DOCSLIB.ORG

Julian Sorell Huxley

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

In this pdf: UNESCO Its Purpose and Its Philosophy Brent Jessop - Knowledge Driven Revolution.com Part 1: World Evolutionary Humanism, Eugenics and UNESCO | May 19, 2008 Part 2: The Task of Unifying the World Mind | May 26, 2008 Part 3: Education for World Government | June 2, 2008 Part 4: Guiding Society Through Art and Science | June 9, 2008 Part 5: The Mass Media Division of UNESCO | June 16, 2008 ————————————————————————————————————————————— BIOGRAPHICAL CHRONOLOGY OF JULIAN SORELL HUXLEY 1 peace and security and with human wel- World Evolutionary Humanism, fare, in so far as they can be subserved by the educational and scientific and cultural Eugenics and UNESCO relations of the peoples of the world. Ac- UNESCO Its Purpose and Its Philosophy ¥ Part 1 cordingly its outlook must, it seems, be Brent Jessop - Knowledge Driven Revolution.com • May 19, 2008 based on some form of humanism. Fur- http://www.KnowledgeDrivenRevolution.com/Articles/200805/20080519_UNESCO_1_Philosophy.htm ther, that humanism must clearly be a world humanism, both in the sense of seek- "That [fundamental] task [of UNESCO] is to help the emergence of a single world ing to bring in all the peoples of the world, culture, with its own philosophy and background of ideas, and with its own broad and of treating all peoples and all individu- purpose. This is opportune, since this is the first time in history that the scaffolding als within each people as equals in terms and the mechanisms for world unification have become available, and also the first of human dignity, mutual respect, and edu- time that man has had the means (in the shape of scientific discovery and its cational opportunity. It must also be a sci- applications) of laying a world-wide foundation for the minimum physical welfare of entific humanism, in the sense that the ap- the entire human species. And it is necessary, for at the moment two opposing plication of science provides most of the philosophies of life confront each other from the West and from the East, and not only material basis for human culture, and also impede the achievement of unity but threaten to become the foci of actual conflict. that the practice and the understanding of You may categorise the two philosophies as two super-nationalisms; or as individu- science need to be integrated with that of alism versus collectivism; or as the American versus the Russian way of life; or as other human activities. It cannot, however, capitalism versus communism; or as Christianity versus Marxism; or in half a dozen be materialistic, but must embrace the other ways. The fact of their opposition remains and the further fact that round each spiritual and mental as well as the mate- of them are crystallising the lives and thoughts and political aspirations of hundreds rial aspects of existence, and must attempt of millions of human beings. Can this conflict be avoided, these opposites be to do so on a truly monistic, unitary philo- reconciled, this antitheses be resolved in a higher syntheses? I believe not only that sophic basis. this can happen, but that, through the inexorable dialectic of evolution, it must Finally it must be an evolutionary as op- happen - only I do not know whether it will happen before or after another war." - 61 posed to a static or ideal humanism. It is essential for Unesco to adopt an evolution- As the first Director of UNESCO (United Kalinga Prize (1953) and ary approach. If it does not do so, its phi- Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural the Special Award of the losophy will be a false one, its humanism Organisation), Sir Julian Sorell Huxley Lasker Foundation in the at best partial, at worst misleading. We will (1887-1975) wrote a paper entitled UNESCO category Planned Parent- justify this assertion in detail later. Here it Its Purpose and Its Philosophy (1946) [1] in hood - World Population is only necessary to recall that in the last which he outlined his vision for the newly (1959) to name but a few decades it has been possible to develop created international organisation (which few. He is also the an extended or general theory of evolu- grew out of the League of Nations' Institute Grandson of Thomas Huxley (Darwin's Bull- tion which can provide the necessary of Intellectual Co-operation). According to dog) and brother of author Aldous Huxley. intellectual scaffolding for modern hu- Huxley, the guiding philosophy of UNESCO manism. It not only shows us man's place should be what he termed, World Evolution- in nature and his relations to the rest of ary Humanism. The following article describes UNESCO Philosophy of the phenomenal universe, not only gives this philosophy and its relation to eugenics. World Evolutionary Humanism us a description of the various types of evo- Julian Huxley, an evolutionary biologist, hu- lution and the various trends and directions From UNESCO Its Purpose and Its Philosophy: manist, and ardent internationalist held many within them, but allows us to distinguish titles including: Secretary of the Zoological [Italicised text is original emphasis and desirable and undesirable trends, and to Society of London (1935-42), first president bolded text is added by author.] demonstrate the existence of progress in of the British Humanist Association (1963), the cosmos. And finally it shows us man "But in order to carry out its work, an Vice-President (1937-44) and President as now the sole trustee of further evolu- organisation such as Unesco needs not (1959-62) of the British Eugenics Society. tionary progress, and gives us important only a set of general aims and objects for He was also a founding member of the World guidance as to the courses he should avoid itself, but also a working philosophy, a Wild Life Fund, coined the term and those he should pursue if he is to working hypothesis concerning human "transhumanism" (as a means of disguising achieve that progress. existence and its aims and objects, which eugenics) and gave two Galton memorial lec- will dictate, or at least indicate, a definite An evolutionary approach provides the tures (1936, 1962). Huxley also received line of approach to its problems." - 6 link between natural science and human many awards including the Darwin Medal history; it teaches us the need to think in of the Royal Society (1956), UNESCO's "Its [UNESCO's] main concern is with the dynamic terms of speed and direction 2 rather than in the static ones of momen- utilising the old innate potentialities, in- the current democratic doctrine of equal- tary position or quantitative achievement; stead of in the nature of these potentiali- ity. In face of it, indeed, the principle of it not only shows us the origin and bio- ties, as in the biological sector. [...] Nor equality of opportunity must be amended logical roots of our human values, but does it mean that man's innate mental pow- to read "equality of opportunity within gives us some basis and external standards ers could not be improved. They certainly the limits of aptitude." " - 18 for them among the apparently neutral were improved (presumably be [sic] natu- "Biological inequality is, of course, the mass of natural phenomena; and it is in- ral selection) in the earliest stages of his bedrock fact on which all of eugenics is dispensable in enabling us to pick out, career, [...] and they could certainly be predicated. But it is not usually realised among the chaotic welter of conflicting improved further by deliberate eugenic that the two types of inequality have quite tendencies to-day, those trends and activi- measures, if we consciously set ourselves different and indeed contrary eugenic im- ties and methods which Unesco should to improve them. Meanwhile, however, it plications. The inequality of mere differ- emphasise and facilitate. is in social organisation, in machines, and ence is desirable, and the preservation of in ideas that human evolution is mostly Thus the general philosophy of Unesco human variety should be one of the two made manifest." - 9 should, it seems, be a scientific world primary aims of eugenics. But the inequal- humanism, global in extent and evolu- ity of level or standard is undesirable, and tionary in background. What are the fur- Eugenics the other primary aim of eugenics should ther implications, practical as well as theo- In the philosophy outlined above, there is a be the raising of the mean level of all de- retical, of such an outlook? We must ex- lot of high sounding idealistic language about sirable qualities. While there may be dis- amine these in some detail before coming equality. For example the quote below. pute over certain qualities, there can be down to a consideration of Unesco's ac- none over a number of the most impor- "Further, that humanism must clearly be a tivity section by section." - 7 tant, such as a healthy constitution, a high world humanism, both in the sense of seek- innate general intelligence, or a special ap- "Our first task must be to clarify the no- ing to bring in all the peoples of the world, titude such as that for mathematics or tion of desirable and undesirable directions and of treating all peoples and all individu- music. of evolution, for on this will depend our als within each people as equals in terms attitude to human progress - to the possi- of human dignity, mutual respect, and edu- At the moment, it is probable that the in- bility of progress in the first place, and then cational opportunity." - 7 direct effect of civilisation is dysgenic in- to its definition." - 8 stead of eugenic; and in any case it seems Of course, for eugenicists like Huxley, some likely that the dead weight of genetic stu- "But once more a new and more efficient are more equal than others.
Recommended publications
  • Yasha Gall, Julian Sorell Huxley, 1887-1975

    Yasha Gall, Julian Sorell Huxley, 1887-1975

    Julian Sorell Huxley, 1887-1975 Yasha Gall Published by Nauka, St. Petersburg, Russia, 2004 Reproduced as an e-book with kind permission of Nauka Science editor: Academician AL Takhtajan Preface by the Science Editor The 20th century was the epoch of discovery in evolutionary biology, marked by many fundamental investigations. Of special significance were the works of AN Severtsov, SS Chetverikov, S Wright, JBS Haldane, G De Beer JS Huxley and R Goldschmidt. Among the general works on evolutionary theory, the one of greatest breadth was Julian Huxley’s book Evolution: The Modern Synthesis (1942). Huxley was one of the first to analyze the mechanisms of macro-evolutionary processes and discuss the evolutionary role of neoteny in terms of developmental genetics (the speed of gene action). Neoteny—the most important mechanism of heritable variation of ontogenesis—has great macro-evolutionary consequences. A Russian translation of Huxley’s book on evolution was prepared for publication by Professor VV Alpatov. The manuscript of the translation had already been sent to production when the August session of the VASKNIL in 1948 burst forth—a destructive moment in the history of biology in our country. The publication was halted, and the manuscript disappeared. I remember well a meeting with Huxley in 1945 in Moscow and Leningrad during the celebratory jubilee at the Academy of Sciences. He was deeply disturbed by the “blossoming” of Lysenkoist obscurantism in biology. It is also important to note that in the 1950s Huxley developed original concepts for controlling the birth rate of the Earth’s population. He openly declared the necessity of forming an international institute at the United Nations, since the global ecosystem already could not sustain the pressure of human “activity” and, together with humanity, might itself die.
  • Charles Darwin: a Companion

    Charles Darwin: a Companion

    CHARLES DARWIN: A COMPANION Charles Darwin aged 59. Reproduction of a photograph by Julia Margaret Cameron, original 13 x 10 inches, taken at Dumbola Lodge, Freshwater, Isle of Wight in July 1869. The original print is signed and authenticated by Mrs Cameron and also signed by Darwin. It bears Colnaghi's blind embossed registration. [page 3] CHARLES DARWIN A Companion by R. B. FREEMAN Department of Zoology University College London DAWSON [page 4] First published in 1978 © R. B. Freeman 1978 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publisher: Wm Dawson & Sons Ltd, Cannon House Folkestone, Kent, England Archon Books, The Shoe String Press, Inc 995 Sherman Avenue, Hamden, Connecticut 06514 USA British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Freeman, Richard Broke. Charles Darwin. 1. Darwin, Charles – Dictionaries, indexes, etc. 575′. 0092′4 QH31. D2 ISBN 0–7129–0901–X Archon ISBN 0–208–01739–9 LC 78–40928 Filmset in 11/12 pt Bembo Printed and bound in Great Britain by W & J Mackay Limited, Chatham [page 5] CONTENTS List of Illustrations 6 Introduction 7 Acknowledgements 10 Abbreviations 11 Text 17–309 [page 6] LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Charles Darwin aged 59 Frontispiece From a photograph by Julia Margaret Cameron Skeleton Pedigree of Charles Robert Darwin 66 Pedigree to show Charles Robert Darwin's Relationship to his Wife Emma 67 Wedgwood Pedigree of Robert Darwin's Children and Grandchildren 68 Arms and Crest of Robert Waring Darwin 69 Research Notes on Insectivorous Plants 1860 90 Charles Darwin's Full Signature 91 [page 7] INTRODUCTION THIS Companion is about Charles Darwin the man: it is not about evolution by natural selection, nor is it about any other of his theoretical or experimental work.
  • Philosophical Rhetoric in Early Quantum Mechanics, 1925-1927

    Philosophical Rhetoric in Early Quantum Mechanics, 1925-1927

    b1043_Chapter-2.4.qxd 1/27/2011 7:30 PM Page 319 b1043 Quantum Mechanics and Weimar Culture FA 319 Philosophical Rhetoric in Early Quantum Mechanics 1925–27: High Principles, Cultural Values and Professional Anxieties Alexei Kojevnikov* ‘I look on most general reasoning in science as [an] opportunistic (success- or unsuccessful) relationship between conceptions more or less defined by other conception[s] and helping us to overlook [danicism for “survey”] things.’ Niels Bohr (1919)1 This paper considers the role played by philosophical conceptions in the process of the development of quantum mechanics, 1925–1927, and analyses stances taken by key participants on four main issues of the controversy (Anschaulichkeit, quantum discontinuity, the wave-particle dilemma and causality). Social and cultural values and anxieties at the time of general crisis, as identified by Paul Forman, strongly affected the language of the debate. At the same time, individual philosophical positions presented as strongly-held principles were in fact flexible and sometimes reversible to almost their opposites. One can understand the dynamics of rhetorical shifts and changing strategies, if one considers interpretational debates as a way * Department of History, University of British Columbia, 1873 East Mall, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z1; [email protected]. The following abbreviations are used: AHQP, Archive for History of Quantum Physics, NBA, Copenhagen; AP, Annalen der Physik; HSPS, Historical Studies in the Physical Sciences; NBA, Niels Bohr Archive, Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen; NW, Die Naturwissenschaften; PWB, Wolfgang Pauli, Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel mit Bohr, Einstein, Heisenberg a.o., Band I: 1919–1929, ed. A. Hermann, K.V.
  • Brave New World & Brave New World Revisited Ebook

    Brave New World & Brave New World Revisited Ebook

    BRAVE NEW WORLD & BRAVE NEW WORLD REVISITED PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Aldous Huxley | 340 pages | 01 Jun 2004 | HarperCollins Publishers Inc | 9780060535261 | English | New York, NY, United States Brave New World & Brave New World Revisited PDF Book I Brave New World A difficult book to rate. It will spread, not through government policy but through the choices of individual parents, likely accelerating as the technology becomes cheaper and more efficient. Brave New World A difficult book to rate. He spent the latter part of his life in the United States, living in Los Angeles from until his death in Toward the end of the story, can the reader maintain that safe distance? His letter to Orwell after the younger man sent him a copy of seems touchy The non-fiction work Brave New World Revisited , published in , is a fascinating work in which Huxley uses his tremendous knowledge of human relations to compare the modern-day world with his prophetic fantasy envisioned in Brave New World , including the threats to humanity, such as over-population, propaganda, and chemical persuasion. That's the tragedy of Brave New World Amazing thing being, Huxley extrapolated the contents of this entire book just from a single TV interview which he gave being disillusioned about how his fantasy can easily get real soon. He is unusually short for an Alpha; an alleged accident with alcohol in Bernard's blood- surrogate before his decanting has left him slightly stunted. My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power, and these ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World'.
  • Brave New World: the Correlation of Social Order and the Process Of

    Brave New World: the Correlation of Social Order and the Process Of

    Brave New World: The Correlation of Social Order and the Process of Literary Translation by Maria Reinhard A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfilment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Master of Arts in German Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2008 ! Maria Reinhard 2008 Author's Declaration I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. ii Abstract This comparative analysis of four different German-language versions of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World (1932) shows the correlation between political and socio- cultural circumstances, as well as ideological differences, and translations of the novel. The first German translation was created by Herberth E. Herlitschka in 1932, entitled Welt – Wohin? Two further versions of it were released in 1950 and 1981. In 1978, the East German publisher Das Neue Berlin published a new translation created by Eva Walch, entitled Schöne neue Welt. My thesis focuses on the first translations by both Herlitschka and Walch, but takes into account the others as well. The methodological basis is Heidemarie Salevsky’s tripartite model. With its focus on author and work, commissioning institution and translator, it was developed as a tool to determine the factors influencing the process of literary translation. Within this framework, the translations are contextualized within the cultural and political circumstances of the Weimar and German Democratic Republics, including an historical overview of the two main publishers, Insel and Das Neue Berlin.
  • Charles Galton Darwin's 1922 Quantum Theory of Optical Dispersion

    Charles Galton Darwin's 1922 Quantum Theory of Optical Dispersion

    Eur. Phys. J. H https://doi.org/10.1140/epjh/e2020-80058-7 THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL H Charles Galton Darwin's 1922 quantum theory of optical dispersion Benjamin Johnson1,2, a 1 Max Planck Institute for the History of Science Boltzmannstraße 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany 2 Fritz-Haber-Institut der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft Faradayweg 4, 14195 Berlin, Germany Received 13 October 2017 / Received in final form 4 February 2020 Published online 29 May 2020 c The Author(s) 2020. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract. The quantum theory of dispersion was an important concep- tual advancement which led out of the crisis of the old quantum theory in the early 1920s and aided in the formulation of matrix mechanics in 1925. The theory of Charles Galton Darwin, often cited only for its reliance on the statistical conservation of energy, was a wave-based attempt to explain dispersion phenomena at a time between the the- ories of Ladenburg and Kramers. It contributed to future successes in quantum theory, such as the virtual oscillator, while revealing through its own shortcomings the limitations of the wave theory of light in the interaction of light and matter. After its publication, Darwin's theory was widely discussed amongst his colleagues as the competing inter- pretation to Compton's in X-ray scattering experiments. It also had a pronounced influence on John C. Slater, whose ideas formed the basis of the BKS theory. 1 Introduction Charles Galton Darwin mainly appears in the literature on the development of quantum mechanics in connection with his early and explicit opinions on the non- conservation (or statistical conservation) of energy and his correspondence with Niels Bohr.
  • Masterarbeit / Master's Thesis

    Masterarbeit / Master's Thesis

    MASTERARBEIT / MASTER’S THESIS Titel der Masterarbeit / Title of the Master‘s Thesis Out in Africa: The Ambivalent Relationship between the Colonizer and the Colonized in the Selected Works by the White Settler Authors Karen Blixen and Elspeth Huxley verfasst von / submitted by Amel Zairi angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) Wien, 2016/ Vienna 2016 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 066 844 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / Anglophone Literatures and Cultures degree programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Igor Maver Acknowledgments First of all, I would like to thank my supervisor Univ.-Prof. Dr. Igor Maver for his constructive feedback, guidance, patience and support. Thank you for keeping the door open, whenever I needed to consult you! I wish also to express my warm thanks to my friends and cousins for their affectionate care, for their constant encouragement, and for easing my worries throughout the writing process, as they have always done in all the difficult times I went through in my studies. All love goes to my family, especially my parents to whom I am very grateful for without them this thesis would not have been possible. Ma and Pa, I am very proud to have you in my life! DECLARATION OF AUTHENTICITY I confirm to have conceived and written this Diploma Thesis in English all by myself. Quotations from other authors are all clearly marked and acknowledged in the bibliographical references, either in the footnotes or within the text.
  • The Project Gutenberg Ebook #35588: <TITLE>

    The Project Gutenberg Ebook #35588: <TITLE>

    The Project Gutenberg EBook of Scientific Papers by Sir George Howard Darwin, by George Darwin This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org Title: Scientific Papers by Sir George Howard Darwin Volume V. Supplementary Volume Author: George Darwin Commentator: Francis Darwin E. W. Brown Editor: F. J. M. Stratton J. Jackson Release Date: March 16, 2011 [EBook #35588] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK SCIENTIFIC PAPERS *** Produced by Andrew D. Hwang, Laura Wisewell, Chuck Greif and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (The original copy of this book was generously made available for scanning by the Department of Mathematics at the University of Glasgow.) transcriber's note The original copy of this book was generously made available for scanning by the Department of Mathematics at the University of Glasgow. Minor typographical corrections and presentational changes have been made without comment. This PDF file is optimized for screen viewing, but may easily be recompiled for printing. Please see the preamble of the LATEX source file for instructions. SCIENTIFIC PAPERS CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS C. F. CLAY, Manager Lon˘n: FETTER LANE, E.C. Edinburgh: 100 PRINCES STREET New York: G. P. PUTNAM'S SONS Bom`y, Calcutta and Madras: MACMILLAN AND CO., Ltd. Toronto: J. M. DENT AND SONS, Ltd. Tokyo: THE MARUZEN-KABUSHIKI-KAISHA All rights reserved SCIENTIFIC PAPERS BY SIR GEORGE HOWARD DARWIN K.C.B., F.R.S.
  • 'Great Is Darwin and Bergson His Poet': Julian Huxley's Other

    'Great Is Darwin and Bergson His Poet': Julian Huxley's Other

    This is a repository copy of ‘Great is Darwin and Bergson his poet’: Julian Huxley's other evolutionary synthesis. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/124449/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Herring, E (2018) ‘Great is Darwin and Bergson his poet’: Julian Huxley's other evolutionary synthesis. Annals of Science, 75 (1). pp. 40-54. ISSN 0003-3790 https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2017.1407442 (c) 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Annals of Science on 04 Jan 2018, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/00033790.2017.1407442 Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ “Great is Darwin and Bergson his poet”: Julian Huxley’s Other Evolutionary Synthesis. Emily Herring School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom Email: [email protected] Address: School of Philosophy, Religion and History of Science, University of Leeds, Woodhouse Lane, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom Orcid id: orcid.org/0000-0002-8377-6319 1 “Great is Darwin and Bergson his poet”: Julian Huxley’s Other Evolutionary Synthesis.
  • The Prodigious Life and Untimely Death of “Harry” Moseley

    The Prodigious Life and Untimely Death of “Harry” Moseley

    The prodigious life and untimely death of “Harry” Moseley Bretislav Friedrich Fritz Haber Institute of the Max Planck Society, Faradayweg 4-6, D-14195 Berlin “My Harry was killed in the Dardanelles” is the entry from 10 August 1915 in the diary of the mother of Henry (“Harry”) Gwin Jeffreys Moseley. He was shot on that day in the head during the failed Anglo-French invasion of the Ottoman Empire from the sea. The previous year, when he volunteered to join Lord Kitchener’s New Army, he was nominated for two Nobel Prizes, one for chemistry and one for physics, for his work on X-ray spectroscopy and atomic structure. Moseley’s tragic death at age 27 was widely reported not just in the Allied countries, but also in Germany. Its futility fired up Ernest Rutherford, Moseley’s mentor, to write an indignant letter to Nature: “It is a national tragedy that our military organization at the start of the war was so inelastic as to be unable, with a few exceptions, to utilise the scientific services of our men, except as combatants in the firing line. Our regret for the untimely death of Moseley is all the more poignant.” Three years before, as Rutherford’s affiliate at the University of Manchester, Moseley recognized that “a platinum target [upon electron impact] gives out a sharp line [X-ray] spectrum … which [a] crystal separates out [into monochromatic lines] as if it were a diffraction grating … There is here a whole new branch of spectroscopy which is sure to tell one much about the nature of an atom.” This letter of Moseley, addressed, as so many of his other letters, to his mother, marks the beginning of X-ray spectroscopy.
  • Balfour V. Huxley on Evolutionary Naturalism: a 21St Century Perspective

    Balfour V. Huxley on Evolutionary Naturalism: a 21St Century Perspective

    S & CB (2003), 15, 41–63 0954–4194 JOHN GREENE Balfour v. Huxley on Evolutionary Naturalism: A 21st century Perspective This essay begins by setting forth the conflicting prophecies, in 1895, of Arthur James Balfour and Thomas Henry Huxley concerning the probable course of Western culture in the twentieth century if Huxley’s ‘scientific naturalism’ were to prevail over Balfour’s theistic conception of the relations between science and religion. The essay then examines some leading developments in the physical, biological, and social sciences and in philosophy and theology since 1900 to determine which of these prophecies, if either, proved to be truly prophetic. The author concludes that Balfour was the better prophet. Keywords: evolution, naturalism, positivism, emergence, metaphor, science, philosophy, theology. In 1895, Arthur James Balfour, a philosophically trained Scottish politician- statesman then serving as Chancellor of the Exchequer, published a book enti- tled Foundations of Belief, Being Notes Introductory to the Study of Theology containing a searching criticism of the evolutionary naturalism which Thomas Henry Huxley had labeled ‘scientific naturalism’. The naturalism underlying positivism, agnosticism, and empiricism, Balfour argued, rested on two grounds: (1) it reduced human experience to sense perception with the result that the only knowledge available to human beings was knowledge of phe- nomena, the things that appear to our senses, and the laws connecting them; and (2) it viewed human nature in all its aspects as
  • Who Got Moseley's Prize?

    Who Got Moseley's Prize?

    Chapter 4 Who Got Moseley’s Prize? Virginia Trimble1 and Vera V. Mainz*,2 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California 92697-4575, United States 2Department of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61802, United States *E-mail: [email protected]. Henry Gwyn Jeffreys Moseley (1887-1915) made prompt and very skilled use of the then new technique of X-ray scattering by crystals (Bragg scattering) to solve several problems about the periodic table and atoms. He was nominated for both the chemistry and physics Nobel Prizes by Svante Arrhenius in 1915, but was dead at Gallipoli before the committees finished their deliberations. Instead, the 1917 physics prize (announced in 1918 and presented on 6 June 1920) went to Charles Glover Barkla (1877-1944) “for discovery of the Röntgen radiation of the elements.” This, and his discovery of X-ray polarization, were done with earlier techniques that he never gave up. Moseley’s contemporaries and later historians of science have written that he would have gone on to other major achievements and a Nobel Prize if he had lived. In contrast, after about 1916, Barkla moved well outside the scientific mainstream, clinging to upgrades of his older methods, denying the significance of the Bohr atom and quantization, and continuing to report evidence for what he called the J phenomenon. This chapter addresses the lives and scientific endeavors of Moseley and Barkla, something about the context in which they worked and their connections with other scientists, contemporary, earlier, and later. © 2017 American Chemical Society Introduction Henry Moseley’s (Figure 1) academic credentials consisted of a 1910 Oxford BA with first-class honors in Mathematical Moderations and a second in Natural Sciences (physics) and the MA that followed more or less automatically a few years later.