DOCSLIB.ORG

Seismic Analysis and Design Approach Document

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Seismic Analysis and Design Approach Document ENG.20071220.0029 (--7(;.,.. "'" · '~==--'--'\ QA:QA i../ I ~i'·"··1~',,:,:::,: ; '-~ffi""--~, 000-30R-MGRO-02000-000-001 j ,,/ I / . i ./" .. ._...J i ~//~ '-:;,~ /) BECHTEL December 2007 SAIC COMPANYUC Seismic Analysis and Design Approach Document Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Office of Civilian Radioactive Waste Management 1551 Hillshire Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89134-6321 Prepared by: Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC 1180 Town Center Drive Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Under Contract Number DE-AC28-01 RW121 01 DISCLAIMER This document was developed by Bechtel SAIC Company, LLC (BSC) and is solely intended for the use of BSC in its work for the Yucca Mountain Project. 000-30R-MGR0-02000-000-001 ii December 2007 Technical Report Signature Pagel 1. QA: QA Change History esc 2. Total Pages: 152 Complete only applicable items. 3. Technical Report Title Seismic Analysis and Design Approach Document 4. 01 (including Rev. No.) 000-30R-MGRO-02000-000-001 Printed Name Sj9nature Date A 5. Originator th/tJt/d,:'I£,·~lk Iv ~ t. ~11 It/I2-!WC'7 Orhan Gurbuz / Surendra K. Goel '/7"'-- 0/ t:~/L-~ .. • 6. Checker Michael Soltani \'\\\~~~ , L{(1.. lo1 7. QER Gerard Heaney ~ ;f,'t1~L , ~/ t,lr1-Jo i (! 8. Lead or Supervisor Thomas Frankert c1Im U'~d " I~/~~/t-:} ,il'ntCl-:; 9. Responsible Manager or Raj Rajagopal j 'z. j '2,.0 j2.(,"{j) Project Engineer ~ 10. Remarks \J 'I I ---' Change History 11. Revision No. 12. Description of Change 000 Initial issue. This issue supersedes 100-S0C-CYOO-00300-000-00A and 100-S0C-CYOO-00300-000• 00A-ECN1. It provides an update to the seismic analysis and design approach requirements and changes the format from a design calculation to a technical report. 001 Complete Revision. Incorporated ACN01, the revised ground response spectra, fragility calculation methodology, added Appendix F on seismic requirements for mechanical equipment and other miscellaneous changes. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 000-30R-MGR0-02000-000-001 iv December 2007 CONTENTS Page ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS...................................................................................... xi 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................................1 2. SCOPE .......................................................................................................................................2 3. FACILITY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION .......................................................................3 3.1 FACILITY LOCATION...................................................................................................3 3.2 FACILITY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................3 4. ASSUMPTIONS, DIRECT INPUTS, QUALITY ASSURANCE, SOFTWARE USAGE, AND PEER REVIEW ................................................................................................8 4.1 ASSUMPTIONS...............................................................................................................8 4.2 DIRECT INPUTS .............................................................................................................8 4.3 QUALITY ASSURANCE................................................................................................8 4.4 SOFTWARE USAGE.......................................................................................................8 4.5 PEER REVIEW ................................................................................................................8 5. SEISMIC CLASSIFICATION OF SSCs.................................................................................10 5.1 CRITERIA FOR SEISMIC CLASSIFICATION OF SSCs ...........................................10 5.2 ITS SSCs.........................................................................................................................11 5.3 SEISMIC INTERACTION OF NON-ITS SSCs WITH ITS SSCs................................12 5.4 NON-ITS SSCs...............................................................................................................12 6. DESIGN MOTION..................................................................................................................14 6.1 GENERAL......................................................................................................................14 6.2 GEOTECHNICAL PARAMETERS ..............................................................................14 6.3 DESIGN BASIS GROUND MOTION (DBGM) FOR ITS STRUCTURES ................16 6.4 DESIGN BASIS GROUND MOTION FOR NON-ITS STRUCTURES ......................31 7. SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF ITS SSCs ......................................................................................34 7.1 METHODOLOGY .........................................................................................................34 7.2 ANALYSES PARAMETERS ........................................................................................36 7.3 SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES ..............................................42 7.4 SEISMIC STRESS ANALYSIS OF STRUCTURES ....................................................43 7.5 SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS .....................................45 7.6 SEISMIC EVALUATION OF STRUCTURES FOR BDBGM.....................................48 7.7 SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF UNDERGROUND ITS SSCs .............................................48 8. SEISMIC DESIGN OF ITS SSCs ...........................................................................................50 8.1 GENERAL......................................................................................................................50 8.2 DESIGN CODES............................................................................................................50 8.3 LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS......................................................................50 000-30R-MGR0-02000-000-001 v December 2007 CONTENTS (Continued) Page 8.4 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA...........................................................................................52 9. SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF NON-ITS SSCs ............................................................................54 9.1 GENERAL......................................................................................................................54 9.2 SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF NON-ITS STRUCTURES ..................................................54 9.3 SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF NON-ITS, NON-BUILDING STRUCTURES...................55 9.4 SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF NON-ITS SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS ....................56 10. SEISMIC DESIGN OF NON-ITS SSCs .................................................................................58 10.1 GENERAL......................................................................................................................58 10.2 DESIGN CODES............................................................................................................58 10.3 LOADS AND LOAD COMBINATIONS......................................................................58 10.4 ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA...........................................................................................59 11. MISCELLANEOUS SEISMIC ANALYSIS AND DESIGN ISSUES..................................60 11.1 STABILITY REQUIREMENTS....................................................................................60 11.2 STORY DRIFTS.............................................................................................................61 11.3 INTERACTION OF NON-ITS WITH ITS SSCs (Seismic 2/1 Issue)...........................61 11.4 BUILDING SEPARATION ...........................................................................................62 11.5 ANCHORAGE ...............................................................................................................62 12. USE OF COMPUTER PROGRAMS ......................................................................................63 13. REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................65 13.1 DOCUMENTS CITED...................................................................................................65 13.2 CODES, STANDARDS, REGULATIONS, AND PROCEDURES..............................67 13.3 SOURCE DATA.............................................................................................................69 13.4 SOFTWARE CODES.....................................................................................................70 APPENDIX A COMPUTATION OF COMBINED EARTHQUAKE-INDUCED STRUCTURAL RESPONSE............................................................................71 APPENDIX B EVALUATIONS FOR BDBGM ......................................................................75 APPENDIX C SOIL SPRINGS AND DAMPING .................................................................103 APPENDIX D SHEAR WALL STRUCTURES DESIGN PROCEDURE.............................107 APPENDIX E INCORPORATION OF CONCRETE CRACKING INTO THE FINITE ELEMENT MODEL..........................................................................135 APPENDIX F SEISMIC REQUIREMENTS FOR MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT.............137 000-30R-MGR0-02000-000-001 vi December 2007 FIGURES Page 3-1. Site Plan ............................................................................................................................4 3-2. Facilities Building Location Plan......................................................................................5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Using Opensees for Analyzing a 9- Story Steel Building Under Post- Earthquake Fires
    Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers of Earthquake Engineering July 21-25, 2014 10NCEE Anchorage, Alaska USING OPENSEES FOR ANALYZING A 9- STORY STEEL BUILDING UNDER POST- EARTHQUAKE FIRES N. Elhami Khorasani1 and M. E. M. Garlock2 ABSTRACT Post-earthquake fires are major hazards with possible intense consequences. Civil engineering design is moving towards the concept of resilient cities, which requires buildings with structural systems to perform adequately after extreme hazards and ensure human safety. Current codes and standards in fire engineering are mainly based on design at the component level and deterministic approaches, where uncertainties in variables are not directly incorporated in the design process. Reliability-based approaches offer better means of evaluating resilience in the face of extreme hazards. But to measure resilience in an earthquake-fire multi-hazard scenario, uncertainties in the system must be captured, and nonlinear analyses must seamlessly transfer from seismic to fire analysis. This paper discusses the successes and challenges of this seamless analysis using the open source software OpenSees. A 9-story steel building with moment resisting frames is subject to fire following earthquake while being modeled in OpenSees. With the newly added fire module in OpenSees, the software has the capacity to perform structural analysis for both seismic and thermal loads. This way, system-level analysis is performed in one software and interaction of members with each other, under both seismic and fire events, is then considered together. The current constitutive material model for steel at elevated temperature does not properly capture behavior in fire following earthquake scenario.
    [Show full text]
  • SEISMIC DESIGN RESPONSE by an ALTERNATIVE SRSS RULE By
    SEISMIC DESIGN RESPONSE BY AN ALTERNATIVE SRSS RULE by Mahendra Pw Singh and K. B. Mehta A Technical Report of the Research Supported by The National Science Foundation Under Grant No. PFR-8023978 Department of Engineering Science &Mechanics Virginia Polytechnic Institute &State University Blacksburg, VA 24061 March 1983 BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATA 11. Report No. ' SHEET VPI-E-83~12 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Da'te'" v ~iJ 0 SEISMIC DESIGN RESPONSE BY AN ALTERNATIVE SRSS RULE March 1983 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Rept. M. P. Singh and K. B. Mehta No. 9. Performinl! Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. Dept. of Engineering Science &Mechanics Virginia Polytechnic Institute &State Univ. 11. Contract/Grant No. 225 Norri s Hall Blacksburg, VA 24061 PFR-8023978 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report & Period Covered National Science Foundation Washington, D.C. 20550 14. 15. Supplementary r-.;otes 16. Abstracts The Square Root of the Sum of the Squares (SRSS) procedures are often used to obtain seismic design response. The design inputs for such procedures are usually defined in terms of psuedo velocity or acceleration response spectra. Erroneous results have been obtained with these existing SRSS procedures, especially in the calculation of response where high frequency effects dominate. Here an alternative SRSS pro­ cedure is developed using the so-called mode acceleration approach of structural dynamics. The design input in this procedure is defined in terms of, though, pri­ marily relative acceleration spectra but also relative velocity spectra. The rela­ tive spectra can be related to psuedo spectra.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Analysis of Industrial Structure Using Bracings and Dampers
    International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering (IJRTE) ISSN: 2277-3878, Volume-7, Issue-6C2, April 2019 Seismic Analysis of Industrial Structure Using Bracings and Dampers B. Ravali, P. Poluraju Abstract: Resistance of structures against earthquake plays an shear, lateral displacement). Dampers are more economical extensive role in construction industry. A structure should consist than bracings [1]. Aspect ratio plays a vital role in of strength, stability and ductility to accommodate both performance of structure. As aspect ratio increases, there horizontal and vertical loadings. Horizontal loading leads to the will be reduction in base shear carrying capacity and roof production of sway and further results in vibration and storey drift. Strength and stiffness are two major keys for any structure displacement of steel frame with aspect ratio 1 [2]. Arranged to resist gravity and lateral loads. Provision of bracings or bracings to the structure should be of buckling resistant. dampers to any structure contributes to lateral stability. After Buckling restrained frames with special concentric bracings assigning dampers or bracings, the general system changes to have effective performance than moment resisting and lateral load resisting system (LLRS). However, this involves high conventional frames [3]. economy, it is only suitable for high rise, important buildings Based on the arrangement of bracing, there are concentric which are suspected to be affected by lateral load and structures damaged by lateral load. The present work involves in proposing and eccentric bracings. Concentric bracing system is the suitability of type of damper or bracing for controlling the effective in reducing storey displacement, storey drift, and seismic activity on industrial structures in respective seismic base shear than without bracing system [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 – Bridges
    Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 – Bridges PUBLICATION NO. FHWA-HRT-06-032 JANUARY 2006 Research, Development, and Technology Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101-2296 Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HRT-06-032 N/A N/A 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date SEISMIC RETROFITTING MANUAL FOR HIGHWAY January 2006 STRUCTURES: PART 1 – BRIDGES 6. Performing Organization Code N/A 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Ian Buckle, Ian Friedland, John Mander, Geoffrey Martin, Richard Nutt and Maurice Power 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research N/A University at Buffalo, State University of New York 11. Contract or Grant No. Red Jacket Quadrangle DTFH61-92-C-00106 Buffalo, NY 14261 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Office of Infrastructure Research and Development Final Report Federal Highway Administration 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 6300 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101-2296 15. Supplementary Notes: Contracting Officer’s Technical Representatives: James Cooper, P.E., HRDI-03, Wen-huei (Phillip) Yen, Ph.D., P.E., HRDI-07, John D. O’Fallon, P.E., HRDI-07 16. Abstract This report is the first of a two-part publication entitled: Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1: Bridges Part 2: Retaining Structures, Slopes, Tunnels, Culverts and Roadways. Part 1 of this manual is based on previous Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) publications on this subject including Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Bridges, published in 1995 as report FHWA-RD-94-052.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural, Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering - Sashi Kunnath
    STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING AND GEOMECHANICS - Vol. I - Structural, Geotechnical and Earthquake Engineering - Sashi Kunnath STRUCTURAL, GEOTECHNICAL AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING Sashi Kunnath University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA Keywords: structural analysis; structural design; earthquake engineering; geotechnical engineering; seismic protection; structural engineering Contents 1. Introduction 2. Structural Engineering 2.1. Brief Historical Perspective of Structural Analysis and Engineering 2.2. Linear and Nonlinear Analysis of Structures 2.3 Structural Design 2.4 Emerging Developments in Structural Engineering 3. Geotechnical Engineering 3.1. Foundation Design 3.2. Modeling and Analysis 4. Earthquake Engineering 4.1. Seismic Resistant Design 4.2. Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering 5. Concluding Remarks Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary An overview of essential topics in structural and geotechnical engineering with particular focus on those related to earthquake engineering is presented. One of the objectives of this introductory chapter is to eventually provide readers with insights into seismic analysis and design. Beginning with a brief history of structural engineering, topics in structural analysis and design are reviewed. This is followed by a brief overview of geotechnical engineering with emphasis on foundation design and modeling for geotechnical applications. The final section focuses on earthquake engineering covering both structures and foundations and highlighting both traditional seismic design and innovative seismic protection. 1. Introduction The subject areas that encompass structural, geotechnical and earthquake engineering can all be regarded as topics within the broad field of civil engineering. While structural engineering focuses on the design of the visible part of a finished structure, geotechnical engineering is concerned with the design of the structural foundation below the soil surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Analysis and Retrofitting of an Existing Multi-Storey Building in Stockholm
    DEGREE PROJECT IN CONCRETE STRUCTURES, SECOND LEVEL STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN, JUNE 2018 Seismic analysis and retrofitting of an existing multi-storey building in Stockholm CELINE HAIKAL & MATILDA MUCA KTH ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 1 SCHOOL OF ARCHITECTURE AND THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT Seismic analysis and retrofitting of an existing multi-storey building in Stockholm Celine Haikal & Matilda Muca Master Degree Project Examiner Johan Silfwerbrand Supervisors Lamis Ahmed, KTH - Concrete Department Federico Pinna, Sweco - Structures AB KTH Royal Institute of Technology School of Architecture and the Built Environment Department of Concrete Structures SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden, June 2018 TRITA-ABE-MBT-18317 ISBN: 978-91-7729-882-3 Acknowledgments We would like to thank our supervisors Lamis Ahmed and Federico Pinna for their continuous support and appreciated guidance throughout this research. Special thanks to everyone who contributed in completing this work by giving us advice and assistance. Finally, we would like to express our deep gratitude to our parents and siblings for their unconditional encouragement and patience which inspired us to complete our research. Stockholm, June, 2018 Celine Haikal & Matilda Muca I Sammanfattning Jordbävningar är skakningar i marken som orsakar förluster av människors liv och leder till skador och kollaps av byggnader. Vanligtvis är de flesta byggnader som har allvarligt skadats eller kollapsat, äldre byggnader som inte längre uppfyller de uppdaterade byggreglerna för seismisk design. Syftet med detta examensarbete är att analysera och stärka en befintlig byggnad som har distribuerats av konsult företaget Sweco; lämpliga och innovativa seismisk eftermonteringsmetoder har använts för att förbättra byggnadens tillstånd med hjälp av insamlat vetenskapliga artiklar, tidskrifter och tidigare examensarbete samt svensk standard (Eurokod 8 - för dimensionering av bärverk med avseende på jordbävning).
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Analysis of Concrete Dam by Using Finite Element Method
    MATEC Web of Conferences 103, 02024 (2017) DOI: 10.1051/ matecconf/201710302024 ISCEE 2016 Seismic Analysis of Concrete Dam by Using Finite Element Method Ismail Rozaina1,2*, Kamsani Muhamad Hilfi2, and Mohd Nadzri Nur Insyirah2 1Institute for Infrastructure Engineering and Sustainable Management (IIESM), Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia 2Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450 Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia Abstract. This paper reports a brief study on linear seismic analysis of Sg. Kinta Concrete Dam. The analysis was conducted in order to determine the performance and behaviour of the dam under seismic excitation. The dam was modelled as two-dimensional and developed based on the design drawing that is obtained from Angkasa Consulting Services Sdn. Bhd. The seismic analysis of the dam is conducted using finite element analysis software package LUSAS 14.3 and the dam has been analyse as a plain stress problem with a linear consideration. A set of historic data, with E1 Centro earthquake acceleration of about 0.50g is used as an earthquake excitation. The natural frequency and mode shape up to fifth mode of the dam has been obtained from the analysis to show the differences of the stress and deformation between each mode. The maximum horizontal and vertical stress of Sg. Kinta dam was found and the distribution of them was discussed in form of contours. The deformation of the dam were also been discussed by comparing the maximum displacement for each mode shaped. 1 Introduction Dam is a structure that acts as a barrier to hold water or retain the water.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Analysis of Indoor Auditorium S.Dilipan Bose *, S
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 4, April-2014 1123 ISSN 2229-5518 Seismic Analysis of Indoor Auditorium S.Dilipan Bose *, S. Aravindan# *PG Student M.tech Structural Engineering, Bharath University. # Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, Bharath University. Abstract— The project titled “Seismic analysis of Indoor Auditorium” has been taken up with an objective to determine the seismic response and behaviour of an Auditorium constructed in Chennai area. Even though Chennai is considered as least prone to major earthquake, it is expected that a structure would survive major earthquakes without collapse that might occur unexpectedly during the life of the building. It should also be noted that after the Bhuj earthquake, Indian Standard IS: 1893 was revised and Chennai city was upgraded from zone II to zone III which leads to a substantial increase of the design ground motion parameters. Hence, this project presents an exploratory analysis of the seismic performance of multi-storey buildings system built in the specified area with a comparative study of the structures under past major earthquakes.Computer modeling is undertaken using Ansys is a multi-purpose software which enables to run and simulate tests or working conditions. It also helps in determining and improving weak points, computing by 3D simulations in virtual environment. Index Terms— Auditorium, Analysis, Ansys, Earthquake, Seismic, Finite Element Analysis, Static Analysis —————————— —————————— 1 INTRODUCTION n auditorium is a room built to enable the Stress analysis one of the engineering discipline helps in de- Aaudience to hear and watch performances at termining stress in materials and structures that are subjected venues such as theatres.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Design of Structures Using Base Isolation Qualitative Guidelines
    PBS8-235338 Project No. 86-246 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. March 1988 CONSULTANTS Report Seismic Design of National Science Foundation Structures Using Washington, D.C. Base Isolation Qualitative Guidelines IS RESPONSE NO ACCEPTABLE? YES EVALUATE (IS OUCnLlTY D[MAND f--------'--<: >----------1 COSTS ACCEPTABLE?) REFlNE ISOLAnON SYSTEM OR S1RUCruRE DESIGN REPRODUCED BY ns EYALUA IT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE COSTS NATIONAL TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICE SPRMFIELD. VA 22161 NO REPORT DOCUMENTATION 11. Jt£PO'"' MO. PAGE I NSF/ENG-88003 4. TItle aftCl SuMItIe L lIle....tt o.te Seismic Design of Structures Using Base Isolation, Qualitative March 1988 Guidelines Co 1.~&) L ~....i.. o..."iZat-. lItwpt. ..... N.R. Vaidya; E. Bazan-Zurita 86-246 Paul C. Rizzo Associates, Inc. 10 Duff Road, Suite 300 11. e-ntdfC) or GrantC(o) ..... Pittsburgh, PA 15235 (C) (ei) CE58615 240 U. 5ponw.on"C o..al\lZat~ H..... • ftC! Adcl..... Directorate for Engineering (ENG) National Science Foundation 1800 G Street~ N.W. Washington, DC 20550 J-----------------.---- -----_.-._-- 'Trie pv.y··pc(se C('f trlE' ·~"'·e~sc(,~...··t is tCi ',,"'e'l/ie\ll~ 'erie {:(ve'("iEtl1 c·c,·t$c:·e~d; c"f base :~ 50<,.:( 1 (:;('C ~i:. Cf')"'( ia',"jt::i to r.:, f,j ~~~'V ~~ :;, <:tp r:"C:'rit::'~:q! f:rt U iiit], f':"j~" i ,~; e,;,.,:i ii~ of' c:q'" d f,~~'t. fll.'·~"'·!n i 'rl '5. '(~Ej 't;. h f.~! applicability of b •••-isolated systems. The repc~~ dev.lops qualita~ive guideliY,es fc(~' selec~iYss base isolatio~ as a d'esigys =.
    [Show full text]
  • The Main Objectives of a Seismic Analysis Are to Evaluate Structural
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by LJMU Research Online A new damage index for plane steel frames exhibiting strength and stiffness degradation under seismic motion George S. Kamarisa, George D. Hatzigeorgioub,*, Dimitri E. Beskosa,c a Department of Civil Engineering, University of Patras, GR-26500 Patras, Greece. b Department of Environmental Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, GR-67100 Xanthi, Greece. c Office of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, Academy of Athens, 4 Soranou Efessiou, GR-11527 Athens, Greece. Abstract A new damage index for plane steel frames under earthquake ground motion is proposed. This index is defined at a section of a steel member and takes into account the interaction between the axial force N and bending moment M acting there. This interaction is defined by two curves in the N-M plane. The first curve is the limit between elastic and inelastic material behavior, where damage is zero, while the second one is the limit between inelastic behavior and complete failure, where damage is equal to one. The damage index is defined by assuming a linear variation of damage between the two abovementioned curves. Thus, for a given N-M combination at a member section, obtained with the aid of a two dimensional finite element program, one easily defines the damage index of that section. Material nonlinearities are taken into account by a stress-strain bilinear model including cyclic strength and stiffness degradation in the framework of lumped plasticity (plastic hinge model), while geometrical nonlinearities are modeled by including large deflection effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety, Earthquake Analyses and Design of Dams, May 2005
    Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety Earthquake Analyses and Design of Dams May 2005 Cover Photo Lower Van Norman Dam showing concrete dropping into the lake. A considerable amount of water had been emptied from the lake at the time. San Fernando, California, Earthquake, February 1971. Photo Credit: USGS. PREFACE In April 1977, President Carter issued a memorandum directing the review of federal dam safety activities by an ad hoc panel of recognized experts. In June 1979, the ad hoc interagency committee on dam safety (ICODS) issued its report, which contained the first guidelines for federal agency dam owners. The Federal Guidelines for Dam Safety (Guidelines) encourage strict safety standards in the practices and procedures employed by the federal agencies or required of dam owners regulated by the federal agencies. The Guidelines address management practices and procedures but do not attempt to establish technical standards. They provide the most complete and authoritative statement available of the desired management practices for promoting dam safety and the welfare of the public. To supplement the Guidelines, ICODS prepared and approved federal guidelines in the areas of emergency action planning; earthquake analysis and design of dams; selecting and accommodating inflow design floods for dams; and glossary of terms. These publications, based on the most current knowledge and experience available, provided authoritative statements on the state of the art for these important technical areas involving dam safety. In 1994, the ICODS Subcommittee to Review/Update Federal Guidelines began an update to these guidelines to meet the new dam safety challenges and to ensure consistency across agencies and users.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonlinear Structural Analysis for Seismic Design
    NIST GCR 10-917-5 NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Brief No. 4 Nonlinear Structural Analysis For Seismic Design A Guide for Practicing Engineers Gregory G. Deierlein Andrei M. Reinhorn Michael R. Willford NEHRP Seismic Design Technical Briefs NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program) Technical Andrei Reinhorn, Ph.D., S.E., is a professor at the University at Buffalo. Briefs are published by NIST, the National Institute of Standards and He has published two books and authored two computer platforms Technology, as aids to the efficient transfer of NEHRP and other (IDARC and 3D-BASIS) for nonlinear analysis of structures and for research into practice, thereby helping to reduce the nation’s losses base isolation systems. He has served as Director of the Structural from earthquakes. Engineering and Earthquake Engineering Laboratory at the University at Buffalo. National Institute of Standards and Technology Michael R. Willford, M.A., C.Eng. is a Principal of the global consulting The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is a federal firm Arup with 35 years experience of design of structures for buildings, technology agency within the U.S. Department of Commerce that civil, and offshore projects in many parts of the world. A specialist in promotes U.S. innovation and industrial competitiveness by advancing structural dynamics, he is leader of Arup’s Advanced Technology and measurement science, standards, and technology in ways that enhance Research practice, specializing in the development and application of economic security and improve our quality of life. It is the lead agency innovative design techniques using performance-based methods. of the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP).
    [Show full text]