Red Turpentine Beetle Donald R
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Black Turpentine Beetle and Its Role in Pine Mortality
Black Turpentine Beetle and Its Role in Pine Mortality The black turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus terebrans has been known to cause considerable damage to pines on Long Island. This small, black bark beetle (about 1/5 to 3/8-inch long) is capable of causing the death of apparently healthy pines. Infestations have been found on the Japanese black pine (Pinus thunbergii), pitch pine (Pinus rigida), Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris). There have been reports of turpentine beetles on other pine species and spruce species. This pest is normally a secondary invader that attacks only those hosts, which have been initially weakened or stressed by other agents. On Long Island it has assumed the role of a primary invader in what appear to be healthy Japanese black pines. Black turpentine beetle (BTB) has also been observed to be a primary invader on Japanese black pine on Cape Cod, Massachusetts. Fig. 1. Adult black turpentine beetle. (David LIFE HISTORY T. Almquist, University of Florida , www.Bugwood.org) The black turpentine beetle adult (Fig. 1) bores through the thick bark plates and phloem to the sapwood. The primary feeding site is the lower 6 feet of the main trunk, but boring has been seen in buttress roots also, where there was no obvious trunk injury. Injury to the trunk causes resin to flow, resulting in the formation of a pitch tube (Fig. 4, 5, & 6) as the resin hardens. An egg gallery is excavated on the inner face of the bark and scars, usually in a downward direction; and a row of eggs is deposited in this gallery. -
Disruptant Effects of 4-Allylanisole and Verbenone on Tomicus Piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Response to Baited Traps and Logs
The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 37 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2004 Numbers 3 & Article 4 4 - Fall/Winter 2004 October 2004 Disruptant Effects of 4-Allylanisole and Verbenone on Tomicus Piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Response to Baited Traps and Logs Robert A. Haack USDA Forest Service Robert K. Lawrence Missouri Department of Conservation Toby R. Petrice USDA Forest Service Therese M. Poland USDA Forest Service Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Haack, Robert A.; Lawrence, Robert K.; Petrice, Toby R.; and Poland, Therese M. 2004. "Disruptant Effects of 4-Allylanisole and Verbenone on Tomicus Piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Response to Baited Traps and Logs," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 37 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol37/iss2/4 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Haack et al.: Disruptant Effects of 4-Allylanisole and Verbenone on <i>Tomicus 2004 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 131 DISRUPTANT EFFECTS OF 4-ALLYLANISOLE AND VERBENONE ON TOMICUS PINIPERDA (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE) RESPONSE TO BAITED TRAPS AND LOGS Robert A. Haack1, Robert K. Lawrence2, Toby R. Petrice1, and Therese M. Poland1 ABSTRACT We assessed the inhibitory effects of the host compound 4-allylanisole (release rates = 1 and 2 mg/d in 1994, and 1 and 10 mg/d in 2001) on the response of the pine shoot beetle, Tomicus piniperda (L.), adults to funnel traps baited with the attractant host compound α-pinene (release rate = 150 mg/d) in two pine Christmas tree plantations in Michigan in spring 1994 and two other plantations in spring 2001. -
A Revision of the Bark Beetle Genus Dendroctonus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)
Great Basin Naturalist Volume 23 Number 1 – Number 2 Article 1 6-14-1963 A revision of the bark beetle genus Dendroctonus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) Stephen L. Wood Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Wood, Stephen L. (1963) "A revision of the bark beetle genus Dendroctonus Erichson (Coleoptera: Scolytidae)," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 23 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol23/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Y The Great Basin Naturalist Published at Provo, Utah by Brigham Young University Volume XXIII June 14, 1963 ' Jj'^^^^^ljS^ AUG 1 8 1966 hMrxvMrXLJ A REVISION OF THE BARK BEETLE GENUS ^ SIT DENDROCTONUS ERICHSON (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE)^ Stephen L. Wood' Abstract This taxonomic revision of all known species of Dendroctonus is based on an analysis of anatomical and biological characters. Among the anatomical structures found to be of greatest use in char- acterizing species were the seminal rod of the male genital capsule, the surface features of the frons, and the features of the elytral declivity. Characters of the egg gallery, position and arrangement of egg niches and grooves, and the character and position of the larval mines provided features for field recognition of species that were equal to, if not superior to, anatomical characters. -
SOUTHERN PINE BEETLE (Dendroctonus Frontalis Zimmermann)
SOUTHERN PINE BEETLE (Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann): SEMIOCHEMICAL ECOLOGY, RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OUTBREAK POPULATIONS AND LIGHTNING STRIKE, AND ECOLOGICAL IMPACTS OF SUPPRESSION AND CONTROL TECHNIQUES. by JENNY C. STAEBEN (Under the Direction of Kamal J. K. Gandhi) ABSTRACT The economically damaging southern pine beetle (Dendroctonus frontalis Zimmermann) is one of the most destructive insect pests in southeastern United States. SPB populations are monitored using a racemic kairomone, α-pinene, and pheromone, frontalin to capture SPB and predator, Thanasimus dubius (Fabricius). I assessed whether SPB and T. dubius differentiate between enantiomers of α-pinene. Results indicated the response of female and male SPB to α-pinene enantiomers did not significantly differ, although males were somewhat more responsive to (+)-α-pinene. Captures of T. dubius increased with volumes of α-pinene, and T. dubius did not differentiate between enantiomers. Typically SPB infest pines other southern pine bark beetle guild (SPBBG) members (which include Dendroctonus terebrans (Olivier) and Ips beetle species). Colonizing Ips species release either ipsdienol and/or ipsenol. I assessed the inter- and intraspecies attraction among SPBBG and their predators. Results indicate SPB and T. dubius are not attracted to Ips attractants and vice versa. BTB and Ips calligraphus (Germar) were attracted to Ips attractants. SPBBG predators (other than Pycnomerus sulcicollis LeConte) did not differentiate between SPB and Ips attractants. Using linear regression, I assessed the relationship between lightning strike and SPB infestations. Results indicated a relationship between SPB infestations developing within 100-250 m of a negatively-charged lightning strike with a magnitude of > 150 kilo amps. There was no relationship between the basal area pine stands and the likelihood of lightning strike. -
Electrophysiological and Behavioral Responses of Dendroctonus Valens to Non-Host Volatiles Long-Wa Zhang, Nancy E
Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Dendroctonus valens to non-host volatiles Long-Wa Zhang, Nancy E. Gillette, Jiang-Hua Sun To cite this version: Long-Wa Zhang, Nancy E. Gillette, Jiang-Hua Sun. Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Dendroctonus valens to non-host volatiles. Annals of Forest Science, Springer Nature (since 2011)/EDP Science (until 2010), 2007, 64 (3), pp.267-273. hal-00884079 HAL Id: hal-00884079 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00884079 Submitted on 1 Jan 2007 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ann. For. Sci. 64 (2007) 267–273 267 c INRA, EDP Sciences, 2007 DOI: 10.1051/forest:2007004 Original article Electrophysiological and behavioral responses of Dendroctonus valens to non-host volatiles Long-wa Za,b, Nancy E. Gc, Jiang-hua Sa* a State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100080, PR China b Graduate School of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100080, PR China c USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Berkeley, CA 94701, USA (Received 8 May 2006; accepted 25 August 2006 ) Abstract – Non-host volatiles (NHVs) that are often reported as being disruptive to coniferophagous bark beetles were tested for both electrophysiolog- ical and behavioral effects on the red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), which was accidentally introduced into China in the mid-1980’s. -
Red Turpentine Beetle)
Diagnostic protocol for the identification and detection of Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Red Turpentine Beetle) PEST STATUS Not present in Australia PROTOCOL NUMBER NDP 24 VERSION NUMBER V1.2 PROTOCOL STATUS Endorsed ISSUE DATE May 2013 REVIEW DATE May 2018 ISSUED BY SPHDS Prepared for the Subcommittee on Plant Health Diagnostic Standards (SPHDS) This version of the National Diagnostic Protocol (NDP) for Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Red Turpentine Beetle) is current as at the date contained in the version control box on the front of this document. NDPs are updated every 5 years or before this time if required (i.e. when new techniques become available). The most current version of this document is available from the National Plant Biosecurity Diagnostic Network (NPBDN) website: http://plantbiosecuritydiagnostics.net.au/resource- hub/priority-pest-diagnostic-resources/ Cover photograph: J. Bartlett, QPIF DEEDI CONTENTS 1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................1 1.1 Appearance .....................................................................................................1 1.2 Native Host Range ...........................................................................................2 1.3 Effect on host ...................................................................................................2 1.4 Relationship with other organisms ...................................................................2 2 Taxonomy ............................................................................................................4 -
Black Turpentine Beetle Jenny C
Forest Insect & Disease Leaflet 12 Revised April 2010 U.S. Department of Agriculture • Forest Service Black Turpentine Beetle Jenny C. Staeben1, Stephen Clarke2, and Kamal J.K. Gandhi1 Black turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus Missouri, Arkansas, and eastern Texas terebrans (Olivier), is the largest native (Figure 1). Its distribution corresponds pine bark beetle in the southeastern with the range of four of its major host United States. This beetle is usually species: pitch pine, P. rigida Mill.; loblolly considered a secondary pest, as it typically pine, P. taeda L.; shortleaf pine, P. colonizes freshly cut pine (Pinus spp.) echinata Mill.; and slash pine, P.elliottii stumps or trees stressed by natural and/or Englm. All southern pines within the anthropogenic factors. Trees weakened by range of the beetle may be attacked, as drought, fire, or other stresses, as well as well as red spruce (Picea rubens Sargent). pines wounded during storms or logging Historically, the most severe infestations operations are susceptible to attack. It of black turpentine beetle in the southeast is generally less aggressive than the closely related southern pine beetle (D. frontalis Zimmermann), and populations are often found cohabiting pines previously infested by southern pine beetle and/or pine engraver beetles (Ips spp.). Populations occasionally increase to levels in which apparently healthy pines may be successfully colonized. Distribution and Hosts The range of the black turpentine beetle extends from New Hampshire and Maine in the northeast United States southward Figure 1. Distribution of black turpentine beetle in the to Florida, and westward to U.S. as based on historical records, current surveys, and distribution of known host species. -
Biological Strategies of Invasive Bark Beetles and Borers Species
insects Article Biological Strategies of Invasive Bark Beetles and Borers Species Denis A. Demidko 1,2,* , Natalia N. Demidko 3, Pavel V. Mikhaylov 2,* and Svetlana M. Sultson 2 1 Sukachev Institute of Forest, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Science, 50, bil. 28, Akademgorodok, 660036 Krasnoyarsk, Russia 2 Scientific Laboratory of Forest Health, Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology, Krasnoyarskii Rabochii Prospekt. 31, 660037 Krasnoyarsk, Russia; [email protected] 3 Department of Medical and Biological Basics of Physical Education and Health Technologies, School of Physical Education, Sport and Tourism, Siberian Federal University, Svobodny ave. 79, 660041 Krasnoyarsk, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (D.A.D.); [email protected] (P.V.M.) Simple Summary: Biological invasions are one of the most critical problems today. Invaders have been damaging tree- and shrub-dominated ecosystems. Among these harmful species, a notable role belongs to bark beetles and borers. Extensive phytosanitary measures are needed to prevent their penetration into new regions. However, the lists of quarantine pests should be reasonably brief for more effective prevention of invasion of potentially harmful insects. Our goal is to reveal the set of biological traits of invasive bark beetles and borers that are currently known. We identified four invasion strategies. Inbred, the first one is characterized by inbreeding, parthenogenesis, polyvoltin- ism, xylomycetophagy, flightless males, polyphagy, to less extent by association with pathogenic fungi. For the second, polyphagous, typical traits are polyphagy, feeding on wood, high fecundity, distance sex pheromones presence, development for one year or more. The third strategy, intermediate, Citation: Demidko, D.A.; Demidko, possesses such features as mono- or olygophagy, feeding on inner-bark, short (one year or less) N.N.; Mikhaylov, P.V.; Sultson, S.M. -
Dendroctonus Valens
FFFOREST PPPEST SSSPECIES PPPROFILE November 2007 Dendroctonus valens LeConte Other scientific names: Dendroctonus rhizophagus Order and Family: Coleoptera: Scolytidae Common names: red turpentine beetle; bark beetle The red turpentine beetle is a common pest of forest, shade and park trees of pole size or larger. It is native to North America and was accidentally introduced into China in the 1980s presumably on unprocessed logs imported from the western US. Red turpentine beetles can be distinguished from engraver beetles by their larger size, reddish-brown colour and the presence of large, pinkish brown to white pitch tubes, a mixture of pine sap and beetle boring dust, on the lower trunk of infected hosts. Adult red turpentine beetle (Photo: J.R. Baker & S.B. Bambara, North Carolina State University, Bugwood.org) DISTRIBUTION Native : North America, Mexico, portions of Central America (Wood, 1982) Introduced : China (mid 1980s) IDENTIFICATION Eggs are shiny, opaque white, ovoid cylindrical, and a little over 1 mm in length (Smith, 1971). Larvae are grublike, legless and white with a brown head capsule and a small brown area at the hind end (Smith, 1971). A row of small, pale-brown tubercles develop along each side of the body. Full grown larvae are approximately 10-12 mm long. Pupae are white and slightly shorter than the larvae. Adult beetles are typically long and stout, about 6-10 mm long and dark brown to black in colour with reddish-brown wing covers (Smith, 1971; Hagle, Gibson and Tunnock, 2003). HOSTS In its native range, hosts include: Pinus spp. – P. resinosa , P. contorta , P. -
The Red Turpentine Beetle, Dendroctonus Valens Leconte (Scolytidae): an Exotic Invasive Pest of Pine in China
Biodiversity and Conservation 14: 1735–1760, 2005. Ó Springer 2005 DOI 10.1007/s10531-004-0697-9 The red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Scolytidae): an exotic invasive pest of pine in China ZHENGLIANG YAN1, JIANGHUA SUN1, OWEN DON2 and ZHONGNING ZHANG1,* 1State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 25 Beisihuanxilu, Haidian, Beijing 100080, China; 2California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, 6105 Airport Rd, Redding, CA 96002, USA; *Author for correspondence (e-mail: [email protected]; fax: +86-10-62565689) Received 17 June 2003; accepted in revised form 9 February 2004 Key words: Bark beetle, Dendroctonus valens, Exotic pest, Outbreak, Pinus tabuliformis, Sclytidae Abstract. An exotic invasive pest of pines, the red turpentine beetle, Dendroctonus valens LeConte (Scolytidae) (RTB), was first detected in Shanxi Province, northern China, in 1998 and started causing widespread tree mortality there in 1999. This outbreak continues and has spread to three adjacent provinces, causing unprecedented tree mortality. Although it is considered a minor pest of pines in North America, RTB has proven to be an aggressive and destructive pest of Pinus tabuliformis, China’s most widely planted pine species. The bionomics and occurrence, distribution, response to host volatiles, and host preference of this pine beetle in China are compared with what is known of the beetle in its native range in North America. Factors likely contributing to D. valens success in China and control of the beetle outbreak are discussed. (À)-b-pinene was shown to be the most attractive host volatile for D. -
Semiochemicals and the Management of Rhizophagus Grandis Gyll. (Col., Rhizophagidae) for the Biocontrol of Dendroctonus Micans Kug
J. Appl. Ent. 114 (1992), 110-112 0 1992 Verlag Paul Parey, Hamburg und Berlin ISSN 093 1-2048 Laboratoire de Biologie animale et cellulaire CP 160, Universiti Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium, and Institut fir Organische Chemie, Universitat Hamburg, FRG Semiochemicals and the management of Rhizophagus grandis Gyll. (Col., Rhizophagidae) for the biocontrol of Dendroctonus micans Kug. (Col., Scolytidae)’ By J.-C. GR~GOIRE,D. COUILLIEN, A. DRUMONT,H. MEYERand W. FRANCKE Abstract Semiochemicals can be exploited for rearing and monitoring natural enemies involved in biological control. The predator Rhizophagus grandis, which is used against Dendroctonus micans, is now artificially mass-produced using synthetic oviposition stimuli. Recent results from the laboratory and the field also suggest that R. grandis population levels could be monitored using synthetic attractants. 1 Introduction The predator Rhizophagus grandis is widely used for the biological control of the greater Eurasian spruce beetle, Dendroctonus micans. It is, or has been, mass-cultured and released on thousands of hectares in the USSR (KOBAKHIDZE1965), France (GRBGOIREet al. 1984), the United Kingdom (KING and EVANS1985) and Turkey (N. USLU,pers. com.). This specific predator needs precise chemical signals to locate its prey, and semiochemicals are also needed as oviposition stimulants. These compounds have been recently identified and bioassayed. Synthetic oviposition stimulants are now used in mass culturing R. grundis, whilst release-recapture experiments suggest that the predator could soon be successfully monitored in the field using synthetic kairomones. 2 Oviposition stimulants A comparative analysis of the larval frass of D. micans and D. valens (an American species which elicited oviposition by R. -
Willamette Valley Ponderosa Pine- a Primer Rick Fletcher, OSU Extension Service July 2007
Willamette Valley Ponderosa Pine- A Primer Rick Fletcher, OSU Extension Service July 2007 History of Ponderosa Pine in the Willamette Valley The year was 1852, and white settlement of the Willamette Valley was well underway. The town of Monroe was just getting its start with a new water-powered sawmill. The mill’s records indicate that it cut ponderosa pine exclusively for several years until the supply ran out. Other reports and studies of ponderosa pine in the Willamette Valley paint a picture of ponderosa in scattered pure stands or mixed in groves with Douglas-fir, ash, and oak. Two studies (Hansen, Warona) using pollen counts in deep cores from Willamette Valley bogs track pines’ presence for the last 7,000 to 10,000 years. The hypothesis is that lodgepole was the dominant pine until about 7,000 years ago when a major climate shift removed lodgepole and brought in ponderosa pine. Pollen counts covering these 7,000 years indicate that ponderosa pine, while widespread across the valley, has never been the dominant vegetation type. Undoubtedly there is some connection between indigenous peoples’ practice of burning and the distribution of pine in the valley at time of white settlement. Ponderosa pine is very common in other fire-impacted landscapes and is quite tolerant of ground fires, especially when the trees are mature. The frequent ground fires set by native peoples very likely resulted in the widely spaced groves of “yellow pines” (ponderosas), surrounded by grass prairie, which confronted early settlers. Surveyors, botanists, and historians in the 1850s recorded yellow pines in oak woodlands, on areas subject to flooding, and on foothill slopes and ridges where they were widely spaced and mixed with oak and Douglas-fir.