DOCSLIB.ORG

Tobacco Policy Making in Nebraska

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Public Health Resources Public Health Resources 4-1-2004 Three Steps Forward, Two Steps Back: Tobacco Policy Making in Nebraska Andrew Wessel University of California, San Francisco Jennifer Ibrahim University of California, San Francisco Stanton Glantz University of California, San Francisco Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/publichealthresources Part of the Public Health Commons Wessel, Andrew; Ibrahim, Jennifer; and Glantz, Stanton, "Three Steps Forward, Two Steps Back: Tobacco Policy Making in Nebraska" (2004). Public Health Resources. 156. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/publichealthresources/156 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Public Health Resources at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Public Health Resources by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education UC San Francisco Title: Three Steps Forward, Two Steps Back: Tobacco Policy Making in Nebraska Author: Wessel, Andrew, University of California, San Francisco Ibrahim, Jennifer K. Ph.D., University of California, San Francisco Glantz, Stanton A. Ph.D., University of California, San Francisco Publication Date: 04-01-2004 Series: Tobacco Control Policy Making: United States Publication Info: Tobacco Control Policy Making: United States, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco Permalink: http://www.escholarship.org/uc/item/70r843c4 Keywords: taxation, Smokefree policies, clean indoor air, politics, Department of Health, tobacco industry, youth access, state politics, interest group politics Abstract: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • In 2002, 22.7% of Nebraskans over the age of 18 were current smokers, accounting for approximately 389,000 smokers. • Since 1995, the prevalence of adult tobacco use in Nebraska has remained about 1 percentage point below the national average, but per capita tobacco consumption in Nebraska has been falling more slowly than the Unites States as whole. • The tobacco industry has directly been a major political force in Nebraska through lobbying and campaign contributions. The tobacco industry spent over $1,027,000 on lobbying from 1997-2002. The tobacco industry made direct campaign contributions to the members of the 2003- 2004 Nebraska Legislature totaling almost $93,000 over the course of their legislative careers. • Only 20 of the 49 members of the 2003-2004 Legislature have never accepted money from the tobacco industry. • The tobacco industry has also worked to increase its political influence in Nebraska by recruiting, often through financial contributions, third-party allies such as the Nebraska Restaurant eScholarship provides open access, scholarly publishing services to the University of California and delivers a dynamic research platform to scholars worldwide. Association, the Nebraska Chamber of Commerce, the Nebraska Retail Grocers Association, the Nebraska Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association, the Nebraska Retail Federation, the Nebraska Association of Tobacco and Candy Distributors and the Nebraska Licensed Beverage Association. • Despite opposition from the tobacco industry and its allies and the lack of a well-established grassroots tobacco control community, Nebraska was an early leader in passing statewide clean indoor air laws. Due largely to the efforts of state Senator Shirley Marsh, the Nebraska Legislature passed its first clean indoor air law in 1974, only one year after Arizona passed the first law in the nation that required smoking restrictions in some public places. • In 1979, the Nebraska Legislature passed the Nebraska Clean Indoor Air Act, which was sponsored by state Senator Larry Stoney. The Nebraska Clean Indoor Air Act was stronger than similar legislation that was proposed in New York, Connecticut and Massachusetts at the same time. The tobacco industry and its allies responded by mobilizing against the implementing rules and regulations for the Act and succeeded in weakened these regulations. • The Nebraska Clean Indoor Air Act was not strengthened for 20 years until 1999 when the Legislature passed a bill that required that almost all state buildings and vehicles become smokefree. • From 2000 -2003, the Legislature also strengthened the Nebraska Clean Indoor Air Act by requiring that commercial daycare facilities be smokefree and extending its enforcement provisions to include business owners. • From 1999-2004, the Nebraska Legislature has rejected three different attempts by state Senator Nancy Thompson to make restaurants throughout Nebraska smokefree. • Using tobacco settlement money, in 2000, the Nebraska Legislature approved $7 million per year for three years to increase funding for a preexisting state tobacco control program, Tobacco Free Nebraska. • Due to pressure from tobacco control advocates, the Nebraska Legislature approved a $0.30 cigarette excise tax increase in 2002, but the Legislature was only willing to pass this increase during a budget crisis and no earmark was provided for tobacco control. • Citing budget concerns in 2003, the Legislature cut funding for Tobacco Free Nebraska from $7 million per year to $405,000, despite several different options for continuing funding for tobacco control. • In 2003, the Lincoln-Lancaster County Health Department led the push to pass Nebraska first comprehensive smokefree workplaces ordinances, but due to pressure from the tobacco industry and its allies, the Lincoln City Council passed a weakened and confusing ordinance that exempted bars and allowed separately ventilated “smoking rooms.” • Tobacco control advocates have made progress in Nebraska, but they have not yet mobilized the political resources necessary to avoid suffering significant defeats at the hands of the tobacco industry. eScholarship provides open access, scholarly publishing services to the University of California and delivers a dynamic research platform to scholars worldwide. Three Steps Forward, Two Steps Back: Tobacco Policy Making in Nebraska Andrew Wessel Jennifer Ibrahim, Ph.D. Stanton A. Glantz, Ph.D. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94143-1390 April 2004 Three Steps Forward, Two Steps Back: Tobacco Policy Making in Nebraska Andrew J. Wessel Jennifer K. Ibrahim, Ph.D. Stanton A. Glantz, Ph.D. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94143-1390 April 2004 Supported in part by CA-61021. Copyright 2004 by A. J. Wessel, J. K. Ibrahim and S. A. Glantz. Permission is granted to reproduce this report for nonprofit purposes designed to promote the public health, so long as this report is credited. This report is available on the World Wide Web at http://repositories.cdlib.org/ctcre/tcpmus/NE2004. This report is one of a series of reports that analyze tobacco industry campaign contributions, lobbying, and other political activity in Nebraska and other states. The other reports are available on the World Wide Web at http://repositories.cdlib.org/ctcre/. 1 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • In 2002, 22.7% of Nebraskans over the age of 18 were current smokers, accounting for approximately 389,000 smokers. • Since 1995, the prevalence of adult tobacco use in Nebraska has remained about 1 percentage point below the national average, but per capita tobacco consumption in Nebraska has been falling more slowly than the Unites States as whole. • The tobacco industry has directly been a major political force in Nebraska through lobbying and campaign contributions. The tobacco industry spent over $1,027,000 on lobbying from 1997-2002. The tobacco industry made direct campaign contributions to the members of the 2003-2004 Nebraska Legislature totaling almost $93,000 over the course of their legislative careers. • Only 20 of the 49 members of the 2003-2004 Legislature have never accepted money from the tobacco industry. • The tobacco industry has also worked to increase its political influence in Nebraska by recruiting, often through financial contributions, third-party allies such as the Nebraska Restaurant Association, the Nebraska Chamber of Commerce, the Nebraska Retail Grocers Association, the Nebraska Petroleum Marketers and Convenience Store Association, the Nebraska Retail Federation, the Nebraska Association of Tobacco and Candy Distributors and the Nebraska Licensed Beverage Association. • Despite opposition from the tobacco industry and its allies and the lack of a well- established grassroots tobacco control community, Nebraska was an early leader in passing statewide clean indoor air laws. Due largely to the efforts of state Senator Shirley Marsh, the Nebraska Legislature passed its first clean indoor air law in 1974, only one year after Arizona passed the first law in the nation that required smoking restrictions in some public places. • In 1979, the Nebraska Legislature passed the Nebraska Clean Indoor Air Act, which was sponsored by state Senator Larry Stoney. The Nebraska Clean Indoor Air Act was stronger than similar legislation that was proposed in New York, Connecticut and Massachusetts at the same time. The tobacco industry and its allies responded by mobilizing against the implementing
Recommended publications
  • Business Hearing February 07, 2011

    Business Hearing February 07, 2011

    Transcript Prepared By the Clerk of the Legislature Transcriber's Office Business and Labor Committee February 07, 2011 [LB397 LB482 LB555 LB564 LB619 LB623 LB624 LB664 LR29CA] The Committee on Business and Labor met at 1:30 p.m. on Monday, February 7, 2011, in Room 1524 of the State Capitol, Lincoln, Nebraska, for the purpose of conducting a public hearing on LB397, LB482, LB555, LB564, LB623, LB624, LB619, LB664, and LR29CA. Senators present: Steve Lathrop, Chairperson; Tanya Cook, Vice Chairperson; Brad Ashford; Tom Carlson; Burke Harr; Jim Smith; and Norm Wallman. Senators absent: None. SENATOR LATHROP: Good afternoon. My name is Steve Lathrop. I'm the Chair of the Business and Labor Committee, and we're here today to hear a series of bills and they generally relate to the subject matter of the Commission on Industrial Relations. We're still waiting on two members to get here and so I'll take this opportunity to tell you a few of the ground rules that they're very familiar with. And hopefully by the time I get done with this, they'll be here and then I can introduce everyone before we start. As the Chair of the committee, I have a number of responsibilities, and one of them, and it's very basic and fundamental, is to keep the hearing moving to make sure that the information that we're getting is new from one testifier to the next and that we're not caught up in a great deal of repetition; the other is to make sure that we're out of here at a decent hour and to make sure that those senators who are going to introduce bills today do not have to wait until 11:00 tonight to do that.

  • 2008 General Election

    2008 Voter Guide State affi liate & Candidate Survey to the national right to Life General election - november 4 , 2008 Committee Political Action Committee • 404 S. 11th Street, P.O. Box 80410 • Lincoln, NE 68501 2008 Survey for State Candidates abortion-reLateD qUeStionS eUthanaSia qUeStionS 1. in its 1973 rulings, roe v. wade and Doe v. bolton, the U.S. Supreme 11. would you oppose efforts to legalize physician-assisted suicide? Court created a constitutional “right to abortion “which invalidated 12. Do you believe that food and water (nutrition and hydration) the abortion laws in all 50 states giving us a policy of abortion on along with other basic comfort care, should always be provided to demand whereby a woman may obtain an abortion throughout all patients, especially persons with disabilities, the chronically ill and nine months of pregnancy for any reason. nebraska right to Life elderly? (nrL) believes that unborn children should be protected by law and that abortion is permissible only when the life of the mother is in PoLitiCaL PartY qUeStion grave, immediate danger and every effort has been made to save 13. would you support a pro-life plank in your county, state and na- both mother and baby. Under what circumstances, if any, do you tional political party platform? believe abortion should be legal? 1a. in no case. PoLitiCaL free SPeeCh qUeStion 1b. only to prevent the death of the mother. 14. would you support the first amendment right of issue-oriented 1C. in cases of incest and in cases of forcible rape reported to law groups to organize Political action Committees (PaCs) and to enforcement authorities.
  • Hall of Fame to Induct Six on June 4 CONGRESSIONAL DEBATE

    Hall of Fame to Induct Six on June 4 CONGRESSIONAL DEBATE

    Fellowship • Scholarship • Education And the Best View in Town VOLUME 45 • NUMBER 4 APRIL 2016 WWW.OMAHAPRESSCLUB.COM SEE PAGE 3 SEE PAGE 5 By Judy Horan Hall of Fame to induct six on June 4 OPC Committee Co-chair e congratulate the following six journalists who will be honored and inducted into the 2016 Omaha Press Club Journalists of Excellence Hall of Fame. Each has made notable contributions to journalism in the Omaha area: WJim Flowers, Frank Partsch, John Prescott, Jim Roberts, Dr. Marguerita Washington and Dr. Eileen Wirth. JIM FLOWERS FRANK PARTSCH DR. MARGUERITA DR. EILEEN WIRTH WASHINGTON OPC JOURNALISTS OF EXCELLENCE HALL OF FAME Saturday, June 4, 2016 5:30 p.m. No-host reception • 6:30 p.m. Dinner 7:15 p.m. Presentation of Hall of Fame inductees Members $45 - Nonmembers $55 JOHN PRESCOTT MAKE RESERVATIONS EARLY. Call 402-345-8008 More information about the honorees on page 2. TREV ALBERTS to OMAHA PRESS CLUB/LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS speak at April 19 Shatel lunch CONGRESSIONAL DEBATE wo candidates are running in the May 10 Nebraska primary for the Republican nomination for the 2nd Congressional District seat now held by Democrat Brad Ashford. T Chip Maxwell of Omaha is an attorney. He received his law degree from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln and formerly served on the Douglas County Board and as a member of the Nebraska Legislature. Don Bacon of Papillion has had a 30-year career in the Air Force, retiring as a brigadier general and serving at one point at Offutt Air Force Base.
  • Tobacco Policy Making in Nebraska

    Tobacco Policy Making in Nebraska

    Three Steps Forward, Two Steps Back: Tobacco Policy Making in Nebraska Andrew Wessel Jennifer Ibrahim, Ph.D. Stanton A. Glantz, Ph.D. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94143-1390 April 2004 Three Steps Forward, Two Steps Back: Tobacco Policy Making in Nebraska Andrew J. Wessel Jennifer K. Ibrahim, Ph.D. Stanton A. Glantz, Ph.D. Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education School of Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco, CA 94143-1390 April 2004 Supported in part by CA-61021. Copyright 2004 by A. J. Wessel, J. K. Ibrahim and S. A. Glantz. Permission is granted to reproduce this report for nonprofit purposes designed to promote the public health, so long as this report is credited. This report is available on the World Wide Web at http://repositories.cdlib.org/ctcre/tcpmus/NE2004. This report is one of a series of reports that analyze tobacco industry campaign contributions, lobbying, and other political activity in Nebraska and other states. The other reports are available on the World Wide Web at http://repositories.cdlib.org/ctcre/. 1 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • In 2002, 22.7% of Nebraskans over the age of 18 were current smokers, accounting for approximately 389,000 smokers. • Since 1995, the prevalence of adult tobacco use in Nebraska has remained about 1 percentage point below the national average, but per capita tobacco consumption in Nebraska has been falling more slowly than the Unites States as whole. • The tobacco industry has directly been a major political force in Nebraska through lobbying and campaign contributions.
  • 2016 Primary Election Voter Guide 404 S

    2016 Primary Election Voter Guide 404 S

    State Affiliate to the National Right Nebraska to Life Committee Right to Life Political Action Committee 2016 Primary Election Voter Guide 404 S. 11th Street • P.O. Box 80410 • Lincoln, NE 68501 • (402) 438-4802 [email protected] • www.nebraskarighttolife.org Survey for State Candidates ABORTION-RELATED QUESTIONS EUTHANASIA In its 1973 rulings, Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton, the U.S. Supreme Some hospitals have implemented formal policies authorizing denial Court created a constitutional “right to abortion” which invalidated of lifesaving medical treatment against the will of the patient or the the abortion laws in all 50 states, giving us a policy of abortion on patient’s family if an ethics committee thinks the patient’s so-called demand whereby a woman may obtain an abortion throughout all “quality of life” is unacceptable. The federal Patient Self- nine months of pregnancy for any reason. Nebraska Right to Life Determination Act currently requires health care facilities receiv- (NRL) believes that unborn children should be protected by law. ing Medicare or Medicaid to ask patients upon admission whether Under what circumstances, if any, do you believe abortion should they have an advance directive indicating their desire to receive be legal? or refuse lifesaving treatment under certain circumstances. 1A. In no case. 11. Would you support a ban on physician-assisted suicide? 1B. To prevent the death of the mother. 12. Would you oppose involuntary denial of lifesaving medical 1C. In cases of rape and incest. treatment on the basis of a view that treats extending the 1D. In cases of fetal anomaly.