Agenda (530) 661-0816

AGENDA (530) 661-0816

NOTICE NOTICE

If requested, this agenda can be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and the Federal Rules and Regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Persons seeking an alternative format should contact Kathy Souza, Executive Assistant, for further information. In addition, a person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in a public meeting should telephone or otherwise contact Kathy Souza as soon as possible and preferably at least 24 hours prior to the meeting. Kathy Souza may be reached at telephone number (530) 661-0816 or at the following address: 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776. It is the policy of the Board of Directors of the Yolo County Transportation District to encourage participation in the meetings of the Board of Directors. At each open meeting, members of the public shall be provided with an opportunity to directly address the Board on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board of Directors. Please fill out a speaker card and give it to the Board Clerk if you wish to address the Board. Speaker cards are provided on a table by the entrance to the meeting room. Depending on the length of the agenda and number of speakers who filled out and submitted cards, the Board Chair reserves the right to limit a public speaker’s time to no more than three (3) minutes, or less, per agenda item.

MEETING DATE: July 10, 2017 MEETING TIME: 7:00 P.M. MEETING PLACE: YCTD Board Room 350 Industrial Way Woodland, CA 95776

The Chairman reserves the right to limit speakers to a reasonable length of time on any agenda item, depending upon the number of people wishing to speak and the time available.

Time

Estimated

Deliberation/Action

Info/Discussion 7:00 PM 1. Call to order/roll call/Pledge of Allegiance X (Voting members: Woodland, Davis, West Sacramento, Winters, Yolo County) (Nonvoting members: Caltrans, UCD) 7:00 2. Consider Approval of Agenda for July 10, 2017 meeting X 7:00 3. Comments from public regarding matters NOT on the Agenda, but within the purview of X YCTD

CONSENT CALENDAR 7:00 4a. Approve YCTD Board Minutes for Meeting of June 12, 2017 (Souza) (pp 1-4) X 7:00 4b. Approve Proposed Revisions in YCTD Intern Hourly Wage Rates (Extra Help) (Luken) (pp X 5-6) 7:00 4c. Authorize Executive Director to Amend Memorandum of Understanding for the Downtown X Riverfront Streetcar Project (Bassett) (pp 7-19) REGULAR CALENDAR 7:00 5. Board Member Reports, Announcements, Other Nominations, Presentations (Oral Reports) X - Consider Nomination of Nathan Streeter as City of Davis Representative on YCTD’s Citizens Advisory Committee (p 21) 7:00 6. Oral Update from Transdev(Carmen Alba, Transdev General Manager) X

7:00 7. Consider Proposed Steps for Financing and Building a Third CNG Skid (Bassett) (pp 23- X 46) 7:15 8. Consider Proposed Steps to Be Included in Smart Phone Fare Pre-payment System Hosted by X Sacramento RT (Luken) (pp 47-65) 7:30 9. Update on Development of Countywide Transportation Capital Improvement Plan (Luken) X (pp 67-68) 7:45 10. Review 2016-17 Yolo County Grand Jury Report, Findings and Recommendations X Regarding Bicycle Safety and Bicycle Related Facilities (Bassett) (pp 69-78) 7:55 11. Consider Director’s Report (Bassett, Luken, Phillips) (pp 79-81) X a. Oral Report b. Autonomous Shuttle Vehicle Display Event by Transdev c. Status of West Sacramento On-Demand Transit Service RFP d. Update on Other CNG Matters i. PG&E Pipeline Work ii. Troubleshooting and Removing Oil in CNG Buses e. Attachments i. Ridership Report through May 31, 2017 8:10 12. Adjournment X THE NEXT MEETING OF THE YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS WILL BE AUGUST 14, 2017 AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE YCTD BOARD ROOM, 350 INDUSTRIAL WAY, WOODLAND, CA 95776. The Board reserves the right to take action on all agendized items, including items under the Executive Director's Report, at any time during the meeting, except for timed public hearings. Items considered routine or non-controversial are placed on the Consent Calendar. Any Consent Calendar item can be separately addressed and discussed at the request of any member of the YCTD Board. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing agenda was posted on or before Friday July 7, 2017 at the Yolo County Transportation District Office (350 Industrial Way, Woodland, California). Additionally, copies were FAXED or transmitted electronically to the Woodland, Davis, West Sacramento and Winters City Halls, as well as to the Clerk of the Board for the County of Yolo.

Kathy Souza, YCTD Clerk to the Board

YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING June 12, 2017 Yolo County Transportation District Board Room 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776 Agenda Item 1 – Call to Order/Roll Call/Pledge of Allegiance Chair Saylor called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. Ms. Souza called role. Chair Saylor asked Mrs. Bryan to lead the assembly in the pledge of allegiance. The following representatives were in attendance: Davis – Lucas Frerichs (Primary) West Sacramento – Chris Ledesma (Primary) Winters – Harold Anderson (Primary) Woodland – Tom Stallard (Alternate) Yolo County – Don Saylor (Primary) Caltrans District 3 – Jeff Morneau (Primary) UC Davis – Matt Dulcich (Primary) Staff present were Terry Bassett, YCTD Executive Director; Mike Luken, YCTD Deputy Director Operations, Planning & Special Projects; Tom Follansbee, YCTD Associate Transportation Planner; Daisy Ramirez, YCTD Assistant Transportation Planner; Hope Welton, YCTD Legal Counsel; and Kathy Souza, YCTD Executive Assistant. Also present was Carmen Alba, Transdev. Agenda Item 2–Consider Approval of Agenda for June 12, 2017 meeting Minute Order 2017-19 Director Frerichs made the motion, seconded by Director Ledesma, to approve the agenda for the June 12, 2017 meeting. Roll call resulted in: AYES: Anderson, Frerichs, Ledesma, Saylor, Stallard NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion passed. Agenda Item 3 - Comments from public regarding matters NOT on the Agenda, but within the purview of YCTD None Agenda Item 4–Consent Calendar Minute Order 2017-20 Director Frerichs made the motion, seconded by Director Ledesma, to approve the following items on the Consent Calendar. 4a. Approve YCTD Board Minutes for Meeting May 8, 2017 4b. Adopt Resolution Authorizing Filing of Grant Applications and Executing Grant Agreements and Supplemental Documents Roll call resulted in: AYES: Anderson, Frerichs, Ledesma, Saylor, Stallard NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion passed. Agenda Item 5 - Board Member Reports, Announcements, Appointment Nominations, Presentations Director Stallard reported he had toured the new State Theatre and mentioned a Gala scheduled for June 28, 2017 to benefit the Yolo Food Bank. 1

Agenda Item 6–Oral Update from Transdev Carmen Alba, General Manager Transdev:  In recognition of June being National Safety Month Transdev would provide a Safety Awareness lunch of Friday, June 30th o Week 1: Stand Up to Falls – Slips, Trips & Falls o Week 2: Fatigue o Week 3: Active Shooter & Workplace Violence  Monthly Safety Meetings would address: o Operator Development Program module on Safety Best Practices  Transdev continued to work with YCTD staff to fully implement the Connect Card program in June Agenda Item 7 – Public Hearing on Proposed 2017/18 Preliminary YCTD Budget Mr. Bassett presented the staff report along with a PowerPoint presentation. He reviewed the summary table requested by the directors at the May board meeting. He stated the proposed policy for unrestricted reserves would set aside three (3) months of reserves. The impact on each jurisdiction was reviewed. Director Dulcich asked if the income from the contract for exterior bus advertising was included. Mr. Bassett responded there was income included but informed the board that the contracted firm was in the process of dissolving it’s partnership and the District had terminated that contract. He added that a new solicitation would occur. Chair Saylor asked how the reserve policy compared to those of other agencies. Mr. Bassett replied that he had no data from other agencies. Director Saylor then asked what methodology was used to choose the 3-month figure. Mr. Bassett stated that was chosen as to provide the least impact on financial contributions by the jurisdictions. Chair Saylor asked if there was no industry standard. Mr. Bassett stated he was unaware of such a standard. Chair Saylor opened the Public Hearing at 7:34 pm and called for public comment. There being no members of the public desiring to provide comment, Chair Saylor closed the Public Hearing at 7:34 pm Director Ledesma thanked staff for preparation of the summary table. Director Frerichs requested that the summary page be included in the final adopted budget. He added that staff should research what policies other transit agencies had for unrestricted reserves. Minute Order 2017-21 Having reviewed the staff report and conducted a public hearing regarding the proposed changes, Director Stallard made the motion, seconded by Director Frerichs, to adopt the proposed preliminary 2017/18 YCTD budget as the final 2017/18 budget including the summary table. Roll call resulted in: AYES: Anderson, Frerichs, Ledesma, Saylor, Stallard NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion passed. Agenda Item 8 – Consider Appointing Board Subcommittee to Guide Development of Countywide Transportation Capital Improvement Plan Mr. Luken presented the staff report. Chair Saylor asked what consideration was given to UC Davis planning. Mr. Luken stated that their staff could certainly be invited to participate. Director Ledesma thanked Mr. Luken for the update and stated he was trying to understand the board subcommittee’s function and asked if it would be a sounding board for recommendations to the board. He also asked for the proposed timing of check-ins and milestones. Mr. Luken responded the first draft should be ready by fall 2017 and a final in winter. Director Ledesma suggested including Union Pacific in the stakeholder discussions. Mr. Bassett expressed his hope that the city councils and board of supervisors would provide direction to their respective TAC members. He stated that TAC members could well be hesitant to prioritize projects without such direction.

Mrs. Welton was asked if an ex-officio could serve on the ad hoc committee with two voting members without being in violation of the Brown Act. She replied that would be acceptable. Discussion was held on setting milestones so that upcoming funding opportunities could be met. Minute Order 2017-22 Director Frerichs made the motion, seconded by Director Anderson, to: 1. Receive a report from District staff on the concept for completing a Countywide Transportation Capital Improvement Plan. 2. Appoint a subcommittee of the Board, comprised of Directors Saylor, Rodriguez and Dulcich, to guide the preparation of a Countywide Transportation Capital Improvement Plan 3. Direct the Executive Director to transmit to the Yolo Managers Group, a formal request for participation by both Public Works and Community Development Directors and to work through the YCTD Technical Advisory Committee to complete this project 4. Direct the Executive Director to transmit to the Executive Director of Unitrans and the Yolo-Solano Air Quality Management a formal request for participation and to work through the YCTD Technical Advisory Committee to complete this project. Roll call resulted in: AYES: Anderson, Frerichs, Ledesma, Saylor, Stallard NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion passed. Agenda Item 9 – Select Chair, Vice-Chair for the 2017/18 Fiscal Year Minute Order 2017-23 Director Stallard made the motion, seconded by Director Anderson, to nominate for Fiscal Year 2017/18 Director Rodriguez as Chair and Director Frerichs as Vice Chair. Roll call resulted in: AYES: Anderson, Frerichs, Ledesma, Saylor, Stallard NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None The motion passed. Agenda Item 10 - Consider Director’s Report Mr. Bassett and Mr. Luken reviewed portions of the Director’s Report f. Oral Report – g. Roll-Out Ceremony for Regional Connect Card h. Change in Assistant Transportation Planner Personnel – Mr. Bassett introduced Daisy Romero as the new provisional Assistant Planner. i. May is Bike Month Update – Mr. Luken reviewed the staff report. j. Group Federal Low-No-Grant Application – k. Re-solicitation for Bus Exterior Advertising Contractor – Mentioned during budget discussion. l. Update on CNG Matters i. Third CNG Skid ii. PG&E Pipeline Work iii. Troubleshooting excess oil in CNG m. Final results for Bus Naming Contest n. Attachments

i. Ridership Report through April 30, 2017 ii. Quarterly Performance and Financial Reports thru March 31, 2017 iii. Thank You Letter Regarding “Touch a Truck” Event in Woodland Director Stallard expressed concern about the drop in ridership. Mr. Bassett responded that Sacramento Regional Transit was showing similar number and would bring suggestions to future meetings. Director Stallard stated that Capitol Corridor ridership was up and suggested contacting their marketing department. Mr. Bassett replied that he would contact them. Agenda Item 10 – Adjournment The motion passed unanimously. Following passage of the motion, the meeting adjourned at 8:09 pm.

Respectfully submitted:

, Clerk to the Board

BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776----(530) 661-0816 Topic: Agenda Item#: Approve Proposed Revisions in YCTD Intern Hourly Wage Rates (Extra Help) 4b Agenda Type: Deliberation/*Action Attachments: Yes No Prepared By: Mike Luken Approved By: Meeting Date: July 10, 2017

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the YCTD Board of Directors approve the attached recommended revisions to the hourly wage rates for Transportation Interns. REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: Wage scales for the transportation interns do not reflect current changes in the State Minimum Wage and have not been updated since 2007. BACKGROUND: In 2007, the Board approved changes to the transportation intern job description and wage scale. Since that time, the District has employed many interns from UC Davis and Sacramento State. Most of the interns have gone on to professional positions in transportation planning for the District, for agencies throughout the Sacramento Region and positions outside the region. Agencies employing some of our former intern staff include Unitrans, Caltrans, SAMTRANS, AC Transit, Valley Transportation Authority (Santa Clara) and SACOG. Our intern staff has assisted in the completion of the following recent projects:

1) Ongoing Temporary Reroutes 2) Service Schedule Distribution 3) Promotional Item/Announcements Graphic Design and Production 4) Bus Stop Inventory and Assessments 5) Y Shuttle Implementation and Staffing 6) Woodland Transit Study 7) Woodland and West Sacramento Route Changes 8) Social Media Implementation 9) National Transit Database Triennial Survey

BUDGET IMPACT:

The recommended wage scale is attached and comparisons from other agencies are attached. Staff recommends a modest increase. $57,368 in combined wages and limited benefits for intern positions is included in the adopted final 17/18 budget. Caltrans continues to fund a majority (over $50,000) of the intern costs through its competitive Sustainable Communities Grant Program.

Yolo County Transportation District Proposed Revisions in Student Intern Hourly Wage Rates Adopted October 14, 2007/Proposed 7/10/17

Current (Adopted Proposed WEST WOOD- YSAQMD 10/14/07) 7/10/17 SACOG SAC DAVIS LAND YOLO First Year Student (Less than equivalent of 30 semester units completed) $10.50- $10.50- $10.37- $15.28- A. No relevant work experience $9.50 $11.50 $12.26 $15.00 NA $11.50 $12.01 18.58

B. At least equivalent of 15 semester units completed or 500 hours of appropriate experience. $9.75 $11.75 $12.86 C. For every year of relevant comparable experience (up to 3 years or $0.75) NA $0.25 NA Second Year Student (Equivalent of 30 semester units completed) A. No relevant work experience. $10.00 $12.00 $13.17

B. At least equivalent of 45 semester units completed or 500 hours of appropriate experience $10.25 $12.25 $13.82 C. For every year of relevant comparable experience (up to 3 years or $0.75) NA $0.25 NA Third Year Student (Equivalent of 60 semester units completed) A. No relevant work experience. $10.50 $12.50 $14.14

B. At least equivalent of 75 semester units completed or 500 hours of appropriate experience. $10.75 $12.75 $14.38 C. For every year of relevant comparable experience (up to 3 years or $0.75) NA $0.25 NA Fourth Year Student (Equivalent of 90 semester units completed) A. No relevant work experience $11.50 $13.50 $15.20

B. At least equivalent of 105 semester units completed or 500 hours of appropriate experience. $12.00 $14.00 $15.95 C. For every year of relevant comparable experience (up to 3 years or $0.75) NA $0.25 NA Graduate Student (B.A. or B.S. Degree Completed) A. No relevant work experience $12.50 $14.50 $16.38 $15.00

B. At least equivalent of 9 semester units completed or 500 hours of appropriate experience. $13.00 $15.00 $17.19 $20.00

C. For every year of relevant comparable experience (up to 3 years or $0.75) NA $0.25

BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776----(530) 661-0816 Topic: Agenda Item#: Authorize Executive Director to Amend 4c Memorandum of Agenda Type: Deliberation/Action* Understanding for the Downtown Riverfront Streetcar Project Attachments: Yes No Prepared By: Mike Luken Approved By: Meeting Date: July 10, 2017

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Yolo County Transportation District Board of Directors 1) Authorize the Executive Director, or his/her designee, to execute Amendment 2 of the July 23, 2013 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for Design of the Downtown /Riverfront Streetcar Project; and 2) Authorize the Executive Director, or his/her designee, to execute future amendments to this MOU for future extensions of the MOU termination date, subject to such amendments not increasing YCTD’s costs. REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: The MOU was approved the Board of Directors in 2012, executed in 2013, amended for time in 2016 and needs to be further extended through the completion of the design phase of the project. BACKGROUND: The Board authorized the Executive Director to sign the MOU at its October and December 2012 meetings (original approval and minor modification at the time) which was executed on July 13, 2013. The Streetcar project has moved into the final design phase of the track alignment and vehicle design. The project is included in the President’s budget for the first time this year and funding requests from the State Cap and Trade Program and the City of Sacramento are pending. The purpose of this simple amendment is to accommodate a time extension needed to complete that final design phase of streetcar work. BUDGET IMPACT: None.

AMENDMENT NO. 2 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AND THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO, THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, THE SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT, AND THE YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT FOR PLANNING THE DOWNTOWN/RIVERFRONT TRANSIT (“STREETCAR”) PROJECT

This Amendment No. 2 to the September 4, 2013, Memorandum of Understanding (“Agreement”) between the City of Sacramento, the City of West Sacramento, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (“SACOG”), the Sacramento Regional Transit District (“RT”), and the Yolo County Transportation District (“YCTD”). Each party is referred to individually as “Participating Agency” and collectively as “Participating Agencies”.

WHEREAS, the Participating Agencies entered into an Amendment No. 1 on June 29, 2016, as it relates to Term; and

WHEREAS, the Participating Agencies wish to again further amend the Agreement as it relates to Term.

NOW, THEREFORE, SACOG and Contractor agree as follows:

1. Section 5.2 (Termination) is modified to read as follows:

“This Agreement will automatically terminate on June 30, 2018, or by action of the PSC, whichever occurs first.”

2. Section 9 (Term) is modified to read as follows:

“This MOU shall be effective on the date of the last signature affixed hereto and shall terminate on June 30, 2018, unless otherwise extended or terminated earlier by mutual agreement or as set forth herein.”

3. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when executed and delivered shall constitute a duplicate original, but all counterparts together shall constitute a single agreement.

4. Except as expressly amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTIES HAVE ENTERED INTO THIS AGREEMENT AS OF THE DATE HEREIN ABOVE APPEARING:

SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL SACRAMENTO REGIONAL OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSIT DISTRICT:

______JAMES CORLESS Date: HENRY LI Date: Chief Executive Officer General Manager/CEO

CITY OF SACRAMENTO: CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO:

______HECTOR BARRON Date: MARTIN TUTTLE Date: Director of Public Works City Manager

YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT:

______TERRY BASSETT Date: Executive Director

AMENDMENT NO. 1 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS AND THE CITY OF SACRAMENTO, THE CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, THE SACRAMENTO REGIONAL TRANSIT DISTRICT AND THE YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT FOR PLANNING THE DOWNTOWN/RIVERFRONT TRANSIT PROJECT

This Amendment No. 1 to the July 23, 2013, Memorandum of Understanding (“Agreement”) between the City of Sacramento, the City of West Sacramento, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), the Sacramento Regional Transit District (RT), and the Yolo County Transportation District (YCTD). Each party is referred to individually as “Participating Agency” and collectively as “Participating Agencies.”

WHEREAS, the Participating Agencies wish to amend the Agreement as it relates to Time of Performance.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Participating Agencies agree as follows:

1. Section 5.2, (Termination), is modified to read as follows:

“This Agreement will automatically terminate on June 30, 2017, or by action of the PSC whichever occurs first.”

2. Section 9, (Term), is modified to read as follows:

“This MOU shall be effective on the last date set out below and shall terminate on June 30, 2017, unless otherwise extended or terminated earlier by mutual agreement or as set forth herein.”

3. Except as expressly amended herein, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.

(Signature Page to Follow)

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE PARTICIPATING AGENCIES HAVE ENTERED INTO THIS MOU ON THE LAST DATE SET OUT BELOW:

SACRAMENTO AREA COUNCIL SACRAMENTO REGIONAL OF GOVERNMENTS TRANSIT DISTRICT:

______MIKE MCKEEVER Date: MICHAEL R. WILEY Date: Chief Executive Officer General Manager/CEO

APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO FORM

______KIRK E. TROST General Counsel for SACOG Counsel for SRTD

CITY OF SACRAMENTO: CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO:

______JERRY WAY Date: MARTIN TUTTLE Date: Director of Public Works City Manager

APPROVED AS TO FORM APPROVED AS TO FORM

______

CITY ATTORNEY/SACRAMENTO CITY ATTORNEY/WEST SACRAMENTO

YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT:

______TERRY BASSETT Date Executive Director

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR PLANNING THE DOWNTOWN/RIVERFRONT TRANSIT PROJECT

THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) is entered into as of the last date of execution and is between the City of Sacramento, the City of West Sacramento, the Sacramento Area Council of Governments (SACOG), the Sacramento Regional Transit District (RT), and the Yolo County Transportation District (YCTD). Each party is referred to individually as “Participating Agency” and collectively as “Participating Agencies.” RECITALS

WHEREAS, in 2004, SACOG adopted the Blueprint, a bold vision for growth that promotes compact, mixed-use development, and more transit choices; and

WHEREAS, the Cities of West Sacramento and Sacramento are considering numerous development plans within two miles of downtown Sacramento that support SACOG’s Blueprint principles; and WHEREAS, both cities desire to accelerate the development of quality transit choices and other alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle travel that minimize vehicle miles traveled and stimulate economic development; and WHEREAS, a feasibility study, conceptual engineering, and environmental analysis for a rail transit project between downtown Sacramento and West Sacramento were completed in 2009; and WHEREAS, the City of Sacramento adopted in 2012 a conceptual streetcar network within the City of Sacramento jurisdiction, and identified an initial starter line; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Transportation Plan (MTP) includes a streetcar linking Sacramento and West Sacramento; and WHEREAS, the Participating Agencies desire to continue planning collaboratively for future transit linkage between Sacramento and West Sacramento; and WHEREAS, the Participating Agencies presently intend to pursue a Federal Transit Administration (FTA) funding application and to conduct an effort in accordance with FTA’s guidance; provided, however, that the Participating Agencies may consider other funding options for the Project and take actions necessary to pursue other funding options; and

WHEREAS, this MOU is intended to amend, restate, and replace that Memorandum of Understanding for Planning the Downtown/Riverfront Streetcar Project, in order to continue the Policy Steering Committee and the planning efforts by the Participating Agencies for a transit project between downtown Sacramento and West Sacramento. THEREFORE, THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: PURPOSE The purpose of this MOU is to facilitate the continued planning by the Participating Agencies for the “Project,” which is defined as a transit improvement project linking downtown Sacramento and West Sacramento within the corridor defined by the Downtown/Riverfront Streetcar Feasibility Study and the Sacramento Streetcar Planning Study. The current phase of the Project, and the activities and purposes governed by this MOU, will be complete when the Participating Agencies have submitted a completed application to the FTA for authorization to proceed to the next phase for a federally-funded project, and FTA has made a determination regarding such application. The intent of the Participating Agencies is to achieve this Project purpose in light of the best available information concerning the new federal transportation bill (MAP-21) and Small Starts funding guidance, and to continue refining the Project activities and redirecting budget resources, as and if necessary, to achieve the Project purpose. PROJECT OVERSIGHT

Policy Steering Committee (PSC) The City of Sacramento and the City of West Sacramento will each appoint two (2) representatives and one (1) alternate representative from their respective city councils. YCTD and RT will each appoint one (1) representative and one (1) alternate representative from their respective boards of directors to serve on the Policy Steering Committee (PSC). In addition, each city will appoint two (2) representatives from the local community or business and development interests to serve on the PSC. Each Participating Agency reserves the right to appoint additional alternates. Each representative and alternate will serve at the pleasure of the appointing Participating Agency. An alternate may serve as a voting member of the PSC in the absence of the representative that represents the same Participating Agency, in the same capacity (e.g., as elected representative or as non-elected representative), as the alternate. Each representative shall have one (1) vote in all matters and a simple majority vote of the members present shall determine the direction on any actions requiring a vote. The elected representatives from the city council of the City of Sacramento shall have a total of two (2) votes on all matters before the PSC. Both votes may be cast by one elected representative if only one elected representative from the City is present. The elected representatives from the city council of the City of West Sacramento shall have a total of two (2) votes on all matters before the PSC. Both votes may be cast by one elected representative if only one elected representative from the City is present. A majority of the members, including at least two of the representatives appointed by each city, including at least one elected official of each city, must be present to create a quorum of the PSC. The PSC may not take formal action unless a quorum is present when the action is taken. All meetings of the PSC will be posted and conducted in accordance with the Brown Act (Government Code Sections 54950 et seq.) and will be open to the public. Co-Chairs shall be elected at the first meeting of the PSC under this MOU, and thereafter shall be elected annually at the first meeting in each calendar year. The responsibility of the Co- Chairs shall be to preside over the meetings of the PSC. The PSC shall:

1) Approve goals, objectives, scope of work, milestones, and a schedule for the Project, as well as the Need & Purpose for the Project;

2) Adopt Downtown/Riverfront Transit Project Underlying Principles and Roles & Responsibilities specifying in more detail the roles and responsibilities of the Project Manager (as defined in § 2.4) and the Deputy Project Managers representing the Participating Agencies, and providing for the replacement of the Project Manager or Deputy Project Managers, if necessary;

3) Provide policy direction regarding the additional planning work, alternatives selection and route refinement (if applicable), environmental analysis, financial analysis, procurement strategies, and a proposed funding and governing structure for the Project (collectively hereinafter the “Study”);

4) Participate in public outreach and assist in communicating the goals and objectives of the Project and gaining support among interest groups and the broader public; and

5) Accept a Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) for the Project; recommend adoption of the LPA to the Sponsoring Agency; authorize the Sponsoring Agency (as defined in § 2.4) to submit materials to the FTA for review and action; authorize the Sponsoring Agency to submit an application to the FTA for authorization to proceed to the next phase for a federally-funded project; and, as appropriate, provide guidance to the Project Management Team (PMT) on any matters raised by the FTA.

All Participating Agencies agree that the LPA – including all financial commitments, transit alignments, designs, and station locations – shall be subject to approval by each of the Participating Agencies. Project Management Team (PMT) Each Participating Agency shall identify at least one (1) staff member to meet regularly to assist the Project Manager in the successful advancement of the Project. Additionally, one (1) staff member from Caltrans will participate as a member. The Project Manager shall serve as the lead of the PMT for matters before the PSC. Support Committees The Project Manager and PMT may establish support committees as needed throughout the Project, including advisory committee(s). Each Participating Agency shall identify at least one (1) staff member with special expertise as required and available from its engineering, maintenance, operations, land use planning, economic development, or other technical group to meet regularly to assist the Project Manager in the successful advancement of the Project. Additionally, at least one (1) staff member from Caltrans will participate on matters related to the Tower Bridge and the Capitol Mall overcrossing of Interstate 5. The support committees will report to the PMT. Sponsoring Agency and Project Manager SACOG shall serve as the “Sponsoring Agency” for administration of any funding grants. Kirk Trost, on behalf of SACOG, shall also serve as Project Manager. The Project Manager shall have responsibility for successful completion of this phase of the Project. “Successful completion” shall be defined and determined by the PSC. The Project Manager shall solicit the input and participation of the other Participating Agencies to achieve consensus on the Project work.

AUDIT AND INSPECTION All Participating Agencies financially participating in the Project will retain accounting records and other documents pertaining to all costs for three (3) years from the termination of this Agreement. These records and documents must be made available for inspection and audit by an authorized representative of any Participating Agency to this Agreement upon ten (10) days’ advance written notice and during normal business hours. INDEMNITY Pursuant to Section 895.4 of the California Government Code: (1) each Participating Agency, as indemnitor, must hold harmless and indemnify every other Participating Agency, as indemnitee, against any claim, loss, damage, expense or liability caused by the negligent or wrongful act of omission of the indemnitor occurring in the performance of this Agreement, and (2) if a Participating Agency is held liable upon any judgment for damage caused by a negligent or wrongful act or omission occurring in the performance of this MOU and that Participating Agency pays in excess of its share based upon principles of comparative fault, that Participating Agency is entitled to contribution from each of the other Participating Agencies to the extent of the other Participating Agency’s comparative fault. WITHDRAWAL AND TERMINATION

Withdrawal Withdrawal of a Participating Agency shall be effective after thirty (30) days written notification to the PSC and the other Participating Agencies of the intent to withdraw. Withdrawal of a Participating Agency releases any right that agency may have to claim funds allocated for the Project, its local match contribution, and any other funding committed to the Project, unless the PSC and the remaining Participating Agencies agree to amend this MOU accordingly. Termination This Agreement will automatically terminate on June 30, 2016, or by action of the PSC, whichever occurs first.

NOTICES Any notices required by this Agreement must be in writing and either given in person or by first class mail with postage prepaid and addressed as shown below. Any Participating Agency may change its name or address for notices at any time by providing notice to all of the other Participating Agencies. City of Sacramento: Regional Transit: John Shirey Michael R. Wiley City Manager General Manager/CEO City of Sacramento Sacramento Regional Transit District 915 I Street P.O. Box 2110 (1400 29th Street) Sacramento, CA 95814 Sacramento CA 95812-2110 Phone: (916) 808-5704 Phone: (916) 321- 2989 Fax: (916) 808-7618 Fax: (916) 444-2156 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected]

City of West Sacramento: Yolo County Transportation District: Martin Tuttle Terry Bassett City Manager Executive Director City of West Sacramento Yolo County Transportation District 1110 West Capitol Avenue 350 Industrial Way West Sacramento, CA 95691 Woodland CA 95776 Phone: (916) 617-4500 Phone: (530) 402-2812 Fax: (916) 372-8765 Fax: (530) 661-1732 e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected]

SACOG: Mike McKeever Chief Executive Officer SACOG 1415 L Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: (916) 340-6205 Fax: (916) 321-9551 e-mail: [email protected]

A copy of all notices shall be provided by first class mail with postage prepaid and addressed as shown below.

City of Sacramento: Regional Transit: Director of Public Works Asst. General Manager of Planning City of Sacramento and Transit System Development 915 I Street, 2nd Floor Sacramento Regional Transit District Sacramento, CA 95814 P.O. Box 2110 (1400 29th Street) Sacramento CA 95812-2110

City of West Sacramento: Yolo County Transportation District: Director of Public Works Deputy Director City of West Sacramento Yolo County Transportation District 1110 West Capitol Avenue 350 Industrial Way West Sacramento, CA 95691 Woodland CA 95776

SACOG: Chief Operating Officer SACOG 1415 L Street, Suite 300 Sacramento, CA 95814

INITIATION OF SERVICE This MOU does not commit or authorize any Participating Agency to provide transit service within the respective jurisdiction of any other Participating Agency, unless this Agreement is amended and revised by agreement of the Participating Agencies. However, existing transfer agreements, which address transit service coordination issues between RT and YCTD, shall remain valid and in effect until otherwise agreed to by both of these parties. AUTHORITY AND EFFECT Each of the signatories to this MOU represents that he/she is authorized to sign the MOU on behalf of such Participating Agency, that all approvals, resolutions, and consents which must be obtained to bind such Participating Agency have been obtained, and that no further approvals, acts or consents are required to bind such Participating Agency to this MOU. This MOU shall amend, restate, and replace the Memorandum of Understanding for Planning the Downtown/Riverfront Streetcar Project and shall continue the Policy Steering Committee and the planning efforts by the Participating Agencies for a transit project between downtown Sacramento and West Sacramento.

TERM This MOU shall be effective on the last date set out below and shall terminate on June 30, 2016, unless otherwise extended or terminated earlier by mutual agreement or as set forth herein.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Participating Agencies have entered into this MOU on the day and year set out in the last date set out below.

City of Sacramento

By: ______Date: ______John Shirey City Manager

City of West Sacramento

By: ______Date: ______Christopher Cabaldon Mayor

Sacramento Area Council of Governments

By: ______Date: ______Michael McKeever Chief Executive Officer

Sacramento Regional Transit District

By: ______Date: ______Mike R. Wiley General Manager/CEO

Yolo County Transportation District

By: ______Date: ______Terry Bassett Executive Director

BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776 --- (530) 661-0816 Topic: Agenda Item #: Consider Proposed Steps for Financing and Building a 7 Third CNG Skid Agenda Type: Deliberation/Action Attachments Yes No Prepared by: Terry V. Approved by: Meeting Date: July 10, 2017 Bassett

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Yolo County Transportation District Board of Directors: 1) Approve the attached proposed revised term sheet with Trillium LLC and authorize YCTD’s Executive Director to amend these terms into Agreement Number 2004-03 between Yolo County Transportation District and Trillium USA Company, LLC, subject to review and minor adjustments recommended by YCTD’s legal counsel; and 2) Approve the design, permitting, construction, testing and commissioning of a third Compressed Natural Gas skid for YCTD by Trillium LLC at a cost not to exceed $1,009,000, plus change orders up to a cumulative total of no more than $50,000; and 3) Approve Trillium LLC’s proposed interim financing of said improvements:  Base Trillium Contract: $1,009,900  Change Orders: Up to 50,000  Max. Trillium Loan Amount: $1,059,900

 Effective Date of Loan: Upon commissioning/YCTD acceptance of the CNG Improvements (estimated around January 30, 2018--29 weeks after execution date of agreement amendment.)  Annual Interest Rate: 4%  Loan principal and Interest Due Date: 6 months (estimated around July 30, 2018) after commissioning/YCTD acceptance  No Pre-payment Penalty  If principal and interest are not fully paid by the loan due date (estimated at July 30, 2018_, the annual interest rate charged to YCTD for the remaining balance will be 17%

4) Direct staff to finalize steps to obtain proposals to finance up to $1,159,900, which is estimated at the above $1,059,900 in Trillium fees, plus up to $100,000 to cover YCTD project management, testing services and other unforeseen YCTD expenses. (Note that loan issuance fees would be in addition to the above amounts.)

5) Acknowledge that due to proprietary operational and technical considerations, as well as the need for complete integration of a third CNG into the Trillium-built CNG facility, this procurement must be a sole source procurement requiring an independent cost analysis; and 6) Acknowledge that YCTD had an independent contractor perform a cost analysis of Trillium’s proposal and that the total cost for this sole source project is reasonably close to the independent contractor’s cost estimate. REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: The recommendation allows YCTD to initiate steps with its CNG facility contractor, Trillium LLC, to increase the flow rates of CNG to accommodate growing consumption at YCTD’s CNG facilities, while enabling YCTD to recover part of that expense through a surcharge at the public CNG dispenser. BACKGROUND: In November, 2016, the YCTD Board approved a proposed Term Sheet with Trillium. Since then, staff has been negotiating changes in that term sheet. Note that major changes from the November, 2016 version are highlighted in yellow. The above recommendation will allow YCTD and Trillium to proceed with designing, constructing and financing a third CNG skid. YCTD and Trillium staff both believe that the best way to address YCTD’s increasing concerns with the District’s CNG fueling window and reliability is a comprehensive CNG facility upgrade that includes the addition of a third natural gas compressor at the CNG station to increase the volume of output, plus a priority sequencing device that will give YCTD buses fueling priority over vehicles fueling at the public island. Such an upgrade is the best long-term solution for both the District’s CNG needs and the public’s increasing CNG demand at the public pump, which is currently estimated at 28.6%. This percentage of third-party consumption was never anticipated to be this high and it could grow higher, particularly if truck fleets transition over to CNG. In January, 2016, Trillium gave YCTD a proposal to add a third skid. Its proposed cost was $990,000. In June, 2017, Trillium updated its proposed price to $1,009,900, which represents a price increase of 2% over 18 months, compared to a PPI rate change of 1.8%. In January, 2016, YCTD brought in its own CNG consultant, Fuel Solutions, which verified that Trillium’s proposed costs were reasonable. At that time, the consultant’s estimate was $914,211. Adjusting for a 1.8% PPI change over 18 months, plus adding in the costs for permitting, the consultant’s total comes to $986,034, which is 2.4% less than Trillium’s proposed price. YCTD staff therefore concluded that the Trillium June, 2017 price of $1,009,900 is fair and reasonable. Staff is also proposing to spend up to an additional $50,000 (less than 5% of the total price) for change orders, plus up to $100,000 for other YCTD costs, such as project management and system testing and other unforeseen YCTD costs. We have proposed a surcharge of 16 cents per gallon of gas equivalent (GGE) from third party sales at the public dispenser to pay for a pro-rata share of the capital investment contribution towards the third skid. (Note that this is in addition to 35 cents per GGE in other reimbursements to YCTD for third-party use of the base CNG facility.) To make the numbers palatable and not price the fuel product beyond affordability by third party purchasers, staff proposes to extend the Agreement with Trillium from December 6, 2020 to June 30, 2026. Staff recommends the solicitation of financing to cover the estimated total project cost of $1,159,900. Trillium will cover up to $1,059,900 of this amount at 4% for up to six months from commissioning date of the improvements; however, it is very important for YCTD to obtain long-term financing to avoid the interest rate jumping to 17% with

a new 60 month financing term if the Trillium loan is not paid off within those six months. The length of the loan, interest rate, and any issuance fees will affect the monthly debt payment. Currently, staff is assuming 9 years to pay off the loan. While the loan term could be longer, staff may recommend a staying with 9-year payback, in case any subsequent CNG maintenance/operations contract requires other changes in the station. Regarding the likelihood of obtaining 9-12 year financing from an outside party, at least two entities have shown a high degree of interest in proposing a package. Again, the model being used assumes that a 16 cent per therm surcharge be levied at the public island to recover at least 28.6% of the debt payments associated with the facility upgrade. One uncertainty relates to CNG consumption at the public island. Waste Management currently fuels 31 trucks at YCTD’s public CNG dispenser. That firm has indicated that it may have its own CNG system constructed within the next couple years, yet they also indicated their intention to use YCTD’s dispenser to fill garbage trucks during the day due to truck use and range issues. Additionally, several inquiries have been made from outside entities about fueling their trucks and other vehicles at the public island. Additionally, YCTD and the other transit operators in the region depend on each other’s CNG facility to offer redundancy in case their system fails. YCTD, Unitrans, the Sacramento International Airport shuttle buses, Elk Grove Transit, Sacramento Regional Transit District, Paratransit Incorporated, and Placer Transit all use CNG and benefit by having some sort of reciprocal capability for fueling at alternative sites when needed. The Davis Airporter, bus manufacturers delivering CNG buses via the I-5 and I-80 corridor, public agencies with CNG cars, PG&E, and other entities like UPS all benefit from YCTD’s facilities, so improving capacity is in everyone’s interests. Ultimately, YCTD may want to have discussions with Trillium about lengthening its CNG public station footprint to allow larger trucks to fuel at the public island. An advantage to YCTD is that it could potentially collect more revenue from outside sales. Further research needs to occur to determine whether or not such a venture is within the best interests of YCTD and the City of Woodland. BUDGET IMPACT: The adopted budget assumes a $1.3 million CNG third skid is built, which exceeds the $1,159,900 total project cost described in this report. The annual debt service payment will be dependent upon the interest rate and term that financing entities propose. The adopted budget assumes $133,603 in annual payments. By our calculations, the annual payment could range from $109,853 to $162,111 per year, depending on how long the loan is for (9- 15 years). The longer the term, the more likely the financing companies may want some sort of rate re-opener.

TERM SHEET (July 11, 2017) 1) Contract expires at midnight, December 6, 2020 (as planned) if YCTD does not elect to have CONTRACTOR build a third CNG skid. In the event YCTD does have the CONTRACTOR install a third skid, the contract term shall be extended to June 30, 2026. 2) SCOPE OF WORK is amended to include the following:

a) CONTRACTOR shall, at CONTRACTOR’s expense, operate, maintain, rebuild or replace components of the entire CNG facility, as needed, to keep the facility fully operational, including all original CNG facility improvements, plus other improvements described in the Amendment. 3) CONTRACTOR shall perform the safety study described in Exhibit J of CONTRACTOR’s proposal at CONTRACTOR’s expense. The study will anticipate the proposed expansion and operation of the CNG station.

4) PUBLIC CNG DISPENSER USE. YCTD grants CONTRACTOR the authority to consume natural gas provided by YCTD, operate, maintain and repair all CNG facility equipment and components, compress and dispense CNG, as well as collect revenue and pay all fees attributable to the YCTD CNG public dispenser, including all commodity related fees and commissions. YCTD reserves the right to fuel some or all of its CNG vehicles from the CNG public dispenser, as needed. CONTRACTOR agrees to work with YCTD to assure that total expenses per therm or GGE associated with fueling YCTD vehicles at the public dispenser shall not exceed expenses per therm or GGE associated with fueling YCTD vehicles at the YCTD dispenser. 5) YCTD shall pay all charges and expenses associated procuring, compressing and dispensing natural gas at the CNG bus dispenser during the Term of the Agreement. Because YCTD is shifting to NGV-4, it must abide by California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) and Pacific Gas and Electric (PG&E) requirements established for non-core natural gas, including the possibility of natural gas curtailments in the event of natural gas fuel shortages or other emergencies. Both parties recognize this risk and agree to comply with curtailment requirements that are established by CPUC and PG&E. 6) For CNG facility operations and maintenance fees by CONTRACTOR, the following updated price table will apply, effective following the execution date of a contract between YCTD and the CONTRACTOR.

Volume Used per Rate Rate Month ($/therm) ($/GGE)

30,000 – 34,999 Therms $.454 $.567

35,000 – 39,999 Therms $.430 $.537

40,000 – 44,999 Therms $.418 $.522

45,000 – 49,999 Therms $.392 $.490

50,000 – 54,999 Therms $.364 $.455

55,000 – 59,999 Therms $.268 $.335

60,000 – 64,999 Therms $.249 $.311

65,000 – 69,999 Therms $.222 $.278

70,000 - 99,999 Therms $.209 $.261

100,000+ Therms $.200 $.250

(a) The rate per therm charged to YCTD shall be based on COMBINED therms dispensed at the YCTD CNG bus and YCTD CNG public dispensers on a monthly basis. YCTD shall not be required to pay CONTRACTOR maintenance and operations fees for third party CNG gallons dispensed through the YCTD public dispenser.

(b) The prices in this table will be inflated on an annual basis following PPI index: Pumps, Compressors, and Equipment1, or by 5% per year, whichever is less. The adjustment shall be effective January 1, 2018, and each subsequent year thereafter for the remainder of the term.

1 https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/WPU1141

7) CNG FACILITY PUBLIC ACCESS USE FEE:

a) Royalty:

i) CONTRACTOR agrees to pay to YCTD thirty-five cents ($0.35) per gasoline gallon equivalent (GGE) for CNG dispensed to third-party customers from YCTD’s CNG public dispenser during the Term of this Agreement. This reimbursement rate shall be increased by $0.01 per GGE, per year, effective January 1, 2018 and each subsequent year thereafter for the remainder of the term. CONTRACTOR shall not be assessed this royalty fee for CNG dispensed to YCTD.

ii) In the event YCTD authorizes improvements associated with a third skid, and upon completion and acceptance of that third skid, CONTRACTOR agrees to pay to YCTD an additional sixteen cents ($0.16) royalty per gasoline gallon equivalent (GGE), effective immediately, for CNG dispensed to third-party customers from YCTD’s CNG public dispenser during the Term of this Agreement. 8) OTHER FEES. Additionally, each month, CONTRACTOR shall pay or receive from YCTD, costs for or revenues associated with the pro-rata share of CNG sold to third parties. This includes the following:

a) All natural gas commodity expenses plus all transportation and distribution charges, Public Purpose Program (PPP) charges and any other California public utility commission related expenses passed on by the local utility which are intended for CNG sold to the public; b) All electricity related costs incurred to operate the CNG facility; c) In the event YCTD procures Renewable Natural Gas (RNG) through a third party, CONTRACTOR shall pay YCTD a pro-rata shares of the costs for RNG; d) In the event YCTD procures Renewable Natural Gas (RNG), YCTD shall credit to CONTRACTOR a pro-rata share of renewable natural gas (RNG) revenue generated from the sale of the environmental credits including but not limited to the federal RFS (Renewable Fuel Standard), the California LCFS (Low Carbon Fuel Standard) when the revenue is received. e) YCTD shall split with the CONTRACTOR any federal alternative fuel excise tax credits which are generated and received from third party sales at the YCTD public dispenser on a 50/50 basis.

9) CONTRACTOR shall collect and pay directly to the appropriate authorities local, state and federal taxes and fees that are applicable from sales to third parties.

10) In the event YCTD authorizes CONTRACTOR to build a third CNG skid, as described in Exhibit I, the following changes apply and shall be incorporated into an agreement amendment:

a) The construction project shall be completed by a mutually agreed upon date. b) YCTD shall compensate CONTRACTOR for permits, design, engineering, drawings, construction management and construction a fee not to exceed One Million, Nine Thousand, Nine-Hundred Dollars ($1,009,900). c) Payment Terms: i) YCTD shall pay CONTRACTOR an amount up to $1,059,900 which represents $1,009,900 for the base project, plus up to $50,000 for change orders. Said change orders shall be subject to review and approval by YCTD’s Executive Director, or his/her designee (see Section 15). ii) In addition, YCTD shall pay contractor interest which accrues following station commissioning and acceptance for up to 180 (one hundred eighty) days, or up to the point when the facility is paid in full. YCTD’s acceptance of the CNG facility shall not be unreasonably withheld. iii) CONTRACTOR will begin accruing interest on the base amount of $1,009,900 at 4% annual interest rate following station commissioning. CONTRACTOR will notify YCTD when commissioning is completed. iv) Change orders up to $50,000 may be added to the $1,009,900 base amount subject to the same terms and conditions. v) CONTRACTOR will not charge a pre-payment penalty if the accrued amount is paid off prior to 180 (one hundred eighty) days following station commissioning and acceptance. vi) Should YCTD fail to pay CONTRACTOR said amount within the 180 (one hundred eighty) day period, the interest rate will be revised to 17% per year, and YCTD will be required to make monthly payments to the CONTRACTOR over a subsequent 60 (sixty) month term for the amount due.

11) REAL ESTATE TAXES: YCTD shall pay directly to the appropriate taxing authority if assessed, charged, due and payable all real estate taxes and assessments, whether general or special, levied against the CNG related facility and improvements.

12) Throughout the demolition and construction, with the exception of no more than 4 hours in any day, CONTRACTOR will provide a continuous flow of CNG to the YCTD bus dispenser to meet YCTD’s needs and the public dispenser to meet those needs, coordinating closely with PG&E. YCTD and CONTRACTOR shall mutually determine when such 4-hour windows will be in effect.

13) CONTRACTOR shall propose a project demolition and construction, testing and acceptance schedule, after which time, CONTRACTOR may be subject to $141 per calendar day in liquidated damages for late completion.

14) CONTRACTOR acknowledges and agrees that the CNG compression and dispensing facility includes a pace-lock priority fueling upgrade, as part of the $1,009,900 third CNG skid project and shall sequence the system so that YCTD buses can be fueled first, per CONTRACTOR’s proposal.

15) CHANGE ORDERS: The YCTD Executive Director, or his/her designee, may approve a written request by CONTRACTOR for a change order, up to an aggregate increase for all change orders not to exceed $50,000. Combined change order requests which exceed the aggregate amount of $50,000 shall require the approval of the YCTD Board of Directors (hereinafter referred to as “YCTD Board”). CONTRACTOR must document in writing the need for the change order and must present adequate backup and justification, as determined solely by the YCTD Executive Director, or his/her designee. The YCTD Executive Director, or his/her designee and the YCTD Board will consider only reasonable change order requests and will act reasonably in response to each change order request. CONTRACTOR shall not perform any work proposed in the change order until CONTRACTOR receives written approval by the YCTD Executive Director, or his/her designee, and the YCTD Board, as appropriate.

16) Insurance. CONTRACTOR shall obtain and maintain a standard commercial general liability policy providing bodily injury and property damage insurance with coverage limits of not less than Two and a half million dollars ($2,500,000) per each occurrence and in the aggregate insuring against any and all liability of CONTRACTOR. Such insurance shall name YCTD as additional insured. CONTRACTOR shall provide YCTD with a certificate of insurance, which shall provide that the insurance may not be canceled without providing YCTD a minimum of thirty (30) calendar days’ prior written notice of such cancellation. Contractor shall be responsible for all costs associated with maintaining, repairing and operating the CNG facility, including all related subsystems on both the YCTD bus dispenser side and the public dispenser side. Such coverage shall include, but not be limited to, repair and replacement of all subsystems damaged, in need of rebuilding, lost or stolen.

17) YCTD reserves the right to establish rules that CONTRACTOR must follow as they relate to ingress and egress at YCTD’s facility and access to YCTD owned CNG systems and subsystems. CONTRACTOR shall perform work in a manner that does not interfere with the traffic flow and fueling of YCTD CNG vehicles.

18) CONTRACTOR agrees to exert renewed efforts to assure that other requirements of the base contract are being met, including the timely arrival of qualified service personnel and the expeditious repair of any deficiencies. 30

19) CONTRACTOR and YCTD shall mutually determine and set the price per GGE at the public dispenser. Additionally, both parties may mutually determine and set discount prices, if applicable, to third party consumers that fuel multiple vehicles at the public dispenser. At no time will Trillium be required to sell fuel to third parties at a loss.

20) WEIGHTS AND MEASURES. CONTRACTOR shall, at CONTRACTOR’s expense, have the public station dispenser tested and certified for Weights and Measures compliance by the Yolo County Agricultural Commissioner, or his/her designee, at an interval that meets all legal requirements.

Exhibit I Trillium CNG Proposal (Dated June 17, 2017)

Current CNG System

As requested by the District, Trillium CNG is providing Yolo County Transportation District (YCTD) with a proposal to upgrade the CNG equipment at the District’s Woodland, California CNG Refueling Station. Currently, YCTD and the public customers rely on CNG compression coming from two (2) compressors, with each one producing 5.6 GGE (Gasoline Gallon Equivalent) per minute for a total of 11.2 GGE per minute.

However, this CNG flow is currently being split between the back-lot dispensers for YCTD bus fueling and the public dispensers, resulting in CNG flow rates significantly below 11.2 GGE per minute. The current CNG system simply cannot meet the increasing station demand resulting from more public fueling customers without negatively impacting YCTD’s back-lot fueling experience.

Trillium is presenting below the following to upgrade the current CNG system in order to improve the overall station performance, given the growing need for CNG by both YCTD’s back-lot fleet and public customers.

Installation of a Third 275 HP Ariel Compressor, Dryer, and Valve Panel

Trillium Engineering Team’s in-depth analysis and evaluation of the current CNG system led to the conclusion that adding a third compressor to the current system is the most effective way to handle the need for additional throughput without any added constraints to YCTD or the public customers. In order to support a third compressor, upgrades to the gas dryer and station valve panel are also necessary which would maximize the benefit of a third compressor addition.

YCTD Current and Post-Upgrade Capacity The proposed three compressor configuration would be capable of increasing combined flow rates from 11.2 GGE per minute up to 16.9 GGE per minute and will enable the District to experience an uninterrupted fueling window for YCTD’s buses while still obtaining the throughputs necessary to allow the public to fuel concurrently without restrictions on station availability or flow rates.

Trillium CNG: The single source provider of CNG fueling facility design, construction, operation and maintenance.

Equipment Upgrade Advantages

Change Benefit

The recommended new 275 HP Ariel compressor will compress gas from suction to 4500 psi at a rate of approximately 6 GGE per minute. The new New Ariel Compressor compressor will work in parallel with the existing compressors to provide a total station flow rate of up to 16.9 GGE per minute. The existing station dryer is not sized to support the additional flow from a third compressor. The proposed low pressure desiccant dryer has a much more effective process of removing moisture and New Desiccant Single Tower Dryer requires less maintenance than the current equipment. The new desiccant single tower dryer will be sized to dry the gas for the new compressor and the two existing compressors eliminating the existing high pressure tower dryer. The new valve panel will be able to divert the gas flow between the public and back-lot dispensers to support YCTD’s fueling needs and the ever increasing throughput requirements on the public side. The new valve panel will allow for the existing compressors, the new third compressor, and storage to be directed between the public and back-lot dispensers. For example, one of the existing compressors and the new compressor will New Valve Panel be directed to flow CNG to the back-lot dispenser and the other existing compressor will be directed to the public dispenser. Doing so, YCTD will experience a flow rate of approximately 11-12 GGE per minute regardless of the public fueling demand. The public will experience flow rates of approximately 5.6 GGE per minute from a single compressor with the possibility of greater flows when YCTD’s buses are not fueling.

Trillium CNG: The single source provider of CNG fueling facility design, construction, operation and maintenance.

Current vs Upgraded Equipment Throughput

Capacity in SCFM GGE Per Minute Current 1,460 11.2 Upgraded 2,200 16.9 Post-Upgrade Percentage 50% 50% Increase

Station Upgrade Price Breakdown and Schedule

The price for the proposed equipment upgrade to add a third compressor, a new valve panel, and a new desiccant dryer is $1,009,900. This price includes Engineering, Permitting, Installation, and Commissioning associated with the proposed upgrade.

Service Cost Engineering, Programming & Project Management $ 80,211 Permitting, Controls & Networking $ 55,769 New 275 HP Ariel Compressor $ 325,285 New Valve Panel & Electrical Gear $ 142,093 New Gas Dryer $ 138,557 Installation & Commissioning $ 267,984 Grand Total (sales tax included) $ 1,009,900

This upgrade option is estimated to take 29 weeks for completion. In addition, the existing main breaker will need to be upgraded in order to accommodate for the installation of a new compressor. This upgrade will consist of replacing the existing main 1,600 AMP breaker, rated at 80 percent, with another 1,600 AMP breaker, rated at 100 percent, to accommodate the new compressor load.

Trillium CNG: The single source provider of CNG fueling facility design, construction, operation and maintenance.

Please note that Trillium is open to further discussion of options to finance the project on a per- therm basis by adjusting YCTD’s current O&M agreement. If YCTD expresses a desire to proceed with this upgrade and finance it through updated O&M rates, Trillium will provide the District with an updated O&M pricing schedule.

Trillium CNG: The single source provider of CNG fueling facility design, construction, operation and maintenance.

Exhibit J Safety & Inspection by Fuel Solutions (Dated February 4, 2016)

Analysis of Costs for Third Skid: Proposal from Trillium vs. Independent Cost Analysis

Independent February Analysis January 2016 Adjusted June 2016 Independent for Permits 2017 Proposal Analysis and PPI Proposal

Engineering, Programming & Project Management $ 74,883 $ 80,211 7.1% Producer Price Index by Commodity for Machinery and Equipment: Pumps, Compressors, and Equipment Permitting, Controls & Networking $ 54,469 $ 55,769 2.4% New 275 HP Ariel Compressor $ 319,538 $ 325,285 1.8% May, 2017 250.00 1.8% New Valve Panel & Electrical Gear $ 143,747 $ 142,093 -1.2% Dec, 2015 245.60 New Gas Dryer $ 136,164 $ 138,557 1.8% Installation & Commissioning $ 261,199 $ 267,985 2.6% Grand Total (sales tax included) $ 990,000 $ 914,211 $ 986,034 $ 1,009,900 2.0% 8.3% 2.4% higher than higher than estimate adjusted estimate Fuel Solutions February 2016 Note that the independent Cost Analysis did not include a line item for permitting. Independent Taking that into account, the project cost is within 3.1% of the independent cost analysis. Analysis Mechanical Equipment/Work $ 396,450 Electrical Equipment $ 52,350 Civil Work $ 20,400 Contractor Labor $ 44,000 Contractor equipment $ 18,000 Shipping, testing and startup $ 16,000 Engineering $ 70,000 Contractor markups $ 117,747 Date 7/11/2017 Rural/travel site costs $ 2,520 1/30/2018 Profit $ 55,775 Contingency $ 55,527 Sales Tax $ 65,442 $ 914,211

ESTIMATED LOAN TERMS TO FINANCE THIRD SKID

Number of Years 9 10 11 12 15 Total Number of Payments 18 20 22 24 30 Total Principal $ 1,159,900 $ 1,159,900 $ 1,159,900 $ 1,159,900 $ 1,159,900 Issuance, Other Fees $ 28,998 $ 28,998 $ 28,998 $ 28,998 $ 28,998 Total Loan $ 1,188,898 $ 1,188,898 $ 1,188,898 $ 1,188,898 $ 1,188,898 Payments/year $ (162,111) $ (148,950) $ (138,217) $ (129,305) $ (109,853) Interest % Rate 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% 4.50% Total Payments $ (1,459,003) $ (1,489,500) $ (1,520,387) $ (1,551,660) $ (1,647,788) Cost of Loan $ (270,105) $ (300,603) $ (331,489) $ (362,763) $ (458,891) 22.7% 25.3% 27.9% 30.5% 38.6%

ESTIMATED LOAN RE-PAYMENT CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THIRD-PARTY CNG SALES

Number of Years 9 10 11 12 15 Total Loan $ 1,188,898 $ 1,188,898 $ 1,188,898 $ 1,188,898 $ 1,188,898 Current Annual Consumption Levels

Current Third Party Sales GGEs 290,165 290,165 290,165 290,165 290,165 Third Party Capital Contrib per Year $ 46,426 $ 46,426 $ 46,426 $ 46,426 $ 46,426

YCTD share of annual payment $ 115,685 $ 102,524 $ 91,791 $ 82,879 $ 63,426 % from Third Party 28.6% 31.2% 33.6% 35.9% 42.3%

Waste Management & Other Firms Waste Mgmt Forecast GGEs 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 300,000 Other Third Party GGEs 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 360,000 360,000 360,000 360,000 360,000 Third Party Capital Contrib per Year $ 57,600 $ 57,600 $ 57,600 $ 57,600 $ 57,600

YCTD share of annual payment $ 104,511 $ 91,350 $ 80,617 $ 71,705 $ 52,253 % from Third Party 35.5% 38.7% 41.7% 44.5% 52.4%

BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776----(530) 661-0816 Topic: Agenda Item#: Consider Proposed Steps to Be Included in Smart 8 Phone Fare Pre-payment Agenda Type: Deliberation/Action* Program Hosted by Sacramento RT Attachments: Yes No Prepared By: Mike Luken Approved By: Meeting Date: July 10, 2017

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Yolo County Transportation District Board of Directors authorize the Executive Director to take the steps necessary to negotiate a proposed agreement or Memorandum of Understanding with Sacramento Regional Transit District to include YCTD in a regional mobile (Smart Phone) ticket program. REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: Sacramento Regional Transit District implemented a successful pilot project for mobile ticketing in their system. SacRT then completed a procurement for a mobile ticketing app for their District and surrounding transit districts. BACKGROUND: On July 15, 2017, the Connect Card Project was implemented after years of effort to combine the fare systems of nine transit agencies in the Sacramento region into one plastic card that can be used on all of those systems. The implementation is proceeding with riders converting to the Connect Card, corporate accounts coming online for both public and private organizations. Although the consortium is working out issues during these first months of full implementation, the Connect Card is moving quickly toward full incorporation of many riders throughout the region. During the last few years of bringing the Connect Card online, new technologies have been developed and implemented across the nation that use mobile phone apps for fare payment. Sacramento RT successfully completed a pilot project that created a great demand of its riders for this even newer technology. Demand was even created on Yolobus whereby our riders demanded use of the mobile ticketing app as soon as possible. Following the pilot project, Sacramento RT solicited proposals from firms interested in full implementation of a mobile ticketing app. This procurement included the ability to add other regional transit agencies. The firm Bytemark of New York was chosen as the top ranked firm in this procurement and an agreement was executed between Bytemark and Sacramento RT (See Attached Project Plan). Bytemark has implemented their mobile ticketing technology in a number of communities around the world. In their proposal, Bytemark would provide a customized mobile app for the Sacramento Region that a rider could load onto his or her smart phone. The app would then allow the rider to select a transit provider participating in the program. The rider would be guided to a list of fare products customized by each transit agency that the rider could purchase for use on their phone. When boarding the bus, the rider would then show a uniquely recognizable screen demonstrating that they had purchased the appropriate ticket to ride that particular bus and route. The user will also be able to manage his or her account via a secure website. Bytemark would provide a turnkey mobile ticketing product. In contrast to the Connect Card that is managed by Sacramento RT, the mobile ticketing system would be housed entirely on Amazon Web Servers with business continuity and disaster recovery capability. Bytemark’s merchant service provider, will ensure that all transactions are validated, providing protection for transit agencies and riders. Initially the mobile ticketing app will require driver recognition of the mobile ticket on a smart phone. RT and Bytemark staff are investigating whether in later phases of the project whether Connect Card equipment could be 47

modified to scan the mobile ticket for verification. At this point in time, adding new scanning equipment to buses is cost prohibitive. Mobile ticketing apps programs in Portland, Seattle and other locations started and continue to operate using driver recognition. Staff recommends approval of the recommended action as this type of technology will improve the rider experience and will likely result in a corresponding modest level of increased ridership. BUDGET IMPACT: The estimated total cost for the Mobile App for all jurisdictions is shown below. YCTD would be responsible for a yet to be determined portion of the following: 1. The fixed rate of $100,000 for development and initial deployment of the application will be paid as follows: (a) $75,000 upon Contract execution and $2,500 per month for each of the 36 months of the Contract term, paid in arrears. 2. The consortium will pay $2,500 per month, in arrears, for support, maintenance and hosting of the mobile ticketing system. 3. The consortium will pay a fixed transaction commission of 2% of the value of transaction, billed monthly based on the total fares processed. 4. The consortium will pay for merchant service provider services based on (1) the interchange rates and any other fees charged by credit card associations that are directly traceable to Yolobus transactions and not a general cost of consultant doing business; and (2) a fee imposed by the Bytemark of $0.076 per transaction. These fees will be directly deducted from credit card transactions prior to remittance to Yolobus. Sacramento Regional Transit analyzed the proposed fees based upon other region’s implementation of this type of technology. Based upon this research RT and District staff confirmed that this fee is very reasonable and frankly below the cost in fees being changed in other metropolitan areas. The proposed costs of this program could be funded out of the contingency remaining for the Connect Card that is not allocated for other purposes. If this is not the case, staff will return to the Board for a budget amendment to cover the costs of the implementation of the proposed mobile fare app. YCTD would negotiate its fair share of the fees shown above in a similar manner of the Connect Card and the existing transfer agreement with Sacramento RT. Staff would return to the Board with a recommendation at the August meeting.

BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776----(530) 661-0816 Topic: Agenda Item#: Review proposed scope of work for 9 Countywide Agenda Type: Deliberation/Action* Transportation Capital Improvement Program(CTCIP) Attachments: Yes No Prepared By: Mike Luken Approved By: Meeting Date: July 10, 2017

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Yolo County Transportation District Board of Directors review and provide direction on a Subcommittee Charge, proposed approach and draft scope of work for the Countywide Transportation Capital Improvement Program (CTCIP). REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: In June, the Board of Directors appointed a subcommittee of the Board to work with staff to develop a Countywide Transportation Capital Improvement Program (CTCIP). The first step of this process is the preparation of a scope of work for the proposed work program to complete the CTCIP. BACKGROUND: At the June meeting staff approved a set of recommendations to reengage the preparation of a CTCIP following the successful elections for sales tax measures in West Sacramento and Woodland and the passage of Senate Bill 1 at the State to fund transportation projects (See copy of last month’s report attached). The CTCIP Subcommittee of Don Saylor, Xochitl Rodriguez and Matt Dulcich met with Terry Bassett, Mike Luken and Taro Echiburu on July 7th to discuss the Subcommittee’s charge, an approach and scope of work for the proposed project. Staff has drafted a charge for the subcommittee based upon the input of the Subcommittee on July 7th as follows: Countywide Transportation Capital Improvement Plan (CTCIP) Subcommittee Charge The Subcommittee will provide Staff and the Technical Advisory Committee feedback on the scope of work and at key points of the work program for completion of the CTCIP, enabling staff to prepare a draft plan suitable for consideration of the cities, Board of Supervisors and the full YCTD Board of Directors.

One of the difficulties of completing a countywide plan is developing a framework of collaboration on projects that many times can only be seen from a particular jurisdiction’s prospective. Staff recommends what may be needed is a method of supporting projects which collectively can meet countywide goals but also compete better at SACOG and at the State and Federal levels that involve multiple jurisdictions within Yolo County. Staff proposed using a “Corridor Approach” for transportation planning employed at a state or regional level in Yolo County. Examples of this these corridors could be: 1. Intra County Agricultural Corridors a. Pacific Coast Producers – Knights Landing-County Road 102-Woodland b. Bogle Winery – West Sacramento – Highway 84/Jefferson Blvd/US Highway 50 2. Inter County Trade Corridors a. Rice Growing Areas – Port of West Sacramento b. I-5, US-50, i-80 67

3. Employment Corridors a. Seed Research Facilities-State Highway 16-City of Woodland b. County Road 31 – UC Davis/Yolo County c. I-5, US-50, i-80 4. Agriculture & Tourism Corridors a. I-505 to Cache Creek Casino b. State Highway 128-Winters-Berryessa-Napa 5. Emergency/Access Corridors a. County Road 22 – Woodland to West Sacramento/Woodland to Sacramento Alternate b. County Road 32 – Davis/UPRR/Landfill

6. Public Health Corridors a. Davis/Woodland/West Sacramento Access to County Landfill b. Winters to Sutter Davis Hospital, Winters to Vacaville Kaiser c. Bay-Delta Trail 7. Other Corridors Using the model of the recently approved Yolo County Integrated Groundwater Management Plan, staff proposes the following scope of work for the project using the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). 1. Development of Draft Countywide Transportation Goals and Objectives (August)* 2. Development of Corridor-Based System for Project Implementation (September)* 3. Revise and Update draft list of High Priority/Significant Transportation Projects (October) 4. Incorporate High Priority Transportation Projects into Corridor Based Framework (October)* 5. Complete Draft CTCIP (November)* 6. Consideration of Draft CTCIP by Yolo Manager’s Group (December) 7. Consideration of Draft CTCIP by City Councils/Board of Supervisors/YCTD Board (January) * - notes CTCIP subcommittee meets following the corresponding TAC Meeting BUDGET IMPACT: None

BOARD COMMUNICATIONS: YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776----(530) 661-0816 Topic: Agenda Item#: Review 2016-2017 Yolo County Grand 10 Jury Report District Agenda Type: Deliberation/Action* Recommendation regarding Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan Attachments: Yes No Prepared By: Mike Luken Approved By: Meeting Date: July 10, 2017

RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Yolo County Transportation District Board of Directors review and provide direction on a 2017 Yolo County Grand Jury Report regarding activities of the District and the Yolo County Bicycle Master Plan. REASON FOR RECOMMENDATION: Annually, the Yolo County Grand Jury studies issues throughout the County and makes recommendations for public agencies to take action related to activities of which they are involved. This year they have made recommendations related to the Yolo County Bicycle Transportation Plan. BACKGROUND: The 2017 Grand Jury (YCGJ) Report was published on June 30, 2017 (for the entire document see http://www.yolocounty.org/business/community/grand-jury/yolo-county-grand-jury-reports ). One of the items of interest to the YCGJ was whether adequate attention was being paid to biking safety and biking-related facilities. According to the Report, biking accidents happening in the recent past prompted the YCGJ's concern for a bicycle safety review.

Specifically Finding R1 of the 2016-2017 Grand Jury report recommends:

By January 2018, the Yolo County Transportation Advisory Committee and the Yolo County Transportation District shall host, at least twice yearly, a meeting of organizations and local governments to share implementation hurdles, ideas for funding, coordination of priorities and resources, and possible ballot initiatives or legislation to enhance similar goals and revenue as they relate to the Plan.

The Yolo County Transportation Advisory Committee which is referred to by the YCGJ Report is staffed by the Yolo County Public Works Department and covers the unincorporated portion of the County only. As the reports requests input from all of the Cities and the County, a better venue might be the Yolo County Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) which contains representatives from the County, YCTD, Unitrans, Yolo-Solano AQMD and the four cities. This item could be added to the TAC agenda two times per year as recommended by the YCGJ.

BUDGET IMPACT: None

BOARD COMMUNICATION: YOLO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION DISTRICT 350 Industrial Way, Woodland, CA 95776---- (530) 661-0816 Topic: Agenda Item #: Consider Director’s 11 Report Agenda Type: Deliberation/Action*

Attachments: Yes No

Prepared By: Approved By: Meeting Date: July 10, 2017 Terry Bassett, Mike Luken RECOMMENDATION: The following are updates to your board regarding various YCTD matters. Specific recommended actions from staff are highlighted with an asterisk. Your Board also reserves the right to take action on all items below, with the exception of oral report items. BACKGROUND: a) Oral Report b) Autonomous Shuttle Vehicle Display Event by Transdev - Transdev and YCTD Staff will be participating in an event on Tuesday, July 11, 2017, at 11:30 am, where an autonomous shuttle bus seating six, with standing room for another six passengers, will be on display and demonstrated (see http://easymile.com for more information on the vehicle). This will be your board’s first opportunity to see the prototype which may serve a role in future neighborhood shuttles. Board members received an invite directly from the City of West Sacramento for this event. Entry to the event will be via 5th Street in West Sacramento just south of the ballpark. The event itself will be in the “red” parking lot in the upper northeast corner of the Raley Field Parking lots. Please RSVP to the City of West Sacramento invite. c) Status of West Sacramento On-Demand Transit Service RFP - Transdev and YCTD submitted a proposal for the on-demand service to West Sacramento in early July. The City is currently shortlisting teams for interviews. We will be notified shortly in the Transdev/YCTD team was selected to move forward with an interview for the pilot project. d) Update on Other CNG Matters

i. PG&E Pipeline Work—During June20-23rd PG&E successfully provided natural gas to YCTD, using liquefied natural gas trailers while PG&E replaced and upgraded a natural gas pipeline on Main Street in Woodland. A great amount of planning effort was undertaken to coordinate this work, which included 24/7 staffing of the LNG trailers by PG&E personnel. Operations are now back to normal and PG&E’s pipeline related work on Main Street is nearly complete.

ii. Troubleshooting and Removing Oil in CNG Buses—Staff noticed that the extra oil found in the fuel system of several YCTD buses has the same composition as the oil used in part of Trillium’s gas compression equipment, specifically, what is called a hydraulic intensifier. If this is verified, Trillium has pledged to work with YCTD to make any necessary CNG compressor equipment repairs to reduce the amount of such fluids that have been found in YCTD’s low pressure fuel filter area. e) Attachment Ridership Report through May 31, 2017 79

YolobusYolobus FixedFixed RouteRoute RidershipRidership TrendsTrends -11.3% YTD 14-1514-15 15-1615-16 16-1716-17 -10.6% YTD

160,000160,000 --13.9%13.9% --14.6%14.6% -5.6% -9.7% - -5.6% -9.7% - -9.2% 140,000140,000 -6.1% -14.4% -17.7% -14.1% -6.1% -5.7% --13.4%13.4% 120,000120,000

100,000100,000

Riders 80,000

60,00060,000

40,00040,000

20,00020,000

00 JulJul AugAug SeptSept OctOct NovNov DecDec JanJan FebFeb MarMar AprApr MayMay JunJun

Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Totals YTD 16-17 112,902 128,174 124,845 121,920 115,050 102,071 102,026 103,980 117,263 107,734 114,140 1,250,105 -11.3% 15-16 132,193 135,789 138,295 141,590 122,545 117,814 119194 126,278 129,160 125,400 121,025 115,313 1,524,596 14-15 137,804 144,667 146,394 151,630 129,251 124,534 132,042 128,155 137,076 133,274 128,879 124,030 1,617,736 13-14 145,240 150,145 147,925 159,624 135,001 128,789 138,830 134,193 140,902 146,288 142,987 127,081 1,697,005 12-13 136,029 152,771 141,712 158,319 138,423 122,854 138,422 138,245 144,978 143,474 145,716 129,271 1,690,214 11-12 125,846 143,688 140,150 142,995 134,523 124,528 137,741 143,683 147,795 139,652 145,890 131,767 1,658,258 10-11 140,034 143,616 136,714 139,815 130,272 118,877 133,058 130,088 141,582 141,200 140,848 132,082 1,628,186 09-10 144,651 141,258 144,049 150,809 132,730 125,460 133,705 136,346 148,367 140,109 136,272 132,315 1,666,071 08-09 160,580 161,041 158,082 168,903 143,478 140,487 153,123 138,164 152,247 147,277 144,946 140,563 1,808,891 07-08 159,817 155,510 152,555 163,369 138,675 136,205 148,057 133,631 147,265 142,604 140,421 136,372 1,754,481 06-07 122,800 126,074 114,147 127,610 116,009 106,480 116,214 117,959 124,535 134,526 138,991 140,437 1,485,782 05-06 106,044 121,542 111,262 118,112 107,259 101,906 114,092 105,096 123,411 115,029 122,358 116,621 1,362,732 04-05 107,150 117,018 108,890 112,076 103,828 95,674 107,599 101,379 113,837 105,354 118,847 115,748 1,307,400 03-04 105,206 106,152 104,410 103,943 97,488 95,852 99,008 96,068 106,015 105,685 105,309 105,176 1,230,312 02-03 108,939 103,488 101,711 108,467 92,480 89,168 92,516 89,648 106,759 101,867 102,835 103,819 1,201,697 01-02 112,889 111,782 105,554 114,277 97,067 92,461 101,652 95,307 106,049 104,030 106,669 101,146 1,248,883 00-01 117,273 121,631 108,539 118,293 106,027 96,291 105,754 98,203 105,663 109,432 113,032 103,519 1,303,657

-14.6% -5.6% -9.7% -13.9% -6.1% -13.4% -14.4% -17.7% -9.2% -14.1% -5.7%

Yolobus Special Paratransit (ADA) Ridership Trends

14-15 15-16 16-17 -2.6%9.2% YTD 3,500

3,000 -20.6% +4.0% +13.1% -19.3% --8.4% +0.7%+0.7% +0.8% -16.7% -23.2% -16.7% -22.2% 2,500 --3.6%

2,000

Riders 1,500 Riders 1,500

1,000

500

0 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun

Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Totals YTD 16-17 2,318 2,604 2,379 2,400 2,210 2,051 1,956 1,990 2,292 2,146 2,650 24,996 -9.2% 15-16 2,530 2,302 2,363 2,382 2,292 2,463 2,515 2,590 2,886 2,659 2,547 2,550 30,079 14-15 2,183 2,114 2,195 2,487 2,086 2,187 2,240 2,359 2,553 2,693 2,627 2,598 28,322 13-14 2,023 2,026 1,985 2,074 1,887 1,821 1,974 1,735 2,046 2,169 2,350 2,236 24,326 12-13 1,798 2,005 1,761 2,181 1,930 1,792 2,050 1,764 1,975 2,248 2,035 1,845 23,384 11-12 1,422 1,554 1,507 1,479 1,425 1,346 1,452 1,441 1,677 1,577 1,791 1,648 18,319 10-11 1,399 1,435 1,471 1,443 1,288 1,346 1,396 1,382 1,557 1,515 1,519 1,530 17,281 09-10 1,447 1,326 1,349 1,306 1,260 1,292 1,273 1,265 1,414 1,334 1,310 1,341 15,917 08-09 1,504 1,465 1,606 1,667 1,341 1,531 1,590 1,582 1,701 1,415 1,378 1,444 18,224 07-08 1,456 1,640 1,276 1,478 1,272 1,275 1,283 1,300 1,344 1,467 1,491 1,368 16,650

-8.4% 13.1% 0.7% 0.8% -3.6% -16.7% -22.2% -23.2% -20.6% -19.3% 4.0%