Powerdesigner® 15.3 Vs. Computer Associates Erwin 7.3
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Enterprise Architecture
Enterprise Architecture The Zachman Framework: Intro to Sample Models © 1990-2011 John A. Zachman, Zachman International® Observation Enterprises are COMPLEX The US Pentagon GM Plant © 1990-2011 John A. Zachman, Zachman International® Agenda I. Enterprise Models from Literature II. Implementation Discussion III. Architecture Discussion IV. Column 1 Model Samples V. Row 1 Model Samples VI. Column 2 Model Samples VII.Etc., Etc. ‘till Time Is Up © 1990-2011 John A. Zachman, Zachman International® Models on my Bookshelf 1. "Requirements Analysis" by David C. Hay Activity Management A Complete Sarson and Gane Data Flow Diagram Physical Asset Value Constraints 2. "Information Modeling and Relational Databases" by Terry Halpin and Tony Morgan IT Company Schema and University Schema 3. "Enterprise Architecture for Integration" by Clive Finkelstein Strategic Model for sample solution Order entry data map with all attributes 5BNF data map - ORG and ROLE STRUCTURES 4. "Designing Quality Databases with IDEF1X Information Models" by Thomas A. Bruce Case Study Supplementary Material (Logical Data Model) 5. "Business Process Management"by Roger T. Burlton The Scope for Global Software Human Resources © 1990-2011 John A. Zachman, Zachman International® Models on my Bookshelf 6. "Enterprise Architecture at Work" by Marc Langhorst Services provided by Handle Claims Process Handle Claims and IT Support 7. "Business Process Engineering" by August Scheer ERM for Human Resource Planning Event-driven process chain for inbound logistics 8. "Data Model Resource -
Enterprise Architecture As Explanatory Information Systems Theory for Understanding Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprise Growth
sustainability Article Enterprise Architecture as Explanatory Information Systems Theory for Understanding Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprise Growth Aurona Gerber 1,2,* , Pierre le Roux 1,3 and Alta van der Merwe 1 1 Department of Informatics, University of Pretoria, 0083 Pretoria, South Africa; [email protected] (P.R.); [email protected] (A.v.d.M.) 2 CAIR, Center for Artificial Intelligence Research, 0083 Pretoria, South Africa 3 Moyo, 0157 Centurion, South Africa * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 July 2020; Accepted: 7 October 2020; Published: 15 October 2020 Abstract: Understanding and explaining small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME) growth is important for sustainability from multiple perspectives. Research indicates that SMEs comprise more than 80% of most economies, and their cumulative impact on sustainability considerations is far from trivial. In addition, for sustainability concerns to be prioritized, an SME has to be successful over time. In most developing countries, SMEs play a major role in solving socio-economic challenges. SMEs are an active research topic within the information systems (IS) discipline, often within the enterprise architecture (EA) domain. EA fundamentally adopts a systems perspective to describe the essential elements of a socio-technical organization and their relationships to each other and to the environment in order to understand complexity and manage change. However, despite rapid adoption originally, EA research and practice often fails to deliver on expectations. In some circles, EA became synonymous with projects that are over-budget, over-time and costly without the expected return on investment. In this paper, we argue that EA remains indispensable for understanding and explaining enterprises and that we fundamentally need to revisit some of the applications of EA. -
CA Erwin Data Modeler Implementation Guide
CA ERwin® Data Modeler Implementation Guide r7.3 r7.3.8 SP2 Edition This documentation and any related computer software help programs (hereinafter referred to as the "Documentation") are for your informational purposes only and are subject to change or withdrawal by CA at any time. This Documentation may not be copied, transferred, reproduced, disclosed, modified or duplicated, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of CA. This Documentation is confidential and proprietary information of CA and may not be used or disclosed by you except as may be permitted in a separate confidentiality agreement between you and CA. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if you are a licensed user of the software product(s) addressed in the Documentation, you may print a reasonable number of copies of the Documentation for internal use by you and your employees in connection with that software, provided that all CA copyright notices and legends are affixed to each reproduced copy. The right to print copies of the Documentation is limited to the period during which the applicable license for such software remains in full force and effect. Should the license terminate for any reason, it is your responsibility to certify in writing to CA that all copies and partial copies of the Documentation have been returned to CA or destroyed. TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, CA PROVIDES THIS DOCUMENTATION "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT WILL CA BE LIABLE TO THE END USER OR ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, DIRECT OR INDIRECT, FROM THE USE OF THIS DOCUMENTATION, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS, LOST INVESTMENT, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, GOODWILL, OR LOST DATA, EVEN IF CA IS EXPRESSLY ADVISED IN ADVANCE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGE. -
Study of Implementing Zachman Framework for Modeling Information Systems for Manufacturing Enterprises Aggregate Planning
Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, January 22 – 24, 2011 Study of Implementing Zachman Framework for Modeling Information Systems for Manufacturing Enterprises Aggregate Planning Radwan, A., and Majid Aarabi Department of Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, 81310 Skudai, Johor, MALAYSIA [email protected] , [email protected] Abstract Response time on orders of customers is becoming a critical issue to achieve a competitive advantage. A major problem is a lack of strategic perspective of information systems. A need for adequate tools and methodologies to model the system structure and to define integrated requirements is a must for the manufacturing enterprises. This paper presents a study of implementing Zachman Framework ZF to model information systems for aggregate planning activities within the manufacturing enterprises. An Information System for simulating the aggregate planning activities such as evaluating the various planes for determining the production rate, inventory levels, subcontracting and the required human resources is modeled. This is assumed to provide control over the order processes and reporting the orders status online. It is assumed that the customer can have access to the system to follow up with his order progressing status. Managers would have control on orders transactions, and workshop floor supervisors could monitor and control the orders processing online. Some artifacts are introduced to ZF to enhance its capability for modeling of information systems for Aggregate Planning in Manufacturing Enterprises. Keywords: Manufacturing Information Systems, Zachman Framework, Enterprise architecture, Aggregate planning, Modeling. 1. Introduction Nowadays, the enterprises encounter with numerous amount of data. -
Erwin Data Modeler Workgroup Edition Implementation And
erwin® Data Modeler Workgroup Edition Implementation and Administration Guide Release 9.8 This Documentation, which includes embedded help systems and electronically distributed materials (hereinafter referred to as the “Documentation”), is for your informational purposes only and is subject to change or withdrawal by erwin Inc. at any time. This Documentation is proprietary information of erwin Inc. and may not be copied, transferred, reproduced, disclosed, modified or duplicated, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of erwin Inc. If you are a licensed user of the software product(s) addressed in the Documentation, you may print or otherwise make available a reasonable number of copies of the Documentation for internal use by you and your employees in connection with that software, provided that all erwin Inc. copyright notices and legends are affixed to each reproduced copy. The right to print or otherwise make available copies of the Documentation is limited to the period during which the applicable license for such software remains in full force and effect. Should the license terminate for any reason, it is your responsibility to certify in writing to erwin Inc. that all copies and partial copies of the Documentation have been returned to erwin Inc. or destroyed. TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ERWIN INC. PROVIDES THIS DOCUMENTATION “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT WILL ERWIN INC. BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, DIRECT OR INDIRECT, FROM THE USE OF THIS DOCUMENTATION, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS, LOST INVESTMENT, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, GOODWILL, OR LOST DATA, EVEN IF ERWIN INC. -
Examining Capabilities As Architecture
September 2013 BPTrends ▪ Examining Capabilities as Architecture Examining Capabilities as Architecture Ralph Whittle Introduction This Article is a direct response to one written by Mike Rosen titled, “Are Capabilities Architecture?” [1] published in February 2013 by BPTrends It offers a different and contrasting point of view on accepting capability modeling and mapping as “architecture.” Business Architecture (BA) approaches and methods, while still evolving, have at least reached a point of maturity where the enterprise can fairly assess how it will develop and advance this initiative. As with any emerging field, a variety of approaches and methods will develop and enjoy success. From an historical perspective, consider the number of Business Process Management (BPM), Enterprise Architecture (EA) and Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) approaches that have matured over the years. And no doubt, the same will eventually occur with the Business Architecture over the next few years. However, just as with the BPM, EA and SOA some different and contrasting points of view will find their way into the various Business Architecture approaches, techniques and methods. Today, at least two different and contrasting organizing principles are considered for Business Architecture. One is “capability centric” and the other is “process centric.” This article advocates and supports the “process centric” organizing principle, specifically using a value stream which is an end-to-end collection of activities that creates a result for a “customer,” who may be the ultimate customer or an internal “end user” of the value stream. The value stream has a clear goal: to satisfy (or, better, to delight) the customer.[2] This is a well known term, familiar in Six Sigma, Lean Manufacturing and BPM approaches. -
CA Erwin Data Modeler
CA ERwin Data Modeler From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia CA ERwin Data Modeler (ERwin) is a software tool for data modeling (data requirements analysis, database design etc.) of custom developed information systems, including databases of transactional systems and data marts. ERwin's data modeling engine is based upon the IDEF1X method, although it now supports diagrams displayed with information engineering notation as well. Logic Works stylised "ERwin" from an abbreviation of "Entity Relationships" and Microsoft's "Windows". Contents [hide] 1 History 2 Distinguishing features 3 Physical Modeling support 4 Limitations 5 Associated products 6 See also 7 Publications 8 References 9 External links History[edit] ERwin CASE tool on Windows 2000 ERwin was created by Logic Works. It was acquired in 1998 by Platinum Technology, which was later acquired in May 1999 by Computer Associates, who added it to their AllFusion suite under the name AllFusion ERwin Data Modeler. The tool was later renamed to CA ERwin Data Modeler. Distinguishing features[edit] Logical Data Modeling: Purely logical models may be created, from which physical models may be derived. Combinations of logical and physical models are also supported. Supports entity-type and attribute logical names and descriptions, logical domains and data types, as well as relationship naming. Physical Data Modeling: Purely physical models may be created as well as combinations of logical and physical models. Supports the naming and description of tables and columns, user defined data types, primary keys, foreign keys, alternative keys and the naming and definition of constraints. Support for indexes, views, stored procedures and triggers is also included. -
CA Erwin Data Modeler Data Modeling Overview Guide
CA ERwin® Data Modeler Data Modeling Overview Guide Release 9.64.01 This Documentation, which includes embedded help systems and electronically distributed materials (hereinafter referred to as the “Documentation”), is for your informational purposes only and is subject to change or withdrawal by CA at any time. This Documentation is proprietary information of CA and may not be copied, transferred, reproduced, disclosed, modified or duplicated, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of CA. If you are a licensed user of the software product(s) addressed in the Documentation, you may print or otherwise make available a reasonable number of copies of the Documentation for internal use by you and your employees in connection wi th that software, provided that all CA copyright notices and legends are affixed to each reproduced copy. The right to print or otherwise make available copies of the Documentation is limited to the period during which the applicable license for such software remains in full force and effect. Should the license terminate for any reason, it is your responsibility to certify in writing to CA that all copies and partial copies of the Documentation have been returned to CA or destroyed. TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, CA PROVIDES THIS DOCUMENTATION “AS IS” WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT WILL CA BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANY THIRD PARTY FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, DIRECT OR INDIRECT, FROM THE USE OF THIS DOCUMENTATION, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, LOST PROFITS, LOST INVESTMENT, BUSINESS INTERRUPTION, GOODWILL, OR LOST DATA, EVEN IF CA IS EXPRESSLY ADVISED IN ADVANCE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGE. -
Enterprise Architecture 1 Zachman Framework
member of The Zachman Framework Prof. Dr. Knut Hinkelmann Introduction to Business-IT Alignment and Enterprise Architecture 1 Zachman Framework ■ Regarded the origin of enterprise architecture frameworks (originally called "Framework for Information Systems Architecture") ■ First version published in 1987 by John Zachman ■ It is still further developed by Zachman International (http://www.zachman.com) ■ Often referenced as a standard approach for expressing the basic elements of enterprise architecture Zachman, J.A., 1987. A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3). Prof. Dr. Knut Hinkelmann Enterprise Architecture Frameworks 2 Rationale of the Zachman Architecture ■ There is not a single descriptive representation for a complex object ... there is a SET of descriptive representations. ■ Descriptive representations (of anything) typically include: ♦ Perspectives Abstractions ♦ Abstractions Perspectives (Zachman 2012) Prof. Dr. Knut Hinkelmann Enterprise Architecture Frameworks 3 Dimension 1 – Perspectives Zachman originally used the analogy of classical architecture For the different stakeholders different aspects of a building are relevant - models of the building from different perspectives Bubble charts: conceptual representation delivered by the architect Architect's drawing: transcription of the owner's perceptual requirements – owner's perspective Architect's plans: translation of the owner's requirements into a product – designer's perspective Contractor's plans: phases of operation, architect's plans contrained by nature and technology – builder's perspective Shop plans: parts/sections/components of building details (out-of-context specification) – subcontractor's perspective The building: physical building itself (Zachman 1987) Prof. Dr. Knut Hinkelmann Enterprise Architecture Frameworks 4 Dimension 1: Architectural Representations with analogies in Building and Information Systems (Zachman 1987) Prof. -
075 06/09/2017 HSSCCG17J00025 Depart
ORDER FOR SUPPLIES OR SERVICES I PAGE 0~ PAGES IMPORTANT: Mark all packages and papers with contract and/or order numbers. I 1 13 1. DATE OF ORDER 2. CONTRACT NO. g' aE~ 6. SHIP TO. HSHQDC-13- - 075 06/09/2017 a. NAME OF CONSIGNEE 3. ORDER NO. 14. REQUISITION/REFERENCE NO. Departme nt of Homeland Security HSSCCG17J00025 5. ISSUING OFFICE (Address correspondence to) b. STREET ADDRESS USCIS Contracting Office Citi zenshi p & Immigration Services Depar t ment of Home l a nd Securi ty Chi ef Informa t ion Officer 70 Kimball Avenue 5th floor #102 South Burlington VT 054 03 111 Massachus etts Ave NW c CITY Id . STATE I:e ZIP CODE Washington DC 20001 7. TO I SHIP VIA a NAME OF CONTRACTOR SEVATEC INC 8. TYPE OF ORDER b. COMPANY NAME O a PURCHASE IRJ b. DELIVERY c. STREET ADDRESS REFERENCE YOUR: 3112 FAIRVI EW PARK DR IVE Sevatec Of fer Except lor billing instructions on the reverse, this delivery order is Dated Decembe r 2, 2016 subject to instructions contained on thiS side only of this form and is Please lumish the lollow1ng on the terms issued subject to the terms and and conditions specified on both sides or conditions or the above-(lumbered d. CITY Ie . STATE Ir . ZIP CODE this order and on the attached sheet, il contract FALLS CHURCH VA 2204 245 04 anv. 1ncludinc deliverv as ind1cated. 9. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA 10. REQUISITIONING OFFICE See Schedul e users Co ntracting Office 11 . BUSINESS CLASSIFICATION (Check appropriate box(es)) 12. -
The Selection of Cloud Services for {ER}-Diagrams Construction In
The selection of cloud services for ER-diagrams construction in IT specialists databases teaching Tetiana A. Vakaliuk1,4, Olha V. Korotun1 and Serhiy O. Semerikov2,3,4,5 1Zhytomyr Polytechnic State University, 103 Chudnivska Str., Zhytomyr, 10005, Ukraine 2Kryvyi Rih State Pedagogical University, 54 Gagarin Ave., Kryvyi Rih, 50086, Ukraine 3Kryvyi Rih National University, 11 Vitalii Matusevych Str., Kryvyi Rih, 50027, Ukraine 4Institute of Information Technologies and Learning Tools of the NAES of Ukraine, 9 M. Berlynskoho Str., Kyiv, 04060, Ukraine 5University of Educational Management, 52-A Sichovykh Striltsiv Str., Kyiv, 04053, Ukraine Abstract One of the main aspects of studying databases in higher education institutions by future IT specialists is database design and software product development. This, in turn, is the most important problem of the developer’s interaction with the customer. To facilitate the process of database design, ER-diagrams are used, which are based on the concepts of “Entity” and “Relationship”. An ER diagram allows you to present a database in the form of visual graphical objects that define a specific subject area. The article considers the available cloud services for the construction of ER-diagrams for learning databases of future IT specialists and their selection the method expert evaluation. For this purpose, the criteria and indicators for the selection of cloud services for the construction of ER-diagrams of databases by future information technology specialists have been determined. As a result, it was found that the cloud services Dbdesigner.net and Lucidchart are the most convenient to learn. It is determined that for a teacher of a higher education institution the use of cloud services is an opportunity to use licensed software in education without additional costs. -
A Methodology to Create Data Architecture in Zachman Framework
World Applied Sciences Journal 3 (Supple 2): 43-49, 2008 ISSN 1818-4952 © IDOSI Publications, 2008 A Methodology to Create Data Architecture in Zachman Framework 1Reza Rezaei and 2Fereidoon Shams 1Computer Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering,Islamic Azad University of Saveh Branch, Saveh, Iran 2Computer Engineering Department, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran Abstract: Lack of methodology for applying Zachman framework is a challenge that an architect who use it will face. Although there have been methodologies which were some how mapped with this framework but until now no methodology has supported one or more columns of this framework completely and in an integrated way. In this paper, we proposed an integrated process for developing Data Architecture views in Zachman framework. One of the most important advantages of this approach is its property which is based on the enterprise's strategic plan, goals and responsibilities, Business and applications Architecture. Key words : Zachman framework • methodology • data architecture • enterprise architecture framework • modeling. INTRODUCTION The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2, we introduce Zachman Framework. It goes without saying that nowadays utilizing Next, the problem was defined in section 3. We discuss information and communication technologies in our proposed approach in section 4 and present a enterprises is one of the most challenging tasks. An case study in section 5. Finally, in section 6, we enterprise is considered a set of elaborate physical and make conclusions and suggest some comments for logical processes in which information flow plays a future works. crucial role. The common way to comprehend procedures in an enterprise is to provide views of Zachman framework: In 1987, an IBM researcher, components within that enterprise, which is called named John A.