DOCSLIB.ORG

Innovative Intersection Locations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Innovative Intersection Locations Existing Intersections, last updated: 11/5/2009 Look at any intersection from the list in your choice of web applications, such as MapQuest, GoogleMaps, BingMaps, etc. Note: When looking for intersections in other countries, notes under "other geog" may be helpful. Not all city boundaries are known; jurisdiction is approximate. Type City State/Country Cross Street 1 Cross Street 2 Other Geog Miscellaneous Continuous Flow Accokeek Maryland Indian Head Hwy / Route 210Berry Rd / Route 228 Prince George's County Left turns from Route 228 have crossover Continuous Flow Audubon Park New Jersey Nicholson Rd Black Horse Pike / Route 168Camden County Southbound 168 has crossover (northbound 168 has a jughandle for left turns) Continuous Flow Baton Rouge Louisiana Airline Hwy / US 61 Siegen Ln / Route 73 Continuous Flow Fenton Missouri Hwy 30 Summit Rd / Gravois Bluffs R St. Louis / Jefferson County Lcrossover on two legs (Hwy 30) Continuous Flow Juarez Mexico Manuel Gomez Morin Antonio Bermudez / De La inArroyos del Paraiso, Chihuahcrossover on lower volume cross street; this CFI featured in photographs widely circulated Continuous Flow Juarez Mexico Teofilio Borunda Antonio Bermudez Bosques del Sol, Chihuahua crossover on one leg only; traffic to shopping mall nearby Continuous Flow Mexico City Mexico Av. Rio Churubusco (aka InteAv. Plutarco Elias Calles (aka Iztacalco neighborhood Southbound leg of Rio Churubusco Continuous Flow Mexico City Mexico Av. Rio Mixcoac Insurgentes Sur Actipan neighborhood Southbound leg of Rio Mixcoac Continuous Flow Monterrey Mexico Chapultepec / Eloy Cavazox Paseo de Las Americas / Pue Puesta del Sol neighborhood Chapultepec and Eloy Cavazos legs have crossover Continuous Flow Saltillo Mexico Paseo de La Reforma / Blvd. Periferico Luis Echeverria Provivienda, Coahuila East/west legs have crossover, median u‐turn and hamburger in same corridor Continuous Flow Shirley New York William Floyd Pkwy (Norwood Dr) Brookhaven Airport crossover on one leg only; traffic to Brookhaven Airport and Dowling College campus Continuous Flow West Valley City Utah Bangerter Hwy / Route 154 3500 South / Route 171 Salt Lake County Diverging Diamond Champigny‐sur‐Marne France Boulevard de Stalingrad / D4 L'Autoroute de l'Est / A4 / E5Southeast of Paris and Vincennes, by Parc de Loisirs du Tremblay Diverging Diamond Kansas City Missouri E Front St Interstate 435 Under Construction 2009 Diverging Diamond Seclin France Route d'Avelin L'Autoroute du Nord / A1 / E Near Belgian border extra overpass in interchange just to handle high left turn volumes Diverging Diamond Vaucresson France Boulevard de Jardy L'Autoroute de Normandie / North of Versailles Hamburger Everett Massachusetts Route 16 / Revere Beach PkwMystic View Rd / Santilli Hwy Hamburger Fairfax Virginia US 50 / US 29 / Arlington Blv Old Lee Hwy / Lee Hwy Hamburger Cherry Hill New Jersey Route 38 / Kaighns Ave Church Rd Coles Ave Cherry Hill Mall Hamburger Marlton New Jersey Route 73 Route 70 / Marlton Pike Hamburger Saltillo Mexico Blvd Los Fundadores Blvd Morelos Las Coquetas median u‐turn and continuous flow in same corridor Hamburger Tijuana Mexico Parque Mexico Sur / Olas Alt Olas Altas y o Paseo EnsenadPlayas de Tijuana, Jardines d 3 hamburgers together Hamburger Tijuana Mexico Cuauhtemoc Paseo Centenario Tijuana Near Plaza Rio Tijuana shoppcomplicated situation Hybrid Collingswood New Jersey Crescent Blvd / US 130 / US 3Haddon Ave / Ferry Ave split intersection uses overpass with quadrants/jughandles Hybrid Merchantville New Jersey N Crescent Blvd / US 130 Maple Ave N 34th St split intersection with single loop Hybrid Parry New Jersey US 130 / Burlington Pike Branch Pike Church Rd / Cinnaminson Av jughandles/quadrants seem to form mini‐hamburger intersection Hybrid Swindon England UK The Magic Roundabout Queens Dr 2‐directional / multi roundabout Hybrid Swindon England UK Great Western Way Kemble Dr 2‐directional roundabout / 4 rndbts Interchange Roundabout Aachen Germany Europaplatz Autobahn 544 freeway terminus near downtown Aachen Interchange Roundabout Avon Colorado I‐70 Avon Rd / Nottingham Rd double teardrop Interchange Roundabout Braintree Massachusetts Pilgrim's Hwy / Route 3 Union St single roundabout interchange Interchange Roundabout Carson City Nevada US 395 Arrowhead Dr double roundabout intersections Interchange Roundabout Gardner Massachusetts Mohawk Trail / Route 2 Timpany Blvd / Route 68 Main St ≈ Timpany Blvd two single roundabout interchanges in Gardner Interchange Roundabout St. George Utah I‐15 Brigham Rd / Pioneer Rd Bloomington roundabout on west side of I‐15, teardrop on east Jughandle Las Vegas Nevada Iron Horse Dr S Grand Central Pkwy 2‐directional jughandle accomodates left turns to/from I‐15 ramp Jughandle Pontiac Michigan US 24 / N Telegraph Rd Elizabeth Lake Rd Classic single jughandle, with right turns diverted around it Jughandle Toms River New Jersey Hooper Ave Bay Ave Ocean Country Mall also a mini‐cloverleaf, complete with 4 jughandles and 4 right turn lanes Jughandle Toms River New Jersey Route 37 / Locust St W Route 166 / Main St / Lakewood Rd classic double jughandle. right turn lane on southeast quadrant only Median U‐Turn Birmingham Michigan Route 1 / Woodward Ave W 14 Mile Rd See also downtown Birmingham hybrid Median U‐Turn Bloomfield Hills Michigan US 24 / Telegraph Rd Saxon Dr See also Telegraph/Maple quadrant intersection Median U‐Turn Juarez Mexico Antonio Bermudez Ejercito Nacional Jazmines u‐turn on 3 legs Median U‐Turn Juarez Mexico Av de Las Torres Blvd Santiago Blancas Torres del Pri both streets have median u‐turn treatment Median U‐Turn Saltillo Mexico Paseo de La Reforma / Blvd. Francisco Coss / 26 de Febre Miraflores continuous flow intersection nearby Median U‐Turn Santiago Chile Av Gladys Marin / Av PajaritoAv Las Torres fixed‐route transit in intersection (e/w), left turns on MUT in cross street (n/s) Oval/Higher Speed Roundabout Puebla Mexico Blvd. Hnos. Serdan Av. San Felip / Calle 37 NorteHeroica Puebla de Zaragoza several others on Blvd Hnos Serdan Oval/Higher Speed Roundabout South Jordan Utah W 11400 SS 3800 W east of Bangerter Hwy Parallel Flow Intersection Oaklyn New Jersey Crescent Blvd / US 130 Black Horse Pike / Route 168Camden County PFI ‐ like treatment on US 130 traffic turning left. Route 168 has no left turns at intersection. Quadrant Roadway Birmingham Michigan Woodward Ave / Route 1E Maple Rd quadrants are provided for movement in downtown ‐ Park St, Peobody St, Forest Ave ‐ Woodward has median u‐turns Quadrant Roadway Bloomfield Hills Michigan US 24 / Telegraph Rd W Maple Rd true QRI, can accommodate 3 of the left movements; US 24 also a MUT system Roundabout Avon Colorado Avon Rd several avon rd has three roundabouts instead of traffic signals, in addition to the teardrop rdbts at I‐70 Roundabout Brooklawn New Jersey US 130 / Crescent Blvd S Hannevig Ave 4 different types of roundabouts in one small area Roundabout Clearwater Beach Florida Clearwater Memorial CausewCoronado Dr Roundabout Coeur d'Alene Idaho N 4th St E Margaret Ave Roundabout Heidelberg Germany Roemerkreis Bahnhofstrasse streetcar/light rail intersection in center Roundabout Lacey Washington Pacific Ave SE / Lacey Blvd SEGolf Club Rd SE Pacific splits into couplet with Lacey Blvd Roundabout Las Vegas Nevada Essex Circle Evergreen Pl community park in center Roundabout Las Vegas Nevada Summerlin Village Center Town Center Drive urban design with roundabout system Roundabout Nampa Idaho Amity Ave Happy Valley Rd Roundabout Orem Utah W 1200 SS 400 W UVU Campus small roundabout, 5 point; another roundabout at university main entrance Roundabout Paris France Place de l'Etoile Av. des Champs‐Elysees Arc de Triomphe Mulit‐Lane Roundabout with secondary outer circular street Roundabout Philadelphia Pennsylvania Logan Square Benjamin Franklin Pkwy 9th Street multi‐lane roundabout ‐ preference to traffic on Benjamin Franklin Pkwy Roundabout Portland Oregon Ladd Circle SE Elliott Ave community park in center Roundabout Provo Utah E Center St N 700 E St redesign in older neighborhood Roundabout Towson Maryland Route 45 / York Rd E Joppa Rd Downtown Towson well‐known roundabout in downtown Towson Roundabout Washington District of Columbia Washington Cir NW Pennsylvania Ave NW US 29 major traffic on US 29 / K St NW now passes under Washington Square; Dupont Circle and Thomas Circle have also bee Single Loop (quadrant with overpass) Akron Ohio Exchange St Wolf Ledges Pkwy Single Loop (quadrant with overpass) Mississaugua Ontario Hay 5 / Dundas St E Cawthra Rd Hwy 5 parallel to RR Single Loop (quadrant with overpass) Owings Mills Maryland Owings Mills Blvd Route 140 / Reisterstown Rd RR near intersection Single Loop (quadrant with overpass) Vaughan Ontario Hwy 7 Dufferin St Langstaff Rd Hwy 7 parallel to Hwy 407 Single Loop (quadrant with overpass) Vaughan Ontario Hwy 7 Bathurst St Hwy 7 parallel to Hwy 407 Single Loop (quadrant with overpass) Wallingford Connecticut Barnes Rd / Route 68 N Colony Rd / US 5US 5 parallel to RR Split Intersection Burlington New Jersey Burlington Pike / US 130 High St also has town center features Split Intersection Golden Triangle New Jersey S Crescent Blvd / US 130 Marlton Pike / Whitman Ave Split Intersection Pennsauken New Jersey US 130 / Westfield/Camden Industrial Hwy Split Intersection Waco Texas New Dallas Hwy / US 77 Industrial Blvd E / Texas Loop 340 Superstreet (with median u‐turn) Leland North Carolina US 17 / Ocean Hwy E Grandiflora Dr / W Gate Dr Superstreet
Recommended publications
  • Atlantic City Expressway: 1964 – 2014 I

    Atlantic City Expressway: 1964 – 2014 I

    Celebrating 50 Years of Transportation Investment in Southern New Jersey THE REGIONAL ECONOMI C IMP ACT OF THE ATLANTIC CITY EXPRESSW AY : 1964 –2014 The Regional economic Impact of the atlantic City expressway: 1964 – 2014 i Table of ConTenTs Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................................................iii Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................iii Framework ..................................................................................................................................................iv Highlights ..................................................................................................................................................v Conclusion ..................................................................................................................................................x Section 1: Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................1 Section 2: The Economic Development Impact of Transportation Projects: A Framework ......................................................................................................................................2 Section 3: PHASE I: FROM DREAM TO REALITY, 1932 – 1963 ..................................................................4 ACEx
  • Alternative Intersections Comparative Analysis

    Alternative Intersections Comparative Analysis

    Alternative Intersections Comparative Analysis Morgan State University The Pennsylvania State University University of Maryland University of Virginia Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University West Virginia University The Pennsylvania State University The Thomas D. Larson Pennsylvania Transportation Institute Transportation Research Building University Park, PA 16802-4710 Phone: 814-865-1891 Fax: 814-863-3707 www.mautc.psu.edu OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS OF ALTERNATIVE INTERSECTIONS By: John Sangster and Hesham Rakha Mid-Atlantic University Transportation Center Final Report Department of Civil and Environment Engineering Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University July 23, 2015 1 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. VT-2012-03 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Operational Analysis of Alternative Intersections July 21, 2015 6. Performing Organization Code Virginia Tech 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. John Sangster and Hesham Rakha 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Virginia Tech Transportation Institute 3500 Transportation Research Plaza 11. Contract or Grant No. Blacksburg, VA 24061 DTRT12-G-UTC03 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report US Department of Transportation Final Report Research & Innovative Technology Admin UTC Program, RDT-30 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 1200 New Jersey Ave., SE Washington, DC 20590 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract Alternative intersections and interchanges, such as the diverging diamond interchange (DDI), the restricted crossing u-turn (RCUT), and the displaced left-turn intersection (DLT), have the potential to both improve safety and reduce delay. However, partially due to lingering questions about analysis methods and service measures for these designs, their rate of implementation remains low.
  • Intersections - Final Report

    Intersections - Final Report

    Operational Applications of Signalized Offset T- Intersections - Final Report Institute for Transportation Research and Education (ITRE) North Carolina State University Christopher M. Cunningham, P.E., P.I. Shannon Warchol, P.E., Co-P.I. Juwoon Baek Guangchuan Yang, Ph.D. NCDOT Project 2019-31 July 2020 NCDOT 2019-31 Project Report This page is intentionally blank. II North Carolina Department of Transportation Research Project No. 2019-31 Operational Applications of Signalized Offset T-Intersections Christopher M. Cunningham Shannon E. Warchol Juwoon Baek Guangchuan Yang July 2020 NCDOT 2019-31 Project Report 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA/NC/2019-31 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Operational Applications of Signalized Offset T-Intersections July 22, 2020 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Chris Cunningham, MSCE, P.E., Shannon Warchol, MSCE, P.E., Juwoon Baek, Guangchuan Yang, Ph.D. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) Institute for Transportation Research and Education North Carolina State University 11. Contract or Grant No. Centennial Campus Box 8601 Raleigh, NC 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered North Carolina Department of Transportation Final Report Research and Analysis Group August 2017 – July 2020 104 Fayetteville Street Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 2019-31 Supplementary Notes: 16. Abstract NCDOT maintains a significant number of T intersections with developable land occupying the vacant fourth leg. When a need for a fourth leg is established, NCDOT must determine the optimal location of the leg.
  • Design Manual M 22-01.15 July 2018

    Design Manual M 22-01.15 July 2018

    Publications Transmittal Transmittal Number Date PT 18-056 July 2018 Publication Distribution To: Design Manual Holders Publication Title Publication Number Design Manual – July 2018 M 22-01.15 Originating Organization WSDOT Development Division, Design Office – Design Policy, Standards, and Safety Research Section Remarks and Instructions What’s changed in the Design Manual for July 2018? See the summary of revisions beginning on Page 3. How do you stay connected to current design policy? It’s the designer’s responsibility to apply current design policy when developing transportation projects at WSDOT. The best way to know what’s current is to reference the manual online. Access the current electronic WSDOT Design Manual, the latest revision package, and individual chapters at: www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/m22-01.htm We’re ready to help. If you have comments or questions about the Design Manual, please don’t hesitate to contact us. Area of Practice Your Contacts Geometric Design, Roadside Safety Jeff Petterson 360-705-7246 [email protected] and Traffic Barriers Chris Schroedel 360-705-7299 [email protected] General Guidance and Support John Donahue 360-705-7952 [email protected] To get the latest information on individual WSDOT publications: Sign up for email updates at: www.wsdot.wa.gov/publications/manuals/ HQ Design Office Signature Phone Number /s/ Jeff Carpenter 360-705-7821 Page 1 of 6 Remove/Insert instructions for those who maintain a printed manual NOTE: Also replace the Title Page CHAPTER/SECTION REMOVE
  • 2007-32 Benefit-Cost Analysis for Intersection Decision Support

    2007-32 Benefit-Cost Analysis for Intersection Decision Support

    2007-32 Benefit-Cost Analysis for Intersection Decision Support Report #5 in the Series: Developing Intersection Decision Support Solutions e ativ Solutions! nov ..In earch...Knowledge. es Take the steps... R Transportation Research Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. MN/RC-2007-32 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Benefit-Cost Analysis for Intersection Decision Support October 2007 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Michael Corbett, David Levinson, Xi Zou 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. University of Minnesota Department of Civil Engineering 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. 500 Pillsbury Drive S.E. (c) 81655 (wo) 33 Minneapolis, MN 55455 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Minnesota Department of Transportation Final Report 395 John Ireland Boulevard Mail Stop 330 14. Sponsoring Agency Code St. Paul, Minnesota 55155 15. Supplementary Notes http://www.lrrb.org/PDF/200732.pdf Report #5 in the Series: Developing Intersection Decision Support Solutions 16. Abstract (Limit: 200 words) The Intersection Decision Support (IDS) system is designed to assist drivers on stop-controlled low-volume rural roads choosing gaps when confronted with busy multiple lane divided-highways, without affecting traffic on the high-volume road. The hope is, that by providing better gap guidance, fewer crashes (and fatalities) will occur. This research develops a framework for analyzing such a new, and presently under-specified technology, and illustrates that framework by comparing that with more conventional engineering approaches, as well as a “do- nothing” base case.
  • CAMDEN COUNTY HIGHWAY CIRCULATION ~E: PLAN ,$!;

    CAMDEN COUNTY HIGHWAY CIRCULATION ~E: PLAN ,$!;

    CAMDEN COUNTY HIGHWAY CIRCULATION ~e: PLAN ,$!;, .. '\, ,, \ ,, ,, I , I i, • , I I I , , , Wf\TEAFOAD J , J~ , • , I , IJ , I , • , &a , , Delaware Valley ,) , Regional Planning , , \ Commission ~~~ \ Bi>~""<WIIZI'Ir:[I~~IIIIIJMI'I',",I!IiSIIIIJtIIO: December, 1991 CAMDEN COUNTY IDGHWAY CIRCULATION PLAN FINAL DOCUMENT DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 1997 CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS Jeffrey L. Nash, Freeholder Director Annette Castiglione-Degan, Freeholder Deputy Director Scott M. Goldberg, Freeholder, Department of Public Works (Divisions of Engineering and Planning) Riletta Cream Edward T. McDonnell Bernard A. Platt Frank Spencer CAMDEN COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Jeffrey L. Nash, Freeholder Director Scott M. Goldberg, Freeholder Frank Spencer, Freeholder Barry Malesich, Board Chairperson Carole Miller, Board Vice-Chairperson Robert E. Kelly, P.E., County Engineer Thomas Quackenbush William J. Controvich William J. Snyder Margaret A. Young Joseph Forte George Jones Michael Brennan, Esquire, Board Solicitor CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS: Dominic J. Vesper, Jr., Director George C. Fallon, Supervisor of Roads DIVISION OF ENGINEERING: Robert E. Kelly, P.E., County Engineer DIVISION OF PLANNING: J. Douglas Griffith, P.P., AICP, Planning Director Thomas B. Chamberlin, Supervising Planner Land Development and Review Gail Elbert, Supervising Planner Ronald Jernegan, Data Processing Technician Louise M. Sawchuk, Principal Clerk Typist DELAWARE V ALLEY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Publication Abstract
  • Traditional Intersections Vs. Town Center Intersections Traditional

    Traditional Intersections Vs. Town Center Intersections Traditional

    Traditional Intersections vs. Town Center Intersections Similar to Split Intersection ‐ roads are split into 1‐way streets and space in center developed or preserved Traditional Intersection Traditional iiintersection signal cycle has 4 phases – 2 for left turns 2 for through movements Traditional Intersection 4 Phase Signal Cycle Times* 10% 6% 22% 62% lefts straight through *average intersection 75% of the traffic (through movement) gets only about 60% of the cycle time Too much time spent on left turns and yellow signals (transition between movements) Innovative Intersection Innovative intersection signal cycles have only 2 (or 3) phases – left turns are moved or redirected Innovative Intersections create more green time 4 Phase Signal ItiInnovative 2 Phase Cycle Times Signal Cycle Times 6% 4% 10% 6% 22% 62% 90% lefts straight straight through through 75% ‐ 80% of traffic 100% of traffic gets 90% of time – gets only about 60% of time no waiting for left turns Town Center Intersection A town center split intersection, intersection (tci) but both streets is similar to the are separated FUTURE USE open or developed “Town Center” available FUTURE USE for public open or developed into 1‐way ora private 4 simple uses. streets, creating d intersections Assist Town Center Intersection A town center split intersection, intersection (tci) but both streets is similar to the are separated FUTURE USE open or developed “Town Center” available FUTURE USE for public open or developed into 1‐way ora private 4 simple uses. streets, creating d intersections Assist Town Center Intersection A town center split intersection, intersection (tci) but both streets is similar to the are separated FUTURE USE open or developed “Town Center” available FUTURE USE for public open or developed into 1‐way ora private 4 simple uses.
  • Open House Presentation Boards

    Open House Presentation Boards

    WELCOME Today’s Agenda Study Team Study Sponsors: Work Completed to Date New Jersey Department of Transportation What was Considered Study Partners: Federal Transit New Jersey Transit Administration What are the Findings Federal Highway Delaware Valley Regional Administration Planning Commission What is Recommended South Jersey South Jersey Transportation Transportation Authority Planning Organization Consultants: STV Incorporated Transit Investment Vision for Southern New Jersey Southern New Jersey to Philadelphia Mass Transit Expansion Alternatives AnalysisSTV Incorporated Project Development Process ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS MAJOR TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT STUDY Define Needs and Goals Alternatives Analysis Identify Transit Preliminary Alternatives DEIS or EA Engineering Develop Alternative Final Design Attributes Evaluate and Compare Construction Alternatives 5 - 7 Years Minimum Select Preferred Start-Up / Operations Public Outreach and Agency Coordination Public Outreach and Agency Alternative STV Incorporated Public Outreach & Agency Coordination Round 2 Public Open Houses Round 2 Deptford - November 27, 2007 Camden - June 10, 2009 Vineland - November 28, 2007 Woodbury - June 11, 2009 Glassboro - November 29, 2007 Blackwood - June 17, 2009 Gloucester City - December 4, 2007 Glassboro - June 18, 2009 Over 400 Round 1 Round 1 Attendees Monroe - December 6, 2007 Elected Official Briefings Targeted Outreach & Agency Coordination STV Incorporated Project Goals ¾Improve Transit Choices in the Southern New Jersey Study Area ¾Reduce Congestion
  • Development of Performance Matrices for Evaluating Innovative Intersections and Interchanges

    Development of Performance Matrices for Evaluating Innovative Intersections and Interchanges

    Report No. UT-15.13 DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE MATRICES FOR EVALUATING INNOVATIVE INTERSECTIONS AND INTERCHANGES Prepared For: Utah Department of Transportation Research Division Submitted By: University of Utah Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Authored by: Milan Zlatkovic, Ph.D. September 2015 DISCLAIMER: ―The authors alone are responsible for the preparation and accuracy of the information, data, analysis, discussions, recommendations, and conclusions presented herein. The contents do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions, endorsements, or policies of the Utah Department of Transportation and the US Department of Transportation. The Utah Department of Transportation makes no representation or warranty of any kind, and assumes no liability therefore.‖ i 1. Report No. UT-15.13 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date September 2015 DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE 6. Performing Organization Code MATRICES FOR EVALUATING INNOVATIVE INTERSECTIONS AND INTERCHANGES 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report No. Milan Zlatkovic 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. 8RD1630H University of Utah 110 Central Campus Dr. Room 2000 11. Contract No. Salt Lake City, UT 84112 14-8754 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Utah Department of Transportation Final Report (Mar 2014 – September 2015) Research Division 4501 South 2700 West 14. Sponsoring Agency Code Salt Lake City, Utah 84114-8410 UT13.316 15. Supplementary Notes Prepared in cooperation with the Utah Department of Transportation. 16. Abstract Innovative intersections and interchanges, primarily Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) and Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI), have seen an increase in numbers in the State of Utah over the past several years, making Utah a leader in the country in implementation of these designs.
  • VDOT Signal Justification Report (SJR)

    VDOT Signal Justification Report (SJR)

    VDOT Signal Justification Report Template - Version 2.0 - December 2019 08/24/2020 VDOT Signal Justification Report (SJR) Northern District Note: Text in small gray font is sample input or guidance only & should be removed from the final Kayla Ord document before conversion to PDF. The full SJR, including appendices (A, B, and C as noted at the back 08/24/2020 of this template), should be submitted electronically as a PDF file to avoid unnecessary printing and allow for efficient review by VDOT. Gorove Slade Refer to the latest edition of IIM-TE-387 for additional information about the application of the SJR process Chantilly, VA in various scenarios. Traffic Engineer Date: August 24, 2020 I. Study Intersection Major Street Route # and Name: Leesburg Pike (Route 7) Direction: East/West Minor Street Route # and Name: Chestnut Street (Route 1750) & Commons Drive (NIS) Direction: Choose an item. County or Locality: City of Falls Church Is the Intersection on the Arterial Preservation Network (APN)?: Yes Sketch/Diagram/Aerial of the Intersection Geometry: Page 1 of 5 VDOT Signal Justification Report Template - Version 2.0 - December 2019 Describe the origin and nature of the request. If this SJR is based on a recommendation from another study (e.g. Traffic Impact Analysis or Safety Study), then note the name/date of the study and attach the study to this SJR. Submit the relevant study (e.g. traffic impact analysis, safety study, etc.) as Appendix C to the SJR if the study documents are available. If the relevant document is not available, please note the name and date of the study.
  • Evaluation of Innovative Alternative Intersection Designs in the Development of Safety Performance Functions and Crash Modification Factors

    Evaluation of Innovative Alternative Intersection Designs in the Development of Safety Performance Functions and Crash Modification Factors

    Final Report Contract BDV24-977-27 Evaluation of Innovative Alternative Intersection Designs in the Development of Safety Performance Functions and Crash Modification Factors Mohamed A. Abdel-Aty, Ph.D., P.E. Jaeyoung Lee, Ph.D. Jinghui Yuan, Ph.D. Lishengsa Yue, Ph.D. Ma’en Al-Omari, Ph.D. Student Ahmed Abdelrahman, Ph.D. Student University of Central Florida Department of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering Orlando, FL 32816-2450 May 2020 DISCLAIMER “The opinions, findings, and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the State of Florida Department of Transportation.” ii UNITS CONVERSION APPROXIMATE CONVERSIONS TO SI UNITS SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL LENGTH in inches 25.4 millimeters mm ft feet 0.305 meters m yd yards 0.914 meters m mi miles 1.61 kilometers km SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL AREA in2 square inches 645.2 square millimeters mm2 ft2 square feet 0.093 square meters m2 yd2 square yard 0.836 square meters m2 ac acres 0.405 hectares ha mi2 square miles 2.59 square kilometers km2 WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL SYMBOL VOLUME fl oz fluid ounces 29.57 milliliters mL gal gallons 3.785 liters L ft3 cubic feet 0.028 cubic meters m3 yd3 cubic yards 0.765 cubic meters m3 NOTE: volumes greater than 1000 L shall be shown in m3 SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW MULTIPLY BY TO FIND SYMBOL MASS oz ounces 28.35 grams g lb pounds 0.454 kilograms kg iii T short tons (2000 lb) 0.907 megagrams (or Mg (or "t") "metric ton") SYMBOL WHEN YOU KNOW
  • Atlantic County, New Jersey

    Atlantic County, New Jersey

    Township of Egg Harbor Atlantic County, New Jersey Master Plan Reexamination Report Prepared For: Egg Harbor Township Planning Board 3515 Bargaintown Road Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey 08234 June 2017 Prepared By: Rutala Associates, LLC 717 River Drive Linwood, NJ 08221 6684 Washington Avenue Egg Harbor Township, NJ 08234 Master Plan Reexamination Report June 2017 Prepared For: Egg Harbor Township Planning Board 3515 Bargaintown Road Egg Harbor Township, New Jersey 08234 Prepared By: Polistina & Associates, LLC 6684 Washington Avenue Egg Harbor Township, NJ 08234 PA Job No. 2000.29 Rutala Associates, LLC 717 River Drive Linwood, NJ 08221 _______________________________________ Vincent J. Polistina, PE, PP New Jersey Professional Planner License No. 5595 _______________________________________ James M. Rutala, PP New Jersey Professional Planner License No. 2704 Egg Harbor Township Master Plan Reexamination 2017 1 Polistina & Associates / Rutala Associates Members of the Planning Board - 2017 Mr. James J. McCullough, Jr, Mayor........................................................... Class I Member Mr. Peter J. Miller, Township Administrator. ............................................ Class II Member Ms. Laura Pfrommer, Committeewoman. ................................................ Class III Member Mr. James Garth, Sr., Chairman ............................................................... Class IV Member Mr. Manuel “Manny” Aponte, Vice Chairman ........................................ Class IV Member Mr. Paul Rosenberg, 2nd Vice