Habitat-Capability Model for Brown Bear in Southeastern Northeast Portion of Chichagof Island Were Illegal

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Habitat-Capability Model for Brown Bear in Southeastern Northeast Portion of Chichagof Island Were Illegal HABITAT-CAPABILITYMODEL FOR BROWN BEAR IN SOUTHEASTALASKA JOHNW. SCHOEN,Alaska Departmentof Fish and Game, 333 RaspberryRoad, Anchorage, AK 99518 RODNEYW. FLYNN,Alaska Departmentof Fish and Game, P.O. Box 20, Douglas, AK 99824 LOWELLH. SURING,1Alaska Region, U.S. Departmentof AgricultureForest Service, P.O. Box 21628, Juneau, AK 99802 KIMBERLYTITUS, Alaska Departmentof Fish and Game, P.O. Box 20, Douglas, AK 99824 LAVERNR. BEIER,Alaska Departmentof Fish and Game, P.O. Box 20, Douglas, AK 99824 Abstract: Habitat-capabilitymodels are necessary for evaluating the effects of forest management on the management of indicator species (including brown bears [Ursus arctos]) of the Tongass National Forest. Habitat-usedata from 95 radio-collaredbrown bears on Admiralty and Chichagof Islands were used to develop this habitat-capabilitymodel. Each of 20 habitatswas assigned a habitat-capabilityvalue based on bear habitatpreference or best professionaljudgment. The effects of human activity and resourcedevelopment on brown bears were estimated, based on best professional judgment, as reductions in habitatcapability within zones of human influence. Int. Conf. Bear Res. and Manage.9(1):327-337 Once widely distributedacross western North the last 2 decades(see review in Zager and Jonkel America,brown/grizzly bears (Ursus arctos horribilis) 1983, Contrerasand Evans 1986), and several currentlyrange over a significantlyreduced portion of investigationshave recently been completed in the the continent. In 1975, they were declaredthreatened coastalforests of BritishColumbia and Alaska (e.g., in the UnitedStates south of Canada. Loss of habitat Hamilton1987, Schoenand Beier 1990). The brown to humanencroachment is a seriousproblem for bear bear has been selected as a managementindicator managementin the contiguous48 statesand elsewhere species(MIS) in therevised Tongass Land Management (Mattson1990, McLellan1990, Schoen1990, Servheen Plan(U.S. Dep. of Agric. For. Serv. 1991). Habitat- 1990). Throughoutthe world,the futureof manybear capabilitymodels are needed for each MIS on the populations,including brown bears, is inextricably TongassForest. Thesemodels will be used for project- linkedwith forestmanagement (Schoen 1991). level planning and are necessary for providing In North Americatoday, the largestpopulation of informationto evaluatethe cumulativeeffects of forest brownbears occurs in Alaska(Peek et al. 1987) with managementon wildlife habitats and populations. an estimated30,000-40,000 bears (Alaska Department Cumulativeeffects analysis is a relativelynew but of Fish andGame 1978). Brownbears are indigenous importantcomponent of forest planning(Christensen to SoutheastAlaska where they occur throughoutthe 1986,Weaver et al. 1986)and provides an approachfor mainlandcoast and on the islandsnorth of Frederick predictingthe long-termeffects of land-management Sound. Admiralty,Baranof, and ChichagofIslands activitieson brownbear habitat and populations. The have some of the highestbrown bear densities(e.g., modelto be describedevaluates quality of habitatfor 2.6 bears/km2on northernAdmiralty Island) in the brownbears, which is assumedto be relatedto long- world(Schoen and Beier 1990). term carryingcapacity. Habitatsare rated, using Brownbears are one of the specialfeatures of the habitat-preferencedata from Schoenand Beier(1990), Tongass NationalForest. Admiralty,Baranof, and on the basisof theirvalue to bearsduring late summer ChichagofIslands are one of the mostimportant brown when hyperphagicbears are most concentratedand bearhunting regions in Alaska. Tourismand outdoor vulnerableto humanactivities. recreationare also growing industriesin this area. Thisproject was fundedby the AlaskaDepartment of Visitorsto SoutheastAlaska as well as manyresidents Fish and Game and Alaska FederalAid in Wildlife are interestedin an opportunityto observethe brown RestorationProject W-22-7. Additionalsupport for the bear, a symbolof the Americanwilderness. projectwas providedby the Forest Service and the The declinein the rangeand numbers of brownbears GreensCreek Mine. D. Anderson,S. Herrero,B. duringthe past centuryin the contiguous48 stateshas McLellan, and 2 anonymous referees provided heightenedmanagement concern for the species and constructivecriticism and editorial review of the prompted an increase in brown bear research, manuscript, and L. McManus provided technical particularlyhabitat-related studies. Most researchon editing. bear-forestryrelationships has been conductedwithin 1 Present Address: Chugach National Forest, 3301 C St., #300, Anchorage, AK 99503. 328 Int. Conf.Bear Res. and Manage.9(1) 1994 HABITATRELATIONSHIPS avalancheslopes. During early summer (mid-Jun Odum(1971:234) described habitat as theorganism's throughmid-Jul), most bearsmove to forestedslopes "address"or the place it inhabitsin fulfillingits life and alpine/subalpinemeadows where they forage on needs (e.g., food, cover, water). Harrisand Kangas newlyemergent vegetation. (1988) proposedthat the definitionof primaryhabitat Bearsconcentrate along low-elevation coastal salmon explicitlyextends beyond the individualto includean streams from mid-July through early September. area of sufficientsize or configurationto supporta During this late summerseason, 54% of all bear populationover time. We considerthat an effective relocationsoccurred in riparianforest habitat vegetated definitionof bear habitatmust also incorporatethe by a spruce-devils club (Picea sitchensis-Oplopanax influenceof humanactivities (Schoen 1990). horridus)community (Schoen and Beier 1990). During Thehabitat relationships of brown/grizzlybears vary this sameperiod, 66% of all bearrelocations occurred considerablyacross the diverse array of ecosystems withina 160-mband on eitherside of anadromousfish they inhabitfrom the easternRockies, through coastal streams(Schoen and Beier 1990). Althoughthis zone rainforests, and to the Arctic. The AlaskaDepartment includeda varietyof habitats,it was dominatedby the of Fish and Gamebegan brown bear investigations in riparianspruce-devils club community. Bears used this SoutheastAlaska in 1981 with particularemphasis on habitatfor fishingalong river banks, for foragingon habitatrelationships and the influenceof logging and succulentvegetation and berries,and for securityand mining activitieson bear populations. From 1981 thermalcover. through1988, 68 brownbears were radiocollaredon Althoughmost bears (>85%) are associatedwith northern Admiralty Island and 3,020 relocations anadromousfish streamsin late summer,some bears collected(Schoen and Beier 1990). Habitatuse by (primarilyfemales) do not use coastal fish streams radio-collaredbrown bears varied seasonally(P < (Schoenet al. 1986). Those bears (termed"interior" 0.01) (Table1) andis considereda responseto seasonal bears) remain in interior regions of the island differencesin food availabilityand quality. throughoutthe year, foragingprimarily on vegetation Most brown bears emerge from high-elevation and berriesin subalpineand avalancheslope habitat. (>300 m) dens betweenApril and May. After den By mid-September,most bears move to upperelevation emergence,many bears move to low-elevationold- (>300 m) forests, avalancheslopes, and subalpine growthforests, coastal sedge meadows, or south-facing meadowswhere they feed on currant(Ribes spp.) and devilsclub berries before denning. Table 1. Seasonal habitat use by 68 radio-collared brown Winterdenning begins in Octoberand November. bearsa on Admiralty Island, Southeast Alaska, 1982-88.b Mean elevationand slope of 121 den sites of radio- collaredbears from Admiraltyand ChichagofIslands Percentageof habitatuse were 640 m and 35? (Schoen et al. 1987). Fifty-two Summer percentof those dens occurredin old-growthforest on Habitattype Spring Early Late Fall Annual habitat. Althoughcave denning was common AdmiraltyIsland, many dens were excavatedunder Old-growth forest large-diameterold-growth trees or into the bases of Upland forest 55.9 28.2 24.5 30.6 28.4 largesnags (Schoen et al. 1987). Riparianforest 8.7 11.0 53.6 18.8 33.3 The seasonalfood habitsof Admiraltybrown bears were described Beach fringe 6.8 4.9 2.0 1.5 3.1 by McCarthy(1989). Duringspring, the diet of brownbears is dominatedby sedges(Carex forest 3.7 14.0 5.2 10.3 8.4 Subalpine spp.), other green vegetation, roots, and deer Nonforest (Odocoileus sitkensis). Sedges and salmon Avalanche slopes 12.4 15.7 5.5 23.2 11.3 (Oncorhynchusspp.) are the major foods consumed skunk 3.7 18.9 2.8 7.6 8.4 duringsummer, although cabbage(Lysichiton Alpine americanum),devils club berries, and other plants, Estuary 3.8 4.5 5.3 0.6 4.3 berries,and rootsare also used. Duringfall, salmon, Other 5.0 2.8 1.1 7.4 2.8 devilsclub berries, skunk cabbage, sedge, beach lovage dominatethe n relocations 161 772 1,285 340 2,558 roots(Ligusticum spp.), andcurrants diet. The distributionof bears correspondedclosely to the a Interiorbears were not included. seasonalabundance and quality of the food itemslisted b Schoen and Beier (1990). above. Because bears have relatively inefficient ALASKABROwNBROWN BEAR HABITAT MODEL *? Schoen et al. 329 carnivore digestive systems (Bunnell and Hamilton influence. Nine majorhabitat categories were identified 1983) and are active for only part of the year, they for use in this model: old-growth forest, beach-fringe must exploit the most productivefeeding sites available. old growth, subalpine forest, second-growth forest, This often brings bears into conflict with humansusing clearcuts, avalanche slopes, alpine, estuary,
Recommended publications
  • Striped Skunk Mephitis Mephitis
    Striped Skunk Mephitis mephitis Other common names None Introduction Striped skunks are highly recognizable for their distinctive coloring and their ability to spray an extremely foul smelling substance when they feel threatened. Some folks may also recognize them as the inspiration for the Looney Tunes character Pepé le Pew. There are 11 different species in the skunk family, with 5 species residing throughout the United States, but only the striped skunk can be found in New York. Physical Description and Anatomy Striped skunks are about the size of an average domestic cat. Adults can Pepé le Pew weigh anywhere between 2 – 12 lbs (0.9 – 5.4 kg), and are 18 – 32 inches (45.7 – 81.3 cm) long, with the tail making up 7 – 11 inches (17.8 – 27.9 cm) of that length. They have a stout body, short legs, and a long, bushy tail. Each foot is equipped with five strong claws that are used for digging. The bold striping pattern of the glossy black and white fur is highly variable. This coloration is designed to serve as a warning to other species not to bother it, or they will suffer the consequences. Generally, the top of the head is white, which splits into two stripes of white down the back, divided by a stripe of black. The lower parts are black as well. Variations may result in individuals that are all white above and all black below, some other combination of stripes and patches, or almost solid white or black. Skunks have such bold coloration because they Picture showing variation in color patterns of striped skunk.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Fur Harvester Digest 3 SEASON DATES and BAG LIMITS
    2021 Michigan Fur Harvester Digest RAP (Report All Poaching): Call or Text (800) 292-7800 Michigan.gov/Trapping Table of Contents Furbearer Management ...................................................................3 Season Dates and Bag Limits ..........................................................4 License Types and Fees ....................................................................6 License Types and Fees by Age .......................................................6 Purchasing a License .......................................................................6 Apprentice & Youth Hunting .............................................................9 Fur Harvester License .....................................................................10 Kill Tags, Registration, and Incidental Catch .................................11 When and Where to Hunt/Trap ...................................................... 14 Hunting Hours and Zone Boundaries .............................................14 Hunting and Trapping on Public Land ............................................18 Safety Zones, Right-of-Ways, Waterways .......................................20 Hunting and Trapping on Private Land ...........................................20 Equipment and Fur Harvester Rules ............................................. 21 Use of Bait When Hunting and Trapping ........................................21 Hunting with Dogs ...........................................................................21 Equipment Regulations ...................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Black Bears in New York State
    eavy-set, formidable-looking animals, wild black bears are one of New York State’s largest land mammals. Though frequently thought of as aggressive and menacing, they are ordinarily very shy, elusive, secretive creatures. In fact, although common in most of the state, black bears try to avoid people and so are seldom seen by many. DESCRIPTION FOOD AND FAMILY LIFE Native to North America, black bears (Ursus americanus) New York’s largest carnivore, black bears are primarily occur in Alaska, Canada, northern Mexico and most of the vegetarians, eating an amazing amount of small items such lower forty-eight states. They prefer wooded areas, occurring as succulent plants (like skunk cabbage), grasses, sedges, in and around mature forests. Black bears also do well in clover, insects (especially ants and bees), berries, fruits, somewhat open and developed areas as long as adequate nuts, mast (acorns and beechnuts), and plant roots. cover and an abundance of food are available. They are However, bears are opportunists and will eat whatever is intelligent and curious and spend a great deal of time readily available, including amphibians, reptiles, small exploring for food. Solitary animals, they usually live alone, mammals, fish, carrion and garbage. In addition, they will except for females with cubs and in feeding areas with an also avail themselves of human foods (almost everything abundance of food. Adult bears have large home ranges, from barbecued chicken to freeze dried meals and trail with males traveling up to 100 square miles, and females mix), bird seed (especially sunflower seeds), suet, pet food, traveling 25 to 50 square miles.
    [Show full text]
  • First Documentation of Scent-Marking Behaviors in Striped Skunks (Mephitis Mephitis)
    Mammal Research (2021) 66:399–404 https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-021-00565-8 ORIGINAL PAPER First documentation of scent-marking behaviors in striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) Kathrina Jackson1 & Christopher C. Wilmers 2 & Heiko U. Wittmer 3 & Maximilian L. Allen4 Received: 9 October 2020 /Accepted: 16 March 2021 / Published online: 11 April 2021 # Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Bialowieza, Poland 2021 Abstract Communication behaviors play a critical role in both an individual’s fitness as well as the viability of populations. Solitary animals use chemical communication (i.e., scent marking) to locate mates and defend their territory to increase their own fitness. Previous research has suggested that striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) do not perform scent-marking behaviors, despite being best known for using odor as chemical defense. We used video camera traps to document behaviors exhibited by striped skunks at a remote site in coastal California between January 2012 and April 2015. Our camera traps captured a total of 71 visits by striped skunks, the majority of which (73%) included a striped skunk exhibiting scent-marking behaviors. Overall, we documented 8 different scent-marking behaviors. The most frequent behaviors we documented were cheek rubbing (45.1%), investigating (40.8%), and claw marking (35.2%). The behaviors exhibited for the longest durations on average were grooming (x =34.4s) and investigating (x = 21.2 s). Although previous research suggested that striped skunks do not scent mark, we documented that at least some populations do and our findings suggest that certain sites are used for communication via scent marking.
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Bear (Ursus Arctos) John Schoen and Scott Gende Images by John Schoen
    Brown Bear (Ursus arctos) John Schoen and Scott Gende images by John Schoen Two hundred years ago, brown (also known as grizzly) bears were abundant and widely distributed across western North America from the Mississippi River to the Pacific and from northern Mexico to the Arctic (Trevino and Jonkel 1986). Following settlement of the west, brown bear populations south of Canada declined significantly and now occupy only a fraction of their original range, where the brown bear has been listed as threatened since 1975 (Servheen 1989, 1990). Today, Alaska remains the last stronghold in North America for this adaptable, large omnivore (Miller and Schoen 1999) (Fig 1). Brown bears are indigenous to Southeastern Alaska (Southeast), and on the northern islands they occur in some of the highest-density FIG 1. Brown bears occur throughout much of southern populations on earth (Schoen and Beier 1990, Miller et coastal Alaska where they are closely associated with salmon spawning streams. Although brown bears and grizzly bears al. 1997). are the same species, northern and interior populations are The brown bear in Southeast is highly valued by commonly called grizzlies while southern coastal populations big game hunters, bear viewers, and general wildlife are referred to as brown bears. Because of the availability of abundant, high-quality food (e.g. salmon), brown bears enthusiasts. Hiking up a fish stream on the northern are generally much larger, occur at high densities, and have islands of Admiralty, Baranof, or Chichagof during late smaller home ranges than grizzly bears. summer reveals a network of deeply rutted bear trails winding through tunnels of devil’s club (Oplopanx (Klein 1965, MacDonald and Cook 1999) (Fig 2).
    [Show full text]
  • The Striped Skunk Mephitis Mephitis Is About the Size of a Cat, but Has a Stout Body, a Rather Small Head, Short Legs, and a Bushy Tail
    Introduction This animal • produces an odour that is strong enough to be carried almost 1 km on the wind • is one of the most useful small mammals that inhabit Canada’s mixed farmlands, grasslands, and forests • gathers leaves for its den by placing them under its body and then shuffling along with the leaves held between its legs • annoys farmers by raiding beehives and henhouses, but in fact almost 70 percent of a skunk’s diet is estimated to benefit people Description The striped skunk Mephitis mephitis is about the size of a cat, but has a stout body, a rather small head, short legs, and a bushy tail. Its small head fits conveniently, but sometimes too snugly, into enticing open jars. The thick, glossy fur is black, with a thin white stripe down the centre of the face and a broad white stripe beginning on the back of the head, forking at the shoulders and continuing as a white stripe along each side of the back to the base of the tail. The tail is mostly black, but the stripes may extend down it, usually to a tuft of white at the tip. The skunk has long, straight claws for digging out the burrows of mice, ripping apart old logs for grubs and larvae, and digging in the sand for turtle eggs. It moves slowly and deliberately and depends for safety not on running away or on remaining inconspicuous, but on its scent glands. Skunks belong to the weasel family Mustelidae, all of whose members have well-developed scent glands and a musky odour.
    [Show full text]
  • Encounter Competition Between a Cougar, Puma Concolor, and A
    64 thE CanaDian FiElD -n atUraliSt Vol. 127 Encounter Competition between a Cougar, Puma concolor , and a Western Spotted Skunk, Spilogale gracilis MaxiMilian l. a llEn 1,4 , l. M ark ElbroCh 2,3 , and hEiko U. W ittMEr 1,3 1School of biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, P.o. box 600, Wellington 6140, new Zealand 2Panthera, 8 West 40th Street, 18th Floor, new York, new York 10018 USa 3Department of Wildlife, Fish and Conservation biology, University of California at Davis, 1 Shields avenue, Davis, California 95616 USa 4Corresponding author; email: [email protected] allen, Maximilian l., l. Mark Elbroch, and heiko U. Wittmer. 2013. Encounter competition between a Cougar, Puma concolor , and a Western Spotted Skunk, Spilogale gracilis . Canadian Field-naturalist 127(1): 6 4– 66. Encounter competition occurs frequently over food resources and may include kleptoparasitism, where scavengers usurp prey killed by carnivores. Scavenging may have important adverse effects on carnivores and may result in higher than expected kill rates by predators. Using camera traps placed on a black-tailed Deer ( Odocoileus hemionus columbianus ) carcass killed by a Cougar ( Puma concolor ) in California, we observed a series of encounters in which a Western Spotted Skunk ( Spilogale gracilis ) temporally usurped the carcass from the Cougar. the Western Spotted Skunk also successfully defended the carcass when the Cougar returned and attempted to feed. the Spotted Skunk was about 1% of the mass of the Cougar. our observation is the largest reported size differential of a mammalian species engaging in successful encounter competition. key Words: Cougar, Mountain lion, Puma concolor, Western Spotted Skunk, Spilogale gracilis, encounter competition, k lep - toparasitism, competition, California.
    [Show full text]
  • In This Issue
    Vol. 1, Issue 2. Dec. 2005 Wild CatThe CougarNews Network’s tri-annual publication dedicated to the scientific research of North American wild cats IN THIS ISSUE Camera Trapping Ocelots in Belize The Margays of El Cielo Bobcats and Vehicles in Southern Illinois Status of Lynx in New Brunswick Cougars in Michigan’s Sleeping Bear Dunes? Mountain Lions of New Mexico DNA and the Origin of North American Pumas Cougar Management Guidelines BOARD OF DIRECTORS Clay Nielsen • IL Harley Shaw • NM Ken Miller • MA Mark Dowling • CT Bob Wilson • KS _______ SCIENTIFIC ADVISORS Adrian P. Wydeven • WI Bill Watkins • MB Ron Andrews • IA Darrell Land • FL Dave Hamilton • MO Jay Tischendorf • MT _______ Editor: Scott Wilson © 2005 The Cougar Network: Using Science to Understand Cougar Ecology Cover Photograph: © Daniel J. Cox/NaturalExposures.com Camera Trapping Ocelots in Belize, Central America by Adam Dillon Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife Sciences Ocelots (Leopardus padalis) are a From the 1950s to the mid-1980s, listed on Appendix I of the Convention bobcat-sized feline that weigh approxi- animal pelts were in high demand for on International Trade in Endangered mately 20 pounds and live in a variety international trade, and ocelots were Species (CITES), and laws have been of dense habitats, from the southern heavily exploited throughout their created in many countries to restrict United States to northern Argentina. range. Since then, ocelots have been hunting. Although these laws have They are solitary, nocturnal decreased hunting pres- hunters that establish terri- sure, habitat destruction is tories, with males defend- currently threatening ing larger home ranges ocelot populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Bear Ecology
    New Jersey School of Conservation One Wapalanne Road Branchville, NJ 07826-5116 800-624-7780 or 973-948-4646 Fax: 973-948-5131 http://www.csam.montclair.edu/njsoc/ Black Bear Ecology (Ursus americanus) DESCRIPTION: This investigation of the Black Bear (Ursus Americanus) concentrates on adaptations, ecological relationships, conservation and management, and the general life history traits of this species. Participants will have the opportunity to examine a black bear pelt and skull, to discuss the natural history of black bear in New Jersey, to learn about the research techniques that have been employed to study these large omnivores, and to look for bear signs while hiking around the forested SOC campus. In the field, students will observe evidence of bear activity, examine a live-trap used for capturing black bear, investigate several den sites, and cover the data that bear researchers record. The session will conclude with an examination of the issues surrounding the interface of black bears and humans, and the impact humans have on the availability of black bear habitat. OBJECTIVES: • Students will describe black bear natural history and ecology in New Jersey. • Students will locate and identify signs of black bear in the forest during a hike and relate the signs to specific survival behaviors. • Students will develop observational/inquiry skills by generating questions about black bear ecology. • Students will compare, contrast and evaluate black bear conservation and management possibilities. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: See Black Bear Fact Sheet MATERIALS: • In the classroom: Bear hide and skull, bear paw replica and tracking box, photographs of bear and bear signs, Star Ledger’s Back Bear Poster.
    [Show full text]
  • Veterinary Care of Ferrets, Raccoons and Skunks Elizabeth Thatcher Iowa State University
    Volume 42 | Issue 1 Article 9 1980 Veterinary Care of Ferrets, Raccoons and Skunks Elizabeth Thatcher Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/iowastate_veterinarian Part of the Small or Companion Animal Medicine Commons Recommended Citation Thatcher, Elizabeth (1980) "Veterinary Care of Ferrets, Raccoons and Skunks," Iowa State University Veterinarian: Vol. 42 : Iss. 1 , Article 9. Available at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/iowastate_veterinarian/vol42/iss1/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Iowa State University Veterinarian by an authorized editor of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. diagnostic for but were consistent with a Medicine, Volume 1, Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders clinical diagnosis ofheat stroke. 10 Co., pp 394-395. 3. Hoskins, H. P., Lacroix, J. V., and Mayer, K. (ed): Canine Medicine, 2nd Edition, revised; American A Clinical Case of Heat Exhaustion Veterinary Publications, Inc. 1962, pp. 708-712. A 2~ -year-old male Doberman was 4. Kirk, R. W. (ed): Current Veterinary Therapy VI, presented to the ISU Small Animal Clinic on Philadelphia, W. B. Saunders Co., 1977, pp July 1 with a history of collapsing suddenly 202-205. 5. Krum, S. H.: Heatstroke in the dog: a polysystemic after vomiting while it was eating. The dog disorder. JA VMA (1977) 170(5)531-535. had been playing before it was fed. When it 6. Lewis, S.: Effect of heat on canines and felines.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Skunks to a Simulated Increase in Coyote Activity
    Journal of Mammalogy, 88(4):1040–1049, 2007 RESPONSE OF SKUNKS TO A SIMULATED INCREASE IN COYOTE ACTIVITY SUZANNE PRANGE* AND STANLEY D. GEHRT Max McGraw Wildlife Foundation, P.O. Box 9, Dundee, IL 60118, USA (SP, SDG) The Ohio State University, School of Natural Resources, 210 Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA (SP, SDG) Present address of SP: Ohio Division of Wildlife, 360 E State Street, Athens, OH 45701, USA Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jmammal/article/88/4/1040/908153 by guest on 01 October 2021 An implicit assumption of the mesopredator release hypothesis (MRH) is that competition is occurring between the larger and smaller predator. When significant competition exists, the MRH predicts that larger species should affect population size, through direct predation or the elicitation of avoidance behavior, of smaller predators. However, there have been few manipulations designed to test these predictions, particularly regarding avoidance. To test whether striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis) avoid coyotes (Canis latrans), we intensively monitored 21 radiocollared skunks in a natural area in northeastern Illinois. We identified 2 spatially distinct groups and recorded 1,943 locations from September to November 2003. For each group, testing periods consisted of 4 weeks (2 weeks pretreatment, 1 week treatment, and 1 week posttreatment). We simulated coyote activity during the treatment week by playing taped recordings of coyote howls at 1-h intervals at 5 locations. Additionally, we liberally applied coyote urine to several areas within 20 randomly selected 100 Â 100-m grid cells, and used the grid to classify cells as urine-treated, howling-treated, or control.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Hog−Nosed Skunk (Conepatus Leuconotus)
    FIELD GUIDE TO NORTH AMERICAN MAMMALS North American Hog−nosed Skunk (Conepatus leuconotus) ORDER: Carnivora FAMILY: Mephitidae Conservation Status: A subspecies, the Big Thicket Hog−nosed Skunk, Conepatus mesoleucus telmalestes, is Extinct. Skunks are seldom thought of as useful animals, but Hog−nosed Skunks can be helpful to farmers because they eat crop−destroying Conepatus leuconotus − eastern variant (base of tail is black) insects. They have powerful forelimbs and long claws, suited to Credit: painting by Consie Powell from Kays and Wilson's Mammals of North America, © Princeton University Press digging up insect larvae and grubs. They also eat plant matter and (2002) sometimes small rodents if the opportunity arises. Like Striped and Spotted skunks, they are best known for the scent produced by, and sprayed from, their anal glands. Spraying is a last resort. The skunk's dramatic black and white coat serves as a warning signal to other mammals, and its first response is to run. A frightened Hog−nosed Skunk may then turn around to face its adversary, stand on its hind feet, and take a few steps forward, then come down on all fours and hiss. If that doesn't work, the next step is to bare its teeth, raise its tail, and bite, spray, or both. Also known as: Gulf Coast Hog−nosed Skunk, White Backed Skunk, Rooter Skunk, Texan Skunk, Badger Skunk, Conepat Length: Average: 636.5 mm males; 589.7 mm females Range: 444−934 mm males; 445−840 mm females Weight: Range: 1,135−4,500 g http://www.mnh.si.edu/mna 1 FIELD GUIDE TO NORTH AMERICAN MAMMALS Hooded Skunk (Mephitis macroura) ORDER: Carnivora FAMILY: Mephitidae The Hooded Skunk is a desert animal, preferring rocky canyons and valleys, and the vegetation along stream edges.
    [Show full text]