DOCSLIB.ORG

CASP)-Round V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CASP)-Round V PROTEINS: Structure, Function, and Genetics 53:334–339 (2003) Critical Assessment of Methods of Protein Structure Prediction (CASP)-Round V John Moult,1 Krzysztof Fidelis,2 Adam Zemla,2 and Tim Hubbard3 1Center for Advanced Research in Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, Rockville, Maryland 2Biology and Biotechnology Research Program, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 3Sanger Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom ABSTRACT This article provides an introduc- The role and importance of automated servers in the tion to the special issue of the journal Proteins structure prediction field continue to grow. Another main dedicated to the fifth CASP experiment to assess the section of the issue deals with this topic. The first of these state of the art in protein structure prediction. The articles describes the CAFASP3 experiment. The goal of article describes the conduct, the categories of pre- CAFASP is to assess the state of the art in automatic diction, and the evaluation and assessment proce- methods of structure prediction.16 Whereas CASP allows dures of the experiment. A brief summary of progress any combination of computational and human methods, over the five CASP experiments is provided. Related CAFASP captures predictions directly from fully auto- developments in the field are also described. Proteins matic servers. CAFASP makes use of the CASP target 2003;53:334–339. © 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc. distribution and prediction collection infrastructure, but is otherwise independent. The results of the CAFASP3 experi- Key words: protein structure prediction; communi- ment were also evaluated by the CASP assessors, provid- tywide experiment; CASP ing a comparison of fully automatic and hybrid methods. Full information is available at the Web site (http:// INTRODUCTION www.cs.bgu.ac.il/ϳdfischer/CAFASP3/). This first article This issue of Proteins is devoted to articles reporting the is followed by three that report some of the more interest- outcome of the fifth communitywide experiment to assess ing CAFASP results. methods of protein structure prediction (CASP5) and Large-scale benchmarking of prediction server perfor- related activities. Four previous CASP experiments in mance is reported in the following two articles: one for 1994, 1996, 1998, and 2000 were reported in previous Livebench,16 and one for EVA.17 In contrast to CASP and 1–4 5–13 special issues of Proteins as well as elsewhere. CAFASP, the benchmarking experiments run continu- 14,15 Independent discussions of CASP5 have also appeared. ously. Both Livebench and EVA operate by sending the The primary goals of CASP are to establish the capabili- sequences of just released PDB entries to automatic predic- ties and limitations of current methods of modeling protein tion servers and collating and analyzing the results over structure from sequence, to determine where progress is time. Livebench focuses primarily on fold recognition and being made, and to determine where the field is held back EVA primarily on secondary structure predictions. Live- by specific bottlenecks. With ϳ10 years of effort now bench and EVA are entirely independent of CASP, and we recorded, these latter factors—progress or the lack of are grateful to the organizers for their participation in the it—have assumed increasing importance. Methods are CASP5 meeting and in contributing to this issue of Pro- assessed on the basis of the analysis of a large number of teins. Benchmarking experiments complement CASP, par- blind predictions of protein structure. ticularly by clarifying issues of the statistical significance This article outlines the structure and conduct of the of the results. experiment and is followed by a description of the CASP5 Prediction of disorder in protein structures was included target proteins. There are sections of the special issue for for the first time in CASP5. An assumption behind the each of the main CASP prediction categories: Comparative prediction of protein structure is that, under specified Modeling, Fold Recognition, and New Fold methods. These environmental conditions, every protein molecule has es- sections begin with an article by the assessment team in that area and continue with contributions from the predic- tion groups the assessors considered to have done the most Grant sponsor: Lawrence Livermore Laboratory; Grant sponsor: interesting work. The number of predictor articles in each Department of Energy; Grant sponsor: National Library of Medicine; Grant number: LM07085; Grant sponsor: National Institutes of category varies—there are only three in comparative Health; Grant number: GM/DK61967; Grant sponsor: HP; Grant modeling, four in the fold recognition, and seven in the new sponsor: Amgen; Grant sponsor: GlaxoSmithKline; Grant sponsor: folds category. The small number of articles in compara- IBM. *Correspondence to: John Moult, Center for Advanced Research in tive modeling reflects the fact that there again appears to Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 9600 have been little progress in this area since the last CASP. Gudelsky Dr., Rockville, MD 208.50, E-mail: moult@umbi.umd.edu The assessors’ articles are probably the most important in Received: 21 June 2003; Accepted 24 June 2003 the whole issue and describe the state of the art as they found it in CASP5. © 2003 WILEY-LISS, INC. CASP5 335 sentially a single functional three-dimensional structure. analysis data generated with approved methods, and A number of experimental studies have established that may also add their own numerical methods. this does not always appear to be the case.18 Thus, the E. Protein Structure Prediction Center at Lawrence Liver- ability to predict disorder is of considerable importance. more Laboratory. The prediction center is responsible The section on this topic contains three articles: one for all data management aspects of the experiment, providing an evaluation of the predictions and two describ- including the distribution of target information, collec- ing some of the more interesting results. tion of predictions, generation of numerical evaluation Two additional articles complete the issue. The first was of predictions, collection of numerical evaluations from chosen by a vote on the FORCASP Web site (see below) as other workers, and maintenance of a Web site where all representing work done with particularly interesting meth- data are available. Details of these aspects of the ods. It is hoped that in future CASPs it will be possible to experiment are described in Ref. 21. include more methods-related material. The last article is F. The FORCASP Web site (www.FORCASP.org). As dis- an evaluation of progress since CASP4 using similar cussed below, FORCASP provides a forum where mem- methods to those for progress evaluation after CASPs 319 bers of the prediction community may discuss aspects and 4.20 of the CASP experiment. The CASP5 Experiment Collection of Targets The structure of the experiment was very similar to that X-ray crystallographers and NMR spectroscopists were of the earlier ones and consisted of three steps: solicited to provide information about structures that were either expected to be solved shortly or that were already 1. Information about “soon to be solved” structures was solved but had not yet been discussed in public. U.S. collected from the experimental community and passed structural genomics projects were also asked to contribute on to the prediction community. Target information prediction targets, and more than half of the targets came was made available through the CASP Web site and from that source. Target information was made available sent directly to registered CAFASP servers. to predictors through a Web interface. Details of 67 2. Prediction teams deposited models of the structures structures were obtained, and of these, 60 were solved in before the experimental results were public. For CASP, time to be included in the assessment. A number of these deposition was required by a specified deadline. For targets were divided into two or more domains for assess- CAFASP, servers were required to respond within ment purposes. The total again falls short of what we had 48 hours hoped for (ϳ100), but because of the participation of the 3. The models were compared with experiment by using structural genomics projects, it is about 50% larger than in numerical evaluation techniques and human assess- CASP4. ment, and a meeting was held to discuss the signifi- cance of the results. Categories of Prediction The quality of a structure model depends on how much Management and Organization information from already known structures can be used—at CASP has a multilevel structure, intended to ensure one extreme, models competitive with experiment can be substantial input from the prediction community: produced for proteins with sequences very similar to that of a known structure. At the other, models for proteins A. Organizers. The authors of this article, responsible for with no detectable sequence or structure relationship to all aspects of the organization of the experiment and one of known structure are still at best very approximate. meeting. In all the CASPs so far, targets have been divided into B. Consultancy groups. Three groups of ϳ10 veteran three broad categories, reflecting how extensively models CASP predictors each, one for each of the three primary could be based on knowledge of other structures. There is prediction categories. These groups, first
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Second Critical Assessment of Fully Automated Structure
    PROTEINS:Structure,Function,andGeneticsSuppl5:171–183(2001) DOI10.1002/prot.10036 CAFASP2:TheSecondCriticalAssessmentofFully AutomatedStructurePredictionMethods DanielFischer,1* ArneElofsson,2 LeszekRychlewski,3 FlorencioPazos,4† AlfonsoValencia,4† BurkhardRost,5 AngelR.Ortiz,6 andRolandL.Dunbrack,Jr.7 1Bioinformatics,DepartmentofComputerScience,BenGurionUniversity,Beer-Sheva,Israel 2StockholmmBioinformaticsCenter,StockholmUniversity,Stockholm,Sweden 3BioInfoBankInstitute,Poznan,Poland 4ProteinDesignGroup,CNB-CSIC,Cantoblanco,Madrid,Spain 5CUBIC,DepartmentofBiochemistryandMolecularBiophysics,ColumbiaUniversity,NewYork,NewYork 6DepartmentofPhysiologyandBiophysics,MountSinaiSchoolofMedicineoftheNewYorkUniversity,NewYork,NewYork 7InstituteforCancerResearch,FoxChaseCancerCenter,Philadelphia,Pennsylvania ABSTRACT TheresultsofthesecondCritical predictors.Weconcludethatasserverscontinueto AssessmentofFullyAutomatedStructurePredic- improve,theywillbecomeincreasinglyimportant tion(CAFASP2)arepresented.ThegoalsofCAFASP inanypredictionprocess,especiallywhendealing areto(i)assesstheperformanceoffullyautomatic withgenome-scalepredictiontasks.Weexpectthat webserversforstructureprediction,byusingthe inthenearfuture,theperformancedifferencebe- sameblindpredictiontargetsasthoseusedat tweenhumansandmachineswillcontinuetonar- CASP4,(ii)informthecommunityofusersaboutthe rowandthatfullyautomatedstructureprediction capabilitiesoftheservers,(iii)allowhumangroups willbecomeaneffectivecompanionandcomple- participatinginCASPtouseandanalyzetheresults menttoexperimentalstructuralgenomics.Proteins
    [Show full text]
  • EVA: Continuous Automatic Evaluation of Protein Structure Prediction Servers Volker A
    EVA: continuous automatic evaluation of protein structure prediction servers Volker A. Eyrich 1, Marc A. Martí-Renom 2, Dariusz Przybylski 3, Mallur S. Madhusudhan2, András Fiser 2, Florencio Pazos 4, Alfonso Valencia 4, Andrej Sali 2 & Burkhard Rost 3 1 Columbia Univ., Dept. of Chemistry, 3000 Broadway MC 3136, New York, NY 10027, USA 2 The Rockefeller Univ., Lab. of Molecular Biophysics, Pels Family Center for Biochemistry and Structural Biology, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021-6399, USA 3 CUBIC Columbia Univ, Dept. of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, 650 West 168th Street, New York, N.Y. 10032, USA 4 Protein Design Group, CNB-CSIC, Cantoblanco, Madrid 28049, Spain Corresponding author: B Rost, rost@columbia.edu, Tel +1-212-305-3773, Fax +1-212-305-7932 Running title: EVA: evaluation of prediction servers Document type: Application note Statistics: Abstract 153 words; Text 1129 words; 5 References Abstract Summary: Evaluation of protein structure prediction methods is difficult and time- consuming. Here, we describe EVA, a web server for assessing protein structure prediction methods, in an automated, continuous and large-scale fashion. Currently, EVA evaluates the performance of a variety of prediction methods available through the internet. Every week, the sequences of the latest experimentally determined protein structures are sent to prediction servers, results are collected, performance is evaluated, and a summary is published on the web. EVA has so far collected data for more than 3000 protein chains. These results may provide valuable insight to both developers and users of prediction methods. Availability: All EVA web pages are accessible at {http://cubic.bioc.columbia.edu/eva}.
    [Show full text]
  • Benchmarking the POEM@HOME Network for Protein Structure
    3rd International Workshop on Science Gateways for Life Sciences (IWSG 2011), 8-10 JUNE 2011 Benchmarking the POEM@HOME Network for Protein Structure Prediction Timo Strunk1, Priya Anand1, Martin Brieg2, Moritz Wolf1, Konstantin Klenin2, Irene Meliciani1, Frank Tristram1, Ivan Kondov2 and Wolfgang Wenzel1,* 1Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, PO Box 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany. 2Steinbuch Centre for Computing, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, PO Box 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany ABSTRACT forcefields (Fitzgerald, et al., 2007). Knowledge-based potentials, in contrast, perform very well in differentiating native from non- Motivation: Structure based methods for drug design offer great native protein structures (Wang, et al., 2004; Zhou, et al., 2007; potential for in-silico discovery of novel drugs but require accurate Zhou, et al., 2006) and have recently made inroads into the area of models of the target protein. Because many proteins, in particular protein folding. Physics-based models retain the appeal of high transmembrane proteins, are difficult to characterize experimentally, transferability, but the present lack of truly transferable potentials methods of protein structure prediction are required to close the gap calls for the development of novel forcefields for protein structure prediction and modeling (Schug, et al., 2006; Verma, et al., 2007; between sequence and structure information. Established methods Verma and Wenzel, 2009). for protein structure prediction work well only for targets of high We have earlier reported the rational development of transferable homology to known proteins, while biophysics based simulation free energy forcefields PFF01/02 (Schug, et al., 2005; Verma and methods are restricted to small systems and require enormous Wenzel, 2009) that correctly predict the native conformation of computational resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Methods for the Refinement of Protein Structure 3D Models
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Methods for the Refinement of Protein Structure 3D Models Recep Adiyaman and Liam James McGuffin * School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AS, UK; r.adiyaman@pgr.reading.ac.uk * Correspondence: l.j.mcguffin@reading.ac.uk; Tel.: +44-0-118-378-6332 Received: 2 April 2019; Accepted: 7 May 2019; Published: 1 May 2019 Abstract: The refinement of predicted 3D protein models is crucial in bringing them closer towards experimental accuracy for further computational studies. Refinement approaches can be divided into two main stages: The sampling and scoring stages. Sampling strategies, such as the popular Molecular Dynamics (MD)-based protocols, aim to generate improved 3D models. However, generating 3D models that are closer to the native structure than the initial model remains challenging, as structural deviations from the native basin can be encountered due to force-field inaccuracies. Therefore, different restraint strategies have been applied in order to avoid deviations away from the native structure. For example, the accurate prediction of local errors and/or contacts in the initial models can be used to guide restraints. MD-based protocols, using physics-based force fields and smart restraints, have made significant progress towards a more consistent refinement of 3D models. The scoring stage, including energy functions and Model Quality Assessment Programs (MQAPs) are also used to discriminate near-native conformations from non-native conformations. Nevertheless, there are often very small differences among generated 3D models in refinement pipelines, which makes model discrimination and selection problematic. For this reason, the identification of the most native-like conformations remains a major challenge.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Rosetta Protein Structure Prediction on Massively Parallel Systems
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Previously Published Works Title Advances in Rosetta protein structure prediction on massively parallel systems Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/87g6q6bw Journal IBM Journal of Research and Development, 52(1) ISSN 0018-8646 Authors Raman, S. Baker, D. Qian, B. et al. Publication Date 2008 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Advances in Rosetta protein S. Raman B. Qian structure prediction on D. Baker massively parallel systems R. C. Walker One of the key challenges in computational biology is prediction of three-dimensional protein structures from amino-acid sequences. For most proteins, the ‘‘native state’’ lies at the bottom of a free- energy landscape. Protein structure prediction involves varying the degrees of freedom of the protein in a constrained manner until it approaches its native state. In the Rosetta protein structure prediction protocols, a large number of independent folding trajectories are simulated, and several lowest-energy results are likely to be close to the native state. The availability of hundred-teraflop, and shortly, petaflop, computing resources is revolutionizing the approaches available for protein structure prediction. Here, we discuss issues involved in utilizing such machines efficiently with the Rosetta code, including an overview of recent results of the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction 7 (CASP7) in which the computationally demanding structure-refinement process was run on 16 racks of the IBM Blue Gene/Le system at the IBM T. J. Watson Research Center. We highlight recent advances in high-performance computing and discuss future development paths that make use of the next-generation petascale (.1012 floating-point operations per second) machines.
    [Show full text]
  • Gathering Them in to the Fold
    © 1996 Nature Publishing Group http://www.nature.com/nsmb • comment tion trials, preferring the shorter The first was held in 19947 (see Gathering sequences which are members of a http://iris4.carb.nist.gov/); the sec­ sequence family: shorter sequences ond will run throughout 19968 were felt to be easier to predict, and ( CASP2: second meeting for the them in to methods such as secondary struc­ critical assessment of methods of ture prediction are significantly protein structure prediction, Asilo­ the fold more accurate when based on a mar, December 1996; URL: multiple sequence alignment than http://iris4.carb.nist.gov/casp2/ or A definition of the state of the art in on a single sequence: one or two http://www.mrc-cpe.cam.ac.uk/casp the prediction of protein folding homologous sequences whisper 21). pattern from amino acid sequence about their three-dimensional What do the 'hard' results of the was the object of the course/work­ structure; a full multiple alignment past predication competition and shop "Frontiers of protein structure shouts out loud. the 'soft' results of the feelings of prediction" held at the Istituto di Program systems used included the workshop partiCipants say 1 Ricerche di Biologia Molecolare fold recognition methods by Sippl , about the possibilities of meaning­ (IRBM), outside Rome, on 8-17 Jones2, Barton (unpublished) and ful prediction? Certainly it is worth October 1995 (organized by T. Rost 3; secondary structure predic­ trying these methods on your target Hubbard & A. Tramontano; see tion by Rost and Sander\ analysis sequence-if you find nothing http://www.mrc-cpe.cam.ac.uk/irbm­ of correlated mutations by Goebel, quickly you can stop and return to course951).
    [Show full text]
  • Improving the Performance of Rosetta Using Multiple Sequence Alignment
    PROTEINS:Structure,Function,andGenetics43:1–11(2001) ImprovingthePerformanceofRosettaUsingMultiple SequenceAlignmentInformationandGlobalMeasures ofHydrophobicCoreFormation RichardBonneau,1 CharlieE.M.Strauss,2 andDavidBaker1* 1DepartmentofBiochemistry,Box357350,UniversityofWashington,Seattle,Washington 2BiosciencesDivision,LosAlamosNationalLaboratory,LosAlamos,NewMexico ABSTRACT Thisstudyexplorestheuseofmul- alwayssharethesamefold.8–11 Eachsequencealignment tiplesequencealignment(MSA)informationand canthereforebethoughtofasrepresentingasinglefold, globalmeasuresofhydrophobiccoreformationfor witheachpositionintheMSArepresentingthepreference improvingtheRosettaabinitioproteinstructure fordifferentaminoacidsandgapsatthecorresponding predictionmethod.Themosteffectiveuseofthe positioninthefold.BadretdinovandFinkelsteinand MSAinformationisachievedbycarryingoutinde- colleaguesusedthetheoreticalframeworkoftherandom pendentfoldingsimulationsforasubsetofthe energymodeltoarguethatthedecoydiscrimination homologoussequencesintheMSAandthenidentify- problemisnotcurrentlypossibleunlesstheinformationin ingthefreeenergyminimacommontoallfolded theMSAisusedtosmooththeenergylandscape.12,13 sequencesviasimultaneousclusteringoftheinde- Usingathree-dimensional(3D)cubiclatticemodelfora pendentfoldingruns.Globalmeasuresofhydropho- polypeptide,theseinvestigatorsdemonstratedthataverag- biccoreformation,usingellipsoidalratherthan ingascoringfunctioncontainingrandomerrorsover sphericalrepresentationsofthehydrophobiccore, severalhomologoussequencesallowedthecorrectfoldto
    [Show full text]
  • Precise Structural Contact Prediction Using Sparse Inverse Covariance Estimation on Large Multiple Sequence Alignments David T
    Vol. 28 no. 2 2012, pages 184–190 BIOINFORMATICS ORIGINAL PAPER doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr638 Sequence analysis Advance Access publication November 17, 2011 PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments David T. Jones1,∗, Daniel W. A. Buchan1, Domenico Cozzetto1 and Massimiliano Pontil2 1Department of Computer Science, Bioinformatics Group and 2Department of Computer Science, Centre for Computational Statistics and Machine Learning, University College London, Malet Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK Associate Editor: Mario Albrecht ABSTRACT separated with regards to the primary sequence but display close Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bioinformatics/article/28/2/184/198108 by guest on 30 September 2021 Motivation: The accurate prediction of residue–residue contacts, proximity within the 3D structure. Although different geometric critical for maintaining the native fold of a protein, remains an criteria for defining contacts have been given in the literature, open problem in the field of structural bioinformatics. Interest in typically, contacts are regarded as those pairs of residues where the this long-standing problem has increased recently with algorithmic C-β atoms approach within 8 Å of one another (C-α in the case of improvements and the rapid growth in the sizes of sequence families. Glycine) (Fischer et al., 2001; Graña et al., 2005a, b; Hamilton and Progress could have major impacts in both structure and function Huber, 2008). prediction to name but two benefits. Sequence-based contact It has long been observed that with sufficient correct information predictions are usually made by identifying correlated mutations about a protein’s residue–residue contacts, it is possible to elucidate within multiple sequence alignments (MSAs), most commonly the fold of the protein (Gobel et al., 1994; Olmea and Valencia, through the information-theoretic approach of calculating mutual 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • Rosetta @ Home and the Foldit Game
    Rosetta @ Home and the Foldit game Observations of a distributed computing project, for the Interconnect & Neuroscience course by prof.dr.ir. R.H.J.M. Otten By Frank Razenberg – f.r.m.razenberg@student.tue.nl – student id. 0636007 Contents 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Distributed Computing .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Concept ......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Applications ................................................................................................................................... 4 3 The BOINC Platform .............................................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Design ............................................................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Processing power .......................................................................................................................... 5 3.3 Interesting projects ....................................................................................................................... 6 3.3.1 SETI@home ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • EVA: Continuous Automatic Evaluation of Protein Structure Prediction Servers Volker A
    Vol. 17 no. 12 2001 BIOINFORMATICS APPLICATIONS NOTE Pages 1242–1243 EVA: continuous automatic evaluation of protein structure prediction servers Volker A. Eyrich 1, Marc A. Mart´ı-Renom 2, Dariusz Przybylski 3, Mallur S. Madhusudhan 2, Andras´ Fiser 2, Florencio Pazos 4, Alfonso Valencia 4, Andrej Sali 2 and Burkhard Rost 3,∗ 1Columbia University, Department of Chemistry, 3000 Broadway MC 3136, New York, NY 10027, USA, 2The Rockefeller University, Laboratory of Molecular Biophysics, Pels Family Center for Biochemistry and Structural Biology, 1230 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021-6399, USA, 3CUBIC Columbia University, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, 650 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA and 4Protein Design Group, CNB-CSIC, Cantoblanco, Madrid 28049, Spain Received on February 20, 2001; revised on May 28, 2001; accepted on July 4, 2001 ABSTRACT How well do experts predict protein structure? The Summary: Evaluation of protein structure prediction CASP experiments attempt to address the problem of over- methods is difficult and time-consuming. Here, we de- estimated performance (Zemla et al., 2001). Although scribe EVA, a web server for assessing protein structure CASP resolves the bias resulting from using known pro- prediction methods, in an automated, continuous and tein structures as targets, it has limitations. (1) The meth- large-scale fashion. Currently, EVA evaluates the perfor- ods are ranked by human assessors who have to evaluate mance of a variety of prediction methods available through thousands of predictions in 1–2 months (∼ 10 000 from the internet. Every week, the sequences of the latest 160 groups for CASP4; Zemla et al., 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Jakub Paś Application and Implementation of Probabilistic
    Jakub Paś Application and implementation of probabilistic profile-profile comparison methods for protein fold recognition (pol.: Wdrożenie i zastosowania probabilistycznych metod porównawczych profil-profil w rozpoznawaniu pofałdowania białek) Rozprawa doktorska ma formę spójnego tematycznie zbioru artykułów opublikowanych w czasopismach naukowych* Wydział Chemii, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu Promotor: dr hab. Marcin Hoffmann, prof. UAM Promotor pomocniczy: dr Krystian Eitner * Ustawa o stopniach naukowych i tytule naukowym oraz o stopniach i tytule w zakresie sztuki Dz.U.2003.65.595 - Ustawa z dnia 14 marca 2003 r. o stopniach naukowych i tytule naukowym oraz o stopniach i tytule w zakresie sztuki Art 13 1. Rozprawa doktorska, przygotowywana pod opieką promotora albo pod opieką promotora i promotora pomocniczego, o którym mowa w art. 20 ust. 7, powinna stanowić oryginalne rozwiązanie problemu naukowego lub oryginalne dokonanie artystyczne oraz wykazywać ogólną wiedzę teoretyczną kandydata w danej dyscyplinie naukowej lub artystycznej oraz umiejętność samodzielnego prowadzenia pracy naukowej lub artystycznej. 2. Rozprawa doktorska może mieć formę maszynopisu książki, książki wydanej lub spójnego tematycznie zbioru rozdziałów w książkach wydanych, spójnego tematycznie zbioru artykułów opublikowanych lub przyjętych do druku w czasopismach naukowych, określonych przez ministra właściwego do spraw nauki na podstawie przepisów dotyczących finansowania nauki, jeżeli odpowiada warunkom określonym w ust. 1. 3. Rozprawę doktorską może stanowić praca projektowa, konstrukcyjna, technologiczna lub artystyczna, jeżeli odpowiada warunkom określonym w ust. 1. 4. Rozprawę doktorską może także stanowić samodzielna i wyodrębniona część pracy zbiorowej, jeżeli wykazuje ona indywidualny wkład kandydata przy opracowywaniu koncepcji, wykonywaniu części eksperymentalnej, opracowaniu i interpretacji wyników tej pracy, odpowiadający warunkom określonym w ust. 1. 5.
    [Show full text]
  • April 11, 2003 1:34 WSPC/185-JBCB 00018 RAPTOR: OPTIMAL PROTEIN THREADING by LINEAR PROGRAMMING
    April 11, 2003 1:34 WSPC/185-JBCB 00018 Journal of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Vol. 1, No. 1 (2003) 95{117 c Imperial College Press RAPTOR: OPTIMAL PROTEIN THREADING BY LINEAR PROGRAMMING JINBO XU∗ and MING LIy Department of Computer Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont. N2L 3G1, Canada ∗j3xu@math.uwaterloo.ca ymli@math.uwaterloo.ca DONGSUP KIMz and YING XUx Protein Informatics Group, Life Science Division and Computer Sciences and Mathematics Division, Oak Ridge National Lab, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA zafg@ornl.gov xxyn@ornl.gov Received 22 January 2003 Revised 7 March 2003 Accepted 7 March 2003 This paper presents a novel linear programming approach to do protein 3-dimensional (3D) structure prediction via threading. Based on the contact map graph of the protein 3D structure template, the protein threading problem is formulated as a large scale inte- ger programming (IP) problem. The IP formulation is then relaxed to a linear program- ming (LP) problem, and then solved by the canonical branch-and-bound method. The final solution is globally optimal with respect to energy functions. In particular, our en- ergy function includes pairwise interaction preferences and allowing variable gaps which are two key factors in making the protein threading problem NP-hard. A surprising result is that, most of the time, the relaxed linear programs generate integral solutions directly. Our algorithm has been implemented as a software package RAPTOR{RApid Protein Threading by Operation Research technique. Large scale benchmark test for fold recogni- tion shows that RAPTOR significantly outperforms other programs at the fold similarity level.
    [Show full text]