New Jersey Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report 2006

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Jersey Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report 2006 NJ Department of Environmental Protection Water Monitoring and Standards New Jersey Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report 2006 December 2006 State of New Jersey NJ Department of Environmental Protection Jon S. Corzine, Governor Lisa P. Jackson, Commissioner New Jersey 2006 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring And Assessment Report New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection December 2006 Table of Contents Executive Summary Chapter 1 Overview: New Jersey’s Water Resources Chapter 2 Water Quality Monitoring 2.1 Summary of Water Quality Monitoring Programs 2.2 Probability-Based Monitoring Chapter 3 Water Quality Assessment 3.1 Summary of Assessment Methods 3.2 Summary of Data used for 2006 Assessment 3.3 Trend Analyses 1985-2004 Chapter 4 Results of 2006 Water Quality Assessment 4.1 Designated Uses of New Jersey’s Waters 4.2 Aquatic Life Uses 4.3 Recreational Uses 4.4 Drinking Water Supply Use 4.5 Industrial and Agricultural Water Supply Uses 4.6 Fish Consumption Use 4.7 Shellfish Harvest Use 4.8 Integrated Assessment and Listing Process Chapter 5 Water Quality Management 5.1 Overview of Water Quality Management Programs 5.2 Water Quality Management Planning Program 5.3 Water Quality Standards Program 5.4 Water Pollution Control Programs (NJPDES) 5.5 Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Programs 5.6 TMDL Program 5.7 Coastal Management Program 5.8 Atmospheric Deposition Reduction Strategies 5.9 New Jersey Environmental Infrastructure Trust Financing Program 5.10 Land Acquisition for Water Quality Protection 5.11 Water Education and Outreach 5.12 Regional Water Quality Initiatives 5.13 New Jersey’s Wetlands Protection Program Chapter 6 Public Health Concerns 6.1 Source Water Protection 6.2 Consumption Advisories Chapter 7 Cost/Benefit Analysis Table of Contents i New Jersey 2006 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring And Assessment Report New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection December 2006 Chapter 8 Public Participation Chapter 9 Next Steps - Preparing for 2008 and Beyond Appendices Appendix A-1 Integrated List (without lakes) Appendix A-2 Integrated List- Lakes Appendix B 303d List of Water Quality Limited Waters (“List of Impaired Waters”) Appendix C Delisted Waters Appendix D Two-Year TMDL Schedule Appendix E Response to Comments Document Appendix F Data Sources Appendix G Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Methods (Methods Document) Appendix H New Jersey’s Water Monitoring and Assessment Strategy Appendix I New Jersey’s Ambient Ground Water Quality Monitoring Network Appendix J Surface Water Quality Standards NJAC 7:9B Appendix K Status of TMDLs From The 2004 Integrated Report’s Two-Year TMDL Schedule Appendix L Section 319(h) Grant Projects Funded SFY ‘03-’05 Table of Contents ii New Jersey 2006 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring And Assessment Report December 2006 Executive Summary The New Jersey 2006 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report (Integrated Report) is intended to provide an effective tool for maintaining high quality waters and improving the quality of waters that do not attain their designated uses. The Integrated Report describes attainment of the designated uses specified in New Jersey's Surface Water Quality Standards (N.J.A.C. 7:9B), which include: aquatic life, recreation, drinking water, fish consumption, shellfish consumption, industrial and agricultural. The Integrated Report provides water resource managers and citizens with information regarding: • the use attainment status for all assessed waters of the State, • the methods used to assess use attainment, • the pollutants causing water quality impairment(s) and their sources, and • management strategies, including total maximum daily loads (TMDLs), under development to achieve surface water quality standards and attain the designated uses of the waters. The Integrated Report also identifies ongoing and planned strategies to maintain and improve water quality statewide, improve and expand water quality monitoring and improve water quality assessment methods. Federal Reporting Requirements: The Federal Clean Water Act (Act) mandates that states submit biennial reports to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) describing the quality of their waters. The biennial Water Quality Inventory Report or “305(b) Report” must include the status of principal waters in terms of overall water quality and support of designated uses, as well as strategies to maintain and improve water quality. The 305(b) reports are used by Congress and USEPA to establish program priorities and funding for federal and state water resource management programs. The Act also requires states to biennially submit to USEPA a list of waterbodies that are not attaining water quality standards, despite the implementation of technology-based effluent limits. All such impaired waterbodies must be identified on this List of Water Quality Limited Waters or “303(d) List.” States must prioritize 303(d)-listed waterbodies for Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) analyses and identify those high priority waterbodies for which they anticipate establishing TMDLs in the next two years. The Integrated Report satisfies the reporting requirements of sections 303(d), 305(b) and 314 and, in doing so, also satisfies the 305(b) reporting requirement for section 106 grant New Jersey 2006 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring And Assessment Report New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection December 2006 funds. For states to be eligible for section 106 grant funds, section 106(e)(1) requires that states must have the means to monitor water quality (including “navigable waters and to the extent practicable, ground waters”) and annually update water quality data and include it in their section 305(b) submittals. As per the 2006 Integrated Reporting Guidance, USEPA will not award any section 106 funding under a section 106 grant or a performance partnership grant (PPG) to any state that has not annually updated its monitoring data and submitted the most recent report required under section 305(b). By April 1 of all even numbered years, states must submit to USEPA the description of the water quality of all waters in the State and the extent to which the quality of waters provides for the protection and propagation of a balanced population of shellfish, fish, and wildlife and allows recreational activities in and on the water. USEPA began issuing guidance (USEPA 2001) for the development of an Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Report (Integrated Report) by the states beginning with the Year 2002 submittal. The Integrated Report improves overall water quality reporting by providing detailed descriptions of data sources and assessment methods as a basis for sound, technical assessment decisions not included in earlier 305(b) Reports. In addition, assessment results are represented in a spatial context, presenting a clearer picture of water quality across the State. Monitoring needs and schedules are described, facilitating the articulation of monitoring priorities and identifying opportunities for cooperation with other agencies and watershed partners. TMDL needs and schedules, as well as other management strategies, are defined to convey plans for water quality improvements. Finally, the public participation aspects provide opportunities for data submittal and open discussion of water quality assessment methods and results. The Department’s 2006 Integrated Report was developed based on USEPA guidance for the preparation of 2006 Integrated Lists. About This Report: The 2006 Integrated Report is organized into two components, the Main Report, which serves as a summary document explaining each aspect of the water quality assessment process and the overall results; and an Appendix, which includes the reports, findings, methods, and other documentation supporting the results of the statewide use attainment assessment. The Main Report includes the following chapters: 1. Overview of New Jersey’s Water Resources 2. Water Quality Monitoring 3. Water Quality Assessment (Includes assessment methods, data used and trends ) 4. Results of 2006 Water Quality Assessment 5. Water Quality Management (Includes program descriptions) 6. Public Health Concerns 7. Cost/Benefit Analysis 8. Public Participation, and 9. Next Steps: Preparing for 2008 and Beyond Executive Summary 2 New Jersey 2006 Integrated Water Quality Monitoring And Assessment Report New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection December 2006 The Appendix includes: • Appendix A: The Integrated List organized by designated uses • Appendix B: 303(d) List∗ of Water Quality Limited Waters (or “List of Impaired Waters”), including priority ranking for TMDLs • Appendix C: Delisted Waters, indicating where waters previously listed on Sublist 5 of the 2004 Integrated List are currently identified on the 2006 Integrated List. • Appendix D: The Two-Year TMDL Schedule • Appendix E: Response to Comments Document containing all Department responses to public and USEPA comments on the Methods Document and Integrated List, as mandated by the public participation process. • Appendix F: Data sources used for the water quality assessment • Appendix G: Integrated Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Methods (Methods Document) detailing the Department’s assessment methods as applied to the Integrated List. • Appendix H: New Jersey’s Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Strategy • Appendix I: New Jersey’s Ambient Ground Water Monitoring Network, including an assessment of ground water quality
Recommended publications
  • J. Matthew Bellisle, P.E. Senior Vice President
    J. Matthew Bellisle, P.E. Senior Vice President RELEVANT EXPERIENCE Mr. Bellisle possesses more than 20 years of experience working on a variety of geotechnical, foundation, civil, and dam engineering projects. He has acted as principal-in-charge, project manager, and project engineer for assignments involving geotechnical design, site investigations, testing, instrumentation, and construction monitoring. His experience also includes over 500 Phase I inspections and Phase II design services for earthen and concrete dams. REGISTRATIONS AND Relevant project experience includes: CERTIFICATIONS His experience includes value engineering of alternate foundation systems, Professional Engineer – Massachusetts, ground improvement methodologies, and temporary construction support. Mr. Rhode Island, Bellisle has also developed environmental permit applications and presented at New Hampshire, New York public hearings in support of public and private projects. Dam Engineering PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS): Principal-in- American Society of Civil Charge/Project Manager for various stability analyses and reports to assess Engineers long-term performance of vegetated emergency spillways. Association of State Dam - Hop Brook Floodwater Retarding Dam – Emergency Spillway Safety Officials Evaluation - George H. Nichols Multipurpose Dam – Conceptual Design of an Armored Spillway EDUCATION - Lester G. Ross Floodwater Retarding Dam – Emergency Spillway University of Rhode Island: Evaluation M.S., Civil Engineering 2001 - Cold Harbor Floodwater Retarding Dam – Emergency Spillway B.S., Civil & Environmental Evaluation Engineering, 1992 - Delaney Complex Dams – Emergency Spillway Evaluation PUBLICATIONS AND Hobbs Pond Dam: Principal-in-Charge/Project Manager for the design PRESENTATIONS and development of construction documents of a new armored auxiliary spillway and new primary spillway to repair a filed embankment and Bellisle, J.M., Chopy, D, increase discharge capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Moses Hayim Luzzatto's Quest for Providence
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 'Like Iron to a Magnet': Moses Hayim Luzzatto's Quest for Providence David Sclar Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/380 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] “Like Iron to a Magnet”: Moses Hayim Luzzatto’s Quest for Providence By David Sclar A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in History in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The City University of New York 2014 © 2014 David Sclar All Rights Reserved This Manuscript has been read and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in History in satisfaction of the Dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Prof. Jane S. Gerber _______________ ____________________________________ Date Chair of the Examining Committee Prof. Helena Rosenblatt _______________ ____________________________________ Date Executive Officer Prof. Francesca Bregoli _______________________________________ Prof. Elisheva Carlebach ________________________________________ Prof. Robert Seltzer ________________________________________ Prof. David Sorkin ________________________________________ Supervisory Committee iii Abstract “Like Iron to a Magnet”: Moses Hayim Luzzatto’s Quest for Providence by David Sclar Advisor: Prof. Jane S. Gerber This dissertation is a biographical study of Moses Hayim Luzzatto (1707–1746 or 1747). It presents the social and religious context in which Luzzatto was variously celebrated as the leader of a kabbalistic-messianic confraternity in Padua, condemned as a deviant threat by rabbis in Venice and central and eastern Europe, and accepted by the Portuguese Jewish community after relocating to Amsterdam.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 Integrated List of Waterbodies
    Appendix IA State of New Jersey's Sublist 1 2002 Integrated List of Waterbodies Phosphorus,Fecal Coliform, pH, Temperature, Atlantic Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, TSS, Unionized Coast 15 Absecon Creek S Br near Pomona 01410455 Ammonia NJDEP/USGS Data Atlantic Phosphorus, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Coast 14 Albertson Br near Elm 0140940970 Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, Unionized Ammonia USGS/Pinelands Data Phosphorus,Fecal Coliform, pH, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, NJDEP/USGS Data, Metal Northwest 11 AssunpInk Creek near Clarksville 01463620, 11-AS-2 TSS, Unionized Ammonia Recon Phosphorus, Fecal Coliform, Temperature, Atlantic Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, Coast 15 Babcock Creek near Mays LandIng 01411196 TSS, Unionized Ammonia NJDEP/USGS Data Phosphorus, Temperature, Nitrate, Unionized Raritan 09 Barclay Brook near Englishtown 01405285 Ammonia NJDEP/USGS Data Phosphorus, Fecal Coliform, pH, Temperature, Atlantic Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, TSS, Unionized Coast 14 Bass River E Br near New Gretna 01410150 Ammonia NJDEP/USGS Data Phosphorus, Fecal Coliform, Temperature, Atlantic Dissolved Oxygen, Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, NJDEP/USGS Data, Metal Coast 14 Batsto River at Batsto 01409500, 14-BAT-1 TSS, Unionized Ammonia, Chromium, Zinc Recon Atlantic Phosphorus, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Coast 14 Batsto River at Hampton Furnace 01409432 Nitrate, Dissolved Solids, Unionized Ammonia USGS/Pinelands Data Atlantic Phosphorus, Temperature, Dissolved Oxygen, Coast 14 Batsto River at Quaker Bridge 01409470
    [Show full text]
  • Wallkill River
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge At the Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge, we conserve the biological diversity of the Wallkill Valley by protecting and managing land, with a special emphasis on s% i 7 7 7* 7 migrating wate / fo wl, wintering raptors, and endangered species, while providing \ opportunities for scientific research J *tind compatible I public use. ' Our Mission Congress established the Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge in 1990 "to preserve and enhance refuge lands and waters in a manner that will conserve the natural diversity of fish, wildlife, plants, This blue goose, and their habitats for present and designed by J.N. future generations and to provide "Ding" Darling, opportunities for compatible has become the scientific research, environmental symbol of the education, and fish and wildlife- National Wildlife oriented recreation." Congress Refuge System. /. also required the protection of •/. aquatic habitats within the refuge, •- including the Wallkill River and '53 Papakating Creek. - The individual purposes of this Wallkill River refuge are supported by the mission in fall The refuge is located along a nine-mile of the National Wildlife Refuge stretch of the Wallkill River, and lies in System, of which the Wallkill River a rolling valley within the Appalachian refuge is a part. That mission is Ridge and Valley physiographic "to administer a national network province. The Wallkill Valley is of lands and waters for the bounded by the Kittatinny Ridge to conservation, management, and the west and the New York/New where appropriate, restoration of Jersey Highlands to the east. This the fish, wildlife, and plant resources area is part of the Great Valley, which and their habitats within the United extends from Canada to the southern States for the benefit of present and United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Sussex County Open Space and Recreation Plan.”
    OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN for the County of Sussex “People and Nature Together” Compiled by Morris Land Conservancy with the Sussex County Open Space Committee September 30, 2003 County of Sussex Open Space and Recreation Plan produced by Morris Land Conservancy’s Partners for Greener Communities team: David Epstein, Executive Director Laura Szwak, Assistant Director Barbara Heskins Davis, Director of Municipal Programs Robert Sheffield, Planning Manager Tanya Nolte, Mapping Manager Sandy Urgo, Land Preservation Specialist Anne Bowman, Land Acquisition Administrator Holly Szoke, Communications Manager Letty Lisk, Office Manager Student Interns: Melissa Haupt Brian Henderson Brian Licinski Ken Sicknick Erin Siek Andrew Szwak Dolce Vieira OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION PLAN for County of Sussex “People and Nature Together” Compiled by: Morris Land Conservancy a nonprofit land trust with the County of Sussex Open Space Advisory Committee September 2003 County of Sussex Board of Chosen Freeholders Harold J. Wirths, Director Joann D’Angeli, Deputy Director Gary R. Chiusano, Member Glen Vetrano, Member Susan M. Zellman, Member County of Sussex Open Space Advisory Committee Austin Carew, Chairperson Glen Vetrano, Freeholder Liaison Ray Bonker Louis Cherepy Libby Herland William Hookway Tom Meyer Barbara Rosko Eric Snyder Donna Traylor Acknowledgements Morris Land Conservancy would like to acknowledge the following individuals and organizations for their help in providing information, guidance, research and mapping materials for the County of
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Load to Address Arsenic in the Wallkill River and Papakating Creek Northwest Water Region
    Amendment to the Sussex County Water Quality Management Plan Total Maximum Daily Load to Address Arsenic in the Wallkill River and Papakating Creek Northwest Water Region Watershed Management Area 2 (Wallkill River, and Pochuck, Papakating, Rutgers Creeks Watersheds) Proposed: July 19, 2004 Established: September 23, 2004 Approved (by EPA Region 2): September 29, 2004 Adopted: New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management Bureau of Environmental Analysis and Restoration P.O. Box 418 Trenton, New Jersey 08625-0418 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary 4 2.0 Introduction 6 3.0 Background 6 4.0 Pollutant of Concern and Area of Interest 9 5.0 Applicable Surface Water Quality Standards 16 6.0 Water Quality Data and Source Assessment 17 7.0 TMDL Calculations 24 8.0 Implementation Plan 26 9.0 Follow-up Monitoring 29 10.0 Reasonable Assurance 29 11.0 Public Participation 30 Tables Table 1. Locations of Wallkill River and Papakating Creek TMDLs 4 Table 2. Arsenic impaired stream segments in the Wallkill River And Papakating Creek Watersheds 8 Table 3. Wallkill River and Papakating Creek Watersheds 1995-97 Land Use/Land Cover (by HUC 14) Total Area = acre 14 Table 4. Water Quality Monitoring Sites and Data Supporting Arsenic TMDLs 18 Table 5. Treatment works that Discharge to Surface Waters in the Wallkill River and Papakating Creek Watersheds 19 Table 6. Wasteload and Load reductions with a 5 percent margin of safety 25 Figures Figure 1. Locations of Impaired Monitoring Stations for the Wallkill River Watershed and Papakating Creek Watersheds 5 Figure 2a.
    [Show full text]
  • Musconetcong River National Wild and Scenic Rivers Study
    Musconetcong River National Wild and Scenic Rivers Study River Management Plan Prepared by: Musconetcong River Management Council Musconetcong Watershed Association Heritage Conservancy National Park Service June 2011 Update The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. Musconetcong National Wild and Scenic River Management Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This management plan proposes a strategy for managing the Musconetcong River and its many outstanding resource values. It was prepared as part of a study to evaluate the Musconetcong River for inclusion in the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System. The Musconetcong River drains a 157.6 square mile watershed area in northern New Jersey, and as a major tributary to the Delaware River, is part of the 12,755 square mile Delaware River watershed. The Musconetcong River is a boundary water for its entire length, first dividing Morris and Sussex counties, then Hunterdon and Warren counties. All or portions of 26 municipalities lie within the natural boundaries of the Musconetcong watershed. Fourteen municipalities fall within the river segments eligible for National Wild and Scenic Rivers designation. The impetus for the Musconetcong National Wild and Scenic Rivers study can be traced back to 1991, when petitions were circulated calling for the protection of the Musconetcong River under both the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System and New Jersey Wild and Scenic Rivers program. In 1992, Congress passed legislation authorizing the National Park Service to study the eligibility and potential suitability of the Lower Delaware River for addition to the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System.
    [Show full text]
  • LRM 9/27/01 Complete
    Public Meeting of NEW JERSEY LAKE RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT ADVISORY TASK FORCE LOCATION: Borough Hall DATE: September 27, 2001 Mt. Arlington, New Jersey 11:00 a.m. MEMBERS OF TASK FORCE PRESENT: Senator Anthony R. Bucco (Vice-Chairman) Assemblyman Reed Gusciora Carmen Armenti Matthew Garamone Dirk C. Hofman John Hutchison III James E. Mumman Frances Smith Mark Smith John Terry ALSO PRESENT: James Requa (representing Martin Bierbaum) Zina M. Gamuzza Director of Communications Hearing Recorded and Transcribed by The Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit, State House Annex, PO 068, Trenton, New Jersey for Assemblyman Corodemus TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Anthony Albanese Chairman Lake Hopatcong Commission Mt. Arlington Borough, New Jersey 11 Arthur Crane representing Hibernia Fire Company Rockaway Township, New Jersey 12 Kenneth H. Klipstein Bureau Chief Division of Watershed Management New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection 20 Peter Rand Chairman Lake Arrowhead Club Denville, New Jersey 25 Charles Weldon representing Indian Lake Denville, New Jersey 30 Robert Caldo representing Cozy Lake Association Jefferson Township, New Jersey 31 Clifford R. Lundin, Esq. President Lake Hopatcong Protective Association Mt. Arlington Borough, New Jersey 33 John Inglesino Freeholder Morris County, New Jersey, and TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Mayor Rockaway Township, New Jersey 36 Joseph Nametko representing Lake Musconetcong Regional Planning Board Roxbury Township, New Jersey 38 Ronald Gatti Township Manager Byram Township, New Jersey 40 Schuyler Martin President Lake Swannanoa Sentinal Society Jefferson Township, New Jersey 43 Fred Suljic County Planning Director Division of Planning Sussex County, New Jersey 49 Senator Robert E. Littell District 24 52 mlc: 1-55 SENATOR ANTHONY R.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents General Information........................................................................................................................ 2 Resort Map...................................................................................................................................... 3 Resort Internet Options................................................................................................................... 4 Resort Business Center and Paper Copies ...................................................................................... 4 Resort Restaurants and Bars ......................................................................................................... 11 Schedule of Events........................................................................................................................ 12 Special Events............................................................................................................................... 15 Conference Center Floor Plan....................................................................................................... 18 Technical Program........................................................................................................................ 19 Technical Sessions Monday Session 1: Attitude Dynamics & Control I .................................................................................. 19 Session 2: Attitude Estimation....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • JULIA, ANNE, MARIE PONT Née Le 22 Avril 1975 À PARIS XVI
    ENVT ANNEE 2003 THESE : 2003- TOU 3 DES ANIMAUX, DES GUERRES ET DES HOMMES De l’utilisation des animaux dans les guerres de l’antiquité à nos jours THESE Pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR VETERINAIRE DIPLOME D’ETAT Présentée et soutenue publiquement en 2003 Devant l’Université Paul-Sabatier de Toulouse Par JULIA, ANNE, MARIE PONT Née le 22 avril 1975 à PARIS XVI Directeur de thèse : M. le Professeur Michel FRANC JURY Liste des professeurs 2 A Monsieur le Professeur …. 3 Professeur de la faculté de Médecine de Toulouse Qui nous a fait l’honneur d’accepter la présidence de notre jury de thèse A Monsieur le Professeur Michel Franc Professeur à l’Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse Qui a accepté de diriger cette thèse, pour la confiance et la patience qu’il a bien voulu m’accorder. Je vous témoigne toute ma gratitude et ma profonde reconnaissance. A Monsieur….. Professeur à l’Ecole Nationale vétérinaire de Toulouse Pour l’attention qu’il a bien voulu apporter à l’examen de ce travail 4 A mes parents, présents au jour le jour. Ce que je suis aujourd’hui je vous le dois. Vous m’avez épaulée dans chaque moment de ma vie, soutenue dans tous les tracas et les aléas de l’existence, poussée en avant pour tenter de donner le meilleur de moi-même. Si aujourd’hui je réalise mon rêve d’enfant, c’est en grande partie grâce à vous, à la ligne de conduite que vous m’avez montrée, autant dans ma vie personnelle que professionnelle.
    [Show full text]
  • Dam Safety Program
    STATE OF RHODE ISLAND 2009 Annual Report to the Governor on the Activities of the DAM SAFETY PROGRAM Overtopping earthen embankment of Creamer Dam (No. 742), Tiverton Department of Environmental Management Prepared by the Office of Compliance and Inspection TABLE OF CONTENTS HISTORY OF RHODE ISLAND’S DAM SAFETY PROGRAM....................................................................3 STATUTES................................................................................................................................................3 GOVERNOR’S TASK FORCE ON DAM SAFETY AND MAINTENANCE .................................................3 DAM SAFETY REGULATIONS .................................................................................................................4 DAM CLASSIFICATIONS..........................................................................................................................5 INSPECTION PROGRAM ............................................................................................................................7 ACTIVITIES IN 2009.....................................................................................................................................8 UNSAFE DAMS.........................................................................................................................................8 INSPECTIONS ........................................................................................................................................10 High Hazard Dam Inspections .............................................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • Steady-State Computer Model of the Water-Table Aquifer in the Mullica River Basin, the Pine Barrens, New Jersey
    STEADY-STATE COMPUTER MODEL OF THE WATER-TABLE AQUIFER IN THE MULLICA RIVER BASIN, THE PINE BARRENS, NEW JERSEY By Arlen W. Harbaugh and Carol L. Tilley U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water Resources Investigations Report 84-4295 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES and the U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS Trenton, New Jersey 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information, Copies of this report can write to: be purchased from: District Chief Open-File Services Section U.S. Geological Survey Western Distribution Branch Room 418, Federal Building U.S. Geological Survey 402 East State Street Box 25425, Federal Center Trenton, New Jersey 08608 Lakewood, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ••... ..................... 1 Introduction •.. 1 Hydrogeology. 3 Physiographic features .. 3 Geologic features .•. 3 Hydrology ....•...• 4 Hydrologic cycle. 7 Steady-state model development .. 7 Model design. 9 Streams and swamps. 9 Grid design ....... 10 Boundary conditions ... 10 Model input data ... 12 Aquifer •. 12 Stream. 12 Stress. 15 Model calibration .. 15 Performance criteria. 15 Results ..... 19 Summary and conclusions .. 25 References cited .. 28 Appendix ........ 29 Model stream stage .. 30 Streambed conductance. 33 Model-simulated water leve 1 .. 36 iii ILLUSTRATIONS Page Figure 1. Map showing location of Mullica River basin, Pine Barrens, and Wharton State Forest............ 2 2. Block diagram of uppermost Coastal Plain sediments.. 6 3. Hydrologic cycle of Mullica River basin section..... 8 4. Map of model grid and boundaries .................... 11 5. Map of simulated altitude of base of Kirkwood- Cohansey aquifer system ..........................
    [Show full text]