Animal Consciousness: a Synthetic Approach

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

TINS-719; No of Pages 9 Review Animal consciousness: a synthetic approach David B. Edelman1 and Anil K. Seth2 1 The Neurosciences Institute, 10640 John Jay Hopkins Drive, San Diego, CA 92121, USA 2 Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton BN1 9QJ, UK Despite anecdotal evidence suggesting conscious states neuroanatomical evidence. Human studies involving the in a variety of non-human animals, no systematic neu- correlation of accurate report with neural correlates can roscientific investigation of animal consciousness has provide a valuable benchmark for assessing evidence from yet been undertaken. We set forth a framework for such studies of animal behavior and neurophysiology. A con- an investigation that incorporates integration of data straint on this strategy is that the capacity for accurate from neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, and behavioral report of conscious contents implies the presence of higher- studies, uses evidence from humans as a benchmark, order consciousness, which in advanced forms may require and recognizes the critical role of explicit verbal report of linguistically-based narrative capability. This is in con- conscious experiences in human studies. We illustrate trast to primary consciousness, which entails the ability our framework with reference to two subphyla: one to create a scene in the ‘remembered present’ [3] in the relatively near to mammals – birds – and one quite far absence of language. Primary consciousness may be a basic –cephalopod molluscs. Consistent with the possibility of biological process in both humans and animals lacking true conscious states, both subphyla exhibit complex beha- language. vior and possess sophisticated nervous systems. Their Various properties of human consciousness can be further investigation may reveal common phyletic con- identified at the neural, behavioral, and phenomenal levels ditions and neural substrates underlying the emergence [4]. Neural correlates of human consciousness include of animal consciousness. the presence of thalamocortical signaling, fast, irregular, A synthetic framework for studying animal Glossary consciousness Although Darwin proposed that animal and human minds Accurate report: a first-person account of what an individual is experiencing, made without the attempt to mislead. Accurate report, which can be given alike are the products of natural selection [1], questions of through language or related varieties of voluntary response, has been critical in animal consciousness were largely neglected throughout the investigation of conscious states in humans. In animals without the faculty th of natural language, forms of behavioral report acting through other motor the 20 century (but see Griffin [2]; note the term ‘animal’ channels might be examined to determine the possible presence of high-order is used here to mean ‘non-human animal’). This neglect discriminations suggesting conscious states. may have arisen in part because, seemingly, only humans Binocular rivalry: this occurs when the two eyes are each simultaneously presented with a different image. Rather than seeing both images super- are capable of accurately describing their phenomenal imposed on one another, the subject sees one image first, then the other, in an experience. However, there is now abundant and increas- alternating sequence. For example, if one eye is presented with parallel vertical ing behavioral and neurophysiological evidence consistent stripes and the other with parallel horizontal stripes, rather than seeing an overlapping ‘weave’ of vertical and horizontal stripes, the subject sees first one with, and even suggestive of, conscious states in some orientation of stripes, then the other [83]. animals. We will use humans as a benchmark for the Explanatory correlates of consciousness: Conventional approaches within development of new empirical criteria for further investi- consciousness science have emphasized the search for so-called ‘neural correlates of consciousness’: neural activity having privileged status in the gation. Here we apply this approach to birds and cepha- generation of conscious experience [7]. However, the transition from correla- lopod molluscs, subphyla that exhibit complex cognitive tion to explanation requires an explanation of how particular neural correlates faculties and behaviors and have strikingly elaborate account for specific properties of consciousness. Searches for explanatory correlates of consciousness attempt to provide this link [11,14]. brains. These two subphyla are examples of highly distinct Primary consciousness: this refers to the experience of a multimodal scene lineages, and their study provides an excellent opportunity composed of basic perceptual and motor events. Primary consciousness is to examine how conscious states might be instantiated in sometimes called perceptual or phenomenal consciousness, and it may be present in animals without true language. very different nervous systems. While we do not resolve Higher-order consciousness: this, by contrast, involves the referral of the this issue here, we propose that its examination lies within contents of primary consciousness to interpretative semantics, including a sense of self and, in more advanced forms, the ability to explicitly construct the reach of contemporary neuroscience. past and future narratives [3]. The presence of higher order consciousness or metacognition should not be assumed to be necessary for the ascription of Humans as a benchmark primary consciousness, though it may be constitutively required for advanced forms of self-consciousness and consciousness of consciousness (Box 2). The notion that consciousness can be engendered in Transitive inference: the ability to connect two or more separate relations, and is different nervous systems by a variety of underlying mech- widely regarded as a fundamental process in reasoning. Such abilities have been anisms suggests a need to examine constraints, and there- demonstrated in certain birds. For example, in experiments involving the relative ranking of objects presented in pairs, pigeons were able to determine that B>D fore to synthesize behavioral, neurophysiological, and after they had separately learned that A>B, B>C, C>D, and D>E, while great tits have been observed to deduce complex social dominance rankings [30]. Corresponding author: Edelman, D.B. ([email protected]). 0166-2236/$ – see front matter ß 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2009.05.008 Available online xxxxxx 1 TINS-719; No of Pages 9 Review Trends in Neurosciences Vol.xxx No.x Figure 1. The investigation of possible conscious states in non-human species as disparate as birds (a) and cephalopods (b) can be informed by searching for neural properties that have been correlated with consciousness in humans, including reentrant signaling between thalamus and cortex (a, i) or putative functional analogs (b, i), fast, irregular, low-amplitude EEG signals (a and b, ii), and widespread electrical activity in cortex (a, iii) or functionally analogous structures (b, iii). Such processes in animals can best be related to consciousness when they can be correlated with accurate reports. Relevant forms of report include vocalizations in the case of African grey parrots (a, iv) or coloration and body patterning in the case of cephalopods (b, iv). In the figure, an African grey parrot and a common octopus (O. vulgaris) respond to salient artificial stimuli presented on video displays: an orange block in a discrimination task (a, iv) and a white ball that has been previously associated with food (herring) during training (b, iv) (see Box 1). low-amplitude electroencephalographic (EEG) signals, and cognitive) access to primary conscious contents, which may widespread cortical activity correlated with conscious con- not be constitutively required for primary consciousness. tents [5–7]. At the behavioral level, consciousness has been Our approach therefore recognizes that the mechanisms associated with behavioral flexibility [8], rational action responsible for primary consciousness may be distinct from [9], and certain forms of conditioning [10]. These can be those mechanisms enabling its report. related to cognitive properties involving widespread access The extent to which neural evidence can account for and associativity [8], multiple discriminations [11], and the phenomenal properties is particularly important with capacity for accurate report [5]. These properties can be respect to those properties that are common to most or mapped to a variety of functions related to consciousness all conscious experiences. For example, in humans, every [12]. At the phenomenal level, human consciousness conscious scene is both integrated (i.e. ‘all of a piece’) and involves the presence of a sensorimotor scene, the exist- differentiated (i.e. composed of many different parts) [11]. ence of a first-person perspective, the experience of Therefore, finding neural processes that themselves exhi- emotions, moods, and a sense of agency [13–14]. bit simultaneous integration and differentiation would Using humans as a benchmark, behavioral, cognitive, help to explain, and not merely correlate with, the corre- and neural properties can be employed as empirical sponding phenomenal property. Such neural processes can criteria informing the ascription of conscious states to therefore be considered to be ‘explanatory correlates of animals (Figure 1). The application of this approach consciousness’ [14], and because they are explanatory,
Recommended publications
  • Cephalopods and the Evolution of the Mind

    Cephalopods and the Evolution of the Mind

    Cephalopods and the Evolution of the Mind Peter Godfrey-Smith The Graduate Center City University of New York Pacific Conservation Biology 19 (2013): 4-9. In thinking about the nature of the mind and its evolutionary history, cephalopods – especially octopuses, cuttlefish, and squid – have a special importance. These animals are an independent experiment in the evolution of large and complex nervous systems – in the biological machinery of the mind. They evolved this machinery on a historical lineage distant from our own. Where their minds differ from ours, they show us another way of being a sentient organism. Where we are similar, this is due to the convergence of distinct evolutionary paths. I introduced the topic just now as 'the mind.' This is a contentious term to use. What is it to have a mind? One option is that we are looking for something close to what humans have –– something like reflective and conscious thought. This sets a high bar for having a mind. Another possible view is that whenever organisms adapt to their circumstances in real time by adjusting their behavior, taking in information and acting in response to it, there is some degree of mentality or intelligence there. To say this sets a low bar. It is best not to set bars in either place. Roughly speaking, we are dealing with a matter of degree, though 'degree' is not quite the right term either. The evolution of a mind is the acquisition of a tool-kit for the control of behavior. The tool-kit includes some kind of perception, though different animals have very different ways of taking in information from the world.
  • Animal Welfare and the Paradox of Animal Consciousness

    Animal Welfare and the Paradox of Animal Consciousness

    ARTICLE IN PRESS Animal Welfare and the Paradox of Animal Consciousness Marian Dawkins1 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK 1Corresponding author: e-mail address: [email protected] Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Animal Consciousness: The Heart of the Paradox 2 2.1 Behaviorism Applies to Other People Too 5 3. Human Emotions and Animals Emotions 7 3.1 Physiological Indicators of Emotion 7 3.2 Behavioral Components of Emotion 8 3.2.1 Vacuum Behavior 10 3.2.2 Rebound 10 3.2.3 “Abnormal” Behavior 10 3.2.4 The Animal’s Point of View 11 3.2.5 Cognitive Bias 15 3.2.6 Expressions of the Emotions 15 3.3 The Third Component of Emotion: Consciousness 16 4. Definitions of Animal Welfare 24 5. Conclusions 26 References 27 1. INTRODUCTION Consciousness has always been both central to and a stumbling block for animal welfare. On the one hand, the belief that nonhuman animals suffer and feel pain is what draws many people to want to study animal welfare in the first place. Animal welfare is seen as fundamentally different from plant “welfare” or the welfare of works of art precisely because of the widely held belief that animals have feelings and experience emotions in ways that plants or inanimate objectsdhowever valuableddo not (Midgley, 1983; Regan, 1984; Rollin, 1989; Singer, 1975). On the other hand, consciousness is also the most elusive and difficult to study of any biological phenomenon (Blackmore, 2012; Koch, 2004). Even with our own human consciousness, we are still baffled as to how Advances in the Study of Behavior, Volume 47 ISSN 0065-3454 © 2014 Elsevier Inc.
  • The Three Neurogenetic Phases of Human Consciousness: the Possibility of Transhuman and Posthuman Consciousness

    The Three Neurogenetic Phases of Human Consciousness: the Possibility of Transhuman and Posthuman Consciousness

    International Journal of Arts & Sciences, CD-ROM. ISSN: 1944-6934 :: 07(02):381–394 (2014) Copyright c 2014 by UniversityPublications.net THE THREE NEUROGENETIC PHASES OF HUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS: THE POSSIBILITY OF TRANSHUMAN AND POSTHUMAN CONSCIOUSNESS John K. Grandy In previous works, the first neurogenetic account of human consciousness has been established and was delineated into three distinct phases- the emergence of neuron-based consciousness, the continuum of neuron-based consciousness, and neurodegeneration [1, 2].In this model, DNA consciousness gives rise to human consciousness in the form of neurogenetic correlates of consciousness (NgCC) and then the NgCC underlying the neurons provide continuous activity during the conscious experience. This engenders a continuum of neuron-based consciousness working in tandem with a neurogenetic substructure. Unfortunately, later in life the neurons wear down and modalities of human consciousness are decreased or lost [3]. This loss can proceed in an age-related fashion as seen in mild cognitive impairment or this process can have a genetic component as seen in Alzheimer disease (AD). Currently, genetic experiments are underway to reverse some of the symptoms of AD, e.g., the FGF-2 gene transfer for memory improvement in mice with AD [4]. However, in the future can this, or similar, genetic therapies be used to enhance human consciousness in patients without AD? Would this be the first steps into posthuman consciousness? In 2009, it was proposed and supported that genetic engineering technology may provide the opportunity for a selected genetic destination [5] .This would make it possible to select a phenotype or genetic endpoint and make it possible in any organism including humans.
  • A Theory of Consciousness: Computation, Algorithm, and Neurobiological Realization

    A Theory of Consciousness: Computation, Algorithm, and Neurobiological Realization

    Preprint (version 20 June 2019) A theory of consciousness: computation, algorithm, and neurobiological realization J. H. van Hateren Johann Bernoulli Institute for Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Groningen, The Netherlands; [email protected] Abstract The most enigmatic aspect of consciousness is the fact that it is felt, as a subjective sensation. The theory proposed here aims to explain this particular aspect. The theory encompasses both the computation that is presumably involved and the way in which that computation may be realized in the brain’s neurobiology. It is assumed that the brain makes an internal estimate of an individual’s own evolutionary fitness, which can be shown to produce a special, distinct form of causation. Communicating components of the fitness estimate (either for external or internal use) requires inverting them. Such inversion can be performed by the thalamocortical feedback loop in the mammalian brain, if that loop is operating in a switched, dual-stage mode. A first (nonconscious) stage produces forward estimates, whereas the second (conscious) stage inverts those estimates. It is argued that inversion produces another special, distinct form of causation, which is spatially localized and is plausibly sensed as the feeling of consciousness. Keywords Consciousness · Sentience · Evolution · Fitness · Estimation · Thalamocortical 1 Introduction The terms ‘consciousness’ and ‘conscious’ have various meanings. They may refer to the state of being awake (as in ‘regaining consciousness’), the process of gaining access to certain facts as they affect the senses or are retrieved from memory (as in ‘becoming conscious of something’), and the subjective sensation associated with experiencing (e.g., when feeling pain or joy, and when undergoing a visual experience).
  • Wild Animal Suffering and Vegan Outreach

    Wild Animal Suffering and Vegan Outreach

    Paez, Eze (2016) Wild animal suffering and vegan outreach. Animal Sentience 7(11) DOI: 10.51291/2377-7478.1101 This article has appeared in the journal Animal Sentience, a peer-reviewed journal on animal cognition and feeling. It has been made open access, free for all, by WellBeing International and deposited in the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Animal Sentience 2016.087: Paez Commentary on Ng on Animal Suffering Wild animal suffering and vegan outreach Commentary on Ng on Animal Suffering Eze Paez Department of Legal, Moral and Political Philosophy Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona Abstract: Ng’s strategic proposal seems to downplay the potential benefits of advocacy for wild animals and omit what may be the most effective strategy to reduce the harms farmed animals suffer: vegan outreach. Eze Paez, lecturer in moral and political philosophy at Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, studies normative and applied ethics, especially ontological and normative aspects of abortion and the moral consideration of nonhuman animals. He is a member of Animal Ethics. upf.academia.edu/ezepaez Underestimating the importance of wild animal suffering. Ng’s (2016) view is not that animal advocates should focus only on farmed animals, to the exclusion of those that live in the wild. He concedes that our efforts must also be directed toward raising awareness of the harms suffered by animals in nature. Nonetheless, he seems to suggest that these efforts should be minimal relative to those devoted to reducing the harms farmed animals suffer. Ng underestimates the potential benefits of advocacy for wild animals in terms of net reduction in suffering perhaps because he is overestimating people’s resistance to caring about wild animals and to intervening in nature on their behalf.
  • Theoretical Models of Consciousness: a Scoping Review

    Theoretical Models of Consciousness: a Scoping Review

    brain sciences Review Theoretical Models of Consciousness: A Scoping Review Davide Sattin 1,2,*, Francesca Giulia Magnani 1, Laura Bartesaghi 1, Milena Caputo 1, Andrea Veronica Fittipaldo 3, Martina Cacciatore 1, Mario Picozzi 4 and Matilde Leonardi 1 1 Neurology, Public Health, Disability Unit—Scientific Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, 20133 Milan, Italy; [email protected] (F.G.M.); [email protected] (L.B.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (M.L.) 2 Experimental Medicine and Medical Humanities-PhD Program, Biotechnology and Life Sciences Department and Center for Clinical Ethics, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy 3 Oncology Department, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, 20156 Milan, Italy; veronicaandrea.fi[email protected] 4 Center for Clinical Ethics, Biotechnology and Life Sciences Department, Insubria University, 21100 Varese, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-02-2394-2709 Abstract: The amount of knowledge on human consciousness has created a multitude of viewpoints and it is difficult to compare and synthesize all the recent scientific perspectives. Indeed, there are many definitions of consciousness and multiple approaches to study the neural correlates of consciousness (NCC). Therefore, the main aim of this article is to collect data on the various theories of consciousness published between 2007–2017 and to synthesize them to provide a general overview of this topic. To describe each theory, we developed a thematic grid called the dimensional model, which qualitatively and quantitatively analyzes how each article, related to one specific theory, debates/analyzes a specific issue.
  • Comparative Evolutionary Approach to Pain Perception in Fishes

    Comparative Evolutionary Approach to Pain Perception in Fishes

    Brown, Culum (2016) Comparative evolutionary approach to pain perception in fishes. Animal Sentience 3(5) DOI: 10.51291/2377-7478.1029 This article has appeared in the journal Animal Sentience, a peer-reviewed journal on animal cognition and feeling. It has been made open access, free for all, by WellBeing International and deposited in the WBI Studies Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Animal Sentience 2016.011: Brown Commentary on Key on Fish Pain Comparative evolutionary approach to pain perception in fishes Commentary on Key on Fish Pain Culum Brown Biological Sciences Macquarie University Abstract: Arguments against the fact that fish feel pain repeatedly appear even in the face of growing evidence that they do. The standards used to judge pain perception keep moving as the hurdles are repeatedly cleared by novel research findings. There is undoubtedly a vested commercial interest in proving that fish do not feel pain, so the topic has a half-life well past its due date. Key (2016) reiterates previous perspectives on this topic characterised by a black-or-white view that is based on the proposed role of the human cortex in pain perception. I argue that this is incongruent with our understanding of evolutionary processes. Keywords: pain, fishes, behaviour, physiology, nociception Culum Brown [email protected] studies the behavioural ecology of fishes with a special interest in learning and memory. He is Associate Professor of vertebrate evolution at Macquarie University, Co-Editor of the volume Fish Cognition and Behavior, and Editor for Animal Behaviour of the Journal of Fish Biology.
  • The Evolution of Human Vocal Emotion

    The Evolution of Human Vocal Emotion

    EMR0010.1177/1754073920930791Emotion ReviewBryant 930791research-article2020 SPECIAL SECTION: EMOTION IN THE VOICE Emotion Review Vol. 13, No. 1 (January 2021) 25 –33 © The Author(s) 2020 ISSN 1754-0739 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073920930791 10.1177/1754073920930791 The Evolution of Human Vocal Emotion https://journals.sagepub.com/home/emr Gregory A. Bryant Department of Communication, Center for Behavior, Evolution, and Culture, University of California, Los Angeles, USA Abstract Vocal affect is a subcomponent of emotion programs that coordinate a variety of physiological and psychological systems. Emotional vocalizations comprise a suite of vocal behaviors shaped by evolution to solve adaptive social communication problems. The acoustic forms of vocal emotions are often explicable with reference to the communicative functions they serve. An adaptationist approach to vocal emotions requires that we distinguish between evolved signals and byproduct cues, and understand vocal affect as a collection of multiple strategic communicative systems subject to the evolutionary dynamics described by signaling theory. We should expect variability across disparate societies in vocal emotion according to culturally evolved pragmatic rules, and universals in vocal production and perception to the extent that form–function relationships are present. Keywords emotion, evolution, signaling, vocal affect Emotional communication is central to social life for many ani- 2001; Pisanski, Cartei, McGettigan, Raine, & Reby, 2016; mals. Beginning with Darwin
  • Science News | December 19, 2009 Feature | Humans Wonder, Anybody Home?

    Science News | December 19, 2009 Feature | Humans Wonder, Anybody Home?

    FEATURE | HUMANS WONDER, ANYBODY HOME? To prevent Shania the octopus from becom- Humans wonder, ing bored, keepers at the National Aquarium in Washington, D.C., gave her a Mr. Potato Head filled with fish to snuggle. Researchers anybody are now looking beyond behavior into the brain for signs of awareness in birds and invertebrates. home? Brain structure and circuitry offer clues to consciousness in nonmammals By Susan Gaidos ne afternoon while participat­ except for the fact that Betty was a New ing in studies in a University Caledonian crow. of Oxford lab, Abel snatched Betty isn’t the only crow with such a hook away from Betty, leav­ conceptual ingenuity. Nor are crows the Oing her without a tool to complete a task. only members of the animal kingdom to Spying a piece of straight wire nearby, exhibit similar mental powers. Animals POST WASHINGTON THE she picked it up, bent one end into a can do all sorts of clever things: Studies EARY/ L ’ hook and used it to finish the job. Noth­ of chimpanzees, gorillas, dolphins and O ILL ing about this story was remarkable, birds have found that some can add, B 22 | SCIENCE NEWS | December 19, 2009 www.sciencenews.org FEATURE | HUMANS WONDER, ANYBODY HOME? subtract, create sentences, plan ahead objects in their visual field. “This raises or deceive others. the intriguing question whether con­ Brain-on-brain comparisons To carry out such tasks, these animals scious experience requires the specific In an effort to find signs of conscious- ness, scientists are identifying analo- must be drawing on past experiences and structure of human or primate brains,” gous structures (same coloring) among then using them along with immediate biologist Donald Griffin wrote inAnimal the brains of humans, birds, octopuses perceptions to make sense of it all.
  • Going Beyond Just-So Stories Response to Commentary on Key on Fish Pain

    Going Beyond Just-So Stories Response to Commentary on Key on Fish Pain

    Animal Sentience 2016.022: Response to Commentary on Key on Fish Pain Going beyond just-so stories Response to Commentary on Key on Fish Pain Brian Key School of Biomedical Sciences University of Queensland Abstract: Colloquial arguments for fish feeling pain are deeply rooted in anthropometric tendencies that confuse escape responses to noxious stimuli with evidence for consciousness. More developed arguments often rely on just-so stories of fish displaying complex behaviours as proof of consciousness. In response to commentaries on the idea that fish do not feel pain, I raise the need to go beyond just-so stories and to rigorously analyse the neural circuitry responsible for specific behaviours using new and emerging technologies in neuroscience. By deciphering the causal relationship between neural information processing and conscious behaviour, it should be possible to assess cogently the likelihood of whether a vertebrate species has the neural hardware necessary to — at least — support the feeling of pain. Brian Key [email protected] is Head of the Brain Growth and Regeneration Lab at the University of Queensland. He is dedicated to understanding the principles of stem cell biology, differentiation, axon guidance, plasticity, regeneration and development of the brain. http://www.uq.edu.au/sbms/staff/brian-key Just-so stories In this response to commentaries on the target article “Fish do not feel pain” (Key), I do not plan to interrogate either the putative behavioural evidence or the just-so stories previously proposed as supportive of fish feeling pain (Balcombe; Braithwaite & Droege; Broom; Brown; Dinets; Ng). These claims have been adequately addressed and refuted in recent literature (Key, 2015a and 2015b; Rose et al., 2014).
  • JAGE-691 Fish Cognition and Consciousness Colin Allen Colallen@Indiana.Edu Phone

    JAGE-691 Fish Cognition and Consciousness Colin Allen [email protected] Phone

    JAGE-691 Fish Cognition and Consciousness Colin Allen [email protected] phone: +1-812-606-0881 fax: +1-812-855-3631 Program in Cognitive Science and Department of History and Philosophy of Science Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA ABSTRACT. Questions about fish consciousness and cognition are receiving increasing attention. In this paper, I explain why one must be careful to avoid drawing conclusions too hastily about this hugely di- verse set of species. Keywords. Fish, learning, cognition, consciousness 1. Introduction to the controversy The cognitive and mental capacities of fish are a current topic of scientific controversy, and consciousness is the most contentious of topics. In a recent review article, Michel Cabanac and coauthors (Cabanac et al. 2009) argue that consciousness did not emerge until the early Amniota, the group of species that includes mammals, birds, and "reptiles.” The latter term is in scare quotes because biologists consider it a paraphy- letic group (i.e., a group that contains just a subset of the descendants of its common ancestor) that is im- proper for classification purposes due to its exclusion of the birds, which descended from the saurians. Amniotes are characterized by an embryonic membrane that makes terrestrial reproduction feasible. The amphibians, lacking this adaptation, are constrained to place their eggs in an aqueous environment for proper development. These biological details are important because of the nature of some of the evidence that Cabanac et al. bring to bear on the question of consciousness in fish – evidence that I shall maintain seems skewed towards other adaptations that have to do with terrestrial life.
  • Neurobiological Theories of Consciousness. In

    Neurobiological Theories of Consciousness. In

    CONS: 00055 a0005 Neurobiological Theories of Consciousness S Kouider, Laboratoire des Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, CNRS/EHESS/ENS-DEC, Paris, France ã 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Cognitive Influences on Neurobiological Glossary s0010 Accounts g0005 Neural correlates of consciousness –They p0010 are defined by Christoph Koch as ‘‘The Regarding the influence of cognitive theories, minimal set of neuronal mechanisms or the majority of neurobiological accounts can be events jointly sufficient for a specific seen, in fact, as extensions of preexisting cognitive conscious percept or experience.’’ They theories (e.g., for instance global workspace the- allow to avoid the difficult problem of directly ories). Indeed, one of the main tasks exercised by looking for neural bases. neurobiologists in the last two decades has been to search for cerebral or neuronal equivalents to the g0010 Panpsychism – Reflects the philosophical functional elements constituting cognitive models doctrine that everything (in Greek, ‘pan’) has PROOF a mind (‘psyche’) and is therefore conscious. (e.g., the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for volun- Some theories presented in this article tary control, or long range axons for connecting endorse a certain form of panpsychism in brain regions associated with ‘unconscious’ and which anything that transmits information is ‘conscious’ processing). Of course, many neuro- in a way conscious. biologists disagree with this approach. Conscious- ness, because it is a biological problem, should be g0015 The hard problem – It is the problem of explaining how and why we have the reframed the other way around, by focusing pri- subjective experience of consciousness. It is marily on its structural basis rather than relying on often contrasted with the easy problem, cognitive theories, often considered too specula- which consists of describing consciousness tive.