Regular Covering Surfaces of Riemann Surfaces
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
17 on Mathematics in Finland
3 Preface The second volume of this little history traces events in and to some extent around mathematics in the period starting with the giants Newton and Leibniz. The selection among the multitude of possible topics is rather standard, with the exception of mathematics in Finland, which is exposed in much more detail than its relative importance would require. The reader may regard the treatment of Finland here as a case study of a small nation in the periphery of the scientific world. As in the first volume, I do not indicate my sources, nor do I list the literature which I have consulted. In defence of this omission I can refer to the general expository level of the presentation. Those willing to gain a deeper and more detailed insight in the various aspects of the history of mathematics will easily find a multitude of literary and internet sources to consult. Oulu, Finland, April 2009 Matti Lehtinen 4 CONTENTS About the LAIMA series ........................ 7 8 Newton and Leibniz ........................... 9 8.1 The binomial series ........................... 9 8.2 Newton’s differential and integral calculus ... 11 8.3 Leibniz ....................................... 15 9 The 18th century: rapid development of analysis .......................................... 21 9.1 The Bernoullis .............................. 21 9.2 18th century mathematics in Britain ......... 25 9.3 Euler .......................................... 27 9.4 Enlightenment mathematics in Italy and France 34 9.5 Lagrange .................................... 37 10 Mathematics at the time of the French Revolu- tion ................................................ 40 10.1 Monge and Ecole´ Polytechnique ............ 40 10.2 Fourier ....................................... 42 10.3 Laplace and Legendre ........................ 44 10.4 Gauss ....................................... 47 11 Analysis becomes rigorous in the 19th century 52 11.1 Cauchy and Bolzano ....................... -
Mathematics People
Mathematics People Machinery (ACM-SIGACT). This award is presented an- Arora and Mitchell Awarded nually, with the presentation taking place alternately at Gödel Prize the International Colloquium on Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP) and the ACM Symposium on Sanjeev Arora of Princeton University and Joseph Theory of Computing (STOC). The prize is named in honor S. B. Mitchell of the State University of New York at of Kurt Gödel in recognition of his major contributions Stony Brook were named recipients of the Gödel Prize of to mathematical logic and of his interest, discovered in the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM) at the a letter he wrote to John von Neumann shortly before International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and von Neumann’s death, in what has become the famous “P Programming (ICALP 2010), held July 5–10 in Bordeaux, versus NP” question. France. The prize carries a cash award of US$5,000. Arora and Mitchell were honored for their concurrent —From an EATCS announcement discovery of a polynomial-time approximation scheme (PTAS) for the Euclidean Traveling Salesman Problem (ETSP). Mitchell was chosen for his 1999 paper, “Guillo- Mathematical Sciences Awards tine subdivisions approximate polygonal subdivisions: A simple polynomial-time approximation scheme for geo- at the 2010 ISEF metric TSP, k-MST, and related problems”, published in the The 2010 Intel International Science and Engineering Fair SIAM Journal of Computing 28(4), 1298–1309. Arora was (ISEF) was held in May 2010 in San Jose, California. Fifteen selected for his 1998 paper, “Polynomial-time approxima- hundred students in grades 9 through 12 from more tion schemes for Euclidean TSP and other geometric prob- than fifty countries participated in the fair. -
Proquest Dissertations
THE FIFTIES IN FINLAND Finnish society in the 1950s from the perspective of the cultural and industrial-banking elites. Alice Hudlerova University College London School of Slavonic and East European Studies Submitted for PhD degree in History April 2002 ProQuest Number: U643425 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest. ProQuest U643425 Published by ProQuest LLC(2016). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT THE FIFTIES IN FINLAND Finnish society in the 1950s from the perspective of the cultural and industrial-banking elites The main topic of the dissertation is the 1950s in Finland, analysed from the perspective of the cultural and industrial-banking elites. During the first post-war decade, Finland witnessed an immense political reorientation in terms of both foreign and domestic politics occurring as a result of the war. Such circumstances were a salient influence on the position and role of the cultural and industrial-banking ehte who, like the rest of the Finnish society, were required to adjust to the post-war circumstances. The process of their adaptability is of particular significance for this study. -
Multi-Family Residences Dating from 1905 to 1930 Are Associated with the Architectural Styles and Culture of Early 20Th Century Residential Architecture
City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report M.S. Hellman Residence 525 Georgina Avenue Santa Monica, California Prepared for City of Santa Monica Planning Division Prepared by Margarita Jerabek, Ph.D. Amanda Kainer, M.S. Nicole Nietzel, M.A. PCR Services Corporation Santa Monica, California February 2015 Table of Contents A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ ii B. LOCATION ............................................................................................................................ ii C. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... ii A. CITY OF SANTA MONICA .................................................................................................... iii A. HISTORIC CONTEXT ......................................................................................................... vi 1. Santa Monica .................................................................................................................. vi 2. The Subdivision and Development of the Palisades Tract ........................................... vi 3. MS Hellman House Construction History ..................................................................... vii 4. Maurice S. Hellman ......................................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. 5. Sumner P. Hunt & Stiles Burns ....................................................................................... -
City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report M.S. Hellman
City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report M.S. Hellman Residence 525 Georgina Avenue Santa Monica, California Prepared for City of Santa Monica Planning Division Prepared by Margarita Jerabek, Ph.D. Amanda Kainer, M.S. Nicole Nietzel, M.A. PCR Services Corporation Santa Monica, California February 2015 List of Tables Page Table 1 Building Permits for 525 Georgina Avenue .................................................................................................................... 8 525 Georgina Avenue City Landmark Assessment and Evaluation Report . ii Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 A. Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................................... 1 B. Location ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 C. Methodology .................................................................................................................................................................................. 1 II. REGULATORY FRAMEWORK ......................................................................................................................................... 3 A. City of Santa Monica ..................................................................................................................................................................