Turning the Battleship
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ma2014-8 Marine Accident Investigation Report
MA2014-8 MARINE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT August 29, 2014 The objective of the investigation conducted by the Japan Transport Safety Board in accordance with the Act for Establishment of the Japan Transport Safety Board is to determine the causes of an accident and damage incidental to such an accident, thereby preventing future accidents and reducing damage. It is not the purpose of the investigation to apportion blame or liability. Norihiro Goto Chairman, Japan Transport Safety Board Note: This report is a translation of the Japanese original investigation report. The text in Japanese shall prevail in the interpretation of the report. MARINE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT Vessel type and name: Container ship BAI CHAY BRIDGE IMO number: 9463346 Gross tonnage: 44,234 tons Vessel type and name: Fishing vessel SEIHOU MARU No. 18 Fishing vessel registration number: KO2-6268 Gross tonnage: 18 tons Accident type: Collision Date and time: At around 23:12 (JST) on January 23, 2013 Location: On a true bearing of approximately 116º and at a distance of 11.4 nautical miles from the Katsuura Lighthouse, Katsuura City, Chiba Prefecture (Approximately 35°03.3'N 140°31.6'E) August 7, 2014 Adopted by the Japan Transport Safety Board Chairman Norihiro Goto Member Tetuo Yokoyama Member Kuniaki Syouji Member Toshiyuki Ishikawa Member Mina Nemoto SYNOPSIS < Summary of the Accident > On January 23, 2013, the container ship BAI CHAY BRIDGE with the master, third officer and 21 other crewmembers on board was proceeding southwestward to Keihin Port, and the fishing vessel SEIHOU MARU No. 18 with the skipper and five other crewmembers on board was proceeding north-northeastward to Choshi Port. -
THE FEASIBLITY of the OVER-THE-HORIZON AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT for U.S. NAVY and MARINE CORPS FORCES a Thesis Presented To
THE FEASIBLITY OF THE OVER-THE-HORIZON AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT FOR U.S. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FORCES A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff Colege in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE STEPHEN L. GOERTZEN, LCDR, USN B.S., U.S. Naval Academy, Annapolis, Maryland, 1982 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 1993 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Name of Candidate: LCDR Stephen L. Goertzen, USN Thesis Title: The Feasibility of the Over-the-Horizon Amphibious Assault for the U.S. Navy and Marine Corps Forces Approved by: u , Thesis Committee Chaiman LTCOL W. A. Sp , Member Accepted this 4th day of June 1993 by: , Director, Graduate Degree Philip J. Brookes, Ph.D. Programs The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to this study should include the foregoing statement.) ABSTRACT THE FEASIBILITY OF THE OVER-THE-HORIZON AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT FOR U.S. NAVY AND MARINE CORPS FORCES: An analysis of the doctrine, equipment, and technology contributing to the feasibility of the over-the-horizon amphibious assault. By Lieutenant Commander Stephen L. Goertzen, USN, 128 pages. This study is an analysis of the tactics,techniques, procedures, doctrine, equipment, and technology utilized in over-the-horizon amphibious assaults. The study examines the issues surrounding current feasibility of the assault, as well as future feasibility of the assault. -
Recommendation for the Application of SOLAS Regulation V/15 No.95
No.95 Recommendation for the Application of SOLAS (Oct 2007) (Corr.1 Regulation V/15 Mar 2009) (Corr.2 Bridge Design, Equipment Arrangement and July 2011) Procedures (BDEAP) Foreword This Recommendation sets forth a set of guidelines for determining compliance with the principles and aims of SOLAS regulation V/15 relating to bridge design, design and arrangement of navigational systems and equipment and bridge procedures when applying the requirements of SOLAS regulations V/19, 22, 24, 25, 27 and 28 at the time of delivery of the newbuilding. The development of this Recommendation has been based on the international regulatory regime and IMO instruments and standards already accepted and referred to by IMO. The platform for the Recommendation is: • the aims specified in SOLAS regulation V/15 for application of SOLAS regulations V/19, 22, 24, 25, 27 and 28 • the content of SOLAS regulations V/19, 22, 24, 25, 27, 28 • applicable parts of MSC/Circ.982, “Guidelines on ergonomic criteria for bridge equipment and layout” • applicable parts of IMO resolutions and performance standards referred to in SOLAS • applicable parts of ISO and IEC standards referred to for information in MSC/Circ.982 • STCW Code • ISM Code This Recommendation is developed to serve as a self-contained document for the understanding and application of the requirements, supported by: • Annex A giving guidance and examples on how the requirements set forth may be met by acceptable technical solutions. The guidance is not regarded mandatory in relation to the requirements and does not in any way exclude alternative solutions that may fulfil the purpose of the requirements. -
1850 Pro Tiller
1850 Pro Tiller Specs Colors GENERAL 1850 PRO TILLER STANDARD Overall Length 18' 6" 5.64 m Summit White base w/Black Metallic accent & Tan interior Boat/Motor/Trailer Length 21' 5" 6.53 m Summit White base w/Blue Flame Boat/Motor/Trailer Width 8' 6" 2.59 m Metallic accent & Tan interior Summit White base w/Red Flame Boat/Motor/Trailer Height 5' 10" 1.78 m Metallic accent & Tan interior Beam 94'' 239 cm Summit White base w/Storm Blue Metallic accent & Tan interior Chine width 78'' 198 cm Summit White base w/Silver Metallic Max. Depth 41'' 104 cm accent & Gray interior Max cockpit depth 22" 56 cm Silver Metallic base w/Black Metallic accent & Gray interior Transom Height 25'' 64 cm Silver Metallic base w/Blue Flame Deadrise 12° Metallic accent & Gray interior Weight (Boat only, dry) 1,375# 624 kg Silver Metallic base w/Red Flame Metallic accent & Gray interior Max. Weight Capacity 1,650# 749 kg Silver Metallic base w/Storm Blue Max. Person Weight Capacity 6 Metallic accent & Gray interior Max. HP Capacity 90 Fuel Capacity 32 gal. 122 L OPTIONAL Mad Fish graphics HULL Shock Effect Wrap Aluminum gauge bottom 0.100" Aluminum gauge sides 0.090'' Aluminum gauge transom 0.125'' Features CONSOLE/INSTRUMENTATION Command console, w/lockable storage & electronics compartment, w/pull-out tray, lockable storage drawer, tackle storage, drink holders (2), gauges, rocker switches & 12V power outlet Fuel gauge Tachometer & voltmeter standard w/pre-rig Master power switch Horn FLOORING Carpet, 16 oz. marine-grade, w/Limited Lifetime Warranty treated panel -
Use of Rudder on Boeing Aircraft
12ADOBL02 December 2011 Use of rudder on Boeing aircraft According to Boeing the Primary uses for rudder input are in crosswind operations, directional control on takeoff or roll out and in the event of engine failure. This Briefing Leaflet was produced in co-operation with Boeing and supersedes the IFALPA document 03SAB001 and applies to all models of the following Boeing aircraft: 707, 717, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, 787, DC-8, DC-9, DC-10, MD-10, md-11, MD-80, MD-90 Sideslip Angle Fig 1: Rudder induced sideslip Background As part of the investigation of the American Airlines Flt 587 crash on Heading Long Island, USA the United States National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) issued a safety recommendation letter which called Flight path for pilots to be made aware that the use of “sequential full opposite rudder inputs can potentially lead to structural loads that exceed those addressed by the requirements of certification”. Aircraft are designed and tested based on certain assumptions of how pilots will use the rudder. These assumptions drive the FAA/EASA, and other certifica- tion bodies, requirements. Consequently, this type of structural failure is rare (with only one event over more than 45 years). However, this information about the characteristics of Boeing aircraft performance in usual circumstances may prove useful. Rudder manoeuvring considerations At the outset it is a good idea to review and consider the rudder and it’s aerodynamic effects. Jet transport aircraft, especially those with wing mounted engines, have large and powerful rudders these are neces- sary to provide sufficient directional control of asymmetric thrust after an engine failure on take-off and provide suitable crosswind capability for both take-off and landing. -
& Marine Engineering
REFERENCE ROOM Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering ft* University of Michigan Ann Arbgr, M g109 THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING Department of Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS AND THE RESISTANCE OF LARGE, TOWED, SEAGOING BARGES J. L. Moss Corning Townsend III Submitted to the SOCIETY OF NAVAL ARCHITECTS AND MARINE ENGINEERS Under p. O. No. 360 September 15, 1967 In the last decade, -ocean-going unmanned barges have become an increasingly important segment of our merchant marine. These vessels, commonly over 400 feet long, and sometimes lifting in excess of 15,000 L.T. dead weight, are usually towed on a long hawser behind a tugboat. Because the barges are inherently directionally unstable, twin out- board skegs are attached to achieve good tracking. Model tests are conducted in order to determine towline resistance and the proper skeg position which renders the barge stable. Skegs, vertical appendages similar to rudders, are placed port and starboard on the rake. They create lift and drag, and move the center of lateral pressure aft, thus tending to stabilize a barge towed on a long line. At The University of Michigan many such model experiments have been conducted within the past several years. Since these tests have been carried out for various industrial con- cerns and on specific designs, systematic variations of parameters or other means of specifically relating the results have not been possible in most cases. Nevertheless, on the basis of the results of these largely unrelated tests, recom- mendations can be made regarding good design practice and some specific aspects can be demonstrated. -
Orientation Sheet for Horizon Updated: 2017-Apr-21
Orientation Sheet for Horizon Updated: 2017-Apr-21 General • All voyages should be documented in the ship’s log book. Report any damage or deficiencies to [email protected] and to boat manager [email protected] / 410-203-2673 Specifications Registration #: MD 5596 AC Hull#: XLY 595267 Make: Islander 36 Year: 1977 Engine: Perkins 4.108; 4-cyl Diesel 48-HP Displacement: 13,450 lbs Draft: 5’ 02” Mast Height Fuel Capacity: 30 gal. Holding tank: 18 gal. (from waterline): 52’ 06” Water Capacity: 54 gal. 2 tanks, below Salon Settees LOA: 36’ 08" Batteries: House battery 1 and 2 (Starboard lazaret) LWL: 28’ 25” Starting Battery (under companionway steps) Beam: 11’ 17” Sails: Main, Genoa on furler, staysail with boom Safety Equipment First Aid Kit: Drawer port side Rescue Sling: Stern Rail PFDs: V-berth Fire Extinguishers: (2) – Starboard side cabin, Port quater berth Day/Night Flares: Aerial & Hand-held – Drawer port side above seats in salon Sounds (Horn, Bell & Whistle): Drawer port side above seats in salon Auto-Switched Bilge Pump: Wired directly to House Battery (must be switched to Auto when leaving boat). The switch is located on the starboard side inside the cabin above the galley sink Old Bilge Pump: Wired to Electric Panel on the engine compartment wall (manual mode only). Do not use this pump unless the other one is not working. Manual Bilge Pump: Cockpit Port side (handle located in drawer port side above seats) Anchors: Danforth (35 lbs) bow; Rode: 15’ of chain & 150’ of line (marked every 30’) Thru-hulls/Sea-cocks: Engine -
IS42 Operator Manual
IS42 Operator Manual ENGLISH www.simrad-yachting.com Preface Disclaimer As Navico is continuously improving this product, we retain the right to make changes to the product at any time which may not be reflected in this version of the manual. Please contact your nearest distributor if you require any further assistance. It is the owner’s sole responsibility to install and use the equipment in a manner that will not cause accidents, personal injury or property damage. The user of this product is solely responsible for observing safe boating practices. NAVICO HOLDING AS AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES, BRANCHES AND AFFILIATES DISCLAIM ALL LIABILITY FOR ANY USE OF THIS PRODUCT IN A WAY THAT MAY CAUSE ACCIDENTS, DAMAGE OR THAT MAY VIOLATE THE LAW. Governing Language: This statement, any instruction manuals, user guides and other information relating to the product (Documentation) may be translated to, or has been translated from, another language (Translation). In the event of any conflict between any Translation of the Documentation, the English language version of the Documentation will be the official version of the Documentation. This manual represents the product as at the time of printing. Navico Holding AS and its subsidiaries, branches and affiliates reserve the right to make changes to specifications without notice. Trademarks Simrad® is used by license from Kongsberg. NMEA® and NMEA 2000® are registered trademarks of the National Marine Electronics Association. Copyright Copyright © 2016 Navico Holding AS. Warranty The warranty card is supplied as a separate document. In case of any queries, refer to the brand website of your display or system: www.simrad-yachting.com. -
Boat Compendium for Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) Inspectors
COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Boat Compendium for Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) Inspectors COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE • 6060 Broadway • Denver, CO 80216 (303) 291-7295 • (303) 297-1192 • www.parks.state.co.us • www.wildlife.state.co.us The purpose of this compendium is to provide guidance to certified boat inspectors and decontaminators on various watercraft often used for recreational boating in Colorado. This book is not inclusive of all boats that inspectors may encounter, but provides detailed information for the majority of watercraft brands and different boat types. Included are the make and models along with the general anatomy of the watercraft, to ensure a successful inspection and/or decontamination to prevent the spread of harmful aquatic nuisance species (ANS). Note: We do not endorse any products or brands pictured or mentioned in this manual. Cover Photo Contest Winner: Cindi Frank, Colorado Parks and Wildlife Crew Leader Granby Reservoir, Shadow Mountain Reservoir and Grand Lake Cover Photo Contest 2nd Place Winner (Photo on Back Cover): Douglas McMillin, BDM Photography Aspen Yacht Club at Ruedi Reservoir Table of Contents Boat Terminology . 2 Marine Propulsion Systems . 6 Alumacraft . 10 Bayliner . 12 Chris-Craft . 15 Fisher . 16 Four Winns . 17 Glastron . 18 Grenada Ballast Tank Sailboats . 19 Hobie Cat . 20 Jetcraft . 21 Kenner . 22 Lund . 23 MacGregor Sailboats . 26 Malibu . 27 MasterCraft . 28 Maxum . 30 Pontoon . 32 Personal Watercraft (PWC) . 34 Ranger . 35 Tracker . 36 Trophy Sportfishing . 37 Wakeboard Ballast Tanks and Bags . 39 Acknowledgements . Inside back cover Boat Compendium for Aquatic Nuisance Species (ANS) Inspectors 1 Boat Terminology aft—In naval terminology, means towards the stern (rear) bow—A nautical term that refers to the forward part of of the boat. -
Touring Rudder Sit-On Top Kit Kit to Fit Rudder Enabled Sit-On Tops with a 10Mm Rudder Fixing Point
touring rudder sit-on top kit Kit to fit rudder enabled sit-on tops with a 10mm rudder fixing point. Note: It is easier to fit the Touring Rudder System if you have a screw hatch fitted to the rear stowage area of the kayak. If your kayak does not have this screw hatch and you wish to fit one, please contact a Perception dealer for advice. These instructions explain how to fit the rudder kit to a kayak with or without a rear screw hatch in place. Please make sure you follow the correct steps for your version of sit-on top kayak. This kit should contain the following: 1x rudder assembly with up-haul rope & split ring 4x deck fittings 4x length of rudder hose 5x self tapping screws 2x Dyneema control line - with cord end assembly 2x oval toggle 1x pair of Tip-Toes control footrests with foam washers 1x length of 4mm shock cord 6x footrest screws, washers and nuts - pre-fitted 1x rudder park - inc. hook, shock cord & fixing block You will also require some tools to fit this kit: Drill with 3mm, 5mm and 6mm drill bits Marker pen Short phillips screwdriver Wire cutters Small adjustable spanner or pair of pliers Lighter Tape measure Small amount of sticky tape Please read these instructions carefully before fitting! Step 1 - Control line entry points The rudder will need to have two control lines attached, each one running through hose sections inside the kayak from the rudder to the Tip-Toes footrests. This kit has four hose sections (two pairs) as two sections are needed per control line. -
Gannet Electronics
Gannet Electronics A Summary of the Electronic Equipment Fitted to early Model R.A.N Gannet A.S.1 Aircraft Prepared by David Mowat Ex-L.R.E.M.(A) 21st. August 2003 Page 1 Page 2 GANNET ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT Introduction The ‘Heart’ of the Gannet as a Weapons System was its Electronic Equipment. It contained a comprehensive range of electronic equipment to enable it to perform the various roles for which it was designed. Its Primary Role was to detect, locate, and destroy enemy submarines. For this Role, the Aircraft was fitted with a Search Radar and Sonobuoy Systems. Other electronic systems were also installed for Communications, both internal and external, and Navigation. The various equipments were allocated an ‘Aircraft Radio Installation’ (ARI) number, which specified the actual equipment used in each installation. These may vary between aircraft depending on the role that the particular aircraft was to perform. A cross- reference List of ARI’s is shown at Appendix ‘A’. The various equipments can be grouped into four major categories as follows: a.! Communications b.! Navigation c.! Warfare Systems d.! Stores Communications Equipment The Communications Equipment was used to enable the crew to talk to each other (internal communications) and other aircraft, ships or bases (external communications). They are as follows: a.! Audio Amplifier Type A1961 The Type A1921 was used to amplify the Microphone outputs from the three crew members and feed it back into the earphones. It was located on the port side of the rear cockpit at about seat height just forward of the Radio Operator. -
December 2007 Crew Journal of the Barque James Craig
December 2007 Crew journal of the barque James Craig Full & By December 2007 Full & By The crew journal of the barque James Craig http://www.australianheritagefleet.com.au/JCraig/JCraig.html Compiled by Peter Davey [email protected] Production and photos by John Spiers All crew and others associated with the James Craig are very welcome to submit material. The opinions expressed in this journal may not necessarily be the viewpoint of the Sydney Maritime Museum, the Sydney Heritage Fleet or the crew of the James Craig or its officers. 2 December 2007 Full & By APEC parade of sail - Windeward Bound, New Endeavour, James Craig, Endeavour replica, One and All Full & By December 2007 December 2007 Full & By Full & By December 2007 December 2007 Full & By Full & By December 2007 7 Radio procedures on James Craig adio procedures being used onboard discomfort. Effective communication Rare from professional to appalling relies on message being concise and clear. - mostly on the appalling side. The radio Consider carefully what is to be said before intercoms are not mobile phones. beginning to transmit. Other operators may The ship, and the ship’s company are be waiting to use the network. judged by our appearance and our radio procedures. Remember you may have Some standard words and phases. to justify your transmission to a marine Affirm - Yes, or correct, or that is cor- court of inquiry. All radio transmissions rect. or I agree on VHF Port working frequencies are Negative - No, or this is incorrect or monitored and tape recorded by the Port Permission not granted.