DOCSLIB.ORG

The Big Picture. on the Origin of Life, Meaning, and the Universe Itself

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Big Picture. on the Origin of Life, Meaning, and the Universe Itself Vol 15 | No 3 • Winter 2020 38 Book review SA Ophthalmology Journal The Big Picture. On the origin of life, meaning, and the universe itself Author: Sean Carroll Year of publication: 2016 Number of pages: 467 Reviewer: Clive Novis ([email protected]) ean Carroll is a theoretical physicist at the discussed in detail. Statistics and the laws of carbon dioxide so as to release the free energy SCalifornia Institute of Technology. He was probability are vital for trying to get as close contained within that molecule? born in 1966 and is a master at simplifying to the truth as possible. This is especially Part five: Thinking, neuroscience, and and explaining difficult physics concepts so important in the biomedical fields where so theories of consciousness. The controversial that the intelligent layman can get some sort much uncertainty exists. Cognitive biases topic of free will has been discussed by of understanding of these things. need to be avoided. Doctors need to have a philosophers and scientists for a long time. What is ‘naturalism’? Naturalism is the good grasp of these concepts in order to make Poetic naturalism has a very satisfying belief in natural laws (of physics), rejecting judgements about issues that affect the health solution: there is no such thing as free will any supernatural beliefs and superstitions. and well-being of our patients and of society if you are talking about atoms, sub-atomic ‘Poetic naturalism’ is what this book is all as a whole. particles and quantum wave functions, which about and is Dr Carroll’s main world view. Part three is entitled ‘Essence’ and here is the underlying stuff of which our brains Poetic naturalism is a philosophical approach Dr Carroll tries to explain the ‘Core Theory’ are made. But there sure is free will if you’re to naturalism which encourages a variety of of reality. The core theory consists of two talking about the brain as an organ of a ways to talk about the world, using language parts: ‘the standard model’ which is the human being alive in the natural world today. dependent on what’s being discussed. model of quantum mechanics, quantum Part six: Caring. Now Dr Carroll softens This book is divided into six parts: fields, particles and forces. The other part of the rigorous scientific thinking to discuss Part one discusses the fundamental nature the core theory is general relativity and the morality and the meaning of human life. In of reality (philosophers call this the study explanation of gravity. the penultimate chapter of the book (chapter of ontology), time, and the evolution of the Part four is entitled ‘Complexity’, with 49), Dr Carroll uses the Ten Commandments cosmos as a whole. Also discussed are the entropy being the focus of attention (back to as a basis for an updated ‘Ten Considerations’ second law of thermodynamics, the laws of the second law of thermodynamics). The only for us modern humans. He says that conservation of momentum and determinism reason complex structures (like living things) the important distinction is not between in general. These give rise to very deep form, explains Carroll, is that the universe ‘naturalists’ (like himself) and ‘theists’ but it’s questions and Carroll says that we have every is undergoing a gradual evolution from very between people who care enough about the right to ask them, but we have no right to low to very high entropy. The difficult concept universe to make an effort to understand it demand answers that will satisfy us! of ‘energy’ is discussed, including how living and those who simply take it for granted. Part two is all about understanding and things store energy in the form of ATP If another lockdown comes and I am how we learn about the world. Principles of molecules inside mitochondria. Did you know granted only one book to read or re-read, this statistics are explained, and Bayes theorem is that the ‘purpose’ of life is to hydrogenate book would definitely be on my short list. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Sean Carroll On, “Poetic Naturalism” Julia
    Rationally Speaking #162: Sean Carroll on, “Poetic Naturalism” Julia: Welcome to Rationally Speaking, the podcast where we explore the borderlands between reason and nonsense. I'm your host, Julia Galef, and with me is today's guest, physicist Sean Carroll. He's a returning guest on Rationally Speaking, and to refresh your memory, he's a theoretical physicist at The California Institute of Technology. He is a blogger at Preposterous Universe and the author of several books on physics and philosophy for a popular audience, including From Eternity to Here and The Particle at the End of the Universe, and most recently, The Big Picture: on the Origins of Life, Meaning and the Universe Itself. It's a big, ambitious subtitle that we're going to explore on today's episode. Sean, welcome back to Rationally Speaking. Sean: It's great to be here. Thanks for having me, Julia. Julia: The core project of The Big Picture I would say, feel free to correct me, is the introduction and the exploration of this new “‐ism” called poetic naturalism, which we'll delve into in the show. But first I just want to point out, I don't know if you've noticed this, but some people on Facebook have already started calling themselves poetic naturalists as their religion. I think that's a pretty clear sign of a successful propagation of a meme. Sean: I'm looking into some sort of uniform that I can wear with a hat and so forth, so I can be the pope of poetic naturalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Sean M. Carroll U 626/568-8473 B [email protected] California Institute of Technology Í
    Caltech MC 452-48 1200 East California Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91125, USA T 626/395-6830 Sean M. Carroll u 626/568-8473 B [email protected] California Institute of Technology Í www.preposterousuniverse.com Current Positions 2006- California Institute of Technology Research Professor (Senior Research Associate, 2006-14) Department of Physics and Walter Burke Institute of Theoretical Physics 2019- Santa Fe Institute External Professor Research Interests Theoretical physics. Quantum spacetime, cosmology, field theory, gravitation, statistical mechanics, emergence and complexity. Philosophy. Foundations of quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics, philosophy of cosmology, emergence, causation, naturalism. Education 1984-1988 Villanova University B.S. Astronomy and Astrophysics, B.A. Honors Program Magna Cum Laude; Minors in Physics, Philosophy 1988-1993 Harvard University Ph.D. Astronomy (George Field, advisor) Thesis: Cosmological Consequences of Topological and Geometric Phenomena in Field Theories Previous Positions 1993-1996 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Postdoctoral Researcher, Center for Theoretical Physics, and Lecturer, Physics 1996-1999 Institute for Theoretical Physics, UC Santa Barbara Postdoctoral Researcher 1999-2006 University of Chicago Assistant Professor, Physics and Enrico Fermi Institute Research Highlights Spacetime I pioneered the study of Lorentz violation through low-energy effective Lagrangians, Symmetries including proposed observational tests [1, 18]. I also proposed some of the first experimen- tal limits on non-commutative modifications of electromagnetism [29], and constraints on dynamical Lorentz-violating fields [35, 45, 52, 53]. I have developed frameworks in which to analyze possible large-scale deviations from cosmological isotropy [44, 46, 48, 50]. Closer to home, I pointed out that average energy is not conserved in quantum measurements, and proposed an experimental test [98].
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Picture, on the Origins of Life, Meaning and the Universe Itself”, by Sean M
    The true big picture on the origins of life and the Universe cannot be found using an atheist worldview by John G. Hartnett ‐‐a review of “The Big Picture, On the Origins of Life, Meaning and the Universe Itself”, by Sean M. Carroll Carroll is a theoretical physicists at the California Institute of Technology. The book is the winner of the 2013 Royal Society Winton Prize for Science Books. Publisher: Oneworld Publications, London, 2016, 470 pages. Preface On the inside book cover these questions are written: Where are we? Who are we? Do our beliefs, hopes and dreams mean anything out there in the void? Can human purpose and meaning ever fit into a scientific worldview? Carroll's message in this book is that there is no ultimate purpose, we are only the product of matter and material forces, there is no meaning to life, there is no afterlife and meaning and purpose do not fit into any scientific worldview. But the author tries to dress it up saying that it’s what you put into your life that counts. Beauty is found in the observer. But he cannot escape his own bondage because his worldview ultimately does not allow for intrinsic meaning or purpose. He is just dead in the end. There is nothing new in this book but a lot of atheistic philosophy stemming from Enlightenment philosopher David Hume. The author uses circular reasoning and begging the question. By assuming there is no Creator because He is not needed in the universe, to cause it or operate within it, and by assuming everything in the past evolution of the universe and life in it is explained by man’s current knowledge (Darwinian evolution by mutation and natural selection) then everything can be explained how it came to be.
    [Show full text]
  • Sublating the Free Will Problematic: Powers, Agency and Causal Determination Ruth Groff
    Sublating the Free Will Problematic: Powers, Agency and Causal Determination Ruth Groff Powers and dispositions are all the rage in contemporary analytic metaphysics.i A key feature of the developing anti-Humean approach is that it reverses the presumed direction of fit between behavior and laws. From a dispositional realist perspective, laws hold in virtue of the powers of given kinds of things to effect given kinds of change, not the other way around. It is not laws, but powers – or, some would say, the bearers of powers – that bring about outcomes. Dispositional realism therefore lends itself to a conception of causality as consisting in the display or expression of powers, rather than as anything amounting to sequences, or statements about sequences, regular or not, counterfactual or not. Finally, unlike for the Humean, for dispositional realists the relationship between what something can potentially do and the kind of thing that it is, is one of necessity. This is not to say that a thing must necessarily express its powersii (let alone that the expression thereof will necessarily issue in an associated effectiii), only that a thing of a given kind bears the powers of its kind necessarily.iv Jointly, these features of dispositional realism stand to radically reconfigure the debate in analytic philosophy over free will. Or so I aim to show. I begin by establishing what the determinism side of the contemporary free will problematic looks like, from a powers perspective, then do the same for a range of issues associated with the free will side. (To be clear, by “side” I do not mean adherents of one or another position; I mean the constituent categories of the conceptual artifice that is the dichotomy between Humean-inflected determinism and Humean-inflected free will.
    [Show full text]