Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences ISSN: 1679-9283 [email protected] Universidade Estadual de Maringá Brasil

Santos, Michelle Daniele dos; Lima de Castro Lemos-Pita, Sandra Regina; Carvalho Brasil-Sato, Marilia de Metazoan parasite fauna of Pimelodus maculatus La Cépède, 1803 (Siluriformes, ) from the Guandu river, Rio de Janeiro State, Brazil Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, vol. 29, núm. 1, 2007, pp. 101-107 Universidade Estadual de Maringá .png, Brasil

Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=187115768014

How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Metazoan parasite fauna of Pimelodus maculatus La CépèdeCépède,, 1803 (((Siluriformes(SiluriformesSiluriformes,, PimelodidaePimelodidae)) from the Guandu riverriver,, Rio de Janeiro StateState,, Brazil

Michelle Daniele dos Santos 1, Sandra Regina Lima de Castro Lemos-Pita 2 and Marilia de Carvalho Brasil-Sato 3*

1Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências Veterinárias, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 2Prefeitura de Teresópolis, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. 3Departamento de Biologia , Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Km 7, BR 465, Cx. Postal 74539, 23851-970, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. *Author for correspondence, E-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT. Sixtyspecimensof Pimelodus maculatus fromtheGuanduRiverinRiodeJaneiro Statewereexaminedtodescribetheirparasitofauna,intheperiodfromAugust1999toFebruary 2001. Specimens of twelve metazoan parasite species were collected, allocated into seven taxonomicgroupsMonogenoidea: Demidospermus uncusvalidus GutiérrezandSuriano,1992, D. paravalenciennesi Gutiérrez and Suriano, 1992, D. majusculus Kritsky and Gutiérrez, 1998 and Scleroductus sp.;: Austrodiplostomum compactum (Lutz,1928);Eucestoda:Nomimoscolex sp.; Nematoda: Cucullanus pinnai Travassos,ArtigasandPereira,1928and Procamallanus sp.(young specimen); Hirudinea: Helobdella sp.; Myxozoa: Henneguya sp. and Myxobolus absonus Cellere, CordeiroandAdriano,2002,alongwithoneunidentifiedspeciesofAcanthocephala(cystacanth). There was a correlation between the host sex and the prevalence and abundance of D. paravalenciennesi .Themostdominantspeciesintheparasitecommunityof P. maculatus fromthe GuanduRiverwas D. uncusvalidus (50%),followedby C. pinnai (18,3%).Thisstudyisthefirst reportof D. majusculus andHenneguya sp.in P. maculatus, whileitexpandstheknowngeographic distributionof D. uncusvalidus , D. paravalenciennesi , D. majusculus , Scleroductus sp., Nomimoscolex sp., C. pinnai , Procamallanus sp., Helobdella sp., Henneguya sp.and M. absonus . Key words: Pimelodus maculatus , Demidospermus spp., Scleroductus sp., Henneguya sp., Myxobolus absonus , Guanduriver.

RESUMO. Fauna de parasitos metazoários de Pimelodus maculatus La Cépède, 1803 (Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) do rio Guandu, Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Sessentaespécimesde Pimelodus maculatus provenientesdorioGuandu,EstadodoRiode janeiro,foramexaminadosparaestudodesuaparasitofauna,noperíododeagostode1999a fevereiro de 2001. Foram coletados espécimes de doze espécies de parasitos metazoários alocados em sete grupos taxonômicos Monogenoidea: Demidospermus uncusvalidus GutiérrezandSuriano,1992, D. paravalenciennesi GutiérrezandSuriano,1992, D. majusculus KritskyandGutiérrez,1998e Scleroductus sp.;Digenea: Austrodiplostomum compactum (Lutz, 1928); Eucestoda: Nomimoscolex sp.; Nematoda: Cucullanus pinnai Travassos, Artigas and Pereira,1928e Procamallanus sp.(jovem);Hirudinea:Helobdella sp.;Myxozoa: Henneguya sp. e Myxobolus absonus Cellere, Cordeiro e Adriano, 2002, além de uma espécie de Acanthocephala(cistacanto)nãoidentificada.Houvecorrelaçãoentreosexodohospedeiro comaprevalênciaecomaabundânciade D. paravalenciennesi .Aespéciemaisdominantena comunidadeparasitáriade P. maculatus dorioGuandufoi D. uncusvalidus (50%),seguidade C. pinnai (18,3%). Demidospermus majusculus e Henneguya sp. constituem primeiro registro em P. maculatus . Demidospermus uncusvalidus , D. paravalenciennesi , D. majusculus , Scleroductus sp., Nomimoscolex sp., C. pinnai , Procamallanus sp., Helobdella sp., Henneguya sp.e M. absonus apresentamampliadasuadistribuiçãogeográficaconhecida. Palavras-chave: Pimelodus maculatus , Demidospermus spp., Scleroductus sp., Henneguya sp., Myxobolus absonus ,RioGuandu.

IntrIntroductionoduction is also found in Brazil and other South American The type locality of Pimelodus maculatus La countries.Itisa freshwater fishpopularlyknownas Cépède,1803istheRiodelaPlata,Argentina,andit “mandi”, “mandiamarelo” and “bagre pintado”,

ActaSci.Biol.Sci. Maringá,v.29,n.1,p.101107,2007 102 Santos et al. among other names (Fowler, 1951). It can reach 50 Robertson,1984and Gamispinus diabolicusThatcher cminlengthand2kginweight(IheringandWright, and Boeger, 1984; isopods of the Telotha 1935).Itisanimportantcommercialandgamefishin Schiodte and Meinert, 1884; hirudineae of the variousriversystems(Bonetto et al .,1963). genera Helobdella Blanchard, 1896 and Myzobdella In the Guandu River it is caught and eaten or Leidy, 1851, along with monogenoideans of the soldbylocalsubsistencefishermen.Anovuliparous genera Demidospermus Suriano, 1993; Vancleaveus fish spawns in the summer, from December to Kritsky,ThatcherandBoeger,1986 and Pavanelliela February, in successive layings (Godinho et al., pavanelli Kritsky and Boeger, 1998 (BrasilSato, 1977). Pimelodus maculatus is a bottom dweller, and 2003;BrasilSatoandPavanelli,2000;BrasilSatoet GneriandAngelescu (1951)include itasacarrier al .,2000). preparer organism, considering it to be a pre Among the endoparasites that have been found mineralizer in the material cycle of aquatic in P. maculatus fromtheSãoFranciscoRiverarethe environments. digeneticspecies C. platense , C. creptotrema , Plehniella Theparasitefaunaof P. maculatus insomeSouth coelomica Szidat, 1951, Prosthenhystera obesa (Diesing, American watersheds is relatively well known. 1850) and T. overstreeti ; metacercariae of the genera Gutiérrez and Martorelli (1999) reported Clinostomum Leidy, 1856 and Austrodiplostomum Demidospermus uncusvalidus Gutiérrez and Suriano, compactum (Lutz, 1928); cestodes species of M. 1992, D. armostus Kritsky and Gutiérrez, 1998, D. loyolai , Nomimoscolex sp.; plerocercoids of the order paravalenciennesi Gutiérrez and Suriano, 1992, D. Preoteocephalidea (BrasilSato, 2003; BrasilSato bidiverticulatum (Suriano and Incorvaia, 1995) and andPavanelli,2004). Scleroductus yuncensi Jara and Cone,1989in theRio Nematode larvae of the genera Contracaecum de La Plata, in Argentina. Gil de Pertierra (1995) RaillietandHenry,1912;Eustrongylides Jaegerskiold, described Nomimoscolex pimelodi inthissameriver. 1909; Hysterothylacium (Rudolphi, 1802) and adults In Brazil, in relation to ectoparasites, Cellere of Dichelyne Jaegerskiold,1902;Goezia Zeder,1800; et al. (2002) described Myxobolus absonus from the Philometra Costa , 1845; Cucullanus pinnai Travassos, Piracicaba River, São Paulo State. About Artigas and Pereira, 1928 and Spirocamallanus freitasi endoparasites, Kohn and Fróes (1986) reported Moreira, Oliveira and Costa, 1991 and the Creptotrema creptotrema Travassos,Artigasand Pereira, acanthocephala Neoechinorhynchus pimelodi BrasilSato 1928, Crepidostomum platense Szidat,1954and Parspina andPavanelli,1998werealsofoundin P. maculatus argentinensis (Szidat,1954)intheGuaíbaRiverestuary fromthissameriver(BrasilSato,2003;BrasilSato in the state of Rio Grande do Sul and Kohn et al . andPavanelli,1998and1999). (1990) reported Thometrema overstreeti (Brooks et al. , While studies have been conducted of the 1979)inthesameplace.PavanelliandMachadodos parasitefaunaof P. maculatus fromotherriverbasins, Santos (1992) described Monticellia loyolai in the there is no such previous analysis in the Guandu Paraná River. Also, Vicente and Pinto (1999) River,althoughtherearereportsofparasitesinsome compiled Cucullanus sp., C. pinnai pinnai Travassos, other fish species from this river. Padilha (1978) Artigas and Pereira, 1928 and Procamallanus described Zonocotyloides haroltravassosi in Curimata (Spirocamallanus ) sp. from Mogi Guaçú River, gilbert (Quoy and Gaimard, 1824); Nickol and Cachoeiras das Emas, in São Paulo State; C. debacoi Padilha (1979) reported Neoechinorhynchus Sarmento,FortesandHoffman,1995and C. fabregasi paraguayensis Machado,1959 in Geophagus brasiliensis Fortes, Hoffman and Sarmento, 1993 from Guaíba (Quoy and Gaimard, 1824); Kritsky et al. (1995) River, Rio Grande do Sul State, C. patoi Fortes, reported Scleroductus sp.inthesiluriforms Glanidium Hoffman and Sarmento, 1992 and C. riograndensis melanopterum MirandaRibeiro,1918, Parauchenipterus Fortes, Hoffman and Sarmento, 1992 from Guaíba striatulus Steindachner, 1876, Rhamdia quelen Quoy Lake, Rio Grande do Sul State; Dichelyne pimelodi and Gaimard, 1824 and a representative of Moravec, Kohn and Fernandes, 1997 from Itaipú Pimelodella EigenmannandEigenmann,1988. Reservoir,Paranáand Goezia spinulosa (Diesing,1839) Abdallah et al . (2004) reported Clinostomum fromParanáRiverParanáState. complanatum Rudolphi, 1814 and Procamallanus Recently ectoparasites have been recorded in P. (Spirocamallanus ) hilarii Vaz and Pereira, 1934 in maculatus from the São Francisco River, such as Astyanax bimaculatus (Linnaeus,1758)andin Astyanax copepods of the genera Ergasilus Nordmann, 1832; parahybae Eigenmann,1908and C. complanatum and Therodamas Kroyer, 1863; Vaigamus Thatcher and Polymorphus sp.in Oligosarcus hepsetus (Cuvier,1829);

ActaSci.Biol.Sci. Maringá,v.29,n.1,p.101107,2007 Metazoan parasite fauna of Pimelodus maculatus 103

Abdallah et al . (2005) found Diplostomum Student’s t test or the MannWhitney U test, were (Austrodiplostomum ) compactum Lutz, 1928, employedtoevaluatethepossibleinfluenceofhost Sphincterodiplostomum musculosum Dubois, 1936, Z. sex on the parasite abundance. The dominance of haroltravassosi ,thenematodes Cosmoxynemoides aguirrei each component of the parasite infracommunities Travassos, 1949, Travnema araujoi Fernandes, was determined by calculating the dominance CamposandArtigas,1983, Raphidascaris sp.andthe frequency, shared dominance frequency and mean hirudineae Placobdella sp. in Cyphocharax gilbert relative dominance, following the methodology of (QuoyandGaimard,1824). Rohde et al .(1995). In the present study, the parasite fauna of P. Ecological terminology used was that proposed maculatus from the Guandu River is described and by Bush et al . (1997). The statistical tests were analyzedinrelationtothepossibleinfluenceofsex appliedonlytotheparasitespecieswithprevalence and total length of the host, and the data are above10%,andthestatisticalsignificancelevelwas compared with those reported in other South p≤0.05(Zar,1996). Americanriversystems. Results Material and methods Components of the parasite community The P. maculatus specimens were collected from All the fish (100%) were parasited (95% by August 1999 to February 2001 from the Guandu ectoparasitesand90%byendoparasites)byatleastone River, in the municipality of Seropédica, Rio de species.Atotalof3106parasiteswerecollected,falling Janeiro State, Brazil, netted by local fishermen. Out intotheseventaxonomicgroupsfound,ofwhich2786 of the 60 fish collected, 24 were males, with total (89.7%)wereMonogenoidea,11(0.35%)Digenea,30 length of 24.05±2.05 cm (21.0 to 29.7 cm) and (0.97%)Eucestoda,265(8.53%)Nematoda,1(0.03%) weight of 144.6±47.3 g (80 to 270 g), and 36 were Acanthocephala and 13 (0.42%) Hirudinea, besides females, with total length of 27.3±3.6 cm (22.0 to cystsofMyxozoa(Table1). 35.0cm)andweightof246.2±115.3g(100to525g). The females were significantly larger ( t=4.06, Table 1. Prevalence, number (n), mean intensity, mean p=0.0001)andheavier( t=4.09, p=0.0001)thanthe abundance and place of infection/infestation of the metazoan males.ThefishweretakentotheFishParasitology parasites of Pimelodus maculatus LaCépède, 1803 of the Guandu River,RiodeJaneiroState,Brazil. Laboratory of the Institute of Biology of Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Parasitegroups Prevalence n Mean Mean Placeof (%) intensity abundance infection/infestation Seropédica,RiodeJaneiroState,wheretheirweight, Monogenoidea 95.00 2786 48.87 46.43 Gills lengthandsexwererecorded. Digenea 16.66 11 1.10 0.18 Eyes (metacercariae) Specimens of Monogenoidea, Digenea, Eucestoda 21.66 30 2.30 0.50 Gut Eucestoda, Nematoda, Acanthocephala, Hirudinea Nematoda 85.00 265 5.19 4.41 Gut Acanthocephala 1.66 1 1.00 0.01 Gut andMyxozoawerefixedandprocessedaccordingto (cystacanth) Eiras et al .(2000). Hirudinea 6.66 13 3.25 0.21 Gills Myxozoa(cysts) 13.33 9 1.12 0.15 Gillsand pharyngeal The statistical analyses applied to the parasite plates infrapopulationsfollowedZar(1996).Thedatawere found to be normal, allowing application of the statisticaltests.Student’s t testwasusedtoevaluate Monogenoidea and Nematoda were the most the total length and weight between the male and prevalent groups. Among the four species of female hosts. The Spearman’s rank correlation Monogenoidea, Demidospermus uncusvalidus wasmost prevalentandmostabundantaswell,followedby D. coefficient, rs, was used to assess the possible influence of total length of the fish on the parasite paravalenciennesi , D. majusculus and Scleroductus sp. abundance,andthePearson’scorrelationcoefficient, Among the Nematoda, Cucullanus pinnai was most r,wasusedtoanalyzethe prevalence(afterangular prevalentandmoreabundantthan Procamallanus sp. transformation of the data) in relation to the host (Table2). size,estimatedbySturges’formula. Demidospermus uncusvalidus was the dominant The loglikelihood ( G) test, with Yates species in the parasite community of P. maculatus correctionanda2x2contingencytablewasusedto from the Guandu River, followed by C. pinnai , D. assess the effect of host sex on the parasite paravalenciennesi , D. majusculus and Nomimoscolex sp. prevalence, along with the chisquare ( X2) test. (Table3).

ActaSci.Biol.Sci. Maringá,v.29,n.1,p.101107,2007 104 Santos et al.

Table 2. Prevalence, mean intensity, intensity and mean Table 5. Analysisoftheinfluenceofthesexandthetotallength abundance of the metazoan parasites of Pimelodus maculatus La of Pimelodus maculatus LaCépède,1803oftheGuanduRiver,Rio 2 Cépède,1803oftheGuanduRiver,RiodeJaneiroState,Brazil. deJaneiroState,ontheparasiteprevalence( x ; rs)andabundance (U/t; r),respectively. Parasitesspecies Prevalence Mean Intensity Mean intensity abundance 2 Parasitesspecies X r U/t rs Monogenoidea 2 X p r p U/t p rs p Demidospermus 76.66 34.58 1615 26.51 Demidospemus 0.062 0.803 0.719 0.068 536.5 0.116 0.155 0.237 uncusvalidus uncusvalidus Demidospermus 41.66 35.60 2248 14.83 Demidospermus 8.400 0.003* 0.210 0.651 592.0 0.014* 0.232 0.073 paravalenciennesi paravalenciennesi Demidospermus 21.66 19.46 269 4.21 Demidospermus 0.200 0.654 0.540 0.210 469.0 0.567 0.036 0.783 majusculus majusculus Scleroductus sp. 10.00 2.00 13 0.20 Scleroductus sp. 0.625 0.429 0.474 0.282 476.0 0.486 0.085 0.514 Digenea Austrodiplostomum 0.125 0.723 0.784 0.036* 459.5 0.669 0.197 0.131 Austrodiplostomum compactum 16.66 1.10 12 0.18 compactum (metacercariae) Nomimoscolex sp. 0.016 0.898 0.400 0.372 1.050 0.297 0.041 0.754 Eucestoda Cucullanuspinnai 0.441 0.506 0.724 0.065 0.327 0.744 0.108 0.410 Nomimoscolex sp. 21.66 2.30 17 0.50 Tests:Chisquare: X2;“ U” MannWhitney;Student’st: t;Spearman’srankcorrelation Nematoda coefficient: rs; Pearson’s correlation: r. Level of significance: p<0.05. (*) significant Cucullanus pinnai 85.00 5.17 119 4.40 values. Procamallanus sp.(young) 1.66 1.00 0.01 Acanthocephala Speciesnotidentified 1.66 1.00 0.01 Discussion (cystacanth) Hirudinea There was some qualitative similarity in the Helobdella sp. 6.66 3.25 16 0.21 Monogenoidea fauna found in the present study Myxozoa Henneguya sp. 5.00 with that reported by Gutiérrez and Martorelli Myxobulus absonus 8.33 (1999)andGutiérrez(2001)for P. maculatus and P. albicans, respectively, from the Rio de la Plata in Table 3. Frequencyofdominance,shareddominanceandmean Argentina.GutiérrezandMartorelli(1999)recorded relative dominance of the metazoan parasites of Pimelodus ahigherprevalenceof D. paravalenciennesi ,followed maculatus LaCépède,1803oftheGuanduRiver,RiodeJaneiro by D. uncusvalidus, andGutiérrez(2001)recordeda State,Brazil. higher prevalence of D. majusculus, followed by D. Parasites Frequencyof Shared Meanrelative bidiverticulatum .Inthepresentwork,thespecieswith dominance(%) dominance(%) dominance Demidospermus uncusvalidus 50 5 0.44±0.34 the highest prevalence value was D. uncusvalidus , Demidospermus paravalenciennesi 13.3 1.7 0.16±0.25 followedby D. paravalenciennesi . Demidospermus majusculus 10 1.7 0.10±0.24 Scleroductus sp. 0 0 0.006±0.02 IntheMonogenoideacommunityof P. maculatus Austrodiplostomum compactum 0 0 0.01±0.04 from the Rio de la Plata, the species of (metacercariae) Demidospermus were classified as central and Nomimoscolex sp. 1.7 0 0.03±0.08 Cucullanus pinnai 18.3 5 0.25±0.27 Scleroductus yuncensis as a secondary species (GutiérrezandMartorelli,1999),while D. majusculus and D. bidiverticulatum were central species and D. The Monogenoidea were more abundant in armostus , D. idolus KritskyandGutiérrez,1998and S. femalethaninmalehosts(Table4),althoughonly yuncensi were considered secondary species in the D. paravalenciennesi wassignificantlymoreprevalent parasite community of P. albicans from the same and abundant in P. maculatus females (Table 5). river(Gutiérrez,2001). Therewasnocorrelationbetweenthehostsizeand Inthepresentstudyaswell, D. uncusvalidus was abundance of parasite species. Only the prevalence considered a central species, while Scleroductus sp., of metacercariae of A. compactum presented a due to its lower prevalence, was considered a significant (negative) correlation with the host size satellite species. This is the first report of D. ranks(Table5). majusculus parasiting P. maculatus and the Guandu Table 4. Analysis of the influence of the sex of Pimelodus River represents a new location, expanding the maculatus LaCépède,1803oftheGuanduRiver,RiodeJaneiro knowngeographicdistributionofthisspecies. State,ontheparasiteprevalence( G)andabundance( U)andthe Kritsky et al. (1995) analyzed the morphometry totallengthofthesehostsontheparasiteabundance( rs). of specimens of Scleroductus Jara and Cone, 1989

Parasitesgroups G U rs fromfoursiluriformhostsfromtheGuanduRiver U p r p s and questioned whether the morphogical and size Monogenoidea 0.132 630 0.0029* 0.149 0.254 Digenea 0.122 459.5 0.6692 0.232 0.073 variations could be specific values or might be the Eucestoda 0.037 433 0.9937 0.041 0.754 result of host influences and/or environmental Nematoda 0.432 521 0.1812 0.121 0.356 Tests: G“loglikelihood”;“ U” MannWhitney;Spearman’srankcorrelationcoefficient: factors, and preferred not to relate them to S. rs.Levelofsignificance: p<0.05.(*)significantvalues. yuncensis or even to describe them as new species.

ActaSci.Biol.Sci. Maringá,v.29,n.1,p.101107,2007 Metazoan parasite fauna of Pimelodus maculatus 105

Scleroductus sp.expandsthelistofhostsforthisriver specificity of this parasite to pimelodids. Cucullanus (Âncorlength:69(6871);shank:46(4548);point: pinnai was the most prevalent species among the 32(3233)andbase:35(3537)). endoparasites, and was representative of the Althoughnoectoparasitespecieswasrecordedin nematodes, since only one young specimen of A. bimaculatus , A. parahybae and O. hepsetus by Procamallanus sp.wasfoundin P. maculatus fromthe Abdallah et al. (2004), the present study reinforces GuanduRiver. the ectoparasite richness in other fishes of the ThereisaonlyreportofanAcanthocephalain P. Guandu River. Hirudineae were found in P. maculatus fromtheSãoFranciscoRiver(BrasilSato maculatus and also in C. gilbert by Abdallah et al. and Pavanelli, 1998). Here, the only cystacanth (2005). Besides these, three more species of foundfixedtotheintestinalmucousof P. maculatus , Demidospermus andoneof Scleroductus werefoundin suggeststhatthisfishisaparatenichost. the present study, the latter of them already The presence of Helobdella sp. is also a first for encountered invariousSiluriformsbyKritsky et al. this parasite for the Guandu River. BrasilSato (1995). (2003) already recorded the hirudineae Myzobdella BrasilSato and Pavanelli (2004) reported a sp. and Helobdella sp. in P. maculatus from the São higherprevalenceof A. compactum in P. maculatus of Francisco River. Helobdella sp. presented low SãoFranciscoRiverthanintheParanáRiver.Inthe intensity and mean abundance levels. There are present study, these metacercariae presented low reports of glossiphonid predators of chironomids prevalence and adult Digenea were not found, in andassociatedwiththeminvariousplaces(Schlenz contrast to the results obtained by BrasilSato and and Takeda, 1993). Souza and Torres (1984) Pavanelli (2004), who registered, besides indicated that the preferred food source of P. metacercariae of Austrodiplostomum sp . and maculatus in the Três Marias Reservoir was Clinostomum sp.,fourdifferentspeciesofDigeneain chironomid larvae. Although there has been no P. maculatus from the São Francisco River and five studyanalyzingthefeedinghabitsofthisfishinthe fromtheParanáRiver. Guandu Basin, the results obtained here indicate The metacercariae of A. compactum found in P. thatthefeedinghabits/behaviorofthisspeciesmay maculatus from Guandu River presented low mean favorinfestation.AccordingtoPavanelli et al .(1999) abundance, a result similar to those obtained by the main concern regarding the hirudineae is that BrasilSato and Pavanelli (2004) in this pimelodid theyactasreservoirsofpathogens. from the São Francisco and Paraná rivers. Brasil Myxozoa were not found by BrasilSato (2003) Sato and Pavanelli (2004) observed a significant in P. maculatus fromtheSãoFranciscoRiver,while increaseintheprevalenceofthesemetacercariaein in this study, specimens of Henneguya sp. and largerhostscollectedfromtheSãoFranciscoRiver, Myxobolus absonus Cellere, Cordeiro and Adriano, while in the present study the metacercariae were 2002wereregistered.Cellere et al .(2002)described significantly more prevalent in smaller hosts. The M. absonus collectedfromtheopercularcavityof P. metacercariae of A. compactum found in the eyes of maculatus fromthePiracicabaRiver,SãoPauloState the P. maculatus specimens collected suggests the and recorded a low prevalence (8.33%) of this potentialof thisfishasan intermediatehost.More myxosporean species. Besides this, M. stokesi Pinto, studies need to be conducted in the fishes of 1928wasreportedin Pimelodella sp.inBrazil(Eiras et Guandu River Basin to detect the presence or al .,2005).TheGuanduRiverisanew locationfor absenceoftheintermediatehostsofthosedigenetic Henneguya sp. and M. absonus, and P. maculatus is a species already recorded for other river systems in newhostfor Henneguya sp. which P. maculatus isadefinitivehost. The study of the parasite fauna of P. maculatus Species of Nomimoscolex Woodland, 1934 have fromtheSãoFranciscoRiverbyBrasilSato(2003) already been reported in P. maculatus by various revealed parasite richness based on species of authors (Rego et al ., 1974; Brooks and Deardorff, Monogenoidea, Digenea and Copepoda, although 1980; Gil de Pertierra, 1995; BrasilSato, 2003) in Hirudinea, Eucestoda, Nematoda and adult otherriversystems.Theoccurrenceof Nomimoscolex Acanthocephala were also reported. The parasite sp. in P. maculatus in the Guandu River Basin fauna of P. maculatus from the Guandu River expandsitsknowngeographicdistribution. presented Monogenoidea (four species) and Thehighprevalenceof C. pinnai observedinthis Nematoda (two species) and absence of Crustacea study and the reports in fishes from other river andadultsofDigeneaandofAcanthocephala. systems(Hamann,1985; Vicente et al .,1985;Vicente Theseresultsestablishthattheinvertebratefauna and Pinto, 1999; BrasilSato, 2003) indicate some (intermediatehostsofDigeneaandAcanthocephala, ActaSci.Biol.Sci. Maringá,v.29,n.1,p.101107,2007 106 Santos et al. at least) seem to be suffering, probably due to the BRASILSATO, M.C.; PAVANELLI, G.C. Digenea de anthropicinterferencesthatcontinuallydegradethis Pimelodus maculatus (Osteichthyes,Pimelodidae)dasbacias riversystem(BizerrilandPrimo,2001).Despitethis dos rios São Francisco e Paraná, Brasil. Parasitol. Latin. , hostility, the force of coevolution still enables Santiago,v.59,n.34,p.123131,2004. Monogenoideafaunatoprevailin P. maculatus, albeit BRASILSATO, M.C. et al . Ocorrência e aspectos with less richness than reported in other river quantitativos de Gamispinus diabolicus (Copepoda: Ergasilidae) parasitando o mandimarelo, Pimelodus systems. maculatus (Siluroidei:Pimelodidae),noRioParaná,Brasil. Rev. Univ. Rural, Ciên. Vida , Seropédica, v. 22 (Supl.), AAAcknowledgementAcknowledgement p.6769,2000. Michelle D. dos Santos was supported by a BROOKS,D.R.;DEARDORFF,T.Threeproteocephalid cestodes from Colombian Siluriform fishes, including studentfellowshipfromCNPq(ConselhoNacional Nomimoscolex alovarius sp. n. (Monticeliidae: deDesenvolvimentoCientíficoeTecnológico). Zygobothriinae). Proc. Helminthol. Soc. Wash .,Washington, D.C.,v.47,p.1521,1980. RefeReferencesrences BUSH,A.O. et al.Parasitologymeetsecologyonitsown ABDALLAH, V.D. et al. Metazoários parasitos dos terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J. Parasitol ., Lawrence, lambaris Astyanax bimaculatus (Linnaeus, 1758), A. v.83,n.4,p.575583,1997. parahybae Eigenmann, 1908 e Oligosarcus hepsetus (Cuvier, CELLERE,E.F. et al.Myxobolus absonus sp.n.(Myxozoa: 1829)(Osteichthyes:Characidae),doRioGuandu,Estado Myxosporea) parasitizing Pimelodus maculatus do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet. , (Siluriformes:Pimelodidae),aSouthAmericanfreshwater Seropédica,v.13,n.2,p.5763,2004. fish. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ,RiodeJaneiro,v.97,n.1, ABDALLAH, V.D. et al. Ecologia da comunidade de p.7980,2002. metazoáriosparasitosdosairú Cyphocharax gilbert (Quoye EIRAS,J.C. et al.Métodos de Estudo e Técnicas Laboratoriais Gaimard, 1824) (Characiformes: Curimatidae) do Rio em Parasitologia de Peixes. Maringá:EditoradaUniversidade Guandu, Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. Rev. Bras. EstadualdeMaringá,2000. Parasitol. Vet. ,Seropédica,v.14,n.4,p.154159,2005. EIRAS, J.C. et al. Synopsys of the species of Myxobolus BIZERRIL, C.R.S.F; PRIMO, P.B. da S. Peixes de águas Bütschli, 1882 (Myxozoa: Myxosporea: Myxobolidae). interiores do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Syst. Parasitol., TheNetherlands,v.61,p.146,2005. FundaçãodeEstudosdoMar,2001. FOWLER,H.W. Os Peixes de Água Doce do Brasil. Vol.VI. BONETTO,A.A. et al .Ecologiaalimentariadel“amarillo” SãoPaulo:ArquivosdeZoologiadoEstadodeSãoPaulo, y“moncholo”, Pimelodus clarias (Bloch)y Pimelodus albicans 1951.p.405625. (Valenciennes) (Pisces, Pimelodidae). Physis , Buenos GIL DE PERTIERRA, A.A. Nomimoscolex miocroacetabula Aires,v.24,n.67,p.8794,1963. sp. n. y N. pimelodi sp. n. (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea) BRASILSATO,M.C.ParasitosdePeixesdaBaciadoSão parasitosdeSiluriformesdelRiodelaPlata. Neotrópica ,La Francisco. In : GODINHO, H.P.; GODINHO, A.L. Plata,v.41,n.105106,p.1925,1995. (Ed.). Águas, Peixes e Pescadores do São Francisco das Minas GNERI,F.S.;ANGELESCU,V.Lanutricióndelospeces Gerais .BeloHorizonte:Pucminas,2003.p.149165. iliófagos, en relación con el metabolismo general del BRASILSATO, M.C.; PAVANELLI, G.C. ambiente acuático. Commun. Mus. Arg. Cienc. Nat. Neoechinorhynchus pimelodi sp. n. (Eoacanthocephala, “Bernardino Rivadavia” , Ciências Zoológicas , Buenos Aires, Neoechinorhynchidae)parasitizing Pimelodus maculatus La v.2,n.1,p.144,1951. Cépède,“mandiamarelo”(Siluroidei,Pimelodidae)from GODINHO,H.M. et al.Fecundidadeetipodedesovado thebasinoftheSãoFranciscoRiver,TrêsMarias,Minas mandi Pimelodus maculatus Lacépède, 1803 (Pisces, Gerais, Brazil. Rev. Brasil. Zool. , Curitiba, v. 15, n. 4, Siluroidei). Rev. Brasil. Biol .,SãoCarlos,v.37,n.4,p.737 p.10031011,1998. 744,1977. BRASILSATO,M.C.;PAVANELLI,G.C.Ecologicaland GUTIERREZ, P.A; MARTORELLI, S.R. The structure reproductive aspects of Neoechinorhynchus pimelodi Brasil ofthemonogeneancommunityonthegillsof Pimelodus Sato and Pavanelli, 1997 (Eoacanthocephala: maculatus in Rio de La Plata (Argentina). Parasitol., Neoechinorhyncidae) of Pimelodus maculatus Lácèpede, Cambridge,v.119,n.2,p.183188,1999. 1803(Siluroidei:Pimelodidae)oftheSãoFranciscoRiver, GUTIÉRREZ, P.A. Monogenean community structure Brazil. Rev. Brasil. Zool. , Curitiba, v. 16, n. 1, p. 7382, on the gills of Pimelodus albicans from Río Plata 1999. (Argentina):acompartiveapproach. Parasitol.,Cambridge, BRASILSATO, M.C.; PAVANELLI, G.C. Pavanelliella v.122,p.465470,2001. pavanellii Kritsky and Boeger, 1998 (Monogenea: HAMANN, M.I. Presencia de Cucullanus pinnai Dactylogyridae)parasitodascavidadesnasaisde Pimelodus Travassos, Artigas and Pereira (1928) em peces del rio maculatus Lac., 1803, “mandi”, das bacias do rio São Paraná médio, Província de Corrientes, Republica FranciscoedorioParaná,Brasil. Parasitol. Dia ,Santiago, Argentina (Nematoda: Cucullanidae). Hist. Nat., v.24,p.123126,2000. Corrientes ,v.5,p.147148,1985.

ActaSci.Biol.Sci. Maringá,v.29,n.1,p.101107,2007 Metazoan parasite fauna of Pimelodus maculatus 107

IHERING,R.Von;WRIGHT,S.Fisheriesinvestigations REGO,A.A. et al.EstudosdecestóidesdepeixesdoBrasil. innortheastBrazil. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc., Bethesda, v.35, Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz ,RiodeJaneiro,v.72,p.187204, p.267271,1935. 1974. KOHN, A.; FRÓES, O.M. Saccocoelioides godoyi n. sp. ROHDE, K. et al. Aspects of the ecology of metazoan (Haploporidae) and other trematodes parasites of fishes ectoparasitesofmarinefishes. Int. J. Parasitol. ,Kidlington, from the Guaiba Estuary, RS, Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo v.25,n.8,p.945970,1995. Cruz ,RiodeJaneiro,v.81,n.1,p.6772,1986. SCHLENZ,E.;TAKEDA,A.M.Ocorrênciadehirudínea KOHN, A. et al. On the Brazilian species of halipegine (Rhynchobdelliformes, Glossiphoniidae) na planície de genera(:Derogenidae)fromfishes,withnew inundação do alto rio Paraná. Revista Unimar , Maringá, morphological data, hosts and synonyms. Syst. Parasitol., (Supl.),p.5363,1993. The Netherlands,v.16,p.201211,1990. SOUZA, M.R.F.; TORRES, G.E. Alimentação natural, KRITSKY, D.C. et al. Neotropical Monogenoidea. 22. especificidade alimentar e capacidade malacófaga de Variation in Scleroductus Species (Gyrodactylidea, Pimelodus maculatu s Lacépède, 1803 (Osteichthyes, Gyrodactylidae) from Siluriform Fishes of Southeastern Siluriformes, Pimelodidae) da represa de Três Marias, Brazil. J. Helminthol. Soc. Wash. ,Washington,D.C.,v.62, MG. In :ENCONTROANUALDEAQÜICULTURA n.1,p.5356,1995. DE MINAS GERAIS, 3., 1984. Belo Horizonte. Anais ... NICKOL, B.B.; PADILHA, T.N. Neoechinorhynchus Belo Horizonte: Assoc. Mineira de Aqüicultura, 1984. paraguayensis (Acanthocephala: Neoechinorhynchidae) from p.1618. Brazil. J. Parasitol .,Lawrence,v.65,n.6,p.987989,1979. VICENTE, J.J. et al. Nematóides do Brasil, 1ª parte: PADILHA,T.N.CaracterizaçãodafamíliaZonocotylidae NematóidesdePeixes. Atas Soc. Biol. Rio de Janeiro ,v.25, com redescrição de Zonocotyle bicaecata Travassos, 1948 e p.179,1985. descriçãodeumnovogênero(Trematoda,Digenea). Rev. VICENTE, J.J.; PINTO, R.M. Nematóides do Brasil. Bras. Biol. ,SãoCarlos,v.38,n.2,p.415429,1978. Nematóidesdepeixes.Atualização:19851998. Rev. Bras. PAVANELLI,G.C.;MACHADODOSSANTOS,M.H. Zool.,Curitiba,v.16,n.3,p.561610,1999. Goezeella agostinhoi sp. n. e Monticellia loyolai sp. n., ZAR,J.H. Biostatistical Analysis. UpperSaddleRiver.3.ed. cestóidesproteocefalideosparasitasdepeixespimelodídeos NewJersey:PrenticeHall,1996. do rio Paraná, Paraná, Brasil . Rev. Bras. Parasitol. Vet ., Seropédica,v.1,n.1,p.4550,1992. PAVANELLI, G.C. et al. Doenças de peixes: profilaxia, Received on June 22, 2006. diagnóstico e tratamento. Maringá: Editora da Universidade Accepted on June 23, 2007. EstadualdeMaringá,1999.

ActaSci.Biol.Sci. Maringá,v.29,n.1,p.101107,2007