CB 6 2019 Appex-12-22-1.Pdf

GSI Event Study

IFF Men’s World Floorball

Championships 2018

1 December – 9 December 2018

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

GSI Event Study IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Prague, Czech Republic

This Event Study is subject to copyright agreements. No part of this Event Study PUBLISHED APRIL 2019 may be reproduced distributed or transmitted in any form or by any means BY SPORTCAL GLOBAL or stored in any retrieval system of any nature without prior written permission. COMMUNICATIONS LTD Application for permission for use of copyright material shall be made to Sportcal Global Communications Ltd (“Sportcal”).

Sportcal has prepared this Event Study using reasonable skill, care and diligence Authors for the sole and confidential use of the International Floorball Federation (“IFF”) for the purposes set out in the Event Study. Sportcal does not assume or accept Ezechiel Abatan, Krzysztof Kropielnicki or owe any responsibility or duty of care to any other person. Any use that a third party makes of this Event Study or reliance thereon or any decision made based on it, is the responsibility of such third party. Research and editorial support

The Event Study reflects Sportcal’s best judgement in the light of the information Andrew Horsewood, Tim Rollason, Colin available at the time of its preparation. Sportcal has relied upon the completeness, Stewart accuracy and fair presentation of all the information, data, advice, opinion or representations (the “Information”) obtained from public sources and from IFF, Czech Floorball and various third-party providers. The findings in the Event Study Market research are conditional upon such completeness, accuracy and fair presentation of the Information. Sportcal, Sportcal India, Meltwater

Images provided by IFF and Czech Floorball.

Image credits

Data provided by: IFF, Czech Floorball

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

GSI Event Study / IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Contents

1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4

2 OVERVIEW 6

3 STAKEHOLDERS 13

4 ECONOMIC 17

5 TOURISM 21

6 EVENT EXPERIENCE 28

7 MEDIA 34

8 SOCIAL MEDIA 43

9 SPONSORSHIP 53

10 SPORTING 60

11 SOCIAL 64

12 LEGACY 71

13 COMPARATIVE DATA ANALYSIS 74

Summary Executive

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Executive Summary IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018

Date City, Nation Key statistics 1-9 December 2018 Prague, Czech Republic ECONOMIC Venues Organiser Attendance 181,518

O2 arena Czech Floorball / Prague 2018 Tickets distributed* 88,589 Arena Sparta Organising Committee Tickets sold 47,163 Complimentary tickets 41,426 Event Frequency Owner Direct economic impact €7.76m Every two years International Floorball Federation Bed nights (spectators) 41,510 *tickets were valid for multiple games

Prague, Czech Republic, hosted the IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 TOURISM (referred to throughout the study as ‘Prague 2018’) between 1 December and 9 Origin of spectators December 2018. Prague & Central Bohemia 34% It was the third time the Czech Republic had hosted the men’s world Other Czech Republic 40% championships. Overseas 25%

The total attendance amounted to 181,518, with the event breaking all previous EVENT EXPERIENCE attendance records for the floorball world championships. A total of 88,589 tickets Positive experience were distributed, of which 53 per cent – or 47,163 – were sold tickets. Spectators 99% The vast majority of spectators (75 per cent) were from the Czech Republic, including 21 per cent coming from Prague. As much as 98.8 per cent of spectators MEDIA had a positive experience attending the event. TV broadcasters 32 The direct economic impact of the event has been estimated at CZK 201 million TV nations 17 (€7.76 million). The world championships generated an estimated 41,510 TV broadcast hours 322:03:25 spectator bed nights. Accredited media 212

Prague 2018 was shown by 32 TV broadcasters across three continents, SOCIAL MEDIA generating over 322 broadcast hours and a cumulative TV audience of 8.1 million. Posts 1,408 A total of 212 members of accredited media covered the event. Reactions / Likes 419,612 During the event period, the IFF and Prague 2018 social media pages generated New followers 8,154 a combined 419,612 likes and 8,154 new followers. SPONSORSHIP The event was supported by a total of 25 partners, including four IFF partners. The Number of partners 25 brand most commonly associated with the event was Holba, with a prompted brand awareness of 69 per cent among surveyed spectators. SPORTING In total, 325 athletes representing 16 nations and four continents took part in the Athletes 325 event, and were accompanied by 129 team officials and 24 technical officials. Officials 153 Team officials 129 The delivery of the event was supported by 378 volunteers. A rich social Technical officials 24 programme was built around the world championships including Prague 2018 Competing nations 16 fanzones, the Street Floorball League and a major schools programme that engaged 22,258 children and youth from across the Czech Republic. SOCIAL Volunteers 378

Overview

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Overview Event History

Prague 2018 was the 12th edition of the IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships. Editions hosted by nation (1996-2022) Stockholm, Sweden was the host of the first edition of the event in 1996. Czech Republic 3 Europe is the only continent to have hosted floorball’s flagship men’s event. Sweden 3 Sweden and the Czech Republic have hosted the world championships three Finland 2 times. The event has been held in Finland and Switzerland twice, but both nations Switzerland 2 will host it again in the coming years, with Helsinki and Zurich being awarded the Latvia 1 2020 and the 2022 edition, respectively. Norway 1 The hosting rights to the 2022 world championships were awarded at the General Assembly during Prague 2018.

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships hosts (1996-2018)

YEAR CITY NATION CONTINENT Stockholm, Skellefteå 1996 Sweden Europe & Uppsala 1998 Prague & Brno Czech Republic Europe Drammen, Oslo 2000 Norway Europe & Sarpsborg 2002 Helsinki Finland Europe 2004 Zurich & Kloten Switzerland Europe Stockholm, Helsingborg 2006 Sweden Europe & Malmö 2008 Ostrava & Prague Czech Republic Europe 2010 Helsinki & Vantaa Finland Europe 2012 Bern & Zurich Switzerland Europe 2014 Gothenburg Sweden Europe 2016 Riga Latvia Europe 2018 Prague Czech Republic Europe

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Overview Event Format

The biennial IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships bring together the 16 world’s best male teams to compete for the world championship title.

The 2018 event in Prague was a nine-day competition. The group stage took place during the first four days of the event.

The 16 teams were split into four groups, with the top eight nations, according to the IFF ranking, being placed in Groups A and B, and the lower ranked nations in Groups C and D.

The top two teams from Groups A and B automatically advanced to the quarterfinals. The third- and fourth-placed teams in Groups A and B and the top two teams from Groups C and D faced each other for a place in the quarter-finals.

Nations which did not progress through the group stage, play-off round or quarter-finals took part in the placement round to decide the final rankings (5th- 16th place).

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 competition schedule

DATE STAGE 1st Dec – 4th Dec Group stage

5th Dec Play-off round 6th Dec – 9th Dec Placement round 6th Dec – 7th Dec Quarterfinals 8th Dec Semi-finals 9th Dec Bronze medal match 9th Dec Gold medal match

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Overview Previous Edition IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2016

Date City, Nation Key statistics 3-11 December 2016 Riga, Latvia ECONOMIC Venues Organiser Total attendance 85,110 Arēna Rīga Latvian Floorball Union Ticketed attendance 75,196 Olympic Sports Centre Elektrum Non-ticketed attendance 9,914 Tickets available 63,110 World Floorball Championship 2016 (Riga 2016) was held in two venues with Tickets sold 32,543 a combined venue capacity of 11,300 in Riga, Latvia. MEDIA In total 32,543 tickets were sold for the competition, from a total of 63,110 TV nations 22 available. Across the nine competition days, the total attendance was 85,110. Broadcasters 24 Riga 2016 generated an estimated 36,215 bed nights to the Riga economy from Accredited media 333

6,350 visitors. SPORTING The event was contested by 320 athletes from 16 competing nations, representing Athletes 320 four continents. Officials 205 There were 205 officials in Riga for the competition. A further 363 volunteers Competing nations 16 assisted the running of the event, including 20 from overseas. SOCIAL A total of 24 broadcasters showed some coverage of Riga 2016, reaching Volunteers 363 a potential 22 nations, across four continents. Worldwide coverage was ensured through internet streaming via YouTube and the Olympic Channel.

Across social media, Instagram was the most-used platform. During the event period, the Riga 2016 and IFF Instagram pages combined to average 21,438 likes and 230 comments per day.

The event was supported by 26 private and public partners.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Overview Host Profile Czech Republic

Key facts

Size 78,866 km2 Population 10,561,630 (2016) GDP(PPP) €29,815 (2016) Capital Prague

th GSI Nations Index* 24 (2019)

In recent years, the Czech Republic has hosted a multitude of world championships, * GSI Nations Index is Sportcal’s proprietary ranging from canoeing and cycling to floorball and ice hockey. index which analyses the hosting and bidding of major sports events and ranks nations by the In the coming years, the country will host world championships in orienteering, cumulative score of the events that nation has hosted. softball and rowing. More information on GSI Nations Index As of 2019, Czech Republic sits in 24th position in Sportcal’s Global Sports Impact www.sportcal.com/GSI

(GSI) Nations Index.

Selected events hosted in Czech Republic (2013-2022)

YEAR SPORT EVENT CITY 2013 Canoeing ICF Canoe Slalom World Championships Prague IFF Women’s World Floorball 2013 Floorball Various Championships 2014 Ski jumping FIS Ski Flying World Championships 2014 Harrachov 2015 Cycling UCI Cyclo-Cross World Championships Tábor 2015 Ice hockey IIHF World Championships Various UCI Mountain Bike & Trials World Nové Město na 2016 Cycling Championships Moravě 2017 Canoeing ICF Canoe Sprint World Championships Račice 2018 Floorball IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships Prague WBSC Men’s Softball World 2019 Softball Various Championships 2021 Orienteering World Orienteering Championships Mladá Boleslav 2022 Rowing World Rowing Championships Račice

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Overview Host Profile Prague

Key facts

Size 496 km2 Population 1,294,513

GSI Cities Index* 36th (2019)

* GSI Cities Index is Sportcal’s proprietary index which analyses the hosting and bidding of major sports events and ranks cities by the cumulative Prague is the capital of the Czech Republic and the largest city in the country, with score of the events that city has hosted. a population of 1.3 million people. More information on GSI Cities Index Prague was one the host cities for ice hockey’s IIHF World Championships 2015 www.sportcal.com/GSI and basketball’s EuroBasket 2017.

In recent years Prague has also hosted the Fed Cup World Group Final in 2014, 2015 and 2018.

In 2019 the WBSC Men’s Softball World Championships will be held in Prague.

Selected events hosted in Prague (2013-2019)

YEAR SPORT EVENT CITY 2013 Basketball FIBA U19 World Championship for Men Prague 2013 Canoeing ICF Canoe Slalom World Championships Prague 2013 Soccer UEFA Super Cup Prague Women's EuroHockey Indoor Nations 2014 Field hockey Prague Championship 2015 Athletics European Athletics Indoor Championships Prague 2015 Ice hockey IIHF World Championships Various 2017 Basketball EuroBasket Women Various 2018 Floorball IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships Prague WBSC Men’s Softball World 2019 Softball Various Championships

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Overview Venues

The matches during the IFF Men’s World Championships 2018 were played in two O2 arena venues: the O2 arena and Arena Sparta. Venue type Multi-purpose The O2 arena, built in 2004, is a multi-purpose facility that hosts major sports and Constructed 2004 cultural events attended every year by over 600,000 people. Capacity (Prague 2018) 17,000 The arena was the main competition venue for Prague 2018 and hosted 26 matches during the nine days of the world championships. The venue was also used the previous time Czech Republic hosted the event. However, only the semi- Arena Sparta finals and the gold and bronze medal matches were played in the arena in 2008. Venue type Sports venue Arena Sparta, owned by the city of Prague and operated by AC Sparta Prague, Constructed 2008 the local sports club, was the secondary competition venue. The arena, with the Capacity (Prague 2018) 1,300 capacity of 1,300, is located less than one kilometre away from the O2 arena. It hosted 22 matches during Prague 2018. Total matches per venue

O2 arena 26 Arena Sparta 22

takeholders

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Stakeholders International Floorball Federation

Founded in 1986, the International Floorball Federation (IFF) is the world’s Key objectives governing body for the sport of floorball. It oversees the organisation of major floorball events, including the biennial world championships for men and women. • Help local organisers to plan and deliver the biggest floorball event Czech Republic is one of the strongest floorball nations and an experienced ever organiser of major floorball events. It was believed that local organisers were able to turn Prague 2018 into the most successful floorball event ever and IFF was • Leverage the success of the event looking to use it as a platform for the advancement of the sport across three pillars: to strengthen the relationships 1) politics and lobbying, 2) media and marketing and 3) competition and sport with the sport community and development. public authorities

The first of the pillars was about using the event as a case study to showcase • Showcase the sport at its best to decision-makers, in particular from the sport movement and public authorities, and increase its visibility for fans, what floorball is capable of delivering from an organisational, commercial and broadcasters and sponsors sporting perspective. In recent years, this strategy has allowed floorball to be re- admitted into the programme of The World Games in 2017 (following a 20-year • Continue the global absence) and the Southeast Asian Games in 2019 (after a two-year hiatus), as well development of the sport as be included in the programme of the European Masters Games 2019. In the long run, floorball’s inclusion in these multisport events might help the sport to become part of the Olympic Games. At the domestic level, being able to demonstrate the potential of floorball and the success of the sport’s flagship INTERVIEWS event can help national member associations to join national Olympic committees and domestic sports confederations and strengthens the position of floorball Tomas Eriksson executives in elections for senior roles within the sports community. President International Floorball Federation The media and marketing objective was based on the commercial strength of the sport in the Czech Republic. By televising a record-breaking number of matches John Liljelund from the event, Czech TV, the domestic public-service broadcaster, contributed Secretary General to improving the visibility of floorball in one of the core markets for the sport. In International Floorball Federation addition, all matches from the world championships were streamed live on the IFF YouTube channels, while the Olympic Channel broadcast live a total of 22 games. The online broadcasts played a key role in reaching out to fans outside floorball’s traditional nations. New attendance records and the enthusiasm of domestic and overseas fans in the stands demonstrated the power of floorball and the benefits that can be derived by sponsors wishing to be associated with the sport, according to IFF.

In terms of sport development, IFF and the organising committee held a referee observer seminar, a coaching conference, management workshops for less experienced member federations, as well as the General Assembly during the event in Prague. For the sport the main challenges now are to build a stronger relationship with commercial partners to build a stable financial foundation for floorball internationally (e.g. to support the development of the infrastructure and the purchase of equipment), as well as to further promote the universal appeal of floorball by hosting major tournaments in the Americas and Asia and by welcoming the first African and South American nations to the world championships.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Stakeholders Czech Floorball & Prague 2018 Organising Committee

Czech Floorball was awarded the hosting rights for the IFF Men’s World Floorball Key objectives Championships 2018 in 2014. The main objective for the organisers was to redefine the status of floorball in the country. • Better previous attendance records for men’s world It was the third time that the event had been held in the Czech Republic. Brno and championships Prague were the host cities of the first world championships organised in the Czech Republic in 1998, while Ostrava and Prague hosted the seventh edition • Redefine the status of the sport, of the event in 2008. The 10-year span between the world championships allowed generate pride in the floorball Czech Floorball to monitor the impact the event had on the development of the community and involve local sport both domestically and internationally. clubs and their members

In 2008 Czech Floorball decided to stage the final two days of the tournament • Showcase the development, in the O2 arena in Prague, one of the largest indoor venues in Europe. The arena maturity and social value became the main competition venue of the 2018 world championships and hosted of floorball to local authorities more than half of all matches during the nine-day event. Filling the 17,000- capacity venue was a challenge for the local organisers who set an ambitious goal • Grow the commercial value of breaking the attendance records for a floorball event, a single day of the of floorball and capture the competition and a single match, all of which were achieved at the end of the 2018 interest of corporate brands world championships.

However, the main focus of Czech Floorball was to ensure that the success of the event translated into long-term benefits for the sport and was a source of pride INTERVIEWS for the floorball community. The world championships were also a platform to reach many people that were not involved in floorball and that may be Filip Šuman impossible to reach otherwise, and to demonstrate the potential of floorball, President according to Filip Suman, Czech Floorball president. Czech Floorball

Floorball is a sport with the second highest number of registered players in the Zuzana Svobodová Czech Republic (after football). The strategy of the local organisers was to engage Secretary General this core group (floorball players, their families and friends) first before reaching Prague 2018 Organising Committee out to a wider audience, in particular casual sports fans that would be attracted by the fact that a major sports event was taking place on their home soil. The federation worked closely with the local clubs and opened a special ticket booking window for the floorball community before the start of the public sale.

The event’s multichannel communications campaign was executed via social media, outdoor advertising and promotional activities during league and national team games. It was supported by Czech Television, the national public-service broadcaster. The event was also promoted internationally, with a visible branding of Prague 2018 at the men’s world championships in Riga, Latvia in 2016 and the women’s world championships in Bratislava, Slovakia in 2017.

Additionally, the Street Floorball League was launched during the summer of 2018 to keep the interest in the sport alive during what is usually a ‘dead season’ for floorball (the domestic league season runs from September until April) and to spread the message about the world championships. The initiative consisted of 12 outdoor events organised in major cities across the Czech Republic between

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

An important objective of Czech Floorball was to demonstrate the value of the sport to authorities at the national and local level. The federation launched the fanzones project, encouraging floorball clubs to set up public viewing areas for the final stages of the world championships and co-funding the build of the fanzones. Moreover, the mayors of all Czech cities with a population of over 10,000 inhabitants were invited to the opening day of the world championships and to experience the sport at its best. Around 50 mayors attended and many of them saw a floorball match live for the first time. It was believed that these initiatives would help the clubs to generate more interest in the sport from local authorities.

One of the challenges for the organisers was to secure the funding from the public and private sector. Income from ticketing was the key item in the event budget which was a risk from a financial perspective as ticket sales were expected to depend on the performance of the Czech national team. It was also uncertain how much public funding the event would receive considering that floorball is not an Olympic sport and that the municipal elections affected the political situation in the city of Prague.

However, in the end Czech Floorball received funding worth 31.1 million Czech crowns (€1.2 million) from the city and the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport of the Czech Republic, while the sponsorship revenue achieved was double that of initial projections. To ensure the commercial legacy, the organisers invited over 100 major Czech companies to experience the event, with 84 of them (including the current partners of Czech Floorball) attending the world championships.

Economic

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Economic Attendance Overview

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 broke all previous attendance Attendance - Overview records for a floorball event. The attendance in Prague totalled 181,518 which is over 77,000 more than in Gothenburg in 2014 where the previous record was set. Attendance 181,518 Prague 2018 also recorded the highest ever attendance on the opening day of the Tickets available 115,325 world championships (31,073) and for a single match during the event (16,276 Tickets distributed 88,589 spectators attended the final between Finland and Sweden). Tickets sold 47,163 Complimentary tickets 41,426 There were 115,325 tickets available for the event, of which, 88,589 were distributed. Ticket sales amounted to 47,163 while the remaining 41,426 were distributed as complimentary tickets. The event had an average daily attendance Attendance breakdown by day of 20,169, with the highest attendance (36,856) registered on the final day of the tournament. Sat 1 December 31,073 Sun 2 December 12,727 Apart from the final, the Czech Republic matches were the best attended Mon 3 December 16,521 by spectators. The host nation’s 3rd place match against Switzerland attracted Tue 4 December 23,483 16,112 fans to the O2 arena, while the semi-final, in which Czech Republic lost to Finland, was attended by 12,811 spectators. Wed 5 December 11,729 Thu 6 December 11,161 Fri 7 December 10,422 Sat 8 December 27,546 IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships attendance, 2012-2018 Sun 9 December 36,856 AVERAGE PER DAY 20,169 200,000 181,518 180,000 Most attended matches – Top 5 160,000 140,000 Finland – Sweden 16,276 (final) 120,000 104,445 Czech Republic – 100,000 16,112 85,110 Switzerland (3rd place) 75,178 80,000 Czech Republic – Finland 12,811 60,000 (semi-final) Germany – Czech Republic 40,000 12,326 (group match) 20,000 Sweden – Switzerland 10,267 0 (semi-final) 2012 (Bern / Zurich) 2014 (Gothenburg) 2016 (Riga) 2018 (Prague)

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Economic Attendance Ticketing

The pricing strategy for tickets sales was agreed in November 2017. One of the Distribution of tickets objectives of the organisers was to give all domestic fans an opportunity to attend at least one game of the Czech national team by introducing different price Tickets distributed 88,589 categories and making sure that fans could afford to buy a ticket to the host nation’s Online 25,598 match. Ticketportal POS 5,721 The public sale launched in March 2018, but all members of Czech Floorball could At the gate 4,569 purchase tickets to selected competition days (during which the Czech national Czech Floorball 45,779 team was expected to play) before the general public. The distribution of tickets VIP tickets 6,922 was handled online and in authorised points of sale by Ticketportal, the international ticketing operator. Group orders were managed by partner travel agencies, while some tickets were distributed by Czech Floorball directly. INTERVIEW There were four categories of tickets for matches played in the O2 arena (fans could also purchase an additional upgrade giving them access to the VIP area) Radka Bařtipánová and a single type of ticket for games held in Arena Sparta, with no allocated seats. Head of Ticketing Spectators were granted access to all matches scheduled in the respective venue Prague 2018 Organising Committee on the specific day(s) their tickets were applicable for. However, tickets for matches contested in the O2 arena were also valid for games in Arena Sparta in order to maximise audiences at each match.

The prices of a standard ticket ranged from €6 to €38 in the group stage (a four- day pass enabling access to all group matches was priced at between €36 and €88), from €4 to €12 for the play-off round and the placement matches and from €16 to €70 for the quarterfinals, semi-finals, bronze medal match and the final.

Prague 2018 ticket prices

CAT. I CAT. I CAT. III CAT. IV VIP ARENA UPGRADE (O2 arena) (O2 arena) (O2 arena) (O2 arena) SPARTA (O2 arena) Group stage

Sat 1 Dec €38 €28 €20 €14 +€70 €8

Sun 2 Dec €38 €28 €20 €14 +€70 €8

Mon 3 Dec €12 €8 (morning) Mon 3 Dec €14 €12 €6 (afternoon) Tue 4 Dec €12 €8 (morning) Tue 4 Dec €32 €24 €6 (afternoon) Sat 1 Dec – Tue 4 €88 €64 €44 €36 +€65 Dec Play-off round

Wed 5 Dec €12 €8 €6 Quarterfinals (O2 arena) / Placement matches (Arena Sparta) Thu 6 Dec €38 €28 €16 +€65 €6 Fri 7 Dec €38 €28 €16 +€65 €6

Semi-finals (O2 arena) / Placement matches (Arena Sparta)

Sat 8 Dec €60 €38 €30 €22 +€70 €4

rd Final & 3 place (O2 arena) / Placement matches (Arena Sparta)

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Economic Direct Economic Impact

The economic impact is calculated using local organisational spend and direct Direct economic impact visitor spend generated as a result of Prague hosting the event. These impacts are to come from outside the host city, either from overseas or other parts of the Czech Total €7.76m Republic. Surplus LOC spend €0.89m Spectator tourism spend €5.96m Other visitor spend €0.91m ORGANISER SPEND

Based on analysis of expenditure and revenues, it is estimated that there was an organiser surplus spend of CZK 23.13 million (€0.89 million) for the local economy.

TOURISM SPEND

An estimated CZK 154 million (€5.96 million) of tourism spend was generated by visiting spectators, while other visitor spend, including the expenditure of accredited persons, amounted to CZK 23.49 million (€0.91 million).

TOTAL DIRECT ECONOMIC IMPACT

The total direct economic impact of the IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 is estimated to be CZK 201 million (€7.76 million), based on a direct tourism spend of CZK 178 million (€6.87 million) and an event organiser surplus spend of CZK 23.13 million (€0.89 million).

Tourism

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Tourism Overview

The analysis in this section looks at the tourism impact generated by spectators who Methodology attended the IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018. The tourism study was conducted A tourism survey was used to assess the spectator tourism impact, from which the in December 2018 by Sportcal, answers by respondents were analysed and extrapolated. Spectators were in collaboration with the organising categorised into different groups, based on their place of origin. committee. The results of the survey suggest that there were 45,055 unique attendees The process consisted of short at Prague 2018, of which 35,444 (i.e. 79 per cent) were visiting spectators. intercept surveys at the event, Overseas spectators accounted for 25 per cent of all fans. followed by a more extensive online On average visiting spectators spent three nights in Prague while attending the survey. event. 326 people completed the online The total spectator spend amounted to CZK 160 million (€6.2 million), of which survey. CZK 154 million (€5.96 million) can be attributed to visiting spectators.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Tourism Spectator Survey Demographic Profile and Origin

Origin of spectators

• 75 per cent of all spectators came from the Czech Republic • There was a strong contingent of Czech fans coming from outside Prague and accounting for 53 per cent of all spectators

Prague 21%

Central Bohemia 13%

Czech Republic (outside Prague & 40% Central Bohemia)

Overseas 25%

Age and gender profile of spectators

• The spectator demographics had a strong skew towards males • Age is concentrated at the lower end of the scale with 73 per cent of all spectators being under the age of 45

Note: Spectators under the age of 16 were excluded from taking part in the survey and as a result are not accounted for in the analysis

16-24 20%

25-34 16% 26%

35-44 37%

45-54 22%

74% 55-64 4%

65+ 1% Male Female 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Tourism Spectator Survey Attendance

No. of people attended with

• 94 per cent of spectators attended with at least one other person • Almost 50 per cent of fans attended in the group of two or three

6% 15% Alone

Group of 2 11% 30% Group of 3

Group of 4

Group of 5-6

20% Group of >6

18%

With whom did spectators attend Prague 2018?

• Spectators were most likely to attend with children and other family members, highlighting the appeal of the event to families

Children aged under 16 53%

Friends 33%

Other family members 29%

Spouse/Partner 28%

Members of my sports club 17%

School 4%

Colleagues 4%

Other 2%

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Tourism Spectator Survey Accommodation

Where did spectators stay during Prague 2018?

• A high proportion of spectators commuted to attend the event • However, 24 per cent of all spectators stayed in paid accommodation in Prague

I commuted between Prague and my 57% home town each day

I stayed in paid accommodation in 24% Prague

I stayed with friends / family in 8% Prague

I stayed with friends / family outside 2% of Prague

Other 9%

Type of accommodation

• 83 per cent of visitors who were in paid accommodation in Prague stayed in a hotel or a rented apartment

4% 14% Hotel

Rented private house / apartment / Airbnb 51% Guest house / Bed & breakfast 32% Other

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Tourism Spectator Survey Accommodation

Number of nights in Prague

• 56 per cent of visitors stayed in Prague for one or two nights • 13 per cent stayed for five or more nights

13%

28% 5+ nights

16% 4 nights 3 nights 2 nights 1 night 16% 28%

Average number of nights spent in Prague during the event

• The average stay for a visiting spectator was just under three nights, rising to four nights amongst those who were visitors from overseas

From the Czech Republic 1.97

Overseas 4.00

Average 2.96

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Tourism Spectator Spend Total Spend

Unique attendance

Based on the attendance figures and the ticketing data the Czech Republic amounted to 24,019, while there were available, it is estimated that 45,055 unique individuals an estimated 11,426 overseas visitors. attended the IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018.

From the estimated unique attendance of 45,055, the number of visiting spectators totalled 35,444. Visiting spectators from

Total spectator spend at Prague 2018

Estimates based on the tourism study show a gross spend million), while overseas visitors contributed CZK 114 million by spectators related to the IFF Men’s World Floorball (€4.39 million). Championships 2018 of CZK 160 million (€6.2 million), Visiting spectators generated 41,510 nights in Prague. of which CZK 6.28 million (€0.24 million), i.e. 3.9 per cent, was spent by spectators coming from Prague. The analysis excludes spectator spend on tickets as this spend was captured within the organising committee’s financial Of the total spend by visitors to Prague, visiting spectators budget. from the Czech Republic spent CZK 40.45 million (€1.56

VISITORS TOTAL PRAGUE CENTRAL REST OF CZECH OVERSEAS BOHEMIA REPUBLIC No. of people attended 40,555 9,610 5,907 18,112 11,426 TOTAL SPEND (CZK) CZK 160,466,812 CZK 6,284,633 CZK 5,964,058 CZK 34,490,344 CZK 113,727,777 SPEND PER SPECTATOR (CZK) CZK 3,562 CZK 654 CZK 1,010 CZK 1,904 CZK 9,954 TOTAL SPEND (EUR) EUR 6,200,438 EUR 242,838 EUR 230,451 EUR 1,332,707 EUR 4,394,441 SPEND PER SPECTATOR (EUR) EUR 138 EUR 25 EUR 39 EUR 74 EUR 385 Exchange rate used CZK 1 = EUR 0.03864 throughout study

Breakdown of spectator spend by category

VENUE PRAGUE

5% 6%

34% 44% 30% 58%

22%

Eating & drinking Accommodation Eating & drinking Transport & parking Transport & parking Other spend Other spend

Experience Event

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Event Experience Overview

The IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 event experience survey Methodology showed that 98.8 per cent of spectators had a positive experience attending the event. The event experience study was conducted in December 2018

by Sportcal, in collaboration with the KEY FINDINGS organising committee.

• 74 per cent of respondents said that Prague 2018 was better than other Respondents were asked to assess similar events they have attended their experience of different • 94 per cent of respondents liked Prague. 90 per cent of spectators declared organisational areas of Prague 2018 that they are planning to return to the city in the next two years and score them appropriately. • Respondents gave a high rating to almost all organisational aspects of the A rating of 1 (very poor or very event unlikely) to 5 (very good or very likely) • However, the food and drink options available to spectators in the venue, was used to establish the GSI Rating including quality and price, were rated lower of the event.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Event Experience Event Organisation and Venue

Prague 2018 satisfaction ratings – Event organisation and venue

• The organisation of the event and the venues received universally high ratings from spectators • The satisfaction ratings below reflect the percentage of spectators that rated the different organisational areas as good or very good

Atmosphere during the competition 96%

Marketing and promotion of the event 93%

Ease of getting to/leaving the venue (public 92% transport/parking/taxi/bike/walk)

Ease of getting information about the event 91%

View of the event from your seat 90%

Ease of booking tickets 89%

Helpfulness of staff/volunteers 88%

Toilet facilities 87%

Information/announcements at the venue 87%

Signage around the event 84%

Entertainment at the venue 83%

Efficiency of access into the venue (queuing, bag searching) 80%

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Event Experience Host City

How would you rate Prague as a place to visit?

• 94 per cent of spectators rated Prague Very good 60% as a place to visit Good 34%

Neither good nor poor 6%

Poor 0%

Very poor 0%

How likely would you be to visit Prague again in the next couple of years?

• Almost 90 per cent of visiting spectators 5 – Very Likely 72% stated that they are likely to revisit Prague in the next two years 4 – Likely 17%

3 – Neither likely nor unlikely 4%

2 – Unlikely 0%

1 – Very unlikely 7%

How likely would you be to recommend Prague to another person?

• 87 per cent of spectators would recommend Prague to another person 5 – Very Likely 52%

4 – Likely 35%

3 – Neither likely nor unlikely 10%

2 – Unlikely 1%

1 – Very unlikely 3%

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Event Experience Overall Experience

Generally, how would you rate your experience at this event compared to other similar events you have attended?

• For almost three in four spectators Prague 2018 was the best event or better than most other similar events attended 5% It was the best event I have 19% attended 21% It was better than most other events I have attended It was better than some events and worse than others I have not attended any

55% similar events

How would you rate the overall event experience you had during your visit to Prague 2018?

• Almost 99 per cent of spectators had a positive experience at Prague 2018 5 – Very good 80.4%

4 – Good 18.4%

3 – Neither good nor poor 0.6%

2 – Poor 0.3%

1 – Very poor 0.3%

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Event Experience GSI Ratings

GSI Ratings in full

In the tables below the event experience scores of Prague 2018 are benchmarked against the average GSI Rating, calculated based on the surveys Sportcal conducted at eleven other major sporting events (world championships and multisport games) in 2017 and 2018.

EVENT SATISFACTON

PRAGUE 2018 AVERAGE GSI DIFFERENCE RATING RATING EVENT ORGANISATION AND VENUE Atmosphere during the competition 4.74 4.52 +0.22 Ease of getting to/leaving the venue (public 4.56 4.09 +0.47 transport/parking/taxi/bike/walk) Ease of booking tickets 4.54 4.06 +0.48 Marketing and promotion of the event 4.53 4.06 +0.48 View of the event from your seat 4.53 4.39 +0.14 Ease of getting information about the event 4.49 3.94 +0.55 Helpfulness of staff/volunteers 4.48 4.48 0 Information/announcements at the venue 4.37 3.90 +0.47 Toilet facilities 4.35 4.17 +0.18 Signage around the event 4.32 3.78 +0.54 Entertainment at the venue 4.30 3.66 +0.64 Efficiency of access into the venue (queuing, bag searching) 4.16 4.06 +0.10 FOOD, DRINKS AND MERCHANDISE Merchandise quality at the venue 4.25 3.51 +0.74 Drinks quality at the venue 3.81 3.42 +0.39 Food quality at the venue 3.56 3.12 +0.44 Merchandise price at the venue 3.45 2.87 +0.58 Drinks price at the venue 2.88 2.50 +0.38 Food price at the venue 2.88 2.54 +0.34

HOST CITY (PRAGUE)

PRAGUE 2018 AVERAGE GSI DIFFERENCE RATING RATING Host city score 4.54 4.42 +0.12 Likelihood to revisit 4.46 3.76 +0.70 Likelihood to recommend 4.31 4.18 +0.13

OVERALL EXPERIENCE

PRAGUE 2018 AVERAGE GSI DIFFERENCE RATING RATING Overall event experience 4.78 4.34 +0.44

Media

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Media Television Overview

A total of 32 broadcasters across 17 nations in three continents provided broadcast TV broadcast overview coverage of the IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018. TV broadcasters 32 Coverage of Prague 2018 was available predominantly on free-to-air television TV continental reach 3 and a total of 322 hours of coverage was generated worldwide. TV nations 17 Broadcast data was not available for all broadcasters but based on the information TV broadcast hours* 322:03:25 received from 10 of the 33 broadcast rights holders, 8.1 million viewers watched TV cumulative audience* 8.1m the live or delayed coverage from Prague 2018.

In addition to TV coverage, the world championships were streamed live * broadcast data available only for selected worldwide on the Olympic Channel (22 matches) and the IFF’s YouTube channels markets (all matches).

TV broadcasters by region

HOST BROADCASTER Asia-Pacific 5 Europe 26 Free-to-air public-service broadcaster Czech Television was the host broadcaster North America 1 of the IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018.

In the host country the broadcaster showed 20 matches from the world Domestic focus – Czech Republic championships either live or delayed. Total broadcast time amounted to over (Czech TV) 49 hours, with a cumulative TV audience of more than two million viewers.

TV broadcast hours 49:26:32 TV audience 2.01m Matches broadcast 20

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Media Television Broadcast

Prague 2018 – TV broadcasters breakdown

TERRITORY BROADCASTER ACCESS RIGHTS TYPE Canada CTV Atlantic Free-to-air News, Delayed China Heilongjiang TV Pay-TV Live, Delayed Czech Republic Czech Television Free-to-air Live, Delayed Nova Sport Pay-TV News Seznam Zpravy Free-to-air News Denmark Danish Broadcasting Corporation Free-to-air Live, Delayed Estonia Kanal 12 Free-to-air News, Delayed TV 6 Free-to-air News Finland MTV3 Finland Free-to-air News Nelonen Free-to-air News YLE Free-to-air Live, Delayed Germany ARD Free-to-air Live, Delayed Mitteldeutscher Rundfunk (MDR) Free-to-air Live, Delayed Hungary Digi Sport Pay-TV News Japan J Sports Pay-TV News, Delayed Latvia Latvian Television Free-to-air Live, Delayed Norway Eurosport (Norway) Pay-TV Live, Delayed NRK Free-to-air News Russia Match TV Free-to-air News Singapore Eleven Sports Network Pay-TV News StarHub Pay-TV Live, Delayed Slovakia Arena Sports Free-to-air Live, Delayed Digi Sport Pay-TV News RTVS Free-to-air Live, Delayed TV Bratislava Free-to-air News TV Markiza Free-to-air News Sweden C More (Sweden) Pay-TV News Discovery (Sweden) Free-to-air Live, Delayed Eurosport (Sweden) Pay-TV Live, Delayed Swedish Television Free-to-air News Switzerland SRF Free-to-air Live, Delayed Thailand True Sport Pay-TV News

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Media Television Broadcast Hours

Live or delayed coverage of Prague 2018 was shown by 17 broadcasters TV broadcast hours – Live and delayed in 14 nations. The amount of broadcast hours totalled 322, according to the data coverage (Overview) received by IFF from broadcasters. TV broadcasters 18 Czech Television aired more matches than any other TV broadcaster, with TV broadcast hours* 322:03:25 20 matches broadcast. Matches broadcast on TV 44

The domestic broadcaster also recorded the longest broadcast time amongst * No broadcast data available for CTV Atlantic TV rights holders of the event with 49 hours, followed by Arena Sports in Slovakia (Canada), J Sports (Japan) and Kanal 12 and Latvian Television which both broadcast over 39 hours of coverage. (Estonia)

European broadcasters accounted for 87 per cent of the overall coverage of the event. TV broadcast hours by broadcaster

TV broadcast hours by region (live and delayed coverage)* ARD 0:45:21 Arena Sports 39:41:00 Czech Television 49:26:32 Danish Broadcasting 13% 21:05:00 Corporation Discovery (Sweden) 21:09:25 Eurosport (Sweden) 35:45:00 Asia Eurosport (Norway) 13:58:00 Heilongjiang TV 7:06:13 Europe Latvian Television 39:02:53 MDR 1:53:00 RTVS 6:44:15 SRF 18:27:25 87% StarHub 33:55:21 YLE 33:04:00

* No broadcast data available for CTV Atlantic (Canada), J Sports (Japan) and Kanal 12 (Estonia)

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Media Television Audience

The total cumulative audience of Prague 2018 amounted to 8.1 million viewers, TV audience – Live and delayed according to data provided by broadcasters. coverage (Overview)

Czech Republic accounted for the largest share of the audience (25 per cent TV broadcasters 17 of the total audience), with just over two million viewers watching coverage of the TV cumulative audience* 8.1m event. * No broadcast data available for ARD The final match of the world championships drew the highest number of viewers, (Germany), CTV Atlantic (Canada), Eurosport generating an audience of 1.35 million. Of that figure, 543,000 viewers watched Scandinavia (Norway and Sweden), Kanal 12 the coverage of the match in Finland and a further 187,024 viewers in Sweden, (Estonia), StarHub (Singapore) and J Sports the two nations that played in the final. In addition, the game attracted (Japan) an audience of 314,118 viewers in China.

TV cumulative audience – Live and Top ten broadcasts by TV viewers delayed coverage

MATCH TV VIEWERS Arena Sports 405,250 1 Finland – Sweden (final) 1,352,679 Czech Television 2,013,000 Danish Broadcasting 2 Czech Republic – Switzerland (3rd place match) 925,130 714,653 Corporation 3 Finland – Czech Republic (semi-final) 918,666 Discovery (Sweden) 209,467 4 Switzerland – Sweden (semi-final) 796,653 Heilongjiang TV 862,493 5 Finland – Sweden (group stage) 436,476 Latvian Television 208,082 6 Germany – Czech Republic (group stage) 289,001 MDR 802,300 7 Finland – Germany (quarter-final) 286,969 RTVS 302,000 8 Czech Republic – Switzerland (group stage) 246,000 SRF 726,305 9 Czech Republic – Denmark (quarter-final) 215,072 YLE 1,867,183

10 Latvia – Czech Republic (group stage) 204,830

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Media YouTube Video Analysis (IFF)

IFF provided coverage of all matches on its two official YouTube channels. IFF YouTube Channel 1 It generated 15.3 million views and 19.7 million minutes of watch time over the - users by country of origin (based on monitored period. The channels gained 8,459 new subscribers over the same minutes watched) period. Sweden 18.0% Finland 11.0% YouTube activity summary (24 November - 16 December 2018) Switzerland 9.9% Germany 8.2% TOTAL DAY AVERAGE Czech Republic 8.1% Watch time (minutes) 19,397,780 843,381 71,326 Views 1,640,508 IFF YouTube Channel 2 New subscribers* 4,017 175 - users by country of origin (based on * net growth of new subscribers over monitoring period minutes watched)

Matches played at the O2 arena were shown on IFF YouTube channel 1 and Sweden 15.0% matches taking place at Arena Sparta were aired on IFF YouTube channel 2. Both Finland 9.1% channels featured highlights videos and player interviews. Czech Republic 8.9% Singapore 8.1%

Norway 7.3% Key metrics breakdown by channel (24 November - 16 December 2018)

CHANNEL 1 CHANNEL 2 Watch time (minutes) 15,039,703 4,358,077

Views 1,310,986 329,522 New subscribers* 3,208 809 Likes 5,813 686

Comments 53,177 19,171 * net growth of new subscribers over monitoring period

The final match between Sweden and Finland was the most watched video on YouTube, generating an estimated 2,067,683 minutes of viewer time.

Top ten videos by minutes watched (17 November - 17 December 2018)

VIDEO WATCH TIME CHANNEL 1 Finland – Sweden (final) 2,067,683 Channel 1 2 Sweden - Switzerland (semi-final) 1,943,590 Channel 1 3 Czech Republic – Switzerland (group) 845,011 Channel 1 4 Finland – Sweden (group stage) 720,139 Channel 1 5 Czech Republic – Switzerland (3rd place) 649,327 Channel 1 6 Switzerland – Norway (quarter-final) 558,403 Channel 1 7 Sweden – Latvia (quarter-final) 554,239 Channel 1 8 Czech Republic – Finland (semi-final) 478,885 Channel 1 9 Denmark – Estonia (play-off) 458,698 Channel 1 10 Sweden – Norway (group stage) 436,089 Channel 1

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Media Online Prague 2018 (www.floorball.org/wfc2018)

Prague 2018 website traffic data: event period (1-9 December 2018) Prague 2018 website – users by country of origin (extended period) TOTAL DAY AVERAGE Users (unique) 162,458 18,051 Switzerland 15.2% USA 12.7% Sessions 238,043 26,449 Finland 10.7% Page views 837,557 93,062 Sweden 10.2%

Germany 7.7% A dedicated event website was set up for the world championships, which was intended for informative use: general information on the event, news and tickets.

The website handled 837,557 page views from 162,458 users during the competition, averaging 93,062 views per day.

Traffic to the website peaked on the fourth day of the competition, with 4 December recording the most users (21,115), sessions (31,149) and page views (118,694).

Over the extended event period the Prague 2018 website was visited by 181,713 unique users across 260,145 sessions which generated 912,170 page views.

Prague 2018 website traffic data: extended period by day (24 November - 16 December 2018)

120,000 110,000 100,000 90,000 80,000 70,000 60,000 50,000 40,000 30,000 20,000 10,000 0

24 Nov - 16 Dec Users Sessions Page Views

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Media Media Coverage Digital News

Prague 2018 generated 2,314 news stories, according to Meltwater, a media Methodology monitoring and intelligence company. Panel The research firm conducted an analysis of international digital media coverage Digital news media – 236,800 global of Prague 2018 before, during and after the event. editorial sources: newspapers, press releases, industry magazines, internet The research found that during the event there were 1,895 news stories published TV, internet radio – compared to 186 hits in the seven days before and 233 hits in the seven days after the event. Monitoring period The largest volume of digital news coverage was published in Czech Republic, 24 November – 16 December 2018 followed by Finland and Sweden. Conducted by Meltwater

Global digital news coverage summary (24 November – 16 December 2018) Global digital news – Top countries by 2000 1,895 stories published 1800 Czech Republic 885 1600 1400 Finland 552

1200 Sweden 424 1000 Slovakia 149 800 Switzerland 98

600 No. of stories published ofNo. stories 400 Denmark 35 186 233 200 Latvia 27 0 Estonia 27 Before (24-30 November) During (1-9 December) After (10-16 December) Singapore 22

United States 21

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Media Accredited Media

There were 212 accredited media at Prague 2018. This comprised accredited Accredited media – Overview journalists, reporters, photographers and broadcasters (television and radio). Accredited media 212 Overseas media personnel came from 17 countries across four continents. Sweden Domestic / Overseas 24% / 76% was the most represented nation with 67 accredited media present at the world championships, followed by Czech Republic (50) and Finland (18). No. of nations 18

Digital media accreditations contributed the highest number of accredited persons by type, accounting for 31 per cent of all accreditations – closely followed Accredited media by nationality by TV media representatives with 29 per cent of the accreditations. Sweden 67 Czech Republic 50 Finland 18 Accredited media by continent Slovakia 15 1% 1% 2% Switzerland 15 Germany 12 Norway 9 Netherlands 6 Asia Latvia 5 Hungary 3 Europe Australia 2 Canada 2 Oceania Estonia 2 Thailand 2 North America Denmark 1 Poland 1 96% Singapore 1 USA 1

Accredited media by type

19% Digital media 31% Photographer

Radio

TV 29% 17% Written press 4%

MediaSocial

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Media Overview

Six official social media accounts related to the IFF Men’s World Floorball Social media overview Championships 2018 were measured over a period of 23 days (from seven days – all accounts (event period) pre- to post-event). These comprised three IFF accounts and three world championships accounts across Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Posts 1,408 Reactions / Likes 419,612 The local organising committee was responsible for managing the world Shares / Retweets 2,959 championships accounts in the lead-up to and during the tournament. Comments 12,126 New followers* 8,154 Average follower increase 9.6% IFF social media accounts

Facebook Twitter Instagram * net growth of new followers over /IFF.Floorball @IFF_Floorball /iff_floorball competition period

Prague 2018 social media accounts

Facebook Twitter Instagram /worldfloorballchampionships @iffwfc /iffwfc

Over the nine days of competition, the six accounts recorded 1,408 posts, 419,612 likes and reactions and 8,154 new followers.

IFF and Prague 2018 social media account summary

IFF PRAGUE 2018 Avg. per Avg. per Total Total day day Posts 429 47.7 979 109 Reactions / Likes 204,453 22,717 215,159 23,907 Shares / Retweets 776 86.2 2,183 243 Comments 8,580 953 3,456 394 New followers 3,449 383 4,705 523 Average follower 2.4% 16.9% increase

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Media Platform Summary

FACEBOOK Social media accounts – daily average (event period) The IFF Facebook account generated 5,029 reactions and 332 shares from 118 posts. FACEBOOK IFF Prague 2018 The Prague 2018 Facebook account saw 18,464 reactions and 1,316 shares from Posts 118 345 345 posts during the competition. Reactions 5,029 18,464 Shares 332 1,316

Comments 209 2,640 TWITTER New followers 278 868 Avg. follower 0.7% 6.1% The IFF Twitter account registered 1,822 likes from 242 posts. increase

The Prague 2018 Twitter page recorded 337 posts, 867 retweets and 2,687 likes TWITTER IFF Prague 2018 during the competition with an increase of 179 followers (20 per day) during the event. Posts 242 337 Likes 1,822 2,687 Retweets 444 867 Comments 94 145 INSTAGRAM New followers 146 179 The IFF Instagram account attracted the most likes of all social media accounts Avg. follower 1.1% 10.2% during the event period (197,602) and generated 3,025 new followers. increase

The Prague 2018 Instagram page recorded 297 posts with 194,008 likes and INSTAGRAM IFF Prague 2018 761 comments during the competition, with an increase of 3,658 followers (406 Posts 69 297 per day). Likes 197,602 194,008 Comments 8,277 761 New followers 3,025 3,658 Avg. follower 5.3% 34.4% increase

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Media Social Media Strategy

The International Floorball Federation and the local organising committee worked INTERVIEW in partnership to ensure the widest possible coverage of the event on social media Mari Myllärinen platforms. Information Coordinator For the year of the world championships, IFF gives away the ownership of the International Floorball Federation event accounts on Instagram, Facebook and Twitter to local organisers, while Minna Nurminen it manages the general federation accounts across the three platforms. International Floorball Federation IFF received a strong support from the organising committee in communicating

Prague 2018. The organisers produced a lot of original content for social media, including:

• “Fast Track to Prague”, a monthly video magazine introducing the event to fans • “WFC? What the Floorball!”, short video clips helping fans to discover the host city of Prague

• “This is my game”, a series of interviews with the stars of the sport discussing their passion for floorball and sharing their experience from attending past editions of the world championships

During the world championships IFF and the organising committee coordinated their social media activity to avoid posting the same content and duplicating efforts.

Of the three major social media platforms, IFF built the largest fanbase on Instagram. It is a predominantly young audience that is looking for visual, engaging and light content. IFF wanted to do something new and different on Instagram during the event to engage participating teams and their fans. The new ideas that were positively received by the followers included a series of 10-second ‘mini-interviews’ with players from each of the participating teams and the use of the ‘Ask me a question’ feature, with the IFF social media team responding to questions from the followers.

On Twitter IFF concentrated on providing match reports, game highlights and promoting the YouTube live stream of the event, while Facebook was a platform on which a mixture of contents was posted: videos, pictures, statistics and match results.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Media Facebook IFF (/IFF.Floorball)

Facebook activity summary: event period (1-9 December 2018) Total fans

TOTAL DAY AVERAGE Start (30 November 2018) 41,394 Posts 118 13.1 End (10 December 2018) 41,672 Reactions 5,029 559 Shares 332 36.9

Comments 209 23.2 New page fans 278 30.9 (by 10 December 2018) (0.7% increase)

Facebook activity: event period by day (1-9 December 2018)

250 1400

1200 200 1000

150 800

100 600 Reactions 400 50

Posts, Comments and Comments Shares Posts, 200

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Date: 1-9 December Posts Comments Shares Reactions

Facebook activity: extended period by day (24 November - 16 December 2018)

80 1400

70 1200 60 1000 50 800 40 600

30 Reactions 400 20

10 200 Posts, Comments and Comments Shares Posts, 0 0 24 26 28 30 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Date: 24 November - 16 December

Posts Comments Shares Reactions

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Media Facebook Prague 2018 (/worldfloorballchampionships)

Facebook activity summary: event period (1-9 December 2018) Total fans

TOTAL DAY AVERAGE Start (30 November 2018) 14,272 Posts 345 38.3 End (10 December 2018) 15,140 Reactions 18,464 2,052 Shares 1,316 146

Comments 2,640 293 New page fans 868 96.4 (by 10 December 2018) (6.1% increase)

Facebook activity: event period by day (1-9 December 2018)

450 6000 400 5000 350 300 4000 250 3000 200

150 2000 Reactions 100 1000

Posts, Comments and Comments Shares Posts, 50 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Date: 1-9 December Posts Comments Shares Reactions

Facebook activity: extended period by day (24 November - 16 December 2018)

600 6000

500 5000

400 4000

300 3000

200 2000 Reactions

100 1000 Posts, Comments and Comments Shares Posts, 0 0 24 26 28 30 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Date: 24 November - 16 December

Posts Comments Shares Reactions

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Media Twitter IFF (@IFF_Floorball)

Twitter activity summary: event period (1-9 December 2018) Account followers

TOTAL DAY AVERAGE Start (30 November 2018) 13,165 Posts 242 26.9 End (10 December 2018) 13,311 Likes 1,822 202 Retweets 444 49.3

Comments 94 10.4 New followers 146 16.2 (by 10 December 2018) (1.1% increase)

Twitter activity: event period by day (1-9 December 2018)

160 300

140 250 120 200 100

80 150

100 Posts and and Posts Comments 40 and Retweets Likes 50 20

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Date: 1-9 December Posts Comments Retweets Likes

Twitter activity: extended period by day (24 November - 16 December 2018)

80 300 70 250 60 200 50 40 150 30 100

20 and Retweets Likes Posts and and Posts Comments 50 10 0 0 24 26 28 30 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Date: 24 November - 16 December

Posts Comments Retweets Likes

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Media Twitter Prague 2018 (@iffwfc)

Twitter activity summary: event period (1-9 December 2018) Account followers

TOTAL DAY AVERAGE Start (30 November 2018) 1,758 Posts 337 37.4 End (10 December 2018) 1,937 Likes 2,687 299 Retweets 867 96.3

Comments 145 16.1 New followers 179 19.9 (by 10 December 2018) (10.2% increase)

Twitter activity: event period by day (1-9 December 2018)

60 1000 900 50 800 700 40 600

30 500 Likes 400 20 300 200 10 Posts, Comments and Comments Retweets Posts, 100 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Date: 1-9 December Posts Comments Retweets Likes

Twitter activity: extended period by day (24 November - 16 December 2018)

350 1000 900 300 800 250 700 200 600 500 150 400 100 300

200 Likes and Retweets Posts and PostsComments 50 100 0 0 24 26 28 30 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Date: 24 November - 16 December

Posts Comments Retweets Likes

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Media Instagram IFF (/iff_floorball)

Instagram activity summary: event period (1-9 December 2018) Account followers

TOTAL DAY AVERAGE Start (30 November 2018) 57,594 Posts 69 7.7 End (10 December 2018) 60,619 Likes 197,602 21,956 Comments 8,277 920

New followers 3,025 336 (by 10 December 2018) (5.3% increase)

Instagram activity: event period by day (1-9 December 2018)

6,000 45000 40000 5,000 35000 4,000 30000 25000 3,000

20000 Likes 2,000 15000

Posts and and Posts Comments 10000 1,000 5000 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Date: 1-9 December Posts Comments Likes

Instagram activity: extended period by day (24 November - 16 December 2018)

6,000 45000 40000 5,000 35000 4,000 30000 25000 3,000

20000 Likes 2,000 15000

Posts and and Posts Comments 10000 1,000 5000 0 0 24 26 28 30 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Date: 24 November - 16 December

Posts Comments Likes

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Media Instagram Prague 2018 (/iffwfc)

Instagram activity summary: event period (1-9 December 2018) Account followers

TOTAL DAY AVERAGE Start (30 November 2018) 10,638 Posts 297 33 End (10 December 2018) 14,296 Likes 194,008 21,556 Comments 761 84.6

New followers 3,658 406 (by 10 December 2018) (34.4% increase)

Instagram activity: event period by day (1-9 December 2018)

160 40000

140 35000

120 30000

100 25000

80 20000 Likes 60 15000

40 10000 Posts and and Posts Comments

20 5000

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Date: 1-9 December Posts Comments Likes

Instagram activity: extended period by day (24 November - 16 December 2018)

160 40000

140 35000

120 30000

100 25000

80 20000 Likes 60 15000

40 10000 Post and and Post Comments

20 5000

0 0 24 26 28 30 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Date: 24 November - 16 December

Posts Comments Likes

Sponsorship

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Sponsorship Overview

The IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 were supported by a total Partners breakdown by type of 25 partners, representing 17 industry sectors.

IFF sponsors comprised floorball equipment manufacturers and apparel providers. They support all major international events organised under the IFF banner which 4 4 helps the federation to ensure a consistent look and feel of its main competitions.

The main domestic sponsors were long-term partners of Czech Floorball. 2 In addition to commercial and institutional partners, the event was supported by the following media partners: Big Media (advertising agency), BUS TV, Czech 25 PARTNERS Television, Óčko TV, Seznam.cz (website), and Evropa 2 (radio station). 3

9 Partners list 2 IFF SPONSORS SECTOR 1 CR8ER Sports equipment Gerflor Sports equipment IFF sponsors Swerink Sports equipment Main partners UNIHOC Sports equipment Official partners PRAGUE 2018 MAIN PARTNERS Partners Česká pojišťovna Financial services Official carrier Suppliers Holba Alcoholic beverages Institutional partners PRAGUE 2018 OFFICIAL PARTNERS

ČEPS Energy & mining

Tipsport Gambling & betting Partners breakdown by sector Volkswagen Automotive Sports equipment 4 PRAGUE 2018 PARTNERS Government 3 Severočeské doly Energy & mining Consumer electronics 2 T-Mobile Telecommunications Energy & mining 2 PRAGUE 2018 OFFICIAL CARRIER Transportation 2 Prague Public Transit Company Transportation Alcoholic beverages 1 PRAGUE 2018 SUPPLIERS Automotive 1 Coca-Cola Soft drinks Fashion 1 Dell Consumer electronics Financial services 1 Eclipse Printing services Gambling & betting 1 EKOSelect Waste management Governmental agency 1 Galerie Harfa Retail Hotel 1 Prague Airport Transportation Printing services 1 Sivek Hotels Hotel Retail 1 T. M. Lewin Fashion Soft drinks 1 VARTA Consumer electronics Telecommunications 1 PRAGUE 2018 INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS Waste management 1 City of Prague Local government TOTAL 25 Czech Tourism Governmental agency Ministry of Education, Youth and Sport National government Ministry of Regional Development National government 54 © and database right 2019 Sportcal Global Communications Ltd. All Rights Reserved.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Sponsorship Sponsorship Strategy International Floorball Federation

The International Floorball Federation generates north of €150,000 from INTERVIEW sponsorship annually in cash and in-kind contributions. The value of the sponsorship Tero Kalsta comes mainly from the visibility and the marketing assets that the federation Sales Coordinator partners receive during the world championships. International Floorball Federation Prague 2018 was an opportunity for IFF to showcase the growing strength of floorball and as a result build up its sponsorship portfolio in terms of the number of commercial partners and the overall income from sponsorship.

During the world championships IFF launched a survey to learn more about the fans of the sport, their behaviour and preferences. This was part of the assessment of the value of floorball that will help the federation to better determine the direction the sport should take in its commercial development (for example, understand which types of companies are considered good matches with floorball by fans and that IFF should be looking to be associated with).

IFF believes that growing the knowledge about the followers of the sport will also enable the federation to think more outside the box about sponsorship and the synergies it can find with corporate brands from sectors such as consumer electronics and video games publishing.

IFF has had a long relationship with the current sponsors who have a strong link with the sport (e.g. Swerink is a manufacturer of floorball rinks, while UNIHOC produces floorball equipment) and therefore act as strategic partners for IFF as their interests are aligned with the strategy and mission of the federation in terms of the development of floorball worldwide. The increase in the number of floorball players has a positive effect on their sales and they can help the federation by providing services and equipment to grow the sport in different markets which is where the in-kind element of sponsorships provides most value.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Sponsorship Sponsorship Strategy Czech Floorball and Prague 2018 Organising Committee

The objectives of the Prague 2018 sponsorship programme were linked to the INTERVIEWS overall marketing strategy of Czech Floorball and focused on demonstrating the Roman Urbář value of the sport to corporate partners, highlighting not only the size of its fanbase Marketing and Communications and participation numbers, but also floorball’s potential as a spectator sport. Manager The organisers developed a two-year roadmap to the world championships, Czech Floorball launching projects such as the Street Floorball League, the schools programme Tomáš Janča and the Prague 2018 fanzones to ensure the visibility for sponsors and create Head of Marketing and Communication activation opportunities for corporate partners to communicate their involvement Prague 2018 Organising Committee with the event.

In sponsorship sales the organisers focused on upselling the existing partners of Czech Floorball by offering them to become sponsors of the world championships. However, the ambition was also to find new companies that would like to associate themselves with a major sports event and floorball.

While the organising committee was successful in expanding the agreements with existing sponsors, targeting other companies was more challenging and several new partners that were confirmed joined the sponsor roster mostly at the basic supplier level.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Sponsorship IFF Sponsor Case Study Gerflor

Gerflor is a French company that specialises in flooring solutions and that has been an IFF partner since 2001.

The company is the official flooring provider of IFF and its product is used at the senior and youth world championships, as well as the world championships qualification tournaments. In addition to the in-kind support, the company pays a fee to secure additional visibility for the brand at these events.

While Gerflor is present in over 100 markets worldwide, the IFF partnership INTERVIEW contributes to enhancing brand recognition, especially in the traditional markets Lionel Arlin for floorball, according to Lionel Arlin, sports federations and events manager Sports Federations and Events Manager at Gerflor. It is useful for the brand to be able to showcase its product during the Gerflor biggest floorball events and it activates the sponsorship by inviting guests (e.g. architects, consultants for cities and other decision-makers) from a number of countries to attend the world floorball championships.

During Prague 2018 Gerflor extended its sponsorship of IFF for a four-year period through to 2022.

The company believes that its cooperation with IFF can be even closer to accelerate the growth of floorball in certain markets. With its worldwide presence and a network of contacts, Gerflor is well-placed to support the development of the sport. However, according to Arlin, time, patience and a good brand story are required by floorball as it strives to expand its global footprint.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Sponsorship Prague 2018 Sponsor Case Study Tipsport

Tipsport is the largest betting company in the Czech Republic with a market share of around 70 per cent. The brand has been the title sponsor of the Czech floorball league since 2015.

Tipsport is a sponsor of a number of other sports properties in the Czech Republic, including the top division and the second division in ice hockey, known as Tipsport Extraliga and Chance Liga (Chance is a betting brand that is part of Tipsport), INTERVIEW respectively. Václav Sochor While ice hockey and football are the two most popular sports in the Czech Head of Corporate Communications Republic, floorball is an attractive property for companies as it trails only football Tipsport in the number of registered players and is extremely popular amongst pupils in elementary and secondary schools. Tipsport’s clients don’t bet on floorball as much as they do on football, ice hockey, tennis and some winter sports, but the interest in floorball as a betting sport is growing, according to Václav Sochor, Tipsport’s head of corporate communications.

The company believes that there is more and more professionalism in floorball, but it still doesn’t have the same commercial status as other major sports in the country. However, according to Sochor, the less commercial character of floorball can work in favour of the sport as it makes it sport more ‘pure’ than football or ice hockey.

The sponsorship of Prague 2018 was an expansion of Tipsport’s partnership with Czech Floorball. The company was looking to generate revenue from bets placed on the results of the world championships. The total number of bets was expected to be linked to the performance of the Czech national team. The sponsorship was also a brand-building exercise and Tipsport felt that it benefited from the event being broadcast by Czech Television and from the professional organisation of the world championships.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Sponsorship Sponsorship Awareness

To evaluate the awareness of the Prague 2018 partners, attendees were asked Methodology to indicate which brands they recognised as sponsors of the event. Online survey The brands most commonly associated with the event were Holba, the Czech brewery and a domestic sponsor of the event, and UNIHOC, IFF partner and Sample group supplier of floorball equipment. Event spectators (326 respondents)

Other main partners of the event: Česká pojišťovna, an insurance company, ČEPS, Conducted and analysed by Sportcal an energy company and Tipsport, a betting company, also had an awareness of at least 50 per cent. In general, brands not associated with the event received lower awareness scores than the official sponsors. However, major sponsors of sport in the Czech Republic, including Škoda, the Czech automotive brand, and Fortuna, a betting company, were wrongly indicated by many spectators as event sponsors.

Sponsors by % awareness (Prompted awareness)*

Holba 69% UNIHOC 60% ČEPS 59% Česká pojišťovna 51% Tipsport 50% T-Mobile 47% Volkswagen 47% Skoda 44% Fortuna 39% Salming Aero 34% Pilsner Urquell 30% Kooperativa pojišťovna 28% Gerflor 28% Vodafone 27% Swerink 18% Duracell 16% Varta 13% CR8ER 8% Tarkett 8% EPH 5% FCC 3% EKO Select 3% DOR-SPORT Rink 3% Megasat 0.3% None of the above 5%

* in red brands that were not official sponsors of Prague 2018

Sporting

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Sporting Athletes and Nations

A total of 325 players representing 16 nations took part in the IFF Men’s World Key statistics Floorball Championships 2018 in Prague.

Athletes 325 Europe was the most represented continent, with 11 nations and 220 athletes. Competing nations 16 Asia was represented by three nations, while the two remaining teams hailed from from North America (Canada) and Oceania (Australia).

A total of 33 teams took part in the regional qualification process which was held Prague 2018 – Competing nations in January and February 2018. In Asia, the Chinese men’s national team participated in a world championships qualification event for the first time. Australia Oceania It competed in the Asia-Oceania qualification, which took place in Jeju Island, Canada North America South Korea. This was also the first time the men’s qualification tournament had Czech Republic Europe been organised in that country. Denmark Europe Estonia Europe The other qualification events were held in North America (Canada) and Europe Finland Europe (Estonia, Latvia, Slovakia). Germany Europe As the host nation of the 2018 world championships, Czech Republic automatically Japan Asia qualified for the tournament. Latvia Europe Norway Europe

Poland Europe IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships – Competing nations (1998-2018)* Singapore Asia Slovakia Europe

18 Sweden Europe Switzerland Europe 16 1 2 1 1 1 Thailand Asia 14 1 2 2 1

12 10 8 11 12 12 11 11 6 10 10 10 4 8 8 8 2 2 2 2 2 3 0 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018

Asia Europe North America Oceania

* The world championships were played in two divisions (A and B) between 1998 and 2008

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Sporting Performance

Finland defended the world championship title with a 6-3 victory over Sweden Czech Republic’s performance at in the final of Prague 2018, while host country Czech Republic missed out IFF Men’s World Floorball on a medal following a 2-4 defeat against Switzerland in the third-place decider. Championships, 2008-2018

Czech Republic, Finland, Sweden and Switzerland have been the only four nations that have won a medal at the world championships since 1998. Norway secured YEAR HOST RANK the bronze medal at the inaugural edition of the event in 1996. 2008 Prague 4th 2010 Helsinki 3rd

2012 Zurich 7th IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships medalists, 1998-2018 2014 Gothenburg 3rd

2016 Riga 4th YEAR HOST GOLD SILVER BRONZE 2018 Prague 4th 1996 Stockholm Sweden Finland Norway 1998 Prague Sweden Switzerland Finland 2000 Oslo Sweden Finland Switzerland 2002 Helsinki Sweden Finland Switzerland 2004 Zurich Sweden Czech Republic Finland 2006 Stockholm Sweden Finland Switzerland 2008 Prague Finland Sweden Switzerland 2010 Helsinki Finland Sweden Czech Republic 2012 Zurich Sweden Finland Switzerland 2014 Gothenburg Sweden Finland Czech Republic 2016 Riga Finland Sweden Switzerland 2018 Prague Finland Sweden Switzerland

DOMESTIC PERFORMANCE

Czech Republic finished the tournament in fourth place, the same position it had in 2016. The nation’s best ever result in the world championships was a silver medal in 2004 in Zurich, Switzerland.

Prague 2018 – final standings

PLACE NATION PLACE NATION 1st Finland 9th Slovakia 2nd Sweden 10th Estonia 3rd Switzerland 11th Canada 4th Czech Republic 12th Australia 5th Latvia 13th Poland 6th Germany 14th Thailand 7th Norway 15th Japan 8th Denmark 16th Singapore

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Sporting Officials

A total of 153 officials were present at Prague 2018, including 129 team officials Key statistics and 24 technical officials. Team officials 129 Due to strong representation of European teams, officials from Europe accounted Technical officials 24 for over 71 per cent of all officials. Officials from Asia made up 17 per cent of the total. IFF Jury 4 IFF Referee 16 Canada, Czech Republic, Finland, Switzerland and Thailand had the most team IFF Referee Management 4 officials out of all teams.

Amongst team officials, 85 per cent were male and 15 per cent were female. Number of officials by team

Prague 2018 – Officials by continent Canada 10 Czech Republic 10 Finland 10 Switzerland 10 4% 8% 17% Thailand 10 Asia Latvia 9 Poland 9 Europe Singapore 9 Sweden 9 North America Germany 8 Denmark 7 Oceania Estonia 7 71% Slovakia 7 Norway 6 Australia 5 Japan 3 Prague 2018 – Team officials by type

Gender breakdown of team officials ROLE OFFICIALS Male 85% Coach/Assistant Coach 29 Female 15% Physiotherapist 18 Head Coach 16 Team Manager 15 Equipment Manager/Material Keeper 6 Physical Coach 6 Masseur 5 Goalie Coach 4 Other 31 TOTAL 129* * Total does not tally up as Japan’s head coach also had a role of a team manager

Social

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Volunteer Programme

A total of 378 volunteers supported the running of the IFF Men’s World Floorball Key statistics Championships 2018, including 178 volunteers who worked at the fanzones set up in 12 Czech cities during the event. Volunteers (total) 378 Volunteers (competition) 200 The recruitment of the volunteers started in August 2017 through the following channels: Male / Female 57% / 43% Domestic / Overseas 88% / 12% • Online campaign targeting the floorball community (referees, coaches and Volunteers (fanzones) 178 players) and general sports fans No. of nations 10 • E-mail communication sent to volunteers at previous major events organised Applications received 536 by Czech Floorball (including the men’s and women’s world championships in 2008 and 2013, respectively) • Facebook groups uniting volunteers from major events held in the Czech Volunteer age breakdown Republic in recent years Age breakdown All people interested in applying to become a volunteer at Prague 2018 were <20 years old 32% requested to fill in a registration form and could stay up-to-date with new 20-30 years old 40% announcements by joining a special Facebook group for the event. 30-40 years old 17% The applicants could take part in a workshop as part of which their soft skills and 40-50 years old 8% experience were assessed. Skype conversations were arranged with overseas >50 years old 3% applicants and people with a proven history of involvement in international events, Youngest volunteer 11 years old while face-to-face interviews were organised with potential volunteers who Oldest volunteer 65 years old applied for the key roles (e.g. team guide). There was a limited number of positions available for the applicants with no Volunteer functional areas previous experience in the organisation of a sports event. However, Czech

Floorball created an opportunity for this group to volunteer at test events in the Backup lead-up to Prague 2018 and gain the experience required to be selected to fulfil Drivers certain roles during the world championships. Fanzones – various roles The recruited volunteers were provided with a guidebook with detailed Match secretariat information about the event and their respective roles. The day before the start Media section – three different roles of the world championships a meeting was organised for all volunteers who then Rink team took part in separate training sessions depending on the position that they would Security assume during the event. Team guides Venue staff – four different roles Accommodation was arranged for all volunteers that required it for the time of the (statistics, accreditations etc.) event. The volunteers also received breakfast, lunch and dinner and had all-day VIP assistant – two different roles access to drinks at the venues. The other benefits included: free public transport, official clothes and additional equipment (depending on the role). The approximate cost of a package for a single volunteer was €550-€600. INTERVIEW Of the total 200 volunteers present in Prague during the competition (named Jan Jirovský as ‘TEAM 2018’), 16 per cent were from the host city, 66 per cent came from other External Relations and Human regions of the Czech Republic and 18 per cent were overseas volunteers (mostly Resources from Poland and Slovakia, but also Australia, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Slovenia, Prague 2018 Organising Committee Sweden and Russia).

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Prague 2018 Fanzones

Twelve fanzones were organised across the Czech Republic to give the fans an opportunity to watch together the final stages of the world championships, support the Czech national team and embrace the atmosphere of the event.

The fanzones were created for four days (6-9 December) in major Czech cities: Brno, České Budějovice, Hradec Králové, Jihlava, Liberec, Karlovy Vary, Olomouc, Ostrava, Pardubice, Plzeň, Ústí nad Labem and Zlín in a variety of indoor and outdoor locations. The fans were able to follow the climax of Prague 2018 on LED screens, purchase event merchandise, food and drinks and take part in the entertainment programme that included floorball games, competitions testing floorball skills and a range of family activities.

The project took a year to prepare and one of its aims was to engage the floorball community across the country. Irrespective of whether the people were planning to attend the world championships, they could experience the event in the fanzones.

Another objective of the initiative was to make floorball more visible at a local level, demonstrate its social benefits and showcase the status of floorball as one of the most popular sports in the Czech Republic.

Each fanzone had a local project manager, working in coordination with the Prague 2018 fanzones opening hours Prague 2018 Organisation Committee. Of the total of 12 project managers, six were regional employees of Czech Floorball and six represented local floorball Thu 6 Dec 3pm – 10pm clubs. All project managers volunteered to fulfil their roles. Fri 7 Dec 2pm – 10pm Czech Floorball covered the entire cost required to set up the fanzones. In some Sat 8 Dec 12 noon – 10pm locations additional funding was secured from local partners, including city Sun 9 Dec 9am – 7pm authorities.

An estimated 4,500 fans attended the fanzones during the final four days of the event.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Schools Programme

A major schools programme was organised around the IFF Men’s World Floorball Key statistics Championships 2018, creating an opportunity for thousands of children from the Czech Republic to attend the event. A total of 522 institutions participated in the Participants - children 22,258 programme, with 22,258 children attending Prague 2018 through the project. Foster home 230 Kindergarten / Elementary Floorball enjoys high participation levels in the Czech Republic and is a sport 16,896 school of choice for many children in elementary and secondary schools. Through the Secondary school 4,783 schools programme the organisers wanted to show the children what a floorball University 349 competition at the highest level looks like.

The interest in the programme surpassed the expectations of the organising Participants - institutions 522 committee which could not accommodate all the institutions that were keen to Foster home 16 Kindergarten / Elementary participate. Almost 3,000 children were on the waiting list days before the event. 375 school Over 70 per cent of all participants came from outside of Prague, with Central Secondary school 112 Bohemia (3,460 children), Ústí nad Labem (1,546) and Vysočina (1,504) being the University 19 most represented regions.

No. of participating institutions and children by region

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Street Floorball League

To support the promotion of the IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Czech Floorball launched the Street Floorball League in the summer of 2018. Česká pojišťovna, the Czech insurance company that is one of the main partners of Czech Floorball, became the title sponsor of the project, with other federation sponsors also involved. The league consisted of a series of events held in 12 cities across the Czech Republic which acted as qualifiers for the final tournament played during the world championships.

All-male, all-female and mixed teams could enter the competition and players aged 15 and older were eligible to take part. However, male competitors who played in the top two divisions of Czech floorball in the 2017-18 season were excluded from the league. Street Floorball League event dates The tournaments were played in the three-on-three format on a 24x12 metre pitch, and locations with small goals used. The duration of one match was 12 minutes. 10 June České Budějovice The 12 qualifiers were heavily branded with the Prague 2018 identity and the 16 June Liberec players and spectators had the opportunity to learn more about the upcoming 17 June Mladá Boleslav world championships. A total of 222 teams registered for the league and the 24 June Karlovy Vary winning teams in each location progressed to the final tournament that was held 28 July Ostrava in the O2 arena on Friday 7 December. The second half of the final match was 29 July Olomouc played during the break in the world championships quarterfinal between Sweden 4 August Zlín and Latvia. 5 August Brno The teams that advanced to the final tournament also received tickets to the 11 August Pardubice Prague 2018 quarterfinals held on Thursday 6 December, including the home 12 August Hradec Králové nation’s game against Denmark, while Česká pojišťovna provided them with 18 August Ústí nad Labem refreshments and organised a tour around the O2 arena. 19 August Plzeň

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Member Federation Activities Finland’s Fan Programme and House of Switzerland

Social engagement projects around IFF Men’s World Championships 2018 included INTERVIEWS a couple of initiatives undertaken by IFF member federations. Janne Bruun Business Development Manager Finnish Floorball Federation FINLAND’S FAN PROGRAMME (Suomen Salibandyliitto) The Finnish Floorball Federation developed an extensive programme for the Michael Zoss supporters of the national team who travelled to Prague. CEO The fans could purchase a package that included charter flights between Helsinki Swiss Floorball Association and Prague, airport transfers, room reservation in a hotel in the centre of Prague (Swiss Unihockey) and tickets to Finland’s match in the semi-final and the medal games on the final day of the event.

The fans got together ahead of the matches in Pilsen Restaurant Prag in the city centre where they were entertained by Finnish DJ Johannes Kastaja and could meet with Finnish floorball legends Mikko Kohonen and Toni Lötjönen.

After the semi-final a boat cruise on the Vltava river was oganised, while in the evening on the final day of the competition the fans were invited to gather in Ku Club & Bar in Prague’s old town.

The objective of the programme was to bring together the Finnish fans and create an engaging fan culture. It was also part of the build-up to the next men’s world championships which Finland will host in 2020.

HOUSE OF SWITZERLAND

The House of Switzerland was organised in one of Prague’s restaurants (Hangar Bar) by the Swiss Floorball Association. The concept, originally developed by the Swiss Ski Federation, was tested at the world championships in Riga in 2016.

The idea behind the House of Switzerland is to create a meeting place before and after the matches for the Swiss fans, as well as other floorball fans. In Prague the visitors could purchase Swiss specialities and local delicacies, meet with the current and former players of the Swiss national team and enjoy music played by a Swiss DJ.

It was estimated that around 1,500 Swiss fans came to Prague to attend the world championships.

The House of Switzerland was open from Friday 7 December until Sunday 9 December.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Social Education & Engagement Other Initiatives

INTERNATIONAL COACHING CONFERENCE

An international coaching conference was organised by Czech Floorball during the IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018. The conference took place on Thursday 6 December and was attended by 280 coaches from eight countries.

The conference programme comprised three keynote presentations from:

• Joonas Naava (sports director of EräViikingit, a Finnish floorball club, and

a former coach of the Finland U19 national team) – How to promote teamwork and define player roles in the team? • Marek Vojta (head coach of Florbal Ústí, a Czech floorball club) – How to train the mindset of players? • Patrik Bäck (general manager of IBF Falun, a Swedish floorball club) – How to build and maintain team’s performance in the long-term?

All presentations were interpreted to English.

FLOORBALL POINT

The organisers created Floorball Point in Galerie Harfa, a shopping centre adjacent to the O2 arena. It was a special space with entertainment options for both children and adults: a mini floorball field, a television screen and a chill-out zone, a beer tasting stand, an information point, an exhibition area with pictures presenting the history of floorball and a merchandising stand.

Floorball fans and passers-by could take part in various prize competitions and measure the speed of their shot, while children were encouraged to draw a floorball picture and win one of the prizes funded by event partners.

Floorball Point was open for the entire duration of the world championships.

‘BEHIND THE SCENES’ TOUR

The fans could purchase tickets to attend the ‘behind the scenes’ tour during the world championships and get access to changing rooms, media facilities and the VIP zone.

The tour was hosted by a former Czech national team player and a single ticket cost around 30 euros.

Legacy

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Legacy Short- and Long-term Legacy

The IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 were regarded as ‘the best Key objectives ever’ by most event participants, setting a new standard for floorball and raising the bar for future organisers. “Showcase the sport at its When Czech Floorball organised the men’s world championships in 2008 and best and increase its staged some games in the largest indoor venue in the country, the O2 arena visibility for fans, in Prague, the event had a major impact on the self-confidence of everyone involved and was a big boost for the development of floorball in the Czech broadcasters and sponsors” Republic. The sport has come a long way in the last decade – the number of full- time staff working for the Czech elite league clubs has increased from less than “Continue the global 10 to over 100 and floorball has become less reliant on public funding. development of the sport” Czech Floorball hoped that Prague 2018 would have the same impact on the sport as the previous men’s world championships hosted in the Czech Republic. The federation set ambitious attendance targets and made a major investment in the “Redefine the status of the organisation of the world championships to demonstrate that floorball is capable sport and generate pride in of delivering a world-class event, inspiring not only to the local floorball the floorball community” community, but also more than 50 national federations that attended the IFF General Assembly that took place during the world championships. “Grow the commercial value Czech Floorball decided to do most of the work in-house, with the substantial involvement of its permanent employees, to build the know-how that will help of floorball and capture the it to produce floorball events in the future, while a coaching seminar organised interest of corporate during Prague 2018 encouraged knowledge-sharing within the sport. The brands” federation also purchased the flooring used at the Street Floorball League tournaments to be able to stage outdoor floorball events going forward.

Nearly 99 per cent of all spectators stated that they had an enjoyable time at Prague 2018, according to Sportcal’s attendee survey, which is evidence of the high entertainment value of the event. The success of the event was also reflected in the positive feedback received from other stakeholder groups, including event partners. For both IFF and the local organisers the commercial growth of floorball is one of the priorities. IFF announced in Prague the four-year extensions of the sponsorship agreements with two of its main suppliers, Gerflor and UNIHOC, while Czech Floorball invited to the event major Czech companies that it is hoping to work with in the future.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Legacy Sporting Legacy Interest in Floorball

Sportcal asked the spectators about their interest in floorball following their visit to Prague 2018 within the event experience survey in order to gauge the impact of the event and its potential future legacies.

In order to assess the impact of the event on changing perceptions, Sportcal also assessed the likelihood of the spectators to have subsequently become more interested in following or participating in the sport.

The results were positive, highlighting that the event had encouraged spectators to follow the sport more upon the conclusion of the tournament, whether it be in person at an event or on television. 80 per cent of respondents stated they would follow floorball more having attended Prague 2018.

In terms of participation, the same group of respondents also showed interest in participating in the sport, with one in two respondents stating that they would like their participation in the sport to be more regular.

Interest, following and participation in floorball – Prague 2018 spectator survey

How interested are you in Has attending the event Has attending the event following floorball? encouraged you to follow encouraged you to the sport (more)? participate in the sport (more)? 2% 1% 1% 3% 2%

4% 13% 13% 14% 37% 8% 18%

19% 61% 66% 24% 14%

5 - Very interested 5 - Definitely yes 5 - Definitely yes

4 4 4 3 3 3 2 2 2 1 - Definitely not 1 - Definitely not 1 - Not interested Don't know Don't know

Analysis

Data Data Comparative

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis Overview

The findings from this study were compared to data from world championships in other sports, across five key indicators.

Two sets of comparative events were identified to conduct the analysis:

1) A total of 27 world championships in summer Olympic sports held in 2018 (excluding new sports which have been added to the Olympic programme from 2020)

2) The 2018 world championships governed by selected ARISF member federations

The indicators chosen for comparison were: attendance, athletes, competing nations, accredited media and volunteers. Data for attendance, accredited media and volunteers was estimated for events where no confirmed data is available. This has been indicated in each respective comparison page.

Comparative data overview – 2018 world championships

RANK* INDICATOR PRAGUE 2018 (WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS HELD IN 2018) Attendance 181,518 6/20 Athletes 325 21/29 Nations 16 =26/29 Accredited Media 212 10/22 Volunteers 378 13/20 *For some events and indicators, data was not available for analysis. This has been noted on each respective comparison page where applicable.

Comparative data overview – ARISF federations’ world championships

INDICATOR PRAGUE 2018 RANK Attendance 181,518 1/9 Athletes 325 6/9 Nations 16 7/9 Accredited Media 212 4/9 Volunteers 378 2/9

Due to inconsistency in the reporting of attendance figures by event organisers and owners, the data recorded is a variation of total attendance, ticketed attendance and estimated attendance. It is recommended that the data is treated with care for comparison as it may not be representative of the equivalent type of attendance.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis Attendance 2018 World Championships

Attendance rank

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Rank 181,518 6/20 events

Attendance comparison

FIFA World Cup 2018 3,031,768

UCI Road World Championships 2018 590,000

Hempel Sailing World Championships Aarhus 2018 400,000

FIVB Men's Volleyball World Championships 2018 389,129

FIVB Women's Volleyball World Championships 2018 224,415

IFF Men's World Floorball Championships 2018 181,518

FEI World Equestrian Games 2018 176,667

Vitality FIH Women's World Cup 2018 120,000

Rugby World Cup Sevens 2018 102,000

UCI Mountain Bike World Championships 2018 65,000

UWW World Championships 2018 53000

TOTAL BWF World Championships 2018 41,075

Liebherr World Team Table Tennis Championships 2018 29,000

Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championship 2018 24,906

Artistic Gymnastics World Championships 2018 20,479

UCI Track World Championships 2018 18,680

UIPM 2018 Pentathlon World Championships 12,000

ISSF Shooting World Championships 2018 6,026

World Rowing Championships 2018 3,400

World Archery Field Championships 2018 1,800

0 500,000 1,000,000 1,500,000 2,000,000 2,500,000 3,000,000 3,500,000

Attendance figures not available for nine of 29 events used in comparative analysis.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis Attendance ARISF Federations’ World Championships

Attendance rank

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Rank 181,518 1/9 events

Attendance comparison

IFF Men's World Floorball Championships 2018 181,518

IFSC World Championships 2018 61,700

World Karate Championships 2018* 30,000

Nokian Tyres World Orienteering Championships 2018 25,000

World Roller Speed Skating Championships 2018 25,000

FIL Men's World Lacrosse Championships 2018* 20,000

IWWF World Cableski Championships 2018* 3,000

IWWF Wakeboard World Championships 2017* (delayed until 2,000 2018)

WTBA World Tenpin Bowling Championships 2018 (Men's) 1,200

0 40,000 80,000 120,000 160,000 200,000

* estimated data

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis Athletes 2018 World Championships

Athletes rank

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Rank 325 21/29 events

Athletes comparison

ISSF Shooting World Championships 2018 1,805 Hempel Sailing World Championships Aarhus 2018 1,270 UCI Road World Championships 2018 974 World Rowing Championships 2018 947 ICF Canoe Sprint World Championships 2018 808 World Judo Championships 2018 786 Fencing World Championships 2018 742 FIFA World Cup 2018 736 FEI World Equestrian Games 2018 718 UWW World Championships 2018 703 UCI Mountain Bike World Championships 2018 687 Liebherr World Team Table Tennis Championships 2018 588 World Weightlifting Championships 2018 582 FIVB Men's Volleyball World Championships 2018 528 Artistic Gymnastics World Championships 2018 499 Rugby World Cup Sevens 2018 480 TOTAL BWF World Championships 2018 368 Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championship 2018 362 UCI Track World Championships 2018 346 FIVB Women's Volleyball World Championships 2018 332 IFF Men's World Floorball Championships 2018 325 Odisha Hockey Men's World Cup 2018 295 Vitality FIH Women's World Cup 2018 291 AIBA Women's World Championships 2018 277 UIPM 2018 Pentathlon World Championships 267 World Archery Field Championships 2018 261 ICF Canoe Slalom World Championships 2018 230 UCI BMX World Championships 2018 230 FIBA Women's Basketball World Cup 2018 192

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800 2,000

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis Athletes ARISF Federations’ World Championships

Athletes rank

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Rank 325 6/9 events

Athletes comparison

World Karate Championships 2018 1,214

FIL Men's World Lacrosse Championships 2018 1,039

IFSC World Championships 2018 531

World Roller Speed Skating Championships 2018 446

Nokian Tyres World Orienteering Championships 2018 341

IFF Men's World Floorball Championships 2018 325

WTBA World Tenpin Bowling Championships 2018 (Men's) 267

IWWF Wakeboard World Championships 2017 (Delayed until 2018) 129

IWWF World Cableski Championships 2018 57

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis Nations 2018 World Championships

Nations rank

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Rank 16 =26/29 events

Nations comparison

World Judo Championships 2018 123 Fencing World Championships 2018 101 ISSF Shooting World Championships 2018 89 UWW World Championships 2018 87 World Weightlifting Championships 2018 85 Hempel Sailing World Championships Aarhus 2018 84 Liebherr World Team Table Tennis Championships 2018 84 UCI Road World Championships 2018 78 Artistic Gymnastics World Championships 2018 76 FEI World Equestrian Games 2018 67 ICF Canoe Sprint World Championships 2018 66 World Rowing Championships 2018 63 AIBA Women's World Championships 2018 62 Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championship 2018 61 UCI Mountain Bike World Championships 2018 55 TOTAL BWF World Championships 2018 48 UCI Track World Championships 2018 40 ICF Canoe Slalom World Championships 2018 38 UIPM 2018 Pentathlon World Championships 35 UCI BMX World Championships 2018 33 FIFA World Cup 2018 32 World Archery Field Championships 2018 31 Rugby World Cup Sevens 2018 28 FIVB Men's Volleyball World Championships 2018 24 FIVB Women's Volleyball World Championships 2018 24 FIBA Women's Basketball World Cup 2018 16 IFF Men's World Floorball Championships 2018 16 Odisha Hockey Men's World Cup 2018 16 Vitality FIH Women's World Cup 2018 16

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis Nations ARISF Federations’ World Championships

Nations rank

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Rank 16 7/9 events

Nations comparison

FIL Men's World Lacrosse Championships 2018 129

IFSC World Championships 2018 57

Nokian Tyres World Orienteering Championships 2018 49

World Roller Speed Skating Championships 2018 47

WTBA World Tenpin Bowling Championships 2018 (Men's) 47

IWWF Wakeboard World Championships 2017 (Delayed until 26 2018)

IFF Men's World Floorball Championships 2018 16

World Karate Championships 2018 16

IWWF World Cableski Championships 2018 12

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis Accredited Media 2018 World Championships

Accredited media rank

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Rank 212 10/22 events

Accredited media comparison

FIFA World Cup 2018 17,572

FEI World Equestrian Games 2018 983

UCI Road World Championships 2018 831

Artistic Gymnastics World Championships 2018 577

FIBA Women's Basketball World Cup 2018 493

ISSF Shooting World Championships 2018 353

UCI Track World Championships 2018 300

TOTAL BWF World Championships 2018 268

Liebherr World Team Table Tennis Championships 2018 250

IFF Men's World Floorball Championships 2018 212

Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championship 2018 210

Hempel Sailing World Championships Aarhus 2018 200

Odisha Hockey Men's World Cup 2018 200

Rugby World Cup Sevens 2018 200

UCI Mountain Bike World Championships 2018 173

UIPM 2018 Pentathlon World Championships 130

World Rowing Championships 2018 127

AIBA Women's World Championships 2018 122

World Archery Field Championships 2018 33

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000 20,000

Accredited media figures not available for seven of 29 events used in comparative analysis.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis Accredited Media ARISF Federations’ World Championships

Accredited media rank

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Rank 212 4/9 events

Accredited media comparison

WTBA World Tenpin Bowling Championships 2018 (Men's) 314

World Karate Championships 2018* 250

FIL Men's World Lacrosse Championships 2018 218

IFF Men's World Floorball Championships 2018 212

Nokian Tyres World Orienteering Championships 2018 100

World Roller Speed Skating Championships 2018 93

IFSC World Championships 2018 45

IWWF Wakeboard World Championships 2017* (Delayed until 10 2018)

IWWF World Cableski Championships 2018* 10

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

* estimated data

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis Volunteers 2018 World Championships

Volunteers rank

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Rank 378 13/20 events

Volunteers comparison

FIFA World Cup 2018 17,040

FIVB Women's Volleyball World Championships 2018 2,108

FEI World Equestrian Games 2018 1,622

UCI Road World Championships 2018 1,492

FIVB Men's Volleyball World Championships 2018 1,350

Rugby World Cup Sevens 2018 1,200

Vitality FIH Women's World Cup 2018 1,000

Hempel Sailing World Championships Aarhus 2018 800

TOTAL BWF World Championships 2018 600

Artistic Gymnastics World Championships 2018 540

Fencing World Championships 2018 400

Liebherr World Team Table Tennis Championships 2018 400

IFF Men's World Floorball Championships 2018 378

AIBA Women's World Championships 2018 350

FIBA Women's Basketball World Cup 2018 340

ISSF Shooting World Championships 2018 330

World Rowing Championships 2018 295

UIPM 2018 Pentathlon World Championships 150

Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championship 2018 120

World Archery Field Championships 2018 80

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 18,000

Volunteer figures not available for nine of 29 events used in comparative analysis.

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis Volunteers ARISF Federations’ World Championships

Volunteers rank

IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Rank 378 2/9 events

Volunteers comparison

FIL Men's World Lacrosse Championships 2018 400

IFF Men's World Floorball Championships 2018 378

Nokian Tyres World Orienteering Championships 2018 300

World Roller Speed Skating Championships 2018 230

IFSC World Championships 2018 150

World Karate Championships 2018 90

IWWF World Cableski Championships 2018* 50

WTBA World Tenpin Bowling Championships 2018 (Men's) 20

IWWF Wakeboard World Championships 2017* (Delayed until 15 2018)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

* estimated data

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis Comparison Events

World championships in 2018

SPORT EVENT CITY NATION Archery World Archery Field Championships 2018 Cortina d'Ampezzo Italy Badminton TOTAL BWF World Championships 2018 Nanjing China Basketball FIBA Women's Basketball World Cup 2018 Tenerife Spain Boxing AIBA Women's World Championships 2018 New Delhi India Canoeing ICF Canoe Slalom World Championships 2018 Rio de Janeiro Brazil Canoeing ICF Canoe Sprint World Championships 2018 Montemor-o-Velho Portugal Cycling - BMX UCI BMX World Championships 2018 Baku Azerbaijan Cycling - mountain bike UCI Mountain Bike World Championships 2018 Lenzerheide Switzerland Cycling - road UCI Road World Championships 2018 Innsbruck Austria Cycling - track UCI Track World Championships 2018 Apeldoorn Netherlands Equestrian FEI World Equestrian Games 2018 Tryon USA Fencing Fencing World Championships 2018 Wuxi China Field hockey Odisha Hockey Men's World Cup 2018 Bhubaneswar India Field hockey Vitality FIH Women's World Cup 2018 London United Kingdom Floorball IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 Prague Czech Republic Gymnastics - artistic Artistic Gymnastics World Championships 2018 Doha Qatar Gymnastics - rhythmic Rhythmic Gymnastics World Championship 2018 Sofia Bulgaria Judo World Judo Championships 2018 Baku Azerbaijan Modern pentathlon UIPM 2018 Pentathlon World Championships Mexico City Mexico Rowing World Rowing Championships 2018 Plovdiv Bulgaria Rugby sevens Rugby World Cup Sevens 2018 San Francisco USA Sailing Hempel Sailing World Championships Aarhus 2018 Aarhus Denmark Shooting ISSF Shooting World Championships 2018 Changwon Korea Soccer FIFA World Cup 2018 Various Russia Table tennis Liebherr World Team Table Tennis Championships 2018 Halmstad Sweden Volleyball FIVB Men's Volleyball World Championships 2018 Various Bulgaria / Italy Volleyball FIVB Women's Volleyball World Championships 2018 Various Japan Weightlifting World Weightlifting Championships 2018 Ashgabat Turkmenistan Wrestling UWW World Championships 2018 Budapest Hungary

ARISF federations’ world championships

SPORT EVENT CITY NATION Floorball IFF Men's World Floorball Championships 2018 Prague Czech Republic Karate World Karate Championships 2018 Madrid Spain Lacrosse FIL Men's World Lacrosse Championships 2018 Netanya Israel Orienteering Nokian Tyres World Orienteering Championships 2018 Riga Latvia Roller sports World Roller Speed Skating Championships 2018 Arnhem Netherlands Sport climbing IFSC World Championships 2018 Innsbruck Austria Ten-pin bowling WTBA World Tenpin Bowling Championships 2018 (Men's) Hong Kong Hong Kong Wakeboard IWWF Wakeboard World Championships 2017* Buenos Aires Argentina Waterskiing IWWF World Cableski Championships 2018 Dnipropetrovsk Ukraine * Event held in 2018

GSI EVENT STUDY / IFF MEN’S WORLD FLOORBALL CHAMPIONSHIPS 2018

Comparative Data Analysis GSI Events Index 2018

The IFF Men’s World Floorball Championships 2018 ranked 18th in Sportcal’s Global Sports Impact (GSI) Events Index 2018. The GSI Events Index is based on in-depth analysis of major multisport games and world championships to have taken place in any given year. 85 major sports events were included in the 2018 ranking.

Each event is given a weighting based on its GSI Event Rating. This rating is calculated using the latest event data across a range of indicators which measures the size, scale and impact of an event. The data considered covers the pillars of impact identified by the GSI Project methodology and scope of research.

GSI Events Index – Top 25 of 2018 events

GSI EVENT RANK SPORT EVENT CITY NATION RATING 1 Soccer FIFA World Cup 2018 Various Russia 8,223 2 Olympics Olympic Winter Games 2018 PyeongChang Korea 3,389 3 Games Commonwealth Games 2018 Gold Coast Australia 3,150 4 Games Asian Games 2018 Jakarta Indonesia 2,939 Germany / 5 Games European Championships 2018 Various 2,902 Scotland 6 Ice hockey IIHF World Championships 2018 Various Denmark 2,698 7 Paralympics Paralympic Winter Games 2018 PyeongChang Korea 2,501 8 Golf Ryder Cup 2018 Guyancourt France 2,323 9 Olympics Youth Olympic Games 2018 Buenos Aires Argentina 2,320 Bulgaria / 10 Volleyball FIVB Men's Volleyball World Championships 2018 Various 2,249 Italy 11 Equestrian FEI World Equestrian Games 2018 Tryon USA 2,227 12 Volleyball FIVB Women's Volleyball World Championships 2018 Various Japan 2,083 13 Rugby sevens Rugby World Cup Sevens 2018 San Francisco USA 2,024 United 14 Athletics IAAF 17th World Indoor Athletics Championships 2018 Birmingham 1,883 Kingdom 15 Basketball FIBA Women's Basketball World Cup 2018 Various Spain 1,876 United 16 Field hockey Vitality FIH Women's World Cup 2018 London 1,838 Kingdom 17 Cycling - road UCI Road World Championships 2018 Innsbruck Austria 1,780 Czech 18 Floorball IFF Men's World Floorball Championships 2018 Prague 1,704 Republic 19 Sport climbing IFSC World Championships 2018 Innsbruck Austria 1,692 Cycling - mountain 20 UCI Mountain Bike World Championships 2018 Lenzerheide Switzerland 1,633 bike 21 Wrestling UWW World Championships 2018 Budapest Hungary 1,600 22 Sailing Hempel Sailing World Championships Aarhus 2018 Aarhus Denmark 1,526 23 Cricket ICC Women's World Twenty20 2018 Various Various 1,524 24 Field hockey Odisha Hockey Men's World Cup 2018 Bhubaneswar India 1,507 25 Cycling - cyclo-cross UCI Cyclo-Cross World Championships 2018 Valkenburg Netherlands 1,476

SPORTCAL GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS LTD.

[email protected] | www.sportcal.com

London Office Switzerland Office John Carpenter House Maison du Sport International 7 Carmelite Street Avenue de Rhodanie 54 London 1007 Lausanne EC4Y 0BS Switzerland United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0) 20 8944 8786 Tel: +41 (0) 21 310 0740 Fax: +44 (0) 20 8944 8740 Fax: +41 (0) 21 310 0741

Registered in England and Wales.

IFF Strategy for the period 2021-2032 Appendix 14 Working Process

The present IFF Strategy, approved by the IFF General Assembly 2008 in Prague, set the objectives for IFF until 2020. The history of IFF can be divided into two phases – until 1998 IFF worked to justify our existence and receive official recognition. In the second phase IFF then worked to strengthen our operations, competitions, members services and international position with multi-sport participation until today. Now IFF is moving into its third development phase, which we need to define together.

The objectives set in the vision statement in 1998 has for most parts been achieved, with the development of an own Brand Identity, becoming recognised and growing International Federation with an attractive Sport for all, increased visibility and participation in the World Games and regional multi-sport games. IFF is near to reach also the following objectives, like increased awareness, SoMe visibility, TV visibility and very close to having the 75-80 members by the end of 2020. However, IFF has not reached the following objectives with increased financial resources, increased number of players and the reaching the Olympic Games.

As the overall objective to reach the Olympic Games at the moment seems still very far away, due to the recent changes made by the IOC, we are now in the situation that we have to re-define our main objectives and the path forward, a process which started in connection to the Wroclaw World Games preparation process. The success in the preparations and execution of The World Games 2017 and the IFF World Floorball Championships 2018 in Prague, Czech Republic puts us in a totally new situation. We have proven the sports capability to succeed in an International Multi-Sport games both on and off the field of play and the Floorball Community testified a World Championship of top of the class in Prague 2018.

The IFF has as an organisation grown substantially during the period, both in numbers of members (now 72), number of players (close to 370.000 registered and 4 mill. recreational players) and number of employees (8 FTE). The growth brings both possibilities and challenges. We are able to provide more and broader service to our members, but at the same time the growth of Floorball demands stricter rules to be able to manage and control the development. In order to be able to continue growing and through this also reaching our set targets, IFF needs more financial and human resources. One key success factor will be to strengthen the outside funding of the development and breaking the glass roof, to convince sponsors to see the opportunity our sport can offer. There is unfortunately a substantial number of member associations with debts to the IFF, which puts the IFF operations under pressure. We are not able to fully utilise our potential in service of our members due to the lack of financial resources.

It is not enough that the IFF organisation wants to develop the Sport of Floorball globally, the whole community needs to have the same objective. IFF has a challenge to find organisers for the different level Events IFF is organising, especially as we need to move out of Europe with also the Major Events. There are too few who are utilizing the possibility provided in the affiliation and active cooperation with the NOC’s and National Sport Confederations. We need to take the next step forward on the International Sports Scene. History has shown, that the market value of the sport can only continue growing on a national level, if the sport continues to develop also on an International level.

The Creation of a new Strategy for IFF 2021-2032

The IFF and Floorball is facing a number of challenges in the coming years and have already started the process of looking over the Future of Floorball when it comes to the game format. The Implementation of the IFF License System 2.0 and the change of the development programme in line with the Tier system and establishing of the format for the New European Floorball Championships 2023 are important steps in defining how and in which direction Floorball shall be developed. The aim with the Strategy Process is to tie together the game format testing and the vision for the floorball movement. As a part of this process are the preparations for The World Games 2021 in Birmingham, Alabama and the introduction and popularisation of Floorball in the region together with the USFbA.

The aim with the Strategy Process is to create a more Operational Strategy for the whole Floorball Community for the coming years and not a vast Principle Philosophical Document. The main focus shall be on what direction IFF shall take in the coming period, specify what the objectives shall be and how to reach this, so that it helps to grow and develop the sport on the local, national and international level.

The work for the new Strategy will start during the autumn of 2019, with the objective to prepare for the member associations discussions during the IFF Association Meeting concerning the common view of the direction of IFF’s future. The process will start with a number of questions that are listed below which will be asked widely with-in the Floorball Community, to build a broad base for the discussions. The results of the initial interviews and the Association Meeting outcome, will act as the base for the preparation of the IFF Strategic vision for 2021-2032.

The Process shall be led by a Task Force consisting of IFF CB members, Member Associations representatives, other stakeholders and the IFF Office. The Task Force will make two preliminary submissions to the Floorball Community, with the first in April and the second in August in 2020, which both will be scrutinised by the following entities: the member associations, IFF Committees, Outside stakeholder groups (Elite teams, Leagues, Athletes, Fans, Media, Sponsors, Coaches and referees). The objective is to build a broad based picture in which direction the Sport World is moving towards, what future scenarios and trends will affect and challenge our future

The IFF CB will based on the feedback from the different control groups prepare the final version for the IFF General Assembly by the end of September 2020.

Initial questions

In order to start the process IFF would like to ask you to give your valuable views looking forward to the following questions of what directions we shall take for the future. Your answers will form the platform from where we will start the strategy process and define the basic building blocks for the Strategy and the Direction Forward of Floorball.

What do you think Floorball will look like in 2032 in regards to the following factors? - Sport presentation - The IFF Organisation - Number of members - IFF Competitions – World Championships, Regional Championships, Multi-Sport Games, National competitions - Number of players - Awareness - Market value

What are we striving for – what does Floorball’s ideal future look like? - Participation in Olympic Games? - Participation in Youth Olympic Games? - Among Top3 biggest sport in more than 10-15 countries? - Participation in Regional Multi-Sport Games (Asian Games, PanAm Games, Euro Games etc. - Over 100 member associations - Other, please specify

In your mind what are A) the three most important Success factors for future Floorball development and B) which are the three least important Success factors for future Floorball development: - Increased awareness (National/International) - Increased visibility - Becoming a Global International Sport - An interesting game - New game innovations - International development - National development - Accessibility to play - Inclusion of Floorball Internationally - Spreading of the Sport - Equality - Fun to Play - Relatively inexpensive sport - Good Governance

What shall IFF do to strengthen the International Development?

What is the ideal form for cooperation between the IFF and its member associations?

Is there a way of combining National needs with International needs and if so how?

What type of development will drive International Development?

What are we striving for and what could be the objective for 2032? Please name at least one per field: - Awareness - Visibility - Service level - Sport Development - Expansion - Sport Presentation - Sport Appearance - Sport Culture - Sport Leadership

If not the Olympics – then what is the Raison d’etre for IFF?

Review of Governance of International Federation Members of ARISF and AIMS 2018-19

Report of self-assessed and moderated scores for: International Floorball Federation

Date of main moderation exercise: 24/01/2019

Background Section No. Indicator and detail IF response 3 ARISF or AIMS ARISF Please indicate whether you consider that your IF complies with the following: 4 The IOC Olympic Charter and in particular the missions set out in Rule 26 of the Olympic Charter Yes 5 The WADA Code and whether WADA has officially confirmed your compliance Yes 6 Your IF either implements the IOC Code of Ethics or the IF has its own Code of Ethics Yes 7 Your IF either complies with the Olympic Movement Code against the Manipulation of Sport Competitions or Yes the IF has enacted its own Code to address betting, match-fixing and the manipulation of competitions 8 Your IF complies with all applicable domestic laws of the country where it is registered and/or operates its main Yes activities 9 Please indicate what type of legal entity the IF is: Voluntary association • Voluntary association • Company limited by shares • Company limited by guarantee • Other (please specify) o e.g. charity 10 Please indicate what separate entities are associated with the IF and the legal association to the IF (e.g. a 0 wholly-owned subsidiary limited company that owns marketing rights)

11 In which country does your IF have its legal base? In Switzerland, in accordance with the IFF Statutes Art. 3 https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/ 01/IFF_STATUTES_Edition_2018.pdf 12 How many full-time equivalent paid staff does the IF have, including contractors? 5-9 • 0 or less than 1 • 1-4

• 5-9 • 10-19 • 20-49 • 50-119 • 120+ 13 What was the approximate annual revenue (CHF) of the IF and its subsidiaries averaged over the 2012-2015 <2 million cycle (not including continental federations or members)? • <2 million • 2m-4m • >4m and <8m • 8m – 20m • 20m – 50m • >50m (The years are 2012-2015 for consistency with the ASOIF study in 2017-18)

Transparency Section Self-assessed score / evidence Moderated score / evidence Please indicate the extent to which your IF puts the following information into the public domain (i.e. via official website): 14 Statutes, rules and regulations 3 3 Score definitions 0 – No The present and valid version of the Statutes OK. 1 - At least some information available on IF website are published on the web-site: 2 - Latest version of statutes, rules and regulations https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 published on IF website 1/IFF_STATUTES_Edition_2018.pdf 3 - Full publication, easy to find on IF website 4 - Full publication, easy to find on IF website, latest versions available with mark ups identifying differences between previous versions 15 Vision, mission, values and strategic objectives 4 4 Score definitions 0 – No There are the full IFF Strategical Vision 2009 - OK. Long term strategic goals outliend in 1 - Some information published on IF website 2020 and the 2014 updated 2009-2020 Vision with tangible actions, with 2 - Full publication on IF Website IFF Strategical Vision 2009 - 2020 (Full evidence of tracking via 2014 "Half-Time" 3 - Full publication, easy to find on IF website version): report. 4 - Full publication, easy to find on IF website, extra https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2018/1 data or info such as strategic plan with 0/GA-2008-Enclosure-6a-The-IFF-Strategical- Plan of Action for 2019-20 also published indicators/outcomes Vision-2009-2020.pdf https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 IFF Strategical Vision 2009 - 2020 1/A8-IFF-Plan-of-Action-for-2019-2020.pdf Management Summary Half-Time Revision Update 2014: https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2018/1 0/Strategy-Management-Summary_Half- Time-Review_GA-decision-2014.pdf 16 A list of all national member federations with basic 4 4 information for each Score definitions 0 – No There are a list of the member associations OK. Members split into ordinary and 1 - Some member information published on IF and each country has an data sheet provisional members. website connected to them. 2 - Full publication of latest member information on https://floorball.sport/theiff/member- Extra detail includes participation numbers, IF website associations/ latest event participation and latest events 3 - Full publication, easy to find on IF website, basic held. See example from Germany. data on members https://floorball.sport/theiff/member- associations/

Transparency Section Self-assessed score / evidence Moderated score / evidence 4 - Full publication, easy to find on IF website, with https://floorball.sport/germany/ extra data or explanation about members 17 Details of elected officials with biographical info 3 1 Score definitions 0 – No We have chosen to have only the Names, OK. Only photos, names and emails listed. 1 - Some information about elected officials Photos and an valid email address for the https://floorball.sport/central-board-and- available on IF website Central Board members on the web. exco/ 2 - Biographical information about all elected https://floorball.sport/central-board/ officials published on IF website 3 - Full publication, easy to find on IF website, with photos 4 - Full publication, easy to find, on IF website with extra data or explanation and mandate years 18 Annual activity report and main events reports 4 4 Score definitions 0 – No The Annual Report and the Plan of Action OK. All documents can be downloaded 1 - Some news published on IF website which are approved by the IFF General https://floorball.sport/theiff/strategic- 2 - News published regularly and an annual report Assembly are published on the web. documents-and-policies/ available on IF website IFF Annual Report 2017-2018: 3 - News published regularly and multiple years of https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 Multiple reports available for 2015-16 and annual reports, easy to find on IF website 1/A3-Annual-Report-2017-2018.pdf 2017-18 so far, including Plan of Action for 4 - Full publication, easy to find on IF website, with IFF Annual Report 2015-2016: 2019-20. extra data or explanation with past reports (for https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2018/1 comparison) 0/A4_IFF-Annual-Report-2015-2016.pdf Noted that older documents are in the IFF Plan of Action 2019 - 2020: process of being transferred to new website. https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 1/A8-IFF-Plan-of-Action-for-2019-2020.pdf All the old reports and documents can then be found under the Meetings, which is still under the old web page - so presently they are harder to find, but we are in the process of moving them to the new site, which was only launched in October. http://www.floorball.org/pages/EN/General- Assembly-2018

Transparency Section Self-assessed score / evidence Moderated score / evidence 19 Annual financial reports following external audit 3 2 Score definitions 0 – No As we are rebuilding the IFF web page the old OK. Financial report from IFF available on new 1 - Some financial information published on IF files are on the old one, which at the moment website. See example from 2017. website are being redirected to the new one. We https://floorball.sport/theiff/strategic- 2 - Publication of externally audited financial reports have the Finances as a separate box under documents-and-policies/ on IF website organisation, but need to solve the problem https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 3 - Publication of audited financial reports, easy to between the old and new system. 1/A7-Financial-Report-2017.pdf find on IF website In the CB meetings the CB always approves a 4 - Publication of state of art audited financial financial report of the finances up to date, Auditor letter is available on old website. reports, easy to find on IF website, extra data, which is published as a part of the CB http://www.floorball.org/Liitetiedostot/GA/G management letter minutes. The example from the last CB A%202018/A6%20Audit%20Report%202017. meeting held on the 7.12. §4. Appendix 3 pdf http://www.floorball.org/pages/EN/CB- meeting-5-2018 But auditor letter does not contain financial Presently we have only the last approved statements. ones on the new web page: http://www.floorball.org/pages/EN/General- Assembly-2018 Here the financial and auditors reports are under §10 http://www.floorball.org/pages/EN/General- Assembly-2018 Financial Reports 2016 and 2017: 2016: http://www.floorball.org/Liitetiedostot/GA/G A%202018/A5%20Financial%20Report%2020 16.pdf and https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 1/A5-Financial-Report-2016.pdf 2017: http://www.floorball.org/Liitetiedostot/GA/G A%202018/A7%20Financial%20Report%2020 17.pdf and https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 1/A7-Financial-Report-2017.pdf

Transparency Section Self-assessed score / evidence Moderated score / evidence Auditors report 2016 and 2017: 2016: http://www.floorball.org/Liitetiedostot/GA/G A%202018/A4%20Audit%20Report%202016. pdf 2017: http://www.floorball.org/Liitetiedostot/GA/G A%202018/A6%20Audit%20Report%202017. pdf 20 Allowances and financial benefits of elected officials 3 3 and senior executives Score definitions 0 – No IFF does not pay any allowances or financial OK. Financial Regulations for 2019 publshed 1 - Some information on allowances and financial benefits to anyone of the elected officials. which has some relevant detail. Note that CB benefits of elected officials and senior executives The travel cost for the IFF President is paid by Members travel costs are paid for by 2 - Allowances, per diem and benefits of elected the IFF and this is done in accordance with associations and board and lodging paid for officials and senior executives published on IF the IFF Financial Regulation consisting of IFF where budget allows. website travel costs, but no per diem. 3 - Full details published including total figure paid Travel and board paid for committees paid for by the IF, easy to find on website The National Associations pays any possible by IFF where budget allows. 4 - Full details published, easy to find on IF website, per diem for the CB members from their with extra data or information country. Total costs for CB, Salaries and Committees listed in Financial Reports. The referees per diem, is defined in the IFF https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 Financial Regulations and the employes 1/Financial-Regulations-Edition-2019.pdf recieves the same for IFF Event, in accordance with the Finnish Tax Rules, as all employees are presently employed under Finnish law. The total salaries can be visible in the financial reports, but individual salareis are not disclosed at all.

IFF Financial Regulation; https://d3kfx7mdprc67r.cloudfront.net/2018 /06/Financial-Regulations-Edition-2018.pdf

Transparency Section Self-assessed score / evidence Moderated score / evidence 21 General Assembly agenda with relevant documents 3 3 (before) and minutes (after) with procedure for members to add items to agenda Score definitions 0 – No The Agenda of the IFF General Assembly and OK. Minutes for General Assembly 2018 1 - Some information published on General all the items and documents are sent to the published on new website. Assembly member associations a minimum of 30 days https://floorball.sport/theiff/strategic- 2 - General Assembly agenda published in advance, prior to the IFF GA. The documents are documents-and-policies/ minutes afterwards or live streaming which is approved by the IFF CB and visible in the IFF recorded CB minutes. Archive of minutes on old website under 3 - General Assembly full details published with IFF CB Minutes where all documents have http://www.floorball.org/pages/EN/Meetings minutes, easy to find on IF website been approved : 4 - Full publication and live streaming (recorded), http://www.floorball.org/pages/EN/CB- Understand that the process of moving old easy to find on IF website, extra data or information, meeting-4-2018 congress minutes is in process. minutes archive The members recieve an Announcement of the IFF General Assembly 90 days prior the IFF GA, where they are given the possibility to propose motions and nominations for the GA. This document is published in the news and can also be found in the published CB minutes §4, Appendix 5: http://www.floorball.org/pages/EN/CB- meeting-3-2018 The minutes of the IFF General Assembly are published in a news and then visible on the IFF web page: https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 1/IFF-General-Assembly-2018-minutes- signed.pdf

Integrity and Democracy Section Self-assessed score / evidence Moderated score / evidence Please indicate the extent to which you consider that your IF fulfils the following: 22 Has a unit or officer in charge of ensuring that the IF 3 3 abides by the IOC Code of Ethics and/or the IF’s own Code of Ethics Score definitions 0 – No The IFF has an own Ethics Commission OK. Code of Ethics Published. 1 - A designated individual staff member/officer has elected by the IFF General Assembly, which https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2018/1 responsibility for Code of Ethics compliance has the role to ensure follows its code. §14 0/IFF-Code-of-Ethics.pdf 2 - Designated responsibility and a defined process http://www.floorball.org/pages/EN/General- for Code of Ethics compliance Assembly-2018 Minutes of last Ethics Commission meeting 3 - Designated responsibility and a defined process The IFF Ethics Commission has the task to published on old website. for Code of Ethics compliance, evidence of follow-up on the issues related to Code of implementation Ethics Compliance: Last meeting notes of the Also see Annual Report - which refers to 4 - State of the art unit and process for Code of IFF Ethics Commission from 2017, as the ones Ethics Commission actiity in 2018. Ethics compliance, evidence of implementation, from the 2018 yearly meeting will only be https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 outcomes published published after the next CB meeting: 1/A3-Annual-Report-2017-2018.pdf http://www.floorball.org/Liitetiedostot/CB/C B%202017%20December/Appex%2019%20- %20IFF%20ETC%20meeting%202017%20repo rt.pdf The report exists and is approved by the ETC members from the meeting held on the 9.12.2018 in Prague, but is not yet published, as not reported to the IFF CB yet. 23 Appropriate gender balance in governing bodies 2 2 Score definitions 0 - Female representation is no more than 5% of The IFF has presently 2 women out of 11 OK. Also see Equality Policy and Action Plan. Executive Board and Council or equivalent members in our Central Board and 1 out 5 in https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2018/1 1 - Female representation is more than 5% but no our Executive Committee 0/IFF-Equality-Policy-2016.pdf more than 15% https://floorball.sport/central-board/ https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2018/1 2 - Female representation is at least 15% with The IFF has in its statutes defined that IFF 0/IFF-Equality-Action-Plan-2016-17.pdf rules/policy to encourage gender balance strives to secure a broad representation of 3 - Female representation is at least 25% with both genders in, all of its Bodies, ART 30.4. rules/policy to encourage gender balance https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 1/IFF_STATUTES_Edition_2018.pdf

Integrity and Democracy Section Self-assessed score / evidence Moderated score / evidence 4 - Executive Board and Council include at least 40% of each gender with rules/policy to encourage gender balance 24 Election of the President and a majority of members 4 3 of all executive bodies Score definitions 0 – No The President and the member of the IFF OK. 1 - Some elections but for limited number of roles Central Board are voted based in an election 2 - Elections for president and majority of members if there are more candidates than seats Voting numbers published on old website for of executive bodies available. 2016 minutes - scrutineers are elected from 3 - Elections for president and majority of roles, Floorball associations (i.e. not external). voting numbers published The Athlethes Commission Chair is then 4 - Elections for president and majority of roles, elected by the Central Board based on the voting numbers published, external scrutiny Athlethes Commission elections made by the Athlethes in the Men's and Women's World Floorball Championships.

This is defined by the statutes in ART 27, ART 29, ART 30https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019 /01/IFF_STATUTES_Edition_2018.pdf As the term of Office is four years and the previous election was held in 2016 for the period of 2017-2020 IFF GA Minutes. http://www.floorball.org/pages/EN/General- Assembly-2016 25 Term limits for elected officials 2 1 Score definitions 0 – No IFF has included the maximum term for Article 30.5 - No more than three consecutive 1 - Some term limits but possibility of multiple re- elected officials in our Statutes: with no more terms of four years, starting from 2024 elections to the same position than 12 in one role. Elections. The General Assembly can decide 2 - Term limits in place with a maximum of no more https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 for an exception of one term. than 12 years in 1 role 1/IFF_STATUTES_Edition_2018.pdf 3 - Term limits in place with a maximum of 3 x 4 year cumulative terms in the same or multiple roles

Integrity and Democracy Section Self-assessed score / evidence Moderated score / evidence 4 - Term limits with a max of 3 x 4 year terms in same or multiple roles, waiting period before new role 26 Provide for the representation of key stakeholders 3 3 (e.g. “active” athletes as defined in the Olympic Charter) in governing bodies Score definitions 0 – No IFF has the Athlethes Commission Chair as a OK. 1 - Some representation of key stakeholders in member of the IFF Central Board and IFF ATC governing bodies has a member in the Rules and Competition Cooperation body with equipment 2 - Designated key stakeholder representatives in Committee and the Referee Committee. ART manufacturers is an example of good governing bodies (not consultative) 33 practice. 3 - Representation of key stakeholders including https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 athlete(s) on Executive Board 1/IFF_STATUTES_Edition_2018.pdf IFF also 4 - State of art athlete and other key stakeholder have a cooperation body with the Floorball representation Equipment manufacturers - Material Borad, that discuss the development of Floorball equipment and the IFF Material Regulation. 27 Defined conflict of interest policy with exclusion of 3 3 members with a manifest, declared or perceived conflict Score definitions 0 – No The IFF has a Conflict of Interest Policy OK. Form included as part of the published 1 - Some conflict of interest rules https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2018/1 policy. There is a reference to the overall 2 - Defined conflict of interest policy 0/IFF-Conflict-of-Interest_Confidentiality- Register of Interests - but not published 3 - Defined conflict of interest policy, evidence of policy-and-guidelines.pdf online. implementation 4 - State of the art conflict of interest policy, checked against register and evidence of implementation

Development and Control Mechanisms Section Self-assessed score / evidence Moderated score / evidence Please indicate the extent to which you consider that your IF fulfils the following: 28 Education programmes and assistance to coaches, 4 4 judges, referees and athletes Score definitions 0 – No IFF runs a series of development seminars for OK. Evidence of activity through seminars, 1 - At least some educational support for coaches, coaches, referees and the organisation of the which are held regularly (calendar published). judges, referees and athletes clubs and national federations. These are Seminars can cover topics on governance, 2 - Education programme and assistance for conducted by IFF experts and are free of refereeing and coaching. coaches, judges, referees and athletes charge for the participants, as IFF pays for the 3 - Education programme and assistance for lecturers. A form is also published for applications. coaches, judges, referees and athletes with details https://floorball.sport/development/develop https://d3kfx7mdprc67r.cloudfront.net/2018 published ment-programme/ /07/FDS-Program.pdf 4 - State of the art education programme for coaches, judges, referees and athletes with details There is a lot of materials available on the IFF Overview of annual development activity published web page for both the seminars and then outlined in annual report technical documents for coaching and https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 refereeing. 1/A3-Annual-Report-2017-2018.pdf https://floorball.sport/materials/downloads/ We also have built a generic School Curriculum for PE teatchers, which can also be found under materials. 29 Anti-discrimination policies on racial, religious or 3 3 sexual orientation Score definitions 0 – No The IFF has approved our anti-discrimination OK. Also see Equality Policy: 1 - Recognition of antidiscrimination issues in official policy and have so far only needed to use it in https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2018/1 documents advising our members. We have not had any 0/IFF-Equality-Policy-2016.pdf 2 - Official antidiscrimination policy or policies in alledged cases of harrasment so far. place https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2018/1 3 - Anti-discrimination policy/ policies covering all 0/IFF-Discrimination-Harrasment-and-Abuse- characteristics, evidence of Implementation Policy-Statement-1.pdf 4 - State of the art antidiscrimination policies, https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2018/1 evidence of implementation, results published 0/IFF-Guidelines-on- DiscriminationHarrasment.pdf

Development and Control Mechanisms Section Self-assessed score / evidence Moderated score / evidence 30 Establish an internal ethics committee with 4 4 independent representation Score definitions 0 – No The IFF Ethics Commission consists of a Char OK. Majority of independent members. 1 - Some monitoring of ethical behaviour and three members all elected by the IFF 2 - Ethics committee with independent General Assembly. The Char and two of the Minutes from meeting published on old representation in place to monitor application of members are not in any way related to IFF, website. ethics rules but are all CAS judges and active in sport http://www.floorball.org/Liitetiedostot/CB/C 3 - Ethics committee with majority independent otherwise. The third member is the secretary B%202017%20December/Appex%2019%20- representation in place, can propose sanctions general of a member association, but has no %20IFF%20ETC%20meeting%202017%20repo 4 - State of the art ethics committee, independent other tasks in IFF. rt.pdf majority, starts investigations, proposes sanctions The Ethics Commission has had a few Also see Annual Report - evidence of activity. complaints to work on and has also then https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 made the investigation around the topic. The 1/A3-Annual-Report-2017-2018.pdf ETC can propose sanctions to the IFF Diciplinary Committee, which then makes the decision of a sanction. https://floorball.sport/theiff/committees/ethi cs-commission/ 31 Adopt policies and processes for internal control 2 2 Score definitions 0 – No As IFF publishes all financial reports and has OK. Evidence of financial activity monitoring 1 - Some systems in place for internal control and/or very descriptive CB minutes and in addition through CB Meetings, where financial reports risk management publish meeting reports and event reports, it are regularly presented. (Minutes are still on 2 - Official procedure in place for internal control should be enough with the reporting old website). and risk management mechanisms we have at least for today. http://www.floorball.org/pages/EN/CB- 3 - Official procedure in place for internal control http://www.floorball.org/pages/EN/CB- meeting-5-2018 and risk management, evidence of implementation meeting-4-2018 4 - State of the art internal control and risk http://www.floorball.org/pages/EN/CB- management procedure, evidence of meeting-5-2018 implementation 32 Awarding of main events follows an open and 3 3 transparent process Score definitions 0 – No The process for application to host Major OK. Use of external software in evaluating 1 - Some information published about process for events is sent out four years prior to the bids. See section in 2017-18 Annual report on awarding main events organisation of the Event. The bidders for the software (7.6 IFF Event Management Tool)

Development and Control Mechanisms Section Self-assessed score / evidence Moderated score / evidence 2 - Process for awarding main events with rules Event are all invited to provide their bid in our https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 including criteria, fair timetables, outcomes Event Management System - Eventello's 1/A3-Annual-Report-2017-2018.pdf published Bidding tool, based on which a group of 12-15 3 - Process for awarding events, rules include persons rank the bids on a pre-set scale in the Limited information on evaluation criteria or criteria, fair timetables, shortlisting or rotation tool. The result of the evaluation is then application form, but Organisers Manual 4 - Process for awarding events, rules include presented to the IFF CB which based on this provides detailed infromation on criteria, fair timetables, shortlisting or rotation, with makes the decision to appoint the organiser requirements to host an event. element of external bidding assessment for the Adult World Championships. https://d3kfx7mdprc67r.cloudfront.net/2018 /06/IFF-Organiser-Regulations-2017.pdf I can't just now open the Bidding Tool in Eventello for this form, but if you want we News story announcing bid process can grant access to it, so you can see how it https://floorball.sport/2018/10/11/iff-looks- works. for-organisers-to-host-u19-wfc-2021-and- 2022/ For the other events the U19 World Championships are analysed with Eventello And example news story announcing host and the qualifications to the WFC's and all https://floorball.sport/2018/12/08/mens- other events are based on discussions wth wfc-2022-to-be-played-in-switzerland/ the applicants. We don't have enough organisers as it is! 33 Internal decisions can be appealed with final 3 3 recourse to the Court of Arbitration for Sport Score definitions 0 – No We have included the right to appeal to CAS OK. 1 - Some opportunity for external Appeals in the Statutes in ART 54 No cases has yet 2 - Right of appeal for some internal decisions to CAS been taken to CAS in Floorball, conserning the or similar IFF or our actions. 3 - Right of appeal in statutes for all relevant internal https://dltaw1vhj9zy5.cloudfront.net/2019/0 decisions to CAS, evidence of implementation 1/IFF_STATUTES_Edition_2018.pdf 4 - Right of appeal in statutes for all relevant decisions to CAS, implementation, outcomes published

Summary Section

Overview of scores Section Maximum possible Self-assessed score Moderated score score Transparency 32 27 24 Integrity and Democracy 24 17 15 Development and Control Mechanisms 24 19 19

Total 80 63 58 Average score per indicator 4 3.15 2.9 Group A1

Distribution of scores Indicator score Number of indicators that achieved this score 0 0 1 2 2 3 3 10 4 5 Total 20

Overview of IF groups based on total moderated scores across all IFs (54) Group Number of IFs Range of total score A1 5 58 – 65 A2 11 45 – 53 B 24 28 – 41 C 14 10 – 26 The maximum theoretical score is 80. Due to the scoring method, percentages should not be used. The margin of error for the total moderated score is estimated at -3 to +3. For further details, see the study of all ARISF and AIMS members published by www.gaisf.sport

How your IF compares with all 54 IFs 80

60 58

Key Group A1 Group A2 Group B Group C International Floorball Federation

How your IF compares with IFs of a similar size

Comparison of mean scores by section with IFs with similar number of staff Section 5 – 9 staff International Floorball Federation (5-9) Transparency 22.86 24 Integrity and Democracy 14.57 15 Development and Control Mechanisms 13.86 19

Total score 51.29 58

Comparison of mean scores by section with IFs with comparable levels of revenue Section < 2m CHF annual International Floorball revenue Federation (<2 million) Transparency 15.16 24 Integrity and Democracy 10.09 15 Development and Control Mechanisms 9.53 19

Total score 34.78 58

How your IF compares with IFs with similar number of staff

60 58

Key Group A1 Group A2 Group B Group C International Floorball Federation

Overview of IF scores categorised by revenue groups 70

60 58

Key

<2m CHF >2m CHF International Floorball Federation

Selected points

Overall • International Floorball Federation is in Group A1 • IFF scores higher than the average compared to other IFs with 5-9 staff • IFF scores significantly higher than the average compared to other IFs with under 2m CHF in annual revenue (many of the IFs in this category were substantially under the 2m CHF threshold) • Generally consistent all-round • Good level of detail published despite ongoing migration of information from old website to new website at the time of the review

Strengths • The IFF’s performance would be competitive with some Olympic IFs • The IFF’s activity in some areas could be included in a list of good practice examples for ARISF and AIMS members • The IFF’s self-assessment proved quite accurate

Areas for improvement • Indicators with a score of 1 would merit attention

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of SportAccord APPENDIX 17

Report RACC 10.06.2019

1) RACC a. Meeting will be 21-22.09.2019 (probably Prague) Meeting will be held 21-22 of September (late than normal due to office schedule in combination with vacations) Main topics will be about the different parts in Future Of Floorball, overview of how to handle qualifications to WFC in connection to Euro Floorball Championships, IFF test tournaments, National federation tests and topic from last CB-meeting regarding uneven results in some WFC qualification matches involving the top 4 ranked teams.

2) Future of floorball a. Tests There have come some proposals of tests that we so far have granted due to that they follow the given guidelines. b. IFF Tests As we discussed in Malaga in the last meeting I think we should continue with the plan of do testing for: 2019/2020 for following IFF tournaments: RACC proposes EFCh 2020/2021 for following possible IFF tournaments: EFC, WFCQ and Student Championship and that we use the basic rules (see page 2). RACC will discuss and come back with a proposal to the CB/ExCo in the end of September.

3) Other a. U19 in Canada First, it was good to see a new country winning the championship  Tournament had a lot of new challenges then we ever had before – reports on this will be in other parts of the meeting

Address: Phone: E-mail: Competition Manager: Event Manager: Alakiventie 2 +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] Stefan Kratz Sarah Mitchell FI-00920 Helsinki, Fax: Web-site [email protected] [email protected] Finland +358 9 454 214 50 www.floorball.org +46 70 677 8646 +358 400 529 035

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of SportAccord APPENDIX 17

APPLICATION FOR TESTING FUTURE ELEMENTS Below you will find the numbers stated in the Rules of the Game regarding number of players, officials, game time etc., what was used in The World Games 2017 and what IFF will test. In the last column you shall fill in what you want to test (which can differ from the rules, what was used in TWG and what IFF will test).

If you want to test any other element than number of players, officials and game time you should in addition to this form add a separate description on how you plan to perform the test.

Your application for testing shall be sent in latest 15.05.2019 to [email protected]

The basic topics for the test are: Game rules The World Games IFF test National 2017 (according to Association GA 2018) – We want to test Number of Players in Team Rooster 20 14 17

Number of Officials in Team Rooster 5 *1+3 5

Game time and/or number of periods 3x20 mins 3x15 mins 3x15 mins

Any other element, we would like to test: Number of Referees 2 2 2 Goal Referees 0 0 0 Intermission time 10 mins 10 mins 10 mins Penalty length (in relation to game time) 2, 5, 10 min 2, 5, 10 min 2, 5, 10 min Field of Play (size) 40x20 40x20 40x20

Other* (Please define here or separately) *1 ordinary, 3 extra

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

IFF Report from the WADA ADO Symposium

WADA ADO Symposium 2019 Lausanne, 12-14 March IFF representatives: Merita Bruun & Agata Plechan (ATC)

Main topics: World Anti-Doping Code 2021, International Standards review and Athlete involvement (75 athlete representatives attended)

1. 2021 World Anti-Doping Code draft • The Code will continue to be more flexible • New Code to be approved at the World Conference in Katowice, Poland, in November 2019 • Code will come into force January 1st 2021 2. Anti-Doping Charter of Athlete Rights (new document) • The goal of the Charter, is to clearly outline athlete rights with respect to the fight against doping in sport. While athletes’ responsibilities towards clean sport are set out in the World Anti-Doping Code, the Charter aims to further support athletes worldwide in the right to compete in clean, ethical and fair sport (eg. athletes’ rights to anti-doping education and a fear hearing) 3. International Standard for Results Management (new document) • This is a new document but the content as such is not all new, as these rules have previously been included in the Code and International Standard of Testing • The notification process to an athlete of an ADRV will in the future be divided into two phases, the first including the initial notification and asking for an explanation from the athlete. IFF considers this as a positive change (not too much information to the athletes in one notification) • There will also be more focus on having ADO independent hearing panels 4. International Standard for Education (new document) • More focus is constantly put on education and all ADOs are to have an anti-doping education plan that needs to be evaluated regularly • The IFF has commented on this draft document that testing and education shouldn’t necessarily always go hand in hand (meaning that all events that there is testing, there should be mandatory education). This point has been taken into consideration in the current draft version, but the strong recommendation still is, that all player who are tested should have received anti-doping education beforehand. 5. International Standard for Code Compliance by Signatories (new document) • Outlines the rights and responsibilities of the Code Signatories and the ways in which WADA supports Signatories and a process for determining non-compliance and consequences. 6. International Standard for Testing and Investigations • More flexibility when it comes to testing menus for different low risk sports (eg. EPO analysis). More detailed guidelines about the different whereabouts pools and how much testing should take place for athletes in the different pools. ADOs should implement policies to facilitate whistle- blowers.

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 1

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

IFF needs to consider: • Follow the ongoing consultations and comment when there are issues that needs to be raised from the IFF point of view. • Even though event-based A-D education is not mandatory in the draft Standard of Education, the goal for each IF should be that all athletes that are tested should have received some anti-doping education before being tested. This means that the IFF should investigate its current testing and education activities and make the needed adjustments (increase education and/or reduce event testing). • Continue and further enforce athlete participation in the IFF anti-doping activities. Ask the IFF Athletes’ Commission for ideas about future anti-doping awareness campaigns. • Make possible adjustments to the current testing pool system. Continue NOT having a Registered Testing Pool (with individual athlete whereabouts), but maybe re-consider the size of the current Testing Pool (top 3 teams). This because all players in a Testing Pool should according to the draft ISTI be tested at least once in a year. • Look into how the IFF should implement policies to facilitate whistle-blowing (currently WADA’s Speak Up platform is promoted, but do we need to have and own platform/system?) • The Code and the International Standards will be approved by the WADA Executive Committee and Foundation Board on the final day of the World Conference of Doping in Sport 2019 (7th of November). The year 2020 will therefore be the year when all IFs need to adapt to the new rules. • The new World Anti-Doping Code enters into force January 1st 2021 when all IFs should have their new rules and procedures in place.

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 2

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF Appendix 19

Marketing Function Report/Tero Kalsta 10.6.2019

Sales Overview

Based on the conclusion made earlier this year the sales focus has switched to countries where the sport is well established and represented (e.g. international brands from the Nordic countries) or with international brands which have already worked with floorball on a national level or as LOC partners in WFC’s.

Sales Status

There has not been any development on the timing partner side. The contact with G-Shock (Casio) has not proved to be active or shown great interest.

On the sports apparel side we are currently still in discussions with two companies. Hummel is still interested in floorball and consider it a serious option from 2020 onwards. Floorball has been identified by them as a strategically important sport in their strong markets (Nordics). Having said that, the evaluation process for sponsorship agreements does not only include floorball but also other new sports. I have constantly updated them with information. I have also been in regular contact with Puma and reinitiated the case with sight on 2020 on-wards. A clear stand on whether or not they are considering us (or any new) sponsorship has not been taken. Interesting development has been seen in Denmark as the national federation just struck a deal with Select whom extends from football for the first time to floorball.

On the title and main sponsoring front there are over 90 contacts made and this year several new leads have been created to keep the pool of potential broad. The best leads at the time have been established with  AJ products (on-going contact)  HMD Global (Nokia phones / Miko Paassilta, Nordic Marketing Manager)  Fysioline / Ice Power (muscle gel)  Superpark (indoor activity parks)

The contacted brands vary from fast food, snacks, drinks, travel industry to consumer electronics (phones, headphones, loudspeakers).

Our two sales partners have been working on their contacts. In Finland he is trying to open two fronts (Lidl international and Tallink Silja). The companies our Swiss partner has contacted (Nestlé Suisse, Mars Schweiz, Mondelez (Toblerone), Victorinox, L’Oreal Suisse, Café Chicco d’Oro) have not shown interest in cooperation.

The results with our current sales partners have not been satisfactory. We have established contact with a sales agency called Protocol Sports Marketing. Based on the material (surveys + sales material) delivered to them they see good potential of selling floorball as a product in their portfolio. Negotiations are on-going in early June.

While trying to sell a Main Sponsor there are also some offers made regarding the Champions Cup 2020. The floorball manufacturers Unihoc, Oxdog and Salming have been contacted.

Marketing Status

I have offered articles about the current success of floorball to Scandinavian business magazines and publications. Another Nordic approach is to find a solution for conducting direct mailing (e- mail) for Scandinavian brands.

The editorial (paid) article published by SportsProMagazine in November has reached best views in our LinkedIn feed. The topic is how to tackle the paradox of being a growing sport with good

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki, Finland +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Page 1

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

proven figures (spectators, tv-reach, Youtube views/minutes, SoMe reach) but not attracting new sponsoring partners.

An investigation about utilizing affiliate networks to create some additional revenue through banner advertising on our homepage is on-going (Tradetracker). The results of the fan-survey help to find the correct target group however one challenge is the big volatility in our web-traffic (high traffic during WFCs and rather low outside of the WFCs).

The fan survey was supplemented in April with answers from the Czech Republic. Attached find the updated summary of the results. There are no breakthroughs as such however the results validate us several things that we have before self-defined as being facts. Going forward these are facts to back up sales negotiations. Results are published early June.

Another target in branding is to make our social responsibility brand stronger. We will utilize the outcome of the survey to develop this further. For many brands this is a major factor in decision- making. For this there are two main topics (and two sub-topics):  A very fitting organization from the IFF perspective would be the World Health Organization (WHO)). The WHO has published physical activity recommendations, and this is something the IFF also wants to promote. There are also some potential partners who share the support of this ideology (Superpark, ValoMotion). There are also great results in Denmark within their “Movement for life” project which can be used in this  Environment / recycling: a campaign to collect old floorball material (blades, balls, drinking bottles) in cooperation with recycling cooperatives and/or plastic products manufacturers. Unihoc has interest in this topic as it is part of their strategy  Identify and contact brands which share our #GoGirls project values (e.g. P&G (Always), Essity)  According to the fan-survey the best fit to the values of our fans are the following benefit organizations o Unicef, Red Cross

Other on-going projects include:  Reference cases (video) from current sponsors o published in early May / part of promotional material  Gathering best-case scenarios from national level (i.e. Pantamera in Sweden, WFC2018 success cases (Gerflor/Street Floorball League))  How to leverage our social media platforms for sponsors with most impact (planning with Mari Myllärinen) => e.g. for Ice Power campaigns

In the CCMNG meeting in May will went through the fan survey and Sportcal GSI results and the importance of utilizing them in our sales and marketing efforts. The countries also shared several on-going cases which will be shared and support the other countries. To point out a few, Finland is developing sponsor sales concepts together with the league teams and Switzerland is focusing how to target the big mass (400 000) of recreational players. A further topic was the future of monetizing the broadcasting rights of the WFCs, which approach and with which partners. This will be an on-going topic. Roughly half of respondents from the fan survey are prepared to invest into pay-tv.

Environmental aspects are also being considered for marketing and sales purposes. The experiences from the EcoCompass-project in WFC2015 are being evaluated for future implementation cases. The topic has been touched how to integrate this in WFC 2020.

Our partner school for the fan survey (Glion School of Higher Education) has offered us the possibility to conduct further projects with their students (start after the summer). After two years since the launch of the new IFF brand image one potential topic could be to evaluate how well it

Page 2

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF Appendix 19

has been established / is being recognized / is being perceived (comparison to old) and how well is has served the purpose for which the renewal process was initiated for.

Further some new perspectives for marketing have been worked on (also discussed at the CCMNG). Mr Kalsta has discussed with a company which produces digital brand activation services (Uplause (www.uplause.com)). The aim is to create more activation elements in IFF channels e.g MVP voting for Youtube/IFF Events app as well as the venue such as voting, decibel-meter, Jumbotron social wall, kiss-cam, etc. All these elements can be partner branded/customized. This will be discussed with Unihoc as a concrete development topic for the WFC 2020 (with the understanding that they will need to invest). This dialogue will be led further to see if we could strike a general agreement with Uplause for IFF to aid LOCs and national federations to utilize these kinds of services.

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki, Finland +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Page 3

29/05/2019

General outlines

• Carried out in December 2018 and April 2019 • Conducted by Glion Institute of Higher Education (CH) final year students • Online survey platform (SurveyHero) • Number of respondents ~1800 • Distribution via national floorball federation channels and IFF digital channels • IFF, Finland, Germany, Norway, Poland, Sweden, Switzerland, Czech Republic

1 29/05/2019

Gender

Age range

2 29/05/2019

Age range analysis

⚫ Almost 60% of the respondents are under 30

⚫ The core target group similar as in IFF social media channel demographics (13-35)

⚫ The result constitutes that there is also good purchase power (28- 55) in the floorball community (see Employment status)

⚫ Gender split resembles that of IFF SoMe channels

Relationship to floorball (multiple choice)

3 29/05/2019

Employment status

Floorball as a sport How strongly do you associate the following adjectives to floorball as a sport? (1-5)

Most descriptive: Fast (4,8) Energetic (4,57) Modern (4,3)

Least descriptive: Prone to doping (1,9) Traditional (2,84) Masculine (3,13)

4 29/05/2019

Floorball as a sport

⚫ Concurs the description that has been used (Fast. Exciting. Spectacular.) ⚫ Further displays results in our work for equality and anti-doping ⚫ Can be used to target brands with similar associations

What kind of companies would be a good fit to sponsors floorball? (1-5)

5 29/05/2019

Business areas / best fit for floorball

⚫ Health tech (4,15) ⚫ Online shopping website (3,82) ⚫ Car brands (3,72) ⚫ Mobile electronics (3,68) ⚫ Travel agencies ( 3,52)

Do you think that any of the following activities will improve you in-game experiece? (multiple choice)

6 29/05/2019

Which of the following is most useful for you to follow floorball? (multiple choice)

Floorball consumption channels

⚫ Investment in internet and social media channels is justifiable ⚫ Proves the results of investments in SoMe ⚫ Digital activations a development area ⚫ Player of the Match voting (omni-channel) ⚫ On venue: decibel-meter, kiss-cam, social media wall, etc. (in-game experience)

7 29/05/2019

What of the following do you think you will do within one year? (multiple choice)

How many times do you travel abroad for leisure?

8 29/05/2019

What purchase do you often use the internet for?

What fitness activities do you enjoy practising? (multiple choice)

9 29/05/2019

What outdoor activities do you enjoy practising? (multiple choice)

Fitness / outdoor activities

⚫ Active target group

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

Men’s U19 WFC 2019 Digital Media report Sources: Meltwater, Sprout social, YouTube, OK System & Google analytics IFF website floorball.sport Period: 30.4. - 14.5.2019 Users: 32,227 Sessions: 70,940 Page views: 281,516 Pages/sessions: 3.97 Countries: 127

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 1

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

Top 10 countries:

Official U19 WFC website floorball2019.com (LOC website)

Period: 30.4.2019 – 14.5.2019 Users: 13,319 Sessions: 22,811 Page views: 36,225 Pages/sessions: 1.59 Countries: 50

Top 10 countries:

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 2

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

U19 WFC 2019 on YouTube

Combined statistics for both IFF Floorball Channels (all matches from the 2nd arena were streamed on channel 2 during the first day)

Statistics period: 8th May – 17th May 2019 Watch time (minutes): 5,634,124 Views: 434,146 New subscribers: 2,370 Likes: 2,970 (Channel 1 only) Comments: 18,364 (Channel 1 only) Shares: 2,548

U19 WFC 2019 Mobile App

Total downloads as of 21.5.2019: 60,170 (+ 1,910 new donwloads since the WFCQ 2019). A total of 1,690 persons took part in the A-division UNIHOC guess the results competition and a total of 947 persons tooka part in the B-division UNIHOC guess the results competition. iOS total downloads: 29,600

Top 5 countries:

1. SWE: 6,290 2. SUI: 5,230 3. CZE: 2,130 4. FIN: 2,110 5. GER: 1,260

Android total downloads: 30,570 (Android does not show stats by country)

Mobile App user numbers Period: 26.4. - 15.5.2019 Users: 7,393 Sessions: 101,309 Screen views: 851,788 Screens/session: 8.41 Countries: 71

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 3

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

Top 10 countries on using the Mobile App 26.4. - 15.5.2019:

U19 WFC 2019 Digital & Social media by Meltwater & Sprout

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 4

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 5

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 6

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 7

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 8

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

Group Stats from Sprout Social (30th April – 17th May 2019)

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 9

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 10

Recognised by the IOC Ordinary member of GAISF

Boolean query SOME (Meltwater tracking tool): (((”U19-poi*” OR "U-19" OR "U19*" OR ”alle 19-vuotiaiden poi*” OR "U19WFC*" OR ("Canada" NEAR/5 U19) OR "Halifax*" OR "Nova Scotia*" OR ”MU19” OR ”mu19wfc” OR “wfcu19” OR ("men*" NEAR/5 U19) OR ("herr*" NEAR/5 U19) OR “u19VM” OR "U19WM" OR "U19-VM*"OR "U19-WM*" OR “WCU19” OR “U19 herr*” OR “U19女子世界選手権”) NEAR/6 (floorball or unihockey or innebandy or sähly* or säbä* or unihokej* OR saliband* or "mistrovství světa ve florbal*" or florbol* or florbal* or florbalu* or saalihoki* or "플로어볼*" or "フロアボール*" or "Флорбол*")) OR #U19WFC2019 OR #U19WFC)

NOT (women OR female) Boolean query MEDIA (Meltwater tracking tool): (((”U19-poi*” OR ”U19-poj*” OR "U-19" OR "U19*" OR ”alle 19-vuotiaiden poi*” OR U19WFC* OR ”Halifax*” OR "Canada*" OR "Kanada*" OR ”MU19” OR ”mu19wfc” OR “wfcu19” OR ("men*" NEAR/5 U19*) OR ("herr*" NEAR/5 U19*) OR ("junio*" NEAR/5 U19) “u19VM” OR "U19WM" OR "U19-VM*" OR "U19-WM*" OR “WCU19” OR “U19herrr*” OR “campionato mondiale masculina u19” OR “U19女子世界選手権”) NEAR/6 (floorball or unihockey or innebandy or sähly* or säbä* or unihokej* OR saliband* or "mistrovství světa ve florbal*" or florbol* or florbal* or florbalu* or saalihoki* or "플로어볼*" or "フロアボール*" or "Флорбол*")) OR #U19WFC2019 OR #U19WFC)

Address: Phone: E-mail: Web-site Alakiventie 2, FI-00920 Helsinki +358 9 454 214 25 [email protected] www.floorball.sport Finland Page | 11

Major changes to Material Regulations

Certification Rules for IFF-marking of Floorball Equipment SPCR 011

Edition 2020

Interpretation of the Material Regulations. If the need to interpret Material Regulations between two editions occurs, can this be done 2 times / year (in May and December).

Valid from July 1, 2020

A major general revision of Material Regulations has been made for the 2020-year edition; the major changes are listed below:  The texts Abstract and Preface have been merged under the heading Preface, in addition to some texts that already exist elsewhere in Material Regulations.  There is a completely new section "Conditions for Certification of Floorball Equipment".  The biggest difference to the previous edition is probably that Section 1 is rewritten, there is a general part, IFF-marking part and each product type has its own heading. It is hoped that it will be easier to find what you are looking for, and it is easy to add or remove sub-items within the respective product type, if needed.  All the sketches / drawings are inserted in the main Material Regulations, and not as previously in separate pdf-file.  All appendix documents and sketches / drawings are divided in three groups A, B and C followed by a digit.  A new font has been introduced, which hopefully is more readable than the previous one.

News and additions in more detail:

1 Requirements, general Moved / added sub-sections.

1.1.4 Period of Validity for Certificate The period of validity for certificate is five years. The period of validity for family-certificates is two years. The holder of the certificate will be notified three months before the certificate is due to expire and asked which certificates (if any) he wishes to be extended. The period of validity can be extended after application from certificate holder followed by a limited evaluation. Presuming that the products are not modified, the certification rules are not significantly changed, and the surveillance has been performed without remarks, the extension can be done without further testing. If there have been any changes, a new testing can be necessary. The testing will then be limited to the parts that are changed.

1.1.9 Rules for current license holders with payment problems and debts to IFF/RISE over 5.000 CHF Any license holders, with outstanding debts for more than 5.000 CHF to IFF/RISE will be put on notice and will need to pre-pay the marking costs (see also section 1.3.1) and testing costs. As a second step IFF will decide a final pay date for all the existing debts. If the debts not are paid by then, IFF will not allow the licence holder to test new products, Test Stop. The Test Stop can only be lifted by decision of IFF.

1.2 IFF-Marking, general Moved / added sub-sections.

Marking is to contain the certification mark as shown below. Stick manufactures can print the certification mark as a part of the Brand name / Model name sticker / print, see section 1.3.1 The certification mark's type and placement for each product type is to be in line with the following: Stick sticker on the shaft of the stick, between the grip binding and shaft / blade attachment point. See section 1.3. Blade embossed mark on the blade's surface, see section 1.3.5. Ball embossed mark on the ball's surface, see section 1.4. Goals sticker around the goal crossbar, see section 1.5. Rink sticker on the back of each sideboard section, See section. 1.6. Facemask sticker on the inside or outside. (other requisite markings see appendix A9, only valid within the European Union). Grip embossed IFF-mark together with the brand name on the grip surface

approx. 100 – 400mm measured from the knob, see section 1.8.

Sizes: 37±2 mm x 15±2 mm, for sticks. 45 x 19 mm, facemasks. 90 x 38 mm, for goals and rinks. A minimum of 8 mm in height for grips.

(see appendix A5, Order form for certification marks).

1.2.2 Accounting reports Three time a year the manufacturers will have to send in accounting reports of the quantity of sold Floorball sticks, balls, spare grips and spare blades with certification marking during the following periods: - January – April, accounting reports must be sent in at latest May 21st. - May – August, accounting reports must be sent in at latest September 21st. - September – December, accounting reports must be sent in at latest January 21st following year. The accounting report form will be available for downloading from our homepage. The manufacturer’s person authorized to sign for the company as well as the companies Certified public accountant must sign the accounting report. The accounting report must be RISE available within three weeks after each period. See also section 4.6.5 concerning sanctions.

It is very essential that these reports for sticks, balls, spare grips and spare blades are correct and sent in time.

1.3 Stick, Shaft, Blade and Grip, Marking and Rules Marking is to contain the certification mark as shown in point 1.2. Stick manufactures can print the certification mark as a part of the Brand name / Model name sticker / print. The certification mark placement for each stick, blade and grip are to be in line with the following: Stick Sticker on the shaft of the stick, between the grip binding and shaft / blade attachment point. Blade Embossed mark on the blade's surface. Grip Embossed IFF-mark together with the brand name on the grip surface approx. 100 – 400mm measured from the knob.

Sizes: 37±2 mm x 15±2 mm, for sticks. A minimum of 8 mm in height for grips.

(see appendix A5, Order form for certification marks).

1.3.1 Marking of stick For new companies, in the first year after received its first certificate the IFF-mark must be purchased and applied to the shaft. In the first year, it is appropriate that a marking proposal include the IFF-mark are developed. The proposal must be presented and approved by the certification body (RISE). If the company would prefer to continue to purchase IFF-mark, it is also an opportunity.

From year two and with an approved marking proposal, it is possible to switch over to self-printing the certification mark as a part of the Brand name / Model name sticker / print.

If companies do not pay for the reported number of sold IFF-marked products in time and have debts exceeding CHF 5,000, the possibility of self-marking will be withdrawn. The company must return to purchase the IFF decal and advance payment will be used.

The brand name in question shall be included as a prefix- or a suffix in the name of the stick and the blade shall be marked accordingly with the brand name. The sticker / print must be performed in a resistant material, e.g. paper and similar materials are not allowed. The manufacturer is not allowed to change the dimension of the mark more than within below stated sizes, not change the design, colour, grey scale or black and white version of the mark. The background of the mark must not be white or transparent but have a good contrast to the IFF logotype, text and number, either it is performed in colour, grey scale or black and white. The number on the certification mark is to be the same as the stick’s certification number or the family-certification number followed by manufacturing year.

1.3.2 General Rules for the Floorball Stick Any combination of shafts, blades and grips between different brands are not legal. Further, it is not permitted to sell or use IFF-certified and approved shafts with non-approved or non-IFF-marked blades. Nor is it permitted to sell or use non-approved shafts together with IFF-marked and approved blades or non-approved blades that are still IFF-marked. All the above combinations are therefore not allowed to be sold on the marked or used in any official matches. It is of utmost importance that these rules are to be followed. All legal combinations of shafts/blades can be found in the database for certified equipment on IFF’s homepage. If a shaft is to be shorted; the shaft must be shorted from the top of the shaft. It’s not legal to shortening the shaft from the bottom (shaft/blade connection point) of the shaft.

1.4 Ball, Marking and Rules Moved / added sub-sections.

1.4.2 Boll colour The IFF reserves the exclusivity for its official match ball colours. Balls with the following colour codes are not allowed to be manufactured: To be specified!

1.5 Goal, Marking and Rules Moved / added sub-sections.

1.6 Rinks, Marking and Rules Moved / added sub-sections.

1.7 Mask, Marking and Rules Moved / added sub-sections.

Marking is to contain the certification mark as shown below (voluntary requirement). The certification mark's type and placement for the mask is to be in line with the following: Facemask: Sticker on the inside or outside. (other requisite markings see appendix A9, only valid within the European Union).

Sizes: 45 x 19 mm, facemasks. (see appendix A5, Order form for certification marks).

1.8 Grip, Marking and Rules (the section can be moved and incl. in section 1.3) The grip brand must be the same as on the shaft brand. Any combinations between different grip brands or unmarked grips and the shaft brand are not legal.

Make sure that all new sticks with grips as well as spare grips are carrying the new marking. Without the new marking the stick will not be allowed to be used in any official matches.

1.8.1 Embossed mark for grip The IFF-mark together with the brand name of the shaft must be shown as an embossed marking on the grip surface approx. 100 – 400mm measured from the knob. The font size must be of a minimum of 8 mm in height. The + manufacturer can design how to place the IFF + Brand Name on the grip. BRAND NAME

Companies must adopt the new marking requirement not Embossed Certification mark for grip later than 1st of July 2020.

The official IFF-mark for embossed or printed marking of 0 grip is available for download, on the Manufactures 10 + Information Web Site. BRAND NAME 0 0 4 The companies may for the coming season 2019-2020 mark the packaging of the grips with the text: “Product in accordance with Material Regulation 2020”

1.8.2 Chemical and allergy declaration The company must state that the grip does not contain hazardous chemicals and / or allergenic substances. A written declaration must be presented.

6 1.8.3 Exemption 0 Companies can apply for an exemption from the marking requirements for a period of maximum one year and ending June 30th2021. It gives the company the opportunity to sell out their already produced grips and grips in stock.

1.9 Floorball Accessories Moved sub-section.

2.1.3 Stick Dimensions The stick is to be designed with dimensions according to appendices B1 and B2. The shaft may be strapped above the grip line, but approval marks or other possible official marks must not be covered. It is permissible to divide the grip binding into two or more parts. The shaft must have a knob closing it. It is permissible to have other shaping (e.g. hexagonal, octahedral) on the upper 50 % of the shaft length. The upper 50 % of the shaft length must be covered by a grip binding if the shaft's curve radius is less than 6 mm.

The dimensions must conform to the standard. a) stick length max 1140 mm b) the shaft's curve radius min 6 mm c) the shaft's diameter max 35 mm +20 d) length to grip line marking 375 /-20 mm e) width of grip line design min 2 mm and max 40 mm * f) blade bottom edge radius max 270 mm

g) blade edge radius min 2 mm h) blade length max 270 mm i) blade thickness min 8 mm j) blade height min 72 mm and max 80 mm and passing through blade height measuring device. k) blade penetration depth max 20 mm l) blade concavity depth max 12 mm m) shaft straightness within 50 mm

* It is still legal to use a 10 mm wide grip line marking.

2.1.4.1 Shaft Rigidity Method A, shafts 850mm to 1040mm (sticks 950mm – 1140mm).

2.1.4.2 Shaft Rigidity Method B, shafts 650mm to 849mm (sticks 750mm – 949mm).

2.2 Ball The balls (10 of each type) are tested according to the SP-method 1506, section 5.3 (see appendix A1), and are assessed according to the following requirements. The ball can have only one colour outside and can have a second colour inside. IFF approves balls for IFF events and have reserves the exclusivity for its official match ball colours. (see paragraph 1.4.2).

2.3.7 Drop Net Length and Mounting / Positioning The drop net length is to be such that the bottom edge hangs between a min of 0 mm and a max of 50 mm from the playing surface and mounted in such a way that the entire goal cage width is covered (see appendix B7), apply to all goal sizes.

3 Supplier's In-House Inspection The supplier is to have an in-house inspection guaranteeing products marked with the certification mark meet the requirements in the certification rules. The certificate holder shall state this in a declaration.

The following testing and inspection procedures are to be included in the in-house inspection.

Product type Attribute (testing and Min allowed frequency requirements, see chapter 2) Stick design 1/100 manufactured weight dimensions shaft rigidity Ball weight 1/1000 manufactured dimensions 1/100 manufactured * surface fineness Goals dimensions 1/10 manufactured weight Rink dimensions 1/10 manufactured radii fit surface fineness Face mask mesh size 1/10 manufactured

* for small quantities, less than 2500 balls apply 1/100 manufactured.

4.6 Sanction System The International Floorball Federation IFF has implemented a sanction system to be applied to manufacturers in the event of failure of the surveillance inspection of material, sale of non-compliant marked equipment, not sending in accounting reports in time and not paid the invoices within the stipulated time as follows:

1. Surveillance inspection will be performed in accordance with the present system and regulations (SPCR 011 Material Regulations).

2. The manufacturer will perform in-house inspection and respond in accordance with the requirements of Paragraph 3. If surveillance inspection finds failures of materials, the company shall in accordance to the SPCR 011 Material Regulations provide an explanation of why the material has failed and shall provide a copy of its in-house test and inspection records for examination.

3. If the explanation does not provide a clear and suitable answer to the question, the IFF Central Board Material Function will decide upon the sanction to be applied to the company in accordance with the sanction system. The sanction system consists of four different levels (see section 4.6.1 - 4).

4. If an accounting report has not been received within stipulated time, a sanction fee will be applied. The sanction system consists of four different levels (see section 4.6.5).

5. If an invoice has not been paid within stipulated time, a sanction fee will be applied. The sanction system consists of four different levels (see section 4.6.6).

6. Certificates can with immediate effect temporarily be recalled. Temporarily recalled certificates will be published on IFF’s website (see section 4.6.6.4 and section 5.7).

7. Revenue from sanction penalties shall be used to develop Floorball in accordance with IFF Development Board decisions. Sanction penalties must be paid to the IFF account within 30 days of the IFF Central Board decision.

The IFF Central Board will inform its member Associations and the companies about any decision made by the Central Board in material questions. All information regarding these questions is strictly confidential until the decision is made.

IFF reserves the right to adjust and / or update the sanction system on yearly basis.

4.6.5 Sanctions for not sending accounting reports. From 15th of March 2004 stick manufactures can print the certification mark directly on the stick. To ensure that the correct fee for the certification mark is calculated, the manufacturer must three times a year send accounting reports to RISE. The report for Jan-Apr must be sent before 21st of May, the report for May-Aug before 21st of Sep and the report for Sep-Dec before 21st of Jan.

Ball, blade and manufactures shall have an embossed pattern of the certification mark on the balls surface. To ensure that the correct fee for the certification mark is calculated, the manufacturer must three times a year send accounting reports to RISE. The report for the period Jan – April must be sent

before 21st of May, for the period May – Aug before 21st of Sep and for the period Sep-Dec before 21st of Jan. It is very essential that these reports are correct and sent in time.

If an accounting report has not been received, a reminder will be sent out the first working day after the report date.

Appendix A5

Order form for certification marks

The undersigned hereby orders certification symbol labels as specified below

Company: ______

Contact person: ______

Order of certification marks.

Product Size Quantity Unit price Total price (exclusive freight costs) Ball 0:03 CHF

Stick 45 x 19 mm 0:25 CHF (self-print) 0:38 CHF (buying sticker)

Goal 90 x 38 mm 5:00 CHF (official match size) 2:50 CHF (smaller sizes)

Rink 90 x 38 mm 100 CHF

Mask 45 x 19 mm 0:75 CHF

Spare grip (0,05) CHF

Spare blade (0,10) CHF

Order of certification marks: ______the ______City and date

______Sign

______Clarification of signature

New drawing / sketch regarding drop net mounting / positioning

Description Drop n et l ength and m ounting / p ositioning requirements for floorball goal Appendix B7 Min 0 - Max 50 + 200 - 25 Drop net

Drop net

200 25

+ -

ATTACHEMENT POINTS ON THE OUTER NET BY USE OF e.g. CABLE TIES

Drawn by Inspected by Approved by Remarks Replaces Version L-Å H 1 RISE Research Institute of Sweden Drawn Chemistry and Materials Technology 190521 Section for Polymer Technology Floorball goal - Drawing no. Box 857 501 15 BORÅS, Sweden Drop net SPCR 011-B7e