DOCSLIB.ORG

Report of the Independent Review Into the Tasmanian Floods of June and July 2016

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report of the Independent Review Into the Tasmanian Floods of June and July 2016 Report of the Independent Review into the Tasmanian Floods of June and July 2016 Shared responsibility, resilience and adaptation June 2017 This page is intentionally blank 1 June 2017 Honourable Rene Hidding Minister for Police, Fire and Emergency Management Level One, Franklin Square Hobart TAS 7000 Dear Minister, Independent Review into the Tasmanian Floods of June and July 2016 I attach my Report into the above. Yours faithfully Mike Blake Lead Investigator Foreword In this report of my Review of the Tasmanian Floods of June and July 2016 I note that, “… during this event it didn’t just rain: the rain experienced was extreme in the Tasmanian context and so the fact that it led to flooding was not just unsurprising, it was to be expected. These totals, that would be significant in any environment, were particularly so for Tasmania.” Also most evident was the need for me, as my team and I went about our work, to be very conscious of the benefits of hindsight and to regularly pose the question – “how might I have responded to these incidents at the time?” Perhaps in answering this question as we went along, I observed examples of entities that had learnt more from past experiences than may have others. While I am not saying this happened on this occasion, there is a risk with natural hazards like floods, that communities and emergency authorities forget when floods do not occur for many years, resulting in lower awareness and preparedness. Communities change and age and perhaps forget. We need systems that regularly test and constantly remind all of us without being alarming. Much good work is done both nationally and in Tasmania on natural hazard risk assessments and, in doing so, there were high levels of engagement between numerous relevant parties. Less effective was communication of these risks, and actions needed, with communities, although an exception to this is how our State has recently managed fire risks. There is much that our fire services can share with other emergency services authorities although always remembering that fire is, currently, more frequent. I was surprised by the very high costs associated with floods and by finding that floods are not infrequent in Tasmania. Also noted from more than one authoritative source was the view that Australia as a nation, and I suspect this similarly applies to Tasmania, underinvests in natural disaster mitigation. Government1 and local authorities need to examine and address this. This Review identified many emergency management related reviews occurring and completed in recent years in Tasmania and nationally. Submissions made to us identified many good suggestions. Government and local governments are urged to review these ideas and to invest resources in addressing them. Hopefully some suggestions will be addressed by proposed planning laws which, at the time of preparing this Report, have still to be finalised. However, it is not just the State (collectively Government and local governments) that needs to have regard to risks associated with flood and other hazardous events. We all must. We have a shared responsibility in doing this. So, when advice is provided, or training offered, by our emergency management authorities, we all need to listen and, when relevant, take up opportunities offered to learn so as to be more aware, better prepared and to build our collective resilience. This is particularly so as the make-up of our communities and businesses change. With floods in mind, perhaps what is also needed is heightened awareness when flood watch notices are issued by the Bureau of Meteorology rather than waiting for flood warnings. 1 Throughout this Report Government refers to the Tasmanian Government unless specified otherwise. Report of the Independent Review into the Tasmanian Floods of June and July 2016 Page i Finally, and I raise this with no particular view about the causes, perhaps greater attention may be needed to agencies we establish or why bother to set them up? I refer to agencies like the Tasmanian Climate Change Office. Its research indicates temperatures will rise and rainfall will remain unchanged but there will be more intense rainfall events. The implications of this research need to be considered for the benefit of all Tasmanians. It is incumbent on emergency management authorities to work together more to better inform all Tasmanian communities about the dangers of floods, in which parts of the State flood risk is the highest and how we can all, not just governments, better prepare. Without this, there is a real risk that the June 2016 experience will be forgotten. Some councils clearly demonstrated what they had learnt from past events; it is up to all of us similarly to do so. I acknowledge and thank my Review Team members, Mr Paul Considine from the National Aerial Firefighting Centre in Melbourne and Inspector Brian Edmonds of Tasmania Police, for their expert emergency management advice, experience and insights. Also thanked are each of the 54 submitters to this Review and the many parties we interviewed and engaged with during our work; your views and suggestions were in all instances helpful. Mike Blake Lead Investigator 1 June 2017 Report of the Independent Review into the Tasmanian Floods of June and July 2016 Page ii Contents Foreword ........................................................................................................................................... i Executive summary ............................................................................................................................. 1 Background ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Terms of Reference ............................................................................................................................... 1 Conclusions and recommendations ....................................................................................................... 2 PART A INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ................................................................................ 11 1. About this Review ....................................................................................................................... 12 2. Structure of this Report ............................................................................................................... 15 3. Agency debriefs and acknowledgments ...................................................................................... 16 PART B REVIEW FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................... 17 Section 1 Effectiveness of strategies, preparedness and plans................................................. 18 1.1 National, state and regional plans prior to the June 2016 floods ................................................. 19 1.2 Preparedness ............................................................................................................................. 22 1.3 Were these plans effective? ........................................................................................................ 28 1.4 Potential risk mitigation using flood levees .................................................................................. 30 1.5 Reviews underway prior to the June floods ................................................................................. 32 1.6 Exercise and lessons management unit ...................................................................................... 34 1.7 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 34 1.8 Summary of recommendations in this Section ............................................................................ 35 Section 2 Community awareness, preparation and resilience ................................................... 37 2.1 Definitions ................................................................................................................................... 38 2.2 Relationships between awareness, preparedness and resilience ............................................... 38 2.3 Awareness .................................................................................................................................. 38 2.4 Community preparedness ........................................................................................................... 41 2.5 Resilience ................................................................................................................................... 42 2.6 Flood insurance .......................................................................................................................... 45 2.7 Conclusions ................................................................................................................................ 46 2.8 Summary of recommendations in this Section ............................................................................ 47 Section 3 Causes of the floods ..................................................................................................... 48 3.1 The weather and rainfall ............................................................................................................. 49 3.2 Effect of cloud seeding ............................................................................................................... 52 3.3 Statewide water storage management
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Convict Labour and Colonial Society in the Campbell Town Police District: 1820-1839
    Convict Labour and Colonial Society in the Campbell Town Police District: 1820-1839. Margaret C. Dillon B.A. (Hons) Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph. D.) University of Tasmania April 2008 I confirm that this thesis is entirely my own work and contains no material which has been accepted for a degree or diploma by the University or any other institution, except by way of background information and duly acknowledged in the thesis, and to the best of my knowledge and belief no material previously published or written by another person except where due acknowledgement is made in the text of the thesis. Margaret C. Dillon. -ii- This thesis may be made available for loan and limited copying in accordance with the Copyright Act 1968. Margaret C. Dillon -iii- Abstract This thesis examines the lives of the convict workers who constituted the primary work force in the Campbell Town district in Van Diemen’s Land during the assignment period but focuses particularly on the 1830s. Over 1000 assigned men and women, ganged government convicts, convict police and ticket holders became the district’s unfree working class. Although studies have been completed on each of the groups separately, especially female convicts and ganged convicts, no holistic studies have investigated how convicts were integrated into a district as its multi-layered working class and the ways this affected their working and leisure lives and their interactions with their employers. Research has paid particular attention to the Lower Court records for 1835 to extract both quantitative data about the management of different groups of convicts, and also to provide more specific narratives about aspects of their work and leisure.
    [Show full text]
  • Dpiw – Surface Water Models Mersey River Catchment
    DPIW – SURFACE WATER MODELS MERSEY RIVER CATCHMENT Mersey River Surface Water Model Hydro Tasmania Version No: 1.1 DOCUMENT INFORMATION JOB/PROJECT TITLE Surface Water Hydrological Models for DPIW CLIENT ORGANISATION Department of Primary Industries and Water CLIENT CONTACT Bryce Graham DOCUMENT ID NUMBER WR 2007/027 JOB/PROJECT MANAGER Mark Willis JOB/PROJECT NUMBER E200690/P202167 Document History and Status Revision Prepared Reviewed Approved Date Revision by by by approved type 1.0 J. Bennett Dr Fiona C. Smythe July 2007 Final Ling 1.1 J. Bennett Dr Fiona C. Smythe July 2008 Final Ling Current Document Approval PREPARED BY James Bennett Water Resources Mngt Sign Date REVIEWED BY Dr Fiona Ling Water Resources Mngt Sign Date APPROVED FOR Crispin Smythe SUBMISSION Water Resources Mngt Sign Date Current Document Distribution List Organisation Date Issued To DPIW July 2008 Bryce Graham The concepts and information contained in this document are the property of Hydro Tasmania. This document may only be used for the purposes of assessing our offer of services and for inclusion in documentation for the engagement of Hydro Tasmania. Use or copying of this document in whole or in part for any other purpose without the written permission of Hydro Tasmania constitutes an infringement of copyright. i Mersey River Surface Water Model Hydro Tasmania Version No: 1.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the results of the hydrological model developed for the Mersey River catchment in central-north Tasmania. This report is one of a series of reports that present the methods and results from the development and calibration of surface water hydrological models for 26 Tasmanian catchments under both current and natural flow conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Sea Level Rise on Coastal Natural Values in Tasmania
    Impact of sea level rise on coastal natural values in Tasmania JUNE 2016 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Acknowledgements Thanks to the support we received in particular from Clarissa Murphy who gave six months as a volunteer in the first phase of the sea level rise risk assessment work. We also had considerable technical input from a range of people on various aspects of the work, including Hans and Annie Wapstra, Richard Schahinger, Tim Rudman, John Church, and Anni McCuaig. We acknowledge the hard work over a number of years from the Sea Level Rise Impacts Working Group: Oberon Carter, Louise Gilfedder, Felicity Faulkner, Lynne Sparrow (DPIPWE), Eric Woehler (BirdLife Tasmania) and Chris Sharples (University of Tasmania). This report was compiled by Oberon Carter, Felicity Faulkner, Louise Gilfedder and Peter Voller from the Natural Values Conservation Branch. Citation DPIPWE (2016) Impact of sea level rise on coastal natural values in Tasmania. Natural and Cultural Heritage Division, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au ISBN: 978-1-74380-009-6 Cover View to Mount Cameron West by Oberon Carter. Pied Oystercatcher by Mick Brown. The Pied Oystercatcher is considered to have a very high exposure to sea level rise under both a national assessment and Tasmanian assessment. Its preferred habitat is mudflats, sandbanks and sandy ocean beaches, all vulnerable to inundation and erosion. Round-leaved Pigface (Disphyma australe) in flower in saltmarsh at Lauderdale by Iona Mitchell. Three saltmarsh communities are associated with the coastal zone and are considered at risk from sea level rise.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Works: Memorandum of Proposed Expenditure
    (No. 113.) 1884. PARLIAMENT OF TASMANIA. .PUBLIC WORI{S: MEMORANDUM OF PROPOSED EXPENDITURE. Poosented to both Houses of Parliament by His Excellency's Command. 18 8 4. MEM ORANDU1"'JII of the Expenditure proposed by the Government ini connection with the following Public Worhs. MAIN ROADS. £ s. d. £ s. d. 1. Deloraine to Chudleigh ...•..••........••••.... 800 0 0 2. Road through the Frogmore Estate, Latrobe .•.... 100 0 0 3. River Leven to River Blythe ••••...........•.. 300 0 0 4. River Blythe to Cooee Creek ....•...•....•.•.• 150 0 0 5. From Cooee Creek to Wynyard (Table Cape) ...• 500 0 0 6. Sisters Creek to Detention River, .....••......... 500 0 0 7. Detention River to Stanley, Circular Head .....••. 1000 0 0 8. River Brid to Scottsdale .•..••.... " ••.•....... 1000 0 0 9. X ew Norfolk to Glenora ...........••••••.... : .. 300 0 0 10. Cradoc to Port Cygnet ..•.......•••........... 500 0 0 11. Sorell Causeway. • ••••.....•••••••••• , •••••• 1000 0 0 12. Richmond to Buckland and Orford .•.•••••••...• 750 o ·o 13. Little Swanport to Swansea • • . • . • • . • . • • ... 500 0 0 7400 0 0 M A I N RO A D B RID GE Sn JJ;Ia·in Road, Cambridge to Richmond. 14. Bridge over the Tea Tree Rivulet . • . • . • . • • • • • . 300 0 0 Main Road, Richmond to Bucl,land. 15. Bridge over Brusl1y Plains River at White Marsh.. 500 0 0 16. Bridge over Gully at Thumbs Marsh • • • • . • • • . • 250 0 0 1050 0 0. :B R A N C El: B. 0 A D S. 17. Launceston to Beaconsfield ....•••.............. lOOO O 0 18. Beaconsfield to Flowery Gully .•••••.....•••.... 300 0 0 19. West Tamar to Bridgenorth ..............•....• 500 0 0 20.
    [Show full text]
  • Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania
    PAPERS AND PROCEEDINGS 01' THII ROYAL SOCIETY 01' TASMANIA, JOB (ISSUED JUNE, 1894.) TASMANIA: PJUl'TBD .&.T «TO XBROUBY" OJ'lPIOE, JUOQUUIE BT., HOBART. 1894. Googk A CATALOGUE OF THE MINERALS KNOWN TO OCCUR IN TASMANIA, WITH NOTES ON THEIR DISTRIBUTION• .Bv W. F. PETTERD. THE following Catalogue of the Minerals known to occur and reeortled from this Island is mainly prepared from specimen~ contained in my own collection, and in the majority of instances I have verified the identifications by careful qualitative analysis. It cannot claim any originality of research, 01' even accluac)" of detail, but as the material has been so rapidly accumulating during the past few )'ears I bave thoug-ht it well to place on record the result of my personal observation and collecting, wbich, with information ~Ieaned from authentic sources, may, I trust, at least pave tbe way for a more elaborate compilation by a more capable authority. I have purposely curtailed my remarks on the various species 80 Rs to make them as concise as possible, and to redulle the bulk of the matter. As an amateur I think I may fairly claim tbe indulgence of the professional or otber critics, for I feel sure tbat my task has been very inadequately performed in pro­ portion to the importance of the subjeot-one not only fraugbt with a deep scientific interest on account of tbe multitude of questions arisin~ from the occurrence and deposition of the minerals them­ selves, but also from the great economic results of our growing mining indu.try. My object has been more to give some inform­ ation on tbis subject to the general student of nature,-to point out tbe larg-e and varied field of observation open to him,- than to instruct the more advanced mineralo~ist.
    [Show full text]
  • Mersey River Anglers Access
    EDITION 3 Protect our Waters Recreational anglers have a responsibility to look after Mersey River fisheries resources for the benefit of the environment and future generations. • Do not bring live or dead fish, fish products, animals Anglers or aquatic plants into Tasmania. • Do not bring any used fishing gear or any other Access freshwater recreational equipment that may be damp, wet or contain water into Tasmania. Check, clean and dry your fishing equipment before REGION: NORTH WEST entering Tasmania. • Do not transfer any freshwater fish, frogs, tadpoles, invertebrates or plants between inland waters. • Check your boat, trailer, waders and fishing gear for weed and other pests that should not be transferred before moving between waters. • Do not use willow (which is a plant pest) as a rod support as it has the ability to propagate from a cutting. Warning ANGLING DEEP SLIPPERY REGULATIONS WATER SURFACES APPLY STRONG ELECTRIC FALLING CURRENTS FENCE TREES AND LIMBS CONTACT DETAILS 17 Back River Road, New Norfolk, 7140 Ph: 1300 INFISH www.ifs.tas.gov.au STEEP BANKS CATTLE Caution: Environmental water releases from Lake Parangana may cause the river to rise suddenly. BL11111 Inland Fisheries Service Getting There Angling Notes Angling Regulations The Mersey River rises on the Central Plateau south of Like many Tasmanian rivers, the Mersey boasts deep, To fish in any open public inland water in Tasmania Lake Rowallan and enters Bass Strait at Devonport. This slow-flowing pools and shallow fast sections of water you must hold a current Inland Angling Licence unless brochure refers to a 55 km stretch of the river from Lake that produce good quality trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Lands of Tasmania" an E1tor Was Made in Each of These Averages, B
    (No. 28.) 18 6 4. TASMANIA. L E G I S L A T I V E C O U N C 1 L. L A N D S OF T A S M A N I A. Laid on the Table by Mr. Whyte, and ordered by the Council to be printed, July 1, 1864. .. OF TAS1\1ANIA; COMPILED FROM THE OF~CIAL RECORDS OF THE SURVEY DEPARTMENT, BY ORDER OF THE HONORABLE THE COLONIAL TREASURER Made up to the 31st December, 1862. «ar;mani,t: JAMES BARNARD, GOVERNMENT PRINTER, HOBART TOWN. \ 18 6 4. T A B LE OF C O N T E N T S. PAGE PREFACE •••••.••••••••••••••••••• 3 Area of Tasmania, with alienated and unalienated Lands ...........••... , • . 17 Population of Tasmania •. , ..... , . • . • • . • • . • . • . • . ib. Ditto of Towns .................•••.........•.......... _. 18 · Country Lands granted and sold since 1804 ..•• , •• , ..•....•....... , . • • • . 19 Town Lands sold ..••••......•.......••••...••• , . • . 20 'fown Lands sold for Cash under " The Waste Lands Act" . • • • • • • . 21 Deposits forfeited on ditto. • • • • • • . • . ... , . • • . • . • . 40 Town Lands sold on Credit .......... , ......••.. , , ......... , ..•.... , . , . 42 Agricultuml Lands sold for Cash, under 18th Sect. of '' The Waste Lands Act". 4'5 Ditto on Credit, ditto ...• .', . • . • . • • • • . • . • 46 Ditto for Cash, under 19th Sect. of" The Waste Lands Act" . 49 Ditto on Credit, ditto ....•••••.•....... , , ....... , ....• •... , . • • • • • . 51 Ditto for Cash at Public Auction .••••.............•••.••. , , • . 62 Deposits forfeited on ditto ...... , ........• , .......•.. , . • . 64 Agricultural Lands sold on Credit at Public Auction , •.•••••..•••••.• , . 65 Pastoral Lands sold for CashJ under 18th Sect. of" The ·waste Lands Act" .. , . 71 Ditto on Credit, ditto .•••...•....••..••..•..••............• , • . • • . ib. Ditto for Cash at Public Auction ....•.•.•.•...... , . • • . • . • • . • . 73 Deposits forfeited on ditto •.••••............•., • , • • . • • • . • • • . 74 Pastoral Lands sold on Credit at Public Auction......
    [Show full text]
  • Tasmanian Air Monitoring Report 2011 Compliance with the National Environment Protection Measure (Ambient Air Quality) for 2011 by Tasmania July 2012
    ENVIRONMENT REPORT AIR MONITORING REPORT 2011 -COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION (AMBIENT AIR QUALITY) MEASURE TASMANIAN AIR MONITORING REPORT 2011 COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION MEASURE (AMBIENT AIR QUALITY) FOR 2011 BY TASMANIA JULY 2012 www.environment.tas.gov.au 2013-06-03 ENVIRONMENT REPORT AIR MONITORING REPORT 2011 -COMPLIANCE WITH THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION (AMBIENT AIR QUALITY) MEASURE ii EPA DIVISION, TASMANIA, and the EPA Division’s NATA accreditation. JUNE 2012 Data capture rates in excess of 75% were achieved at all stations except for PM2.5 particulates in quarter 3 (Q3) at Launceston, Executive overview due to equipment breakdown. As an island with a cool climate and a relatively dispersed population, Tasmania experiences This report presents the results of air quality very low ambient levels of industrial and monitoring in Tasmania and assesses them vehicle generated airborne pollutants, such as against the requirements of the Ambient Air ozone (O ), sulphur dioxide (SO ), nitrogen Quality Environment Protection Measure (Air 3 2 dioxide (NO ) and carbon monoxide (CO). NEPM).1 An electronic copy of this and 2 previous year’s reports, together with general The major contribution to urban air pollution air quality data tables, are available on the in Tasmania is smoke from domestic wood Tasmania EPA Divisions website.2 heaters and agricultural and forestry burning. This occurs during the autumn and winter with The Air NEPM establishes: a contribution from bushfires in the summer Requirements for monitoring air quality, months. Air quality standards that are levels of The overall particle pollution levels in specified pollutants against which air Tasmania during 2011 were marginally lower quality can be assessed, than in 2010, with no exceedences of the PM10 standard in Hobart or Launceston.
    [Show full text]
  • National Recovery Plan for the Australian Grayling Prototroctes Maraena
    National Recovery Plan for the Australian Grayling Prototroctes maraena Prepared by Gary Backhouse, Justin O’Connor (Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria) and Dr Jean Jackson (Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Tasmania). Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Melbourne, 2008. © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2008 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. ISBN 1 74152 434 2 (html) This is a Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, with the assistance of funding provided by the Australian Government. This Recovery Plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. An electronic version of this document is available on the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts website www.environment.gov.au For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186 Citation: Backhouse, G., Jackson, J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glacial History of the Upper Mersey Valley
    THE GLACIAL HISTORY OF THE UPPER MERSEY VALLEY by A a" D. G. Hannan, B.Sc., B. Ed., M. Ed. (Hons.) • Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA HOBART February, 1989 CONTENTS Summary of Figures and Tables Acknowledgements ix Declaration ix Abstract 1 Chapter 1 The upper Mersey Valley and adjacent areas: geographical 3 background Location and topography 3 Lithology and geological structure of the upper Mersey region 4 Access to the region 9 Climate 10 Vegetation 10 Fauna 13 Land use 14 Chapter 2 Literature review, aims and methodology 16 Review of previous studies of glaciation in the upper Mersey 16 region Problems arising from the literature 21 Aims of the study and methodology 23 Chapter $ Landforms produced by glacial and periglacial processes 28 Landforms of glacial erosion 28 Landforms of glacial deposition 37 Periglacial landforms and deposits 43 Chapter 4 Stratigraphic relationships between the Rowallan, Arm and Croesus glaciations 51 Regional stratigraphy 51 Weathering characteristics of the glacial, glacifluvial and solifluction deposits 58 Geographic extent and location of glacial sediments 75 Chapter 5 The Rowallan Glaciation 77 The extent of Rowallan Glaciation ice 77 Sediments associated with Rowallan Glaciation ice 94 Directions of ice movement 106 Deglaciation of Rowallan Glaciation ice 109 The age of the Rowallan Glaciation 113 Climate during the Rowallan Glaciation 116 Chapter The Arm, Croesus and older glaciations 119 The Arm Glaciation 119 The Croesus Glaciation 132 Tertiary Glaciation 135 Late Palaeozoic Glaciation 136 Chapter 7 Conclusions 139 , Possible correlations of other glaciations with the upper Mersey region 139 Concluding remarks 146 References 153 Appendix A INDEX OF FIGURES AND TABLES FIGURES Follows page Figure 1: Location of the study area.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution Act 1934 (Tas) [Transcript
    [Received from the Clerk of the Legislative Council the 10th day of January 1935 A.G. Brammall Registrar Supreme Court] TASMANIA. _________ THE CONSTITUTION ACT 1934. _________ ANALYSIS. PART I. – PRELIMINARY. Division III. – The Assembly. 1. Short title. 22. Constitution of the Assembly. 2. Repeal. 23. Triennial Parliaments. 3. Interpretation. 24. Election of Speaker. 25. Quorum of the Assembly. PART II. – THE CROWN. Division IV. – Electoral Divisions and 4. Parliament not dissolved by demise Qualifications Of Electors. of the Crown. 5. Demise of the Crown not to affect 26. Council Divisions. things done before proclamation 27. Assembly Divisions. thereof. 28. Qualification of electors for the 6. All appointments, &c., by the Gover- Legislative Council. nor to continue in force notwith- Joint tenants. standing demise of the Crown. 29. Assembly electors. 7. All civil or criminal process, and all contracts, bonds, and engagements Division V. – Disqualification; Vacation with or on behalf of His Majesty Of Office; Penalty. to subsist and continue notwith- standing demise. 30. Oath to be taken by members. 8. Deputy-Governor’s powers. 31. Commonwealth membership. Interpretation. 32. Office of profit. Exercise of powers by Deputy- 33. Contractors. Governor. 34. Vacation of office for other causes. Provision as to deputy of Lieutenant- 35. Penalty for sitting when disqualified. Governor or Administrator. Act to be retrospective. PART IV. – MONEY BILLS; POWERS OF HOUSES PART III. – PARLIAMENT. 36. Interpretation. Division I. – Both Houses. 37. Money bills to originate in the Assembly. 9. Continuation of existing Houses. 38. All money votes to be recommended Continuance in office of existing by the Governor.
    [Show full text]
  • A Revision of the Tasmanian Freshwater Crayfish Genus Astacopsis Huxley (Decapoda: Parastacidae)
    Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 126, 1992 91 A REVISION OF THE TASMANIAN FRESHWATER CRAYFISH GENUS ASTACOPSIS HUXLEY (DECAPODA: PARASTACIDAE). by Premek Hamr (with three text-figures) HAMR, P., 1992 (31 :x): A revision of the Tasmanian freshwater crayfish genus Astacopsis Huxley (Dccapoda: ·Parastacidae). Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 126: 91-94. ISSN 0080-4703. 28 Undercliffe Ave, Hamilton, Ontario, L8P 3HI, Canada: formerly Department of Zoology, University of Tasmania. During a broad study of the biology of the freshwater in rhe Tasmanian genus fWO distinct forms of Astacopsis franklinii were recognised. These "forms" were found to diffcr in terms of their general morphology and distribution. As a result, the taxonomy of Astacopsis has been revised to re-establish the three species originally described by Ellen Clark. Astacopsis franklinii Gray has been divided into fWO separate species, the eastern Astacopsis franklinti and the western Astacopsis tricorn is, while the status ofArtacopsis gouldi remains unaltered. Key Words: Astacopsis, Tasmania, distribution, taxonomy. INTRODUCTION to vary greatly in size and spininess. In their re-examination of the various morphological characters, Swain et al. (1982) The members of the genus Astacopsis, which include the found that the variation in spininess and size had a world's largest freshwater crayfish (and therefore invertebrate) geographical basis. It will be shown in this study that this species, are associated with riverine and lacustrine habitats variation is, in fact, at least partly due to the occurrence of throughout Tasmania (Swain et al. 1982). Taxonomically two distinct forms within A. franklinii, and it is further and ecologically their closest relatives are the crayfishes of the proposed that these two forms should be treated as two genera Euastacus and Astacoides (Hobbs 1987,1988, Riek separate species.
    [Show full text]