The Map Is Not the Territory on the 10Th Anniversary of Google Maps a Dialog Between Paul D

Data Driven: The Map is Not the Territory On the 10th Anniversary of Google Maps A dialog between Paul D. Miller and Noel Gordon Data on the wall: Notations on a board made by Google Maps co-founder Noel Gordon as his start-up negotiated its sale to Google in 2004. Photo: Noel Gordon Introduction: Smartphones are seriously strange devices. They’ve disrupted almost everything that the 20th Cen- tury has bequeathed to us. TV, radio, maps, music, transportation methods, housing - they’ve all converged into one device that has taken over all other functions of our separate, silo like 20th century info habits. When you think about how much they’ve changed most of our basic habits, one of the most dominant aspects of smartphones is how they’ve reconfigured our sense of place and space. They’re emblems of how a kind of metonymy is working out in present time: they are reflections of the way physical space is becoming a function of a virtual and data driven digital domain. Think of it this way: we refigure public space in a new kind of architecture of the virtual - it’s kind of like remix- ing public space as an ideological platform of code versus culture. The purpose of physical spaces - rooms, roads, buildings - now depends less on where in the world the fixed place is, and what it was designed for, but more on what is being done with the screens that occupy the physical space, and how much they are being used to access other more virtual relationships. The tyranny of the Timeline: In 2015 something like over 1.5 billion people have used Google Maps. The data that billions of search queries has generated would encircle the Earth and probably a good deal of the solar system if you were to lay out all the different geographies the App has portrayed. In the world of search, your av- erage Googlemap query is based on a metaphor. How do we get from Point A to Point B. When you think of a modern map, there isn’t a better metaphor of how much things have changed in that sim- ple question than Google Maps. When people access the Internet with Apps on a phone rather than with a browser on a Pc or laptop, the whole experience is different. The Internet looks a lot less like a set of connected pages and more like a series of interfaces. It’s a kind of timeless time. Your activities play out in a way that exchanges things in parallel (your life with a timeline condensed into every moment you’ve sent a message or used a map link route). That fluidity fits with other ways the effects of the revolution in smartphone computing has changed personal computing: this is the post PC world, live in real time. Mechanical clocks allowed the days of the industrial revolution to standardized in new and novel ways: trains, planes, and cars changed the way people experienced landscape and extended new metaphors of geography into everyday life. Ditto with digital media. The printed book made human knowledge accessible in a way that no story could have ever been spoken, more easily built on, more layered and based on copies, more thoroughly examine lee, fixing it in bindings on shelves and archives. Today, it seems more and more that in its early, nascent phase, the smartphone has revolu- tionized knowledge in ways that are hard to really digest because they have happened so rapidly. The rise of the smartphone, while being drenched in every conceivable form of big data, still has an elusive and hard to quantify quality of disruption of norms. This is the new map, the new topology of our contemporary world of infinite numeracy. This is where we look at new maps in exchange for old territories. And that’s what the interview with Noel Gordon focuses on. Maps are one of the primary windows into the new cartographic realms of digital 21st century culture. They, like floor charts of several cen- turies before really come into a new kind of coded terrain. They tell us simply, as the engineer, philos- opher, and mathematician Alford Korzybski once said: The map is not the territory. Known as the father of general semantics, Alford Korzybski once opined “A map is not the territory it represents, but if correct, it has a similar structure to the territory, which accounts for its usefulness”. Basically this means that our perception of reality is not reality itself but our own version, our own protection of it, or our “map” is a logic structured on the way we put the variables of personal experience together. The overall way we look at the landscape around us has never been more immediately accessible than through the Apps we use to access the data around us. Paul D Miller: So, I’m here at Google’s headquarters in Sydney Australia with an incredible but also intriguingly elusive character named Noel Gordon who as most people know is one of the co-inven- tors on Google Maps. So Noel, one thing I’ve always wanted to ask you is what is your first impression of a map? Noel Gordon: I think my first impression of what a map is, it’s just something that gives us our sense of place. The maps we invented were a digital version of things humans had already invented... paper maps for example. A map tells us where we are, where we’re going, and how long it’s going to take. A map is very utilitarian, at least that was the approach we took when building maps. We assumed users would want to know where they are, and how that fits into the story of place nearby, and they wanted to know that on desktops originally, but now on mobile phones as well. PM: So, when we were talking earlier, one of the things you mentioned was some of the history of maps, like earlier Babylonian ideas of using etchings and, of course, Aboriginal Australian art which is actually much older. Do you want to riff on those two examples? NG: I think in the case of Aboriginal art, the pictorial representations of something, an animal or animal spirit that they would draw on cave walls, were connected with their environment, to their land, to depict things physically there, such as a watering hole, a place of meeting, or a place of spiritual importance to the people. They used mapping, this pictorial mapping drawn on cave walls, that on later analysis turns out to be exactly correlated with the physical landscape in which they lived, and I think that’s fascinating. The Babylonians are another example of a people who understood the importance of place. They etched their location relative to other points on the landscape on clay tablets [1], which they ex- changed for goods or to help others navigate the landscape. This pressing human need for knowing where we are at all times has been with us forever... and maps help provide that sense of place, and simply and elegantly solve the where-am-I problem. PM: From my point of view with Google Maps, we’re now on the 10th anniversary... NG: Yeah. (smiles). PM: And it’s really radically changed people’s sense of place. Most people refer to Google Maps as a kind of real-time reference point, a frame of reference that allows them to navigate and be able to arrive from point A to point B. But you come from a really eclectic background. One of the things that we were talking about earlier was you had initially been working on machines for cutting fabric when you left San Francisco. Tell us a little bit of the story of that. NG: San Francisco… that was the Tech Wreck. I was working as an engineer, I’m an electrical engineer by training, in a company in Freemont, where I first meet Lars and Jens (Rasmussen) incidental- ly, and I was made redundant. I could recommend that to young people as one of the best things that can happen in your life... PM: Your job getting outsourced or whatever? NG: Yeah, because you then tend to have to refocus your life, strip the unnecessary, and maybe real- ize that the best experiences in life come from doing whatever is put in front of you. No good sitting on the couch at home waiting for someone to offer you a job. Better to get out there and try whatever comes your way. There was no work in my field at the time. I started over in a job unrelated to my training, in a fabric cutting business, doing bulk manufacture of women’s clothing, and at the lowest rung you could possibly start - sweeping the factory floor - and I worked up from there. My future father-in-law had bought a new machine for his cutting factory. It was a very expensive machine, it was all comput- er-driven and he asked, “Noel, you understand computers, come down and teach my people how to use this machine and make it work for me.” And what a wonderful experience that was. I was trained in quantum physics and maths. I knew zip about cutting fabric. But I learned how to do it. Because he works for himself, and it was the first time I ever worked in a family business, I began to listen and learn about running a business.

Load more