DOCSLIB.ORG

Beyond Brexit: Trade in Services

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Beyond Brexit: Trade in Services HOUSE OF LORDS European Union Committee 23rd Report of Session 2019–21 Beyond Brexit: trade in services Ordered to be printed 16 March 2021 and published 24 March 2021 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords HL Paper 248 The European Union Committee The European Union Select Committee and its four Sub-Committees are appointed each session to consider EU documents and draft laws; to consider other matters relating to the UK’s relationship with the EU, including the implementation of the UK/EU Withdrawal Agreement, and the Government’s conduct of negotiations on the United Kingdom’s future relationship with the European Union; and to consider matters relating to the negotiation and conclusion of international agreements generally. The four Sub-Committees are as follows: EU Environment Sub-Committee EU Goods Sub-Committee EU Security and Justice Sub-Committee EU Services Sub-Committee Membership The Members of the European Union Select Committee are: Baroness Brown of Cambridge Lord Kerr of Kinlochard Lord Ricketts Baroness Couttie Earl of Kinnoull (Chair) Lord Sharkey Baroness Donaghy Lord Lamont of Lerwick Lord Teverson Lord Faulkner of Worcester Baroness Neville-Rolfe Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd Lord Goldsmith Lord Oates Baroness Verma Baroness Hamwee Baroness Primarolo Lord Wood of Anfield The Members of the EU Services Sub-Committee, which conducted this inquiry, are: Lord Bruce of Bennachie Lord McNally Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd Baroness Couttie Baroness Neville-Rolfe Viscount Trenchard Lord Davies of Stamford Baroness Prashar Lord Vaux of Harrowden Baroness Donaghy (Chair) Lord Sharkey Further information Publications, press notices, details of membership, forthcoming meetings and other information is available at http://www.parliament.uk/hleu. General information about the House of Lords and its Committees is available at http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords. Sub-Committee staff The staff of the Sub-Committee are Dee Goddard (Clerk), Jack Mitchell (Policy Analyst), Dominic Walsh (Policy Analyst), and Hadia Garwell (Committee Assistant). Contact details Contact details for individual Sub-Committees are given on the website. General correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the European Union Committee, Committee Office, House of Lords, London, SW1A 0PW. Telephone 020 7219 5791. Email [email protected]. Twitter You can follow the Committee on Twitter: @LordsEUCom. CONTENTS Page Summary 3 Chapter 1: UK-EU trade in services 5 Our inquiry 5 UK-EU trade in services 6 Figure 1: UK top five global goods and services exports 7 Chapter 2: Financial services 9 The TCA and the end of the transition period 9 Loss of passporting rights 10 Business preparedness 11 Relocation of financial services activity 11 Framework for cooperation 12 Equivalence 14 Equivalence for UK central counterparties 14 EU reluctance to grant equivalence 15 Limitations of equivalence 16 Future divergence 16 Reforming the equivalence framework 17 Divergence, competitiveness and standards 18 The future regulatory landscape and parliamentary oversight 19 UK influence in setting standards 20 Chapter 3: Professional and business services 21 Professional and business services in the UK 21 Box 1: Services trade and the World Trade Organization (WTO) 22 Professional and business services in the TCA 22 Market access and national reservations 23 Impact of national reservations on different sectors 25 Case study: legal services 26 Mobility 27 Provisions in the TCA 27 Box 2: Types of business visitor 28 Business mobility and COVID-19 30 Local presence and cross-border supply 31 Provisions in the TCA 31 Mutual recognition of professional qualifications 32 Provisions in the TCA 32 Framework for future recognition of qualifications in the TCA 33 Government support 34 Equivalence decisions 35 Divergence and opportunities 36 Governance and engagement 37 Chapter 4: Data and digital trade 39 Data adequacy 39 Importance of data adequacy 40 Long-term picture 41 Digital Trade 41 Digital trade chapter of the TCA 41 Looking forward 42 Chapter 5: Creative industries 44 Creative industries in the UK 44 Mobility for creative professionals 45 Importance of mobility 45 Movement of professionals 46 Movement of goods 47 Potential mitigations 48 Creative Europe 50 Intellectual property 51 Exhaustion 51 Audio-visual sector 51 Managing regulatory divergence 52 Chapter 6: Research and education 54 The UK’s research and education sector 54 Research funding 54 Horizon Europe 54 Domestic research funding 56 Mobility 58 Erasmus+ 58 Turing scheme 59 Other mobility 62 Summary of conclusions and recommendations 63 Appendix 1: List of Members and declarations of interest 68 Appendix 2: List of witnesses 72 Appendix 3: Call for evidence 76 Evidence is published online at https://committees.parliament.uk/work/945/ future-ukeu-relations-trade-in-services/ and available for inspection at the Parliamentary Archives (020 7219 3074). Q in footnotes refers to a question in oral evidence. Beyond BreXIT: trade IN servIces 3 SUMMARY Services are central to the UK’s economy: service industries accounted for 80% of UK economic output in 2019.1 The UK exported £317 billion of services to the EU and imported £217 billion of services from the EU in 2019.2 The UK has consistently run a trade surplus in services; the surplus in global services trade was £83.4 billion in 2018.3 After four and a half years of uncertainty, the UK and EU agreed the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) on 24 December 2020. This was welcomed by the services sector, which would have suffered in a ‘no agreement’ scenario, but significant challenges remain and negotiations on the shape of the UK-EU relationship on trade in services will continue in the years to come. It is in both sides’ mutual interests to ensure there is a positive and cooperative relationship, to ensure that trade continues to flow, and that future challenges can be addressed. In this report, we consider the future UK-EU relationship on trade in services by looking at the key sectors in turn—financial services, professional and business services, data and digital trade, the creative industries, and research and education. We consider the crucial elements in the TCA affecting trade in services between the UK and the EU, as well as the areas where further agreement is required. We took evidence throughout January and February, so this is necessarily a first look and many of the TCA’s mobility provisions have not yet been tested because of COVID-19 mobility restrictions. We are sure that other opportunities and hurdles will come to light over time. Financial services The TCA does not include substantive provisions on financial services, and delays to key decisions about the future relationship, particularly on equivalence, mean that the sector is still in a period of uncertainty. We recognise that the UK and the EU will seek to change their regulatory regimes where it is in either Party’s interest, but call on the Government not to disregard the value of a close UK-EU relationship in financial services. A deep level of regulatory cooperation between the UK and EU will be in the interests of both sides to help manage future divergence. Parliament must consider how best to scrutinise the new powers of the regulators. More broadly, the UK should use its influence on the world stage to promote an outcomes-based approach to equivalence and maintain best practice. Professional and business services Professional and business services form an important part of the UK economy and are closely interlinked with other goods and services sectors. At first glance, the TCA offers substantial trade liberalisation for these services in comparison to World Trade Organisation (WTO) terms, but the proliferation of national reservations to the agreement means that UK service providers face a patchwork of complicated rules that vary by sector and Member State. This fragmentation 1 As Gross Value Added. House of Commons Library, Services industries: key economic indicators, Library Note 02786, 3 March 2021 2 House of Commons Library, Statistics on UK-EU trade, Library Note 7851, 10 November 2020 3 Office for National Statistics, ‘International trade in services, UK 2018’: https://www.ons.gov. uk/businessindustryandtrade/internationaltrade/bulletins/internationaltradeinservices/2018#the- total-uk-trade-in-services-surplus-increased-in-2018 [accessed 8 March 2021] 4 Beyond BreXIT: trade IN servIces is likely to hit small operators the hardest, and the Government should do all it can to support and offer guidance to these businesses. In particular, the lack of mutual recognition of professional qualifications in the TCA could have a serious impact on many sectors, so the Government and regulators should explore all options, including a side agreement to the TCA, to alleviate this issue. Data and digital trade The TCA offers unprecedented cooperation on digital trade compared with other EU FTAs, and it is expected that the EU’s draft data adequacy decision will be confirmed in the coming weeks. Both sides should work together to ensure that these positive developments can be maintained to keep pace with innovation in this sector. Creative industries The UK punches well above its weight in the creative industries: the sector was worth £100 billion in 2019. This sector has been hit hard by the COVID-19 pandemic and its recovery will depend to some extent on getting the relationship with the EU right. We are deeply concerned about the potential impact of mobility provisions in the TCA on the over two million people employed in the creative industries, which could make touring prohibitively bureaucratic and expensive. We call on the Government and EU to work together to remedy this situation before international travel resumes. Research and education The research and education sector welcomes the Government’s decision to associate to the Horizon Europe programme, which will enable UK researchers to continue to participate in cutting-edge collaborative research.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Unrecorded Cross-Border Trade Between Tanzania and Her Neighbors Implications for Food Security
    SD Publication Series Office of Sustainable Development Bureau for Africa Unrecorded Cross-Border Trade Between Tanzania and Her Neighbors Implications for Food Security C. Ackello-Ogutu P. N. Echessah TechnoServe Inc. Technical Paper No. 89 September 1998 This publication is part of the Regional Trade Agenda Series USAID / Africa Bureau Office of Sustainable Development Productive Sector Growth and Environment Division Food Security and Productivity Unit and Regional Economic Development Support Office Eastern and Southern Africa, Office of Agriculture and Natural Resources Activity Title Regional Trade and Comparative Advantage in Eastern and Southern Africa: Implications for Food Security The series includes the following publications: n TradeNet: User’s Guide to InterMail n Comparative Analysis of Economic Reform and Structural Adjustment Programs in East Africa: With Emphasis on Trade Policies n Comparative Analysis of Economic Reform and Structural Adjustment Programs in East Africa: With Emphasis on Trade Policies—ANNEX n Comparative Transportation Cost Analysis in East Africa: Executive Summary n Comparative Transportation Cost Analysis in East Africa: Final Report n Comparative Analysis of Structural Adjustment Policies in Southern Africa: With Emphasis on Agriculture and Trade n Comparative Cost of Production Analysis in East Africa: Implications for Competitiveness and Comparative Advantage n Methodologies for Estimating Informal Cross-Border Trade in Eastern and Southern Africa n Reported Trade in East and Southern Africa:
    [Show full text]
  • Government Response to the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee Report HC 109-1 of Session 2013-14 Reforming the Scrutiny System in the House of Commons
    Government Response to the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee Report HC 109-1 of Session 2013-14 Reforming the Scrutiny System in the House of Commons Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty July 2014 Cm 8914 Government Response to the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee Report HC 109-1 of Session 2013-14 Reforming the Scrutiny System in the House of Commons Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs by Command of Her Majesty July 2014 Cm 8914 © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v.2. To view this licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/2/ or email [email protected] Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications. Any enquiries regarding this publication should be sent to us at [email protected]. Print ISBN 9781474109796 Web ISBN 9781474109802 Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. ID P002659226 42260 07/14 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum. Government Response to the House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee 24th Report HC 109-1 of Session 2013-14, Reforming the Scrutiny System in the House of Commons The Government welcomes the European Scrutiny Committee’s Inquiry into Reforming the Scrutiny System in the House of Commons and the detailed consideration the Committee has given this important issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Shopping for Christmas 2016: Retail Prospects
    Shopping for Christmas 2016: Retail Prospects ~ A Research Report for VoucherCodes.co.uk, part of RetailMeNot Report Prepared by Centre for Retail Research Limited, Nottingham September 2016 Research Report Shopping for Christmas 2016 Shopping for Christmas 2016: Retail Prospects ~ A Research Report for VoucherCodes.co.uk, part of RetailMeNot Executive Brief Report. This independent report into the prospects for Holiday or Christmas shopping in 2016 has been commissioned by RetailMeNot, the world’s leading marketplace of digital offers, and carried out by the Centre for Retail Research based in Nottingham, England. Spending on shopping by consumers in the final weeks before Christmas is vital to most retailers’ profitability and many achieve 20% or more of their annual sales in this period. This is only so because, irrespective of background, the Holiday festivities, including celebrations and gift-giving, are an important and traditional part of social and family life. Shopping for Christmas 2016, considers the Holiday/Christmas prospects for retailers and consumers in nine important countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain, UK, the U.S.A. and Canada. Their combined populations are 699.2 million. We estimate that Christmas spending this year will be: £280.991 bn (€323.895 bn) in Europe; £492.246 bn ($635.96 bn) in the U.S.; and £38.470 bn ($49.84 bn) in Canada. The 2016 report has taken account of major shifts in exchange rates and both the 2015 and the 2016 figures are based on current rates of exchange. This is to ensure that changes given in the report reflect only changes in the retail sector, and not currency movements.
    [Show full text]
  • Econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Bode, Eckhardt; Krieger-Boden, Christiane; Lammers, Konrad Research Report — Digitized Version Cross-border activities, taxation and the European single market Kieler Sonderpublikationen Provided in Cooperation with: Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW) Suggested Citation: Bode, Eckhardt; Krieger-Boden, Christiane; Lammers, Konrad (1994) : Cross-border activities, taxation and the European single market, Kieler Sonderpublikationen, ISBN 3-89456-075-4, Institut für Weltwirtschaft (IfW), Kiel This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/799 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the U.S./Canada Customs Clearance Process Understanding the U.S./Canada Customs Clearance Process
    Understanding the U.S./Canada Customs Clearance Process Understanding the U.S./Canada Customs Clearance Process Introduction One day in late 2012, vehicles attempting to enter Import requirements are also determined by which the United States via the Ambassador Bridge, which Canadian province is the shipment’s end destination. connects Detroit, Michigan, and Windsor, Ontario, were Each of Canada’s 10 provinces maintains its own tax faced with unexpected delays and electronic warnings to requirements, and several have very strict marketing avoid the bridge altogether. The reason? Canada Border and labeling codes (in addition to federal marketing and Services Agency (CBSA) agents on the Ontario side of labeling requirements). In Quebec, for example, which the bridge, North America’s busiest border crossing, lists French as its primary language, explicit mandates were staging a work slowdown as a way to express are imposed for the use of French on all packaging, displeasure over a new requirement to wear name tags signage, instruction materials, and advertisements. while on duty. People are often surprised at the complexity of the U.S./ Although the job action lasted for less than a day, and Canada trade process and underestimate the resources is certainly not an everyday occurrence, it is indicative necessary to ensure full compliance. Many businesses of the many factors at play in the world of cross-border mistakenly assume that given the closeness of the two trade. Whether you are bringing products into the U.S. nations—shared border, shared language, common from Canada or sending shipments to your Canadian values—that cross-border shipments must be a breeze.
    [Show full text]
  • Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States
    The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and Relations with the United States Updated April 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33105 SUMMARY RL33105 The United Kingdom: Background, Brexit, and April 16, 2021 Relations with the United States Derek E. Mix Many U.S. officials and Members of Congress view the United Kingdom (UK) as the United Specialist in European States’ closest and most reliable ally. This perception stems from a combination of factors, Affairs including a sense of shared history, values, and culture; a large and mutually beneficial economic relationship; and extensive cooperation on foreign policy and security issues. The UK’s January 2020 withdrawal from the European Union (EU), often referred to as Brexit, is likely to change its international role and outlook in ways that affect U.S.-UK relations. Conservative Party Leads UK Government The government of the UK is led by Prime Minister Boris Johnson of the Conservative Party. Brexit has dominated UK domestic politics since the 2016 referendum on whether to leave the EU. In an early election held in December 2019—called in order to break a political deadlock over how and when the UK would exit the EU—the Conservative Party secured a sizeable parliamentary majority, winning 365 seats in the 650-seat House of Commons. The election results paved the way for Parliament’s approval of a withdrawal agreement negotiated between Johnson’s government and the EU. UK Is Out of the EU, Concludes Trade and Cooperation Agreement On January 31, 2020, the UK’s 47-year EU membership came to an end.
    [Show full text]
  • Triangle of Partnership Or Conflicts
    International Journal of Political Science (IJPS) Volume 4, Issue 4, 2018, PP 34-41 ISSN 2454-9452 http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-9452.0404006 www.arcjournals.org Turkey in Relation to EU and Russia - Triangle of Partnership or Conflicts Bulent Acma1*, Mehmet Ali Ozcobanlar2 1Anadolu University, Department of Economics, Eskisehir/Turkey. 2Department of Management, University of Warsaw, Warsaw/Poland *Corresponding Author: Bulent Acma, Anadolu University, Department of Economics, Turkey Abstract: EU-Turkey-Russia. In this research, the relationship between European Union and Turkey, an age long neighbour to the continent and an associate member of European Union since 1963, are examined and analysed. Turkey is an important ally of the union and the only Muslim country-member of NATO from the very beginning of the treaty, since it joined the organization in 1952, at the same year that Greece did. The relations between the Union and Turkey are examined from the aspect of security. The reactions of the European Union to the recent political changes in Republic of Turkey, after the 15 July 2016 failed coup- attempt, are also examined. The EU - Turkey relations after the failed coup attempt and the international impact of it are studied from the perspective of political and social influence it might have. Russia is a vital energy supplier to the Union and Turkey is a geopolitical bridge between west and east, an energy corridor standing at the crossroad of important energy markets such as Iran, Iraq and Azerbaijan. The country has also relations with Cyprus, an upcoming gas supplier and an EU member.
    [Show full text]
  • Club Cultures Music, Media and Subcultural Capital SARAH THORNTON Polity
    Club Cultures Music, Media and Subcultural Capital SARAH THORNTON Polity 2 Copyright © Sarah Thornton 1995 The right of Sarah Thornton to be identified as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published in 1995 by Polity Press in association with Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Reprinted 1996, 1997, 2001 Transferred to digital print 2003 Editorial office: Polity Press 65 Bridge Street Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK Marketing and production: Blackwell Publishers Ltd 108 Cowley Road Oxford OX4 1JF, UK All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Except in the United States of America, this book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired out, or otherwise circulated without the publisher’s prior consent in any 3 form of binding or cover other than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being imposed on the subsequent purchaser. ISBN: 978-0-7456-6880-2 (Multi-user ebook) A CIP catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. Typeset in 10.5 on 12.5 pt Palatino by Best-set Typesetter Ltd, Hong Kong Printed and bound in Great Britain by Marston Lindsay Ross International
    [Show full text]
  • The Future Relationship Between the United Kingdom and the European Union
    THE FUTURE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE EUROPEAN UNION Cm 9593 THE FUTURE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE UNITED KINGDOM AND THE EUROPEAN UNION Presented to Parliament by the Prime Minister by Command of Her Majesty July 2018 Cm 9593 © Crown copyright 2018 Any enquiries regarding this publication This publication is licensed under the terms should be sent to us at of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except [email protected] where otherwise stated. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open- ISBN 978-1-5286-0701-8 government-licence/version/3 CCS0718050590-001 07/18 Where we have identified any third party copyright information you will need to obtain Printed on paper containing 75% recycled permission from the copyright holders fibre content minimum. concerned. Printed in the UK by the APS Group on This publication is available at behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s www.gov.uk/government/publications Stationery Office The future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union 1 Foreword by the Prime Minister In the referendum on 23 June 2016 – the largest ever democratic exercise in the United Kingdom – the British people voted to leave the European Union. And that is what we will do – leaving the Single Market and the Customs Union, ending free movement and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in this country, leaving the Common Agricultural Policy and the Common Fisheries Policy, and ending the days of sending vast sums of money to the EU every year. We will take back control of our money, laws, and borders, and begin a new exciting chapter in our nation’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Border Management to Facilitate Trade in SPECA: Challenges and Prospects
    Improving Border Management to Facilitate Trade in SPECA: Challenges and Prospects Improving Border Management to Facilitate Trade in SPECA: Challenges and Prospects 2 ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC Improving Border Management to Facilitate Trade in SPECA: Challenges and Prospects UNITED NATIONS 2010 Improving Border Management to Facilitate Trade in SPECA: Challenges and Prospects United Nations publication Copyright © United Nations 2009 All rights reserved Manufactured in Thailand ST/ESCAP/ 2574 For further information on this publication, please contact: Mr. Ravi Ratnayake Director Trade and Investment Division Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific United Nations Building Rajadamnern Nok Avenue Bangkok 10200, Thailand E-mail: [email protected] All material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is required, together with a copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint. The use of this publication for any commercial purpose, including resale, is prohibited unless permission is first obtained from the Trade and Investment Division, ESCAP, Bangkok. Requests for permission should state the purpose and the extent of reproduction. The opinions, figures and estimates set forth in the study are the responsibility of the authors and should not necessarily be considered as reflecting the views or carrying the endorsement of the United Nations. PREFACE An efficient and secured border management is vital for conducting cross-border trade in a smooth and cost-effective way. This is particularly true for the landlocked developing countries which are far away from seaports. Their traded goods usually need to cross a number of land borders before reaching seaports.
    [Show full text]
  • Infrastructure Quality, Cross-Border Connectivity, and Trade Costs
    ADBI Working Paper Series INFRASTRUCTURE QUALITY, CROSS-BORDER CONNECTIVITY, AND TRADE COSTS Elvira Kurmanalieva No. 1208 December 2020 Asian Development Bank Institute Elvira Kurmanalieva is a leading expert at the Eurasian Development Bank. The views expressed in this paper are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of ADBI, ADB, its Board of Directors, or the governments they represent. ADBI does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this paper and accepts no responsibility for any consequences of their use. Terminology used may not necessarily be consistent with ADB official terms. Working papers are subject to formal revision and correction before they are finalized and considered published. The Working Paper series is a continuation of the formerly named Discussion Paper series; the numbering of the papers continued without interruption or change. ADBI’s working papers reflect initial ideas on a topic and are posted online for discussion. Some working papers may develop into other forms of publication. The views that this paper expresses are the views of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Eurasian Development Bank, its Board of Directors, or the governments that they represent. The author would like to express thanks to Hozumi Morohosi for providing advice and helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. Suggested citation: Kurmanalieva, E. 2020. Infrastructure Quality, Cross-Border Connectivity, and Trade Costs. ADBI Working Paper 1208. Tokyo: Asian Development Bank Institute. Available: https://www.adb.org/publications/infrastructure-quality-cross-border-connectivity-trade-costs Please contact the authors for information about this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill Research Briefing
    National Assembly for Wales Senedd Research The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill Research Briefing January 2020 The Assembly and National Assembly for Wales The National Assembly for Wales is the Senedd Research democratically elected body that represents the interests of Wales and its people, makes laws for Wales, agrees Welsh taxes and holds The European Union the Welsh Government to account. (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill Research Briefing January 2020 Authors: Manon George, Aled Evans and Rhun Davies Paper overview: On 19 December 2019, the UK Government introduced the European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill. This research paper provides an overview of the Bill including the background to its introduction, key provisions, legislative consent and the UK Government’s impact assessment. An electronic copy of this document can be found on the National Assembly website: www.assembly.wales Copies of this document can also be obtained in accessible formats including Braille, large print, audio or hard copy from: National Assembly for Wales Cardiff Bay CF99 1NA Tel: 0300 200 6219 Email: [email protected] Twitter: @SeneddResearch Blog: SeneddResearch.blog LinkedIn: Senedd Research, National Assembly for Wales © National Assembly for Wales Commission Copyright 2020 The Assembly and The text of this document may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading or derogatory context. The material must be acknowledged as copyright of the National Assembly for Wales Commission and the title of the document specified. The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill: Research Briefing The European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill: Research Briefing 5.
    [Show full text]