UEL Research Repository

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

UEL Research Repository University of East London Professional Doctorate in Clinical Psychology Assessment Proforma Please read the following candidate’s declaration, and tick the adjacent boxes to confirm that you have complied with each statement. Then complete the cover sheet below in full. Failing to do will result in your assessment being returned to you for resubmission. Please raise any queries regarding this form with your academic tutor well in advance of submission. CANDIDATE’S DECLARATION I confirm that no part of this submitted material, except where clearly quoted and referenced, has been copied from material belonging to any other person (e.g., from Tick to confirm a book, article, lecture handout, web site, or another candidate). I am aware that it is a breach of university regulations to copy the work of another without clear acknowledgement, and that attempting to do so will render me liable to disciplinary √ proceedings. I confirm that the word count cited below is accurate, and within the limit allowed for Tick to confirm this type of assessment. The count includes all words in the body of text, diagrams, Tables and footnotes (though not the contents page, references or appendices). I have presented the assessed work with page margins, line spacing, font size and √ page numbers as required in the relevant section of the handbook and module guide. COVER SHEET UEL STUDENT NUMBER U1138198 MODULE CODE WORK TO BE ASSESSED THESIS (e.g., Year 1 Essay, Practical Report 3, SRR) SUBMISSION DATE 09/05/2014 WORD COUNT 23413 1 A study of the relationship between transliminality and interpersonal difficulties: Is the severity of interpersonal difficulties related to sensitivity to unconscious psychological material? Doctorate in Clinical Psychology Thesis Submission date: 12th May 2014 Stephen Rock Student Number: 1138198 2 Table of Contents Page number ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 6 ABSTRACT 7-8 1. BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION 8-30 1.1. Literature review 8-23 1.1.1. Context of this review 8-10 1.1.2. Scope of review 10 1.1.3. Search strategy 10 1.1.3.1 Transliminality search strategy 11 1.1.3.2. Interpersonal difficulties search strategy 11 1.1.3.3. Psychodynamic theories of interpersonal difficulties search 11 strategy 1.1.3.4. Mentalization search strategy 11 1.1.4. Transliminality literature review 12-25 1.1.4.1. Consciousness 12-13 1.1.4.2. The unconscious and preconscious 13-14 1.1.4.3. Evidence from psychology and neuroscience 14-15 1.1.4.4. The development of a measure of transliminality 15-16 1.1.4.5. Qualitative studies of transliminality 17-18 1.1.5. Interpersonal difficulties literature review 18-23 1.1.5.1. Personality disorders 19-21 1.1.5.2. Defining interpersonal difficulties 21-23 1.1.6. Psychodynamic theories of interpersonal difficulties literature 23-25 review 1.2. Exploring the relationship between mentalization and 25-27 transliminality 1.2.1. Mentalization, attachment hyperactivity and IPD 26-27 1.2.2. Mentalization, transliminality and IPD 27 1.3. A hypothesised model of IPD 28 1.3.1. Transliminality and the mentalization model 28-30 1.3.2. Transliminality and psychoanalytic theories of IPD 30 2. RESEARCH QUESTIONS AND HYPOTHESES 30-32 2.1. Research question 1: Is transliminality related to IPD and 30 what is the nature of this relationship? 2.1.1. Hypothesis 1: There will be a U-shaped correlation between 30 IPD and transliminality 2.2. Research question 2: Does transliminality mediate the 31 effects of mentalization and attachment hyperactivation on IPD? 2.2.1. Hypothesis 2: Attachment hyperactivity will positively correlate 31 with IPD. 2.2.2. Hypothesis 3: Mentalization will negatively correlate with IPD. 31 2.2.3. Hypothesis 4: Transliminality with positively correlate with 31 mentalization 3 2.2.4. Hypothesis 5: Transliminality will positively correlate with 31 attachment hyperactivity 2.2.5. Hypothesis 6: Transliminality will mediate the association 32 between mentalization and IPD. 2.2.6. Hypothesis 7: Transliminality will mediate the positive 32 correlation between attachment hyperactivity and IPD. 3. METHOD 33-49 3.1. Rationale for design 33-34 3.2. Epistemology 34 3.3. Participants and Criteria for Selection 34-36 3.3.1. Clinical sample 34-35 3.3.2. Non-clinical sample 35-36 3.4. Sample size and power calculations 36 3.4.1. Power calculations 36 3.5. Measures 37-44 3.5.1. Transliminality - The Revised Transliminality Scale (RTS) 37-39 3.5.2. Interpersonal difficulties - Inventory of Interpersonal Problems 39-40 32 (IIP-32) 3.5.3. Attachment hyperactivity: Experiences in Close Relationships 40-42 Questionnaire (ECR-R) 3.5.4. Mentalization - Reading the Mind in the Eyes (RME) 42-44 3.5.5. Demographic information 44 3.5.6. Psychometric properties of the questionnaires 44 3.6. Procedure 44 3.6.1. Clinical sample 44-45 3.6.2. Non-clinical sample 45 3.6.3. Questionnaire order effects 46 3.7. Statistical analysis 47 3.8. Ethical Aspects of the research 48-49 4. RESULTS 49-70 4.1. Non-clinical sample 49-65 4.1.1 Sample characteristics 49-51 4.1.2 Descriptive statistics and norm comparisons - study measures 51-52 4.1.3 Hypothesis testing 52-65 4.1.3.1 Research question 1 – Exploring the relationship between 52-53 transliminality and interpersonal difficulties 4.1.3.2. Research question 2: Does transliminality mediate the effects 53-58 of mentalization and attachment hyperactivation on IPD? 4.1.3.3. Additional hypothesis: Each predictor variable will be related 58-65 to different aspects IPD 4.2. Clinical sample 65-70 4.2.1 Sample characteristics 65-66 4.2.2 Descriptive statistics and norm comparisons - study measures 66-67 4.2.3. Hypothesis testing 67-70 4.2.3.1. Research question 1 – Exploring the relationship between 67-70 transliminality and interpersonal difficulties 4.2.3.2. Summary of clinical sample results 70 4 5. DISCUSSION 71-92 5.1. Summary of findings 71-73 5.1.1. Non-clinical sample 71-73 5.1.1.1. Evaluating the data in relation to the hypothesised model 71 5.1.1.2. Additional analysis of IIP-32 sub-scales 72 5.1.2. Clinical sample 73 5.2. Relating the findings to existing theory 73-85 5.2.1. What the findings reveal about the mentalization-based model 73-78 of IPD 5.2.1.1 The ‘loose coupling’ of mentalization and attachment 73-76 hyperactivation 5.2.1.2. Why was transliminality not related to mentalization and 76-78 attachment hyperactivity? 5.2.3. Explaining the positive relationship between transliminality and 78-85 IPD 5.2.3.1. Transliminality and thick and thin-skinned narcissistic states 78-79 5.2.3.2. Transliminality and Kernberg’s continuum 79-80 5.2.3.3. The role of transliminality in adaptive and pathological 80-85 mechanisms 5.3. Clinical Implications 85-88 5.4. Further research 88-90 5.5. Methodological limitations 90-92 5.6. Conclusion 92 REFERENCES 92-112 APPENDICES 113-134 Appendix A: Invitation to participate letter (clinical sample) 113 Appendix B: Debriefing sheet 114 Appendix C: Invitation to participate (non-clinical sample) 115 Appendix D: NHS ethical approval confirmation letter 116-119 Appendix E: University of East London ethical approval confirmation 120-122 letter Appendix F: Participant Information Sheet (clinical sample) 124-125 Appendix G: Participant Consent Form (clinical sample) 125 Appendix H: Participant Consent Form (non-clinical) 126 Appendix I: NHS Research and Development Approval (Site 1) 127-129 Appendix J: NHS Participant Identification Centre (PIC) approval 130 letter Appendix K. UEL ethical approval of amendments relating to the 131-134 recruitment of the non-clinical sample 5 Acknowledgements I would like to thank James Walsh and Martyn Baker for their enthusiasm and excellent supervisory support. I would also like to thank Brian Solts for his support and assistance with recruiting participants from the NHS services. Most importantly, I would like to express my gratitude to all of the people who gave up their time to participate in this study. 6 ABSTRACT Despite a growing literature supporting the view of a dynamic unconscious, there have been few attempts to empirically investigate the role of unconscious processes in relation to existing models of psychopathology. In this study, the concept of transliminality (defined as ‘a hypothesised tendency for psychological material (trans) thresholds (limines) into or out of consciousness’, Thalbourne & Houran, 2000, p. 853) and a standardised self-report measure of this construct were used to explore relationships between unconscious processes and interpersonal difficulties. Transliminality and two of the central components of the mentalization-based model of interpersonal difficulties – attachment hyperactivity and mentalization, were examined. The mentalization model was seen as a fitting context for this investigation given that mentalization draws on attachment theory, psychoanalytic principles and makes reference to unconscious processes. Using standardised self-report measures this study attempted to answer two research questions. Firstly, is transliminality related to interpersonal difficulties and what is the nature of this relationship? Secondly, does transliminality mediate the effects of mentalization and attachment hyperactivation on interpersonal difficulties? These questions were investigated using a clinical sample recruited from two NHS specialist adult psychological therapies services (N = 16) receiving referrals for those between the age of 18 to 65 and a non-clinical sample (N = 60). The data from the non-clinical sample revealed that transliminality, mentalization and attachment hyperactivity were all predictors of interpersonal difficulties. The variance uniquely accounted for by each predictor and the lack of relationships between them, was seen as a reflection of these constructs representing distinct psychological processes that contribute to interpersonal difficulties.
Recommended publications
  • Consciousness and Cognition
    Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Consciousness and Cognition journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/concog Absorption and spiritual experience: A review of evidence and potential mechanisms Michael Lifshitza,b,1, Michiel van Elkc,1, T.M. Luhrmanna,⁎ a Department of Anthropology, Stanford University, USA b Culture, Mind, and Brain Program, McGill University, Canada c Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Some people seem to have a ‘talent’ for spiritual experience: they readily sense the presence of Absorption supernatural beings, receive special messages from God, and report intense feelings of self- Spiritual experiences transcendence, awe and wonder. Here we review converging strands of evidence to argue that the Prayer trait of 'absorption' captures a general proclivity for having spiritual experiences. Participants Mystical experiences scoring highly on the Tellegen Absorption Scale report vivid experiences of hearing God's voice Individual differences during prayer, intense mystical experiences in response to psychedelics or placebo brain-stimu- Hypnosis Mental imagery lation, and strong feelings of presence and transcendence when confronted with natural beauty, Agency virtual reality, or music. Several mechanisms may help to explain the relationship between ab- Voice hearing sorption and spiritual experience. We suggest that absorption captures an experiential mindset Visions that intensifies inner and outer sensory experience in ways that reflect both prior expectation and novel sensory engagement. It seems to enable that which must be imagined to feel more real. 1. Introduction One of the enduring puzzles in ethnography and history is that everywhere in the world we find spiritual experts—shamans, priests, sorcerers, and sadhus—and yet nowhere in the world is there a society in which all are experts.
    [Show full text]
  • Transliminality and Transcendence
    TRANSLIMINALITY AND TRANSCENDENCE: AN EXPLORATION OF THE CONNECTIONS AMONG CREATIVITY, MYSTICAL EXPERIENCE, AND PSYCHO“PATHOLOGY” By Laura Rosser Kreiselmaier Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Vanderbilt University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Religion May, 2016 Nashville, Tennessee Approved: Volney P. Gay, PhD Sohee Park, PhD John S. McClure, PhD Bonnie J. Miller-McLemore, PhD Copyright © 2016 Laura Rosser Kreiselmaier All Rights Reserved ii GRATITUDE & ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am deeply grateful to my dissertation “cloud of witnesses,” some of whom have been an integral part of this project, others of whom have cheered me on from the sidelines, and still others of whom have unknowingly inspired me from the shadows of their own paths. My heartfelt thanks is expressed: To my committee members, Professors Volney P. Gay, Sohee Park, John S. McClure, and Bonnie J. Miller-McLemore, who embody not only a remarkable breadth of interdisciplinary scholarship but also the invaluable gift of humankindness. And to Evon O. Flesberg and Bruce Rogers-Vaughn, who first inspired and trained me in our sacred profession. To the Tennessee Association of Pastoral Therapists, for supporting the vital work of pastoral psychotherapy and those who share this calling, and for turning an inauspicious bend in the road into a new pathway for state licensure. Especially to Donna Scott for your generous mentoring and friendship, Ron McDonald for your creativity and vision, and Dick Bruehl for your clinical wisdom (how wonderful to have a supervisor in the direct lineage of Anton Boisen!). To Charles Davidson and Cliff Edwards, who flew me to Richmond for the honor of participating in their April 2015 Van Gogh panel to speak on transliminality.
    [Show full text]
  • Hypnotizability, Personality Traits, and the Propensity to Experience Alterations of Consciousness
    2014, Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 292-307 Hypnotizability, Personality Traits, and The Propensity to Experience Alterations of Consciousness Etzel Cardeña1 & Devin B. Terhune2 1Center for Research on Consciousness and Anomalous Psychology (CERCAP), Department of Psychology, Lund University, Sweden 2 Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK Corresponding address: Etzel Cardeña, Ph. D. Thorsen Professor, Department of Psychology Center for Research on Consciousness and Anomalous Psychology (CERCAP) Lund University Paradisgatan 5P Lund, 223 50 Sweden Telephone number: (0)46 46 2228770 Fax (department of psychology) 46 46 222 4209 Email: [email protected] 1 Hypnotizability and Personality Traits Abstract How hypnotizability relates to personality traits other than absorption has received scant attention even though hypnotizability exhibits clear and stable individual differences. Two personality constructs particularly germane to hypnotizability are mental boundaries and self-transcendence, since they seem to index the propensity to experience alterations in consciousness. We conducted two studies to evaluate their relations with behavioral and experiential measures of hypnotizability, and absorption. In study 1 (N = 112 US participants), experiential, but not behavioral, measures of hypnotizability, correlated with the personal (e.g., porosity in interpersonal relations or in states of consciousness), but not the world (e.g., opinions of others), subscale of boundary thinness and with absorption. In Study 2 (N = 84 Swedish participants), self-transcendence as a whole, as well as two of its three subscales (self-forgetfulness and transpersonal identification) related to hypnotizability, especially as measured experientially. Absorption correlated with an index of experiential hypnotizability in both studies, but was not reliably related to behavioral hypnotizability.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 21 Paranormal Belief, Infrasound, Transliminality And
    Page 1 of 21 Paranormal belief, infrasound, transliminality and anomalous perceptions Alison Ashurst Supervised by: Kenneth Drinkwater April 2015 Page 2 of 21 Paranormal belief, infrasound, transliminality and anomalous perceptions ABSTRACT The present study investigated whether level of paranormal belief and transliminality, and the use of suggestion and infrasound, had an effect on participants’ expectations of the likelihood of paranormal phenomena and associated emotions. Participants were provided with a short written history of the building with either the suggestion that the building was haunted or that is was no simply disused. They then watched a short video walkthrough of the building and were then required to answer a series of questionnaires (Revised Paranormal Belief Scale; Exploring and Visiting; Environmental Perceptions and Phenomena; Opinions and Previous Experiences; Revised Transliminality Scale). Half of the participants were subject to a low level of infrasound played into the experiment room via equipment set up in an adjacent room. Results showed no significant effects for suggestion or infrasound, however, level of paranormal belief did show a significant effect on all scales. Paranormal belief is also shown to be a reliable predictor, whereas transliminality does not. Suggestions for future research are also discussed. KEY PARANORMAL SUGGESTION INFRASOUND TRANSLIMINAL PERCEPTION WORDS: BELIEF Page 3 of 21 Introduction The term ‘paranormal’ can be defined as “Beyond the normal” or “…inexplicable by the laws of science or reason.” (Colman, 2009: 550). Irwin (2009) stated that it is phenomena that cannot be explained by science but is generated and endorsed by people that would normally be considered capable of rational thought.
    [Show full text]
  • Correlates of Paranormal Beliefs, I: Schizotypy
    CORRELATES OF PARANORMAL BELIEFS, I: SCHIZOTYPY By Michael P. Kelley ABSTRACT: Previous research has indicated a consistent relationship between paranormal belief and schizotypy. The present study sought to replicate these findings, and to explore the differential associations of various dimensions of paranormal belief with the various dimensions of schizotypy. Tobacyk’s Paranormal Beliefs Scale (PBS), the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire (SPQ), the STA, and the Magical Ideation and Perceptual Aberration scales were administered to a sample of 657 undergraduate students. Item-level factor analyses of the PBS and the SPQ each yielded 5 factors. Total scores on Tobacyk’s PBS were significantly associated with scores on the STA, the Magical Ideation and Perceptual Aberration scales, total SPQ scores, and the Reality Distortion and Paranoid/Suspiciousness factors of the SPQ. The Reality Distortion dimension of schizotypy was more strongly and consistently related to paranormal beliefs than the other factors of schizotypy. All 5 factors of paranormal belief were significantly positively correlated with the STA and the SPQ Reality Distortion factor. Athough general measures of paranormal belief and schizotypy are significantly related, the association of paranormal beliefs with schizotypy varies across different facets of paranormal belief, and does not entail all aspects of schizotypy. Keywords: paranormal beliefs, schizotypy, reality distortion, magical ideation Belief in the paranormal in the general population is highly prevalent (Ede,
    [Show full text]
  • Conceptualizing Transliminality As
    CoNcnpruALrzING Tn¡.xsr,rurlNAr,rrY ¿.s FuNcrroNAL Rncur.lrroN oF INrnR¡.crrow AuoNc Bn¡¡N RpcroNs By J¡.nrcs Houru,N, M.A. Cr,rNIc¡,L Psvcnor-ocv TnnsrS SUBMITTED FoR THE DoCnnB Or DOCTOn or PIITT,OSOPHY Dpp¡.nrvttNT oF PsvcHor-ocv, UNtvnRSITY or Alnl-lmrt Aonr.¡.ron, Souttt Ausrnar,r¡. Aucusr 2003 Sr¡,rpunNt Ihis thesis contains no material which has been accepted for the award of any other d.egree or diploma in any university, and, to the best of my lcnowledge, contains no material previously publíshed or written by another person, except where due references have been given in the text. I give consent to this copy of my thesis, when deposited in the Barr Smith Library, being made available for loan and photocopying. Signed, August 2003 James Houran Anomalistic P sychology Res earch Unit D ep ar tment of P sy ch ol o gY University of Adelaide l1 DnnrcarroN AND AcxNowI,EDGMENTS This thesis is dedicated to my loving parents, Michael G. and Alice R. Houran. It was completed due the collective support and encouragement of many individuals. First and foremost, my family sacrificed much in the way of time and attention during its preparation. My son was especially affected, as he is well aware that he missed out on an amazitgtrip to Scotland! Drs. Michael A. Thalbourne (University of Adelaide), Peter S. Delin (University of Adelaide), and Larry F. Hughes (Southern Illinois University School of Medicine) were tremendously gracious in sharing their expertise with me and for serving as the supervisors of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Psychology of Mystical Experience: Muḥammad and Siddhārtha,” Anthropology of Consciousness, 30(2): 152–178
    The final version is published in Anthropology of Consciousness. The final version is copyrighted by the American Anthropological Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/anoc.12116 Galadari, Abdulla (2019) “Psychology of Mystical Experience: Muḥammad and Siddhārtha,” Anthropology of Consciousness, 30(2): 152–178. Psychology of Mystical Experience: Muḥammad and Siddhārtha ABDULLA GALADA RI Khalifa University of Science & Technology [email protected] ABSTRATCT A comparison between Muḥammad and Siddhārtha’s psychological states is made to identify how they had their mystical experiences and how their presuppositions and personalities shaped their interpretation of these experiences. Muḥammad’s mystical experience appeared to be based on an altered state of consciousness. Siddhārtha’s teachings include that one must not have blind faith and remain open to various truths. These teachings may reflect that he was high in openness to experience, which may have fortified him from becoming delusional. While mystical experiences may have pathological overlaps, they could be categorized in a similar way to psychological states. Yet, mindful presuppositions and personality traits, especially from within openness to experience spectrum, are what make perceptions of these experiences diverse. keywords: Buddhism, Islam, mystical experience, personality, psychology INTRODUCTION This article looks into the descriptions of mystical experience by Muḥam- mad, according to Muslim tradition, when he first described receiving divine revelations and compares it with the experience of Siddhārtha, also known as the Buddha, according to the Pāli canon. A comparison of these experiences may suggest that they have a similar neuropsychological basis but that the individual’s presuppositions and personality cause a difference in the interpre- tation of these experiences.
    [Show full text]
  • Belief in the Paranormal: Measurement Development and Evaluation
    Belief in the Paranormal: Measurement Development and Evaluation. By Kenneth Graham Drinkwater A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the Manchester Metropolitan University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Department of Psychology The Manchester Metropolitan University November 2017 1 2 Contents Page Number Contents pages p3-12 List of tables p10-12 Acknowledgements p13 Abstract p15 Brief outline p17 Thesis aims p17 Primary aims of the research p17-18 Secondary aims of the research p18 Chapter 1. Understanding paranormal beliefs: the main associates’ p19-57 1. Introduction p19 1.0. Preamble p19 1.1. What is the paranormal? P19-30 1.1.2. Characterisations of the paranormal p20 1.1.3. Individual accounts p20 1.1.4. Claims p20-21 1.1.5. Media p21-22 1.1.6. Culture p22-23 1.1.7. Beliefs and common measures of paranormal beliefs p24-25 1.1.8. Prevalent self-report measures p25-27 1.2. Paranormal belief - definitions p27-30 1.2.1. Summary p31 1.3. Beliefs and associates p31-33 1.3.1. Belief systems p33-34 1.3.2. Magical thinking/ideation p34-35 1.3.3. Intelligence and paranormal belief p35-37 1.3.4. Cognitive correlates and belief p37-38 1.3.5. Reasoning and problem solving p38-39 1.3.6. Delusional ideation and paranormal belief p39-40 1.3.7. Transliminality and paranormal belief p40-42 1.3.8. Schizotypy and belief in the paranormal p42-43 1.4. The role of disbelief (scepticism) p44-45 3 1.4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Areview of the Ganzfeld Work at Gothenburg University
    1 Journal of the Society for Psychical Research, 2000, 64, 1 -15. A REVIEW OF THE GANZFELD WORK AT GOTHENBURG UNIVERSITY BY ADRIAN PARKER1 ABSTRACT The results of five standard ganzfeld studies and one multiple target ganzfeld (the serial ganzfeld) study are reported. The standard ganzfeld studies form a highly significant and consistent data base with an overall hit-rate of 36% (40% in the case of auditory monitored studies) and a mean effect size of .25 (.34 in the case of the monitored studies). This database has been used to study psychological correlates of psi in terms of psychometric tests. The most successful of these tests are the Australian Sheep Goat Scale, the Magical Ideation Scale, and ”Feeling” scores on the Myers-Briggs Inventory. Other scales that were used as predictors of psi-scores with varying degrees of success included the Transliminality Scale, the Defence Mechanism Test, and the Tellegen Absorption Scale. A further investigation suggests on the basis of confidence ratings made before and after ganzfeld relaxation, that there may be some awareness of the psi-content of the imagery generated during the ganzfeld state. The report includes a review of current work in developing the ganzfeld into a portable digital technique for process-orientated research. The publication in a major psychological journal of the Bem & Honorton (1994) review of the psi-ganzfeld work, created considerable optimism that parapsychology had finally been able to provide the much sought after replicable psi-experiment. At that point in time, it seemed that a gauntlet had effectively thrown down to orthodox psychologists, challenging them to take up the autoganzfeld technique and go further with it.
    [Show full text]
  • Transliminality
    The Concept of Transliminality The Origins of Transliminality • Psychologists have long speculated about threshold processes (see James, 1982; Myers, 1903; Usher & Burt, 1909; Freud, 1933; etc.). • The origins of transliminality trace back to 1991, when it was first conceptualized as “an openness or receptiveness to impulses and experiences whose sources are in preconscious (or unconscious) processes” (Thalbourne, 1991, pp. 181-182). This conceptualization does not account for the loss of this material to the subconscious or unconscious mind. • While many representations in consciousness ultimately have their origins in preconscious processes, the transliminal material represented in consciousness is recognized as having three specific sources: the ‘subliminal’ mind (the ‘subconscious’ or ‘unconscious’), the ‘supraliminal’ mind (for example, states of consciousness and conscious activity), and the external environment. • Empirical evidence for a factor that was to become known as transliminality arose from a study by Thalbourne and Delin (1994). They administered a series of tests to samples of manic-depressives, schizophrenics and university students. It was found that scores on belief in the paranormal correlated with scores on measures of creative personality, mystical experience, magical ideation, and history of manic-like and depressive experience. • Principal components analysis (a form of factor analysis) was conducted, and a single factor was identified, which was called transliminality. • Transliminality is currently defined as “a hypothesised tendency for psychological material to cross (trans ) thresholds ( limines ) into or out of consciousness” (Thalbourne & Houran, 2000, p. 853). This definition is in current use, and essentially describes the nature and process of transliminality. • Subsequent “top-down purification” 1 analyses of this measure (Lange, Thalbourne, Houran & Storm, 2000) reduced the 29-item Transliminality scale to 17 items.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Research on Fantasy Proneness and Its Correlates 2000–2018: a Meta-Analysis
    Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice © 2021 American Psychological Association ISSN: 2326-5523 https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000272 Empirical Research on Fantasy Proneness and Its Correlates 2000–2018: A Meta-Analysis Harald Merckelbach1, Henry Otgaar1, 2, and Steven Jay Lynn3 1 Forensic Psychology Section, Maastricht University 2 Faculty of Law, Catholic University Leuven 3 Department of Psychology, State University of New York We reviewed articles that appeared between 2000 and 2018 and that addressed fantasy proneness as measured by the Creative Experiences Questionnaire (CEQ) or the Inventory of Childhood Memories and Imaginings (ICMI). We searched Google Scholar to identify relevant articles and used the Hunter–Schmidt method to meta-analyze the correlates of fantasy proneness. We identified 132 articles describing 139 samples that together included 24,007 research participants. Effect sizes were large (r’s > .50) for hallucinatory experiences, magical ideation, perceptual aberration, dissociation, and excessive daydreaming. Contrary to the popular idea that childhood trauma is a prominent precursor of fantasy proneness, we found that the effect sizes for self-reported trauma were small, as was also the case for depression, anxiety, and memory illusions (r’s < .30). Strides in this research area can be made when future studies move beyond the fantasy proneness-trauma link to test causal models regarding the antecedents of maladaptive fantasizing. Keywords: fantasy proneness, creative experiences questionnaire, inventory of childhood memories and imaginings, dissociation, schizotypy Supplemental materials: https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000272.supp Wilson and Barber’s (1983) pioneering study rewarding, and tightly interwoven into the fabric of highly hypnotizable persons first identified a of their everyday lives.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucid Dreaming, Nightmares, and Sleep Paralysis Associations With
    Drinkwater, KG and Denovan, A and Dagnall, N (2020) Lucid Dreaming, Nightmares, and Sleep Paralysis: Associations With Reality Testing Deficits and Paranormal Experience/Belief. Frontiers in Psychology, 11. Downloaded from: https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/625591/ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00471 Please cite the published version https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk fpsyg-11-00471 March 17, 2020 Time: 16:56 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 18 March 2020 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00471 Lucid Dreaming, Nightmares, and Sleep Paralysis: Associations With Reality Testing Deficits and Paranormal Experience/Belief Kenneth G. Drinkwater*, Andrew Denovan and Neil Dagnall Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom Focusing on lucid dreaming, this paper examined relationships between dissociated experiences related to rapid eye movement (REM) sleep (lucid dreaming, nightmares, Edited by: Roumen Kirov, and sleep paralysis), reality testing, and paranormal experiences/beliefs. The study Institute of Neurobiology (BAS), comprised a UK-based online sample of 455 respondents (110 males, 345 females, Bulgaria Mean age = 34.46 years, SD = 15.70), who had all previously experienced Reviewed by: lucid dreaming. Respondents completed established self-report measures assessing Mark Blagrove, Swansea University, United Kingdom control within lucid dreaming, experience and frequency of nightmares, incidence Axel Steiger, of sleep paralysis, proneness to reality testing deficits (Inventory of Personality Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, Germany Organization subscale, IPO-RT), subjective experience of receptive psi and life after Serge Brand, death (paranormal experience), and paranormal belief. Analysis comprised tests of University Psychiatric Clinic Basel, correlational and predictive relationships between sleep-related outcomes, IPO-RT Switzerland scores, and paranormal measures.
    [Show full text]