DanceDance ofof thethe :Stars:

AnAn AnalysisAnalysis ofof thethe SpatialSpatial EvolutionEvolution ofof TwoTwo ClustersClusters

Anne Buckner (University of Leeds) & the SFM Collaboration

Image Credit: Wikimedia Commons TalkTalk OutlineOutline

 Stellar Association

 INDICATE A B C  Nebula D

 Upper

StellarStellar AssociationAssociation

● Point processes – intensity – correlation – spatial distribution

StellarStellar AssociationAssociation

● Point processes – intensity – correlation – spatial distribution

Q. How “clustered” are stars?

WhyWhy isis studyingstudying stellarstellar associationassociation important?important?

WhyWhy isis studyingstudying stellarstellar associationassociation important?important?

● Define the distribution and clustering of stars

● Trace morphological features → variation in degree of clustering of stars in regions (as a function of e.g. age, mass, position)

● Discriminate between different modes of Massive SF

MeasuringMeasuring StellarStellar AssociationAssociation

MeasuringMeasuring StellarStellar AssociationAssociation

1. Global measures

MeasuringMeasuring StellarStellar AssociationAssociation

1. Global measures

– 2-point correlation function – Hopkins Statistic

== xx

MeasuringMeasuring StellarStellar AssociationAssociation

1. Global measures

– 2-point correlation function – Hopkins Statistic

2. Local measures

MeasuringMeasuring StellarStellar AssociationAssociation

1. Global measures X X 6 7 X – 2-point correlation function 8 – X X Hopkins Statistic X 5 9 X X 4 2 3 X X 10 11 X X X 18 12 1 X 19 X X 2. Local measures 17 X 13 X 14 16 X – INDICATE 15

INDICATE INdex to Define Inherent Clustering And TEndencies

INDICATE INdex to Define Inherent Clustering And TEndencies

● Local measure of degree of stellar association ● Any parameter space ● 2+D

INDICATE INdex to Define Inherent Clustering And TEndencies

● Local measure of degree of stellar association ● Any parameter space ● 2+D

● Assigns a clustering index to each ● Comparison of number of nearest neighbours with an evenly spaced control field ● Meaningful index values → calibrated against random distributions

INDICATE INdex to Define Inherent Clustering And TEndencies

I = 20/5 = 4 I = 3/5 = 0.6

Carina Nebula

 Typical A ~ 0.5-3 mag v (< 10 mag)

 Age < 6 Myr

 D ~ 2.3 kpc

 M > 105 M .

 130+ OB Stars

Image Credit: Wikipedia/ Harel Boren Khun et al. (2014)

Buckner et al. 2018 (in review) Carina Nebula

Sig level: I > I random + 3σ 5 5

Buckner et al. 2018 (in review) OB Stars

Sig level: I > I random + 3σ 5 5

Buckner et al. 2018 (in review) OB Stars: self-clustering

Sig level: I > I random + 3σ 5 5

Buckner et al. 2018 (in review) OB Stars OB Stars

OB Stars

Buckner et al. 2018 (in review) Upper Scorpius

 Age ~5-10 Myr

 D ~ 145 pc

 OB association

 ~1300 candidate members

Image Credit: WIkipedia Galli et al. 2018 5 I

Buckner et al. 2018 (in prep) Members clustered above random

90 80 70 60 Column B 50 40 30 20 % star's significantly star's % clustered 10 0 All G<12 mag G>12 mag

Index ranges

All

G<12 mag

G>12 mag

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 Buckner et al. 2018 (in prep) I 5 Self-clustering

90

80

70

60 Column B 50

40

30 % star's significantly star's % clustered

20

10

0 G<12 mag G>12 mag

Buckner et al. 2018 (in prep) Summary

 INDICATE → powerful local measure of degree of “clustering” of stars

 2+D, any parameter space

 Trace morphological features in SF regions

 Buckner et al. (2018, A&A, in review)

Image from Pixabay.com Summary

 INDICATE → powerful local measure of degree of “clustering” of stars

 2+D, any parameter space

 Trace morphological features in SF regions

 Buckner et al. (2018, A&A, in review)

 Clustering tendencies in NW and SE regions of Carina different

 More pronounced for OB stars

 No mass segregation in SE region

Image from Pixabay.com Summary

 INDICATE → powerful local measure of degree of “clustering” of stars

 2+D, any parameter space

 Trace morphological features in SF regions

 Buckner et al. (2018, A&A, in review)

 Clustering tendencies in NW and SE regions of Carina different

 More pronounced for OB stars

 No mass segregation in SE region

 Upper Scorpius is centrally concentrated

 Higher mass population more spatially dispersed than lower mass

 Signature of SF history

Image from Pixabay.com