JOB and WORK ANALYSIS Guidelines on Identifying Jobs for Persons with Disabilities
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Managing for Productivity in the Hospitality Industry © Robert Christie Mill
Managing for Productivity in the Hospitality Industry © Robert Christie Mill This work is licensed under a Creative Commons-ShareAlike 4.0 International License Contents About the author ............................................................................................................1 Robert Christie Mill ..................................................................................................................1 Preface .............................................................................................................................2 Why should we be concerned about productivity and what can we do about it?............2 How do we hire productive employees? ...............................................................................3 How can workplaces and jobs be designed to maximize employee productivity? .........3 How can employees be motivated to be productive? ..........................................................4 Chapter 1 Defining productivity ...................................................................................7 1.1 The challenges of productivity ..........................................................................................7 Impact on the hospitality industry .................................................................................7 Life cycle of the hospitality industry ..............................................................................7 Nature of the industry .....................................................................................................8 -
ASPPB 2016 JTA Report
Association of State and Provincial Psychology Boards Examination for Professional Practice in Psychology (EPPP) Job Task Analysis Report May 19, 2016–September 30, 2016 Prepared by: Pearson VUE November 2016 Copyright © 2016 NCS Pearson, Inc. All rights reserved. PEARSON logo is a trademark in the U.S. and/or other countries. Table of Contents Scope of Work ................................................................................................................. 1 Glossary .......................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 2 Job Task Analysis ............................................................................................................ 3 Expert Panel Meeting .................................................................................................. 4 Developing the Survey ................................................................................................ 4 Piloting the Survey ..................................................................................................... 6 Administering the Survey ............................................................................................ 6 Analyzing the Survey .................................................................................................. 7 Test Specifications Meeting ......................................................................................... -
Job Evaluation Guidelines
Job Evaluation Guidelines All rights, including translation into other languages, reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in print, by photostatic means or in any other manner, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or sold without the express written permission of the International Council of Nurses. Short excerpts (under 300 words) may be reproduced without authorisation, on condition that the source is indicated. Copyright © 2010 by ICN - International Council of Nurses, 3, place Jean-Marteau, CH-1201 Geneva (Switzerland) ISBN: 978-92-95094-16-1 Printing: 2 Table of Contents Introduction 5 Definition and Importance of Job Evaluation 7 Steps in the Job Evaluation Process 8 Avoiding gender bias 9 Job Evaluation Methods 10 Ranking method 10 Classification method 11 Factor comparison method 12 Point-rating method 13 Definition of Remuneration Factors for Nursing 16 Equal Remuneration and Job Evaluation 18 International Classification of Nursing 19 Taxonomy for Job Evaluation 20 National Nurses Association Role in Job Evaluation 21 Conclusion 23 References 24 Appendices Appendix I: Job Evaluation Questionnaire 25 Appendix II: Job Description for Nurses 32 Appendix III: Factors Definition 34 3 4 Introduction "Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, concerned citizens can change the world. Indeed it is the only thing that ever has." — Margaret Mead Nurses have a right to practice in an environment that is conducive to quality care; to expect competitive wages/benefits and to work in a family-friendly environment that promotes the occupational safety and health of its employees. …The work of nursing personnel and its importance for the life, personal safety and health of persons in their care demands measures that encourage and promote the full development and implementation of negotiating mechanisms between employers, nurses and their representatives. -
Block 1: the Foundations and Challenges of Hrm
FUNDAMENTAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE AND ORGANIZATION BEHAVIOUR BTTM 501 BLOCK 1: THE FOUNDATIONS AND CHALLENGES OF HRM Uttarakhand Open University 1 FUNDAMENTAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE AND ORGANIZATION BEHAVIOUR BTTM 501 UNIT 1: DEFINITION OF HRM, ROLE, IMPORTANCE AND CHALLENGES OF HRM Structure: 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Objectives 1.3 Human Resource Management: concept 1.3.1. People who manage 1.3.2. People at work 1.3.3. Definitions of Human Resource Management 1.3.4. Management of Men is a challenging job 1.3.5. Features of Human Resource Management 1.4 Role of Human Resource Management 1.5 Importance of Human Resource Management 1.6 Challenges of Human Resource Management 1.7 Summary 1.8 Glossary 1.9 Answer to check your progress/Possible Answers to SAQ 1.10 References/Bibliography 1.11 Terminal Questions 1.1. INTRODUCTION As one author has rightly said 1+1 makes an organization, i.e., where there are two or more persons there is in effect and organization. Some individuals prefer to work independently in isolated circumstances. But the vast majority of all work in today’s environment takes place within the context of a structured organization- a grouping of individuals into a unified and common effort. To look after the various functions set for the organization adequate resources in men and materials have to be arranged by individuals who serve as managers or supervisors within organizations. Thus there emerged the term ‘Human Resource Management’. Uttarakhand Open University 2 FUNDAMENTAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE AND ORGANIZATION BEHAVIOUR BTTM 501 1.2. OBJECTIVE After reading this unit, you will be able to understand: Concept of HRM The role and importance of HRM The challenges of HRM 1.3. -
Job Evaluation, Motion and Time Study, and Wage Incentives
"LI B R.ARY OF THE U N 1 VERS ITY Of ILLINOIS 331.1 v\o. \- 2,5 V.53 ' m4 : Editorial Note This University of Illinois Bulletin is one of three to be published by the Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations on Industrial Engineering topics. The topics are Job Evaluation, Motion and Time Study, and Wage Incentives. These Bulletins are not intended to "promote" the use of these techniques, but to aid managements and unions which have decided to adopt them. The Institute of Labor and Industrial Relations was established at the University of Illinois in 1946 to "inquire faithfully, honestly, and im- partially into labor-management problems of all types, and secure the facts which will lay the foundation for future progress in the whole field of labor relations." The Bulletin series is designed to carry out these aims by presenting information and ideas on subjects of interest to persons active in the field of labor-management relations. These Bulletins are nontechnical, for general and popular use. Additional copies of this Bulletin and others listed on the inside back cover are available for distribution. Milton Berber Acting Director Donald E. Hoyt Editor I.L.I.R. Publications, Bulletin Series, Vol. 5, No. 3 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS BULLETIN Volume 49, Number 36; January, 1952. Published seven times each month by the University of Illinois. Entered as second-class matter December 11, 1912, at the post office at Urbana, Illinois, under the Act of August 24, 1912. Office of Publication, 358 Administration Building, Urbana, Illinois. JOB EVALUATION by L. -
Job Analysis Generalizability Study for the Position of United Methodist Local Pastor
Job Analysis Generalizability Study for the Position of United Methodist Local Pastor: Focus Group Results Richard P. DeShon, Ph.D. and Abigail Quinn Michigan State University December 15, 2007 Direct correspondence concerning this report to: Richard P. DeShon Department of Psychology Michigan State University East Lansing, MI 48824-1117 517.353.4624 [email protected] Job Analysis 2 Background In July 1999, Robert Kohler, the then chair of the Advisory Committee on Psychological Assessment for the United Methodist Church, contacted me with a request to evaluate the selection criteria used in the ordination process for pastors. At the time, the assessment process was largely based on clinically oriented measures of abnormal personality profiles (e.g., MMPI). The expressed desire was to develop supplementary assessments that would focus on predicting effective performance rather than abnormal behavior. The first stage of this process is an analysis of the “job” performed by pastors to determine the major tasks that make up the job of a UMC pastor and what knowledge, skill, abilities, and personal characteristics contribute to effective performance of those tasks. It was decided that, as an initial step, a small-scale job analysis should be conducted using pastors in the state of Michigan. The study concluded a bit prematurely due to funding limitations. However, a great deal was learned and the final report describing the results of this initial job analysis process was submitted to the committee on February 7, 2003. Current Purpose In February of 2006, the committee, now led by Sharon Rubey, approached me to discuss steps that could be taken to expand the findings from the initial study. -
A Study on Impact of Job Analysis on Job Performance with Special Reference to KARVY
Science, Technology and Development ISSN : 0950-0707 A Study on impact of job analysis on job performance with special reference to KARVY Gandra Madhava Rao1, N. Lakshmi Deepthi2 1. Master of Business Administration student in Malla Reddy Engineering College and Management Sciences, Kistapur (V) Medchal (M) Ranga Reddy (Dist) Telangana. 2. Assistant Professor in Malla Reddy Engineering College and Management Sciences, Kistapur (V) Medchal (M) Ranga Reddy (Dist) Telangana. 1Email: [email protected], 2Email: [email protected] Abstract: The requirement for the examination on job analysis is to know the total data about the job in the association, thorough job analysis program is a fundamental element of sound staff the board. it is the significant contribution to anticipating future human asset prerequisites, job alterations, job assessment, assurance of appropriate pay, and the composition of the job portrayals it is of key significance to labor the board programs due to the more extensive materialness of its outcomes. the data given by job analysis is valuable, if not fundamental, in pretty much every period of worker relation. Therefore, a job description is a result of a job analysis. Where the job analysis describes the general requirements of a certain job, the job description will explain in detail the different tasks to accomplish during the day. “The process to make a job description is to have a strong reflection on the available sources of expertise.” (Richard A. Swanson, 2007, 104) The principle of a job description is to identify the essential function of a work. One of the main objectives of a job description is to be used as a tool during the recruiting process. -
Job Analysis
CHAPTER 3 Job Analysis CHAPTER OUTLINE Some Terminology I/O TODAY The Future of Job Analysis Approaches to Job Analysis The Many Purposes of Job Analysis Job-Analytic Methods Job Classification Criterion Development and Performance Task-Oriented Techniques Appraisal Worker-Oriented Techniques Selection and Placement PRACTITIONER FORUM: John F. Binning Job Design and Redesign Advances and Issues in Job Analysis Practice Training and Research Job Evaluation Defining the Job: Descriptions and Specifications Point System Competency Modeling Comparable Worth Summary Photo: Rawpixel/Shutterstock | 71 Copyright 2017 Worth Publishers. Distributed by Worth Publishers. Strictly for use with its products. Not for redistribution. 03_lev_14261_Ch03_71-98.indd 71 30/03/16 4:00 PM 72 | CHAPTER 3 Job Analysis LEARNING OBJECTIVES This chapter should help you understand: ■■ How important job analysis is to HR functioning ■■ The common terminology used in the area of job analysis ■■ How to differentiate between task-oriented and worker-oriented job analysis techniques ■■ How to conduct a job analysis using the Task Inventory Approach, Functional Job Analysis, Job Element Method, Position Analysis Questionnaire, and Common-Metric Questionnaire ■■ What’s included in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles (DOT) and how it has been improved through the development of the Occupational Information Network (O*NET) ■■ What a job description is and how it is used in human resource practices ■■ What job specifications are and how they are used in human resource practices ■■ The variety of human resource functions for which job analysis is of great importance ■■ The newly developing role of technology in the analysis of jobs ■■ The role of job evaluation in setting compensation levels ■■ The doctrine of comparable worth and the wage gap The second part of this book centers on industrial psychology, or what has been tradi- tionally called personnel psychology. -
Development of an Affective Construct Job Analysis
Development of Affect Job Analysis 1 Running Head: DEVELOPMENT OF AN AFFECT ORIENTED JOB ANALYSIS Initial Development and Validation of an Affect Oriented Job Analysis Measure for Use in the Workplace Patrick W. Maloney & Kevin E. Fox Saint Louis University Contact Information: Patrick W. Maloney 221 N. Grand Blvd. Department of Psychology Shannon Hall St. Louis, MO 63103 Phone: 314-977-7299 Fax: 314-977-1014 Email: [email protected] Development of Affect Job Analysis 2 Abstract In recent years, research examining the relationship between affective constructs (ACs) and workplace behaviors and outcomes has greatly increased (e.g., Ilies, Scott, & Judge, 2006; Cropanzano). In response to encouraging findings, many researchers have called for the use of ACs in personnel selection (Beal, Weiss, Barros, & MacDermid, 2005; Morris & Feldman, 1996; Muchinsky, 2000; Rafaeli & Sutton, 1987). However, the current inability of researchers and human resource professionals to easily identify the jobs for which specific ACs are important is a major impediment to their use in organizations. As such, the current study describes the development of an initial version of the Affective Job Analysis (AJA) measure. Drawing on multiple conceptualizations and theories of affect including trait affectivity, emotional intelligence, emotional labor and emotional contagion; a series of affect-related behaviors suitable for job analysis were generated. The 104 items representing 10 constructs were administered to a convenience sample of 287 working adults and university students. Item content of the initial AJA was refined using an iterative approach based on scale development procedures adopted from Jackson’s (1970) construct oriented approach. Final results suggest that the 10 AJA scales assess several distinct but related constructs. -
Effects of Job Evaluation on Employee Performance in The
EFFECTS OF JOB EVALUATION ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR IN KENYA: A CASE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION BY CHIRCHIR KIPKEMBOI ABRAHAM REG. NO.: C153/CTY/PT/24846/2012 A RESEARCH PROJECT SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRTATION IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION, KENYATTA UNIVERSITY MAY 2016 DECLARATION This research proposal is my original work and has not been presented for examination in any other university. Signature………………………………………… Date…………………………… CHIRCHIR KIPKEMBOI ABRAHAM C153/CTY/PT/24846/2012 This research proposal has been submitted for examination with our approval as the University Supervisors. Signature………………………………………… Date…………………………… Prof. DAVID MINJA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC POLICY AND ADMINISTRATION KENYATTA UNIVERSITY ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my thanks to the almighty God for his sufficient grace and knowledge that has enabled me to accomplish this project. This project would not have been possible without the kind support and help of family, my supervisor at my work place, and the many respondents who took their time to assist in the study. I wish to extend my sincere thanks to all of them. In addition I acknowledge the valuable guidance from my supervisors, Prof. David Minja amd Mr. Ng’eno, KWA who made it possible for me to complete this research. His constant guidance and willingness to share his vast knowledge helped me to complete this task. Although there may be many who remain unacknowledged in this humble note of gratitude there are none who remain unappreciated. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS DECLARATION............................................................................................................. -
Handbook of Workplace Assessment
THE Praise for Handbook of Workplace Assessment Professional Practice (Continued from front flap) SERIES “Wow—what a powerhouse group of authors and topics! This will be my Scott the users of assessments, including hiring managers go-to s ource for in-depth information on a broad range of assessment Reynolds and organizational leaders who are looking for direc- tion on what to assess, what it will take, and how to issues.” editors John C. Scott Handbook of Workplace Assessment realize the benefi ts of an assessment program. This —Wayne F. Cascio, editor, Journal of World Business, and Robert H. Douglas H. Reynolds Handbook is also intended for assessment profession- Reynolds Chair in Global Leadership, The Business School University of als and researchers who build, validate, and implement Colorado Denver EDITORS Given the trend for organizations to streamline their assessments. workforces and focus on acquiring and retaining only top talent, a key challenge has been how to use “The Handbook of Workplace Assessment is must reading for Assessment Handbook of Workplace assessment programs to deliver a high-performing practitioners, researchers, students, and implementers of assessment workforce that can drive revenues, shareholder value, programs as we move forward in a global world of work where changes growth, and long-term sustainability. are continuously anticipated in the workforce, design of jobs, economies, The Handbook of Workplace Assessment directly legal arena, and technologies.” addresses this challenge by presenting sound, —Sheldon Zedeck, professor of psychology, vice provost of academic Handbook of evidence-based, and practical guidance for implement- affairs and faculty welfare, University of California at Berkeley ing assessment processes that will lead to exceptional decisions about people. -
Final Report
FINAL REPORT SPORT PSYCHOLOGY CERTIFICATION JOB TASK ANALYSIS AND VALIDATION Prepared for: In partnership with: The American College of Sports Medicine Dr. Gerald A. Rosen Psychometrician Dr. Robert H. Lipkins Psychometrician January 21, 2016 Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Procedure ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Process – Rationale ............................................................................................................ 2 Job Task Analysis Workshop MeetinG ................................................................................ 3 Table 1: JTA Workshop Participants ................................................................................... 3 Process – Developing the Draft Test Specifications ........................................................... 4 Process – Practice Analysis Validation ............................................................................... 6 Results ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Survey Distribution ............................................................................................................. 7 Table 2: DemoGraphic Characteristics of Respondents ...................................................... 7 Survey Findings