DOCSLIB.ORG

Survey of Critical Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Gunnison County

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Survey of Critical Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Gunnison County Survey of Critical Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Gunnison County Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University 8002 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 1 Survey of Critical Wetlands and Riparian Areas in Gunnison County Prepared for: Colorado Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street Room 718 Denver, Colorado 80203 Prepared by: Joe Rocchio, Georgia Doyle, and Renée Rondeau November 17, 2004 Colorado Natural Heritage Program Colorado State University College of Natural Resources 8002 Campus Delivery Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-8002 Copyright © 2003 by Colorado Natural Heritage Program Cover photograph: Pond dominated by beaked sedge (Carex utriculata) and narrowleaf bur-reed (Sparganium emersum), with East Beckwith Mountain in the background. Photo taken by Joe Rocchio. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Financial support for this study was provided by the Colorado Department of Natural Resources (CDNR) through a grant from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8. We greatly appreciate the support and assistance of Alex Chappell of the Colorado Division of Wildlife, Kimberly Seymour of the Colorado Department of Natural Resources, and Sarah Fowler and Ed Sterns of the EPA, Region 8. This project would not have been possible without the help of many dedicated individuals. We appreciate the support of the members of the Gunnison Wetland Focus Area Committee for providing their local knowledge of important wetlands in Gunnison County. Art and Sandy Hayes, both with the Bureau of Land Management, provided moral support, lots of input on sites, and plenty of research materials, especially GIS data. Thanks so much, and we’ll never lose site of what could be “If sage grouse had antlers.” Barry Johnston, of the U.S. Forest Service in Gunnison, provided invaluable incite, recommendations, and data (via the “Barry Bible,” as we like to call his incredible publication: “Ecological types of the Upper Gunnison Basin: Vegetation-soil-landform-geology-climate-water land classes for natural resource management”.) Gay Austin, also with the U.S. Forest Service in Gunnison, assisted us with valuable suggestions of interesting wetland sites and attended any questions we had throughout the summer. Ian Billick, Director of the Rocky Mountain Biological Laboratory (RMBL), kindly answered questions, provided suggestions, and provided access to the resources RMBL had to offer. Butch Clark provided many helpful suggestions and contacts and a tour of his property along Tomichi Creek, a wonderful oasis of willows in an otherwise ‘sea of pastures’. We are also very thankful to Lynn Cudlip, whose input and enthusiasm for this project was invaluable. Kathy Darrow also provided much support via site suggestions and a wonderfully written article, which appeared in the Gunnison Times and Crested Butte Weekly, touting this project and its benefit to Gunnison County. Thanks so much, Kathy, for educating the citizens of Gunnison County about the Colorado Division of Wildlife’s Wetland Program’s effort to work toward voluntary wetland protection and restoration and the role the Colorado Natural Heritage has in that process. Paula Lehr kindly shared her home and knowledge of the locations of rare high elevation wetland species. Paula’s input and hospitality was much appreciated! And speaking of hospitality, we’d like to especially acknowledge and thank Matt Malick of the National Park Service and the Curecanti National Recreation Area for providing us with a place to rest, work, and sleep for the latter half of the summer. Your hospitality made our time in Gunnison County very enjoyable. John Hess, Planner with the City of Crested Butte, provided us with a tour of the Crested Butte Land Trust wetland properties and much input and data on the wetland resources found there. Special thanks to Jessica Young (Western State College) and Paul Jones (Colorado Division of Wildlife) who provided invaluable input on the Gunnison Sage Grouse, David Gann (The Nature Conservancy) provided suggestion on sites, and Dan Bauch (Colorado Division of Wildlife) provided us with information on fish in Gunnison County. We are also grateful to the landowners who gave us permission to survey their property. We enjoyed meeting them, and in some cases hiking with them on their property. Our staff in Fort Collins, including Kathy Carsey, Jodie Bell, Jill Handwerk, Jeremy Siemers, Amy Lavender, Alison Loar, Barbara Brayfield, and Katie Newhaus all worked with us patiently. Brad Lambert provided much assistance with boreal toad data. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................................................................................................... i LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ v LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................................... 1 CONSERVATION STRATEGIES ............................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 8 WETLAND DEFINITIONS, REGULATIONS, AND FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENTS.......................................................................................................................... 11 WETLAND DEFINITIONS...........................................................................................................................11 WETLAND REGULATION IN COLORADO ..................................................................................................11 WETLAND FUNCTIONS AND VALUES.......................................................................................................12 WETLAND FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT ....................................................................................................13 Overall Functional Integrity............................................................................................................................13 Flood Attenuation and Storage .......................................................................................................................14 Sediment/Shoreline Stabilization ...................................................................................................................14 Groundwater Discharge/Recharge .................................................................................................................14 Dynamic Surface Water Storage ....................................................................................................................14 Elemental Cycling ............................................................................................................................................15 Removal of Imported Nutrients, Toxicants, and Sediments.......................................................................15 Habitat Diversity...............................................................................................................................................15 General Wildlife and Fish Habitat .................................................................................................................15 Production Export/Food Chain Support ........................................................................................................15 Uniqueness.........................................................................................................................................................16 HYDROGEOMORPHIC (HGM) APPROACH TO WETLAND FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT .............................16 PROJECT BACKGROUND...................................................................................................... 19 LOCATION AND PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDY AREA.............................................................19 HYDROLOGY ............................................................................................................................................22 VEGETATION............................................................................................................................................24 OBSERVATIONS ON MAJOR THREATS TO WETLAND BIODIVERSITY .......................................................25 Hydrological Modifications ............................................................................................................................27 Development .....................................................................................................................................................28 Mining................................................................................................................................................................28 Livestock Grazing.............................................................................................................................................28 Logging ..............................................................................................................................................................28 Recreation..........................................................................................................................................................29 Roads..................................................................................................................................................................29
Load more

Recommended publications
  • OPEN SPACE and DEVELOPMENT in the UPPER EAST RIVER VALLEY Open Space Subdivided Land & Single Family Residences Parcel Boundaries C.C
    K E TO SCHOFIELD E R C R E MAROON BELLS P P SNOWMASS WILDERNESS O C GOTHIC MOUNTAIN GOTHIC TOWNSITE TEOCALLI MOUNTAIN (RMBL) Gothic Mountain Subdivision Washington Gulch (CBLT) Glee Biery C.E. Maxfield Meadows C.E. The Bench (CBLT) (CBLT) C.E. (CBLT) Rhea Easement C O U N T SNODGRASS MOUNTAIN Y 3 1 7 W E A A S S S L H T A IN T G R E T IV O E R N R I V G E U L R C The Reserve (C.E.) H R (COL) D RAGGEDS WILDERNESS Smith Hill #1 (CBLT) Divine C.E. (CBLT) Meridian Lake Park D R C I M H E T R MERIDIAN LAKE PARK O I G Gunsight D RESERVOIR I Bridge A Prospect C.A. N K Parcel CREE FUL (CBLT) L -JOY A H-BE K O E TOWN OF \( L MT. CRESTED BUTTE BLM O W N A NICHOLSON LAKE G S H L I A N K BLM G Smith Hill RanEches T ) O N Alpine Meadows C.A. G Glacier Lily U Donation L (CBLT) C Nevada C.E. H Lower Loop (CBLT) Parcels R Rolling River C.E. (CBLT) (CBLT) D Wildbird C.O. Investments Glacier Lily Estates Estates (CBLT) BLM Rice Parcel (CBLT) Peanut Mine C.E. (TCB) MT EMMONS Utley Parcel S LA (CBLT) TE Peanut Lake R Saddle Ridge C.A. Parcel (CBLT) IV ER PEANUT LAKE Gallin Parcel (CBLT) R CRESTED BUTTE D Robinson Parcel Three (CBLT) Trappers Crossing S Valleys L Kapushion Family P Confluence at C.B.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Locatable Mineral Reports for Colorado, South Dakota, and Wyoming provided to the U.S. Forest Service in Fiscal Years 1996 and 1997 by Anna B. Wilson Open File Report OF 97-535 1997 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. CONTENTS page INTRODUCTION ................................................................... 1 COLORADO ...................................................................... 2 Arapaho National Forest (administered by White River National Forest) Slate Creek .................................................................. 3 Arapaho and Roosevelt National Forests Winter Park Properties (Raintree) ............................................... 15 Gunnison and White River National Forests Mountain Coal Company ...................................................... 17 Pike National Forest Land Use Resource Center .................................................... 28 Pike and San Isabel National Forests Shepard and Associates ....................................................... 36 Roosevelt National Forest Larry and Vi Carpenter ....................................................... 52 Routt National Forest Smith Rancho ............................................................... 55 San Juan National
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Mine Geophy
    Work Plan to Locate Level 2 Adit Standard Mine Superfund Site Crested Butte, Colorado June 29, 2017 Contents 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Site Location and Description ............................................................................................. 1 1.3 2016 Drilling Activities ......................................................................................................... 2 2 SCOPE OF GEOPHYSICAL SURVEYS ...................................................................................... 7 2.1 Work Tasks ......................................................................................................................... 7 2.1.1 Survey Planning ..................................................................................................... 7 2.1.2 Mobilization ............................................................................................................. 8 2.1.3 In-Field Testing ....................................................................................................... 8 2.1.4 Data Collection/Recording ...................................................................................... 8 2.1.5 Demobilization ........................................................................................................ 9
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Background Study, Curecanti Recreation Area, Colorado
    •••••a••• ••••a••••aa•a COLORADO Historical Background Study By BENJAMIN LEVY DIVISION OF HISTORY Office of Areheology and Historic Preservation October 15, 1968 National Park Service B&WScans U.S. Department of the Interior ..S·fb·~~ FOREIDRD The object of th.is study is to provide the historical data necessary :fOJ: the proper development of a Master Plan for Curecanti Rec:ceation Area, Colorado. This study, authorized by Resource Study Proposal (RSP) CURE-H-1, seeks to identi:fy historical resources and historic sites lo­ cated within or closely associated with the recreation area. Such an undertaking will enable master planning teams to consider the use o:f historical data in interpre­ tive and development programs and provide £or the protection 0£ historic sites and structures. Ideally, thE! background study ought to precede the master plan team's field investigation. The urgency 0£ the Curecanti plan r1equired this investigation to be undertaken immediately at the beginning of the current :fiscal year and compelled it to be done while the team was in the field. Hopefully, this report will have found its way into the team's hands prior to their completion report. This report does not pretend to be a detailed or de­ £ini tive study of the history 0£ the Curecanti area. The urgency of the c:all of this document and the limited time assigned for its preparation permit little more than the examination of secondary sources, although little i published mateI'ial exists on the history ox that stretch of the Gunnison River from Montrose to Gunnison city.
    [Show full text]
  • December 2012 Number 1
    Calochortiana December 2012 Number 1 December 2012 Number 1 CONTENTS Proceedings of the Fifth South- western Rare and Endangered Plant Conference Calochortiana, a new publication of the Utah Native Plant Society . 3 The Fifth Southwestern Rare and En- dangered Plant Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, March 2009 . 3 Abstracts of presentations and posters not submitted for the proceedings . 4 Southwestern cienegas: Rare habitats for endangered wetland plants. Robert Sivinski . 17 A new look at ranking plant rarity for conservation purposes, with an em- phasis on the flora of the American Southwest. John R. Spence . 25 The contribution of Cedar Breaks Na- tional Monument to the conservation of vascular plant diversity in Utah. Walter Fertig and Douglas N. Rey- nolds . 35 Studying the seed bank dynamics of rare plants. Susan Meyer . 46 East meets west: Rare desert Alliums in Arizona. John L. Anderson . 56 Calochortus nuttallii (Sego lily), Spatial patterns of endemic plant spe- state flower of Utah. By Kaye cies of the Colorado Plateau. Crystal Thorne. Krause . 63 Continued on page 2 Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights Reserved. Utah Native Plant Society Utah Native Plant Society, PO Box 520041, Salt Lake Copyright 2012 Utah Native Plant Society. All Rights City, Utah, 84152-0041. www.unps.org Reserved. Calochortiana is a publication of the Utah Native Plant Society, a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit organi- Editor: Walter Fertig ([email protected]), zation dedicated to conserving and promoting steward- Editorial Committee: Walter Fertig, Mindy Wheeler, ship of our native plants. Leila Shultz, and Susan Meyer CONTENTS, continued Biogeography of rare plants of the Ash Meadows National Wildlife Refuge, Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunnison River
    final environmental statement wild and scenic river study september 1979 GUNNISON RIVER COLORADO SPECIAL NOTE This environmental statement was initiated by the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation (BOR) and the Colorado Department of Natural Resources in January, 1976. On January 30, 1978, a reorganization within the U.S. Department of the Interior resulted in BOR being restructured and renamed the Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service (HCRS). On March 27, 1978, study responsibility was transferred from HCRS to the National Park Service. The draft environmental statement was prepared by HCRS and cleared by the U.S. Department of the Interior prior to March 27, 1978. Final revisions and publication of both the draft environmental statement, as well as this document have been the responstbility of the National Park Service. FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL STATEMENT GUNNISON WILD AND SCENIC RIVER STUDY Prepared by United States Department of the Interior I National Park Service in cooperation with the Colorado Department of Natural Resources represented by the Water Conservation Board staff Director National Par!< Service SUMMARY ( ) Draft (X) Final Environmental Statement Department of the Interior, National Park Service 1. Type of action: ( ) Administrative (X) Legislative 2. Brief description of action: The Gunnison Wild and Scenic River Study recommends inclusion of a 26-mile (41.8-km) segment of the Gunnison River, Colorado, and 12,900 acres (S,200 ha) of adjacent land to be classified as wild in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System under the administration of the National Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management, U.S. D. I. This river segment extends from the upstream boundary of the Black Canyon of the Gunnison National Monument to approximately 1 mile (1.6 km) below the confluence with the Smith Fork.
    [Show full text]
  • Lands Suitable for Timber Management
    C a S r l a en C Hefty, Mount d k Bushnell Hill z e g Fro r e e e C r k T ree r C C C e olts e r n C k e h e e k k e en e h Tuchuck Mountain r is ek C K re e n C T c tio u a r rv p Sta Th S om a Cr Creek eek Johnson T uc hu ck C T r rail C Bald Mountain ee reek k k e T ek e re r N t C C o Yakinikak Creek ef a k l tl i C o Trailcreek in C k ! Twin Buttes e Cleft Rock Mountain K re e k e r e k C e A T r o C k m o e d k r e a Lewis, Mount S o l ek F a e Cr Wedge Mountain C y r tle e n T e A k Hornet MountainHorne t Creek N Tepee Creek in T Thompson-Seton, Mount k o C T r ee In k u K y oop T a ee Cr Babb C eek Whale Buttes ! re Center Mountain e k k e TT re t Akinkoka Peak n C e m a ge k k na k e o a ree T M C e k k r e e le r n e b ha i r m C i W k T Locke, Mount C se r o o A f o y le M b t ta i Red Buttes T r Su H o ds a n w h La k S Cr eek Huntsberger Peak T Young, Mount T Nasukoin Mountain k n T e a k l e e t P e r s r re C C o F w e 6 c 8 o 9 Hoodoo Hill d u 1 Lake Mountain ea pr S M S p ed rin T R g C re Fortine ek ! T Polebridge !@ Link Mountain ! Ha WhiteTfish Mountain y C re ek Wetzel T ,000 ! k 5 ree 7 n C 1 ra : Mo 1 k e e k .
    [Show full text]
  • Digitalcommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska 1996 Bromegrasses Kenneth P. Vogel University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] K. J. Moore Iowa State University Lowell E. Moser University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub Vogel, Kenneth P.; Moore, K. J.; and Moser, Lowell E., "Bromegrasses" (1996). Publications from USDA- ARS / UNL Faculty. 2097. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usdaarsfacpub/2097 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Department of Agriculture: Agricultural Research Service, Lincoln, Nebraska at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Publications from USDA-ARS / UNL Faculty by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published 1996 17 Bromegrasses1 K.P. VOGEL USDA-ARS Lincoln, Nebraska K.J.MOORE Iowa State University Ames, Iowa LOWELL E. MOSER University of Nebraska Lincoln, Nebraska The bromegrasses belong to the genus Bromus of which there are some 100 spe­ cies (Gould & Shaw, 1983). The genus includes both annual and perennial cool­ season species adapted to temperate climates. Hitchcock (1971) described 42 bro­ megrass species found in the USA and Canada of which 22 were native (Gould & Shaw, 1983). Bromus is the Greek word for oat and refers to the panicle inflo­ rescence characteristic of the genus. The bromegrasses are C3 species (Krenzer et aI., 1975; Waller & Lewis, 1979). Of all the bromegrass species, only two are cultivated for permanent pas­ tures to any extent in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for Wayshowing
    A Framework for Wayshowing West Elk Loop Scenic and Historic Byway Pitkin, Garfield, Gunnison, Delta, and Montrose Counties Colorado July 2016 1 Acknowledgments This plan would not have been possible without the contributions of the Steering Committee of the West Elk Loop Scenic & Historic Byway: John Hoffmann, Chair, Dave Roberts, Member at Large and Vice‐Chair, Dorothea Farris, Member at Large and Treasurer, and Martha Moran, Secretary. Thanks to who participated in the exit interview: John Hoffmann, Dave Roberts, Dorothea Farris, Kelli Hepler, Susan Hansen, Gloria Crank, Gloria Cunningham, and Beth White Appreciation is also extended to the participants of the Wayfinding Assessment Team, who donated their time to spend a day behind the wheel. Thanks to Front Seaters: Vince Matthews (Geologist), Bill Kight (Museum and Public Lands), Robin Waters (Visitor Center), and Cherlyn Crawford (Musician) first time visitor to the West Elk Loop Scenic & Historic Byway. Back Seaters: Lisa Langer (Tourism Professional), Vicky Nash (Tourism Professional), Ken Brubaker (Transportation Engineer), and Bill Crawford (Transportation Engineer). Special thanks to Lenore Bates, Scenic Byways Program Manager, Colorado Department of Transportation for her guidance throughout the project. This project was designed using concepts based on the work of David Dahlquist and the America’s Byways Resource Center. Document Produced By: Walden Mills Group Judy Walden, President Jon Schler, Consultant July 2016 Cover photo: Paonia Reservoir, looking east from Highway
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO
    Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area August 2015 CNHP’s mission is to preserve the natural diversity of life by contributing the essential scientific foundation that leads to lasting conservation of Colorado's biological wealth. Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University 1475 Campus Delivery Fort Collins, CO 80523 (970) 491-7331 Report Prepared for: United States Air Force Academy Department of Natural Resources Recommended Citation: Smith, P., S. S. Panjabi, and J. Handwerk. 2015. Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan: US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area, El Paso County, CO. Colorado Natural Heritage Program, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. Front Cover: Documenting weeds at the US Air Force Academy. Photos courtesy of the Colorado Natural Heritage Program © Integrated Noxious Weed Management Plan US Air Force Academy and Farish Recreation Area El Paso County, CO Pam Smith, Susan Spackman Panjabi, and Jill Handwerk Colorado Natural Heritage Program Warner College of Natural Resources Colorado State University Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 August 2015 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Various federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, orders, and policies require land managers to control noxious weeds. The purpose of this plan is to provide a guide to manage, in the most efficient and effective manner, the noxious weeds on the US Air Force Academy (Academy) and Farish Recreation Area (Farish) over the next 10 years (through 2025), in accordance with their respective integrated natural resources management plans. This plan pertains to the “natural” portions of the Academy and excludes highly developed areas, such as around buildings, recreation fields, and lawns.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, and Gunnison National Forests DRAFT Wilderness Evaluation Report August 2018 Designated in the original Wilderness Act of 1964, the Maroon Bells-Snowmass Wilderness covers more than 183,000 acres spanning the Gunnison and White River National Forests. In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncompahgre Wilderness Trails
    TH Little Cimarron TH Big WARNING: Do not use this map for wilderness Blue navigation. It is intended for general reference 864 UNCOMPAHGRE 229 only. Detailed maps are available at the locations 863 East shown on the back panel. Fork 867 TH Fall WILDERNESS 858 861 TH Creek 868 149 Little Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre, 232 Elk Fall Creek TH 868 Little Cimarron River & Gunnison National Forests East Fork Cimarron River A 254 231 Straley 03/14/11 12 219 Middle Fork Cimarron River West Fork Cimarron River Owl Creek 233 Pass Sheep Mountain 253 Stealey 219 228 Mountain Big Blue Creek Middle TH Fork 244 860 218 Slide Courthouse Pinnacle 229 Lake Mountain 218 Ridge Dunsinane Elk Creek 144 Mountain 218 857 Precipice 211 Peak 243 Dixie 550 258 Ridge Porphory 227 Basin Silver Jack 232 Mine Ruins 235 212 Silver Mountain 216 216 234 TH Independence 138 226 231 228 233 137 Cutler Redcliff 244 Peak TH 236 235 216 Coxcomb Peak 227 232 872 220 236.3A 217 132 142 Uncompahgre Peak Larson 14,309 Ft Lakes Matterhorn 135 228 239 Lake Fork Gunnison River Peak 871 Cow Creek Uncompahgre 236 B Wetterhorn Wetterhorn 239 TH 149 Peak Basin Peak 233 14 14,015 Ft 205 233 233 226 Crystal Peak 256 235 136 Crystal Uncompahgre River 214 Bighorn Larson 241 Ridge 245 Crystal Broken 238 TH North Hill Lake Bridge of 236 215 Heaven 877 226 TH Matterhorn USFS 140 Lake City 1 Mile Blackwall BLM Mountain Ouray 870 215 20 Alpine Loop USFS Capitol City Scenic Byway Primary Highway Summit Over 13,000 Feet Wildhorse BLM (Site) Peak Improved Road Stock May Be Restricted Hensen Creek A1 Dallas A2 Courthouse Mountain A3 Sheep Mountain Primitive Road TH Trailhead TH Bear 241 A4 Alpine Plateau Creek B1 Ouray National Forest Trail 235 National Forest Trail Sunshine B2 Wetterhorn Peak American Darley Varden Flats Mountain B3 Uncompahgre Peak NOTICE: Sheep grazing is permitted in the Uncompahgre Wilderness, Mountain B4 Lake City and livestock protection dogs may be encountered near bands of Forest Boundary 118 National Forest Road sheep.
    [Show full text]