DOCSLIB.ORG

Solon of Athens: the Man, the Myth, the Tyrant?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solon of Athens: the Man, the Myth, the Tyrant? University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2013 Solon of Athens: The Man, the Myth, the Tyrant? Kelcy Shannon Sagstetter University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Sagstetter, Kelcy Shannon, "Solon of Athens: The Man, the Myth, the Tyrant?" (2013). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 923. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/923 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/923 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Solon of Athens: The Man, the Myth, the Tyrant? Abstract I argue that, despite Solon's reputation as an enemy of tyranny, his approach to solving the political discord in Athens in 594 B.C. very closely resembles the way that archaic Greek tyrants succeeded at dealing with similar problems in other city-states. Because tyrants were often popular figures with widespread support, I suggest that Solon's anxiety to avoid the label of tyrant stemmed from the political unrest and bloodshed that arose from the attempted tyranny of Cylon in 632 BC, followed by the harsh and unsuccessful legislation of Drakon in 621. In the dissertation, I first establish that there are two traditions about Solon's motives and actions, indicated by many contradictions in our sources. In one version, Solon appears as a moderate politician who paved the way for the rise of democracy, in part because of his refusal to become a tyrant. In the other, Solon's actions were at times indistinguishable from those of contemporary tyrants, which later sources explain by referring to Solon's assertions in his own poetry to "prove" that these stories were false. I then analyze Solon's poetry, noting that Solon both linguistically distances himself from the concept of tyranny and emphasizes that he does, in fact, possess autocratic powers. The result is a kind of verbal dance, wherein he reminds people: "I am not, nor do1 I wish to be a tyrant; but I could be, and if I were...." Finally, I examine various tyrants who, like Solon, had reputations as legislators. I consider Solon's agricultural reforms, known as the seisachtheia, concentrating in particular on the abolition of debt-slavery, the cancellation of debt, and Solon's refusal to redistribute land. I find that debt cancellation in particular is one of the most common measures used by tyrants as a means of gathering political support from the demos. I also proffer the notion that doing away with debt-slavery may have done more damage than good, concluding that, despite his protests to the contrary, Solon was a tyrant in all but name. Degree Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Graduate Group Ancient History First Advisor Jeremy McInerney Keywords Agrarian Reform, Archaic Greece, Cylon, Solon, tyranny, tyrants Subject Categories Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity | Classics This dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/923 SOLON OF ATHENS: THE MAN, THE MYTH, THE TYRANT? Kelcy Sagstetter A DISSERTATION in Ancient History Presented to the Faculties of the University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2013 Supervisor of Dissertation Signature ______________________________ Jeremy McInerney Davidson Kennedy Professor of Classical Studies Graduate Group Chairperson Signature ______________________________ Campbell Gray, Associate Professor of Classical Studies Dissertation Committee Jeremy McInerney, Davidson Kennedy Professor of Classical Studies Sheila Murnaghan, Alfred Reginald Allen Memorial Professor of Greek C. Brian Rose, James B. Pritchard Professor of Archaeology ii To my mother, who always believed in me, and kept me well-supplied with books. iii Acknowledgments Many people contributed to the completion of this dissertation. I would first like to thank my mother, whose unwavering support during these (many) years of graduate school have helped more than she can ever know. I'd also like to thank my aunt, Karen Sagstetter, for inspiring me to pursue my dreams no matter how impractical others may have thought them. The independent coffee shops of Philadelphia deserve a mention for supplying the copious amounts of caffeine that were necessary to fuel my academic creativity, especially toward the end of this process. I would also like to thank my friends Emerson Avery and Marian Makins, with whom I met to work nearly every day for the past year, without whose help and encouragement this process would have been much harder. And finally I'd like to thank my committee, Bridget Murnaghan, Brian Rose, and particularly Jeremy McInerney, whose comments and advice have been sometimes daunting, but always constructive, and which has immensely improved the final product. iv ABSTRACT SOLON OF ATHENS: THE MAN, THE MYTH, THE TYRANT? Kelcy Sagstetter Jeremy McInerney 1I argue that, despite Solon's reputation as an enemy of tyranny, his approach to solving the political discord in Athens in 594 B.C. very closely resembles the way that archaic Greek tyrants succeeded at dealing with similar problems in other city-states. Because tyrants were often popular figures with widespread support, I suggest that Solon's anxiety to avoid the label of tyrant stemmed from the political unrest and bloodshed that arose from the attempted tyranny of Cylon in 632 BC, followed by the harsh and unsuccessful legislation of Drakon in 621. In the dissertation, I first establish that there are two traditions about Solon's motives and actions, indicated by many contradictions in our sources. In one version, Solon appears as a moderate politician who paved the way for the rise of democracy, in part because of his refusal to become a tyrant. In the other, Solon's actions were at times indistinguishable from those of contemporary tyrants, which later sources explain by referring to Solon's assertions in his own poetry to "prove" that these stories were false. I then analyze Solon’s poetry, noting that Solon both linguistically distances himself from the concept of tyranny and emphasizes that he does, in fact, possess autocratic powers. The result is a kind of verbal dance, wherein he reminds people: "I am not, nor do1 I wish to be a tyrant; but I could be, and if I were...." Finally, I examine various tyrants who, like Solon, had reputations as legislators. I consider Solon's agricultural reforms, known as the seisachtheia, concentrating in v particular on the abolition of debt-slavery, the cancellation of debt, and Solon's refusal to redistribute land. I find that debt cancellation in particular is one of the most common measures used by tyrants as a means of gathering political support from the demos. I also proffer the notion that doing away with debt-slavery may have done more damage than good, concluding that, despite his protests to the contrary, Solon was a tyrant in all but name. vi Table of Contents 1. Introduction………………………………………………………………1 I. Outline....................................................................................................3 II.Sixth-Century Attica in Context: The Political Background..................7 III. Tyrants: Bad or Just Drawn that Way?................................................. 12 IV. Solon's Life.......................................................................................... 20 V. Solon's Poetry..........................................................................................25 VI.Solon's Legal Code................................................................................28 VII. Aristotle, Plutarch, and Solon on the Agrarian Crisis.........................37 VIII. Historical Interpretations of the Agrarian Crisis...............................40 2. Solon's Contradictory Legacy……………………………………………47 I. Solon as Philosopher and Sage...............................................................48 II.Solon as Nomothetes..............................................................................60 III. Solon as Misotyrannos....................................................................... 66 IV. Conclusion........................................................................................... 75 3. Solon the protodemocrat…………………………………………………76 I. Solon as an Authority Figure in Fourth-Century Oratory 90 a. Solon, Demosthenes, and Aeschines …………………………………91 b. Solon and Isocrates …………………………………………………94 c. Solon and Plato ………………………………………………………97 II.Conclusion..............................................................................................101 4. Politics and Poetry: Solon and the "Language of Tyranny"...……………103 I. κόρος: Too Much of a Good Thing?.......................................................107 II.βίη and δίκη: An Uneasy Alliance?........................................................113 III. Honor to the People: δήµωι ἔδωκα τόσον γέρας.................................. 119 IV. Tyranny: κλέος or αἰδώς?..................................................................... 126 V. Wolf Imagery in Solon's Poetry..............................................................133 VI.Conclusion............................................................................................143 5. Benevolent Tyranny? ……………………………………………………145 I. Tyrants as Legislators.............................................................................146
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Theopompos' Treatment of Cimon Connor, W Robert Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1963; 4, 2; Proquest Pg
    Theopompos' Treatment of Cimon Connor, W Robert Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Spring 1963; 4, 2; ProQuest pg. 107 Theopompos' Treatment of Cimon w. Robert Connor MOST A CENTURY AGO F. Ruhll first called attention to a E curious and difficult fragment of Theopompos2 in the Contra Iulianum of St. Cyril of Alexandria. The fragment, now printed as number 90 in Jacoby's collection, is an attack on the integrity of Cimon, the fifth-century Athenian general. Since Ruhl's discovery the fragment has received little serious discussion: it was omitted in the collections of Theopompos made by Schranz and by Grenfell and Hunt,3 only briefly discussed by Jacoby,4 applied to other Athen­ ians by Meyer and Wade-Gery,5 and dismissed by Ruhl himself as part of a "vollstandiges Lugensystem"6 developed by the Christian authors to denigrate paganism. More disconcerting is the failure of two important studies of Theopompos to consider the fragment. Both K. von Fritz and A. Momigliano accept the view that Theopompos gave his "permanent approval" to Cimon, "the old-time gentleman, brilliant in war as well as in society, a perfect aristocrat ... who was finally defeated ... 1 F. RUhl, Die Quellen Plutarchs im Leben des Kimcn (Marburg dissertation 1867). 2 FGrHist 115 F 90. It has been suggested to me that the large number of iambic feet in the fragment (infra page 108) may indicate that the fragment belongs to Theopompos the comic poet, not Theopompos the historian. The fragment, however, accords well with what is known of the digression on the demagogues in the Philippica, and has no obvious parallel among the fragments of the comedian.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander the Great and Hephaestion
    2019-3337-AJHIS-HIS 1 Alexander the Great and Hephaestion: 2 Censorship and Bisexual Erasure in Post-Macedonian 3 Society 4 5 6 Same-sex relations were common in ancient Greece and having both male and female 7 physical relationships was a cultural norm. However, Alexander the Great is almost 8 always portrayed in modern depictions as heterosexual, and the disappearance of his 9 life-partner Hephaestion is all but complete in ancient literature. Five full primary 10 source biographies of Alexander have survived from antiquity, making it possible to 11 observe the way scholars, popular writers and filmmakers from the Victorian era 12 forward have interpreted this evidence. This research borrows an approach from 13 gender studies, using the phenomenon of bisexual erasure to contribute a new 14 understanding for missing information regarding the relationship between Alexander 15 and his life-partner Hephaestion. In Greek and Macedonian society, pederasty was the 16 norm, and boys and men did not have relations with others of the same age because 17 there was almost always a financial and power difference. Hephaestion was taller and 18 more handsome than Alexander, so it might have appeared that he held the power in 19 their relationship. The hypothesis put forward here suggests that writers have erased 20 the sexual partnership between Alexander and Hephaestion because their relationship 21 did not fit the norm of acceptable pederasty as practiced in Greek and Macedonian 22 culture or was no longer socially acceptable in the Roman contexts of the ancient 23 historians. Ancient biographers may have conducted censorship to conceal any 24 implication of femininity or submissiveness in this relationship.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Freed Athens? J
    Ancient Greek Democracy: Readings and Sources Edited by Eric W. Robinson Copyright © 2004 by Blackwell Publishing Ltd The Beginnings of the Athenian Democracv: Who Freed Athens? J Introduction Though the very earliest democracies lildy took shape elsewhere in Greece, Athens embraced it relatively early and would ultimately become the most famous and powerful democracy the ancient world ever hew. Democracy is usually thought to have taken hold among the Athenians with the constitutional reforms of Cleisthenes, ca. 508/7 BC. The tyrant Peisistratus and later his sons had ruled Athens for decades before they were overthrown; Cleisthenes, rallying the people to his cause, made sweeping changes. These included the creation of a representative council (bode)chosen from among the citizens, new public organizations that more closely tied citizens throughout Attica to the Athenian state, and the populist ostracism law that enabled citizens to exile danger- ous or undesirable politicians by vote. Beginning with these measures, and for the next two centuries or so with only the briefest of interruptions, democracy held sway at Athens. Such is the most common interpretation. But there is, in fact, much room for disagree- ment about when and how democracy came to Athens. Ancient authors sometimes refer to Solon, a lawgiver and mediator of the early sixth century, as the founder of the Athenian constitution. It was also a popular belief among the Athenians that two famous “tyrant-slayers,” Harmodius and Aristogeiton, inaugurated Athenian freedom by assas- sinating one of the sons of Peisistratus a few years before Cleisthenes’ reforms - though ancient writers take pains to point out that only the military intervention of Sparta truly ended the tyranny.
    [Show full text]
  • Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept of Kingship
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Jacob Douglas Feeley University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons, and the Jewish Studies Commons Recommended Citation Feeley, Jacob Douglas, "Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2276. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2276 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Josephus As Political Philosopher: His Concept Of Kingship Abstract Scholars who have discussed Josephus’ political philosophy have largely focused on his concepts of aristokratia or theokratia. In general, they have ignored his concept of kingship. Those that have commented on it tend to dismiss Josephus as anti-monarchical and ascribe this to the biblical anti- monarchical tradition. To date, Josephus’ concept of kingship has not been treated as a significant component of his political philosophy. Through a close reading of Josephus’ longest text, the Jewish Antiquities, a historical work that provides extensive accounts of kings and kingship, I show that Josephus had a fully developed theory of monarchical government that drew on biblical and Greco- Roman models of kingship. Josephus held that ideal kingship was the responsible use of the personal power of one individual to advance the interests of the governed and maintain his and his subjects’ loyalty to Yahweh. The king relied primarily on a standard array of classical virtues to preserve social order in the kingdom, protect it from external threats, maintain his subjects’ quality of life, and provide them with a model for proper moral conduct.
    [Show full text]
  • The Satrap of Western Anatolia and the Greeks
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2017 The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Eyal Meyer University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Ancient History, Greek and Roman through Late Antiquity Commons Recommended Citation Meyer, Eyal, "The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks" (2017). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 2473. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/2473 For more information, please contact [email protected]. The aS trap Of Western Anatolia And The Greeks Abstract This dissertation explores the extent to which Persian policies in the western satrapies originated from the provincial capitals in the Anatolian periphery rather than from the royal centers in the Persian heartland in the fifth ec ntury BC. I begin by establishing that the Persian administrative apparatus was a product of a grand reform initiated by Darius I, which was aimed at producing a more uniform and centralized administrative infrastructure. In the following chapter I show that the provincial administration was embedded with chancellors, scribes, secretaries and military personnel of royal status and that the satrapies were periodically inspected by the Persian King or his loyal agents, which allowed to central authorities to monitory the provinces. In chapter three I delineate the extent of satrapal authority, responsibility and resources, and conclude that the satraps were supplied with considerable resources which enabled to fulfill the duties of their office. After the power dynamic between the Great Persian King and his provincial governors and the nature of the office of satrap has been analyzed, I begin a diachronic scrutiny of Greco-Persian interactions in the fifth century BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Jean Bodin, 1566 Method for the Easy Comprehension of History
    www.anacyclosis.org THE INSTITUTE FOR ANACYCLOSIS EXCERPT FROM METHOD FOR THE EASY COMPREHENSION OF HISTORY BY JEAN BODIN 1566 A.D. Note: This text begins by recounting the Polybian typology of constitutional forms. Bodin then asserts, consistent with the model of Anacyclosis, that political society on the national scale begins in monarchy and degenerates into tyranny. Bodin then challenges the remainder of the validity of the Anacyclosis model. This excerpt is presented to illustrate this very important point: in discounting the Polybian Anacyclosis, Bodin (likely in reliance on Aristotle) made the same mistake that F. W. Walbank (the greatest historian of Polybius) made in the 20th century A.D., who also relied on Aristotle to challenge the validity of Anacyclosis as a model of political evolution; Bodin did not raise the unit of analysis from the level of a city-state or nation-state to that of a world-state as Polybius had done when he first described Anacyclosis in view of the emerging Roman Empire in the second half of the 2nd century B.C. Polybius lived to see the first truly economically, legally, linguistically, and culturally integrated political entity of global scale in recorded history – the first “closed political system” in the Machiavellian sense. Aristotle’s and Plato’s units of analyses, by contrast, were mere city-states or confederations existing within a sea of rivals and threats; but Aristotle and Plato lived roughly two centuries before Polybius. From the standpoint of evolutionary modeling, Polybius has an authority that Aristotle and Plato cannot match because he had a superior historical vantage point vis-à-vis Rome, which by the time of Polybius had nearly completed the conquest and integration of the Mediterranean basin and eradicated all serious rivals.
    [Show full text]
  • Genesis 2–3 and Alcibiades's Speech in Plato's Symposium: a Cultural
    Page 1 of 6 Original Research Genesis 2–3 and Alcibiades’s speech in Plato’s Symposium: A cultural critical reading Author: The purpose of this article is to discuss some basic problems and methodological steps 1,2 Evangelia G. Dafni concerning the encounter between Hebrews and Greeks in the Classical period and its impact Affiliations: on the Hellenistic era. The relationship between the Old Testament and Ancient Greek 1Department of Ecclesiastical literature will be examined on the basis of Genesis 2–3 and Alcibiades’s speech in Plato’s and Social Theology, Faculty Symposium (212c–223d). The following considerations and models of interpretation can arise of Theology, Aristotle from the analysis of Alcibiades’s speech compared to M- and LXX-Genesis 2–3: (1) Ancient University of Thessaloniki, Greece Greek writers were familiar with Old Testament oral or written traditions through improvised translations. They prepared the way for the LXX and, in their compositions, were in dispute 2Department of Old with them although they do not make specific references to the Hebrews and their literature; Testament Studies, Faculty (2) Hebrew authors knew the works of Ancient Greek authors and used Greek philosophical of Theology, University of Pretoria, South Africa terminology which they creatively adapted to Semitic models; (3) Both models are possible. One should not rush to any decisions but examine each case individually, in the original Note: language. Professor Evangelia Dafni is a Research Associate of Professor Dirk Human in the Department of Old Testament Introduction Studies at the Faculty of Genesis 2–3 is of central importance for the anthropology of the Old Testament: It describes in Theology, University of Pretoria.
    [Show full text]
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards
    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
    [Show full text]
  • The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:2 (1986:Summer) P.173
    STANLEY, PHILLIP V., The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:2 (1986:Summer) p.173 The Family Connection of Alcibiades and Axiochus Phillip V. Stanley LTHOUGH THE ANCESTRY of the Athenian general Alcibiades A III remains obscure for the sixth century, his genealogy is as­ sumed to be secure for the fifth. The descent of the family from Alcibiades I to Alcibiades IV has been reconstructed by Vander­ pool in the following way:l Alcibiades J2 I Cleinias I I Alcibiades II I I Axiochus Cleinias II I I I I Cleinias III Alcibiades III Cleinias IV I Alcibiades IV I E. Vanderpool, "The Ostracism of the Elder Alcibiades," Hesperia 21 (I952) 1-8, esp. 6. Cr. M. B. Wallace, "Early Greek Proxenoi," Phoenix 24 (I 970) 196f; 1. K. DAVIES, Athenian Propertied Families (Oxford 1971 [hereafter APF)) 10-12. According to Isoc. 16.25f (delivered by Alcibiades IV, son of the general), Alcibiades I, the ally of Cleisthenes when he expelled Hippias from Athens, was the great-grandfather (1TpO- 1Ta1T1To~) of Alcibiades III. The general difficulty stems from the apparent need to reduce the number of generations separating Alcibiades I from Alcibiades III, believed to be five: if the number is not reduced, Alcibiades I would actually be the great-great­ grandfather of the general. 2 Roman numerals are those assigned in PA and APF. These numerals will continue to be used even when homonyms are added to the family's genealogy. In order to avoid the confusion that might result if a major overhaul of the numerical system for this family were attempted, and to preserve the numerical descent established for the branch of the family to which Alcibiades III belongs, the newly identified individual will be assigned the next available Roman numeral, even though he may be earlier than an individual with the same name whose number is lower.
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Datastream
    City of Praise: The Politics of Encomium in Classical Athens By Mitchell H. Parks B.A., Grinnell College, 2008 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics at Brown University PROVIDENCE, RHODE ISLAND MAY 2014 © Copyright 2014 by Mitchell H. Parks This dissertation by Mitchell H. Parks is accepted in its present form by the Department of Classics as satisfying the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date Adele Scafuro, Adviser Recommended to the Graduate Council Date Johanna Hanink, Reader Date Joseph D. Reed, Reader Approved by the Graduate Council Date Peter M. Weber, Dean of the Graduate School iii Curriculum Vitae Mitchell H. Parks was born on February 16, 1987, in Kearney, NE, and spent his childhood and adolescence in Selma, CA, Glenside, PA, and Kearney, MO (sic). In 2004 he began studying at Grinnell College in Grinnell, IA, and in 2007 he spent a semester in Greece through the College Year in Athens program. He received his B.A. in Classics with honors in 2008, at which time he was also inducted into Phi Beta Kappa and was awarded the Grinnell Classics Department’s Seneca Prize. During his graduate work at Brown University in Providence, RI, he delivered papers at the annual meetings of the Classical Association of the Middle West and South (2012) and the American Philological Association (2014), and in the summer of 2011 he taught ancient Greek for the Hellenic Education & Research Center program in Thouria, Greece, in addition to attending the British School at Athens epigraphy course.
    [Show full text]
  • List of California State Fire Marshal Approved Carbon Monoxide Alarms
    List of California State Fire Marshal Approved Carbon Monoxide Alarms Listing Listing Information Number BRK BRANDS, INC. 5276- Company: BRK BRANDS, INC. 0087:0152 Address: 3901 W. Liberty Street Road, Aurora, IL 60504-8122 Contact: Mark Dippner Phone: (630) 851-7330 Ext: 3422 Fax: (630) 851-9309 Date Issued: 07/01/2014 Listing Expires: 06/30/2015 Description: Models CO400, CO410, CO600, CO606 and CO615 Carbon monoxide alarms. Category: CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS See Listing Service 5276- Company: BRK BRANDS, INC. 0087:0153 Address: 3901 W. Liberty Street Road, Aurora, IL 60504-8122 Contact: Mark Dippner Phone: (630) 851-7330 Ext: 3422 Fax: (630) 851-9309 Date Issued: 07/01/2014 Listing Expires: 06/30/2015 Description: Models "First Alert" CO500 and CO511 single/multiple station, battery operated. Carbon Monoxide alarms. Category: CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS See Listing Service 5276- Company: BRK BRANDS, INC. 0087:0154 Address: 3901 W. Liberty Street Road, Aurora, IL 60504-8122 Contact: Mark Dippner Phone: (630) 851-7330 Ext: 3422 Fax: (630) 851-9309 Date Issued: 07/01/2014 Listing Expires: 06/30/2015 Description: Models "First Alert" GCO1 single station, AC powered with battery back-up Carbon Monoxide alarm. Category: CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS See Listing Service 5276- Company: BRK BRANDS, INC. 0087:0155 Address: 3901 W. Liberty Street Road, Aurora, IL 60504-8122 Contact: Mark Dippner Phone: (630) 851-7330 Ext: 3422 Fax: (630) 851-9309 Date Issued: 07/01/2014 Listing Expires: 06/30/2015 Description: Models "First Alert" CO604 and CO614 Carbon Monoxide alarms. Category: CARBON MONOXIDE ALARMS See Listing Service Revised on 1/13/15 5276- Company: BRK BRANDS, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Athenian Democracy.Pdf
    Rethinking Athenian Democracy A dissertation presented by Daniela Louise Cammack to The Department of Government in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of Political Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts January 2013 © 2013 Daniela Cammack All rights reserved. Professor Richard Tuck Daniela Cammack Abstract Conventional accounts of classical Athenian democracy represent the assembly as the primary democratic institution in the Athenian political system. This looks reasonable in the light of modern democracy, which has typically developed through the democratization of legislative assemblies. Yet it conflicts with the evidence at our disposal. Our ancient sources suggest that the most significant and distinctively democratic institution in Athens was the courts, where decisions were made by large panels of randomly selected ordinary citizens with no possibility of appeal. This dissertation reinterprets Athenian democracy as “dikastic democracy” (from the Greek dikastēs, “judge”), defined as a mode of government in which ordinary citizens rule principally through their control of the administration of justice. It begins by casting doubt on two major planks in the modern interpretation of Athenian democracy: first, that it rested on a conception of the “wisdom of the multitude” akin to that advanced by epistemic democrats today, and second that it was “deliberative,” meaning that mass discussion of political matters played a defining role. The first plank rests largely on an argument made by Aristotle in support of mass political participation, which I show has been comprehensively misunderstood. The second rests on the interpretation of the verb “bouleuomai” as indicating speech, but I suggest that it meant internal reflection in both the courts and the assembly.
    [Show full text]