Two-Dimensional Ranking of Wikipedia Articles
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Players Biel International Chess Festival
2009 Players Biel International Chess Festival Players Boris Gelfand Israel, 41 yo Elo: 2755 World ranking: 9 Date and place of birth: 24.6.1968, in Minsk (Belarus) Lives in: Rishon-le-Zion (Israel) Israel ranking: 1 Best world ranking: 3 (January 1991) In Biel GMT: winner in 1993 (Interzonal) and 2005. Other results: 3rd (1995, 1997, 2001), 4th (2000) Two Decades at the Top of Chess This is not a comeback, since Boris Gelfand never left the chess elite in the last twenty years. However, at the age of 41, the Israeli player has reached a new peak and is experiencing a a third wind. He is back in the world Top-10, officially as number 9 (in fact, a virtual number 5, if one takes into account his latest results that have not yet been recorded). He had not been ranked so high since 2006. Age does not seem to matter for this player who is unanimously appreciated in the field, both for his technical prowess and his personality. In Biel, he will not only be the senior player of the Grandmaster tournament, but also the top ranked and the Festival’s most loyal participant. Since his first appearance in 1993, he has come seven times to Biel; it is precisely at this Festival that he earned one of his greatest victories: in 1993, he finished first in the Interzonal Tournament (which, by then, was the only qualifying competition for the world championship), out of 73 participating grandmasters (including Anand and Kramnik). His victory in Biel against Anand is mentioned in his book, My Most Memorable Games. -
Bulletin Round 6 -08.08.14
Bulletin Round 6 -08.08.14 That Carlsen black magic Blitz and “Media chess attention playing is a tool to seals get people to chess” Photos: Daniel Skog, COT 2014 (Carlsen and Seals) / David Martinez, chess24 (Gelfand) Chess Olympiad Tromsø 2014 – Bulletin Round 6– 08.08.14 Fabiano Caruana and Magnus Carlsen before the start of round 6 Photo: David Llada / COT2014 That Carlsen black magic Norway 1 entertained the home fans with a clean 3-1 over Italy, and with Magnus Carlsen performing some of his patented minimalist magic to defeat a major rival. GM Kjetil Lie put the Norwegians ahead with the kind of robust aggression typical of his best form on board four, and the teams traded wins on boards two and three. All eyes were fixed on the Caruana-Carlsen clash, where Magnus presumably pulled off an opening surprise by adopting the offbeat variation that he himself had faced as White against Nikola Djukic of Montenegro in round three. By GM Jonathan Tisdall Caruana appeared to gain a small but comfortable Caruana is number 3 in the world and someone advantage in a queenless middlegame, but as I've lost against a few times, so it feels incredibly Carlsen has shown so many times before, the good to beat him. quieter the position, the deadlier he is. In typically hypnotic fashion, the position steadily swung On top board Azerbaijan continues to set the Carlsen's way, and suddenly all of White's pawns pace, clinching another match victory thanks to were falling like overripe fruit. Carlsen's pleasure two wins with the white pieces, Mamedyarov with today's work was obvious, as he stopped to beating Jobava in a bare-knuckle brawl, and with high-five colleague Jon Ludvig Hammer on his GM Rauf Mamedov nailing GM Gaioz Nigalidze way into the NRK TV studio. -
ESI NEWS Volume 5, Issue 2, Autumn 2010
The Erwin Schrödinger International Boltzmanngasse 9/2 Institute for Mathematical Physics A-1090 Vienna, Austria ESI NEWS Volume 5, Issue 2, Autumn 2010 Editorial nized by A. Rebhan (Vienna), S. Husa Contents (Univ. Illes Balears, Spain) and K. Land- Klaus Schmidt steiner (IFT Madrid, Spain) and ran for Editorial1 three months from August – October 2010. This programme studied quantum chromo- Stefan Hollands: Correlators in de- dynamics (QCD), the theory of the strong Sitter spacetime and the ‘heat As many readers of nuclear interactions and focussed on the death’ of the Universe3 this newsletter will theory behind some of the expected – and know already, the year some unexpected – properties of the state Letters in Support of the ESI 10 2010 was ‘interesting’ of matter in heavy-ion collisions at the News from the ESI Community 19 for the ESI. Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) at Scientifically, the the Brookhaven National Laboratory in the Current and Future Activities of second half of this USA, for example. Two workshops were the ESI 22 year continued very well. The programme part of this programme, one on AdS holog- raphy and the quark-gluon plasma, and one Erwin Schrödinger Lectures 24 Matter and radiation, organized by V.Bach (Mainz), J. Fröhlich (ETH Zürich) und J. on Hot matter. More than 100 participants Senior Research Fellows’ Lecture Yngvason (Vienna) ended on July 31. Its visited the ESI for various periods of time Courses 2011 24 subject matter was the quantum mechanical during this activity. description of non-relativistic matter, with The last thematic programme in 2010 Lectures on physical and math- about 50 participating scientists. -
Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman
Wolfgang Pauli Niels Bohr Paul Dirac Max Planck Richard Feynman Louis de Broglie Norman Ramsey Willis Lamb Otto Stern Werner Heisenberg Walther Gerlach Ernest Rutherford Satyendranath Bose Max Born Erwin Schrödinger Eugene Wigner Arnold Sommerfeld Julian Schwinger David Bohm Enrico Fermi Albert Einstein Where discovery meets practice Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology IQ ST in Baden-Württemberg . Introduction “But I do not wish to be forced into abandoning strict These two quotes by Albert Einstein not only express his well more securely, develop new types of computer or construct highly causality without having defended it quite differently known aversion to quantum theory, they also come from two quite accurate measuring equipment. than I have so far. The idea that an electron exposed to a different periods of his life. The first is from a letter dated 19 April Thus quantum theory extends beyond the field of physics into other 1924 to Max Born regarding the latter’s statistical interpretation of areas, e.g. mathematics, engineering, chemistry, and even biology. beam freely chooses the moment and direction in which quantum mechanics. The second is from Einstein’s last lecture as Let us look at a few examples which illustrate this. The field of crypt it wants to move is unbearable to me. If that is the case, part of a series of classes by the American physicist John Archibald ography uses number theory, which constitutes a subdiscipline of then I would rather be a cobbler or a casino employee Wheeler in 1954 at Princeton. pure mathematics. Producing a quantum computer with new types than a physicist.” The realization that, in the quantum world, objects only exist when of gates on the basis of the superposition principle from quantum they are measured – and this is what is behind the moon/mouse mechanics requires the involvement of engineering. -
The Power of Light
David N Payne Dedicated to: Guglielmo Marconi and Charles Kao Director ORC University of Southampton 1909 2009 Nobel Laureates in Physics Wireless and optical fibres The power of light GPS systems, synchronous data networks, cell phone telephony, time stamping financial trades Large scale interferometers for telescopes Optical gyroscopes Data centres/computer interconnects Financial traders You can’t beat vacuum for loss, speed of light or stability! The Very Large Telescope Interferometer (VLTI) on Paranal Mountain Data Centre Interconnection Information flow/unit area and latency is key in supercomputers and data centres 20,000 km of fibre per data centre in Facebook alone! Vacuum transit time is 30% lower High-performance: applications in inertial guidance, navigation, platform stabilization, GPS flywheeling, etc. Lower-performance: Consumer / industrial applications in Performancemotion control, industrial limited processing, byconsumer glass electronics, core etc. Periodic lattice of holes Hollow air core Advantage: Typically less than 0.1% optical power in cladding. Ultra-low nonlinearity, lower loss? Vacuum fibre technology Fibres that largely ignore the materials from which they are made Power in glass < 0.01% low nonlinearity Transmission loss < 0.01 dB/m As you wouldLow Latencyexpect (30% from lower) vacuum! Phase insensitive Radiation hard IR transmitting The new anti-resonant fibre 22.3 µm 40.2 µm Width = 359.6 nm 20μm OFC 2016, Los Angeles, PDPTh5A.3 Low Latency data communications • Data transmission at 99.7% the speed of light in vacuum • ‘Only’ 69.4% in a conventional fibre Latency savings (vs conventional fibres): 1m 1.54 ns 100m 154 ns 1km 1.54 µs 100km 154 µs Phase Insensitive Fibres The phase of a signal in a fibre changes with temperature owing to: • Change in refractive index • Change in fibre length • Vacuum fibre temperature sensitivity 2 ps/km/K • 18.5 times smaller than conventional fibres Dr Radan Slavik Slavik et al., Scientific Reports 2015. -
The Day of Miracles. Kramnik Took the Lead. Prestige Goal by Ivanchuk. This
The day of miracles. Kramnik took the lead. Prestige goal by Ivanchuk. This are not the whole list of headlines after round 12 in Candidates Tournament in London. Long Friday was really long Friday. For the first time in the tournament absolutely all games finished after first time control and 40 moves. Today I will continue with ecologically clean annotations (Totally without computer analyzes) “online” comments by IM &FT Vladimir Poley. Text of the games you can find on organisers home page. Pairs of the day: Magnus Carlsen –Vasily Ivanchuk Levon Aroian – Vladimir Kramnik Teimour Radjabov – Alexander Grischuk Boris Gelfand-Peter Svidler Magnus avoid Rossolimo today and said straight no to Cheljabinsk (Sveshnikov) variation by 3.Nc3. Vasily after 5 minutes thought decided to transfer his Sicilian defense into Taimanov variation, old and solid version. Alternative was 3...e5, but this can lead after transformation into “The Spanish torture” where Magnus feels like fish in the water. Kramnik chosen improved Tarrash defense against Aronian. The difference from normal Tarrash- is no isolated pawn on d5. Radjabov-Grischuk- easy going with draw reputation Queens Gambit variation, probably quickpeace agreement. Both players lost chances and not enough motivated. Gelfand plays anti-Grunfeld variation. To go into the main lines against biggest Grunfeld expert Svidler was not an option. Boris will look for fishy on sides. Grischuk invites to some pawns capture for advantage in development in return and started to shake the boat. I don’t believe that Teimour will accept the gifts. Just normal Nf3 will be good neutral response. Aronian decided to get isolany himself. -
A Feast of Chess in Time of Plague – Candidates Tournament 2020
A FEAST OF CHESS IN TIME OF PLAGUE CANDIDATES TOURNAMENT 2020 Part 1 — Yekaterinburg by Vladimir Tukmakov www.thinkerspublishing.com Managing Editor Romain Edouard Assistant Editor Daniël Vanheirzeele Translator Izyaslav Koza Proofreader Bob Holliman Graphic Artist Philippe Tonnard Cover design Mieke Mertens Typesetting i-Press ‹www.i-press.pl› First edition 2020 by Th inkers Publishing A Feast of Chess in Time of Plague. Candidates Tournament 2020. Part 1 — Yekaterinburg Copyright © 2020 Vladimir Tukmakov All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission from the publisher. ISBN 978-94-9251-092-1 D/2020/13730/26 All sales or enquiries should be directed to Th inkers Publishing, 9850 Landegem, Belgium. e-mail: [email protected] website: www.thinkerspublishing.com TABLE OF CONTENTS KEY TO SYMBOLS 5 INTRODUCTION 7 PRELUDE 11 THE PLAY Round 1 21 Round 2 44 Round 3 61 Round 4 80 Round 5 94 Round 6 110 Round 7 127 Final — Round 8 141 UNEXPECTED CONCLUSION 143 INTERIM RESULTS 147 KEY TO SYMBOLS ! a good move ?a weak move !! an excellent move ?? a blunder !? an interesting move ?! a dubious move only move =equality unclear position with compensation for the sacrifi ced material White stands slightly better Black stands slightly better White has a serious advantage Black has a serious advantage +– White has a decisive advantage –+ Black has a decisive advantage with an attack with initiative with counterplay with the idea of better is worse is Nnovelty +check #mate INTRODUCTION In the middle of the last century tournament compilations were ex- tremely popular. -
Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited
Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical—Revisited Wojciech H. Zurek This paper has a somewhat unusual origin and, as a consequence, an unusual structure. It is built on the principle embraced by families who outgrow their dwellings and decide to add a few rooms to their existing structures instead of start- ing from scratch. These additions usually “show,” but the whole can still be quite pleasing to the eye, combining the old and the new in a functional way. What follows is such a “remodeling” of the paper I wrote a dozen years ago for Physics Today (1991). The old text (with some modifications) is interwoven with the new text, but the additions are set off in boxes throughout this article and serve as a commentary on new developments as they relate to the original. The references appear together at the end. In 1991, the study of decoherence was still a rather new subject, but already at that time, I had developed a feeling that most implications about the system’s “immersion” in the environment had been discovered in the preceding 10 years, so a review was in order. While writing it, I had, however, come to suspect that the small gaps in the landscape of the border territory between the quantum and the classical were actually not that small after all and that they presented excellent opportunities for further advances. Indeed, I am surprised and gratified by how much the field has evolved over the last decade. The role of decoherence was recognized by a wide spectrum of practic- 86 Los Alamos Science Number 27 2002 ing physicists as well as, beyond physics proper, by material scientists and philosophers. -
Online Particle Physics Information
1 Online Particle Physics Information Online Particle Physics Information 1 Introduction . 1 2 Particle Data Group (PDG) resources . 2 3 Particle Physics Information Platforms . 2 4 Literature Databases . 3 5 Particle Physics Journals and Conference Proceedings Series . 4 6 Conference Databases . 4 7 Research Institutions . 4 8 People........................................... 4 9 Experiments . 5 10 Jobs............................................ 5 11 Software Packages and Repositories . 6 11.1 Particle Physics Software . 6 11.2 Astrophysics Software . 7 11.3 Web Apps . 8 11.4 Mobile Apps . 8 12 Data repositories . 8 12.1 Particle Physics . 8 12.2 Astrophysics . 9 12.3 General Physics . 10 13 Data preservation activities . 10 13.1 Particle Physics . 10 13.2 Astrophysics . 11 14 Particle Physics Education and Outreach Sites . 11 14.1 Science Educators’ Networks . 11 14.2 Physics Courses . 12 14.3 Masterclasses . 12 14.4 General Sites . 13 14.5 General Physics Activities . 13 14.6 Particle Physics Activities . 13 14.7 Lab Education Offices . 15 14.8 Educational Programs of Experiments . 17 14.9 News . 18 14.10 Art in Physics . 19 14.11 Blogs and Twitter . 19 Revised August 2019 by M. Moskovic (CERN). 1 Introduction The collection of online information resources in particle physics and related areas presented in this chapter is of necessity incomplete. An expanded and regularly updated online version can be found at: http://library.cern/particle_physics_information Suggestions for additions and updates are very welcome.1 1Please send comments and corrections to [email protected] M. Tanabashi et al. (Particle Data Group), Phys. Rev. D 98, 030001 (2018) and 2019 update 6th December, 2019 11:48am 2 Online Particle Physics Information 2 Particle Data Group (PDG) resources • Review of Particle Physics (RPP): A comprehensive report on the fields of particle physics and related areas of cosmology and astrophysics, including both review articles and a compilation/evaluation of data on particle properties. -
EUGENE PAUL WIGNER November 17, 1902–January 1, 1995
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES E U G ENE PAUL WI G NER 1902—1995 A Biographical Memoir by FR E D E R I C K S E I T Z , E RICH V OG T , A N D AL V I N M. W E I NBER G Any opinions expressed in this memoir are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Academy of Sciences. Biographical Memoir COPYRIGHT 1998 NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS WASHINGTON D.C. Courtesy of Atoms for Peace Awards, Inc. EUGENE PAUL WIGNER November 17, 1902–January 1, 1995 BY FREDERICK SEITZ, ERICH VOGT, AND ALVIN M. WEINBERG UGENE WIGNER WAS A towering leader of modern physics Efor more than half of the twentieth century. While his greatest renown was associated with the introduction of sym- metry theory to quantum physics and chemistry, for which he was awarded the Nobel Prize in physics for 1963, his scientific work encompassed an astonishing breadth of sci- ence, perhaps unparalleled during his time. In preparing this memoir, we have the impression we are attempting to record the monumental achievements of half a dozen scientists. There is the Wigner who demonstrated that symmetry principles are of great importance in quan- tum mechanics; who pioneered the application of quantum mechanics in the fields of chemical kinetics and the theory of solids; who was the first nuclear engineer; who formu- lated many of the most basic ideas in nuclear physics and nuclear chemistry; who was the prophet of quantum chaos; who served as a mathematician and philosopher of science; and the Wigner who was the supervisor and mentor of more than forty Ph.D. -
A Book About Razuvaev.Indb
Compiled by Boris Postovsky Devoted to Chess The Creative Heritage of Yuri Razuvaev New In Chess 2019 Contents Preface – From the compiler . 7 Foreword – Memories of a chess academic . 9 ‘Memories’ authors in alphabetical order . 16 Chapter 1 – Memories of Razuvaev’s contemporaries – I . 17 Garry Kasparov . 17 Anatoly Karpov . 19 Boris Spassky . 20 Veselin Topalov . .22 Viswanathan Anand . 23 Magnus Carlsen . 23 Boris Postovsky . 23 Chapter 2 – Selected games . 43 1962-1973 – the early years . 43 1975-1978 – grandmaster . 73 1979-1982 – international successes . 102 1983-1986 – expert in many areas . 138 1987-1995 – always easy and clean . 168 Chapter 3 – Memories of Razuvaev’s contemporaries – II . 191 Evgeny Tomashevsky . 191 Boris Gulko . 199 Boris Gelfand . 201 Lyudmila Belavenets . 202 Vladimir Tukmakov . .202 Irina Levitina . 204 Grigory Kaidanov . 206 Michal Krasenkow . 207 Evgeny Bareev . 208 Joel Lautier . 209 Michele Godena . 213 Alexandra Kosteniuk . 215 5 Devoted to Chess Chapter 4 – Articles and interviews (by and with Yuri Razuvaev) . 217 Confessions of a grandmaster . 217 My Gambit . 218 The Four Knights Opening . 234 The gambit syndrome . 252 A game of ghosts . 258 You are right, Monsieur De la Bourdonnais!! . 267 In the best traditions of the Soviet school of chess . 276 A lesson with Yuri Razuvaev . 283 A sharp turn . 293 Extreme . 299 The Botvinnik System . 311 ‘How to develop your intellect’ . 315 ‘I am with Tal, we all developed from Botvinnik . ’. 325 Chapter 5 – Memories of Razuvaev’s contemporaries – III . .331 Igor Zaitsev . 331 Alexander Nikitin . 332 Albert Kapengut . 332 Alexander Shashin . 335 Boris Zlotnik . 337 Lev Khariton . 337 Sergey Yanovsky . -
The 2018 Physics Prize
Nobel Prize Lessons 2018 Teacher’s manuscript – the 2018 Physics Prize The Nobel Prize in Physics • The Nobel Prize in Physics is one of the five prizes founded by Alfred Nobel and awarded on December 10 every year. Before Alfred Nobel died on December 10, 1896, he wrote in his will that the largest part of his fortune should be placed in a fund. The yearly interest on this fund would pay for a prize given to “those who, during the preceding year, shall have conferred the greatest benefit to humankind.” ’ Who is rewarded with the Physics Prize? • This Prize rewards important discoveries or inventions in the field of physics. The development of “wireless telegraphy” (radio) is one example. Another is discoveries about how stars behave. • Guglielmo Marconi and Karl Ferdinand Braun received the Physics Prize in 1909 for the development of radio (“wireless telegraphy”). Subramanyan Chandrasekhar received the 1983 Prize for studying processes of importance to the structure and evolution of the stars. • Three women have been awarded the Physics Prize: • Maria Goeppert Mayer who made the first advanced model of nuclear structure, Marie Curie for pioneering research on radiation and the discovery of the elements radium and polonium and Donna Strickland, awarded with the 2018 Nobel Prize in Physics “for groundbreaking inventions in the field of laser physics”. Physics Prize 2018 • The 2018 Nobel Prize in Physics is all about laser technology. One half of the Prize is being awarded for a tool for capturing and manipulating various particles. The other half rewards a technique for intensifying and speeding up pulsing laser light, beyond what was previously believed possible.