DOCSLIB.ORG

Solar Thermochemical Hydrogen Production Research (STCH)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Solar Thermochemical Hydrogen Production Research (STCH) SANDIA REPORT SAND2011-3622 Unlimited Release Printed May 2011 Solar Thermochemical Hydrogen Production Research (STCH) Thermochemical Cycle Selection and Investment Priority Robert Perret Prepared by Sandia National Laboratories Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185 and Livermore, California 94550 Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Approved for public release; further dissemination unlimited. Issued by Sandia National Laboratories, operated for the United States Department of Energy by Sandia Corporation. NOTICE: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government, nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, nor any of their contractors, subcontractors, or their employees, make any warranty, express or implied, or assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors or subcontractors. The views and opinions expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government, any agency thereof, or any of their contractors. Printed in the United States of America. This report has been reproduced directly from the best available copy. Available to DOE and DOE contractors from U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information P.O. Box 62 Oak Ridge, TN 37831 Telephone: (865) 576-8401 Facsimile: (865) 576-5728 E-Mail: [email protected] Online ordering: http://www.osti.gov/bridge Available to the public from U.S. Department of Commerce National Technical Information Service 5285 Port Royal Rd. Springfield, VA 22161 Telephone: (800) 553-6847 Facsimile: (703) 605-6900 E-Mail: [email protected] Online order: http://www.ntis.gov/help/ordermethods.asp?loc=7-4-0#online 2 SAND2011-3622 Unlimited Release Printed May 2011 Solar Thermochemical Hydrogen Production Research (STCH) Thermochemical Cycle Selection and Investment Priority Robert Perret The DOE–EERE Fuel Cell Technologies Program Sandia National Laboratories P.O. Box 969 Livermore, CA. 94551-0969 Abstract Eight cycles in a coordinated set of projects for Solar Thermochemical Cycles for Hydrogen production (STCH) were self-evaluated for the DOE-EERE Fuel Cell Technologies Program at a Working Group Meeting on October 8 and 9, 2008. This document reports the initial selection process for development investment in STCH projects, the evaluation process meant to reduce the number of projects as a means to focus resources on development of a few most-likely-to- succeed efforts, the obstacles encountered in project inventory reduction and the outcomes of the evaluation process. Summary technical status of the projects under evaluation is reported and recommendations identified to improve future project planning and selection activities. 3 Acknowledgements This report is made possible in whole due to the excellent work undertaken by the STCH Team comprised of scientists and engineers from Sandia National Laboratories, Argonne National Laboratory, Savannah River National Laboratory, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, TIAX, LLC, the University of Colorado, the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, General Atomics Corporation and its collaborators from the Weizmann Institute, and SAIC and its subcontractors from the Florida Solar Energy Center and Electrosynthesis, Inc. Data and analysis representing efforts by these team members will be found throughout this report. Support by the DOE-EERE Fuel Cell Technologies Program is gratefully acknowledged. Sandia National Laboratories has been generous in its technical support of drafting the document and its excellent recommendations for improving the document are gratefully acknowledged. The same gratitude is extended to staff members of the DOE-EERE Fuel Cell Technologies Program who ably assisted this author in navigating the complex stream of propriety associated with multiple sponsorship and Congressional authority. 4 Contents 1 Introduction....................................................................................................................... 11 1.1 STCH Basis ............................................................................................................... 11 1.2 STCH Historical Summary ......................................................................................... 13 1.3 STCH Decision Framework ....................................................................................... 14 2 Cycle Inventory Development and Initial Selection ......................................................... 17 2.1 Economic Consideration ............................................................................................ 18 2.2 Solar Collector/Receiver Consideration ...................................................................... 19 2.3 Previous Level of Effort for Candidate Cycle ............................................................. 19 2.4 Safety and Environmental Consideration .................................................................... 20 3 Formal Cycle Evaluation and Research Prioritization .................................................... 28 4 Cycle Status Summaries and Path Forward Recommendations ..................................... 42 4.1 Sulfur Iodine .............................................................................................................. 42 4.2 Hybrid Sulfur ............................................................................................................. 50 4.3 Photolytic Sulfur Ammonia ........................................................................................ 55 4.4 Zinc Oxide ................................................................................................................. 59 4.5 Cadmium Oxide ......................................................................................................... 64 4.6 Sodium Manganese Cycle .......................................................................................... 71 4.7 Sodium Manganate .................................................................................................... 76 4.8 ALD Ferrite ............................................................................................................... 77 4.9 Hybrid Copper Chloride ............................................................................................. 80 5 Summary Remarks ........................................................................................................... 84 5.1 General Observations ................................................................................................. 84 5.2 Evaluation Outcomes ................................................................................................. 85 5.2.1 Sulfur Iodine ........................................................................................................ 86 5.2.2 Hybrid Sulfur ....................................................................................................... 86 5.2.3 Photolytic Sulfur Ammonia .................................................................................. 87 5.2.4 Zinc Oxide ........................................................................................................... 87 5.2.5 Cadmium Oxide ................................................................................................... 87 5.2.6 Sodium Manganese .............................................................................................. 88 5.2.7 Sodium Manganate .............................................................................................. 88 5.2.8 ALD Ferrite ......................................................................................................... 89 5.2.9 Hybrid Copper Chloride ....................................................................................... 89 Appendix A: Cycle Inventory Changes after the Evaluation ................................................ 98 Appendix B: Criteria Scores Established for the Four Solar Technologies ........................ 100 5 Figures Figure 1.1. Thermochemical cycle class examples. .................................................................. 13 Figure 4.1.1. Sulfur Iodine three-step cycle. ............................................................................ 42 Figure 4.1.2. Bayonet decomposition reactor designed by Sandia National Laboratories. ......... 43 Figure 4.1.3. Bayonet decomposition reactor manifold designed by Sandia National Laboratories. ........................................................................................................ 44 Figure 4.1.4. Schematic solar interface with the solid particle receiver with intermediate heat exchanger providing heated He gas to drive the decomposition reactor. ........ 45 Figure 4.1.5. Bunsen reaction flowsheet (section 1). ...............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Solar Metal Sulfate-Ammonia Based Thermochemical Water Splitting Cycle for Hydrogen Production
    University of Central Florida STARS UCF Patents Technology Transfer 4-8-2014 Solar metal sulfate-ammonia based thermochemical water splitting cycle for hydrogen production. Cunping Huang University of Central Florida Nazim Muradov University of Central Florida Ali Raissi University of Central Florida Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/patents University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Patent is brought to you for free and open access by the Technology Transfer at STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in UCF Patents by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Huang, Cunping; Muradov, Nazim; and Raissi, Ali, "Solar metal sulfate-ammonia based thermochemical water splitting cycle for hydrogen production." (2014). UCF Patents. 525. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/patents/525 I lllll llllllll Ill lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll 111111111111111111111111111111111 US008691068B 1 c12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,691,068 Bl Huang et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Apr. 8, 2014 (54) SOLAR METAL SULFATE-AMMONIA BASED 3,882,222 A * 5/1975 Deschamps et al. .......... 423/575 THERMOCHEMICAL WATER SPLITTING (Continued) CYCLE FOR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION (75) Inventors: Cunping Huang, Cocoa, FL (US); Ali FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS T-Raissi, Melbourne, FL (US); Nazim GB 1486140 * 9/1977 Muradov, Melbourne, FL (US) OTHER PUBLICATIONS (73) Assignee: University of Central Florida Research Foundation, Inc., Orlando, FL (US) Licht, Solar Water Splitting to Generate Hydrogen Fuel: Photothermal Electrochemical Analysis, Journal of Physical Chem­ ( *) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term ofthis istry B, 2003, vol. 107, pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Production by Direct Contact Pyrolysis
    HYDROGEN CYCLE EMPLOYING Thermochemical Considerations for the UT-3 Cycle CALCIUM-BROMINE AND ELECTROLYSIS The significant aspects of the thermodynamic operation of the Richard D. Doctor,1 Christopher L. Marshall,2 UT-3 cycle can be discussed with reasonable assurance. The and David C. Wade3 developers of the UT-3 process have observed that in this series of 4 reactions, the “…hydrolysis of CaBr2 is the slowest reaction.” 1Energy Systems Division 2Chemical Technology Division [1] Water splitting with HBr formation (730ºC; solid-gas; 3 Reactor Analysis and Engineering Division UGT = +50.34 kcal/gm-mole): Argonne National Laboratory 9700 South Cass Ave. CaBr2 + H2O JCaO + 2HBr [Eqn. 1] Argonne, IL 60439 Hence, there is the greatest uncertainty about the practicality of this Introduction cycle because of this reaction. The Secure Transportable Autonomous Reactor (STAR) project is [2] Oxygen formation occurs in an exothermic reaction (550ºC; part of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Nuclear Energy solid-gas; UGT = -18.56 kcal/gm-mole): Research Initiative (NERI) to develop Generation IV nuclear reactors that will supply high-temperature heat at over 800ºC. The CaO + Br2 JCaBr2 + 0.5O2 [Eqn. 2] NERI project goal is to develop an economical, proliferation- In reviewing this system of reactions, there is a difficulty inherent resistant, sustainable, nuclear-based energy supply system based on in the first and second stages [Eqns. 1 and 2]. This difficulty is a modular-sized fast reactor that is passively safe and cooled with linked to the significant physical change in dimensions as the heavy liquid metal. STAR consists of: calcium cycles between bromide and oxide.
    [Show full text]
  • Low-Temperature, Manganese Oxide-Based, Thermochemical Water Splitting Cycle
    Low-temperature, manganese oxide-based, thermochemical water splitting cycle Bingjun Xu, Yashodhan Bhawe, and Mark E. Davis1 Chemical Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125 Contributed by Mark E. Davis, April 17, 2012 (sent for review April 5, 2012) Thermochemical cycles that split water into stoichiometric amounts advantage of both the low-temperature multistep and high-tem- of hydrogen and oxygen below 1,000 °C, and do not involve toxic perature two-step cycles. Here, we show that more than two or corrosive intermediates, are highly desirable because they can reactions will be necessary to perform themochemical water split- convert heat into chemical energy in the form of hydrogen. We ting below 1,000 °C, and then introduce a new thermochemical report a manganese-based thermochemical cycle with a highest water splitting cycle that involves non-corrosive solids that can operating temperature of 850 °C that is completely recyclable and operate with a maximum temperature of 850 °C. does not involve toxic or corrosive components. The thermochemi- cal cycle utilizes redox reactions of Mn(II)/Mn(III) oxides. The shut- Results and Discussion tling of Naþ into and out of the manganese oxides in the hydrogen Thermodynamic Analysis of Two-Step Thermochemical Cycles Shows and oxygen evolution steps, respectively, provides the key thermo- Temperatures Above 1,000 °C will be Necessary. Consider a thermo- dynamic driving forces and allows for the cycle to be closed at tem- chemical cycle with the following two steps: (i) oxidation of a peratures below 1,000 °C. The production of hydrogen and oxygen metal or metal oxide, referred to as Red, by water to its oxidized is fully reproducible for at least five cycles.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY. a Non-Technical Review
    Hydrogen holds out the promise of a truly sustainable global energy future. As a clean energy carrier that can be produced from any primary energy source, hydrogen used in highly efficient fuel cells could prove to be the answer to our growing concerns about energy security, urban pollution and climate change. This prize surely warrants For more information, contact: THE HYDROGEN ECONOMY the attention and resources currently being UNEP DTIE directed at hydrogen – even if the Energy Branch prospects for widespread 39-43 Quai André Citroën commercialisation of hydrogen in the A non-technical review 75739 Paris Cedex 15, France foreseeable future are uncertain. Tel. : +33 1 44 37 14 50 Fax.: +33 1 44 37 14 74 E-mail: [email protected] www.unep.fr/energy/ ROGRAMME P NVIRONMENT E ATIONS N NITED DTI-0762-PA U Copyright © United Nations Environment Programme, 2006 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. UNEP would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Disclaimer The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a Rate of Entropy Production and Kinetic Implications
    Appendix A Rate of Entropy Production and Kinetic Implications According to the second law of thermodynamics, the entropy of an isolated system can never decrease on a macroscopic scale; it must remain constant when equilib- rium is achieved or increase due to spontaneous processes within the system. The ramifications of entropy production constitute the subject of irreversible thermody- namics. A number of interesting kinetic relations, which are beyond the domain of classical thermodynamics, can be derived by considering the rate of entropy pro- duction in an isolated system. The rate and mechanism of evolution of a system is often of major or of even greater interest in many problems than its equilibrium state, especially in the study of natural processes. The purpose of this Appendix is to develop some of the kinetic relations relating to chemical reaction, diffusion and heat conduction from consideration of the entropy production due to spontaneous processes in an isolated system. A.1 Rate of Entropy Production: Conjugate Flux and Force in Irreversible Processes In order to formally treat an irreversible process within the framework of thermo- dynamics, it is important to identify the force that is conjugate to the observed flux. To this end, let us start with the question: what is the force that drives heat flux by conduction (or heat diffusion) along a temperature gradient? The intuitive answer is: temperature gradient. But the answer is not entirely correct. To find out the exact force that drives diffusive heat flux, let us consider an isolated composite system that is divided into two subsystems, I and II, by a rigid diathermal wall, the subsystems being maintained at different but uniform temperatures of TI and TII, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Metal Oxides Applied to Thermochemical Water-Splitting for Hydrogen Production Using Concentrated Solar Energy
    chemengineering Review Metal Oxides Applied to Thermochemical Water-Splitting for Hydrogen Production Using Concentrated Solar Energy Stéphane Abanades Processes, Materials, and Solar Energy Laboratory, PROMES-CNRS, 7 Rue du Four Solaire, 66120 Font Romeu, France; [email protected]; Tel.: +33-0468307730 Received: 17 May 2019; Accepted: 2 July 2019; Published: 4 July 2019 Abstract: Solar thermochemical processes have the potential to efficiently convert high-temperature solar heat into storable and transportable chemical fuels such as hydrogen. In such processes, the thermal energy required for the endothermic reaction is supplied by concentrated solar energy and the hydrogen production routes differ as a function of the feedstock resource. While hydrogen production should still rely on carbonaceous feedstocks in a transition period, thermochemical water-splitting using metal oxide redox reactions is considered to date as one of the most attractive methods in the long-term to produce renewable H2 for direct use in fuel cells or further conversion to synthetic liquid hydrocarbon fuels. The two-step redox cycles generally consist of the endothermic solar thermal reduction of a metal oxide releasing oxygen with concentrated solar energy used as the high-temperature heat source for providing reaction enthalpy; and the exothermic oxidation of the reduced oxide with H2O to generate H2. This approach requires the development of redox-active and thermally-stable oxide materials able to split water with both high fuel productivities and chemical conversion rates. The main relevant two-step metal oxide systems are commonly based on volatile (ZnO/Zn, SnO2/SnO) and non-volatile redox pairs (Fe3O4/FeO, ferrites, CeO2/CeO2 δ, perovskites).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Progress in Thermochemical Water Splitting with the Cu-Cl Cycle For
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Memorial University Research Repository Progress in Thermochemical Water Splitting with the Cu-Cl Cycle for Hydrogen Production G. F. Naterer1*, S. Suppiah2, M. A. Rosen3, K. Gabriel4, I. Dincer5, O. Jianu6, Z. Wang7, E. B. Easton8, B. M. Ikeda9, G. Rizvi10, I. Pioro11, K. Pope12, J. Mostaghimi13, S. Lvov14 1, 12 Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada 2 Canadian Nuclear Laboratories, Chalk River, Ontario, Canada 3-6, 8-11 University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT), Oshawa, Ontario, Canada 7 Xiamen University, Xiamen City, Fujian Province, China 13 University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada 14 Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, U.S. Abstract This paper presents recent advances by an international team of five countries – Canada, U.S., China, Slovenia and Romania – on the development and scale-up of the copper chlorine (Cu-Cl) cycle for thermochemical hydrogen production using nuclear or solar energy. Electrochemical cell analysis and membrane characterization for the CuCl/HCl electrolysis process are presented. Constituent solubility in the ternary CuCl/HCl/H2O system and XRD measurements are reported in regards to the CuCl2 crystallization process. Materials corrosion in high temperature copper chloride salts and performance of coatings of reactor surface alloys are examined. Finally, system integration is examined, with respect to scale-up of unit operations, cascaded heat pumps for heat upgrading, and linkage of heat exchangers with solar and nuclear plants. 1* Corresponding Author: Professor and Dean, Faculty of Engineering and Applied Science, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimization of the Hybrid Sulfur Cycle for Nuclear Hydrogen Production Using Unisim Design
    Transactions of the Korean Nuclear Society Spring Meeting Jeju, Korea, May 22, 2009 Optimization of the Hybrid Sulfur Cycle for Nuclear Hydrogen Production Using UniSim Design Yong Hun Jung a∗, Yong Hoon Jeong a aKAIST, 335 Gwahangno, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Korea *Corresponding author: [email protected] 1. Introduction 2. Simulation The sulfur-based thermochemical cycles are A simple Hybrid Sulfur Cycle flow sheet was considered as the most promising methods to produce developed and described on the UniSim Design as hydrogen. The Hybrid Sulfur (HyS) Cycle is a mixed shown in Fig. 2. PR-Twu equation of state model is thermochemical cycle with the sulfur-aided electrolysis selected among the fluid packages provided by basis as depicted in the Fig. 1. Hydrogen is produced from environment of UniSim Design [3]. Electrolyzer unit is water by oxidizing sulfur dioxide in the low not described. Instead, the experimental data of the temperature electrolysis step and the sulfuric acid which required electrode potentials for the various acid is also produced in the electrolyzer proceeds to the high concentrations is inputted in the linked spread sheet of temperature thermochemical step. The sulfuric acid is the UniSim Design [2]. The thermochemical step: the concentrated in the concentrator first and then cycle except the electrolyzer is adjusted to produce decomposed into steam and sulfur trioxide, which is 1kgmole/h of sulfur dioxide and this is equivalent to further decomposed into sulfur dioxide and oxygen at 1kgmole/h of hydrogen from the whole cycle assuming high temperature (;1100 K) in the decomposer. After that all the sulfur dioxide are consumed in the separated with oxygen in the separator, the sulfur electrolyzer.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Sulfur (Westinghouse) V0.Pub
    IEA/HIA TASK 25 : HIGH TEMPERATURE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION PROCESS Hybrid Sulfur cycle Process principle H2 ½ O2 H2 + H2SO4 ½ O2 (1) 2 H2O + SO2 —> H2SO4 + H2 S + H SO (2) SO2 (2a) H2SO4 —> H2O + SO3 (1) Circulation 2 4 2 H2O + SO2 + 2 H O (2b) SO —> SO + ½ O Electrolysis 80°C 2 3 2 2 850°CH2O Heat H2O Electrical Energy Current status : Hybrid Sulfur The Hybrid Sulfur (Westinghouse) Cycle is a Process description : two-step thermochemical cycle for decomposing (1) SO electrolysis at 80° C water into hydrogen and oxygen. Sulfur oxides 2 (2) H2SO4 decomposition : (2a) Starts at 450° C serve as recycled intermediates within the system. (2b) Starts at 800° C • Significant research activity for nuclear Heat source : and solar. Nuclear or Solar heat source • Chemical reactions all demonstrated. Materials : Electrodes : carbon-supported platinum catalysts Advantages : H2SO4 Decomposition : Ceramics such as silicon • Uses common / inexpensive chemicals. carbide, silicon nitride and cermets • Cycle has the potential for achieving high thermal efficiencies. Efficiency : • Only one intermediary species (oxides of The cycle efficiency is 42 % which has the potential sulfur). to be increased to 48.8 % 1. Challenges : Cost evaluation : • Requires high temperature. Between 4.4 and 6.8 $/kg for a nuclear heat source12 • Corrosion by H SO . 2 4 Between 1.6 and 5.6 €/kg for a solar heat source13,14 Version 1 1 IEA/HIA TASK 25: HIGH TEMPERATURE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION PROCESS Flow-sheet The Hybrid Sulphur cycle, also named Ispra Mark 11 cycle or Westinghouse Sulphur cycle was developed in the 70’s by Westinghouse Electric corporation.
    [Show full text]
  • HYDROGEN for HEATING: ATMOSPHERIC IMPACTS a Literature Review
    HYDROGEN FOR HEATING: ATMOSPHERIC IMPACTS A literature review BEIS Research Paper Number 2018: no. 21 November 2018 7th October 2018 HYDROGEN FOR HEATING: ATMOSPHERIC IMPACTS – A LITERATURE REVIEW R.G. (Dick) Derwent OBE rdscientific, Newbury The preparation of this review and assessment was supported by the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy under Purchase Order No. 13070002913. BEIS Research Paper No. 21 1 HYDROGEN FOR HEATING: ATMOSPHERIC IMPACTS – A LITERATURE REVIEW Summary Introduction The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) is undertaking work to strengthen the evidence base on the potential long-term approaches for decarbonising heating. One approach being explored is whether hydrogen could be used in place of natural gas in the gas grid to provide a source of low-carbon heat in the future. BEIS commissioned rdscientific to carry out a literature review to assess the evidence on the potential atmospheric impacts of increased emissions to the atmosphere of hydrogen. Headline Findings This review summarises the present state of our understanding of the potential global atmospheric impacts of any future increased use of hydrogen through release of additional hydrogen into the atmosphere. This review has identified two global atmospheric dis- benefits from a future hydrogen economy: stratospheric ozone depletion through its moistening of the stratosphere, and contribution to climate change through increasing the growth rates of methane and tropospheric ozone. • The consensus from the limited number of studies using current stratospheric ozone models is that the impacts of hydrogen on the stratospheric ozone layer are small. • The best estimate of the carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalence of hydrogen is 4.3 megatonnes of carbon dioxide per 1 megatonne emission of hydrogen over a 100- year time horizon, the plausible range 0 – 9.8 expresses 95% confidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Click to Add Title SOL2HY2 Solar to Hydrogen Hybrid Cycles
    SOL2HY2 Solar To Hydrogen Hybrid Cycles Michael Gasik Aalto University Foundation sol2hy2.eucoord.com Coordinator email: [email protected] to add title Programme Review Days 2016 Brussels, 21-22 November PROJECT OVERVIEW Project Information Call topic SP1-JTI-FCH.2012.2.5 – Thermo-electrical- chemical processes with solar heat sources Grant agreement number 325320 Application area (FP7) Hydrogen Production Start date 01/06/2013 End date 30/11/2016 Total budget (€) 3,701,300 FCH JU contribution (€) 1,991,115 Other contribution (€, source) 214,000 (Tekes, FI) Stage of implementation 99% project months elapsed vs total project duration, at date of November 1, 2016 Partners Enginsoft (IT), Aalto (FI), ENEA (IT), DLR (DE), Outotec (FI), Erbicol (CH), Woikoski (FI) PROJECT SUMMARY • The project focuses on applied R&D and demo of the relevant-scale key components of the solar-powered, CO2-free hybrid water splitting cycles, complemented by their advanced modeling and process simulation and site-specific optimization • Solar-powered thermo-chemical cycles are capable to directly transfer concentrated sunlight into chemical energy. Of these, hybrid-sulfur (HyS) cycle was identified as the most promising, but its challenges remain in materials and the whole flowsheet optimization, tailored to specific solar input and plant site location. • In the project, consortium developed solutions for the SO2-depolarized electrolyser, sulfuric acid handling and for the BoP. • The on-Sun demo has proven the said concepts and a new software tool were created, allowing the tailoring of such flexible plant at any worldwide location, leading to H2 plants and technology “green concepts” commercialization.
    [Show full text]
  • SO2 - an Indirect Source of Energy
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Dec 15, 2017 SO2 - An indirect source of energy Kriek, R.J.; Van Ravenswaay, J.P.; Potgieter, M.; Calitz, A.; Lates, V.; Björketun, Mårten; Siahrostami, Samira; Rossmeisl, Jan Published in: Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Journal Publication date: 2013 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Kriek, R. J., Van Ravenswaay, J. P., Potgieter, M., Calitz, A., Lates, V., Björketun, M., ... Rossmeisl, J. (2013). SO2 - An indirect source of energy. Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Journal, 113(8), 593- 604. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. SO2 – an indirect source of energy by R.J. Kriek*, J.P. van Ravenswaay*, M. Potgieter*, A. Calitz*, V. Lates*, M.E. Björketun†, S. Siahrostami†, and J. Rossmeisl† Around the mid-1970s SO2 emissions peaked, subsequently declining as a direct Synopsis result of the implementation of focused abatement technologies.
    [Show full text]