Letter of Intent First Draft
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Geological Parks, Eco-Tourism and Sustainable Development
3rd International Conference on Management Science and Management Innovation (MSMI 2016) Geological Parks, Eco-tourism and Sustainable Development Jian-Xinog Qin Institute of Regional Geography &Tourism Development, Southwest University for Nationalities, Chengdu, China E-mail: [email protected] Abstract—Based on the comparative analysis of the definition From the definition we can see, both in function and of geological parks, ecological tourism and sustainable purpose is consistent, and emphasize the following three development, this paper discusses the dialectical relationship binding: combination of local economic development and between the geological parks, ecological tourism and the protection of natural and cultural ecological system; sustainable development. The geological park is an important appreciate the nature and know the combination of nature; part of the ecological tourism resources, and the geological protection ecological environment and widespread public park is an important place and an ideal place for the awareness of protection combined. development of eco-tourism. Geological park and ecological tourism development has a similar goal system, development II. THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE characteristics, development principles and contents. GEOLOGICAL PARK AND ECOLOGICAL TOURISM Geological park is an important part of the theory of sustainable development, is the embodiment of sustainable A. Geological relic resource is an important part of the tourism. The tourism development of geopark is a concrete ecological -
2005 08 26 Department of Environment and Conservation
2005 08 26 Department of Environment and Conservation Environmental Assessment Division ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT BULLETIN Environment and Conservation Minister Tom Osborne has announced the following event relative to Part 10 Environmental Assessment of the Environmental Protection Act. UNDERTAKING RELEASED: Port aux Basques to Belle Isle (Appalachian) Hiking Trail (Reg. 1194) Proponent: International Appalachian Trail NL Chapter Inc. The Minister has released the Appalachian Hiking Trail from further environmental assessment review subject to the following conditions: • The attached overview map (titled: Amended July 2005) will be the final route for the Appalachian Trail. • The following trail routings must be implemented: • Cape John (Cape Anguille) - the existing Cormack Trail (located along the coast) must be used. • Highlands of St. John - the alternate route shown on maps 15(I & III) must be used instead of maps 15(A-C). • Cloud River - the alternate route shown on map 15(II) has a four kilometre section moved to the north. • Mare Cove - the route shown on map 16(A) is not to be used. • The Parks and Natural Areas Division and the Wildlife Division must be consulted prior to final route selection and trail construction through: The Arches Provincial Park; Sir Richard Squires Memorial Provincial Park; Main River Canadian Heritage River Waterway Park; Table Mountain International Biological Program Site; and, the Serpentine Lake / Lewis Hills Public Reserve areas. • The Wildlife Division must be consulted prior to trail construction through Newfoundland pine marten critical habitat, areas with endangered rare plants, and caribou calving grounds. • Gender equity provisions be included when tendering contracts and advertising positions, and gender equity be considered when awarding contracts and hiring workers. -
Malaysia National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan2)
MALAYSIA NATIONAL PLAN OF ACTION FOR THE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF SHARK (PLAN2) DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND AGRO-BASED INDUSTRY MALAYSIA 2014 First Printing, 2014 Copyright Department of Fisheries Malaysia, 2014 All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the Department of Fisheries Malaysia. Published in Malaysia by Department of Fisheries Malaysia Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry Malaysia, Level 1-6, Wisma Tani Lot 4G2, Precinct 4, 62628 Putrajaya Malaysia Telephone No. : 603 88704000 Fax No. : 603 88891233 E-mail : [email protected] Website : http://dof.gov.my Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data ISBN 978-983-9819-99-1 This publication should be cited as follows: Department of Fisheries Malaysia, 2014. Malaysia National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan 2), Ministry of Agriculture and Agro- based Industry Malaysia, Putrajaya, Malaysia. 50pp SUMMARY Malaysia has been very supportive of the International Plan of Action for Sharks (IPOA-SHARKS) developed by FAO that is to be implemented voluntarily by countries concerned. This led to the development of Malaysia’s own National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark or NPOA-Shark (Plan 1) in 2006. The successful development of Malaysia’s second National Plan of Action for the Conservation and Management of Shark (Plan 2) is a manifestation of her renewed commitment to the continuous improvement of shark conservation and management measures in Malaysia. -
Regional Asset Mapping Initiative. Report Appendices
\ Regional Asset Mapping Initiative Report Appendices May 2014 PREPARED FOR: PAUL P ARSONS - ACOA Prepared by: Erika Parill, Kyle White, Dr. Kelly Vodden, Dr. Jacqui Walsh, Dr. Greg Wood-Grenfell Campus, Memorial University Table of Contents Appendix 1 - Coding Guidelines .................................................................................... 3 Appendix 2A – Southern Labrador Asset Summary ....................................................... 9 Appendix 2B-Southern Labrador Asset Inventory ....................................................... 14 Appendix 3A-Humber-White Bay Asset Summary ...................................................... 44 Appendix 3B - Humber-White Bay Asset Inventory ..................................................... 49 Appendix 4A-Greater St. Anthony Area Asset Summary ........................................... 157 Appendix 4B - Greater St. Anthony Area Asset Inventory ......................................... 162 Appendix 5A-Gros Morne-Plum Point Asset Summary ............................................. 206 Appendix 5B- Gros Morne-Plum Point Asset Inventory ............................................ 211 Appendix 1 - Coding Guidelines1 Built Category Detailed Code (NAICS if applicable) Transportation Infrastructure air transportation (481) rail transportation (482) water transportation (483) /port and wharf facilities trucking transportation (484) transit and ground passenger transit (485) roads General Facilities pipelines (486) hydroelectric facilities sporting facilities community centre -
(STAR Humber-Bay of Islands) Final Report October 2019
Strategic Regional Tourism Plan City of Corner Brook, Bay of Islands and Lower Humber Region (STAR Humber-Bay of Islands) Final Report October 2019 COMMITTEE MEMBERS Co-Chairs • Stelman Flynn, Marble Zip Tours • Craig Borden, Rugged Edge Core Committee Members • Annette George, City of Corner Brook • Glenda Simms, City of Corner Brook • Allan Kendall, Appalachian Chalets + RV’s • Robert Murphy, Legion/Ambassadors • Nora Fever, Corner Brook Port Authority • Richard Wells, Marble Mountain • Darren Martin, Marblewood Inn/Yield Communications • Rob Thomas, Saltbox Restaurant • Laura Watton, Humber Valley Resort • Darren Park, Four Season Tours • Tara Saunders, Qalipu Nation • Lexie McKenzie, Go Western Ex-Offico • Mark Tierney, ACOA • Paul Taylor, TCII Study Team: Tract Consulting • Neil Dawe • Corrina Dawe • Kevin Clarke • Mike Stolte TABLE OF CONTENTS Project Purpose and Process ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Environmental Scan ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Our Region ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Our Tourism Sector ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. -
Western Newfoundland Forest – Serpentine Range Subregion
ECOREGION Forest Barren Tundra Western Newfoundland Forest Bog Serpentine Range subregion NF 1 ne of the largest Hills area. While the entire Western Newfoundland 1 Oecoregions on the island Forest ecoregion ranges from very hilly to 2 of Newfoundland, the mountainous, the Serpentine Range subregion is at a Western Newfoundland the mountainous end of the spectrum. In fact, the Forest includes more than Lewis Hills boast the highest peak on the Island at 810 one million hectares in the metres above sea level, while the barren mountain 3 western portion of the Island. It stretches from the tops of the Tablelands and Blow Me Down Mountains Codroy Valley in the south to Bonne Bay in the north are visible when looking westward from Corner Brook. and extends from the west coast inland, including 4 much of the Long Range Mountains. The steepness with which the mountains of Its neighbouring ecoregions are the Maritime the Serpentine Range rise from the surrounding Barrens to the south, the Long Range Barrens and terrain results in talus in many areas. Other unusual 5 Central Newfoundland Forest to the east, and the geographic formations, such as solifluction terraces Northern Peninsula Forest and Long Range Barrens and stone polygons, are formed along some of these to the north. Local variation in the geology of the slopes. 6 Western Newfoundland Forest ecoregion has This subregion is also characterized by an affected its geography and biology, and has abundance of serpentine rock in its mountains and led to this ecoregion being divided into six plateaus, which in turn contributes to conditions that 7 subregions. -
The George Wright Forum
The George Wright Forum The GWS Journal of Parks, Protected Areas & Cultural Sites volume 27 number 1 • 2010 Origins Founded in 1980, the George Wright Society is organized for the pur poses of promoting the application of knowledge, fostering communica tion, improving resource management, and providing information to improve public understanding and appreciation of the basic purposes of natural and cultural parks and equivalent reserves. The Society is dedicat ed to the protection, preservation, and management of cultural and natural parks and reserves through research and education. Mission The George Wright Society advances the scientific and heritage values of parks and protected areas. The Society promotes professional research and resource stewardship across natural and cultural disciplines, provides avenues of communication, and encourages public policies that embrace these values. Our Goal The Society strives to he the premier organization connecting people, places, knowledge, and ideas to foster excellence in natural and cultural resource management, research, protection, and interpretation in parks and equivalent reserves. Board of Directors ROLF DIA.MANT, President • Woodstock, Vermont STEPHANIE T(K)"1'1IMAN, Vice President • Seattle, Washington DAVID GKXW.R, Secretary * Three Rivers, California JOHN WAITHAKA, Treasurer * Ottawa, Ontario BRAD BARR • Woods Hole, Massachusetts MELIA LANE-KAMAHELE • Honolulu, Hawaii SUZANNE LEWIS • Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming BRENT A. MITCHELL • Ipswich, Massachusetts FRANK J. PRIZNAR • Gaithershnrg, Maryland JAN W. VAN WAGTENDONK • El Portal, California ROBERT A. WINFREE • Anchorage, Alaska Graduate Student Representative to the Board REBECCA E. STANFIELD MCCOWN • Burlington, Vermont Executive Office DAVID HARMON,Executive Director EMILY DEKKER-FIALA, Conference Coordinator P. O. Box 65 • Hancock, Michigan 49930-0065 USA 1-906-487-9722 • infoldgeorgewright.org • www.georgewright.org Tfie George Wright Forum REBECCA CONARD & DAVID HARMON, Editors © 2010 The George Wright Society, Inc. -
CBRC Virtual Spring Opener – Results
Corner Brook Running Club Spring Opener 5k - RESULTS First Name Last Name City Location Time Megan Adams Massey drive Outdoors - Road 20:25 Christine Adey Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 31:13 Wayne Allen Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 30.02 Rosie Allen Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 30.02 Paige Allen Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 30.02 Vicki Anderson Massey Drive Outdoors - Trail 24 mins Derek Anderson Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 22:34 Angela Aultman Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 42:01 Jill Austin Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 29:29 Amanda Baker Deer lake Treadmill 31:28 Tanya Baker Deer Lake Treadmill 48:50 Laura Barry Corner Brook Treadmill 34:24 Jackie Bauman Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 25:00 Naomi Bose Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 22:39 Leila Brinston Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 31:00 Tim Budgell Humber Valley Resort Outdoors - Road 22:37 Cole Burden Steady Brook Treadmill 20:11 Trent Burden Steady Brook Outdoors - Road 19:36 Maci Burton Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 39:11 Brian Butt Massey Drive Outdoors - Road 37:30 Sam Byrne Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 25:50 Jon Chow Corner brook Outdoors - Road 29:10 Terri-Lyn Coade Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 31:41 William Coade Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 30:00 Edward Cobb Middle Sackville Outdoors - Road 29:23 Juliette Colbourne Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 28:59 Melissa Cormier Doyles Outdoors - Road 25:53 Emily Cowan Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 24:28 David Critch Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 24:30 Arlene Curtis Corner Brook Outdoors - Road 29:20 Catherine Cutler Ramea Outdoors - Road 27:02 Roslynn -
An Exploration of Environmental Values in the Asian, Developing
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 8-2016 An Exploration of Environmental Values in the Asian, Developing-World Context of Dong Van Karst Plateau Global Geopark, Vietnam Madeline Duda Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Recommended Citation Duda, Madeline, "An Exploration of Environmental Values in the Asian, Developing-World Context of Dong Van Karst Plateau Global Geopark, Vietnam" (2016). All Theses. 2475. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/2475 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN EXPLORATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES IN THE ASIAN, DEVELOPING-WORLD CONTEXT OF DONG VAN KARST PLATEAU GLOBAL GEOPARK, VIETNAM A Thesis Presented to the Graduate School of Clemson University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Parks, Recreation, and Tourism Management by Madeline Duda August 2016 Accepted by: Robert B. Powell, Committee Chair Jeffrey C. Hallo Brett A. Wright ABSTRACT It has been generally assumed that individuals’ environmental values are influenced by culture, experiences, social norms, economic standing, among others. However, to date research on held environmental values has focused primarily on the developed world context. To address this gap, this research explores the environmental values of -
Frequently Asked Questions About UNESCO Global Geoparks – General Information, Definitions, Governance and Framing Issues
FAQs general public Frequently asked questions about UNESCO Global Geoparks – General information, definitions, governance and framing issues What is a UNESCO Global Geopark? • Definition • What are the aims of a UNESCO Global Geopark? • What are the essential factors to be considered before creating a UNESCO Global Geopark? • How are UNESCO Global Geoparks established and managed? • Has a UNESCO Global Geopark a required minimum or a maximum size? • Is a UNESCO Global Geopark a new category of protected area? • Is there a limited number of UNESCO Global Geoparks within any one country? • What are typical activities within a UNESCO Global Geopark? • Do UNESCO Global Geoparks do scientific research? • What does community involvement and empowerment entail in a UNESCO Global Geopark? • How does a YNESCO Global Geopark deal with natural resources? • Can industrial activities and construction projects take place in a UNESCO Global Geopark? • Is the selling of any original geological material (e.g. rocks, minerals, and fossils) permitted within a UNESCO Global Geopark? • What to do if a National Geoparks Network exists in a country? • What is the Global Geoparks Network? UNESCO Global Geoparks among UNESCO designations and the role of UNESCO • What is the difference between UNESCO Global Geoparks, Biosphere Reserves and World Heritage Sites? • What is the role of UNESCO? • Does UNESCO provide training courses? What is a UNESCO Global Geopark? • Definition UNESCO Global Geoparks are single, unified geographical areas where sites and landscapes of international geological significance are managed with a holistic concept of protection, education and sustainable development. A UNESCO Global Geopark comprises a number of geological heritage sites of special scientific importance, rarity or beauty. -
Izu Peninsula Geopark Promotion Council
Contents A. Identification of the Area ........................................................................................................................................................... 1 A.1 Name of the Proposed Geopark ........................................................................................................................................... 1 A.2 Location of the Proposed Geopark ....................................................................................................................................... 1 A.3 Surface Area, Physical and Human Geographical Characteristics ....................................................................................... 1 A.3.1 Physical Geographical Characteristics .......................................................................................................................... 1 A.3.2 Human Geographical Charactersitics ........................................................................................................................... 3 A.4 Organization in charge and Management Structure ............................................................................................................. 5 A.4.1 Izu Peninsula Geopark Promotion Council ................................................................................................................... 5 A.4.2 Structure of the Management Organization .................................................................................................................. 6 A.4.3 Supporting Units/ Members -
Humber Valley Regional Planning Advisory Authority
Humber Valley Regional Planning Advisory Authority Annual Report 2010 – 2011 Page 2 Table of Contents Chairperson’s Message .......................................................................... Page 3 Section 1.0 Overview ...................................................................... Page 4 Section 2.0 Mandate ....................................................................... Page 7 Section 3.0 Values .......................................................................... Page 8 Section 4.0 Primary Clients .............................................................. Page 9 Section 5.0 Vision ........................................................................... Page 10 Section 6.0 Mission ........................................................................ Page 11 Section 7.0 Activities ....................................................................... Page 12 Section 8.0 Summary Statement ...................................................... Page 15 Humber Valley Regional Planning Advisory Authority Annual Report 2010 - 2011 Page 3 Message from the Chairperson I am delighted to present the 2010/2011 Annual Report for the Humber Valley Regional Planning Advisory Authority as per the requirements of the Transparency and Accountability Act. The Humber Valley Regional Planning Advisory Authority is a Category 3 government entity appointed by the Minister of Municipal Affairs, in accordance with Section (9) of the Urban and Rural Planning Act, 2000. Members of the Regional Planning Advisory Authority