DOCSLIB.ORG

Aklavik Community Conservation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aklavik Community Conservation Plan AKLAVIK INUVIALUIT COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN AKAQVIKMIUT NUNAMIKINI NUNUTAILIVIKAUTINICH A PLAN FOR THE CONSERVATION AND MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LANDS WITHIN THE INUVIALUIT SETTLEMENT REGION IN THE VICINITY OF AKLAVIK, NORTHWEST TERRITORIES Prepared by The Aklavik Hunters and Trappers Committee, Aklavik Community Corporation, the Wildlife Management Advisory Council (NWT), the Fisheries Joint Management Committee and the Joint Secretariat 2016 We thank the elders who made this possible by telling us about the Inuvialuit lifestyle of long ago which in many ways continues today. This plan will help preserve our lifestyle into the future. June 2000 “Conservation means the protection of wildlife and their land and also the keeping of traditional subsistence lifestyle. Wise planning based on traditional and scientific knowledge should be used to conserve and manage wildlife and wildlife habitat.” -Mervin Joe and Joe Joe Benoit Aklavik, 1993 2016 The 2016 Aklavik Inuvialuit Community Conservation Plan has been prepared in consultation with the Inuvialuit Community in Aklavik and Inuvialuit and non-Inuvialuit bodies with an interest in the area. The undersigned representatives hereby adopt this document for the purpose of guiding policy and resource management in the planning area. Dean Arey Larry Carpenter President Chair Aklavik Hunters and Trappers Committee Wildlife Management Advisory Council (NWT) Jordan McLeod Chairperson Lindsay Staples Aklavik Community Corporation Chair Wildlife Management Advisory Council (North Slope) Annie B. Gordon Chairperson Aklavik Inuvialuit Elders Committee Vic Gillman Chair Fisheries Joint Management Committee IMPORTANT DEFINITIONS AND ABBREVIATIONS The following important words and abbreviations have been used in the Community Conservation Plan and are explained below. Community Refers to all the Inuvialuit individuals living in the area and the local organizations that represent them. Those organizations include the Hunters and Trappers Committee, Elders, Community Corporation, Community Education Council and Hamlet. Conservation Is ensuring that if we take caribou, there will be caribou the next year and the year after that. The same for anything else. This applies to all uses of the land: if it is used and enjoyed now, it must be left and preserved so that it will be there for the next year and for future years. Ecosystem Refers to all of the plants and animals in an area, including the air, water and land on which they depend. The parts of the ecosystem are interconnected and influence one another. Food and energy flow through the ecosystem and are returned to it. Successful conservation and management depend on the recognition that changing one part of the ecosystem may affect the other parts. AHTC - Aklavik Hunters and Trappers Committee ACC - Aklavik Community Corporation CWS - Canadian Wildlife Service DFO - Department of Fisheries and Oceans DoL – Department of Lands, GNWT DOT - Department of Transportation ENR - Department of Environment and Natural Resources, GNWT EIRB - Environmental Impact Review Board EISC - Environmental Impact Screening Committee FJMC - Fisheries Joint Management Committee GNWT - Government of the Northwest Territories GRRB - Gwich’in Renewable Resource Board GTC - Gwich’in Tribal Council HTC - Hunters and Trappers Committee IFA - Inuvialuit Final Agreement IGC - Inuvialuit Game Council ILA - Inuvialuit Land Administration IRC - Inuvialuit Regional Corporation ISR - Inuvialuit Settlement Region ITH – Inuvik to Tuktoyaktuk Highway ITI – Department of Industry, Tourism and Investment, GNWT NWT - Northwest Territories PWNHC - Prince of Wales Northern Heritage Centre RRC - Renewable Resource Committee (Gwich’in) WMAC (NS) - Wildlife Management Advisory Council (North Slope) WMAC (NWT) - Wildlife Management Advisory Council (Northwest Territories) YTG - Yukon Territorial Government Aklavik Inuvialuit Community Conservation Plan - 2016 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 7 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................ 11 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 12 1.1 A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE AKLAVIK AREA ................................................................ 15 1.2 INUVIALUIT FINAL AGREEMENT AND RENEWABLE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 17 1.2.1 Inuvialuit Final Agreement .................................................................................... 17 1.2.2 Wildlife Management Advisory Councils (NWT and North Slope) and Fisheries Joint Management Committee ............................................................... 17 1.2.3 Inuvialuit Game Council and Hunters and Trappers Committees .......................... 17 1.2.4 Inuvialuit Land Administration ............................................................................... 17 1.2.5 Environmental Impact Screening Committee and Environmental Impact Review Board .................................................................... 18 1.3 GWICH’IN TRANSBOUNDARY ISSUES .................................................................... 18 2 COMMUNITY VALUES ..................................................................................................... 19 3 GOALS ............................................................................................................................. 19 4 SPECIAL AREAS AND RECOMMENDED LAND USE PRACTICES FOR THE PLANNING AREA ....................................................................................................................................... 21 4.1 AKLAVIK SUBREGION - SPECIAL DESIGNATED LANDS ......................................... 22 4.1.1 General Land Use Guidelines ............................................................................... 85 4.2 INUVIALUIT COMMUNITY PROCESS FOR LAND USE DECISIONS .......................... 85 4.3 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS MANAGEMENT................................................................... 86 4.4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCREENING AND REVIEW ......................................................... 87 4.4.1 Recommendations ............................................................................................... 87 5 EDUCATION, TRAINING AND INFORMATION EXCHANGE .......................................... 88 6 WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH ................................................................. 89 6.1 GENERAL GUIDELINES............................................................................................. 90 6.2 SUBSISTENCE AND COMMERCIAL HARVESTING - GENERAL GUIDELINES ......... 92 6.3 TOURISM GUIDELINES (NWT) .................................................................................. 92 6.4 SPECIES CONSERVATION SUMMARIES ................................................................. 93 Beaver ............................................................................................................................ 95 Black Bear ...................................................................................................................... 96 Caribou .......................................................................................................................... 97 Dall's Sheep ................................................................................................................. 100 Foxes ........................................................................................................................... 102 Grizzly Bear ................................................................................................................. 102 Lynx.............................................................................................................................. 104 Marten.......................................................................................................................... 106 Mink ............................................................................................................................. 107 Muskox ........................................................................................................................ 110 Muskrat ........................................................................................................................ 112 Polar Bear .................................................................................................................... 113 Snowshoe Hare or Rabbit ............................................................................................ 116 Wolf ............................................................................................................................. 117 Wolverine ..................................................................................................................... 118 Beluga Whale ............................................................................................................... 119 Bowhead Whale ........................................................................................................... 126 6 Aklavik Inuvialuit Community Conservation Plan - 2016 Seals ............................................................................................................................ 130 Mammals Species List ................................................................................................. 136 Ducks
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Public Update: March 23, 2020 Current Procedure
    PUBLIC UPDATE: MARCH 23, 2020 Over the weekend, Town Administration, Staff, & Leadership have been involved in extensive communication and planning with our regional Government of the Northwest Territories personnel and administration. While we are responding to the evolving situation, our main focus has been on our procedure to how Inuvik will receive, monitor, house, & feed those returning to Inuvik from one of the smaller regional communities or those who do not have an adequate space at home to fulfill the requirements for the 14 days of required self-isolation. As you are now aware, the Chief Health Officer and the Government of the Northwest Territories now requires every person entering the Territory (including residents) to self-isolate for 14 days. Further to this, the GNWT requires those required to self-isolate to do so in one of the larger designated centres: Hay River, Yellowknife, Inuvik or Fort Smith. CURRENT PROCEDURE FOR THOSE ENTERING INUVIK BY ROAD OR BY AIR All persons returning to Inuvik from outside the Territory, by road or by air are now being screened at the point of entry. Whether you enter Inuvik via the Dempster Highway or the Inuvik Airport, you will be screened and directed in the following ways: 1. If you have not already, you are required to complete and submit a self-isolation plan to the GNWT. Link to Self-Isolation Plan Form Here. 2. If you are an Inuvik resident and are able to self-isolate at home, you will be directed to proceed directly to your home and stay there for the 14-day duration following all protocols as required by the Chief Health Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Inuvialuit For
    D_156905_inuvialuit_Cover 11/16/05 11:45 AM Page 1 UNIKKAAQATIGIIT: PUTTING THE HUMAN FACE ON CLIMATE CHANGE PERSPECTIVES FROM THE INUVIALUIT SETTLEMENT REGION UNIKKAAQATIGIIT: PUTTING THE HUMAN FACE ON CLIMATE CHANGE PERSPECTIVES FROM THE INUVIALUIT SETTLEMENT REGION Workshop Team: Inuvialuit Regional Corporation (IRC), Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami (ITK), International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD), Centre Hospitalier du l’Université du Québec (CHUQ), Joint Secretariat: Inuvialuit Renewable Resource Committees (JS:IRRC) Funded by: Northern Ecosystem Initiative, Environment Canada * This workshop is part of a larger project entitled Identifying, Selecting and Monitoring Indicators for Climate Change in Nunavik and Labrador, funded by NEI, Environment Canada This report should be cited as: Communities of Aklavik, Inuvik, Holman Island, Paulatuk and Tuktoyaktuk, Nickels, S., Buell, M., Furgal, C., Moquin, H. 2005. Unikkaaqatigiit – Putting the Human Face on Climate Change: Perspectives from the Inuvialuit Settlement Region. Ottawa: Joint publication of Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami, Nasivvik Centre for Inuit Health and Changing Environments at Université Laval and the Ajunnginiq Centre at the National Aboriginal Health Organization. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Naitoliogak . 1 1.0 Summary . 2 2.0 Acknowledgements . 3 3.0 Introduction . 4 4.0 Methods . 4 4.1 Pre-Workshop Methods . 4 4.2 During the Workshop . 5 4.3 Summarizing Workshop Observations . 6 5.0 Observations. 6 5.1 Regional (Common) Concerns . 7 Changes to Weather: . 7 Changes to Landscape: . 9 Changes to Vegetation: . 10 Changes to Fauna: . 11 Changes to Insects: . 11 Increased Awareness And Stress: . 11 Contaminants: . 11 Desire For Organization: . 12 5.2 East-West Discrepancies And Patterns . 12 Changes to Weather .
    [Show full text]
  • Community Resistance Land Use And
    COMMUNITY RESISTANCE LAND USE AND WAGE LABOUR IN PAULATUK, N.W.T. by SHEILA MARGARET MCDONNELL B.A. Honours, McGill University, 1976 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Geography) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April 1983 G) Sheila Margaret McDonnell, 1983 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. Department of The University of British Columbia 1956 Main Mall Vancouver, Canada V6T 1Y3 DE-6 (3/81) ABSTRACT This paper discusses community resistance to the imposition of an external industrial socio-economic system and the destruction of a distinctive land-based way of life. It shows how historically Inuvialuit independence has been eroded by contact with the external economic system and the assimilationist policies of the government. In spite of these pressures, however, the Inuvialuit have struggled to retain their culture and their land-based economy. This thesis shows that hunting and trapping continue to be viable and to contribute significant income, both cash and income- in-kind to the community.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Food Program Use in Inuvik, Northwest Territories James D Ford1*, Marie-Pierre Lardeau1, Hilary Blackett2, Susan Chatwood2 and Denise Kurszewski2
    Ford et al. BMC Public Health 2013, 13:970 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/13/970 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Community food program use in Inuvik, Northwest Territories James D Ford1*, Marie-Pierre Lardeau1, Hilary Blackett2, Susan Chatwood2 and Denise Kurszewski2 Abstract Background: Community food programs (CFPs) provide an important safety-net for highly food insecure community members in the larger settlements of the Canadian Arctic. This study identifies who is using CFPs and why, drawing upon a case study from Inuvik, Northwest Territories. This work is compared with a similar study from Iqaluit, Nunavut, allowing the development of an Arctic-wide understanding of CFP use – a neglected topic in the northern food security literature. Methods: Photovoice workshops (n=7), a modified USDA food security survey and open ended interviews with CFP users (n=54) in Inuvik. Results: Users of CFPs in Inuvik are more likely to be housing insecure, female, middle aged (35–64), unemployed, Aboriginal, and lack a high school education. Participants are primarily chronic users, and depend on CFPs for regular food access. Conclusions: This work indicates the presence of chronically food insecure groups who have not benefited from the economic development and job opportunities offered in larger regional centers of the Canadian Arctic, and for whom traditional kinship-based food sharing networks have been unable to fully meet their dietary needs. While CFPs do not address the underlying causes of food insecurity, they provide an important service
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability in Iqaluit
    2014-2019 Iqaluit Sustainable Community Plan Part one Overview www.sustainableiqaluit.com ©2014, The Municipal Corporation of the City of Iqaluit. All Rights Reserved. The preparation of this sustainable community plan was carried out with assistance from the Green Municipal Fund, a Fund financed by the Government of Canada and administered by the Federation of Canadian Municipalities. Notwithstanding this support, the views expressed are the personal views of the authors, and the Federation of Canadian Municipalities and the Government of Canada accept no responsibility for them. Table of Contents Acknowledgements INTRODUCTION to Part One of the Sustainable Community Plan .........................................................2 SECTION 1 - Sustainability in Iqaluit ....................................................................................................3 What is sustainability? .............................................................................................................................. 3 Why have a Sustainable Community Plan? .............................................................................................. 3 Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit and sustainability .............................................................................................. 4 SECTION 2 - Our Context ....................................................................................................................5 Iqaluit – then and now .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Ethnohistorical Review of Health and Healing in Aklavik, NWT, Canada
    “Never Say Die”: An Ethnohistorical Review of Health and Healing in Aklavik, NWT, Canada by Elizabeth Cooper A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Department of Native Studies University of Manitoba Winnipeg Copyright © 2010 by Elizabeth Cooper Abstract The community of Aklavik, North West Territories, was known as the “Gateway to the North” throughout the first half of the Twentieth Century. In 1959, the Canadian Federal Government decided to relocate the town to a new location for a variety of economic and environmental reasons. Gwitch’in and Inuvialuit refused to move, thus claiming their current community motto “Never Say Die”. Through a series of interviews and participant observation with Elders in Aklavik and Inuvik, along with consultation of secondary literature and archival sources, this thesis examines ideas of the impact of mission hospitals, notions of health, wellness and community through an analysis of some of the events that transpired during this interesting period of history. Acknowledgements I would like to thank and honour the people in both Aklavik and Inuvik for their help and support with this project. I would like to thank my thesis committee, Dr. Christopher G Trott, Dr Emma LaRocque and Dr. Mark Rumel for their continued help and support throughout this project. I would like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council, Dr. S. Michelle Driedger’s Research in Science Communication CIHR-CFI Research Lab, University of Manitoba Graduate Studies, University of Manitoba Faculty of Arts, University of Manitoba, Department of Native Studies and University of Manitoba Graduate Students Association, for making both the research and dissemination of results for this project possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Harvest of Beluga Whales in Canada's Western Arctic: Hunter
    ARCTIC VOL. 55, NO. 1 (MARCH 2002) P. 10–20 The Harvest of Beluga Whales in Canada’s Western Arctic: Hunter-Based Monitoring of the Size and Composition of the Catch LOIS A. HARWOOD,1 PAMELA NORTON,2 BILLY DAY3 and PATRICIA A. HALL4 (Received 9 July 1998; accepted in revised form 23 May 2001) ABSTRACT. Hunter-based beluga monitoring programs, in place in the Mackenzie Delta since 1973 and in the Paulatuk, Northwest Territories, area since 1989, have resulted in collection of data on the number of whales harvested and on the efficiency of the hunts. Since 1980, data on the standard length, fluke width, sex, and age of the landed whales have also been collected. The number of belugas landed each year averaged 131.8 (SD 26.5, n = 1337) between 1970 and 1979, 124.0 (SD 23.3, n = 1240) between 1980 and 1989, and 111.0 (SD 19.0, n = 1110) between 1990 and 1999. The human population increased during this same period. Removal of belugas from the Beaufort Sea stock, including landed whales taken in the Alaskan harvests, is estimated at 189 per year. The sex ratio of landed belugas from the Mackenzie Estuary was 2.3 males:1 female. Median ages were 23.5 yr (47 growth layer groups [GLG]) for females (n = 80) and 24 yr (48 GLG) for males (n = 286). More than 92% of an aged sample (n = 368) from the harvest consisted of whales 10 or more years old (20 GLG). The rate of removal is small in relation to the expected maximum net productivity rate of this stock.
    [Show full text]
  • Arctic Show Trial
    Documents on Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security ARCTIC SHOW TRIAL The Trial of Alikomiak and Tatamigana, 1923 Introduced by Ken Coates and William R. Morrison Documents Compiled by P. Whitney Lackenbauer and Kristopher Kinsinger Documents on Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security (DCASS) ISSN 2368-4569 Series Editors: P. Whitney Lackenbauer Adam Lajeunesse Managing Editor: Ryan Dean Arctic Show Trial: The Trial of Alikomiak and Tatamigana, 1923 Introduced by Ken Coates and William R. Morrison Documents compiled by P. Whitney Lackenbauer and Kristopher Kinsinger DCASS Number #9, 2017 Cover design: Whitney Lackenbauer Cover credits: Glenbow Archives PA-3886-29-1 (front) and PA-3886-29-6 (back). Centre for Military, Security and Centre on Foreign Policy and Federalism Strategic Studies St. Jerome’s University University of Calgary 290 Westmount Road N. 2500 University Dr. N.W. Waterloo, ON N2L 3G3 Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Tel: 519.884.8110 ext. 28233 Tel: 403.220.4030 www.sju.ca/cfpf www.cmss.ucalgary.ca Arctic Institute of North America University of Calgary 2500 University Drive NW, ES-1040 Calgary, AB T2N 1N4 Tel: 403-220-7515 http://arctic.ucalgary.ca/ Copyright © the authors/editors, 2017 Permission policies are outlined on our website http://cmss.ucalgary.ca/research/arctic-document-series Arctic Show Trial: The Trial of Alikomiak and Tatamigana, 1923 Introduced by Ken Coates and William R. Morrison Documents compiled and edited by P. Whitney Lackenbauer and Kristopher Kinsinger The Trial of Alikomiak and Tatamigana Contents Foreword ............................................................................................................... viii Introduction “To Make These Tribes Understand”: The Trial of Alikomiak and Tatamigana, by Ken Coates and William R.
    [Show full text]
  • Priorities for Land Use and Development in the Northwest
    PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH BRIEF Priorities for Land Use and Development in the Northwest Territories Highlights from a telephone survey of NWT residents conducted November 4-9, 2015 for Ducks Unlimited by Ekos Research Public Opinion Brief: Priorities for Land Use and Development in the NWT - 2015 INTRODUCTION This research brief summarizes the results of a random digit dial telephone poll of NWT residents conducted for Ducks Unlimited Canada by the professional polling firm Ekos Research ​ ​ Associates. The poll interviewed a representative sample of 456 aboriginal and non-aboriginal residents by landline and cellphone November 4-9, 2015. A random sample of 456 is considered accurate to within ±4.59% 19 times out of 20. Interviews were carried out in communities across the region, including the following: Aklavik Fort Resolution Tsiigehtchic Behchokò Fort Simpson Tuktoyaktuk Colville Lake Fort Smith Tulita Déline Gamètì Ulukhaktok Enterprise Hay River Wekweètì Fort Good Hope Inuvik Whatì Fort Liard Lutselk'e Yellowknife Fort McPherson Norman Wells Fort Providence Paulatuk SURVEY FINDINGS Page 2 Public Opinion Brief: Priorities for Land Use and Development in the NWT - 2015 1. In the NWT today, cost of living and the environment are the issues foremost in the public mind, followed by economic development and jobs. To identify the issues most salient to the public, the first question on the survey asked NWT residents to name what they felt was the most important issues affecting the NWT, unaided, without prompting or pre-set answers. Results suggest that the top-of-mind issues for NWT residents are cost of living (24%) and the environment (20%), each eliciting more mentions than any other issue.
    [Show full text]
  • POKIAK Aklavik, Mackenzie Delta
    Nomination Form for Territorial Historic Sites POKIAK Aklavik, Mackenzie Delta Danny Lennie (?), Gordon Lennie or Ricky McLeod, Gordon McLeod, Tommy Adams, Mary Jane Lennie, Angus Lennie, Ricky McLeod and Netta Pringle in Pokiak, 1956 Photo credit: Gunther Abrahamson G Gwich'in Social & Cultural Institute Fort McPherson, NWT Nomination Form for Territorial Historic Sites MANDATORY INFORMATION What is the name of the site you are nominating? Pokiak Why are you nominating this site? Why is it important to the Northwest Territories? Pokiak is of great heritage value to the Northwest Territories because the site represents two separate and important identities: it is the original settlement of Aklavik, and it is an area where Gwich’in, Inuvialuit, Métis and others lived side by side. Additionally, several non-Natives resided there, generally those who had married into a local family. It was occupied from at least 1911 till the 1960s. It represents an important era in the Northwest Territories when immigration was adding to the already culturally diverse populations and changing the face of the north, and celebrates the multi-ethnic spirit of Aklavik, a major fur-trade social and economic centre. Pokiak also highlights and promotes understanding about its occupants – occupants that the normal historical literature often marginalizes. It celebrates a spirit of sharing, good times, and hard work fondly remembered by many Aklavik Elders. Does the site have a story? If so, what is it? Due to an increase in competition for trappers’ fur from whalers at Herschel Island where prices were substantially cheaper than at Fort McPherson, around the turn of the twentieth century the Hudson’s Bay Company post at Fort McPherson decided to set up another post in the delta.
    [Show full text]
  • The Characteristics of Some Permafrost Soils in The
    222 3.35 4 14 7 10 3.35 4 7 IO 14 I I, I 3.35 4 14 7 10 3.35 4 7 10 14 d-SPACING d-SPACING Fig. 1. X-ray dsractometer diagram of profile 2, the coarse clay (2.0 - 0.2~)fraction. Papers THE CHARACTERISTICS OF SOME PERMAFROST SOILS INTHE MACKENZIE VALLEY, N.W.T.* I J. H. Day and H. M. Rice* Introduction OILS in the tundra and subarctic regions of Canada were first described S in 1939 whenFeustel and others analyzed samples from northern Quebec, Keewatin and Franklin districts. More recently McMillan (1960), Beschel (1961) andLajoie (1954) describedsoils in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago and in northern Quebec. In the western part of the Northwest Territories only one profile (Leahey 1947) has been described under tundra vegetation, although other soils under forest, mostly unaffected by perma- frost,have been described (Leahey 1954, Dayand Leahey 1957, Wright et al. 1959). In Alaska, Tedrow and Hill (1955), Drew and Tedrow (1957), Tedrow et al. (1958),Douglas andTedrow (1960), Hill and Tedrow (1961) and Tedrow and Cantlon (1958) described several groups of soils, weathering processes, and concepts of soilformation and classification in thearctic environment. At least some of the kinds of soil they described in Alaska occur in Canada in a similar environment. This study was undertaken to investigate the characteristics of soils in a permafrost region under different typesof vegetation. The lower Mackenzie River valley is within the area of continuous permafrost (Brown 1960) and both tundra and boreal forest regions are readily accessible from the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Canadian Mounted Police
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. DOMINION OF CANADA .■ , I REPORT IIIIS- . •IIII ' OF THE ROYAL CANAOIAN MOUNTED POLICE FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1928 OTTAWA F. A. ACLAND PRINTER TO '111E KING'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY 1929 — , Przce, 80 cents DOMINION OF CANADA REPORT OF THE ROYAL CANADIAN MOUNTED POLICE FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1928 OTTAWA F.
    [Show full text]