DOCSLIB.ORG

Part 226—Designated Critical Habitat

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Part 226—Designated Critical Habitat National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce Pt. 226 [73 FR 60187, Oct. 10, 2008] 226.206 Critical habitat for the Southern Resident killer whale (Orcinus orca). EFFECTIVE DATE NOTE: 73 FR 60187, Oct. 10, 226.207 Critical habitat for leatherback tur- 2008, § 224.105 was added, effective Dec. 9, 2008 tle. through Dec. 9, 2013. 226.208 Critical habitat for green turtle. 226.209 Critical habitat for hawksbill turtle. PART 225 [RESERVED] 226.210 Central California Coast Coho Salm- on (Oncorhynchus kisutch), Southern Or- egon/Northern California Coasts Coho PART 226—DESIGNATED CRITICAL Salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch). HABITAT 226.211 Critical habitat for Seven Evolutionarily Significant Units (ESUs) Sec. of Salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) in Cali- fornia. 226.101 Purpose and scope. 226.212 Critical habitat for 12 Evolutionarily 226.201 Critical habitat for Hawaiian monk Significant Units (ESUs) of salmon and seals. steelhead (Oncorhynchus spp.) in Wash- 226.202 Critical habitat for Steller sea lions. ington, Oregon and Idaho. 226.203 Critical habitat for northern right 226.213 Critical habitat for Johnson’s whales. seagrass. 226.204 Critical habitat for Sacramento win- 226.214 Critical habitat for Gulf sturgeon. ter-run chinook salmon. 226.215 Critical habitat for the North Pa- 226.205 Critical habitat for Snake River cific Right Whale (Eubalaena japonica). sockeye salmon, Snake River fall chi- 226.216 Critical habitat for elkhorn nook salmon, and Snake River spring/ (Acropora palmata) and staghorn (A. summer chinook salmon. cervicornis) corals. 317 VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:56 Nov 25, 2009 Jkt 217227 PO 00000 Frm 00327 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\217227.XXX 217227 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with CFR ER10OC08.038</GPH> § 226.101 50 CFR Ch. II (10–1–09 Edition) 226.217 Critical habitat for the Gulf of ter, if endangered. For regulations per- Maine Distinct Population Segment of taining to the designation of critical Atlantic Salmon (Salmo salar). habitat, see part 424 of this title, and 226.218 Critical habitat for the U.S. DPS of for regulations pertaining to prohibi- smalltooth sawfish (Pristis pectinata). tions against the adverse modification TABLE 1 TO PART 226—MAJOR STELLER SEA or destruction of critical habitat, see LION ROOKERY SITES TABLE 2 TO PART 226—MAJOR STELLER SEA part 402 of this title. Maps and charts LION HAULOUT SITES IN ALASKA identifying designated critical habitat TABLE 3 TO PART 226—HYDROLOGIC UNITS that are not provided in this section CONTAINING CRITICAL HABITAT FOR SNAKE may be obtained upon request to the RIVER SOCKEYE SALMON AND SNAKE RIVER Office of Protected Resources (see SPRING/SUMMER AND FALL CHINOOK SALM- § 222.102, definition of ‘‘Office of Pro- ON tected Resources’’). TABLE 4 TO PART 226 [RESERVED] TABLE 5 TO PART 226—HYDROLOGIC UNITS AND [64 FR 14067, Mar. 23, 1999] COUNTIES CONTAINING CRITICAL HABITAT FOR CENTRAL CALIFORNIA COAST COHO § 226.201 Critical habitat for Hawaiian SALMON, TRIBAL LANDS WITHIN THE monk seals. RANGE OF THE ESU, AND DAMS/RES- ERVOIRS REPRESENTING THE UPSTREAM HAWAIIAN MONK SEAL EXTENT OF CRITICAL HABITAT TABLE 6 TO PART 226—HYDROLOGIC UNITS AND (Monachus schauinslandi) COUNTIES CONTAINING CRITICAL HABITAT FOR SOUTHERN OREGON/NORTHERN CALI- All beach areas, sand spits and islets, FORNIA COASTS COHO SALMON, TRIBAL including all beach crest vegetation to LANDS WITHIN THE RANGE OF THE ESU, its deepest extent inland, lagoon wa- AND DAMS/RESERVOIRS REPRESENTING THE ters, inner reef waters, and ocean wa- UPSTREAM EXTENT OF CRITICAL HABITAT ters out to a depth of 20 fathoms AUTHORITY: 16 U.S.C. 1533. around the following: § 226.101 Purpose and scope. Kure Atoll (28°24′ N, 178°20′ W) The regulations contained in this Midway Islands, except Sand Island and its harbor (28°14′ N, 177°22′ W) part identify those habitats designated Pearl and Hermes Reef (27°55′ N, 175° W) by the Secretary of Commerce as crit- Lisianski Island (26°46′ N, 173°58′ W) ical under section 4 of the Act, for en- Laysan Island (25°46′ N, 171°44′ W) dangered and threatened species under Maro Reef (25°25′ N, 170°35′ W) the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Gardner Pinnacles (25°00′ N, 168°00′ W) Commerce. Those species are enumer- French Frigate Shoals (23°45′ N, 166°00′ W) ated at § 223.102 of this chapter, if Necker Island (23°34′ N, 164°42′ W) threatened and at § 224.101 of this chap- Nihoa Island (23°03.5′ N, 161°55.5′ W). 318 VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:56 Nov 25, 2009 Jkt 217227 PO 00000 Frm 00328 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8010 Y:\SGML\217227.XXX 217227 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with CFR National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.201 319 VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:56 Nov 25, 2009 Jkt 217227 PO 00000 Frm 00329 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8006 Y:\SGML\217227.XXX 217227 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with CFR EC01JY91.000</GPH> § 226.201 50 CFR Ch. II (10–1–09 Edition) 320 VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:56 Nov 25, 2009 Jkt 217227 PO 00000 Frm 00330 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8006 Y:\SGML\217227.XXX 217227 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with CFR EC01JY91.001</GPH> National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.201 321 VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:56 Nov 25, 2009 Jkt 217227 PO 00000 Frm 00331 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8006 Y:\SGML\217227.XXX 217227 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with CFR EC01JY91.002</GPH> § 226.201 50 CFR Ch. II (10–1–09 Edition) 322 VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:56 Nov 25, 2009 Jkt 217227 PO 00000 Frm 00332 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8006 Y:\SGML\217227.XXX 217227 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with CFR EC01JY91.003</GPH> National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.201 323 VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:56 Nov 25, 2009 Jkt 217227 PO 00000 Frm 00333 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8006 Y:\SGML\217227.XXX 217227 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with CFR EC01JY91.004</GPH> § 226.201 50 CFR Ch. II (10–1–09 Edition) 324 VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:56 Nov 25, 2009 Jkt 217227 PO 00000 Frm 00334 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8006 Y:\SGML\217227.XXX 217227 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with CFR EC01JY91.005</GPH> National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.201 325 VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:56 Nov 25, 2009 Jkt 217227 PO 00000 Frm 00335 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8006 Y:\SGML\217227.XXX 217227 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with CFR EC01JY91.006</GPH> § 226.201 50 CFR Ch. II (10–1–09 Edition) [53 FR 18990, May 26, 1988. Redesignated at 64 FR 14067, Mar. 23, 1999] 326 VerDate Nov<24>2008 10:56 Nov 25, 2009 Jkt 217227 PO 00000 Frm 00336 Fmt 8010 Sfmt 8016 Y:\SGML\217227.XXX 217227 wwoods2 on DSK1DXX6B1PROD with CFR EC01JY91.007</GPH> National Marine Fisheries Service/NOAA, Commerce § 226.203 § 226.202 Critical habitat for Stellar lands (connected by the shortest lines); sea lions. bounded on the west by a line con- necting Cape Kumlik (56°38″/157°27′W) STELLER SEA LION (Eumetopias jubatus) and the southwestern tip of Tugidak Is- ° ′ ° ′ (a) Alaska rookeries, haulouts, and as- land (56 24 N/154 41 W) and bounded in sociated areas. In Alaska, all major the east by a line connecting Cape ° ′ ° ′ Steller sea lion rookeries identified in Douglas (58 51 N/153 15 W) and the Table 1 and major haulouts identified northernmost tip of Shuyak Island ° ′ ° ′ in Table 2 and associated terrestrial, (58 37 N/152 22 W). air, and aquatic zones. Critical habitat (2) Critical habitat includes the includes a terrestrial zone that extends Bogoslof area in the Bering Sea shelf 3,000 feet (0.9 km) landward from the and consists of the area between ° ′ ° ′ baseline or base point of each major 170 00 W and 164 00 W, south of straight ° ′ ° ′ rookery and major haulout in Alaska. lines connecting 55 00 N/170 00 W and ° ′ ° ′ ° ′ ° ′ Critical habitat includes an air zone 55 00 N/168 00 W; 55 30 N/168 00 W and ° ′ ° ′ ° ′ ° ′ that extends 3,000 feet (0.9 km) above 55 30 N/166 00 W; 56 00 N/166 00 W and ° ′ ° ′ the terrestrial zone of each major rook- 56 00 N/164 00 W and north of the Aleu- ery and major haulout in Alaska, tian Islands and straight lines between measured vertically from sea level. the islands connecting the following Critical habitat includes an aquatic coordinates in the order listed: zone that extends 3,000 feet (0.9 km) 52°49.2′N/169°40.4′W ° ′ ° ′ seaward in State and Federally man- 52 49.8 N/169 06.3 W 53°23.8′N/167°50.1′W aged waters from the baseline or 53°18.7′N/167°51.4′W basepoint of each major rookery and 53°59.0′N/166°17.2′W major haulout in Alaska that is east of 54°02.9′N/166°03.0′W 144° W. longitude. Critical habitat in- 54°07.7′N/165°40.6′W cludes an aquatic zone that extends 20 54°08.9′N/165°38.8′W ° ′ ° ′ nm (37 km) seaward in State and Fed- 54 11.9 N/165 23.3 W 54°23.9′N/164°44.0′W erally managed waters from the base- line or basepoint of each major rookery (3) Critical habitat includes the and major haulout in Alaska that is Seguam Pass area and consists of the west of 144° W. longitude. area between 52°00′N and 53°00′N and be- (b) California and Oregon rookeries and tween 173°30′W and 172°30′W. associated areas. In California and Or- [58 FR 45278, Aug.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Regional Open Space District (District) Completed the Bid Process on Wednesday June 17, 2015 with Half Moon Bay Grading and Paving As the Apparent Low Bidder
    R-15-89 Meeting 15-16 June 24, 2015 AGENDA ITEM 3 AGENDA ITEM Contract to Implement the Driscoll Ranch Roads Sediment Reduction and Pond Restoration Project at the La Honda Creek Open Space Preserve. GENERAL MANAGER’S RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Authorize the General Manager to enter into an agreement with Half Moon Bay Grading and Paving of Half Moon Bay, CA, for a total contract amount not to exceed $613,566, which includes the project proposal amount of $533,536 and a fifteen percent contingency amount of $80,030, to implement the Driscoll Ranch Roads Sediment Reduction and Pond Restoration Project at the La Honda Creek Open Space Preserve. 2. Determine that the recommended action is consistent with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Plan for Implementation of the La Honda Creek Master Plan, approved by the Board on August 22, 2012. SUMMARY The Request for Bids for the Driscoll Ranch Roads Sediment Reduction and Pond Restoration Project (Project) was released on May 20, 2015. Midpeninsula Regional Open Space District (District) completed the bid process on Wednesday June 17, 2015 with Half Moon Bay Grading and Paving as the apparent low bidder. This project was previously brought before the Board on May 14, 2014 (See R-14-77) to authorize the District to enter into a grant agreement through the Fisheries Restoration Grant Program with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) to help fund this important sediment reduction and habitat restoration work. The District has been awarded this grant, which will fund $230,970 of the project construction costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Taylors Hill-Werribee South Sunbury-Gisborne Hurstbridge-Lilydale Wandin East-Cockatoo Pakenham-Mornington South West
    TAYLORS HILL-WERRIBEE SOUTH SUNBURY-GISBORNE HURSTBRIDGE-LILYDALE WANDIN EAST-COCKATOO PAKENHAM-MORNINGTON SOUTH WEST Metro/Country Postcode Suburb Metro 3200 Frankston North Metro 3201 Carrum Downs Metro 3202 Heatherton Metro 3204 Bentleigh, McKinnon, Ormond Metro 3205 South Melbourne Metro 3206 Albert Park, Middle Park Metro 3207 Port Melbourne Country 3211 LiQle River Country 3212 Avalon, Lara, Point Wilson Country 3214 Corio, Norlane, North Shore Country 3215 Bell Park, Bell Post Hill, Drumcondra, Hamlyn Heights, North Geelong, Rippleside Country 3216 Belmont, Freshwater Creek, Grovedale, Highton, Marhsall, Mt Dunede, Wandana Heights, Waurn Ponds Country 3217 Deakin University - Geelong Country 3218 Geelong West, Herne Hill, Manifold Heights Country 3219 Breakwater, East Geelong, Newcomb, St Albans Park, Thomson, Whington Country 3220 Geelong, Newtown, South Geelong Anakie, Barrabool, Batesford, Bellarine, Ceres, Fyansford, Geelong MC, Gnarwarry, Grey River, KenneQ River, Lovely Banks, Moolap, Moorabool, Murgheboluc, Seperaon Creek, Country 3221 Staughtonvale, Stone Haven, Sugarloaf, Wallington, Wongarra, Wye River Country 3222 Clilon Springs, Curlewis, Drysdale, Mannerim, Marcus Hill Country 3223 Indented Head, Port Arlington, St Leonards Country 3224 Leopold Country 3225 Point Lonsdale, Queenscliffe, Swan Bay, Swan Island Country 3226 Ocean Grove Country 3227 Barwon Heads, Breamlea, Connewarre Country 3228 Bellbrae, Bells Beach, jan Juc, Torquay Country 3230 Anglesea Country 3231 Airleys Inlet, Big Hill, Eastern View, Fairhaven, Moggs
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Sonoma County Stormwater Resources Plan Evaluation Process
    Appendix A List of Stakeholders Engaged APPENDIX A List of Stakeholders Engaged Specific audiences engaged in the planning process are identified below. These audiences include: cities, government officials, landowners, public land managers, locally regulated commercial, agricultural and industrial stakeholders, non-governmental organizations, mosquito and vector control districts and the general public. TABLE 1 LIST OF STAKEHOLDERS ENGAGED Organization Type Watershed 1st District Supervisor Government Sonoma 5th District Supervisor Government Petaluma City of Petaluma Government Petaluma City of Sonoma Government Sonoma Daily Acts Non-Governmental Petaluma Friends of the Petaluma River Non-Governmental Petaluma Zone 2A Petaluma River Watershed- Flood Control Government Petaluma Advisory Committee Zone 3A Valley of the Moon - Flood Control Advisory Government Sonoma Committee Marin Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District Special District Both Sonoma Ecology Center Non-Governmental Sonoma Sonoma County Regional Parks Government Both Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Government Both Space District Sonoma Land Trust Non-Governmental Both Sonoma County Transportation and Public Works Government Both Valley of the Moon Water District Government Sonoma Sonoma Resource Conservation District Special District Both Sonoma County Permit Sonoma Government Both Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Non-Governmental N/A California State Parks Government Both California State Water Resources Control Board Government N/A Southern Sonoma
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County
    Steelhead/rainbow trout resources of San Mateo County San Pedro San Pedro Creek flows northwesterly, entering the Pacific Ocean at Pacifica State Beach. It drains a watershed about eight square miles in area. The upper portions of the drainage contain springs (feeding the south and middle forks) that produce perennial flow in the creek. Documents with information regarding steelhead in the San Pedro Creek watershed may refer to the North Fork San Pedro Creek and the Sanchez Fork. For purposes of this report, these tributaries are considered as part of the mainstem. A 1912 letter regarding San Mateo County streams indicates that San Pedro Creek was stocked. A fishway also is noted on the creek (Smith 1912). Titus et al. (in prep.) note DFG records of steelhead spawning in the creek in 1941. In 1968, DFG staff estimated that the San Pedro Creek steelhead run consisted of 100 individuals (Wood 1968). A 1973 stream survey report notes, “Spawning habitat is a limiting factor for steelhead” (DFG 1973a, p. 2). The report called the steelhead resources of San Pedro Creek “viable and important” but cited passage at culverts, summer water diversion, and urbanization effects on the stream channel and watershed hydrology as placing “the long-term survival of the steelhead resource in question”(DFG 1973a, p. 5). The lower portions of San Pedro Creek were surveyed during the spring and summer of 1989. Three O. mykiss year classes were observed during the study throughout the lower creek. Researchers noticed “a marked exodus from the lower creek during the late summer” of yearling and age 2+ individuals, many of which showed “typical smolt characteristics” (Sullivan 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 10. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit—Upper Columbia River Basins Critical Habitat Unit
    Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification: Rationale for Why Habitat is Essential, and Documentation of Occupancy Chapter 10. Mid-Columbia Recovery Unit—Upper Columbia River Basins Critical Habitat Unit 10.1 Methow River Critical Habitat Subunit ....................................................................... 325 10.2. Chelan River Critical Habitat Subunit ......................................................................... 337 10.3. Entiat River Critical Habitat Subunit ........................................................................... 341 10.4. Wenatchee River Critical Habitat Subunit ................................................................... 345 323 Bull Trout Final Critical Habitat Justification Chapter 10 U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service September 2010 Chapter 10. Upper Columbia River Basins Critical Habitat Unit The Upper Columbia River Basins CHU includes the entire drainages of three CHSUs in central and north-central Washington on the east slopes of the Cascade Range and east of the Columbia River between Wenatchee, Washington, and the Okanogan River drainage: (1) Wenatchee River CHSU in Chelan County; (2) Entiat River CHSU in Chelan County; and (3) Methow River CHSU in Okanogan County. The Upper Columbia River Basins CHU also includes the Lake Chelan and Okanogan basins which historically provided spawning and rearing and FMO habitat and currently the Chelan Basin is essential and provides for FMO habitat to support migratory bull trout in this CHU. No critical habitat is proposed in the Okanogan River at this time. Bull trout have been recently observed in the Okanogan River near Osoyoos Lake, but it is unclear if it is essential habitat and what role this drainage may play in recovery. A total of 1,074.9 km (667.9 mi) of streams and 1,033.2 ha (2,553.1 ac) of lake surface area in this CHU are proposed as critical habitat to provide for spawning and rearing, FMO habitat to support three core areas essential for conservation and recovery.
    [Show full text]
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
    [Show full text]
  • SAN GREGORIO CREEK STREAM SYSTEM ) 12 ) in San Mateo County, California ) 13 ------) 14
    (ENDORSED) 1 WILLIAM R. ATTWATER, Chief Counsel ANDREW H. SAWYER, Assistant Chief Counsel 2 M. G. TAYLOR, III, Senior Staff Counsel FILED • BARBARA A. KATZ, Staff Counsel JAN 2 9 1993 3 901 P Street WARREN SLOCUM, County C!cri( Sacramento, California 95814 j:,\!l;.l"'if' ",.,;;."""" ''­ :':y , J:.;i";J 1 "~1."""....ii, ..': .. ;• .'.~ 4 Telephone: (916) 657 -209 7 • C'EPu;Y C~:~~~~ 5 Attorneys for the State Water Resources Control Board 6 7 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 8 COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 9 In the Matter of the ) No. 355792 Determination of the Rights of ) 10 the various Claimants to the ) DECREE Water of ) 11 ) SAN GREGORIO CREEK STREAM SYSTEM ) 12 ) in San Mateo County, California ) 13 ------------------------------) 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 • 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................. i . , , 4 INDEX OF CLAIMANTS ........................................... iii " 5 Defini tions ............................................. 2 6 State Water Resources Control Board Map ................. 4 7 General. Entitlement ..................................... 4 8 Priori ty of Rights ...................................... 5 9 Post-1914 Appropriations ................................ 6 10 Seasons of Use .......................................... 7 11 Domestic Use ............................................ 7 12 S tockwa tering Use ....................................... 7 13 Irrigation Use .......................................... 8 14 Domestic and Stockwatering Uses During
    [Show full text]
  • MAJOR STREAMS in SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000
    MAJOR STREAMS IN SONOMA COUNTY March 1, 2000 Bill Cox District Fishery Biologist Sonoma / Marin Gualala River 234 North Fork Gualala River 34 Big Pepperwood Creek 34 Rockpile Creek 34 Buckeye Creek 34 Francini Creek 23 Soda Springs Creek 34 Little Creek North Fork Buckeye Creek Osser Creek 3 Roy Creek 3 Flatridge Creek 3 South Fork Gualala River 32 Marshall Creek 234 Sproul Creek 34 Wild Cattle Canyon Creek 34 McKenzie Creek 34 Wheatfield Fork Gualala River 3 Fuller Creek 234 Boyd Creek 3 Sullivan Creek 3 North Fork Fuller Creek 23 South Fork Fuller Creek 23 Haupt Creek 234 Tobacco Creek 3 Elk Creek House Creek 34 Soda Spring Creek Allen Creek Pepperwood Creek 34 Danfield Creek 34 Cow Creek Jim Creek 34 Grasshopper Creek Britain Creek 3 Cedar Creek 3 Wolf Creek 3 Tombs Creek 3 Sugar Loaf Creek 3 Deadman Gulch Cannon Gulch Chinese Gulch Phillips Gulch Miller Creek 3 Warren Creek Wildcat Creek Stockhoff Creek 3 Timber Cove Creek Kohlmer Gulch 3 Fort Ross Creek 234 Russian Gulch 234 East Branch Russian Gulch 234 Middle Branch Russian Gulch 234 West Branch Russian Gulch 34 Russian River 31 Jenner Creek 3 Willow Creek 134 Sheephouse Creek 13 Orrs Creek Freezeout Creek 23 Austin Creek 235 Kohute Gulch 23 Kidd Creek 23 East Austin Creek 235 Black Rock Creek 3 Gilliam Creek 23 Schoolhouse Creek 3 Thompson Creek 3 Gray Creek 3 Lawhead Creek Devils Creek 3 Conshea Creek 3 Tiny Creek Sulphur Creek 3 Ward Creek 13 Big Oat Creek 3 Blue Jay 3 Pole Mountain Creek 3 Bear Pen Creek 3 Red Slide Creek 23 Dutch Bill Creek 234 Lancel Creek 3 N.F.
    [Show full text]
  • 1:100,000 1 Inch = 1.6 Miles Central Idaho-01
    R 10 E R 11 E 115°7'30"W R 12 E 115°W R 13 E 114°52'30"W R 14 E 114°45'W R 15 E 114°37'30"W R 16 E 114°30'W R 17 E 114°22'30"W R 18 E S k i k e l v e Joe Jump Basin e Lookout Mountain k La e e r st e r r k C k e R C e h ee r C e e Little a Cr u Iron Cre k nce C l h r w Airport Rd e Car c C Central Idaho-01 e bo n an k B liv o t C nat e l e d e r u k i a r C e a g l C e F S r r e e e e S e C a M M C k e t s r a k o in a C a G o Creek s th rc in k i o m o e C Fire Suppression Constraints e S re C r k y e r k e e C m re e ek n m C e k i r r Alpine Peak o Ziegler Basin t Fish Critical Habitats T 10 N a C Observation Peak J e an s B g je T 10 N n d i Jimmy Smith Lake n v i ulch Bull Trout Critical Habitat a G r Hoodoo Lake L k rry k Creek ake Cree he G Big L Big Lake Creek 222 e Lake C Grandjean e Big Balsam Rd r k Trailer Lakes Regan, Mount C e Spawning Areas of Concern Little Redfish Lake e ry r S a C ek 222 F re Trail Creek Lakes d o o C n c rk l u r Resource Avoidance Area 36 P i 36 o a ra Big Lake Creek a Williams Peak B M ye T NF-214 Rd tte 31 31 36 31 31 36 31 Ri Cleveland Creek Safety Concerns ve 36 Wapiti Creek Rd r EAST FORK 36 S a l Suppression tactics Avoidance Area 01 Thompson Peak m o Railroad Ridge n Crater Lake 06 01 R Bluett Creek D Misc Resource Areas i ry 06 01 k v 01 01 06 06 Gu 01 06 k e e lc e re h e C r k r k k e Meadows, The C e oo re Watson Peak im Creek x Wilderness Area e hh C Iron Basin J o r Fis old Chinese Wall ek F C G re ti C Bluett Creek i Slate Creek r Retardant Avoidance Area p Gunsight Lake e a ld W ou B
    [Show full text]
  • San Mateo County Watershed Data in a GIS
    San Mateo County Watershed Data in a GIS Introduction The San Mateo Countywide Water Pollution Prevention Program (Program) performs Watershed Assessment and Monitoring (WAM) component activities in compliance with its municipal stormwater NPDES permit requirements. In the past, a consistent countywide watershed boundary data layer has not been available to meet Program needs for mapping and analyzing watershed-related data. As a result, the Program has previously utilized the best existing available data sets and/or developed new data to meet the objectives of specific individual projects. For example, creek location and watershed boundary data were developed to characterize imperviousness and channel modifications in seventeen watersheds in San Mateo County (STOPPP 2002). In another example, Program staff compiled existing countywide watershed data and developed new data needed to identify watershed areas considered exempt from Hydromodification Management Plan (HMP) requirements (STOPPP 2005). The Program previously identified two major information gaps in digital watershed boundary data: 1) limited storm drain catchment data were available for urban areas and 2) consistent countywide watershed data layers were not available (STOPPP 2005). Recent development of watershed data in urbanized portions of San Mateo County has provided an opportunity to address these information gaps. This memo describes the methods used by Program staff to create a consistent countywide watershed data layer that includes delineation of storm drain catchments in urban areas. Consistent watershed and creek data set will assist Program staff in watershed characterization and the identification and prioritization of potential future monitoring and watershed assessment activities. Background In 1999, the State of California developed a statewide watershed data layer entitled the California Interagency Watershed Map (Calwater).
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGIC MAP of the CHELAN 30-MINUTE by 60-MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON by R
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR TO ACCOMPANY MAP I-1661 U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE CHELAN 30-MINUTE BY 60-MINUTE QUADRANGLE, WASHINGTON By R. W. Tabor, V. A. Frizzell, Jr., J. T. Whetten, R. B. Waitt, D. A. Swanson, G. R. Byerly, D. B. Booth, M. J. Hetherington, and R. E. Zartman INTRODUCTION Bedrock of the Chelan 1:100,000 quadrangle displays a long and varied geologic history (fig. 1). Pioneer geologic work in the quadrangle began with Bailey Willis (1887, 1903) and I. C. Russell (1893, 1900). A. C. Waters (1930, 1932, 1938) made the first definitive geologic studies in the area (fig. 2). He mapped and described the metamorphic rocks and the lavas of the Columbia River Basalt Group in the vicinity of Chelan as well as the arkoses within the Chiwaukum graben (fig. 1). B. M. Page (1939a, b) detailed much of the structure and petrology of the metamorphic and igneous rocks in the Chiwaukum Mountains, further described the arkoses, and, for the first time, defined the alpine glacial stages in the area. C. L. Willis (1950, 1953) was the first to recognize the Chiwaukum graben, one of the more significant structural features of the region. The pre-Tertiary schists and gneisses are continuous with rocks to the north included in the Skagit Metamorphic Suite of Misch (1966, p. 102-103). Peter Misch and his students established a framework of North Cascade metamorphic geology which underlies much of our construct, especially in the western part of the quadrangle. Our work began in 1975 and was essentially completed in 1980.
    [Show full text]