The Public Understanding of Science in the 1920S: Relativity and Evolution
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945
Records of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, 1891-1957, Record Group 85 New Orleans, Louisiana Crew Lists of Vessels Arriving at New Orleans, LA, 1910-1945. T939. 311 rolls. (~A complete list of rolls has been added.) Roll Volumes Dates 1 1-3 January-June, 1910 2 4-5 July-October, 1910 3 6-7 November, 1910-February, 1911 4 8-9 March-June, 1911 5 10-11 July-October, 1911 6 12-13 November, 1911-February, 1912 7 14-15 March-June, 1912 8 16-17 July-October, 1912 9 18-19 November, 1912-February, 1913 10 20-21 March-June, 1913 11 22-23 July-October, 1913 12 24-25 November, 1913-February, 1914 13 26 March-April, 1914 14 27 May-June, 1914 15 28-29 July-October, 1914 16 30-31 November, 1914-February, 1915 17 32 March-April, 1915 18 33 May-June, 1915 19 34-35 July-October, 1915 20 36-37 November, 1915-February, 1916 21 38-39 March-June, 1916 22 40-41 July-October, 1916 23 42-43 November, 1916-February, 1917 24 44 March-April, 1917 25 45 May-June, 1917 26 46 July-August, 1917 27 47 September-October, 1917 28 48 November-December, 1917 29 49-50 Jan. 1-Mar. 15, 1918 30 51-53 Mar. 16-Apr. 30, 1918 31 56-59 June 1-Aug. 15, 1918 32 60-64 Aug. 16-0ct. 31, 1918 33 65-69 Nov. 1', 1918-Jan. 15, 1919 34 70-73 Jan. 16-Mar. 31, 1919 35 74-77 April-May, 1919 36 78-79 June-July, 1919 37 80-81 August-September, 1919 38 82-83 October-November, 1919 39 84-85 December, 1919-January, 1920 40 86-87 February-March, 1920 41 88-89 April-May, 1920 42 90 June, 1920 43 91 July, 1920 44 92 August, 1920 45 93 September, 1920 46 94 October, 1920 47 95-96 November, 1920 48 97-98 December, 1920 49 99-100 Jan. -
1 When Induction Was About Concepts John P. Mccaskey
When Induction Was About Concepts John P. McCaskey Stanford University The philosophy professor says, ―This swan is white. That swan is white. And so is the other,‖ and asks, ―May we legitimately infer that all swans are white?‖ In this way the students are introduced to induction or, as we seem always to call it, the ―problem‖ of induction. Deduction presents no real problem, we say, but induction brings no end of trouble. It is stubborn, recalcitrant, rebellious. We can almost hear Henry Higgins singing, ―Why can‘t a woman be more like a man?‖ or ―Why can‘t induction be more like deduction? / Deduction is so honest, so thoroughly square / eternally noble, historically fair. / Why can‘t induction be more like deduction ?‖ Higgins does not sing that, but Nicholas Rescher, for example, says, ―An inductive inference can always be looked upon as an aspiring but failed deductive inference.‖1 Rescher speaks for virtually all epistemologists of the last hundred years. But this position was not always so common. There were times when induction was not thought to be a problematic sort of inference. In fact, there were times induction was not thought to be primarily about propositional inference at all. Induction was about forming sound concepts and good definitions. This essay recalls those times. Recalling them is important for three reasons. First, doing so will help check our temptation to think our predecessors were too naïve, careless, or stupid to see the obvious. ―How could Francis Bacon have thought his method of induction would lead to certainty?!‖ ―How could William Whewell not have appreciated Hume‘s challenge to induction?!‖ ―How could Aristotle have thought all induction reduces to complete enumeration?!‖ But these men were not stupid. -
Field Expedition Records, 1914, 1923-1942
Field Expedition Records, 1914, 1923-1942 Finding aid prepared by Smithsonian Institution Archives Smithsonian Institution Archives Washington, D.C. Contact us at [email protected] Table of Contents Collection Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Administrative Information .............................................................................................. 1 Descriptive Entry.............................................................................................................. 1 Names and Subjects ...................................................................................................... 1 Container Listing ............................................................................................................. 3 Field Expedition Records http://siarchives.si.edu/collections/siris_arc_238795 Collection Overview Repository: Smithsonian Institution Archives, Washington, D.C., [email protected] Title: Field Expedition Records Identifier: Accession 02-051 Date: 1914, 1923-1942 Extent: 10.69 cu. ft. (19 document boxes) (2 half document boxes) (1 16x20 box) Creator:: Freer Gallery of Art Language: Language of Materials: English Administrative Information Prefered Citation Smithsonian Institution Archives, Accession 02-051, Freer Gallery of Art, Field Expedition Records Descriptive Entry This accession consists of records documenting the joint expedition made by the Freer Gallery of Art and the Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, from February 20, -
Chapter Ten William Whewell: Lyell's Labours And
CHAPTER TEN WILLIAM WHEWELL: LYELL'S LABOURS AND IDEAS Although Lyell and Sedgwick are usually seen as champions of antagonistic theories of geology, they actually share more in their scientific outlooks than is often supposed. Their religious suppositions are very much the same and, as honest scientists and believers, both join in a battle to "free the science from Moses." Even their respective defences of uniformity and catastrophism seem at times to merge so much as hardly to merit the name of controversy. Such seems to be the conclusion of the philosopher of science William Whewell. Lyell's research was a major influence on Whewell's geological thinking. He reviewed the first and the second volume of Principles, and, although not disposed to accept the theory of uniformity, he discusses Lyell as no other scientist in the long sections on geology in both the History of the Inductive Sciences (1837) and its sequel the Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences ( 1840). William Whewell, son of a Lancashire carpenter, born in 1794, was Lyell's senior by only three years. He was not an original contributor to the science of geology, but his extensive knowledge of the physical sciences included geology. Much practical geology he no doubt picked up during the many field tours with Sedgwick.1 Whewell's entrance in 1811 at Trinity College, Cambridge, as a sizar, was followed by a long and successful career there, which culminated in his nomination to the influential post of Master of Trinity after Christopher Wordsworth's resignation in 1842. As a fellow of Trinity he had to take clerical orders, but he showed none of the reluctance to theological studies that Sedgwick felt, and his learning in this field led to the prestigious appointment of Professor of Moral Philosophy in 1838. -
Federal Reserve Bulletin December 1925
FEDERAL RESERVE BULLETIN DECEMBER, 1925 ISSUED BY THE FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD AT WASHINGTON Recent Banking Developments Business Conditions in the United States The New Central Bank of Chile WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1925 Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis FEDERAL RESERVE BOARD Ex officio members: D. R. CRISSINGEE, Governor. EDMUND PLATT, Vice Governor. A. W. MELLON, Secretary of the Treasury, Chairman. ADOLPH C. MILLER. CHARLES S. HAMLIN. J. W. MCINTOSH, GEORGE R. JAMES. Comptroller of the Currency. EDWARD H. CUNNINGHAM. WALTER L. EDDY, Secretary. WALTER WYATT, General Counsel. J. C. NOELL, Assistant Secretary. WALTER W. STEWART, Director, Division of Research W. M. IMLAY, Fiscal Agent. and Statistics. J. F. HERSON, E. A. GOLDENWEISER, Assistant Director, Division of Chief, Division of Examination, and Chief Federal Research and Statistics. Reserve Examiner. E. L. SMEAD, Chief, Division of Bank Operations. FEDERAL ADVISORY COUNCIL District No. 1 (BOSTON) CHAS. A. MORSS. District No. 2 (NEW YORK) PAUL M. WARBURG, President. District No. 3 (PHILADELPHIA) L. L. RUE. District No. 4 (CLEVELAND) GEORGE A. COULTON. District No. 5 (RICHMOND) JOHN M. MILLER, Jr. District No. 6 (ATLANTA) OSCAR WELLS. District No. 7 (CHICAGO) FRANK O. WETMORE. District No. 8 (ST. LOUIS) BRECKINRIDGE JONES. District No. 9 (MINNEAPOLIS) G. H. PRINCE. District No. 10 (KANSAS CITY) > E. F. SWINNEY, Vice President. District No. 11 (DALLAS)-. .-.-—-. W. M. MCGREGOR. District No. 12 (SAN FRANCISCO) __—.-*. HENRY S. MCKEE. II Digitized for FRASER http://fraser.stlouisfed.org/ Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis OFFICERS OF FEDERAL RESERVE BANKS Federal Reserve Bank of— Chairman Governor Deputy governor Cashier Boston . -
Death Certificate Index - Monroe (7/1919-1925 & &/1935-1939) 5/21/2015
Death Certificate Index - Monroe (7/1919-1925 & &/1935-1939) 5/21/2015 Name Birth Date Birth Place Death Date County Mother's Maiden Name Number Box Abegglen, Lucia 1852 Indiana 03 July 1936 Monroe Unknown G68-0097 D2803 Abramson, Bertha c.1841 Sweden 23 May 1922 Monroe Unknown 68-0200 D2359 Acheson, Margret c.1840 Ohio 16 Apr. 1922 Monroe Simes 68-0194 D2359 Acord, Ira Patterson 08 Dec. 1830 Ohio 17 Feb. 1920 Monroe Oliver 68-2403 D2358 Acuff (Baby Boy) 18 Aug. 1922 Iowa 20 Aug. 1922 Monroe Patterson 68-0252 D2359 Acuff, Agness c.1887 Iowa 01 Sept. 1922 Monroe Dodd 68-0248 D2359 Adair, Charles 26 Mar. 1870 Iowa 18 Dec. 1939 Monroe Van Gordum 68-0157 D2906 Adams, Grace 26 Sept. 1894 Iowa 11 Apr. 1925 Monroe Clark 68-0847 D2360 Adams, Mary Martha 02 Dec. 1845 Pennsylvania 14 Dec. 1923 Monroe Clever 68-0582 D2359 Adams, Verna May 20 Apr. 1923 Iowa 13 Sept. 1923 Monroe Housley 68-0533 D2359 Adkins, Martha Ella Dec. 1921 Iowa 31 Jan. 1923 Monroe Grevitt 68-0404 D2359 Adkinson, Mary Eliz 1856 Iowa 17 Dec. 1938 Monroe Raunk J68-0170 D2873 Albright, Mabel 14 June 1911 Missouri 15 Oct. 1925 Monroe Weatherly 68-0948 D2360 Alexander, Wanetta L. c.1921 Iowa 26 Mar. 1922 Monroe Miller 68-0158 D2359 Alford, William 28 Mar. 1861 Kentucky 28 Mar. 1924 Monroe Matterson 68-0635 D2359 Allen, Chaney O. 15 June 1861 Michigan 03 June 1924 Monroe Knowlton 68-0695 D2359 Allen, Hattie 11 Dec. 1889 Iowa 11 Aug. 1919 Monroe Grieves 68-2299 D2358 Allen, Jenette 10 Feb. -
E D I T O R I a L
E D I T O R I A L “RETRO-PROGRESSING” As one browses through the history section of a library, one of the volumes that is likely to catch one’s attention is The Discoverers by Daniel Boorstin.1 It is an impressive, 700-page volume. Published in 1983, it chronicles in a semi-popular style selected aspects of man’s discoveries. Two chapters entitled “The Prison of Christian Dogma” and “A Flat Earth Returns” deal with the outlandish con- cept of an earth that is flat instead of spherical. Boorstin has impressive academic credentials from Harvard and Yale, and has held prestigious positions such as the Librarian of Congress, Director of the National Museum of History and Tech- nology, and Senior Historian of the Smithsonian Institution. In The Discoverers he reflects the popular view that the ancient Greeks, including Aristotle and Plato, believed Earth to be a sphere; however, after the rise of Christianity a period of “scholarly amnesia” set in which lasted from around 300 to 1300 A.D. During this time, according to Boorstin, “Christian faith and dogma replaced the useful [spherical] image of the world that had been so slowly, so painfully, and so scrupulously drawn by ancient geographers.” The “spherical” view was replaced by the concept of a flat earth, which Boorstin characterizes as “pious caricatures.”2 Boorstin bolsters his case by mentioning a couple of minor writers — Lactantius and Cosmas — who believed in a flat earth and lived during this “dark age.” He also implicates the powerful authority of St. Augustine of Hippo (354-430), who “heartily agreed” that antipodes “could not exist.”3 Antipodes represented lands on the opposite side of a spherical earth where trees and men, if present, would be upside down, with their feet above their heads; hence, the “antipodes” (opposite-feet) designation. -
1925 Congressional Reoord-Sen Ate 1945
1925 CONGRESSIONAL REOORD-SEN ATE 1945 By Mr. WYANT: A bill (H. R. 11699) granting an increase ance blll (S. 3218) ; to the Committee en the District of of pension to Elizabeth Clark; to the Committee on Invalld Columbia. Pensions. 3471. Also, petition of G. H. Martin and others, protesting Also, a bill (H. R. 11700) gran!ing an increase of pension against the Sunday observance bill· .( S" 3218) ; to the Com· to Mary L. Deemet ; to the Oomm1ttee on Invalid Pensions. mittee on the District of Columbia. By Mr. KNUTSON: Resolution (H. Res. 405) to pay to Walter C. Neilson $1,500 for extra and expert services to the Committee on Pensions by detail from the Bureau of Pensions ; SENATE to the Committee on Accounts. FRIDAY, January 16, 1925 PETITIONS, ETC. (Legislative day of Thursday, Jatntu.a1"1J 15, 1!125) Under clause 1 of Rule XXII, petitions and papers were laid The Senate met in open executive session at 12 o'clock on the Clerk's· desk and referred as follows: meridian, on the expiration of the recess. 3456. By the SPEAKER (by request) : Petition of Federation The PRESIDENT pro tempore. The Ohair lays before the of Citizens' Associations of the District of Columbia, asking for Senate the treaty with Cuba. a more definite proportionate contribution by the Federal Gov l\.lt. CURTIS. M.r. President, I suggest the absence of a ernment and the District of Columbia in appropriations for the quorum. maintenance, upkeep, and development of the Federal territory; The PRESIDENT pro temp01·e. The Clerk will call the to the Committee on the District of Columbia. -
“The Sixth Sense”: Towards a History of Muscular Sensation
Gesnerus 68/1 (2011) 218–71 “The Sixth Sense”: Towards a History of Muscular Sensation Roger Smith* Summary This paper outlines the history of knowledge about the muscular sense and provides a bibliographic resource for further research. A range of different topics, questions and approaches have interrelated throughout this history, and the discussion clarifies this rather than presenting detailed research in any one area. Part I relates the origin of belief in a muscular sense to empiricist accounts of the contribution of the senses to knowledge from Locke, via the idéologues and other authors, to the second half of the nine- teenth century. Analysis paid much attention to touch, first in the context of the theory of vision and then in its own right, which led to naming a distinct muscular sense. From 1800 to the present, there was much debate, the main lines of which this paper introduces, about the nature and function of what turned out to be a complex sense. A number of influential psycho-physiolo- gists, notably Alexander Bain and Herbert Spencer, thought this sense the most primitive and primary of all, the origin of knowledge of world, causa- tion and self as an active subject. Part II relates accounts of the muscular sense to the development of nervous physiology and of psychology. In the decades before 1900, the developing separation of philosophy, psychology and physiology as specialised disciplines divided up questions which earlier writers had discussed under the umbrella heading of muscular * The stimulus for writing up this paper, which I had long put off because I hoped to do some- thing more rounded, came from the participants, and especially from the organisers, Vincent Barras and Guillemette Bolens, of a project ‘L’intelligence kinesthésique et le savoir sensori- moteur: entre arts et sciences’, at a conference of World Knowledge Dialogue, ‘Interdisci- plinarity in action: a p ractical experience of interdisciplinary research’, Villars-sur-Ollon, Switzerland, 10–14 October 2010. -
The London Gazette, 7 July, 1925
4534 THE LONDON GAZETTE, 7 JULY, 1925. The undermentioned Flying Officers are AFTER LIMITED COMPETITION. granted the honorary rank of Flight Lt.:— Admiralty: Departmental Clerical Class, Leslie Steuart HAMILTON (Capt. Indian William Joseph Andrews. Army, retd.). 4th June 1925. Post Office: Female Telegraphist, Londont William Frederic HUMPHERY (Lt., R.N., Ivy Florence Maynard. retd.). 4th May 1925. Eichard Edgar Bryant ROSE (Lit., R.N., Female Sorting Clerks and Telegraphists, retd.). 22nd June 1925. Mabel Beckwith (Derby), Kathleen Hobson Flight Lt. John Augustus BARRON is (Bristol). placed on half-pay, scale B, from 7th July WITHOUT COMPETITION. 1925 to 15th Sept. 1925 inclusive. Admiralty, H.M. Dockyards and Naval Estab- Pilot Officer Alexander Hutchinson MONT- lishments: Engine Fitters, Edward Charles GOMERY takes rank and precedence as if his Hinks, William Charles Neate, Alfred appointment as Pilot Officer bore date 19th Robert Stainbank Wells. May 1925. Eeduction to take effect from Inland Revenue: Stampers, Arthur George 25th May 1925. Lyme, Walter Leonard Moon, George The undermentioned Flying Officers are Frederick Mullis. transferred to the Reserve:— Post Office: Contract Officer, Lewis James CLASS A. Leonard Thomas. Thompson James SHAW. ' 5th July 1925. Male Sorter, London, Frederick Timms. Donald Risborough SHARMAN, M.C. 7th Male Sorting Clerk and Telegraphist, July 1925. Mil ford Haven, Hubert William Lewis. CLASS C. Female Sorting Clerk and Telegraphist, Cyril Arthur MASON. 9th May 1925. Maesteg, Bridgend, Phyllis Margaret Edmond King CLIFFORD. 27th June 1925. Davies. Skilled Workman, Emmanuel Charles Pilot Officer Jack Alexander BRAMLEY re- Streeter. linquishes his shprt service commission on account of illhealth. 8th July 1925. -
The Frisco Employes' Magazine, July 1925
-VOL. I1 No. 10 JULY 1925 HE thought uppermost in the minds of innun~crahlepassengers Tarriving in and (!:parting from railway stations in this country daily. Many of the trains carrying these passcngers and thousands of the pas- sengers arc ((on time" with Illinois Watches. The enormous demand for complctc. Bunn Specials, illustrated above, is evidence of their popularity with railway lucn everywhere. ILLINOIS WATCH COMPANY THE FRISCO EMPLOYES' MAGAZINE 827 FRISCO BUILDING .. ST. LOUIS WM. L. HUGGINS . Jr .. Editor MARTHA C . MOORE Asrociate Editor VOL . I I JULY. 1925 No . 10 Permission is given to reprint. with credit. in part or in full. any article appearing in the Magazine Contents of This Issue PAGE A Message from President Kurn ..................................................................................................... 2 Third Annual Veterans Reunion at Springfield ................................................................... 3 7 Better Service Contest Winners for July ................................................................................. 8- 9 Miss Marybelle Newman Chosen Missouri University Beauty Queen ....................................10 Sixteen Hundred Strawberry Cars via Frisco this Season................................................... 11-13 "Among Ourselves," The Clerks. Cartoon-By /oh . Godscy ................................................14 Our Front Cover ....................................................................................................................................15 -
Copyrighted Material
9781405175432_1_pre.qxd 2/10/09 14:00 Page vii Contents List of Figures and Table xii Notes on Editors xiii Personal Acknowledgments xiv Text Acknowledgments xv Volume Introduction 1 Part I Introduction 5 Unit 1 The Ancient and Medieval Periods 13 1.1 Atoms and Empty Space 21 Diogenes Laertius 1.2 Letter to Herodotus 22 Epicurus 1.3 The Paradoxes of Motion 24 Zeno 1.4 Plato’s Cosmology 26 Plato 1.5 The StructureCOPYRIGHTED and Motion of the Heavenly SpheresMATERIAL 31 Aristotle 1.6 Change, Natures, and Causes 34 Aristotle 1.7 Scientific Inference and the Knowledge of Essential Natures 44 Aristotle 1.8 The Cosmos and the Shape and Size of the Earth 49 Aristotle 1.9 The Divisions of Nature and the Divisions of Knowledge 57 Aristotle 1.10 On Methods of Inference 62 Philodemus 9781405175432_1_pre.qxd 2/10/09 14:00 Page viii viii contents 1.11 The Explanatory Power of Atomism 64 Lucretius 1.12 The Earth: Its Size, Shape, and Immobility 70 Claudius Ptolemy 1.13 The Weaknesses of the Hypotheses 74 Proclus 1.14 Projectile Motion 76 John Philoponus 1.15 Free Fall 79 John Philoponus 1.16 Against the Reality of Epicycles and Eccentrics 82 Moses Maimonides 1.17 Impetus and Its Applications 86 Jean Buridan 1.18 The Possibility of a Rotating Earth 91 Nicole Oresme Unit 2 The Scientific Revolution 95 2.1 The Nature and Grounds of the Copernican System 108 Georg Joachim Rheticus 2.2 The Unsigned Letter 110 Andreas Osiander 2.3 The Motion of the Earth 112 Nicholas Copernicus 2.4 The New Star 120 Tycho Brahe 2.5 A Man Ahead of His Time 123 Johannes Kepler