List of Concessions in Michigan State Parks
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Michigan's Historic Preservation Plan
Michigan’s state historic Preservation Plan 2014–2019 Michigan’s state historic Preservation Plan 2014–2019 Governor Rick Snyder Kevin Elsenheimer, Executive Director, Michigan State Housing Development Authority Brian D. Conway, State Historic Preservation Officer Written by Amy L. Arnold, Preservation Planner, Michigan State Historic Preservation Office with assistance from Alan Levy and Kristine Kidorf Goaltrac, Inc. For more information on Michigan’s historic preservation programs visit michigan.gov/SHPo. The National Park Service (NPS), U. S. Department of the Interior, requires each State Historic Preservation Office to develop and publish a statewide historic preservation plan every five years. (Historic Preservation Fund Grants Manual, Chapter 6, Section G) As required by NPS, Michigan’s Five-Year Historic Preservation Plan was developed with public input. The contents do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Michigan State Housing Development Authority. The activity that is the subject of this project has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, through the Michigan State Housing Development Authority. However, the contents and opinions herein do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the Michigan State Housing Development Authority, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products herein constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Michigan State Housing Development Authority. This program receives Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Acts of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilita- tion Act of 1973 and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. -
Michigan State Parks Advisory Committee
MINUTES Michigan State Parks Advisory Committee Wednesday, June 9, 2021 2:00 p.m. Microsoft Teams Meeting / (248) 509-0316 | ID: 626 385 177# PRESENT FOR THE MSPAC Attending remotely: Ann Conklin; Canton Township, Wayne County, Michigan Shaun McKeon; Lansing Twp., Ingham, County, Michigan Bob Hoffmeyer; Lansing, Ingham County, Michigan Mike MacDonald; Okemos, Meridian Twp., Michigan Mary Pitcher; Lake Township, Benzie County, Michigan Chris Graham; Ann Arbor, Washtenaw County, Michigan ABSENT Jim Bradley Julie Clark Mike Foote OTHERS PRESENT Ron Olson, Chief, PRD Jacklin Blodgett, PRD Scott Pratt, PRD Karis Floyd, PRD Amanda Treadwell, PRD Michael Desnoyer, PRD Vicki McGhee, PRD Griselda Trevino, PRD Barbara Graves, PRD OPENING COMMENTS Committee member Conklin called the meeting to order at 2:02 p.m. and asked for a roll call. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Ann Conklin motioned for approval of the April 14, 2021 meeting minutes. The motion was moved by Mike McDonald, supported by Chris Graham, and passed unanimously. 1 MICHIGAN STATE PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES – June 9, 2021 GENERAL UPDATES Ron Olson, Chief, PRD The fiscal year 2022 budget process continues, and our budget remains intact except for the removal of the Summer Youth Employment Program; core cities include Pontiac, Saginaw, and Flint and groups are letting it be known that this is a valued activity. Still waiting on word of federal funds and if they will be allotted for shovel ready projects. Numbers are trending upwards in all categories and because of the heavy visitation and staffing issues, challenges remain. He has talked to five other state park systems who are having the same problem with hiring. -
100 Years of Michigan State Parks
1 ourmidland.com 2 Page 2 | Week of May 6 -11, 2019 Which state park was Michigan’s first? As the DNR celebrates the 100th anniversary of Michigan state parks system, a natural question arises – what was Michigan’s first state park? Well, the answer depends on how you interpret the question and isn’t simple. The 2019 state parks centennial celebration is centered around the formation of the Michigan State Park Commission by the state Legislature on May 12, 1919. The commission was given responsibility for overseeing, acquiring and maintaining public lands and establishing Michigan’s state parks system. One of the state’s earliest purchases was the site of Interlochen State Park in 1917. Although the land was purchased prior to 1919, Interlochen was the first public park to be transferred to the Michigan State Park Commission in 1920 and is considered Michigan’s first state park. However, many consider Mackinac Island as Michigan’s first state park, which is also true. Approximately 25 years before legislation estab- lished the state park commission, the federal government gifted the Mackinac Island property it owned to the state in 1895. The island was designat- ed as Michigan’s first state park under the Mackinac State Park Commission. Because Mackinac Island is operated under the Mackinac State Park Commission and was not placed under the Michigan State Park Commission, there is more than one answer to the “first state park” question. Interlochen State Park The Michigan Legislature paid $60,000 for the land that became Interlochen State Park, located southwest of Traverse City, in 1917. -
Boardwalk Interactions with a Lake Michigan Dune System
Boardwalk Interactions with a Lake Michigan Dune System by Gabe LePage, Bastian Bouman, Benjamin Johnson, Ryan Kiper, and Madison Smith FYRES: Dunes Research Report # 17 May 2015 Department of Geology, Geography and Environmental Studies Calvin College Grand Rapids, Michigan ABSTRACT Boardwalks enable visitors to enjoy dunes in a way that protects sensitive dune environments from human impacts, but a tension remains as a boardwalk itself alters a dune system. This study investigates how a boardwalk in Hoffmaster State Park, Michigan affects human interactions with a Lake Michigan coastal dune system. In autumn 2014, the boardwalk was mapped and the quality of its features assessed. Human impacts were investigated by documenting unmanaged trails and interviewing park staff. Ecological communities were mapped, and vegetation conditions near the trails were recorded. The boardwalk is part of a managed trail system connecting a visitor center with the beach; the boardwalk gives visitors access to a high dune lookout over Lake Michigan. The boardwalk ends at two viewing platforms and is worn but functional. A network of unmanaged trails indicate that people leave the boardwalk. The boardwalk and the unmanaged trails interrupt the ecological communities. The study results suggest that the boardwalk enables enjoyment of the dune and protects vulnerable environments, but it also affects the formation of unmanaged trails and influences dune processes. Understanding the spatial patterns of human interaction with the dune can inform the planning process as park staff work towards reconstructing the boardwalk in the next few years. INTRODUCTION Boardwalks provide people with experiences of fragile natural areas while simultaneously protecting vulnerable environments. -
Supporting Analysis
APPENDIX A Supporting Analysis Table of Contents A.1 PARK SETTING ................................................................................................................................................ 2 A.2 DEMOGRAPHICS ............................................................................................................................................ 4 A.3 HISTORY OF THE LUDINGTON AREA ........................................................................................................... 6 A.4 HISTORY OF LUDINGTON STATE PARK ....................................................................................................... 7 A.5 LAND OWNERSHIP AND ACQUISITIONS ................................................................................................... 10 A.6 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER RECREATION RESOURCES ............................................................................. 13 A.7 LEGAL MANDATES ........................................................................................................................................ 19 A.8 NATURAL SYSTEMS AND NATURAL RESOURCES ..................................................................................... 23 A.9 CULTURAL RESOURCES ............................................................................................................................... 27 A.10 EDUCATION AND INTERPRETATION ......................................................................................................... 30 A.11 RECREATION RESOURCES ......................................................................................................................... -
Michigan Strategic Fund
MICHIGAN STRATEGIC FUND MEMORANDUM DATE: March 12, 2021 TO: The Honorable Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan Members of the Michigan Legislature FROM: Mark Burton, President, Michigan Strategic Fund SUBJECT: FY 2020 MSF/MEDC Annual Report The Michigan Strategic Fund (MSF) is required to submit an annual report to the Governor and the Michigan Legislature summarizing activities and program spending for the previous fiscal year. This requirement is contained within the Michigan Strategic Fund Act (Public Act 270 of 1984) and budget boilerplate. Attached you will find the annual report for the MSF and the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) as required in by Section 1004 of Public Act 166 of 2020 as well as the consolidated MSF Act reporting requirements found in Section 125.2009 of the MSF Act. Additionally, you will find an executive summary at the forefront of the report that provides a year-in-review snapshot of activities, including COVID-19 relief programs to support Michigan businesses and communities. To further consolidate legislative reporting, the attachment includes the following budget boilerplate reports: • Michigan Business Development Program and Michigan Community Revitalization Program amendments (Section 1006) • Corporate budget, revenue, expenditures/activities and state vs. corporate FTEs (Section 1007) • Jobs for Michigan Investment Fund (Section 1010) • Michigan Film incentives status (Section 1032) • Michigan Film & Digital Media Office activities ( Section 1033) • Business incubators and accelerators annual report (Section 1034) The following programs are not included in the FY 2020 report: • The Community College Skilled Trades Equipment Program was created in 2015 to provide funding to community colleges to purchase equipment required for educational programs in high-wage, high-skill, and high-demand occupations. -
Map of Natural and Preserves
The Leelanau Conservancy An Accredited Organization The Leelanau Conservancy was awarded accreditation status in September, 008. The Land Trust Accreditation Commission awards the accreditation seal to community institutions that meet national quality standards for protecting important natural places and working lands forever. Learn more at the Land Trust Alliance website: www.landtrustaccreditation.org. Map of Natural and Preserves Leelanau State Park and Open to the public Grand Traverse Light Best seen on a guided hike Lighthouse West Natural Area Finton Natural Area Critical areas, o limits Je Lamont Preserve Kehl Lake Natural Area North Soper Preserve Manitou Houdek Dunes M201 Island Natural Area NORTHPORT Gull Island Nedows Bay M 22 Preserve OMENA Belanger 637 Creek South Leland Village Green Preserve Manitou Whittlesey Lake MichiganIsland LELAND 641 Preserve Hall Beach North PESHAWBESTOWN Frazier-Freeland Manitou Passage Preserve Lake Leelanau M204 Whaleback Suttons Bay Sleeping Bear Dunes Natural Area 45th Parallel LAKE Park National Lakeshore LEELANAU SUTTONS Narrows 643 Natural Area GLEN Little M 22 BAY Crystal River HAVEN Traverse GLEN Lake Krumweide ARBOR 633 Forest 645 Reserve Little Big Greeno Preserve Glen Glen Lime Mebert Creek Preserve BINGHAM Teichner Lake Lake Lake 643 Preserve South M109 616 Lake Grand BURDICKVILLE MAPLE Leelanau Traverse CITY CEDAR 641 Chippewa Run Bay 669 651 M 22 Natural Area M 22 677 Cedar River 667 614 Cedar Sleeping Bear Dunes Lake Preserve Visitor's Center EMPIRE 616 DeYoung 651 616 Natural Area GREILICKVILLE M 72 Benzie County Grand Traverse County TRAVERSE CITY Conserving Leelanau’s Land, Water, and Scenic Character Who We Are We’re the group that, since 1988, has worked to protect the places that you love and the character that makes the Leelanau Peninsula so unique. -
General Management Plan for Silver Lake State Park; And
Silver Lake State Park Silver Lake State Park General Management Plan 2 RESOLUTION NO. 02-2012-05 MICHIGAN STATE PARKS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (MSPAC) RESOLUTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE “SILVER LAKE STATE PARK – PHASE 1 - GENERAL MANAGEMENT PLAN” ADOPTED: FEBRUARY 9, 2012 WHEREAS, the Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Parks and Recreation Division has completed Phase 1 of the General Management Plan for Silver Lake State Park; and WHEREAS, the planning process reflects sensitivity to natural resource values, historic and cultural resource values, recreation and education opportunities, and is inclusive of all DNR programs and representative of eco-management; and WHEREAS, the planning process was further inclusive of stakeholder, constituent, and public input; and WHEREAS, the General Management Plan represents sound guidance for future planning phases that will be consistent with the mission of the DNR and the Parks and Recreation Division, and reflective of the purpose and significance of Silver Lake State Park; and WHEREAS, the General Management Plan has been reviewed and recommended for approval by the Parks and Recreation Division and the MSPAC Stewardship and Operations Subcommittee. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Michigan State Parks Advisory Committee recommends approval of the Silver Lake State Park – Phase 1 - General Management Plan; and THERFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Michigan State Parks Advisory Committee further recommends that the DNR Director approve the Phase 1 – General Management Plan for Silver Lake State Park; and THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon the DNR Director’s approval, the Parks and Recreation Division initiate the Phase 2 – Long Range Action Goals Plan for Silver Lake State Park. -
Burt Lake Shoreline Survey 2009
Burt Lake Shoreline Survey 2009 By Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council Report written by: Kevin L. Cronk Monitoring and Research Coordinator Table of Contents Page List of Tables and Figures iii Summary 1 Introduction 2 Background 2 Shoreline development impacts 3 Study Area 7 Methods 13 Field Survey Parameters 13 Data processing 17 Results 18 Discussion 21 Recommendations 26 Literature and Data Referenced 29 ii List of Tables Page Table 1. Burt Lake watershed land-cover statistics 9 Table 2. Categorization system for Cladophora density 15 Table 3. Cladophora density statistics 18 Table 4. Septic Leachate Detector (SLD) results 18 Table 5. Greenbelt score statistics 19 Table 6. Shoreline alteration statistics 19 Table 7. Cladophora density comparisons: 2001 to 2009 21 Table 8. Greenbelt rating comparisons: 2001 to 2009 21 Table 9. Shore survey statistics from Northern Michigan lakes 22 List of Figures Page Figure 1. Map of Burt Lake, Features and Depths 8 Figure 2. Map of the Burt Lake watershed 10 Figure 3. Chart of phosphorus data from Burt Lake 12 Figure 4. Chart of trophic status index data from Burt Lake 12 iii SUMMARY During the summer of 2009, the Tip of the Mitt Watershed Council conducted a comprehensive shoreline survey on Burt Lake that was sponsored by the Burt Lake Preservation Association. Watershed Council staff surveyed the entire shoreline in June and July to document conditions that potentially impact water quality. The parameters surveyed include: algae as a bio-indicator of nutrient pollution, greenbelt status, shoreline erosion, shoreline alterations, nearshore substrate types, and stream inlets and outlets. -
Lake Michigan Water Trail Plan, Phase I: Inventory & Assessment
LAKE MICHIGAN WATER TRAIL PLAN, PHASE I: Inventory and Analysis of Access Sites in Support of a Lake Michigan Water Trail Southwest Michigan, West Michigan, Northwest Michigan, and the Upper Peninsula July 2014 Prepared by the in partnership with: This project was funded, in part, by the Michigan Coastal Zone Management Program, Department of Environmental Quality Office of the Great Lakes and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. PROJECT TEAM from the: TABLE OF CONTENTS West Michigan Shoreline Regional Introduction and Background...................... 2 Development Commission Vision and Goals .......................................4 What is a Water Trail? ...........................4 Drawing the Larger Picture ....................4 Visions, Goals, and Objectives.................5 Erin Kuhn, Executive Director Inventory Process .....................................6 Kathy Evans, Program Manager Regional Water Trail Segments ...................7 Amy Haack, Program Manager Southwest Michigan Segment ................9 West Michigan Segment ......................10 Joshua Croff, Planner Northwest Michigan Segment ...............11 Upper Peninsula Segment ....................12 WMSRDC Officers Action Plan .............................................13 Enhancement Zones/Analysis .....................13 Joe Lenius, Chairperson Southwest Michigan ..........................14 Mason County Commissioner West Michigan ...................................16 Susie Hughes, Vice-Chairperson Northwest Michigan -
2011 Annual Beach Monitoring Report
MI/DEQ/WRD-12/034 MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY WATER RESOURCES DIVISION AUGUST 2012 STAFF REPORT MICHIGAN BEACH MONITORING YEAR 2011 ANNUAL REPORT INTRODUCTION The Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ), Surface Water Quality Monitoring Program, is summarized in the January 1997 report entitled, “A Strategic Environmental Quality Monitoring Program for Michigan’s Surface Waters” (Strategy) (MDEQ, 1997). The objectives of the beach monitoring component of the Strategy are listed below: 1. Assist local health departments to implement and strengthen beach monitoring programs. 2. Create and maintain a statewide database. 3. Determine whether waters of the state are safe for total body contact recreation. 4. Compile data to determine overall water quality. 5. Evaluate the effectiveness of MDEQ programs in attaining Water Quality Standards (WQS) for pathogen indicators. 1. ASSIST LOCAL HEALTH DEPARTMENTS TO IMPLEMENT AND STRENGTHEN BEACH MONITORING PROGRAMS Beach Monitoring The monitoring of beaches in Michigan is voluntary and is conducted by the local health departments. Health departments are required to comply with Michigan’s WQS according to R 333.12544 of the Public Health Code, 1978 PA 368 (Act 368), as amended. According to R 333.12541 of Act 368, a local health officer or an authorized representative of a local health department that conducts tests at bathing beaches is required to notify the MDEQ and other entities of the test results within 36 hours of conducting a test or evaluation. This rule also states that the local health department may petition the circuit court for an injunction ordering the owners of a beach to close the beach. -
Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County