in cavities in trees and buildings. Paper wasps are generally smaller with less yellow in Asian and Australian paper wasps are far less aggressive than German and their markings. common wasps, but they also prey on insects and chew weatherboards. The Asian paper wasp is larger than the Australian paper wasp. It Common and German wasps • Generally 12 to17mm long, although queens are arrived in New Zealand in the late 1970s and by 1995 was widespread larger. throughout the Upper North Island. It thrives in lowland open habitats such as shrublands, swamps and salt marshes but will often build nests on • Slightly bigger than a honey bee with smooth houses or other buildings as well as nesting in trees or bushes.
    [Show full text]
  • Honey-Buzzard
    Pernis apivorus 1. INTRODUCTION The honey-buzzard (European honey buzzard) was traditionally regarded as breeding mainly in southern and southwest England,Honey-buzzard but breeding pairs have been found increasingly in Wales, northern England and northeast Scotland (Gibbons et al., 1993; Murray, 1993; Roberts et al., 1999; Ogilvie, 2003; Ogilvie & RBBP, 2002, 2003, 2004). Breeding birds have not been recorded in Ireland. The breeding status of the species in Britain is poorly understood but it is believed to be expanding northwards and westwards. There are records of breeding for northern England and Scotland in the 1800s (Holloway, 1996), however, and it is possible that there has been irregular breeding and/or under-recording in these areas historically. British and mainland European honey-buzzards are long distance migrants that winter in tropical Africa (Toms, 2002a); some that breed in mainland Europe pass through Britain on passage. British birds have a short breeding season between their arrival in late April or May and departure from August onwards. The slightly smaller males can usually be distinguished by their greyer heads. Juveniles resemble females and are difficult to distinguish in the field. There is uncertainty about the age of first breeding. The majority of yearlings and some adults probably summer in Africa (Bijlsma, 1993; Forsman, 1999) although there is evidence that some juveniles return to Europe in the spring of their second calendar year (Panuccio & Agostini, 2006), and breeding at one year old has been reported
    [Show full text]
  • Climate-Induced Phenological Shifts in a Batesian Mimicry Complex
    Correction EVOLUTION Correction for “Climate-induced phenological shifts in a Batesian The authors note that Figure 3 appeared incorrectly. The mimicry complex,” by Christopher Hassall, Jac Billington, and corrected figure and its legend appear below. Thomas N. Sherratt, which was first published December 3, 2018; 10.1073/pnas.1813367115 (Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 116:929–933). CORRECTION Fig. 3. Trends in the number of high-fidelity model-mimic pairs in which (A) the model emerges first, (B) the mimic emerges first, and (C) emergence is random. Mimetic fidelity is derived from a large citizen science study, phenological trends are derived from >1 million biological records, and the three categories of emergence are defined using known fitness consequences from behavioral experiments. Shaded areas are 95% confidence intervals. Published under the PNAS license. Published online February 18, 2019. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1900966116 www.pnas.org PNAS | February 26, 2019 | vol. 116 | no. 9 | 3933 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 Climate-induced phenological shifts in a Batesian SEE COMMENTARY mimicry complex Christopher Hassalla,1, Jac Billingtonb, and Thomas N. Sherrattc aSchool of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, United Kingdom; bSchool of Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, LS2 9JT Leeds, United Kingdom; and cDepartment of Biology, Faculty of Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON K1S 5B6, Canada Edited by Carol Boggs, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Joan E. Strassmann November 1, 2018 (received for review August 2, 2018) Climate-induced changes in spatial and temporal occurrence of (11), and acoustic (12) cues that resemble those of stinging species, as well as species traits such as body size, each have the Hymenoptera.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invasion of Two Species of Social Wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) to the Faroe Islands
    BioInvasions Records (2019) Volume 8, Issue 3: 558–567 CORRECTED PROOF Rapid Communication The invasion of two species of social wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) to the Faroe Islands Sjúrður Hammer1,* and Jens-Kjeld Jensen2 1Environment Agency, FO-165, Argir, Faroe Islands 2Í Geilini 37, FO-270 Nólsoy, Faroe Islands Author e-mails: [email protected] (SH), [email protected] (JKJ) *Corresponding author Citation: Hammer S and Jensen J-K (2019) The invasion of two species of Abstract social wasps (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) to the Faroe Islands. BioInvasions Records Two species of social wasps have established in the Faroe Islands in 1999 – common 8(3): 558–567, https://doi.org/10.3391/bir. wasp Vespula vulgaris and German wasp Vespula germanica. The population 2019.8.3.11 growth, and dispersal in the Faroes has been followed in detail through Received: 9 January 2019 correspondence and contact with local residents and authorities throughout the Accepted: 10 June 2019 Faroes. Collected wasps have been identified, and nest eradication data from the Published: 12 August 2019 local municipalities is also presented. In total there have been 1.222 nests located and destroyed, mostly in Tórshavn, where they were first introduced, but nests have Handling editor: Tim Adriaens also been found on neighbouring islands. Both the introduction and the spread Thematic editor: Stelios Katsanevakis within the Faroes suggest a strong relationship with human settlements and travel. Copyright: © Hammer S and Jensen J-K Social wasps have established on four out of 18 islands – all of which are This is an open access article distributed under terms connected by land, suggesting that their spread within the islands is also human of the Creative Commons Attribution License (Attribution 4.0 International - CC BY 4.0).
    [Show full text]