DOCSLIB.ORG

The Vital Statistics of Peabody Buildings and Other Artisans' And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Vital Statistics of Peabody Buildings and Other Artisans' And The Vital Statistics of Peabody Buildings and other Artisans' and Labourers' Block Dwellings Author(s): Arthur Newsholme Source: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Vol. 54, No. 1 (Mar., 1891), pp. 70-111 Published by: Wiley for the Royal Statistical Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2979343 Accessed: 27-06-2016 12:45 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Royal Statistical Society, Wiley are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of the Royal Statistical Society This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:45:07 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 70 The VITAL STATISTICS of PEABODY BUILDINGS and other ARTISANS' and LABOURERS' BLOCK DWELLINGS. By ARTHUR NEWSHOLME, M.D. LOND., D.P.H., Medical Offcer of Health for Brighton. [Read before the Royal Statistical Society, 17th February, 1891. The President, FRIEDERIC JOHN MOUAT, M.D., F.R.C.S., LL.D., in the Chair.] CONTENTS: PAGE PAGE I.-Age and Sex Constitution VJII.-Tubercular Diseases . 82 of Population of Peabody IX. -Deaths from other Causes. 84 Buildings .73 X.-Density of Populatian .... 8' I.-Births acd Birth-Rates .... 76 XI.-Occupation of Tenants .... 89 III.-Mortalitv from all Causes . 77 XII.-Summnary ..................... 93 IV.-Male and Female Mortality 77 V.-Mortality at Different Ages 78 APPENDIX. VI.-Causes of Death ................ 79 Table A ............. , 94 VII.-Zymotic Diseases ................ 79 Financial Statement ............. 98 WHEN the President of the Royal Statistical Society honoured me by an invitation to contribute to its Proceedings, I ventured to say that I would read a paper on "the relation between density of " population and mortality." The views of the late Dr. Farr on this question have become accepted as almost axiomatic, and it appeared desirable that they should be revised in the light of more recent facts, and that the somewhat heterodox views I held ill relation to this matter should be subjected not only to the test of still further statistical examination than I had hitherto been able to make, but also to the criticism which their statement could not fail to elicit. With this object in view I proceeded to obtain the statistics of the Peabody Buildings as an extreme instance of a dense population, an instance which admittedly did not exist at the time when Dr. Farr first showed the close relationship then existing between density of population and mortality, and applied Farr's formula to them. The result I shall shortly give, with some reservations. But the subject opened out by an examination of the statistics of the Peabody Buildings and allied dwellings gradually expanded under my hands, and I was fortunate in obtaining statistics of such an elaborate and complete character, that I felt justified in devoting the whole of the time at my disposal to them, thus leaving the more general problem open for This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:45:07 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 1891.] NEWSHOLME-Vital Statistics of Peabody Buildings, 4-c. 71 future examination. In view of the importance of the problem of the housing of the poor, and of the efforts which are being steadily and increasingly made towards a solution of this problem, the experience acquired by the block dwellings already in existence, especially in regard to sickness and mortality, and the character of the prevailing diseases, may help to guide the action of public bodies and of private philanthropists in the future. The statistics I have been able to obtain relate only to three of the many companies or trusts now providing block dwellings for the labouring classes. Only these three appear to have kept records of births and deaths and causes of death. Even among these three I must place the Peabody Buildings in a different category to the dwellings of the Improved Industrial Dwellings' Company, and of the Metropolitan Association for Improving the Dwellings of the Industrious Classes. In the case of the Peabody Buildings the local registrars of births and deaths furnish quarterly returns for each Building, and in addition the deaths of inhabitants of the Peabody Buildings occurring in hospitals and infirmaries are included in the death returns. The task of obtaining the causes of hospital deaths has been undertaken for me by Mr. Crouch, the able secretary of the Peabody Trust, and his son, and I have to thank them for their courtesy and for the large amount of labour they have expended in furnishing me with various figures and returns. It was indispensable that the causes of hospital deaths should be included, and I am glad to say that the figures to be subsequently given are accurate and complete; but it will be easily understood that the task was so onerous as to preclude us from obtaining the data for more than the last three years. The death returns of the Metropolitan Association include the causes of death in the dwellings and in hospitals, but they are supplied on the authority of the superintendent of each Building, and cannot therefore be accepted as equally trustworthy with returns for which the local registrar of births and deaths is responsible. In addition, the populations of the dwellings of the Metropolitan Association and of the Improved Industrial Dwellings' Company are estimates, whereas that of the Peabody Buildings is annually enumerated, the age and sex of each person being ascertained. I have thought it right to put the Society into possession of the facts as to the extent to which my figures can be accepted, but at the same time I wish to take this opportunity to thank Mr. Moore and Mr. Butler, the secretaries of the two Yompanies named, for the courtesy with which they have placed all the information in their possession at my disposal. The population living in these three sets of dwellings is as follows: This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:45:07 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 72 NEWSHOLME-Vital Statistics of Peabody Buildings [Mar. Peabody Dwellings . ............................................ 2o,462 Dwellings of the Improved Industrial Dwellings' Company .... Z3,470 Metropolitan Association for Improving the 5,38 Dwellings of the Industrious Classes .................................... Total population (1890) ................ ........ 49,320 It may here be stated that although the last named company includes in its property not only twelve block buildings, but also two groups of cottages, I have excluded the population, births and deaths, of the cottages from my returns, in order to confine my statistics entirely to block dwellings. TABLE I.-Analysis of Population in each Peabody 0-5. 5-1O. 10-15. 1X-20. 20-25. Male. Feniale. Male. Fenmale. Male. Female. Male. Fe- Male. Fe- Bedfordbury. 38 42 49 45 39 45 32 M8 17 25 Bermondsey . .33 z8 23 29 15 i8 8 8 5 io Blackfriars Road ................ 105 io 92 83 52 73 63 45 35 i Chelsea .2 l 13 14 10 1o 10 7 5 6 Olerkenwell .82 78 72 68 54 6z 28 26 13 27 Great Wild Street .123 138 101 o20 62 8 i 64 43 32 48 Islington .................... 11 I+ 107 107 60 7 - 47 50 36 ; i Little Coram Street . 72 go 71 65 46 48 29 z6 18 26 Old Pye Street .90 92 64 84 55 39 32 i 8 29 33 Orchard Street .116 i r8 95 IOi 66 70 39 5o 36 58 'Pimlico .180 187 165 i;5 127 1 z7 99 Dz 70 75 Shadwell.6 5 8 43 39 35 39 20 *0 20 i 8 Southwark Street. 80 92 96 8 64 70 45 5 3 22 30 Spitalfields .14 [5 12 ,o 10 1 5 7 8 9 8 Stamford Street .76 II0 74 94 74 84 57 53 47 - Westminiter ........................ 43 36 48 34 38 47 25 Xo 15 I Whiteciapel .90 ii6 94 86 44 58 40 3 30 45 Whiteoras8 Street .328 340 323 293 260 240 167 165 110 "I1 Totals for all Peabody } 1,661 I,779 1,547 1,507 1,115 1,198 812 727 547 690 Buildings j 3,440 3,054 2,313 1,539 T,237 The next point to be ascertained is how this distribution of persons compares with that for England and Wales and for the whole of London. The result is shown approximately in Table If, which gives the number of persons, and of males and females out of a total of i,ooo persons, living at each age-group. The table shows that .there is a considerably higher proportion of persons under ten years of age than for England and Wales, and a still higher proportion at the same ages than for the whole of London. This content downloaded from 104.239.165.217 on Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:45:07 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 1891.] and other Artisans' and Labourers' Block Dwvellings. 73 I.-Age and Sex Constitution of Population of Peabody Buildings. The Peabody Trust take an annual census of the inhabitants of their dwellings, and by this means I have been able to ascertain exactly the age aud sex distribution of their population, thus obtaining an accurate and exact foundation on which to base the subsequent statistics.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical and Contemporary Archaeologies of Social Housing: Changing Experiences of the Modern and New, 1870 to Present
    Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Leicester by Emma Dwyer School of Archaeology and Ancient History University of Leicester 2014 Thesis abstract: Historical and contemporary archaeologies of social housing: changing experiences of the modern and new, 1870 to present Emma Dwyer This thesis has used building recording techniques, documentary research and oral history testimonies to explore how concepts of the modern and new between the 1870s and 1930s shaped the urban built environment, through the study of a particular kind of infrastructure that was developed to meet the needs of expanding cities at this time – social (or municipal) housing – and how social housing was perceived and experienced as a new kind of built environment, by planners, architects, local government and residents. This thesis also addressed how the concepts and priorities of the Victorian and Edwardian periods, and the decisions made by those in authority regarding the form of social housing, continue to shape the urban built environment and impact on the lived experience of social housing today. In order to address this, two research questions were devised: How can changing attitudes and responses to the nature of modern life between the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries be seen in the built environment, specifically in the form and use of social housing? Can contradictions between these earlier notions of the modern and new, and our own be seen in the responses of official authority and residents to the built environment? The research questions were applied to three case study areas, three housing estates constructed between 1910 and 1932 in Birmingham, London and Liverpool.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainable Districts ADEME1 Bedzed
    1. BedZed (Sutton - UK) Project description BedZED (Beddington Zero Energy Aerial view of BedZED, credit Bill Dunster Architect Development) is the UK's first and largest carbon-neutral eco-community and is located in Sutton, a residential town 40 minutes South East from London. BedZED consists of 82 residential homes with a mixture of tenures – 34 for outright sale, 23 for shared ownership, 10 for key workers and 15 at affordable rent for social housing – and 1'600 square metres of work space, an onsite shop, café, sport facilities, health centre and childcare facilities with a further 14 galleried apartments for outright sale. Residents have been living at BedZED since March 2002 and currently BedZed is home to 220 residents. The BedZED design concept was driven by the desire to create a net 'zero fossil energy development', one that will produce at least as much energy from renewable sources as it consumes. Only energy from renewable sources is used to meet the energy needs of BedZED the development is therefore a carbon neutral development - resulting in no net addition of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. Objectives The project aims and objectives are: • No use of fossil fuels • 50% reduction of the energies used for transport • 60% reduction of the domestic energy compared to the average British households • 90% reduction of the heating needs • Usage of renewable energies • 30% reduction of water consumption • Reduce waste and encourage recycling • Use construction materials from local providers (located whithin less than a 60 km radius) • Development of local resources (farmer network for local food) • Develop biodiversity in the natural areas Driving factors The main driving factor of the BedZed project was environmental .
    [Show full text]
  • GOOD NEIGHBOURS Housing Associations’ Role in Neighbourhood Governance
    GOOD NEIGHBOURS HOUSING ASSOCIATIONS’ ROLE IN NEIGHBOURHOOD GOVERNANCE niCOLA BACon, LIZ BARTLETT & Anne-MArie brADY Nicola Bacon Nicola is the Young Foundation’s Local Projects Director. She is responsible for the Foundation’s work on neighbourhoods and local innovation, which includes major initiatives on neighbourhoods and wellbeing. Liz Bartlett Liz is a Researcher in the Young Foundation’s Neighbourhoods and Local Innovation team. As well as her work on housing, Liz is also part of the team developing the Young Foundation’s work on wellbeing. Anne Marie Brady Anne Marie was an Associate at the Young Foundation until April 2007. She was responsible for managing the fieldwork for this report. Published by: CONTENTS 2 Foreword 6 Executive Summary 9 Introduction 11 The research 15 The findings 24 Implications for housing associations 29 The future? 30 Policy recommendations 35 Conclusions 36 Acknowledgments ‘Good Neighbours: The Role of Housing Associations in Neighbourhood Governance’ Summary report Copies of the full and summary reports are available at youngfoundation.org Publishing Information ISBN: 978-1-90551-04-0 Researched and written by Nicola Bacon, Liz Bartlett and Anne Marie Brady. Published by the Young Foundation, 2007 Copyright © 2007 The Young Foundation and The Housing Corporation, all rights reserved. Price £10 Further copies may be obtained from: The Young Foundation, 18 Victoria Park Square, Bethnal Green, London, E2 9PF Tel: 0208 980 6263 Online: youngfoundation.org Please note This report reflects the views of the authors only, and does not represent the views of either the members of the virtual advisory group or the Housing Corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • Our List of Registered Providers and Local Authorities
    Nationwide public sector eligibility list The public sector bodies to whom the use of this framework agreement is open, include without limitation: 1. Central government departments & their executive agencies: a list of such departments and executive agencies can be found at http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/government-business/government-ministers- responsibilities.aspx 2. Non-departmental public bodies (NDPBs): a list of NDPBs can be found at annex A to the Public Bodies Directory 2007 published by the Cabinet Office) which can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/506070/An nex_-_Public_Bodies_Reform_Programme_Update_16_Dec_2015.pdf 3. All Local Authorities, (as defined in Regulation 3(2) to 3(5) inclusive of the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2006 (as amended by the Public Contracts Regulations 2015)) and all and any subsidiaries and joint-venture vehicles of those local authorities, including, but not limited to, all listed on this website: https://www.lgbce.org.uk/records- and-resources/local-authorities-in-england 4. All National Health Service (NHS) bodies, including, but not limited to, NHS Trusts as defined in the Regulation 2 of the Public Contract Regulations 2015 which, in turn, includes: 4.1. Acute trusts; 4.2. Trusts operating community hospitals and the provider functions of primary care trusts; 4.3. Primary care trusts; 4.4. Care trusts; 4.5. Care trusts plus; 4.6. Ambulance trusts; 4.7. Mental health trusts; 4.8. Strategic health authorities; 4.9. Special health authorities; 4.10. Community health councils; 4.11. Local health boards; 4.12. NHS foundation trusts; 4.13.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 5 2 1 3 7 9 8Q Y T U R E W I O G J H K F D S
    i s 8 7q a 3 CITY 5 e TOWER HAMLETS k p 4 1 u rf 6w y 2 9 g j t do h RADICAL HOUSING LOCATIONS Virtual Radical Housing Tour for Open House Hope you enjoyed the virtual tour. Here’s a list of the sites we visited on the tour with some hopefully useful info. Please see the map on the website https://www.londonsights.org.uk/ and https://www.morehousing.co.uk/ ENJOY… No Site Year Address Borough Built VICTORIAN PHILANTHROPISTS Prince Albert’s Model Cottage 1851 Prince Consort Lodge, Lambeth Built for the Great Exhibition 1851 and moved here. Prince Albert = President of Society for Kennington Park, Improving the Condition of the Labouring Classes. Prototype for social housing schemes. Kennington Park Place, 4 self-contained flats with inside WCs. Now HQ for Trees for Cities charity. London SE11 4AS Lambeth’s former workhouse – now the Cinema Museum 1880s The Cinema Museum Lambeth Charlie Chaplin sent here 1896 with mother and brother. Masters Lodge. 2 Dugard Way, Prince's, See website for opening times http://www.cinemamuseum.org.uk/ London SE11 4TH Parnell House 1850 Streatham Street Camden Earliest example of social housing in London. Same architect (Henry Roberts) as Model Cottage in Fitzrovia, London stop 1. Now owned by Peabody housing association (HA). Grade 2 listed. WC1A 1JB George Peabody statue Royal Exchange Avenue, City of London George Peabody - an American financier & philanthropist. Founded Peabody Trust HA with a Cornhill, charitable donation of £500k. London EC3V 3NL First flats built by Peabody HA 1863 Commercial Street Tower Now in private ownership London E1 Hamlets Peabody’s Blackfriars Road estate 1871 Blackfriars Road Southwark More typical ‘Peabody’ design.
    [Show full text]
  • Affordable Housing Brochure
    Affordable Housing FCBStudios Affordable Housing 01 | Pioneering modular 02 | Medium Density 03 | Estate Regeneration 04 | Low density Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios LLP Twenty Carver’s Warehouse Studio 2 Tottenham Street 77 Dale Street 15a Calton Road London W1T 4RF Manchester M1 2HG Edinburgh United Kingdom United Kingdom EH8 8DL T +44 (0)20 7323 5737 T +44 (0)161 883 2544 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] +44 131 285 7370 Bath Brewery 5 Commercial Court Toll Bridge Road Belfast Bath BA1 7DE BT1 2NB United Kingdom United Kingdom T +44 (0)1225 852 545 T +44 (0)28 9099 2760 [email protected] [email protected] www.fcbstudios.com Great Eastern Quays Phase 2 Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios is an architectural and urban design practice with an international reputation for design quality, for pioneering environmental expertise and a progressive architectural approach. From large-scale urban design to the all-important incidental spaces in our buildings, architecture can have a positive impact on society and humanity. We create buildings and spaces that develop our culture and enhance our communities. It’s also a way of life for us and gives us a platform from which to engage in wider social issues from a cycling culture to a stance on creative education and an approach to heritage in the built environment. We started small 40 years ago and have grown to over 200 staff. We continue to be committed to social and humanistic values in our work and are proud to have won the RIBA Stirling Prize for Accordia, a scheme which is widely regarded as setting a new benchmark for housing in the UK.
    [Show full text]
  • Waltham Forest Choicehomes Lettings Area Bidding Closes 27 September 2020
    Waltham Forest ChoiceHomes Lettings Area Bidding closes 27 September 2020 VALLEY YORK HOUSE, CHASE GARDENS, HIGHAM HILL OATLAND RISE, WALTHAMSTOW, E17 Ref:213066 CHINGFORD, E4 8LD Ref:213065 6DG Landlord: Waltham Forest Landlord: Waltham Forest Type: Bedsit / studio Bedrooms:0 Type: Flat Bedrooms:0 Bedsizes: Bedsit/studio Level: 1st floor Bedsizes: Bedsit/studio Level: Ground floor Other: Suitable for a couple or single applicant. Central Other: Suitable for a couple or single applicant. Central heating. heating. RENT (including charges of £5.86) £75.21pw RENT (including charges of £6.63) £78.08pw CANN HALL FRED WIGG TOWER, MONTAGUE ROAD, WILLIAM ST ANDREWS COURT, HIGHAM HILL Ref:213064 LEYTONSTONE, E11 3EP Ref:213072 MORRIS ROAD, WALTHAMSTOW, E17 6AX Landlord: Waltham Forest Landlord: Waltham Forest Type: Bedsit / studio Bedrooms:0 Type: Flat Bedrooms:1 Bedsizes: Bedsit/studio Level: 1st floor Bedsizes: 1 double Level: Ground floor Other: Suitable for a couple or single applicant. Storage Other: Suitable for a couple or single applicant. Central heating. heating. RENT (including charges of £7.58) £76.81pw RENT (including charges of £6.38) £95.35pw HOE STREET ATTLEE TERRACE, PROSPECT HILL, HOE STREET HOWARD ROAD, WALTHAMSTOW, E17 Ref:213071 WALTHAMSTOW , E17 3EG Ref:213043 4SH Landlord: Waltham Forest Landlord: Peabody Trust Type: Flat Bedrooms:1 Type: Flat Bedrooms:1 Bedsizes: 1 double Level: Ground floor Bedsizes: 1 double Level: Ground floor Other: Suitable for a couple or single applicant. Central Other: Suitable for a couple or single applicant. Not heating. suitable for an applicant who has a child or who is pregnant. Central heating. RENT (including charges of £6.91) £100.88pw RENT (including charges of £3.23) £109.38pw HIGH STREET ESSEX CLOSE, WALTHAMSTOW, E17 6JS LEYTONSTONE HAWBRIDGE ROAD , LEYTONSTONE, E11 Ref:213056 Ref:212899 1DH Landlord: Waltham Forest Landlord: L&Q Type: Flat Bedrooms:1 Type: Flat Bedrooms:1 Bedsizes: 1 double Level: Ground floor Bedsizes: 1 double Level: Ground floor Other: Suitable for a couple or single applicant.
    [Show full text]
  • Trusted Partners
    Universal Credit Trusted Partners Originally published: 03 October 2016 Latest update: 23 January 2018 (version 3) Contents Trusted Partners Applying for an alternative payment arrangement Ongoing support for the claimant Trusted Partners Trusted Partners are registered social landlords (including stock owning Local Authorities) that have made an agreement with DWP. They have agreed to support their tenants, where possible with financial and personal budgeting issues. In exchange they are allowed to request alternative payment arrangements (APAs) for their tenants whenever they identify a need. DWP will implement them without challenge. The following organisations are Trusted Partners: A1 Housing Bassetlaw LTD A2Dominion Homes Limited Accent Foundation Limited Adactus Housing Association Limited Affinity Sutton Homes Limited Aldwyck Housing Group Limited Alliance Homes (also listed as NSAH (Alliance Homes) Ltd) Angus Council Aster Communities B3 Living Limited Babergh & Mid Suffolk Basildon District Council Birmingham City Council bpha Limited Bracknell Forest Homes Limited Broadacres Housing Association Limited Bromford Housing Association Limited Cadwyn Cardiff Community Housing Association Cardiff Council Catalyst Housing Limited Chesterfield Borough Council Coast and Country Housing Limited Coastline Housing Limited Community Gateway Association Limited Contour Homes Limited Cornwall Housing Ltd (known as Cornwall Council) Cottsway Housing Association Limited Cross Keys Homes Limited Curo Places Limited
    [Show full text]
  • The Making, Unmaking, and Remaking of Thamesmead
    The Bartlett Development Planning Unit DPU WORKING PAPER NO. 193 The making, unmaking, and remaking of Thamesmead. A story of urban design, decline, and renewal in postwar London Ariana Markowitz dpu Development Planning Unit DPU Working Papers are downloadable at: www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu/latest/ publications/dpu-papers If a hard copy is required, please contact the Development Planning Unit (DPU) at the address at the bottom of the page. Institutions, organisations and booksellers should supply a Purchase Order when ordering Working Papers. Where multiple copies are ordered, and the cost of postage and package is significant, the DPU may make a charge to cover costs. DPU Working Papers provide an outlet for researchers and professionals working in the fields of development, environment, urban and regional development, and planning. They report on work in progress, with the aim to disseminate ideas and initiate discussion. Comments and correspondence are welcomed by authors and should be sent to them, c/o The Editor, DPU Working Papers. Copyright of a DPU Working Paper lies with the author and there are no restrictions on it being published elsewhere in any version or form. DPU Working Papers are refereed by DPU academic staff and/or DPU Associates before selection for publication. Texts should be submitted to the DPU Working Papers' Editor Étienne von Bertrab. Graphics and layout: Luz Navarro, Giovanna Astolfo and Paola Fuentes Development Planning Unit | The Bartlett | University College London 34 Tavistock Square - London - WC1H 9EZ Tel: +44 (0)20 7679 1111 - Fax: +44 (0)20 7679 1112 - www.bartlett.ucl.ac.uk/dpu DPU WORKING PAPER NO.
    [Show full text]
  • On Site Units Recorded Between Jan-18 and Feb
    Start on Site units recorded between Jan-18 and Feb-18 wth 10 or more units Reference: FOI MGLA 130618-4761 Notes: [1] Figures are provisional pending the publication of the GLA official statistics in August 2018. [2] Supported housing schemes have been redacted from the list Project title borough Lead_Organisation_Name dev_org_name planning_permission_ref SoS approval Total start Social Rent Other London Shared Other TBC erence date on sites (and LAR at Affordable Living Rent Ownership Intermedia benchmark Rent te s) Redacted Lewisham One Housing Group Limited One Housing Group Limited 30/01/2018 34 0 34 0 0 0 0 Redacted Lewisham One Housing Group Limited One Housing Group Limited 30/01/2018 19 0 0 0 19 0 0 Redacted Lambeth Network Housing Group Limited Network Housing Group Limited 05/01/2018 40 0 40 0 0 0 0 Redacted Tower Hamlets Islington and Shoreditch Housing Association Limited Islington and Shoreditch Housing Association Limited 02/01/2018 35 0 35 0 0 0 0 Chobham Manor, Newham Newham London & Quadrant Housing (L&Q) 24/01/2018 163 0 75 0 88 0 0 County House - LLR Bromley Hyde Housing Association Limited 29/01/2018 76 0 0 76 0 0 0 Doncaster Drive Ealing London Borough of Ealing 31/01/2018 10 0 0 0 10 0 0 1 Station Square Haringey Newlon Housing Trust HGY/2016/3932 24/01/2018 117 0 0 0 117 0 0 Gallions Phase 1 Newham Notting Hill Housing Trust 14/00664/OUT 29/01/2018 165 4 38 50 73 0 0 Cannons Wharf Lewisham London & Quadrant Housing (L&Q) 30/01/2018 84 0 22 0 62 0 0 Royal Wharf Phase 4 Newham Notting Hill Housing Trust 15/00577/VAR
    [Show full text]
  • Map of Tras (Pdf 746KB)
    London Borough of Hammersmith & Fulham BUCKINGHAM BUCKINGHAMHIGH WENDOVER AVENUE SPEZIA RD STREET RUCKLIDGE MWS LEGHORN STATION RD ROAD ROAD MONSON RD WROTTE London Borough HARLESDENAVENUE RD CAPLE ROAD ROAD LUSHING- RD SLEYTON RD RD BUCHANAN RANELAGH RD ODESSA Council Housing TRAs & HARLEY RD RD GDNS of Brent ALL SOULS' RD INGALE AVE GDNS R O A D BATHURST FURNESS P A L E R M O ROAD HONEYWOOD NIGHT ROAD TUBBS ROAD CLIFTON ROAD RD PURVES VICTOR COLLEGE HAR ROAD FELIXTOWE ROAD ASHBURNHAM NAPIER RD ROAD RAVENSWORTH STATION Willesden ROW MS GREYHOUND ROAD GDNS PONSARD RD ROAD APP LETCHFORD ROAD Junction LETCHFORD BURROWS VALLIERE Resident Groups GDNS RD S RD CHG ROAD ST RIGELEY HARROW MORTIMER CREWE RD RIGELEY MS GDNS ST NHHG CHG PL HOLBERTON RD KENMONT Kensal Green GDNS WALDO TRENMAR HAZEL ROAD PLOUGH CLOSE SHA WAKEMAN RD KEY TO GAP SITES KEY TO TRAs STEPHENSON ALMA ROAD RAINHAM RD LANE PLACE KEY TO ESTATES GOODHALL Old Oak 1 1/8 Brooklyn Court W12 7JL North ATLAS CUMBERLANDSCRUBS PK Item Estate OAK Sidings ENTER 2 1/30 Linden Court W12 7JJ FORTUNEWAY 3 9/11/29/31/87/101 Macfarlane Road W12 7JY 1 White City Estate Gateway PRISE Hythe Road Ashcroft Square Residents Room Industrial Kensal Green OLD Trading Estate H Y T H E WAY 4 1/12 Clifton House W12 8NJ 4th Floor, 179 Ashcroft Square, W6 0YW 1 2 Edward Woods Estate Estate SALTER R D STREET St. Mary's 5 89/98 Godolphin Road W12 8JW 3 Clem Attlee Estate ROAD ST Cemetery GRAND 6 67 St Stevens Avenue W12 8JA Aspen Gardens Residents Hall 4 West Kensington Cemetery Aspen Gardens, London, W6 9JD
    [Show full text]
  • The Alternative Housing Awards
    The Alternative Housing Awards Landlord Categories 1. Overall Lousy Landlord: Hyde Housing Association Limited Has received over 220 nominations. primarily for shirking its social responsibility after claiming it cannot afford to run community centres despite revenue of £351m in 2016, a surplus of £95m, and CEO pay of £220k in 2016. Like many of the associations recognised by our awards, they could each appear in several categories. Hyde received several nominations for being bullying bosses, with senior managers accused of having created a culture of fear at the association. 2. Senseless Social Cleansing and Dodgy Development: Clarion Housing Group Numerous examples but probably one of the worst is Orchard Village in Havering, built with £31m of public money. This was a so-called “flagship” estate in the London borough of Havering whose residents describe it as a “living hell”. They have had to endure mould and damp, broken heating systems, inadequate fire-proofing and missing insulation. They have also been put at risk from high levels of toxic gas including methane and hydrogen sulphide. The association has now been forced to buy back the properties from the residents. But Affinity and Circle made surpluses of £145 million and almost £86 million respectively so they don’t care what the residents suffer. 3. Blundering Board and Management: Peabody Trust For dismantling the Community Based Housing Association in east London and transferring all the assets to the parent Peabody. This destroyed an association that had excellent tenant satisfaction across a whole range of aspects that far outstripped Peabody’s satisfaction rates. They dismantled the model that worked best and imposed the one that was weakest.
    [Show full text]