Field Actions Science Reports, Vol. 9 | 2016, « Vol
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
From Resilience to Localisation, Or How Slogans Are Not Enough for an In-Depth Reform of the Humanitarian Sector
6th Issue – November 2017 p. 88-99 From resilience to localisation, or how slogans are not enough for an in-depth reform of the humanitarian sector Perrine Laissus-Benoist et Benoît Lallau • Économistes, Université Lille 1 At regular intervals, a new slogan echoes around the humanitarian sector, with unifying virtues that are supposed to embody its reform. Yet fads pass, and often the poor integration of innovations and new technologies is deplored. What must we conclude? The two authors undertake here a critical exercise, starting from resilience, and apprehending the implementation of the relatively recent, but promising, concept of localisation. id localisation, which was just recently elevated to a priority level during the World Humanitarian Summit in 2016, is already showing its limitations. Why does the A humanitarian sector seem incapable of implementing an admittedly complex methodology, but one so crucial for its reform? In order to understand this phenomenon, it is worth considering the lessons learned from the latest attempts to modify the sector’s architecture. One example, that of resilience, strikes us as particularly informative. It recently had its day in the forefront and its phasing-out is already obvious. By studying the historical reasons for the progressive disconnection of humanitarian models from their fields of intervention, by analysing the double moral and economic stake in the promotion of resilience and by questioning the successes and limits of the concrete applications of localisation in the Central African context, we believe that it is possible to identify the key points necessary for its successful promotion. What does the old refrain of humanitarian reform reveal? Following the crises of confidence which the humanitarian community has been undergoing since the 1990s, the sector has constantly wanted to prove its legitimacy. -
France-Central African Relations: Advantages and Challenges of a North-South Partnership in the Field of Natural Resources
ISSN 2349-7831 International Journal of Recent Research in Social Sciences and Humanities (IJRRSSH) Vol. 6, Issue 2, pp: (51-61), Month: April - June 2019, Available at: www.paperpublications.org France-Central African Relations: Advantages and challenges of a North-South partnership in the field of natural resources Mario Azou-Passonda1, Wei Hong2, Emeline Diane Mariam Seleh-Zo3 1, 2Central China Normal University 3Northwest A & F University Abstract: Our study focuses on the impact of North-South relations in the specific case of France's relations with the Central African Republic (CAR). As part of this study, we analyze some of the actions taken by France for the development of CAR. These actions come from a survey data we conducted in Bangui in 2018 with 624 people. Through this study, we study the benefits that CAR has got from its relations with France. These advantages are reflected in the impact of the actions taken by France in the country as part of its presence in the field of natural resources. Our observation is that the presence of foreign powers in the field of natural resources is conditioned by the achievement of certain actions in diverse fields. We also found that the conclusion of contracts proposed by French companies is not made on a win-win basis. However, our results indicate that France has conducted many actions in CAR that have had a positive impact on the sample. Through this study, we show the importance of solidifying historical partnerships in South-South relations. Also, this study tends to highlight the importance of the evolution of the characteristics of North-South relations traditionally based on unbalanced agreements. -
List of Medical Schools Recognized by the State of California Contents Afghanistan
List of Medical Schools Recognized by the State of California Contents Afghanistan ................................................................................................................................................... 6 Albania .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Algeria ........................................................................................................................................................... 6 Antigua & Barbuda ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Argentina ...................................................................................................................................................... 6 Armenia ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Australia ........................................................................................................................................................ 7 Austria ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 Azerbaijan ..................................................................................................................................................... 8 Bahrain ......................................................................................................................................................... -
UN Mission in the Central African Republic
Assessing the of the United Nations Multidimensional Integrated Stabilization Mission in the Central African Republic / MINUSCA Dr. Lise Morjé Howard Gino Vlavonou, Nina Steinitz, Dr. Yvan Ilunga Publisher: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Copyright: © Norwegian Institute of International Affairs 2020 ISBN: 978-82-7002-348-6 Any views expressed in this publication are those of the authors. They should not be interpreted as reflecting the views of the Norwegian Institute of International Affairs. The text may not be re-published in part or in full without the permission of NUPI and the authors. Visiting address: C.J. Hambros plass 2d Address: P.O. Box 8159 Dep. NO-0033 Oslo, Norway Internet: effectivepeaceops.net | www.nupi.no E-mail: [email protected] Fax: [+ 47] 22 99 40 50 Tel: [+ 47] 22 99 40 00 Assessing the Effectiveness of the United Nations Integrated Multidimensional Stabilization Mission in the Central African Republic (MINUSCA) Lead Author Dr Lise Morjé Howard, Georgetown University, Washington DC Co-authors Mr Gino Vlavonou, University of Ottawa and Social Science Research Council Ms Nina Steinitz, German Police University Dr Yvan Yenda Ilunga, James Madison University Data Contributors Ms Vilde Bergstad Larsen, PRIO, Norway Dr Robert Nagel, Georgetown University, Washington, DC EPON Series Editor Dr Cedric de Coning, NUPI, Norway External Reference Group Dr Katharina Coleman, University of British Columbia Ms Aditi Gorur, Stimson Center, Washington DC Dr Francesca Grandi, King’s College London Dr Paul-Simon Handy, Institute for Security Studies Ms Giovanna Kuele, Igarape Institute and City University of New York Dr Marie-Joelle Zahar, University of Montreal Contents Abstract 5 Acknowledgements 7 Acronyms 9 List of Figures 13 List of Tables 15 Part 1. -
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women
United Nations CEDAW/C/CAF/1-5 Convention on the Elimination Distr.: General 21 February 2013 of All Forms of Discrimination English against Women Original: French Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under Article 18 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women Combined initial and second to fifth periodic reports Central African Republic* [26 June 2012] * In accordance with the information transmitted to States parties regarding the processing of their reports, the present document was not formally edited before being sent to the United Nations translation services. GE.13-41410 (EXT) CEDAW/C/CAF/1-5 Contents Paragraphs Page Abbreviations................................................................................................................................... 4 I. Introduction............................................................................................................. 1–10 7 II. Part 1: Presentation of the Central African Republic .............................................. 11–143 8 A. General data on the Central African Republic................................................ 11–79 8 1. Geography.............................................................................................. 11–15 8 2. Population .............................................................................................. 16–27 9 3. Economic situation................................................................................ -
Central African Republic*
United Nations E/C.12/CAF/1 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 5 September 2017 English Original: French English, French and Spanish only Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under articles 16 and 17 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights Initial reports of States parties due in 1990 Central African Republic* [Date received: 11 August 2017] * The present document is being issued without formal editing. GE.17-14938 (E) 201217 221217 E/C.12/CAF/1 Contents Page Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 4 I. Overview ....................................................................................................................................... 4 A. Geography ............................................................................................................................ 4 B. Climate.................................................................................................................................. 5 C. Vegetation ............................................................................................................................. 5 D. Administrative divisions ....................................................................................................... 5 E. Demography ........................................................................................................................