Modeling the Formation of the Earth's Atmosphere by Hydrodynamic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Modeling the Formation of the Earth's Atmosphere by Hydrodynamic Origin of the Earth and Moon Conference 4102.pdf MODELING THE FORMATION OF THE EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE BY HYDRODYNAMIC ESCAPE AND PLANETARY OUTGASSING. R. O. Pepin, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis MN 55455, USA. Accretion of lunar- to Mars-sized terrestrial Models of this kind have had some success in planet embryos is believed to have occurred on accounting for the details of terrestrial noble gas timescales of »105 years in the presence of nebular mass distributions [3,6]. However, they are not with- gas [1,2]. Mechanisms for trapping nebular (“solar”) out problems. “Solar” isotopic distributions in the noble gases in these embryos include occlusion of initial terrestrial reservoirs are taken to be those ambient gases in the planetesimals accreted to form measured in the solar wind. Although current esti- them, and, probably more important, efficient ad- mates for the isotopic compositions of solar-wind Ne, sorption of gravitationally condensed nebular gases Ar, and Kr are compatible with those required in the on embryo surfaces once they had grown to modeling for Earth’s primordial noble gas invento- ~Mercury size [3]. During the following ~100–200 ries, this assumption that the wind correctly repre- m.y. of growth through the “giant-impact” stage sents the composition of the nebular source supply- [1,4] to a fully assembled planet, a coaccreting pri- ing these gases to the early Earth is not strictly valid mordial atmosphere is likely to develop by impact- for Xe. Generating the isotope ratios of terrestrial degassing of colliding embryos and inward-scattered nonradiogenic Xe by fractionation in hydrodynamic icy planetesimals, and by gravitational capture of escape requires an initial composition called U-Xe, nebular gases if the gas phase of the nebula had not which appears to be isotopically identical to meas- yet fully dissipated. A planet accreting in this way ured solar-wind Xe except for sharply lower abun- acquires external (atmospheric) and interior volatile dances of the two heaviest isotopes [10]. Originally reservoirs, the latter probably sited primarily in its an inferred component [3], U-Xe-like compositions deeply buried embryo since increasing collisional have since been found in basaltic achondrites [11]. energies as the planet grows beyond the embryo But even though the existence of U-Xe in the early stage promote efficient impact-degassing of projec- solar nebula now seems confirmed, we are still left tile volatiles to the atmospheric reservoir [5]. Both with the puzzling question of why it differs isotopi- reservoirs are arguably dominated by isotopically cally from the Xe composition in the solar wind and solar noble gases. presumably also in the Sun. The observation that nonradiogenic Ne, Ar, Kr, Another unresolved issue has to do with Xe de- and Xe in Earth’s current atmosphere are all isotopi- gassing from the Earth’s deep interior reservoir. In cally heavier than their solar counterparts is an im- the models discussed here, escape fractionation of portant clue to the nature of the processes that subse- the planet’s primordial atmosphere generates the quently acted on these primordial planetary reser- abundance and nonradiogenic isotope ratios of pres- voirs, and is central to evolutionary models in which ent-day atmospheric Xe, and also leaves behind the atmosphere was driven from solar progenitors to highly fractionated residual abundances of the its present compositional state by energetic hydrody- lighter noble gases. Mixing of these residuals with namic escape of the coaccreted atmosphere, followed degassed solar-composition Kr, Ar, and Ne repli- by mixing of its isotopically fractionated residue with cates their present elemental and isotopic composi- gases evolved from the interior [3,6]. Hydrodynamic tions. But only minor amounts of degassed Xe could escape of a hydrogen-rich atmosphere [7] is powered have been added to the post-escape atmosphere with- in these models by absorption of intense extreme- out perturbing its isotopic distribution, and so one of ultraviolet (EUV) radiation from the young evolving two assumptions must be made about the Xe initially Sun [3,8] or by energy deposited in a giant Moon- present in the planetary-embryo reservoir. Either it forming impact [6,9]. Required H2 inventories range was preferentially outgassed very early by fractional from the equivalent of ~1–2 wt% water in terrestrial degassing [12,13], well before the bulk of the lighter accretional materials, for escape driven solely by noble gases, and therefore most of it was already solar EUV [3], to roughly a factor of 10 less for im- present in the primary atmosphere prior to hydrody- pact-powered escape [6]. The atmospheric H2 is namic escape, or it was stabilized and segregated in plausibly produced by reduction of accreted water on some way deep in the planetary interior and thus was metallic Fe during planetary growth. never transported to the atmosphere. The suggestion that deeply sited Xe might have metallized and al- Origin of the Earth and Moon Conference 4102.pdf MODELING FORMATION OF EARTH’S ATMOSPHERE: R. O. Pepin loyed with iron [3] is not supported by recent high- ment of the Ar/Ne elemental ratio, by a factor of ~20 pressure measurements on the Xe-Fe system [14]. relative to the solar-wind ratio, in the EPR source The possibility that the missing Xe ultimately wound reservoir [20]. This is close to the mean fractionation up in the Earth’s metallic core is not entirely dead, factor seen in laboratory adsorption experiments however: Jephcoat [15] has proposed a novel (data summarized and referenced in [3]), suggesting mechanism in which microclusters of dense crystal- that the interior noble gas reservoir was indeed line Xe — a solid throughout much of the mantle populated by adsorption of nebular gases on Earth’s where its melting temperature is calculated to lie accretional embryo rather than by solar-wind im- above the geotherm — may have been entrained by plantation and retention in proto-Earth materials percolating iron melts near the deep embryo reser- (where the Ar/Ne fractionation factor would be ex- voir and transported into the core during core for- pected to be ~1). It is prudent to note that this con- mation. clusion assumes that noble gases are not elementally One consequence of this modeling approach is fractionated during their transport from a deep inte- that noble gases presently evolving from the unde- rior reservoir to ocean basalt source regions. pleted mantle have their principal source in whatever References: [1] Wetherill G. W. (1990) Annu. is left of the primordial accretional embryo of the Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 18, 205. [2] Wetherill G. W. planet after core formation had penetrated, fractured, and Stewart G. R. (1993) Icarus, 106, 190. [3] Pepin and overturned it, and thus they should display solar R. O. (1991) Icarus, 92, 2. [4] Wetherill G. W. isotopic compositions. A central question for atmos- (1992) Icarus, 100, 307. [5] Ahrens T. J. (1990) in pheric formation and evolution, as well as for the Origin of the Earth, p.†211, Oxford Univ. [6] Pepin source, incorporation mechanism, and transport of R. O. (1997) Icarus, 126, 148. [7] Hunten D. M. et noble gases in the Earth, is therefore whether solar- al. (1987) Icarus, 69, 532. [8] Walter F. M. et al. like noble gases are present in the mantle. There are (1988) Astron. J., 96, 297. [9] Benz W. and Cam- strong indications in the MORB database that this is eron A. G. W. (1990) in Origin of the Earth, p. 61, indeed the case for He and Ne [16,17]. But the ob- Oxford Univ. [10] Pepin R. O. et al. (1995) GCA, servational problem has been that solar isotopic sig- 59, 4997. [11] Eugster O. et al. (1994) in Noble Gas natures, which for Ar and Xe differ significantly Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry, p. 1, Terra Sci., from atmospheric compositions, have appeared only Tokyo. [12] Zhang Y. and Zindler A. (1989) JGR, subtly if at all in analyses of the heavier noble gases 94, 13719. [13] Tolstikhin I. N. and O’Nions R. K. in mantle-derived samples; their nonradiogenic iso- (1994) Chem. Geol., 115, 1. [14] Caldwell W. A. et tope ratios have generally been found to be indistin- al. (1997) Science, 227, 930. [15] Jephcoat A. P. guishable or only slightly offset from those in air — (1998) Nature, 393, 355. [16] Honda M. et al. (1993) a consequence, one now suspects, of massive air- GCA, 57, 859. [17] Farley K. A. and Poreda R. J. derived contamination by post-collection adsorption, (1993) EPSL, 114, 325. [18] Valbracht P. J. et al. seawater-magma interaction, subduction, or combi- (1997) EPSL, 150, 399. [19] Niedermann S. et al. nations of all of these. The first promising isotopic (1997) GCA, 61, 2697. [20] Pepin R. O. (1998) Na- evidence for a solar-like Ar component appeared in ture, 394, 664. new analyses of basalt glasses from the Loihi Seamount [18]. Shortly thereafter, Niedermann et al. [19] published results of measurements of Ne and Ar isotopes in a suite of MORB samples from the south- ern East Pacific Rise (EPR). Their data, when plot- ted on a 38Ar/36Ar vs. 20Ne/22Ne diagram, define a remarkably coherent mixing curve between air- derived Ne and Ar and a second component isotopi- cally consistent with current estimates for the solar wind [20]. A substantial fraction of the Loihi data [18] also fall along this mixing curve, and the rest are consistent with contamination by variably frac- tionated air. These observations greatly strengthen the case for the presence of solar Ar, and by infer- ence solar Kr and Xe as well, in the Earth’s mantle.
Recommended publications
  • Water on Venus: Implications of Theearly Hydrodynamic Escape
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 5, EPSC2010-288, 2010 European Planetary Science Congress 2010 c Author(s) 2010 Water on Venus: Implications of theEarly Hydrodynamic Escape C. Gillmann (1), E. Chassefière (2) and P. Lognonné (1) (1) Institut de Physique du Globe (IPGP), Paris, France, ([email protected]) (2) CNRS/UPS UMR 8148 IDES Interactions et Dynamique des Environnements de Surface, Paris, France Abstract toward a common origin for those three atmospheres and a usual theory is that these atmospheres are In order to study the evolution of the primitive secondary, created by the degassing of volatiles from atmosphere of Venus, we developed a time the bodies that constituted the early planet. The dependent model of hydrogen hydrodynamic escape atmosphere of Venus could then represent a primitive state of the evolution of terrestrial. Moreover, Mars powered by solar EUV (Extreme UV) flux and solar and the Earth possess reservoirs of water at present- wind, and accounting for oxygen frictional escape day whereas Venus seems to be dry. The early We study specifically the isotopic fractionation of evolution of terrestrial planets and the effects of noble gases resulting from hydrodynamic escape. hydrodynamic escape might explain this observation The fractionation’s primary cause is the effect of by the removal of most of the initial water on Venus. diffusive/gravitational separation between the homopause and the base of the escape. Heavy noble 2. Results and Scenario gases such as Kr and Xe are not fractionated. Ar is only marginally fractionated whereas Ne is We study the evolution of the primitive atmosphere moderately fractionated. of Venus and investigate the possibility of an early We also take into account oxygen dragged off habitable Venus with a possible liquid water ocean on along with hydrogen by hydrodynamic process.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Atmosphere of Pluto As Observed by New Horizons G
    The Atmosphere of Pluto as Observed by New Horizons G. Randall Gladstone,1,2* S. Alan Stern,3 Kimberly Ennico,4 Catherine B. Olkin,3 Harold A. Weaver,5 Leslie A. Young,3 Michael E. Summers,6 Darrell F. Strobel,7 David P. Hinson,8 Joshua A. Kammer,3 Alex H. Parker,3 Andrew J. Steffl,3 Ivan R. Linscott,9 Joel Wm. Parker,3 Andrew F. Cheng,5 David C. Slater,1† Maarten H. Versteeg,1 Thomas K. Greathouse,1 Kurt D. Retherford,1,2 Henry Throop,7 Nathaniel J. Cunningham,10 William W. Woods,9 Kelsi N. Singer,3 Constantine C. C. Tsang,3 Rebecca Schindhelm,3 Carey M. Lisse,5 Michael L. Wong,11 Yuk L. Yung,11 Xun Zhu,5 Werner Curdt,12 Panayotis Lavvas,13 Eliot F. Young,3 G. Leonard Tyler,9 and the New Horizons Science Team 1Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA 2University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78249, USA 3Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302, USA 4National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, Space Science Division, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 5The Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD 20723, USA 6George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030, USA 7The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA 8Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence Institute, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA 9Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 10Nebraska Wesleyan University, Lincoln, NE 68504 11California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 12Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, 37191 Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany 13Groupe de Spectroscopie Moléculaire et Atmosphérique, Université Reims Champagne-Ardenne, 51687 Reims, France *To whom correspondence should be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Diffusion-Limited Escape/ the Atmospheric Hydrogen Budget/ Hydrodynamic Escape
    41st Saas-Fee Course From Planets to Life 3-9 April 2011 Lecture 6--Hydrogen escape, Part 2 Diffusion-limited escape/ The atmospheric hydrogen budget/ Hydrodynamic escape J. F. Kasting Diffusion-limited escape • On Earth, hydrogen escape is limited by diffusion through the homopause • Escape rate is given by (Walker, 1977*) esc(H) bi ftot/Ha where bi = binary diffusion parameter for H (or H2) in air Ha = atmospheric (pressure) scale height ftot = total hydrogen mixing ratio in the stratosphere *J.C.G. Walker, Evolution of the Atmosphere (1977) • Numerically 19 -1 -1 b i 1.810 cm s (avg. of H and H2 in air) 5 Ha = kT/mg 6.410 cm so 13 -2 -1 esc (H) 2.510 ftot (H) (molecules cm s ) Total hydrogen mixing ratio • In the stratosphere, hydrogen interconverts between various chemical forms • Rate of upward diffusion of hydrogen is determined by the total hydrogen mixing ratio ftot(H) = f(H) + 2 f(H2) + 2 f(H2O) + 4 f(CH4) + … • ftot(H) is nearly constant from the tropopause up to the homopause (i.e., 10-100 km) Total hydrogen mixing ratio Homopause Tropopause Diffusion-limited escape • Let’s put in some numbers. In the lower stratosphere −6 f(H2O) 3-5 ppmv = (3-5)10 −6 f(CH4 ) = 1.6 ppmv = 1.6 10 • Thus −6 −6 ftot (H) = 2 (310 ) + 4 (1.6 10 ) 1.210−5 so the diffusion-limited escape rate is 13 −5 8 -2 -1 esc (H) 2.510 (1.210 ) = 310 cm s Hydrogen budget on the early Earth • For the early earth, we can estimate the atmospheric H2 mixing ratio by balancing volcanic outgassing of H2 (and other reduced gases) with the diffusion-limited escape
    [Show full text]
  • The Longevity of Water Ice on Ganymedes and Europas Around Migrated Giant Planets
    The Astrophysical Journal, 839:32 (9pp), 2017 April 10 https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa67ea © 2017. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. The Longevity of Water Ice on Ganymedes and Europas around Migrated Giant Planets Owen R. Lehmer1, David C. Catling1, and Kevin J. Zahnle2 1 Dept. of Earth and Space Sciences/Astrobiology Program, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; [email protected] 2 NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA Received 2017 February 17; revised 2017 March 14; accepted 2017 March 18; published 2017 April 11 Abstract The gas giant planets in the Solar System have a retinue of icy moons, and we expect giant exoplanets to have similar satellite systems. If a Jupiter-like planet were to migrate toward its parent star the icy moons orbiting it would evaporate, creating atmospheres and possible habitable surface oceans. Here, we examine how long the surface ice and possible oceans would last before being hydrodynamically lost to space. The hydrodynamic loss rate from the moons is determined, in large part, by the stellar flux available for absorption, which increases as the giant planet and icy moons migrate closer to the star. At some planet–star distance the stellar flux incident on the icy moons becomes so great that they enter a runaway greenhouse state. This runaway greenhouse state rapidly transfers all available surface water to the atmosphere as vapor, where it is easily lost from the small moons. However, for icy moons of Ganymede’s size around a Sun-like star we found that surface water (either ice or liquid) can persist indefinitely outside the runaway greenhouse orbital distance.
    [Show full text]
  • Atmospheric Escape and the Evolution of Close-In Exoplanets
    Atmospheric Escape and the Evolution of Close-in Exoplanets James E. Owen Astrophysics Group, Imperial College London, Blackett Laboratory, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK; email: [email protected] Xxxx. Xxx. Xxx. Xxx. YYYY. AA:1{26 Keywords https://doi.org/10.1146/((please add atmospheric evolution, exoplanets, exoplanet composition article doi)) Copyright c YYYY by Annual Reviews. Abstract All rights reserved Exoplanets with substantial Hydrogen/Helium atmospheres have been discovered in abundance, many residing extremely close to their par- ent stars. The extreme irradiation levels these atmospheres experience causes them to undergo hydrodynamic atmospheric escape. Ongoing atmospheric escape has been observed to be occurring in a few nearby exoplanet systems through transit spectroscopy both for hot Jupiters and lower-mass super-Earths/mini-Neptunes. Detailed hydrodynamic calculations that incorporate radiative transfer and ionization chemistry are now common in one-dimensional models, and multi-dimensional calculations that incorporate magnetic-fields and interactions with the arXiv:1807.07609v3 [astro-ph.EP] 6 Jun 2019 interstellar environment are cutting edge. However, there remains very limited comparison between simulations and observations. While hot Jupiters experience atmospheric escape, the mass-loss rates are not high enough to affect their evolution. However, for lower mass planets at- mospheric escape drives and controls their evolution, sculpting the ex- oplanet population we observe today. 1 Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Dependence of the Onset of the Runaway Greenhouse Effect on the Latitudinal Surface Water Distribution of Earth-Like Planets
    Dependence of the onset of the runaway greenhouse effect on the latitudinal surface water distribution of Earth-like planets T. Kodama1,2, A. Nitta1*, H. Genda3, Y. Takao1†, R. O’ishi2, A. Abe-Ouchi2, and Y. Abe1 1 Department of Earth and Planetary Science, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo, 113-0033, Tokyo, Japan 2 Center for Earth Surface System Dynamics, Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8568, Japan 3 Earth-Life Science Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1 Ookayama, Meguro, Tokyo, 152-8551, Japan Corresponding author: Takanori Kodama ([email protected]) (Current addresses) *Tokyo Marine & Nichido Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. †International Affairs Department, Tokyo Institute of Technology, 2-12-1, Ookayama, Meguro, Tokyo, 152-0033, Japan Key Points: • The onset of the runaway greenhouse effect depends strongly on surface water distribution. • The runaway threshold increases as the surface water distribution retreats toward higher latitudes outside the Hadley circulation. • The lower the water amount on a terrestrial planet, the longer the planet remains in habitable condition. 1 Abstract Liquid water is one of the most important materials affecting the climate and habitability of a terrestrial planet. Liquid water vaporizes entirely when planets receive insolation above a certain critical value, which is called the runaway greenhouse threshold. This threshold forms the inner most limit of the habitable zone. Here, we investigate the effects of the distribution of surface water on the runaway greenhouse threshold for Earth-sized planets using a three- dimensional dynamic atmosphere model.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transition from Primary to Secondary Atmospheres on Rocky Exoplanets
    50th Lunar and Planetary Science Conference 2019 (LPI Contrib. No. 2132) 1855.pdf THE TRANSITION FROM PRIMARY TO SECONDARY ATMOSPHERES ON ROCKY EXOPLANETS. M. N. Barnett1 and E. S. Kite1, 1The University of Chicago, Department of Geophysical Sciences. ([email protected]) Introduction: How massive are rocky-exoplanet hydrodynamic escape is illustrated below in Figure 1. atmospheres? For how long do they persist? These ques- tions are compelling in part because an atmosphere is necessary for surface life. Magma oceans on rocky ex- oplanets are significant reservoirs of volatiles, and could potentially assist a planet in maintaining its secondary atmosphere [1,2]. We are modeling the atmospheric evolution of R ≲ 2 REarth exoplanets by combining a magma ocean source model with hydrodynamic escape. This work will go be- yond [2] as we consider generalized volatile outgassing, various starting planetary models (varying distance from the star, and the mass of initial “primary” atmos- phere accreted from the nebula), atmospheric condi- tions, and magma ocean conditions, as well as incorpo- rating solid rock outgassing after magma ocean solidifi- cation. Through this, we aim to predict the mass and lon- Figure 1: Key processes of our magma ocean and hydrody- gevity of secondary atmospheres for various sized rocky namic escape model are shown above. The green circles exoplanets around different stellar type stars and a range marked with a V indicate volatiles that are outgassed from the of orbital periods. We also aim to identify which planet solidifying magma and accumulate in the atmosphere. These volatiles are lost from the exoplanet’s atmosphere through hy- sizes, orbital separations, and stellar host star types are drodynamic escape aided by outflow of hydrogen, which is de- most conducive to maintaining a planet’s secondary at- rived from the nebula.
    [Show full text]
  • Jeans Escape
    TheThe lossloss ofof thethe earlyearly MartianMartian atmosphereatmosphere andand itsits waterwater inventoryinventory duedue toto thethe activeactive youngyoung SunSun H. Lammer (1), Yu. N. Kulikov (2), N. Terada (3), I. Ribas (4), D. Langmayr (1), N. V. Erkaev (5), G. Jaritz (6), H. K. Biernat (1,6) (1) Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Schmiedlstrasse 6, A-8042 Graz, Austria (2) Polar Geophysical Institute (PGI), Russian Academy of Sciences, Khalturina Str. 15, Murmansk, 183010, Russian Federation (3) Solar-Terrestrial Environment Laboratory, Nagoya University, Japan (4) Institute for Space Studies of Catalonia (IEEC) and Instituto de Ciencias del Espacio (CSIC), E-08034, Barcelona, Spain (5) Institute for Computational Modelling, Russian Academy of Sciences, Ru-660036 Krasnoyarsk 36, Russian Federation (6) Institute for Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Meteorology, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 5, A-8010 Graz, Austria IEEC/CSIC TheThe casecase forfor aa wet,wet, warmwarm Mars:Mars: ButBut wherewhere isis allall thethe waterwater andand thethe atmosphereatmosphere ?? ¾ Observations of a network of valleys in crater rich areas of the southern hemisphere suggests that Mars had once a significant hydrologic activity [e.g., Carr Nature 326, 30, 1987; Baker Nature 412, 228, 2001; Carr & Head III JGR 108, E5, 5042, 2003] ¾ Asteroids and comets from beyond 2.5 AU provide the source of Mars’ water, which totals 6 – 27 % of the Earth’s present ocean equivalent to 600 – 2700 m depth on the Martian surface or in the crustal regolith [Lunine et al. Icarus 165, 1, 2003] ¾ Enrichment and fractionation of heavy isotopes [e.g., Pepin Icarus 111, 289, 1994] ¾ Estimations of volumes of potential early Martian water reservoirs from geo-morphological analysis of possible shorelines by MGS images and MOLA data → d ≈ 150 - 160 m [Carr & Head III JGR 108, E5, 5042, 2003] - Stored in present polar caps → d ≈ 20 - 30 m - Surface ground water → d ≈ 80 m ? - Escaped to space → d ≈ 50 - 80 m ? ¾ Early atmosphere ≈ 1 – 5 bars [e.g., Pollack, Kasting et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts of Extreme Solar Systems 4 (Reykjavik, Iceland)
    Abstracts of Extreme Solar Systems 4 (Reykjavik, Iceland) American Astronomical Society August, 2019 100 — New Discoveries scope (JWST), as well as other large ground-based and space-based telescopes coming online in the next 100.01 — Review of TESS’s First Year Survey and two decades. Future Plans The status of the TESS mission as it completes its first year of survey operations in July 2019 will bere- George Ricker1 viewed. The opportunities enabled by TESS’s unique 1 Kavli Institute, MIT (Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States) lunar-resonant orbit for an extended mission lasting more than a decade will also be presented. Successfully launched in April 2018, NASA’s Tran- siting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS) is well on its way to discovering thousands of exoplanets in orbit 100.02 — The Gemini Planet Imager Exoplanet Sur- around the brightest stars in the sky. During its ini- vey: Giant Planet and Brown Dwarf Demographics tial two-year survey mission, TESS will monitor more from 10-100 AU than 200,000 bright stars in the solar neighborhood at Eric Nielsen1; Robert De Rosa1; Bruce Macintosh1; a two minute cadence for drops in brightness caused Jason Wang2; Jean-Baptiste Ruffio1; Eugene Chiang3; by planetary transits. This first-ever spaceborne all- Mark Marley4; Didier Saumon5; Dmitry Savransky6; sky transit survey is identifying planets ranging in Daniel Fabrycky7; Quinn Konopacky8; Jennifer size from Earth-sized to gas giants, orbiting a wide Patience9; Vanessa Bailey10 variety of host stars, from cool M dwarfs to hot O/B 1 KIPAC, Stanford University (Stanford, California, United States) giants. 2 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology TESS stars are typically 30–100 times brighter than (Pasadena, California, United States) those surveyed by the Kepler satellite; thus, TESS 3 Astronomy, California Institute of Technology (Pasadena, Califor- planets are proving far easier to characterize with nia, United States) follow-up observations than those from prior mis- 4 Astronomy, U.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Thermal Loss of Water on Young Planets : the Effect of a Strong Primitive Solar Wind
    Workshop on Early Mars (1997) 3001.pdf THERMAL LOSS OF WATER ON YOUNG PLANETS : THE EFFECT OF A STRONG PRIMITIVE SOLAR WIND. E. Chassefière, Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Université P. et M. Curie, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris Cedex 05, France, (Tel. : 33 (1) 44 27 47 67; Fax : 33 (1) 44 27 62 72; Telex : UPMCSIX 200145F; Electronic mail : [email protected]) This work deals with the problem of thermal escape of heating efficiencies are first considered. The model hydrogen (and, in some cases, both H and O, i.e. water) takes into account the transition to the collisionless state on young planets, in earlier stages of planetary at the exobase through a modified Jeans approach. For evolution. Although it is more specifically focused on the fluid inner planetary corona, the conservation the problem of Venus (and the present lack of oxygen in equations are solved from the base of the expanding Venus atmosphere), it may be also applied to Mars. flow (z»200 km) up to the exobase, generally located at an altitude of »1 planetary radius. Solutions are found, It is first assumed that escape is stimulated only by the for which the flux in the collisional region is equal to solar EUV radiation, which is known to habe been more the Jeans escape flux at the exobase. It is shown that intense in the past (Zahnle and Walker, 1982). From a »2/3 of the escape energy is supplied by energetic simple energetic budget (Chassefière, 1996a), it is neutrals (ENs) formed by charge exchange between shown that, in this case, oxygen produced by escaping H atoms and solar protons in the heliosphere, a photodissociation of water vapor in an earlier stage of fraction of which intercepts the exobase and heats by terrestrial planets evolution may be lost by collision the upper layers of the fluid planetary corona.
    [Show full text]
  • Mars Atmosphere History and Surface Interactions
    Mars Atmosphere History and Surface Interactions David C. Catling University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Conway Leovy University of Washington, Seattle, Washington Cite: DC Catling, C Leovy, in Encyclopedia of the Solar CHAPTER 15 System (Ed. L McFadden, P Weissman), Academic Press, p.301-314, 2006. 1. Introduction Concluding Remarks 2. Volatile Inventories and their History Bibliography 3. Present and Past Climates fundamental question about the surface of Mars is But the present climate does not favor liquid water near A whether it was ever conducive to life in the past, which the surface. Surface temperatures range from about 140 ◦ is related to the broader questions of how the planet’s at- to 310 K. Above freezing temperatures occur only under mosphere evolved over time and whether past climates highly desiccating conditions in a thin layer at the interface supported widespread liquid water. Taken together, geo- between soil and atmosphere, and surface pressure over chemical data and models support the view that much of much of the planet is below the triple point of water [611 the original atmospheric inventory was lost to space before Pascals or 6.11 millibars (mbar)]. If liquid water is present about 3.5 billion years ago. It is widely believed that be- near the surface of Mars today, it must be confined to thin fore this time the climate would have needed to be warmer adsorbed layers on soil particles or highly saline solutions. in order to produce certain geological features, particularly No standing or flowing liquid water, saline or otherwise, has valley networks, but exactly how the early atmosphere pro- been found.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Escape of Atmospheres to Space
    5 Escape of Atmospheres to Space So far, our discussion of atmospheric evolution has circumstances: Jeans’ escape, where individual mol- concentrated on atmosphere and climate fundamentals. ecules evaporate into a collisionless exosphere, and Climate constrains possible life and, as we will see later hydrodynamic escape, which is a bulk outflow with a in this book, the way that climate is thought to have velocity driven by atmospheric heating that induces an evolved can explain many environmental differences upward pressure gradient force (e.g., Johnson et al., between Earth, Venus, and Mars. Climate is closely tied 2013d; Walker, 1982). (ii) Suprathermal (or nonthermal) to the composition of a planet’s atmosphere, which deter- escape is where individual atoms or molecules are mines the greenhouse effect. Consequently, to understand boosted to escape velocity because of chemical reactions how climate has changed over time, we must consider or ionic interactions. Finally, (iii) impact erosion is where how atmospheric composition has evolved. In turn, we atmospheric gases are expelled en masse as a result of must examine how atmospheric gases can be lost. large body impacts, such as the cumulative effect of Gases are lost at an atmosphere’s upper and lower asteroids hits. Of these three types, nonthermal escape is boundaries: the planet’s surface and interplanetary space. generally slow because if it were fast the molecules would In this chapter, we consider the latter. Studies of the Solar collide and the escape would be in the thermal category. System have shown that some bodies are vulnerable to Theory suggests that the two mechanisms that can most atmospheric escape (Hunten, 1990).
    [Show full text]