Court File No. 09-CL-8456-00CL BETWEEN

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Court File No. 09-CL-8456-00CL BETWEEN Court File No. 09-CL-8456-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF JAMES ROBERT TUCKER, RICHARD HEIS AND ALLAN WATSON GRAHAM OF KPMG LLP, AS JOINT ADMINISTRATORS Applicants AND IN THE MATTER OF AERO INVENTORY(UK) LIMITED and AERO INVENTORY PLC Respondents APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 46 AND FOLLOWING OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C- 36, AS AMENDED BOOK OF AUTHORITIES OF AIR CANADA (Returnable July 24, 2014) Dated: July 10, 2014 STIKEMAN ELLIOTT LLP Barristers & Solicitors 5300 - 199 Bay Street Toronto, Canada M5L 1B9 David R. Byers LSUC#: 22992W Tel: (416) 869-5662 Alexander D. Rose LSUC#: 49415P Tel: (416) 869-5261 Fax: (416) 947-0866 Lawyers for Air Canada 6268291 vl INDEX Court File No, 09-CL-8456-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) BETWEEN: IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF JAMES ROBERT TUCKER, RICHARD HEIS AND ALLAN WATSON GRAHAM OF KPMG LLP, AS JOINT ADMINISTRATORS Applicants AND IN THE MATTER OF AERO INVENTORY(UK) LIMITED and AERO INVENTORY PLC Respondents APPLICATION UNDER SECTION 46 AND FOLLOWING OF THE COMPANIES' CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R,S,C, 1985, c. C- 36, AS AMENDED INDEX TAB DOCUMENT 1. Kelly R, Palmer, The Law of Set-Off in Canada, (Toronto: Canada Law Book, 1993) 2. L.W. Houlden and Geoffrey B. Morawetz, Houlden and Morawetz Bankruptcy and Insolvency Analysis, Thomson Reuters Canada Limited, electronic version, F§237 3, Husky Oil Operations Ltd. v. Minister of National Revenue, [1995] 3 SCR 453 4, Citibank Canada v. Confederation Life Insurance Co, (Liquidator of), [1996] OJ No. 3409 (S.C.J.) 6268291 vl - 3 - TAB DOCUMENT 5. National Foundation for Hepatitis C (Trustee of) v. GWE Group Inc, (1999), 8 C.B,R. (4th) 281 (A.B.Q.B.) 6. Quintette Coal v. Nippon Steel Carp, (1990), 2 CBR (3d) 303 (B.C.C.A.) 7. Re Blue Range Resource Corp., 2000 ABCA 200 8. Re Blue Range Resource Corp., 1999 ABQB 1038 9. Re Canadian Airlines Corp., 2001 ABQB 146 10. NEST Energy Marketing Canada Ltd. (Trustee of) v. NGL Supply (Gas) Co., 2001 ABCA 168 11. Coopers & Lybrand Ltd, v, Lumberland Building Materials Ltd., (1983), 50 CBR (NS) 150 (B,C.S.C.) 12. Re Brunswick Chrysler Plymouth Ltd. (2004) 11 CBR (5th) 10 (N.B. Q.B.) 13. Re Hartford Computer Hardware, Inc., [2012] OJ No. 715 (S.C.J. [Comm. List]) 14. Re Air Canada, [2003] OJ No. 6058 (S.C.J. [Comm. List]) 15. Bruce MacDougall, Estoppel (Markham: Lexis Nexis, 2012) 67682.9a of TAB 1 The 1.1fl, Ca 17 D. a di VI Kelly R. Palmer, B.A. (Dist), M.B.A., LL.B. (Dist) Barrister and Solicitor, Law Society of Alberta Solicitor of The Supreme Court of England and Wales CANADA LAW BOOK INC. 240 Edward St., Aurora, Ontario @ CANADA LAW BOOK INC., 1993 Printed in Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any photographic, electronic, mechanical or other means, or used in any information storage and retrieval system, without the written per- mission of the publisher. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National Standards for Information Sciences — Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Palmer, Kelly R. (Kelly Ross), 1959- The law of set-off in Canada Includes index. ISBN D-88804-346-2 I. Set-off and counterclaim — Canada, I. Tile. KE1485 P3 1993 346.71'077 C93-093948-4 KFI501.P3 1993 Chapter 4 Set-off in Insolvency A. Introduction A major application of the rights of set-off arises in cases of insol- vency. The assets of an insolvent individual or firm will often include claims (such as accounts receivable) which pass to a receiver, trustee in bankruptcy or liquidator (referred to in this introduction as a "trustee"), It is then the role of the trustee to profitably realize on these assets for the benefit of creditors of the insolvent. In the course of this realization, the trustee may either commence an action against a third party debtor for an outstanding debt owed to the insolvent, only to be met with a claim for set-off of a debt owed to the debtor by the insolvent; or be faced with claims made by creditors of the insolvent, against which the trustee may wish to raise a set-off of debts owed to the insolvent by the same creditors. In the first case, the debtor may wish to rely on the principles of sot-off in order to avoid paying further funds to the insolvent estate with little likelihood of getting a full return. In the second case, the trustee may attempt to maintain the value of the estate by reducing amounts paid out to specific creditors. In either case, the principles of legal or equitable set-off will be applicable. While numerous provincial statutes have an impact upon insolvency, the discussion in this chapter will be limited to the effects of set-off in four areas: receivership, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act, 1 the Wind- ing-up Act, 2 and the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act. 3 While the discussion will touch upon the operation of each area, a detailed analysis and description of general principles and practices is well beyond the scope of this book, Excellent works which offer guidance in the specifics of each area of insolvency are available and will be referred to below. 1 R.S.C. 1985, c. B-3 (am. S.C. 1992, c. 27). 2. R.S.C. 1985, c. W-11. 3, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36. 157 The Law of Set-Off in Canada One overall point is worthy of note, The application of the principles of set-off in Canada do not differ in any meaningful way between solvent and insolvent situations. Certain issues, such as mutuality, do take on a greater importance due to the transfer of the insolvent's estate to the trustee. Few Canadian cases, however, treat the principles of set-off any differently in an insolvency than in a case where both debtor and creditor are solvent. 4 This differs from the approach taken in other jurisdictions where the application of set-off in bankruptcy can be quite different than in solvent situations. 5 Accordingly, readers seeking guidance for an in- solvent set-off are referred as well to the chapters regarding legal and equitable set-off which describe the basic principles which a court will apply. B. Set-off and Receivership (1) Generally , A receiver will be appointed to act for a creditor pursuant to private financial arrangements between the debtor and the creditor, usually de- scribed in security documentation between the parties (such as a deben- ture). Once appointed, the receiver will either attempt to liquidate the assets of the debtor or to continue to operate the business of the debtor as a going concern. In either case, the receiver will either attempt to collect on debts owed to the debtor or will be faced with claims made by other creditors for outstanding debts owed by the debtor to them, The essential aspect of receivership for set-off is that the appointment of the receiver will entail an equitable assignment of the debtor's property to the receiver. 6 Kerr7 notes that: ... the principles applicable are those relating to the right of set-off as against an equitable assignee. For either the debenture contains a fixed charge upon all the future property of the company, thus assigning in equity the benefit of any contractual debt due to the company to the debenture holders immediately upon its coming into existence, or else the debenture contains a floating charge upon all the future property of the company, in which case the crystallization of the floating charge produces the same equitable assignment by way of charge against the debenture holders. Accordingly, the appointment of a receiver will result in an assign- ment of the debtor's assets to the receiver with the result that the issues 4. These tend to be in very limited areas. For example, the ability to purchase claims prior to a bankruptcy in order to set them of against claims owed to the insolvent estate may be different than in a solvent situation, See "Buying Up Debts" under heading, "Fraudulent preferences in non-banking cases", 5, The application of set-off in England is different in the two situations, See "Generally" under heading, "Set-Off and Bankruptcy", 'infra. 6, Re Associated Investors of Canada Ltd. (1989), 62 D.L.R. (4th) 269 at pp. 271-2, [19901 1 W.W.R. 447 (Alta. Q.B.). 7. Walton, Raymond, Hunter and Muir, eds,, Kerr on the Law and Practice as to Receivers and Administration, 17th ed, (London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1989), pp. 380-81. 158 TAB 2 HMANALY F§237 Page 1 Houlden & Morawetz Analysis F§237 F1MANALY F§237 Houlden and Morawetz Bankruptcy and Insolvency Analysis L,W. Houlden and Geoffrey B. Morawetz Thomson Reuters Canada Limited or its Licensors (excluding individual court documents). All rights reserved. Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Part IV (ss, 67-101.2) F§237 Set-Off F'§237 Set-Off See s. 97 (1) Generally The right of set-off in bankruptcy takes its origin from the fact that jurisdiction in bankruptcy was closely connected with equity, the appoint merit of bankruptcy commissioners being made by the Lord Chancellor: see 13 Eliz, I, c.
Recommended publications
  • An Empirical Investigation of Corporate Division 1 Proposals in the Toronto Bankruptcy Region Jacob S
    Osgoode Hall Law Journal Article 3 Volume 41, Number 4 (Winter 2003) An Empirical Investigation of Corporate Division 1 Proposals in the Toronto Bankruptcy Region Jacob S. Ziegel Rajvinder S. Sahni Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj Article Citation Information Ziegel, Jacob S. and Sahni, Rajvinder S.. "An Empirical Investigation of Corporate Division 1 Proposals in the Toronto Bankruptcy Region." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 41.4 (2003) : 665-710. http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol41/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Osgoode Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Osgoode Hall Law Journal by an authorized editor of Osgoode Digital Commons. An Empirical Investigation of Corporate Division 1 Proposals in the Toronto Bankruptcy Region Abstract In 1992, Canada's Parliament approved major amendments to the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA). The amendments included the adoption of a new Commercial Proposal regime for the reorganization of insolvent Canadian businesses with a view to enabling more enterprises to stay in business and avoid liquidation under the other provisions of the BIA. This article reports the results of an empirical study of all Division 1 corporate proposals filed in Toronto between November 1992 and December 1996 to determine how the new proposal regime works in practice. The uthora s' overall conclusion is that the 1992 amendments have achieved their goals, both procedurally and substantively. However, the authors also find that there is room for improvement and, in particular, see a need for a better screening procedure to discourage the initiation of unmeritorious cases, durable resolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Legislative Recognition of the Public Creditor Access to the Partial
    Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 16 (12): 1632-1636, 2013 ISSN 1990-9233 © IDOSI Publications, 2013 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2013.16.12.12069 Legislative Recognition of the Public Creditor Access to the Partial Seizure of Property and the Future Revenues of the Russian Citizen-The Debtor, in Russia and Abroad Tatyana Mikhailovna Zhukova and Ksenya Sergeevna Kondratyeva Perm State National Research University, Perm, Russia Abstract: In the article, the variants are given of the Russian and the foreign regulation of the public creditor access to the partial seizure of the property and the future revenues of the debtor and the conclusion is made about the possibility and the necessity to introduce such a mechanism of relieving from debts in the Russian Federation. The authors performed a comparative analysis of the legislation in England, the USA, Canada and Russia. Based on the analysis the conclusion is made that modern systems have a tendency of applying the bankruptcy regulation systems depending on the size of the debt and the debtor’s income. The authors believe that in the bankruptcy system, it is necessary to research the procedures that prevent declaring bankrupt and in particular-the procedures that give the debtor an opportunity to get relieving from debts in accordance with the legislation, avoiding the full sale of the property of the private person. To improve the existing bankruptcy prevention system, it is proposed to legally define the debt plan as a procedure allowing the debtor to change the conditions of the debt repayment as compared to the bankruptcy procedures, at the expense of the future revenues during several years and possible partial sale of the property, guided by the arbitration manager and controlled by the arbitration court.
    [Show full text]
  • Bankruptcy and Insolvency Law of Canada Contents
    BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY LAW OF CANADA CONTENTS VOLUME 1 Preface ....................................................................................... iii Contents ....................................................................................... v User's Guide ....................................................................................... ix Table of Concordance ............................................................................... xiii Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Table of Contents .................................................................................. 1-i Short Title (s. 1)...................................................................................... 1-1 Interpretation (ss. 2-4.1) ............................................................................. 1-21 Part I - Administrative Officials (ss. 5-41)......................................................... 1-55 Part II - Bankruptcy Orders and Assignments (ss. 42-49)........................................ 2-1 Part III - Proposals (ss. 50-66.4).................................................................... 2-183 VOLUME 2 Contents ....................................................................................... iii Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act Part IV - Property of the Bankrupt (ss. 67-87) .................................................... 3-1 Part IV - Property of the Bankrupt (ss. 91-101.2) ................................................ 4-1 Part V - Administration of Estates (ss. 102-157).................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rediscovering the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Power: Political and Constitutional Challenges to the Bankruptcy Act, 1919-1929 Thomas G
    Western University Scholarship@Western Law Publications Law School 2017 Rediscovering the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Power: Political and Constitutional Challenges to the Bankruptcy Act, 1919-1929 Thomas G. W. Telfer Western University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/lawpub Part of the Bankruptcy Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Citation of this paper: “Rediscovering the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Power: Political and Constitutional Challenges to the Bankruptcy Act, 1919-1929” (2017) 80:1 Saskatchewan Law Review 37-70. 1 “Rediscovering the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Power: Political and Constitutional Challenges to the Bankruptcy Act, 1919-1929” (2017) 80:1 Saskatchewan Law Review 37-70. 2 Rediscovering the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Power: Political and Constitutional Challenges to the Canadian Bankruptcy Act, 1919-1929 Thomas G. W. Telfer [A]ll these questions—that is the rights of the parliament of Canada as against the provincial legislature to legislate in matters of bankruptcy--will in due course come before the judicial committee of the Privy Council. S.W. Jacobs, House of Commons Debates, 26 March 19231 I. INTRODUCTION The enactment of the Canadian Bankruptcy Act of 19192 created a great deal of optimism in the business and legal community. The new statute finally enabled Canada to join other civilized nations, like England and the United States, that embraced bankruptcy law as a permanent commercial statute.3 The idea of using a federal law to deal with debtors and creditors was new to the Canadian legal world in 1919. Although s. 91(21) of the Constitution Act, 1867 granted Parliament exclusive jurisdiction over “Bankruptcy and Insolvency” the Dominion largely abandoned4 this federal power by repealing the Professor, Western University, Faculty of Law.
    [Show full text]
  • Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List)
    Court File No. ____________ ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF COMPROMISE AND ARRANGEMENT OF CLINE MINING CORPORATION, NEW ELK COAL COMPANY LLC AND NORTH CENTRAL ENERGY COMPANY Applicants BOOK OF AUTHORITIES OF THE APPLICANTS (Claims Procedure Order and Meetings Order) GOODMANS LLP Suite 3400, 333 Bay Street Toronto, ON M5H 2S7 Robert J. Chadwick (LSUC#: 35165K) Logan Willis (LSUC#: 53894K) Bradley Wiffen (LSUC# 64279L) Tel: (416) 979-2211 Fax: (416) 979-1234 Lawyers for the Applicants INDEX TAB 1. Re SkyLink Aviation Inc., 2013 ONSC 1500 (Ont. Sup. Ct. J. [Commercial List]) 2. Nova Metal Products Inc. v. Comiskey (Trustee of) (1990), 1 O.R. (3d) 289, 1 C.B.R. (3d) 101 (Ont. C.A.) 3. ScoZinc Ltd., Re, 2009 NSSC 163, 55 C.B.R. (5th) 205 4. Norcen Energy Resources Ltd. v. Oakwood Petroleums Ltd. (1988), 72 C.B.R. (N.S.) 20, [1988] A.J. N. 1226 (Alta. Q.B.) 5. SemCanada Crude Co., Re, 2009 ABQB 490, 57 C.B.R. (5th) 205 6. Stelco Inc, Re. (2005), 78 O.R. (3d) 241, 15 C.B.R. (5th) 307 (Ont. C.A.) 7. Re Canadian Airlines Corp. (2000), 19 C.B.R. (4th) 12 (Alta. Q.B.), leave to appeal dismissed (2000), 19 C.B.R. (4th) 33 (Alta. C.A.) 8. ATB Financial v Metcalfe & Mansfield Alternative Investments II Corp. (2008), 43 C.B.R. (5th) 269, 47 B.L.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Court File No. CV-17-11857-00CL
    Court File No. CV-17-11857-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C 36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF TK HOLDINGS INC., AND THOSE OTHER COMPANIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE “A” HERETO (collectively, the "Chapter 11 Debtors") AND IN THE MATTER OF TAKATA CORPORATION, AND THOSE OTHER COMPANIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE “B” HERETO (the "Japanese Debtors", and collectively with the Chapter 11 Debtors, the “Debtors”) APPLICATION OF TK HOLDINGS INC. AND TAKATA CORPORATION UNDER SECTION 46 OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES (re: Order Recognizing Japanese Sale Approval) (Returnable May 17, 2018) May 10, 2018 McCarthy Tétrault LLP Toronto Dominion Bank Tower Toronto, ON M5K 1E6 Fax: (416) 868-0673 Heather Meredith LSUC#: 48354R Tel: (416) 601-8342 Email: [email protected] Eric S. Block LSUC#: 47479K Tel: 416-601-7792 Email: [email protected] Trevor Courtis LSUC#: 67715A Tel: (416) 601-7643 Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Foreign Representatives TO: The Service List AND TO: List of Plaintiffs – Japanese Debtors Court File No. CV-17-11857-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C 36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF TK HOLDINGS INC., AND THOSE OTHER COMPANIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE “A” HERETO (collectively, the "Chapter 11 Debtors") AND IN THE MATTER OF TAKATA CORPORATION, AND THOSE OTHER COMPANIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE “B” HERETO (the "Japanese Debtors", and collectively with the Chapter 11 Debtors, the “Debtors”) APPLICATION OF TK HOLDINGS INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Court File No. CV-17-11857-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT of JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) in the MATTER of the COMPANIES' CREDITORS
    Court File No. CV-17-11857-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C 36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF TK HOLDINGS INC., AND THOSE OTHER COMPANIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE “A” HERETO (the “Chapter 11 Debtors”) AND IN THE MATTER OF TAKATA CORPORATION, AND THOSE OTHER COMPANIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE “B” HERETO (the "Japanese Debtors", and collectively with the Chapter 11 Debtors, the “Debtors”) APPLICATION OF TK HOLDINGS INC. AND TAKATA CORPORATION UNDER SECTION 46 OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES OF THE FOREIGN REPRESENTATIVES (re: Recognition of Claims Processes and Second Day Orders) (Returnable October 13, 2017) October 5, 2017 McCarthy Tétrault LLP Suite 5300, Toronto Dominion Bank Tower Toronto ON M5K 1E6 Heather L. Meredith LSUC#: 48354R Tel: (416) 601-8342 Email: [email protected] Eric S. Block LSUC#: 47479K Tel: 416-601-7792 Email: [email protected] Trevor Courtis LSUC#: 67715A Tel: 416-601-7643 Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Foreign Representatives TO: THE SERVICE LIST SERVICE LIST (as of September 27, 2017) TO: McCARTHY TÉTRAULT LLP AND THORNTON GROUT Suite 5300 TO: FINNIGAN LLP 66 Wellington Street West Suite 3200 Toronto, ON M5K 1E6 100 Wellington Street West Toronto, Ontario Heather L. Meredith M5K 1K7 Tel: 416-601-8342 Email: [email protected] Robert Thornton Tel: 416-304-0560 Eric Block Email: [email protected] Tel: 416-416-601-7792 Email: [email protected] John Porter Tel: 416-304-0778 Trevor Courtis Email: [email protected] Tel: 416-601-7643 Email: [email protected] Rachel Bengino Tel: 416-304-1153 Counsel to the Foreign Representative Email: [email protected] Counsel to the Plan Sponsor AND FTI CONSULTING CANADA AND BENNETT JONES LLP TO: INC.
    [Show full text]
  • 00218SB-E93075 INSOLVENCY BRO.Indd
    InsolvencySource™ The Next Evolution in Legal Research – Introducing WestlawNext® Canada Dramatically improved searching, intelligent tools, and delivers you the best results, faster. Results are ranked an intuitive design are the key differentiating factors that by relevance and sorted by content type, so you can find will provide legal professionals with greater efficiency, what you need in minutes, not hours. effectiveness and confidence in their legal research. New Ways to Organize and Share Research Research Tools that Deliver Efficiency You can copy and paste with standard citation and From the flexible all-in-one search box and customizable annotate documents by highlighting text and adding interface to the search filters and visual indicators, personal notes. You can also drag and drop documents WestlawNext Canada brings you innovative research and text snippets into project folders. Then folder sharing tools so you can research in a way that’s most natural lets you tap into previous research across department and intuitive to you. and organizational boundaries like never before. Save time with instant access to shared documents from any Canada’s Most Advanced Legal Search Engine computer. No more reinventing the wheel. WestlawNext Canada lets you simultaneously search across different content types with a single query and CONVENIENT HOME PAGE AccESS TO EVERYTHING YOU NEED What’s in InsolvencySource™ Using InsolvencySource for Insolvency Law Research The InsolvencySource homepage provides quick and easy access to all of the exclusive research material available on the service, no matter how complex the issue. The weekly Houlden & Morawetz newsletter keeps practitioners up to date on all aspects of debtor- creditor law, not just insolvency law.
    [Show full text]
  • The Reorganization of Insolvent
    THE REORGANIZATION OF INSOLVENT BUSINESSES: A FUNCTIONAL COMPARISON OF THE CANADIAN AND AMERICAN MODELS by KEITH DENNIS YAMAUCHI B.A., The University of Calgary, 1977 LL.B., The University of Saskatchewan, 1981 A THESIS SUBMIEfED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF LAWS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Faculty of Law) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNPIERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA September 1994 © Keith Dennis Yarnauchi In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree , I agree that the library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain not be allowed without my written permission. Department of Li.’ The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada Date ‘ DE-6 (2/88) 11 ABSUACE The business reorganization systems available to fmancially-distressed businesses in Canada are evolving into a system similar to that employed in the United States under Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 (Code). Business reorganizations have been an integral part of American commercial culture for almost a century. In Canada, business debtors may resort to the Companies’ Ceditoi A nwgemeni’ Act (CCAA) or the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA), when seeking to reorganize their affairs. However, Canadian debtors use those systems sparingly. A primary objective of a business reorganization system is to balance the debtor’s rehabilitation efforts with the rights of creditors.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief of Authorities of TK Holdings Inc
    Court File No.: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C 36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF TK HOLDINGS INC., AND THOSE OTHER COMPANIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE “A” HERETO (the “Chapter 11 Debtors”) APPLICATION OF TK HOLDINGS INC. UNDER SECTION 46 OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES OF THE APPLICANT McCarthy Tétrault LLP Suite 5300, Toronto Dominion Bank Tower Toronto ON M5K 1E6 Heather L. Meredith LSUC#: 48354R Tel: (416) 601-8342 Email: [email protected] Eric S. Block LSUC#: 47479K Tel: 416-601-7792 Email: [email protected] Paul Davis LSUC # 65471L Tel: 416-601-8125 Email: [email protected] Trevor Courtis LSUC#: 67715A Tel: 416-601-7643 Email: [email protected] Lawyers for the Foreign Representatives TO: THE SERVICE LIST INDEX Court File No.: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C 36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF TK HOLDINGS INC., AND THOSE OTHER COMPANIES LISTED ON SCHEDULE “A” HERETO (the “Chapter 11 Debtors”) APPLICATION OF TK HOLDINGS INC. UNDER SECTION 46 OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT BRIEF OF AUTHORITIES OF THE APPLICANT INDEX Tab Case 1. Babcock & Wilcox Canada Ltd., 2000 CanLII 22482 (ONSC) 2. Matlack Inc., Re, 2001 CanLII 28467 (ONSC) 3. Lear Canada (Re), 2009 CanLII 37931 (ONSC) 4. Global Light Telecommunications Ltd. (Re), 2004 BCSC 745 5. Global Ocean Carriers Ltd., 251 B.R. 6. MtGox Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Authorities of the Applicants (Genstar Settlement Approval)
    Court File No. CV-19-616077-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES’ CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF COMPROMISE OR ARRANGEMENT OF IMPERIAL TOBACCO CANADA LIMITED, AND IMPERIAL TOBACCO COMPANY LIMITED Applicants BOOK OF AUTHORITIES OF THE APPLICANTS (Genstar Settlement Approval Motion returnable June 26, 2019) June 20, 2019 OSLER, HOSKIN & HARCOURT LLP P.O. Box 50, 1 First Canadian Place Toronto, ON M5X 1B8 Deborah Glendinning (LSO# 31070N) Marc Wasserman (LSO# 44066M) John A. MacDonald (LSO# 25884R) Craig Lockwood (LSO# 46668M) Tel: (416) 362-2111 Fax: (416) 862-6666 Lawyers to the Applicants, Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited and Imperial Tobacco Company Limited LEGAL_1:55434527.3 - 2 - LIST OF AUTHORITIES TAB CASE 1. ATB Financial v Metcalf and Mansfield Alternative Investments II Corp, 2008 ONCA 587 2. Blencoe v British Columbia (Human Rights Commission), 2000 SCC 44 3. Labourers’ Pension Fund of Central and Eastern Canada v Sino-Forest Corporation, 2013 ONSC 1078 4. Re 1511419 Ontario Inc, 2015 ONSC 7538 5. Re Cline Mining Corporation, 2015 ONSC 622 6. Re Grace Canada Inc, 2008 CarswellOnt 6284 (Supt Ct) 7. Re Great Basin Gold Ltd, 2012 BCSC 1773 8. Re Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited et al, 2019 ONSC 1684 9. Re Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited et al, 2019 ONSC 2222 10. Re Imperial Tobacco Canada Limited et al, 2019 ONSC 2611 11. Re Indalex , 2009 CarswellOnt 4465 (Sup Ct) 12. Re Nortel Networks Corp, 2009 CarswellOnt 3583 (Sup Ct) 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Brief of the Proposal Trustee Filed April 22, 2021
    44003 COURT FILE NUMBER: B201-718482 COURT COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL CENTRE CALGARY COM IN THE MATTER OF THE NOTICE OF April 27, 2021 INTENTION TO MAKE A PROPOSAL Justice Neufeld OF GAIN ENERGY LTD. DOCUMENT: BRIEF ADDRESS FOR SERVICE AND MLT AIKINS LLP CONTACT INFORMATION OF 2100, 222 - 3rd Ave SW PARTY FILING THIS DOCUMENT Calgary, AB T2P 0B4 Telephone: 403.693.5420/4347 Fax: 403.508.4349 Attention: Ryan Zahara/Catrina Webster File: 0026391.00013 24821783 - 2 - TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ • 3 - II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................. - 5 - Ill. ISSUES .......................................................................................................................... - 5 - IV. LAW AND ARGUMENT ................................................................................................. - 5 - The Terms of the Proposal are Reasonable ................................................................... - 7 - The Proposal is Calculated to Benefit the General Body of Creditors ............................. - 8 - The Proposal is Made in Good Faith.............................................. ................................. - 8 - V. RELIEF REQUESTED............................ ........................................................................ - 9 - LIST OF AUTHORITIES ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]